view article
Figure 2
A comparison of the observed conformers for the title compound, viewed down the Cl—Sn—O axis (top: the previously known polymorph; bottom: the new P21 polymorph). Note the different orientations observed for the apical DMSO mol­ecule. The calculated powder patterns displayed on the right show that both polymorphs are crystallographically very different. Patterns were calculated with Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008BB5; 5 < 2θ < 40°, λ = 1.54056 Å, FWHM = 0.2°).

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 74| Part 2| February 2018| Pages 163-166
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018000439
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS