research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 72| Part 2| February 2016| Pages 184-187

Crystal structures of (S)-(+)-5-(3-bromo/chloro-4-isopropoxyphen­yl)-5-methyl­imidazolidine-2,4-dione

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aResearch and Education Center for Natural Sciences, Keio University, Hiyoshi 4-1-1, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8521, Japan, and bTokyo New Drug Research Laboratories, Pharmaceutical Division, Kowa Company, Ltd., 2-17-43, Noguchicho, Higashimurayama, Tokyo 189-0022, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: ohba@a3.keio.jp

Edited by J. Simpson, University of Otago, New Zealand (Received 25 November 2015; accepted 1 December 2015; online 16 January 2016)

In (S)-(+)-5-(3-bromo-4-isopropoxyphen­yl)-5-methyl­imidazolidine-2,4-dione, C13H15BrN2O3, (I), the hydantoin groups are connected via inter­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a terraced sheet structure. In the chloro analogue, (S)-(+)-5-(3-chloro-4-isopropoxyphen­yl)-5-methyl­imidazolidine-2,4-dione, C13H15ClN2O3, (II), the inter­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding network forms a flat sheet. Comparison of the crystal structures reveals that (II) is more loosely packed than (I).

1. Chemical context

In searching for a new synthetic β-selective agonist toward liver X receptors (LXR), a series of compounds having the hydantoin tail, which may act as a linker, were synthesized and examined (Matsuda et al., 2015[Matsuda, T., Okuda, A., Watanabe, Y., Miura, T., Ozawa, H., Tosaka, A., Yamazaki, K., Yamaguchi, Y., Kurobuchi, S., Koura, M. & Shibuya, K. (2015). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 1274-1278.]; Koura et al., 2015[Koura, M., Matsuda, T., Okuda, A., Watanabe, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., Kurobuchi, S., Matsumoto, Y. & Shibuya, K. (2015). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 2668-2674.]). It has been revealed that the chirality of the hydantoin unit is crucial to the LXR activation and β selectivity (Koura et al., 2016[Koura, M., Sumida, H., Yamazaki, Y. & Shibuya, K. (2016). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 27, 63-68.]). In the present study, the absolute configuration of the (+)-hydantoin unit, which leads to pharmacological activity, has been determined definitely from anomalous-dispersion effects in diffraction measurements on crystals of the title bromo and chloro derivatives.

[Scheme 1]
[Scheme 2]

2. Structural commentary

The conformations of the mol­ecules (I)[link] and (II)[link] are similar to one another (Figs. 1[link] and 2[link]), although the inclination angles of the C11–C16 benzene rings to the hydantoin group around the C7—C11 bond axes differ somewhat, the N5—C7—C11—C16 torsion angles being 12.9 (3)° and −9.8 (2)° for (I)[link] and (II)[link], respectively. The configuration around the asymmetric carbon atom C7 of the (+)-isomer has been determined to S for both (I)[link] and (II)[link]. It is worthwhile to compare the Flack parameters calculated by classical refinement (Flack, 1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881.]) and Parsons' quotient (Parsons et al., 2013[Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249-259.]) for these Br and Cl compounds which were measured with Mo Kα radiation. These values are 0.010 (7) and 0.018 (2) for (I)[link], and 0.010 (50) and 0.009 (8) for (II)[link], respectively. Flack parameters with much smaller s.u. values were obtained by Parsons' method.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of (I)[link], showing displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The mol­ecular structure of (II)[link], showing displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.

3. Supra­molecular features

The crystal structure of (I)[link] projected along a is shown in Fig. 3[link]. The hydantoin ring systems are linked by two sets of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1[link]) and are arranged in zigzag fashion along the twofold screw axes at z = 0 and z = ½ along a. Groups of four mol­ecules are linked by these N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, generating [R_{4}^{4}](20) ring motifs, forming terraced sheets parallel to (001) as shown schematically in Fig. 4[link]. The 3-bromo-4-isopropoxyphenyl groups are accommodated between these sheets and linked by the C—H⋯Br and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional architecture.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (I)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C18—H18B⋯O4i 0.98 2.60 3.529 (3) 158
C15—H15⋯Br1i 0.95 3.02 3.939 (2) 162
N6—H6⋯O4ii 0.88 1.97 2.828 (2) 165
N5—H5⋯O3iii 0.88 2.12 2.861 (2) 141
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+2, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (ii) [x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+1]; (iii) [x-{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, -z+1].
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
The crystal structure of (I)[link], projected along a. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
A schematic drawing of the N—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding network in (I)[link]. The arrows indicate the twofold screw axes along a.

Both (I)[link] and (II)[link] crystallize in space group P212121 and the lattice constants are roughly similar for both. However, there are both similarities and significant differences in the packing modes between the two closely related mol­ecules. The crystal structure of (II)[link] projected along a is shown in Fig. 5[link]. The hydantoin ring systems again lie approximately on planes at z = 0 or z = ½, and are connected by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 2[link]), forming a flat sheet parallel to (001). Between these sheets 3-chloro-4-isopropoxyphenyl groups are linked by C—H⋯Cl and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, generating a three-dimensional structure of mol­ecules stacked along a.

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (II)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N5—H5⋯O3i 0.88 2.00 2.8155 (16) 154
N6—H6⋯O4ii 0.88 2.03 2.8845 (16) 163
C12—H12⋯O4 0.95 2.57 3.0679 (19) 113
C12—H12⋯O4iii 0.95 2.39 3.2294 (18) 147
C17—H17⋯Cl1iv 1.00 2.83 3.831 (2) 175
C18—H18B⋯O4iv 0.98 2.50 3.409 (2) 154
Symmetry codes: (i) [x-{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+1]; (ii) [x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, -z+1]; (iii) [x-{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, -z+1]; (iv) [-x+1, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{3\over 2}}].
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
The crystal structure of (II)[link], projected along a. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Comparison of the crystal structures reveals that (II)[link] is more loosely packed than (I)[link]. There are significant differences in the van der Waals radii of the Br and Cl atoms (1.85 and 1.75 Å, respectively; Bondi, 1964[Bondi, A. (1964). J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441-451.]) which is reflected in the C—X bond distances [C13—Br1 = 1.8945 (18) Å in (I)[link]; C13—Cl1 1.7396 (16) Å in (II)]. However, the effective volume of the mol­ecule in (II)[link] estimated by V/Z is larger by ca 4% than that for (I)[link]. This suggests that the nearly coplanar arrangement of the hydantoin groups in (II)[link] is favorable for the formation of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds as seen from Table 2[link], but it also results in looser mol­ecular packing.

4. Database survey

Structures of 5-phenyl-5-alkyl­hydantoin derivatives have been investigated to review the relationships between the absolute configuration and optical activity. Knabe & Wunn (1980[Knabe, J. & Wunn, W. (1980). Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 313, 538-543.]) determined the absolute configurations of 5,5-disubstituted hydantoins based on their chemical syntheses. According to this assignment, the structure of S-(+)-5-phenyl-5-ethyl­hydantoin was reported (Coquerel et al., 1993[Coquerel, G., Petit, M. N. & Robert, F. (1993). Acta Cryst. C49, 824-825.]). Ferron et al. (2006[Ferron, L., Guillen, F., Coste, S., Coquerel, G. & Plaquevent, J.-C. (2006). Chirality, 18, 662-666.]) determined the configuration of (R)-(−)-5-p-methyl­phenyl-5-methyl­hydantoin in a chlathrate compound with permethyl­ated β-cyclo­dextrin based on the known absolute configuration of the host. Martin et al. (2011[Martin, T., Massif, C., Wermester, N., Linol, J., Tisse, S., Cardinael, P., Coquerel, G. & Bouillon, J.-P. (2011). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 22, 12-21.]) prepared the diastereomeric salt of (S)-(+)-5-phenyl-5-tri­fluoro­methyl­hydantoin with (+)-α-methyl­benzyl­amine to determine the configuration based on the known absolute configuration of the chiral amine. It is noted that the R and S notation remains unchanged when CH3 at the 5-position of the hydantoin is replaced with CF3, although the priorities of the substituents in the sequence rule are altered. To our knowledge, the present paper is the first to report the absolute configuration of such compounds determined from anomalous-dispersion effects.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

Compounds (I)[link] and (II)[link] were prepared from the corres­ponding (+)-non-halogeno-derivatives, which were separated from a racemic mixture (Koura et al., 2016[Koura, M., Sumida, H., Yamazaki, Y. & Shibuya, K. (2016). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 27, 63-68.]). Prismatic crystals of (I)[link] were grown from ethyl­acetate solution. The specific rotation, [α]D, of (I)[link] at 293 K is +79.7° (c = 0.98, MeOH, where c is the concentration of units gram per 100 cm−3).

Plate-like crystals of (II)[link] were grown from ethyl­acetate solution. The specific rotation, [α]D, of (II)[link] at 293 K is +81.4° (c = 1.0, MeOH).

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3[link]. All H atoms bound to C and N were positioned geometrically. They were refined as riding, with N—H = 0.88 Å, C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å, and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C/N) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(Cmethyl). The thermal displacement ellipsoids of the non-hydrogen atoms of the isoprop­oxy group in (II)[link] are larger than those in (I)[link], suggesting some positional disorder, which was not taken into account in the refinement.

Table 3
Experimental details

  (I) (II)
Crystal data
Chemical formula C13H15BrN2O3 C13H15ClN2O3
Mr 327.17 282.72
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, P212121 Orthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K) 90 90
a, b, c (Å) 6.1840 (3), 9.6495 (4), 23.1111 (10) 7.1397 (3), 10.0128 (4), 20.0431 (8)
V3) 1379.10 (11) 1432.85 (10)
Z 4 4
Radiation type Mo Kα Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 2.99 0.27
Crystal size (mm) 0.25 × 0.25 × 0.10 0.27 × 0.27 × 0.21
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 VENTURE Bruker D8 VENTURE
Absorption correction Integration (SADABS; Bruker, 2014[Bruker (2014). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Integration (SADABS; Bruker, 2014[Bruker (2014). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.482, 0.631 0.916, 0.954
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 31000, 3271, 3206 32943, 3425, 3350
Rint 0.028 0.023
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.659 0.660
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.017, 0.047, 1.29 0.027, 0.079, 1.68
No. of reflections 3271 3425
No. of parameters 175 175
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.41, −0.30 0.28, −0.22
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 1301 quotients [(I+)−(I)]/[(I+)+(I)] (Parsons et al., 2013[Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249-259.]). Flack x determined using 1385 quotients [(I+)−(I)]/[(I+)+(I)] (Parsons et al., 2013[Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249-259.])
Absolute structure parameter 0.018 (2) 0.009 (8)
Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014[Bruker (2014). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008[Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466-470.]) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Chemical context top

In searching for a new synthetic β-selective agonist toward liver X receptors (LXR), a series of the compounds having the hydantoin tail, which may act as a linker, were synthesized and examined (Matsuda et al., 2015; Koura, Matsuda et al., 2015). It has been revealed that the chirality of the hydantoin unit is crucial to the LXR activation and β selectivity (Koura, Sumida et al., 2015). In the present study, the absolute configuration of the (+)-hydantoin unit, which leads to pharmacological activity, has been determined definitely from anomalous-dispersion effects in diffraction measurements on crystals of the title bromo and chloro derivatives.

Structural commentary top

The conformations of the molecules (I) and (II) are similar to one another (Figs. 1 and 2), although the inclination angles of the C11–C16 benzene rings to the hydantoin group around the C7—C11 bond axes differ somewhat, the N5—C7—C11—C16 torsion angles being 12.9 (3)° and −9.8 (2)° for (I) and (II), respectively. The configuration around the asymmetric carbon atom C7 of the (+)-isomer has been determined to S for both (I) and (II). It is worthwhile to compare the Flack parameters calculated by classical refinement (Flack, 1983) and Parsons' quotient (Parsons et al., 2013) for these Br and Cl compounds which were measured with Mo Kα radiation. These values are 0.010 (7) and 0.018 (2) for (I), and 0.010 (50) and 0.009 (8) for (II), respectively. Flack parameters with much smaller s. u. values were obtained by Parsons' method.

Supra­molecular features top

The crystal structure of (I) projected along a is shown in Fig. 3. The hydantoin ring systems are linked by two sets of N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) and are arranged in zigzag fashion along the twofold screw axes at z = 0 and z = 1/2 along a. Groups of four molecules are linked by these N—H···O hydrogen bonds, generating R44(20) ring motifs, forming terraced sheets parallel to (001) as shown schematically in Fig. 4. The 3-bromo-4-isopropoxyphenyl groups are accommodated between these sheets and linked by the C—H···Br and C—H···O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional architecture.

Both (I) and (II) crystallize in space group P212121 and the lattice constants are roughly similar for both. However, there are both similarities and significant differences in the packing modes between the two closely related molecules. The crystal structure of (II) projected along a is shown in Fig. 5. The hydantoin ring systems again lie approximately on planes at z = 0 or z = 1/2, and are connected by N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 2), forming a flat sheet parallel to (001). Between these sheets 3-chloro-4-isopropoxyphenyl groups are linked by C—H···Cl and C—H···O hydrogen bonds, generating a three-dimensional network structure of molecules stacked along a.

Comparison of crystal structures reveals that (II) is more loosely packed than (I). There are significant differences in the van der Waals radii of the Br and Cl atoms (1.85 and 1.75 Å, respectively; Bondi, 1964) which is reflected in the C—X bond distances [C13—Br1 = 1.8945 (18) Å in (I); C13—Cl1 1.7396 (16) Å in (II)]. However, the effective volume of the molecule in (II) estimated by V/Z is larger by ca 4% than that for (I). This suggests that the nearly coplanar arrangement of the hydantoin groups in (II) is favorable for the formation of N—H···O hydrogen bonds as seen from Table 2, but it also results in looser molecular packing.

Database survey top

Structures of 5-phenyl-5-alkyl­hydantoin derivatives have been investigated to review the relationships between the absolute configuration and optical activity. Knabe & Wunn (1980) determined the absolute configurations of 5,5-disubstituted hydantoins based on their chemical syntheses. According to this assignment, the structure of S-(+)-5-phenyl-5-ethyl­hydantoin was reported (Coquerel et al., 1993). Ferron et al. (2006) determined the configuration of (R)-(-)-5-p-methyl­phenyl-5-methyl­hydantoin in a chlathrate compound with permethyl­ated β-cyclo­dextrin based on the known absolute configuration of the host. Martin et al. (2011) prepared the diastereomeric salt of (S)-(+)-5-phenyl-5-tri­fluoro­methyl­hydantoin with (+)-α-methyl­benzyl­amine to determine the configuration based on the known absolute configuration of the chiral amine. It is noted that the R and S notation remains unchanged when CH3 at the 5-position of the hydantoin is replaced with CF3, although the priorities of the substituents in the sequence rule are altered. To our knowledge, the present paper is the first to report the absolute configuration of such compounds determined from anomalous-dispersion effects.

Synthesis and crystallization top

Compounds (I) and (II) were prepared from the corresponding (+)-non-halogeno-derivatives, which were separated from a racemic mixture (Koura, Sumida et al., 2015). Prismatic crystals of (I) were grown from ethyl­acetate solution. The specific rotation, [α]D, of (I) at 293 K is +79.7° (c = 0.98, MeOH, where c is the concentration of units gram per 100 cm−3).

Plate-like crystals of (II) were grown from ethyl­acetate solution. The specific rotation, [α]D, of (II) at 293 K is +81.4° (c = 1.0, MeOH).

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. Intensity data were collected in a full sphere. All H atoms bound to C and N were positioned geometrically. They were refined as riding, with N—H = 0.88 Å, C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å, and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C/N) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C)for methyl hydrogen atoms. The thermal displacement ellipsoids of the non-hydrogen atoms of the isoprop­oxy group in (II) are larger than those in (I), suggesting some positional disorder, which was not taken into account in the refinement.

Related literature top

Several 2-oxochromene derivatives of chiral hydantoin molecules show liver X receptor β-selective agonists activity (Matsuda et al., 2015; Koura, Matsuda et al., 2015).

Structure description top

In searching for a new synthetic β-selective agonist toward liver X receptors (LXR), a series of the compounds having the hydantoin tail, which may act as a linker, were synthesized and examined (Matsuda et al., 2015; Koura, Matsuda et al., 2015). It has been revealed that the chirality of the hydantoin unit is crucial to the LXR activation and β selectivity (Koura, Sumida et al., 2015). In the present study, the absolute configuration of the (+)-hydantoin unit, which leads to pharmacological activity, has been determined definitely from anomalous-dispersion effects in diffraction measurements on crystals of the title bromo and chloro derivatives.

The conformations of the molecules (I) and (II) are similar to one another (Figs. 1 and 2), although the inclination angles of the C11–C16 benzene rings to the hydantoin group around the C7—C11 bond axes differ somewhat, the N5—C7—C11—C16 torsion angles being 12.9 (3)° and −9.8 (2)° for (I) and (II), respectively. The configuration around the asymmetric carbon atom C7 of the (+)-isomer has been determined to S for both (I) and (II). It is worthwhile to compare the Flack parameters calculated by classical refinement (Flack, 1983) and Parsons' quotient (Parsons et al., 2013) for these Br and Cl compounds which were measured with Mo Kα radiation. These values are 0.010 (7) and 0.018 (2) for (I), and 0.010 (50) and 0.009 (8) for (II), respectively. Flack parameters with much smaller s. u. values were obtained by Parsons' method.

The crystal structure of (I) projected along a is shown in Fig. 3. The hydantoin ring systems are linked by two sets of N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) and are arranged in zigzag fashion along the twofold screw axes at z = 0 and z = 1/2 along a. Groups of four molecules are linked by these N—H···O hydrogen bonds, generating R44(20) ring motifs, forming terraced sheets parallel to (001) as shown schematically in Fig. 4. The 3-bromo-4-isopropoxyphenyl groups are accommodated between these sheets and linked by the C—H···Br and C—H···O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional architecture.

Both (I) and (II) crystallize in space group P212121 and the lattice constants are roughly similar for both. However, there are both similarities and significant differences in the packing modes between the two closely related molecules. The crystal structure of (II) projected along a is shown in Fig. 5. The hydantoin ring systems again lie approximately on planes at z = 0 or z = 1/2, and are connected by N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 2), forming a flat sheet parallel to (001). Between these sheets 3-chloro-4-isopropoxyphenyl groups are linked by C—H···Cl and C—H···O hydrogen bonds, generating a three-dimensional network structure of molecules stacked along a.

Comparison of crystal structures reveals that (II) is more loosely packed than (I). There are significant differences in the van der Waals radii of the Br and Cl atoms (1.85 and 1.75 Å, respectively; Bondi, 1964) which is reflected in the C—X bond distances [C13—Br1 = 1.8945 (18) Å in (I); C13—Cl1 1.7396 (16) Å in (II)]. However, the effective volume of the molecule in (II) estimated by V/Z is larger by ca 4% than that for (I). This suggests that the nearly coplanar arrangement of the hydantoin groups in (II) is favorable for the formation of N—H···O hydrogen bonds as seen from Table 2, but it also results in looser molecular packing.

Structures of 5-phenyl-5-alkyl­hydantoin derivatives have been investigated to review the relationships between the absolute configuration and optical activity. Knabe & Wunn (1980) determined the absolute configurations of 5,5-disubstituted hydantoins based on their chemical syntheses. According to this assignment, the structure of S-(+)-5-phenyl-5-ethyl­hydantoin was reported (Coquerel et al., 1993). Ferron et al. (2006) determined the configuration of (R)-(-)-5-p-methyl­phenyl-5-methyl­hydantoin in a chlathrate compound with permethyl­ated β-cyclo­dextrin based on the known absolute configuration of the host. Martin et al. (2011) prepared the diastereomeric salt of (S)-(+)-5-phenyl-5-tri­fluoro­methyl­hydantoin with (+)-α-methyl­benzyl­amine to determine the configuration based on the known absolute configuration of the chiral amine. It is noted that the R and S notation remains unchanged when CH3 at the 5-position of the hydantoin is replaced with CF3, although the priorities of the substituents in the sequence rule are altered. To our knowledge, the present paper is the first to report the absolute configuration of such compounds determined from anomalous-dispersion effects.

Several 2-oxochromene derivatives of chiral hydantoin molecules show liver X receptor β-selective agonists activity (Matsuda et al., 2015; Koura, Matsuda et al., 2015).

Synthesis and crystallization top

Compounds (I) and (II) were prepared from the corresponding (+)-non-halogeno-derivatives, which were separated from a racemic mixture (Koura, Sumida et al., 2015). Prismatic crystals of (I) were grown from ethyl­acetate solution. The specific rotation, [α]D, of (I) at 293 K is +79.7° (c = 0.98, MeOH, where c is the concentration of units gram per 100 cm−3).

Plate-like crystals of (II) were grown from ethyl­acetate solution. The specific rotation, [α]D, of (II) at 293 K is +81.4° (c = 1.0, MeOH).

Refinement details top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. Intensity data were collected in a full sphere. All H atoms bound to C and N were positioned geometrically. They were refined as riding, with N—H = 0.88 Å, C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å, and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C/N) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C)for methyl hydrogen atoms. The thermal displacement ellipsoids of the non-hydrogen atoms of the isoprop­oxy group in (II) are larger than those in (I), suggesting some positional disorder, which was not taken into account in the refinement.

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2014); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2014); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2014); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), showing displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The molecular structure of (II), showing displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The crystal structure of (I), projected along a. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. A schematic drawing of the N—H···O hydrogen-bonding network in (I). The arrows indicate the twofold screw axes along a.
[Figure 5] Fig. 5. The crystal structure of (II), projected along a. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines.
(I) (S)-(+)-5-(3-Bromo-4-isopropoxyphenyl)-5-methylimidazolidine-2,4-dione top
Crystal data top
C13H15BrN2O3Dx = 1.576 Mg m3
Mr = 327.17Melting point = 480–485 K
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.1840 (3) ÅCell parameters from 9747 reflections
b = 9.6495 (4) Åθ = 2.8–27.9°
c = 23.1111 (10) ŵ = 2.99 mm1
V = 1379.10 (11) Å3T = 90 K
Z = 4Prism, colorless
F(000) = 6640.25 × 0.25 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D8 VENTURE
diffractometer
3206 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.028
Absorption correction: integration
(SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
θmax = 27.9°, θmin = 2.3°
Tmin = 0.482, Tmax = 0.631h = 88
31000 measured reflectionsk = 1212
3271 independent reflectionsl = 3030
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.017 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0213P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.047(Δ/σ)max = 0.009
S = 1.29Δρmax = 0.41 e Å3
3271 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
175 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1301 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013).
0 restraintsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.018 (2)
Crystal data top
C13H15BrN2O3V = 1379.10 (11) Å3
Mr = 327.17Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 6.1840 (3) ŵ = 2.99 mm1
b = 9.6495 (4) ÅT = 90 K
c = 23.1111 (10) Å0.25 × 0.25 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D8 VENTURE
diffractometer
3271 independent reflections
Absorption correction: integration
(SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
3206 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.482, Tmax = 0.631Rint = 0.028
31000 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.017H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.047Δρmax = 0.41 e Å3
S = 1.29Δρmin = 0.30 e Å3
3271 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1301 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013).
175 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.018 (2)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.51609 (3)0.26559 (2)0.22060 (2)0.01790 (7)
O20.9092 (2)0.43196 (15)0.19710 (6)0.0164 (3)
O30.9534 (2)0.63884 (14)0.53560 (6)0.0173 (3)
O40.6551 (2)0.25613 (14)0.45199 (6)0.0169 (3)
N50.7120 (3)0.61559 (17)0.45986 (7)0.0125 (3)
H50.68850.70370.45240.015*
N60.8462 (3)0.42583 (17)0.49936 (6)0.0128 (3)
H60.93030.37280.52060.015*
C70.6083 (3)0.5027 (2)0.42851 (8)0.0114 (4)
C80.8471 (3)0.5712 (2)0.50139 (8)0.0115 (4)
C90.7001 (3)0.3769 (2)0.46070 (8)0.0111 (4)
C100.3625 (3)0.5093 (3)0.43412 (9)0.0200 (5)
H10A0.32260.51170.47510.030*
H10B0.29820.42730.41590.030*
H10C0.30870.59300.41490.030*
C110.6865 (3)0.4922 (2)0.36572 (8)0.0112 (4)
C120.5853 (3)0.4017 (2)0.32744 (8)0.0124 (4)
H120.46230.35040.33960.015*
C130.6632 (3)0.38634 (19)0.27186 (8)0.0120 (4)
C140.8446 (4)0.4577 (2)0.25237 (8)0.0129 (4)
C150.9471 (3)0.5475 (2)0.29057 (8)0.0143 (4)
H151.07110.59780.27840.017*
C160.8682 (3)0.5640 (2)0.34672 (8)0.0127 (4)
H160.94000.62540.37250.015*
C171.0475 (3)0.5314 (2)0.16795 (8)0.0151 (4)
H171.17670.55210.19250.018*
C181.1172 (4)0.4592 (2)0.11306 (9)0.0216 (5)
H18A1.20270.37700.12290.032*
H18B1.20510.52250.08970.032*
H18C0.98910.43130.09100.032*
C190.9230 (4)0.6638 (2)0.15599 (9)0.0219 (5)
H19A0.79660.64280.13200.033*
H19B1.01660.72960.13560.033*
H19C0.87530.70460.19270.033*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.01843 (11)0.02073 (11)0.01453 (11)0.00651 (8)0.00120 (7)0.00500 (7)
O20.0215 (8)0.0166 (7)0.0111 (7)0.0051 (6)0.0047 (6)0.0007 (5)
O30.0203 (8)0.0145 (6)0.0171 (7)0.0051 (6)0.0050 (6)0.0011 (5)
O40.0232 (7)0.0104 (7)0.0171 (7)0.0064 (6)0.0049 (5)0.0012 (6)
N50.0172 (9)0.0074 (8)0.0129 (8)0.0014 (7)0.0020 (7)0.0007 (6)
N60.0138 (9)0.0097 (8)0.0147 (8)0.0011 (7)0.0025 (7)0.0020 (6)
C70.0103 (9)0.0103 (10)0.0138 (9)0.0009 (8)0.0015 (7)0.0032 (8)
C80.0102 (9)0.0110 (9)0.0131 (9)0.0011 (7)0.0018 (7)0.0011 (7)
C90.0120 (9)0.0125 (9)0.0086 (8)0.0010 (7)0.0053 (7)0.0002 (7)
C100.0118 (10)0.0313 (14)0.0170 (10)0.0040 (9)0.0005 (8)0.0040 (10)
C110.0117 (9)0.0110 (9)0.0111 (9)0.0025 (8)0.0012 (7)0.0007 (7)
C120.0103 (9)0.0124 (9)0.0145 (9)0.0008 (7)0.0004 (7)0.0009 (7)
C130.0128 (9)0.0113 (9)0.0120 (9)0.0008 (7)0.0047 (7)0.0017 (7)
C140.0144 (10)0.0121 (9)0.0123 (9)0.0014 (8)0.0002 (7)0.0006 (7)
C150.0127 (9)0.0140 (9)0.0161 (9)0.0028 (7)0.0010 (7)0.0015 (7)
C160.0125 (9)0.0113 (9)0.0144 (9)0.0005 (7)0.0028 (8)0.0017 (7)
C170.0131 (10)0.0164 (9)0.0157 (9)0.0021 (8)0.0024 (8)0.0010 (7)
C180.0244 (11)0.0216 (11)0.0187 (10)0.0010 (9)0.0079 (9)0.0008 (9)
C190.0263 (12)0.0199 (11)0.0196 (10)0.0036 (9)0.0032 (9)0.0015 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br1—C131.8945 (18)C11—C121.392 (3)
O2—C141.361 (2)C12—C131.380 (3)
O2—C171.451 (2)C12—H120.9500
O3—C81.218 (2)C13—C141.391 (3)
O4—C91.215 (2)C14—C151.390 (3)
N5—C81.343 (2)C15—C161.395 (3)
N5—C71.457 (3)C15—H150.9500
N5—H50.8800C16—H160.9500
N6—C91.355 (2)C17—C181.510 (3)
N6—C81.403 (2)C17—C191.518 (3)
N6—H60.8800C17—H171.0000
C7—C101.527 (3)C18—H18A0.9800
C7—C91.532 (3)C18—H18B0.9800
C7—C111.533 (2)C18—H18C0.9800
C10—H10A0.9800C19—H19A0.9800
C10—H10B0.9800C19—H19B0.9800
C10—H10C0.9800C19—H19C0.9800
C11—C161.391 (3)
C14—O2—C17119.19 (16)C12—C13—C14121.99 (17)
C8—N5—C7112.98 (16)C12—C13—Br1118.72 (14)
C8—N5—H5123.5C14—C13—Br1119.29 (14)
C7—N5—H5123.5O2—C14—C15125.17 (19)
C9—N6—C8111.90 (16)O2—C14—C13116.75 (17)
C9—N6—H6124.1C15—C14—C13118.06 (17)
C8—N6—H6124.1C14—C15—C16120.16 (19)
N5—C7—C10111.38 (18)C14—C15—H15119.9
N5—C7—C9100.82 (14)C16—C15—H15119.9
C10—C7—C9111.14 (19)C11—C16—C15121.28 (18)
N5—C7—C11112.40 (17)C11—C16—H16119.4
C10—C7—C11113.38 (17)C15—C16—H16119.4
C9—C7—C11106.91 (15)O2—C17—C18104.66 (16)
O3—C8—N5128.94 (19)O2—C17—C19110.02 (17)
O3—C8—N6124.06 (18)C18—C17—C19112.35 (17)
N5—C8—N6107.00 (16)O2—C17—H17109.9
O4—C9—N6126.56 (18)C18—C17—H17109.9
O4—C9—C7126.47 (18)C19—C17—H17109.9
N6—C9—C7106.94 (16)C17—C18—H18A109.5
C7—C10—H10A109.5C17—C18—H18B109.5
C7—C10—H10B109.5H18A—C18—H18B109.5
H10A—C10—H10B109.5C17—C18—H18C109.5
C7—C10—H10C109.5H18A—C18—H18C109.5
H10A—C10—H10C109.5H18B—C18—H18C109.5
H10B—C10—H10C109.5C17—C19—H19A109.5
C16—C11—C12118.35 (17)C17—C19—H19B109.5
C16—C11—C7121.39 (17)H19A—C19—H19B109.5
C12—C11—C7120.08 (17)C17—C19—H19C109.5
C13—C12—C11120.15 (18)H19A—C19—H19C109.5
C13—C12—H12119.9H19B—C19—H19C109.5
C11—C12—H12119.9
C8—N5—C7—C10120.1 (2)C10—C7—C11—C1244.5 (3)
C8—N5—C7—C92.12 (19)C9—C7—C11—C1278.3 (2)
C8—N5—C7—C11111.41 (18)C16—C11—C12—C131.0 (3)
C7—N5—C8—O3178.24 (19)C7—C11—C12—C13176.27 (17)
C7—N5—C8—N61.4 (2)C11—C12—C13—C140.9 (3)
C9—N6—C8—O3174.64 (18)C11—C12—C13—Br1178.41 (14)
C9—N6—C8—N55.1 (2)C17—O2—C14—C1520.8 (3)
C8—N6—C9—O4175.63 (19)C17—O2—C14—C13160.16 (18)
C8—N6—C9—C76.4 (2)C12—C13—C14—O2178.61 (17)
N5—C7—C9—O4176.99 (19)Br1—C13—C14—O22.1 (2)
C10—C7—C9—O458.8 (3)C12—C13—C14—C150.5 (3)
C11—C7—C9—O465.4 (2)Br1—C13—C14—C15178.87 (15)
N5—C7—C9—N65.00 (18)O2—C14—C15—C16178.87 (18)
C10—C7—C9—N6123.16 (18)C13—C14—C15—C160.1 (3)
C11—C7—C9—N6112.63 (17)C12—C11—C16—C150.7 (3)
N5—C7—C11—C1612.9 (3)C7—C11—C16—C15175.87 (18)
C10—C7—C11—C16140.4 (2)C14—C15—C16—C110.2 (3)
C9—C7—C11—C1696.8 (2)C14—O2—C17—C18170.47 (16)
N5—C7—C11—C12171.94 (16)C14—O2—C17—C1968.6 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C18—H18B···O4i0.982.603.529 (3)158
C15—H15···Br1i0.953.023.939 (2)162
N6—H6···O4ii0.881.972.828 (2)165
N5—H5···O3iii0.882.122.861 (2)141
Symmetry codes: (i) x+2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (iii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1.
(II) (S)-(+)-5-(3-Chloro-4-isopropoxyphenyl)-5-methylimidazolidine-2,4-dione top
Crystal data top
C13H15ClN2O3Dx = 1.311 Mg m3
Mr = 282.72Melting point = 475–477 K
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.1397 (3) ÅCell parameters from 9929 reflections
b = 10.0128 (4) Åθ = 2.9–27.9°
c = 20.0431 (8) ŵ = 0.27 mm1
V = 1432.85 (10) Å3T = 90 K
Z = 4Plate, colorless
F(000) = 5920.27 × 0.27 × 0.21 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D8 VENTURE
diffractometer
3350 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.023
Absorption correction: integration
(SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
θmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.3°
Tmin = 0.916, Tmax = 0.954h = 99
32943 measured reflectionsk = 1313
3425 independent reflectionsl = 2626
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0389P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.079(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.68Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
3425 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.22 e Å3
175 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1385 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013).
0 restraintsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.009 (8)
Crystal data top
C13H15ClN2O3V = 1432.85 (10) Å3
Mr = 282.72Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 7.1397 (3) ŵ = 0.27 mm1
b = 10.0128 (4) ÅT = 90 K
c = 20.0431 (8) Å0.27 × 0.27 × 0.21 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D8 VENTURE
diffractometer
3425 independent reflections
Absorption correction: integration
(SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
3350 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.916, Tmax = 0.954Rint = 0.023
32943 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.079Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
S = 1.68Δρmin = 0.22 e Å3
3425 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1385 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013).
175 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.009 (8)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.27670 (6)0.69656 (4)0.65403 (2)0.02286 (13)
O20.3090 (2)0.46523 (14)0.73500 (6)0.0401 (4)
O31.27973 (17)0.36910 (11)0.49720 (6)0.0240 (3)
O40.88769 (16)0.72460 (10)0.52129 (5)0.0149 (2)
N50.95990 (18)0.37992 (12)0.51449 (7)0.0153 (3)
H50.93490.29420.51840.018*
N61.11959 (17)0.56832 (12)0.50854 (6)0.0149 (3)
H61.21590.62280.50520.018*
C70.81752 (19)0.48393 (14)0.51642 (7)0.0122 (3)
C81.1342 (2)0.42885 (15)0.50598 (8)0.0160 (3)
C90.9406 (2)0.60975 (14)0.51672 (7)0.0121 (3)
C100.7029 (2)0.48536 (16)0.45165 (8)0.0178 (3)
H10A0.78740.49510.41340.027*
H10B0.61480.56040.45260.027*
H10C0.63310.40150.44760.027*
C110.6927 (2)0.47604 (15)0.57820 (7)0.0138 (3)
C120.5631 (2)0.57769 (15)0.58963 (7)0.0154 (3)
H120.56020.65310.56090.018*
C130.4397 (2)0.56974 (16)0.64193 (8)0.0176 (3)
C140.4386 (3)0.46071 (18)0.68561 (8)0.0250 (4)
C150.5703 (3)0.3610 (2)0.67485 (9)0.0308 (4)
H150.57500.28640.70410.037*
C160.6959 (2)0.36877 (17)0.62175 (8)0.0219 (3)
H160.78490.29940.61530.026*
C170.2730 (3)0.3480 (2)0.77469 (9)0.0359 (5)
H170.39490.31070.79070.043*
C180.1633 (3)0.4001 (3)0.83411 (10)0.0452 (6)
H18A0.23560.47010.85650.068*
H18B0.13970.32670.86540.068*
H18C0.04360.43700.81880.068*
C190.1706 (4)0.2430 (3)0.73698 (14)0.0619 (8)
H19A0.05870.28180.71640.093*
H19B0.13360.17120.76750.093*
H19C0.25220.20650.70210.093*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0193 (2)0.0269 (2)0.02235 (19)0.00684 (16)0.00608 (15)0.00032 (15)
O20.0438 (9)0.0423 (8)0.0342 (7)0.0146 (7)0.0254 (7)0.0183 (6)
O30.0127 (5)0.0138 (5)0.0455 (7)0.0033 (5)0.0032 (6)0.0029 (5)
O40.0150 (5)0.0099 (5)0.0197 (5)0.0024 (4)0.0012 (4)0.0004 (4)
N50.0117 (6)0.0068 (6)0.0276 (7)0.0001 (5)0.0028 (5)0.0005 (5)
N60.0098 (6)0.0087 (6)0.0264 (6)0.0009 (5)0.0009 (5)0.0012 (5)
C70.0099 (7)0.0097 (6)0.0169 (7)0.0002 (5)0.0005 (5)0.0004 (5)
C80.0141 (7)0.0116 (7)0.0223 (7)0.0008 (6)0.0010 (6)0.0003 (6)
C90.0119 (7)0.0125 (7)0.0120 (6)0.0020 (5)0.0002 (5)0.0008 (5)
C100.0146 (7)0.0214 (8)0.0175 (7)0.0030 (6)0.0018 (6)0.0007 (6)
C110.0106 (7)0.0153 (7)0.0156 (6)0.0015 (5)0.0003 (5)0.0010 (5)
C120.0144 (7)0.0156 (7)0.0160 (7)0.0003 (6)0.0005 (6)0.0031 (6)
C130.0141 (7)0.0192 (7)0.0195 (7)0.0036 (6)0.0008 (6)0.0007 (6)
C140.0263 (9)0.0285 (9)0.0201 (8)0.0049 (8)0.0087 (7)0.0088 (7)
C150.0338 (10)0.0295 (9)0.0292 (9)0.0090 (9)0.0097 (8)0.0167 (8)
C160.0213 (8)0.0206 (8)0.0238 (8)0.0050 (7)0.0021 (7)0.0076 (6)
C170.0293 (10)0.0476 (11)0.0307 (9)0.0059 (9)0.0117 (9)0.0219 (9)
C180.0439 (13)0.0628 (15)0.0288 (10)0.0004 (11)0.0148 (9)0.0171 (10)
C190.0543 (17)0.0669 (17)0.0646 (16)0.0140 (14)0.0265 (14)0.0055 (14)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl1—C131.7396 (16)C11—C121.395 (2)
O2—C141.355 (2)C12—C131.371 (2)
O2—C171.441 (2)C12—H120.9500
O3—C81.2121 (18)C13—C141.399 (2)
O4—C91.2139 (18)C14—C151.389 (3)
N5—C81.3479 (19)C15—C161.394 (2)
N5—C71.4558 (18)C15—H150.9500
N5—H50.8800C16—H160.9500
N6—C91.3536 (19)C17—C191.487 (3)
N6—C81.4014 (19)C17—C181.518 (3)
N6—H60.8800C17—H171.0000
C7—C111.5277 (19)C18—H18A0.9800
C7—C101.535 (2)C18—H18B0.9800
C7—C91.5360 (19)C18—H18C0.9800
C10—H10A0.9800C19—H19A0.9800
C10—H10B0.9800C19—H19B0.9800
C10—H10C0.9800C19—H19C0.9800
C11—C161.384 (2)
C14—O2—C17119.87 (16)C12—C13—C14121.82 (15)
C8—N5—C7112.83 (12)C12—C13—Cl1119.59 (12)
C8—N5—H5123.6C14—C13—Cl1118.57 (12)
C7—N5—H5123.6O2—C14—C15126.84 (16)
C9—N6—C8112.33 (13)O2—C14—C13115.78 (16)
C9—N6—H6123.8C15—C14—C13117.37 (15)
C8—N6—H6123.8C14—C15—C16120.93 (16)
N5—C7—C11113.08 (12)C14—C15—H15119.5
N5—C7—C10110.89 (12)C16—C15—H15119.5
C11—C7—C10112.02 (12)C11—C16—C15120.96 (16)
N5—C7—C9100.80 (11)C11—C16—H16119.5
C11—C7—C9111.90 (11)C15—C16—H16119.5
C10—C7—C9107.50 (12)O2—C17—C19112.53 (18)
O3—C8—N5129.09 (13)O2—C17—C18104.23 (17)
O3—C8—N6124.11 (14)C19—C17—C18112.8 (2)
N5—C8—N6106.80 (13)O2—C17—H17109.0
O4—C9—N6126.38 (14)C19—C17—H17109.0
O4—C9—C7126.82 (14)C18—C17—H17109.0
N6—C9—C7106.75 (12)C17—C18—H18A109.5
C7—C10—H10A109.5C17—C18—H18B109.5
C7—C10—H10B109.5H18A—C18—H18B109.5
H10A—C10—H10B109.5C17—C18—H18C109.5
C7—C10—H10C109.5H18A—C18—H18C109.5
H10A—C10—H10C109.5H18B—C18—H18C109.5
H10B—C10—H10C109.5C17—C19—H19A109.5
C16—C11—C12118.27 (14)C17—C19—H19B109.5
C16—C11—C7122.80 (14)H19A—C19—H19B109.5
C12—C11—C7118.85 (12)C17—C19—H19C109.5
C13—C12—C11120.62 (13)H19A—C19—H19C109.5
C13—C12—H12119.7H19B—C19—H19C109.5
C11—C12—H12119.7
C8—N5—C7—C11126.78 (14)C10—C7—C11—C1260.26 (17)
C8—N5—C7—C10106.43 (14)C9—C7—C11—C1260.55 (17)
C8—N5—C7—C97.18 (15)C16—C11—C12—C131.3 (2)
C7—N5—C8—O3173.72 (17)C7—C11—C12—C13175.49 (14)
C7—N5—C8—N65.83 (18)C11—C12—C13—C140.0 (2)
C9—N6—C8—O3178.00 (15)C11—C12—C13—Cl1178.80 (11)
C9—N6—C8—N51.57 (19)C17—O2—C14—C1512.6 (3)
C8—N6—C9—O4179.17 (14)C17—O2—C14—C13168.51 (17)
C8—N6—C9—C72.93 (18)C12—C13—C14—O2179.76 (16)
N5—C7—C9—O4176.28 (14)Cl1—C13—C14—O20.9 (2)
C11—C7—C9—O455.83 (19)C12—C13—C14—C151.2 (3)
C10—C7—C9—O467.57 (18)Cl1—C13—C14—C15179.94 (15)
N5—C7—C9—N65.83 (15)O2—C14—C15—C16179.90 (18)
C11—C7—C9—N6126.28 (13)C13—C14—C15—C161.2 (3)
C10—C7—C9—N6110.32 (13)C12—C11—C16—C151.3 (2)
N5—C7—C11—C169.8 (2)C7—C11—C16—C15175.34 (16)
C10—C7—C11—C16116.38 (16)C14—C15—C16—C110.0 (3)
C9—C7—C11—C16122.81 (15)C14—O2—C17—C1971.8 (2)
N5—C7—C11—C12173.55 (13)C14—O2—C17—C18165.63 (17)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5···O3i0.882.002.8155 (16)154
N6—H6···O4ii0.882.032.8845 (16)163
C12—H12···O40.952.573.0679 (19)113
C12—H12···O4iii0.952.393.2294 (18)147
C17—H17···Cl1iv1.002.833.831 (2)175
C18—H18B···O4iv0.982.503.409 (2)154
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (ii) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+1; (iii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1; (iv) x+1, y1/2, z+3/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) for (I) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C18—H18B···O4i0.982.603.529 (3)158.4
C15—H15···Br1i0.953.023.939 (2)162.4
N6—H6···O4ii0.881.972.828 (2)164.6
N5—H5···O3iii0.882.122.861 (2)141.2
Symmetry codes: (i) x+2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (iii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) for (II) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5···O3i0.882.002.8155 (16)153.6
N6—H6···O4ii0.882.032.8845 (16)163.4
C12—H12···O40.952.573.0679 (19)112.9
C12—H12···O4iii0.952.393.2294 (18)146.6
C17—H17···Cl1iv1.002.833.831 (2)175.0
C18—H18B···O4iv0.982.503.409 (2)154.4
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (ii) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+1; (iii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1; (iv) x+1, y1/2, z+3/2.

Experimental details

(I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC13H15BrN2O3C13H15ClN2O3
Mr327.17282.72
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121Orthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)9090
a, b, c (Å)6.1840 (3), 9.6495 (4), 23.1111 (10)7.1397 (3), 10.0128 (4), 20.0431 (8)
V3)1379.10 (11)1432.85 (10)
Z44
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.990.27
Crystal size (mm)0.25 × 0.25 × 0.100.27 × 0.27 × 0.21
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker D8 VENTUREBruker D8 VENTURE
Absorption correctionIntegration
(SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
Integration
(SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
Tmin, Tmax0.482, 0.6310.916, 0.954
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
31000, 3271, 3206 32943, 3425, 3350
Rint0.0280.023
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.6590.660
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.017, 0.047, 1.29 0.027, 0.079, 1.68
No. of reflections32713425
No. of parameters175175
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.41, 0.300.28, 0.22
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 1301 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013).Flack x determined using 1385 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013).
Absolute structure parameter0.018 (2)0.009 (8)

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2014), SAINT (Bruker, 2014), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

 

References

First citationBondi, A. (1964). J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441–451.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2014). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationCoquerel, G., Petit, M. N. & Robert, F. (1993). Acta Cryst. C49, 824–825.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFerron, L., Guillen, F., Coste, S., Coquerel, G. & Plaquevent, J.-C. (2006). Chirality, 18, 662–666.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationFlack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKnabe, J. & Wunn, W. (1980). Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 313, 538–543.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationKoura, M., Matsuda, T., Okuda, A., Watanabe, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., Kurobuchi, S., Matsumoto, Y. & Shibuya, K. (2015). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 2668–2674.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationKoura, M., Sumida, H., Yamazaki, Y. & Shibuya, K. (2016). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 27, 63–68.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMartin, T., Massif, C., Wermester, N., Linol, J., Tisse, S., Cardinael, P., Coquerel, G. & Bouillon, J.-P. (2011). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 22, 12–21.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMatsuda, T., Okuda, A., Watanabe, Y., Miura, T., Ozawa, H., Tosaka, A., Yamazaki, K., Yamaguchi, Y., Kurobuchi, S., Koura, M. & Shibuya, K. (2015). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 1274–1278.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationParsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 72| Part 2| February 2016| Pages 184-187
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds