research communications
Hydrothermal synthesis and μ3-3,4-diaminobenzoato)manganese], a layered coordination polymer
of poly[bis(aDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan, bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, England, cDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, Texas 78712, USA, and dDepartment of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland
*Correspondence e-mail: w.harrison@abdn.ac.uk
The hydrothermal synthesis and μ3-3,4-diaminobenzoato-κ3N3,O,O′)manganese(II)], [Mn(C7H7N2O2)2]n, are described. The Mn2+ cation (site symmetry ) adopts a tetragonally elongated trans-MnN2O4 octahedral coordination geometry and the μ3-N,O,O′ ligand (bonding from both carboxylate O atoms and the meta-N atom) links the metal ions into infinite (10) layers. The packing is consolidated by intra-layer N—H⋯O and inter-layer N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. The structure of the title compound is compared with other complexes containing the C7H7N2O2− anion and those of the related M(C8H8NO2)2 (M = Mn, Co, Ni, Zn) family, where C8H8NO2− is the 3-amino-4-methylbenzoate anion.
of the title two-dimensional coordination polymer, poly[bis(Keywords: manganese; ligand; layered structure; coordination polymer; crystal structure.
CCDC reference: 2004911
1. Chemical context
The benzoate anion, C7H5O2−, is a classic ligand in coordination chemistry, with over 1500 crystal structures reported in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom et al., 2016) for complexes of first-row transition metals, which include monodentate (κO), chelating (κ2O,O′) and bridging (μ2-O,O′) modes for the ligand [for ligand bonding-mode notation, see Janicki et al. (2017)]. Functionalized benzoate derivatives add further structural variety: for example, –NH2 substituents at the ortho, meta and/or para positions of the benzene ring can form or accept hydrogen bonds with respect to nearby acceptor or donor groups and/or bond to another metal ion (i.e., as a possible μ2-N,O or μ3-N,O,O′ bridging ligand).
As part of our ongoing studies in this area (Khosa et al., 2015), we now describe the hydrothermal synthesis and of the title compound (I), where C7H7N2O2− is the 3,4-diaminobenzoate (dbz−) anion.
2. Structural commentary
The title complex (I) consists of an Mn2+ cation located on a crystallographic inversion centre and one deprotonated dbz− ligand with its atoms lying on general positions (Fig. 1), which of course generates the overall 1:2 metal to ligand ratio and ensures charge balance. The C7/O1/O2 carboxylate group of the ligand is rotated from the plane of the C1–C6 aromatic ring by 13.5 (2)° and the C—O bonds [C7—O1 = 1.261 (3) Å and C7—O2 = 1.277 (3) Å] are of similar length, indicating substantial electronic delocalization. The C2—C3 and C5—C6 bonds (mean = 1.383 Å) are marginally shorter than the other bonds in the benzene ring (mean = 1.396 Å), which can be related to resonance of the para-N atom lone pair with the carboxylate group (Mukombiwa & Harrison, 2020). This is also presumably reflected in the fact that the C4—N2 bond length [1.413 (3) Å] is slightly shorter than C3—N1 [1.432 (3) Å]. Even so, it is noteworthy that the bond-angle sums about atoms N1 and N2 of 329.8 and 335.8°, respectively, are indicative of a significant tendency towards sp3 of the N atoms, i.e., localization of the lone pairs. In terms of the non-hydrogen atoms attached to the benzene ring, N1 and N2 deviate slightly from the mean plane of the ring in opposite directions by −0.023 (3) and 0.024 (3) Å, respectively, whereas atom C7 shows a larger deviation of −0.077 (3) Å.
The dbz− ligand bonds to three different metal ions from both of its carboxylate O atoms and also from its meta-N atom (Fig. 1), i.e., μ3-N,O,O′ mode. The preference for the meta-N atom to bond to the metal ion (rather than the para-N atom) can be related to the noted in the previous paragraph. With respect to the carboxylate group, the metal ion bonded to O1 is displaced in an `upwards' sense by 1.046 (7) Å and the other (bonded to O2) is displaced `downwards' by −1.651 (6) Å.
Crystal symmetry generates a centrosymmetric trans-MnN2O4 elongated octahedron for the metal ion, in which the Mn1—N1 bond length of 2.3065 (19) Å is distinctly longer than the Mn1—O1 [2.1591 (14) Å] and Mn1—O2 [2.2062 (15) Å] bonds. The manganese ion presumably has a high-spin 3d5 configuration, thus the distortion of the octahedron cannot be electronic in nature (i.e.: a Jahn–Teller effect) and might arise for steric reasons. The angular variance (Robinson et al., 1971) of the cis X—Mn—Y (X, Y = N, O) bond angles is (7.7°)2, indicating relatively little angular distortion from the ideal values of 90°; the minimum and maximum angles are 86.75 (6) and 93.25 (6)°, respectively. The trans bond angles are constrained by symmetry to be 180°. The bond-valence sum (in valence units) (Brown & Altermatt, 1985) for the metal ion is 1.97, in very good agreement with the expected value of 2.00 for Mn2+.
In the extended structure of (I), the μ3 bridging ligand links the metal ions into infinite (10) sheets (Fig. 2). These sheets can be decomposed into [010] chains of octahedra linked by the bridging C7/O1/O2 carboxylate groups [shortest Mn⋯Mn(x, y + 1, z) separation = 4.4212 (2) Å], with connectivity in the [101] direction achieved via the benzene ring of the ligands and their meta-N atoms [shortest Mn⋯Mn(−x + , y + , −z + ) = 8.1520 (4) Å].
Hydrogen bonding helps to consolidate the structure of (I): the para –N2H2 group forms an intra-sheet N2—H4N⋯O2iii bond (Fig. 1 and Table 1, where symmetry codes are defined) but also participates in an inter-sheet N2—H3N⋯N2ii link, i.e., N2 `accepts its own hydrogen bond' from an adjacent symmetry related –N2H2 group and C(2) infinite chains propagating in the [010] direction arise in the crystal (Figs. 1 and 2) with adjacent N atoms related by the 21 screw axis; it is notable that the –NH2 groups in adjacent layers are aligned opposite to each other to facilitate the formation of this inter-sheet hydrogen bond. As well as forming a coordinate bond to the metal ion from N1, the meta –N1H2 group forms an N1—H1N⋯O1i intra-sheet hydrogen bond while the N1—H2N group does not participate in a hydrogen bond, perhaps due to steric crowding. There are no significant aromatic π–π stacking interactions in the crystal of (I), the shortest centroid–centroid separation between C1–C6 rings being 4.4211 (13) Å.
3. Hirshfeld surface analysis
In order to gain further insight into non-covalent interactions in the crystal of (I), the Hirshfeld surface and two-dimensional fingerprint plots were calculated using CrystalExplorer (Turner et al., 2017) following the approach recently described by Tan et al. (2019). The Hirshfeld surface of the dbz−anion in (I) (see supporting information) largely shows the expected red spots of varying intensity corresponding to close contacts resulting from the O—Mn and N—Mn coordinate bonds and N—H⋯O and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds described above. The Hirshfeld surface mapped onto dnorm for the manganese cation in (I) (Fig. 3) is a distinctive `dimpled cube', with the intense red spots (short interactions) corresponding to its coordinate bonds, which correlates nicely with its octahedral coordination geometry.
The most important outward (i.e., non-reciprocal) percentage contributions of the different type of contacts for the anion and the cation are listed in Table 2. It may be seen that H⋯H (van der Waals) contacts are by far the most significant contributor for the anion followed by C⋯H and H⋯C contacts (total contribution = 59.9%). The contacts associated with the hydrogen bonds, i.e., H⋯N (donor), H⋯O (donor), N⋯H (acceptor) and O⋯H (acceptor) collectively account for some 24.2% of the surface. Finally, the coordinate bonds to the metal ion (O—Mn and N—Mn), despite their presumed importance in establishing the account for a modest 7.2% of the anion's surface.
|
As might be expected, the Mn—O contacts (62.0%) for the cation dominate its Hirshfeld surface, followed by Mn—N (19.3%), but the ratio of these (∼3.2:1) deviates significantly from the simple 2:1 ratio that would reflect the four Mn—O bonds and two Mn—N bonds. The high percentage of Mn⋯H contacts (18.8%) is notable: these occur at the corners of its cube-like Hirshfeld surface (Fig. 3) and seem to arise from the proximity to the metal ion of the two H atoms attached to N1 [Mn1⋯H1N = 2.58 (3); Mn1⋯H2N = 2.68 (3) Å] and might be repulsive in nature. For further discussion of short metal⋯hydrogen contacts in coordination compounds and their Hirshfeld surfaces, see Pinto et al. (2019).
The wing-like two-dimensional fingerprint plot for the manganese cation in (I) (Fig. 4) shows two prominent features: the spike ending at (di, de) = (∼1.14, ∼1.06 Å) and extending backwards corresponds to the Mn—O coordinate bonds and the (1.18, 1.14 Å) feature just separated from it equates with the Mn—N bonds. The Mn⋯H contacts are overlapped with the Mn—O and Mn—N contacts in the main body of the `wing' with the shortest Mn⋯H contact at about (1.40, 1.25 Å), which correlates well with the short Mn⋯H contacts noted in the previous paragraph.
4. Database survey
The structure of (I) may firstly be compared with the isostructural M(C8H8NO2)2 family [M = Mn (CCDC refcode ULEZUI) (II), Co (ULIBAU), Ni (ULIBEY) and Zn (ULIBIC)], where C8H8NO2− is the 3-amino-4-methylbenzoate anion (Khosa et al., 2015). These phases contain μ3-N,O,O′ ligands and centrosymmetric MN2O4 octahedra, which generate very similar polymeric layers to those found in (I). In (II), the sheets propagate parallel to the (100) plane of the monoclinic cell due to a different choice of unit-cell setting (see Refinement section). The major difference arises with respect to the para-substituent: in (II) the methyl groups in adjacent (100) layers are laterally shifted with respect to each other (Fig. 5) to avoid an unfavourable close steric contact and there are no directional inter-sheet interactions beyond normal van der Waals' contacts, which compares to the inter-layer N—H⋯N links already mentioned for (I).
Despite its potential as a polyfunctional bridging ligand, just five crystal structures of complexes of the 3,4-diaminobenzoate anion are reported in the Cambridge Structural Database as of March 2020 with sodium (BEHJEE: Rzaczyńska et al., 2003), zinc (MIWSES; Fernández-Palacio et al., 2014), tin (XUPRUV and XUPSAC; Pruchnik et al., 2002) and neodymium (YENKOR; Rzaczyńska et al., 1994). Key data for (I) and these structures are summarized in Table 3, which indicates a wide variety of metal coordination polyhedra, ligand bonding modes and topologies. Unlike the isostructural manganese and zinc phases in the M(C8H8NO2)2 family, MIWSES features a water molecule bonded to the trigonal–bipyramidally coordinated zinc ion and has a quite different overall structure to (I). It may finally be noted that (I) represents the first reported example of a μ3-N,O,O′ bonding mode for the dbz− anion.
5. Synthesis and crystallization
A mixture of 99 mg (0.50 mmol) of MnCl2·4H2O and 152 mg (1.00 mmol) of 3,4-diaminobenzoic acid were added to 1.0 ml of 1 M KOH under stirring. The resulting mixture was heated to 423 K in a 23 ml Teflon-lined autoclave for 10 h. The autoclave was then removed from the oven and cooled to room temperature over several hours and opened. Colourless plates of (I) were recovered by vacuum filtration and rinsed with acetone and dried.
6. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure . The N-bound H atoms were located in difference maps and their positions were freely refined. The C-bound H atoms were geometrically placed (C—H = 0.95 Å) and refined as riding atoms. The constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(carrier) was applied in all cases. The standard setting of the for (I) (i.e., P21/c) in which the polymeric layers would propagate in the (100) plane, as also found for compound (II), has a = 13.975, b = 4.421, c = 15.693 Å and β = 134.77°, but P21/n was chosen here to avoid problems associated with the very obtuse β angle: compare Feast et al. (2009).
details are summarized in Table 4
|
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 2004911
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020006805/is5538sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020006805/is5538Isup2.hkl
Hirshfeld surface of the anion. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020006805/is5538sup3.docx
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell
HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: HKL DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SORTAV (Blessing, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and ATOMS (Shape Software, 2007); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).[Mn(C7H7N2O2)2] | F(000) = 366 |
Mr = 357.23 | Dx = 1.724 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 11.5171 (5) Å | Cell parameters from 5315 reflections |
b = 4.4212 (2) Å | θ = 1.0–26.0° |
c = 13.9752 (7) Å | µ = 0.99 mm−1 |
β = 104.698 (3)° | T = 180 K |
V = 688.32 (6) Å3 | Slab, colourless |
Z = 2 | 0.23 × 0.10 × 0.05 mm |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 1105 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
ω and φ scans | Rint = 0.042 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995) | θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.1° |
Tmin = 0.869, Tmax = 0.983 | h = −14→13 |
5289 measured reflections | k = −5→5 |
1345 independent reflections | l = −17→17 |
Refinement on F2 | Hydrogen site location: mixed |
Least-squares matrix: full | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0282P)2 + 0.509P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.074 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
S = 1.05 | Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 |
1345 reflections | Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3 |
119 parameters | Extinction correction: SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
0 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 0.012 (2) |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Mn1 | 0.000000 | 0.500000 | 0.000000 | 0.01883 (17) | |
C1 | 0.32186 (18) | −0.0488 (5) | 0.11717 (15) | 0.0195 (5) | |
C2 | 0.36414 (18) | 0.1055 (5) | 0.20598 (15) | 0.0198 (5) | |
H2 | 0.312438 | 0.241153 | 0.228031 | 0.024* | |
C3 | 0.48037 (18) | 0.0642 (5) | 0.26264 (15) | 0.0192 (5) | |
C4 | 0.55799 (18) | −0.1335 (5) | 0.23063 (16) | 0.0204 (5) | |
C5 | 0.51634 (19) | −0.2802 (5) | 0.13985 (17) | 0.0254 (5) | |
H5 | 0.568982 | −0.407707 | 0.115733 | 0.030* | |
C6 | 0.39925 (19) | −0.2419 (5) | 0.08470 (16) | 0.0242 (5) | |
H6 | 0.371484 | −0.348284 | 0.024144 | 0.029* | |
C7 | 0.19402 (18) | −0.0122 (5) | 0.06079 (14) | 0.0181 (4) | |
N1 | 0.52161 (17) | 0.2169 (4) | 0.35541 (13) | 0.0205 (4) | |
H1N | 0.482 (2) | 0.387 (6) | 0.3585 (18) | 0.025* | |
H2N | 0.596 (2) | 0.262 (6) | 0.3646 (18) | 0.025* | |
N2 | 0.67763 (16) | −0.1663 (5) | 0.28747 (15) | 0.0229 (4) | |
H3N | 0.716 (2) | −0.306 (6) | 0.2669 (18) | 0.028* | |
H4N | 0.681 (2) | −0.190 (6) | 0.350 (2) | 0.028* | |
O1 | 0.13370 (12) | 0.1975 (3) | 0.08586 (11) | 0.0224 (4) | |
O2 | 0.15011 (13) | −0.1998 (3) | −0.00841 (11) | 0.0229 (4) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Mn1 | 0.0190 (3) | 0.0173 (3) | 0.0187 (3) | 0.00075 (19) | 0.00188 (18) | 0.00021 (19) |
C1 | 0.0194 (10) | 0.0188 (12) | 0.0196 (10) | −0.0010 (8) | 0.0034 (9) | 0.0023 (8) |
C2 | 0.0198 (10) | 0.0176 (11) | 0.0225 (11) | 0.0022 (8) | 0.0064 (9) | 0.0021 (9) |
C3 | 0.0198 (10) | 0.0200 (12) | 0.0171 (10) | −0.0027 (8) | 0.0033 (8) | 0.0013 (8) |
C4 | 0.0165 (10) | 0.0203 (11) | 0.0238 (11) | −0.0015 (9) | 0.0041 (9) | 0.0039 (9) |
C5 | 0.0233 (11) | 0.0276 (13) | 0.0265 (12) | 0.0059 (10) | 0.0088 (9) | −0.0022 (10) |
C6 | 0.0258 (11) | 0.0256 (12) | 0.0201 (11) | 0.0009 (10) | 0.0036 (9) | −0.0028 (9) |
C7 | 0.0198 (10) | 0.0176 (10) | 0.0168 (10) | −0.0030 (9) | 0.0044 (8) | 0.0042 (9) |
N1 | 0.0189 (9) | 0.0182 (10) | 0.0230 (9) | −0.0018 (8) | 0.0027 (8) | −0.0021 (8) |
N2 | 0.0185 (9) | 0.0273 (11) | 0.0232 (10) | 0.0037 (8) | 0.0058 (8) | 0.0013 (9) |
O1 | 0.0208 (8) | 0.0215 (8) | 0.0234 (8) | 0.0047 (6) | 0.0026 (6) | 0.0013 (6) |
O2 | 0.0227 (8) | 0.0232 (8) | 0.0215 (8) | −0.0022 (6) | 0.0031 (6) | −0.0017 (7) |
Mn1—O1 | 2.1591 (14) | C3—N1 | 1.432 (3) |
Mn1—O1i | 2.1591 (14) | C4—C5 | 1.397 (3) |
Mn1—O2ii | 2.2062 (15) | C4—N2 | 1.413 (3) |
Mn1—O2iii | 2.2062 (15) | C5—C6 | 1.383 (3) |
Mn1—N1iv | 2.3065 (19) | C5—H5 | 0.9500 |
Mn1—N1v | 2.3065 (19) | C6—H6 | 0.9500 |
C1—C6 | 1.391 (3) | C7—O1 | 1.261 (3) |
C1—C2 | 1.392 (3) | C7—O2 | 1.277 (3) |
C1—C7 | 1.492 (3) | N1—H1N | 0.88 (3) |
C2—C3 | 1.384 (3) | N1—H2N | 0.86 (3) |
C2—H2 | 0.9500 | N2—H3N | 0.85 (3) |
C3—C4 | 1.402 (3) | N2—H4N | 0.88 (3) |
O1—Mn1—O1i | 180.0 | C5—C4—C3 | 118.65 (19) |
O1—Mn1—O2ii | 93.20 (6) | C5—C4—N2 | 121.6 (2) |
O1i—Mn1—O2ii | 86.80 (6) | C3—C4—N2 | 119.64 (19) |
O1—Mn1—O2iii | 86.80 (6) | C6—C5—C4 | 120.7 (2) |
O1i—Mn1—O2iii | 93.20 (6) | C6—C5—H5 | 119.7 |
O2ii—Mn1—O2iii | 180.0 | C4—C5—H5 | 119.7 |
O1—Mn1—N1iv | 90.52 (6) | C5—C6—C1 | 120.6 (2) |
O1i—Mn1—N1iv | 89.48 (6) | C5—C6—H6 | 119.7 |
O2ii—Mn1—N1iv | 93.25 (6) | C1—C6—H6 | 119.7 |
O2iii—Mn1—N1iv | 86.75 (6) | O1—C7—O2 | 123.23 (18) |
O1—Mn1—N1v | 89.48 (6) | O1—C7—C1 | 118.20 (18) |
O1i—Mn1—N1v | 90.52 (6) | O2—C7—C1 | 118.53 (19) |
O2ii—Mn1—N1v | 86.75 (6) | C3—N1—Mn1vi | 120.83 (14) |
O2iii—Mn1—N1v | 93.25 (6) | C3—N1—H1N | 112.9 (16) |
N1iv—Mn1—N1v | 180.0 | Mn1vi—N1—H1N | 98.0 (16) |
C6—C1—C2 | 118.93 (19) | C3—N1—H2N | 109.6 (17) |
C6—C1—C7 | 121.50 (18) | Mn1vi—N1—H2N | 107.0 (17) |
C2—C1—C7 | 119.54 (19) | H1N—N1—H2N | 107 (2) |
C3—C2—C1 | 121.0 (2) | C4—N2—H3N | 113.5 (17) |
C3—C2—H2 | 119.5 | C4—N2—H4N | 111.1 (16) |
C1—C2—H2 | 119.5 | H3N—N2—H4N | 111 (2) |
C2—C3—C4 | 120.14 (19) | C7—O1—Mn1 | 131.83 (13) |
C2—C3—N1 | 120.44 (19) | C7—O2—Mn1vii | 121.03 (13) |
C4—C3—N1 | 119.41 (18) | ||
C6—C1—C2—C3 | −1.4 (3) | C7—C1—C6—C5 | −177.8 (2) |
C7—C1—C2—C3 | 176.57 (19) | C6—C1—C7—O1 | −169.7 (2) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 0.5 (3) | C2—C1—C7—O1 | 12.4 (3) |
C1—C2—C3—N1 | −178.0 (2) | C6—C1—C7—O2 | 12.3 (3) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | 1.6 (3) | C2—C1—C7—O2 | −165.55 (19) |
N1—C3—C4—C5 | −179.9 (2) | C2—C3—N1—Mn1vi | 89.4 (2) |
C2—C3—C4—N2 | 177.9 (2) | C4—C3—N1—Mn1vi | −89.1 (2) |
N1—C3—C4—N2 | −3.5 (3) | O2—C7—O1—Mn1 | −40.5 (3) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | −2.9 (3) | C1—C7—O1—Mn1 | 141.59 (15) |
N2—C4—C5—C6 | −179.1 (2) | O1—C7—O2—Mn1vii | −60.8 (2) |
C4—C5—C6—C1 | 2.0 (3) | C1—C7—O2—Mn1vii | 117.02 (17) |
C2—C1—C6—C5 | 0.1 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z; (ii) −x, −y, −z; (iii) x, y+1, z; (iv) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (v) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (vi) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (vii) x, y−1, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1N···O1v | 0.88 (3) | 2.19 (3) | 3.022 (3) | 156 (2) |
N2—H3N···N2viii | 0.85 (3) | 2.26 (3) | 3.106 (3) | 178 (2) |
N2—H4N···O2ix | 0.88 (3) | 2.15 (3) | 3.008 (2) | 167 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (v) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (viii) −x+3/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ix) x+1/2, −y−1/2, z+1/2. |
H···H | 33.6 |
H···C | 10.2 |
H···O | 8.6 |
H···N | 2.5 |
H···Mn | 0.9 |
C···H | 16.1 |
C···C | 3.1 |
O···Mn | 5.2 |
O···H | 10.6 |
N···H | 2.5 |
N···Mn | 2.0 |
Mn···O | 62.0 |
Mn···N | 19.3 |
Mn···H | 18.8 |
All contacts are `non-reciprocal' (i.e., outward facing). |
Code/refcode | Metal coordination polyhedron | Ligand bonding mode | Topology |
(I) | MnN2O6 octahedron | µ3-N,O,O | Layered |
BEHJEE | NaO6 octahedrona | κO | Chain |
MIWSES | ZnO3N2 trigonal bipyramida | µ2-N,O | Chain |
XUPRUV | SnC3O tetrahedronb | κO | Molecular |
XUPSAC | SnC3NO trigonal bipyramid | µ2-N,O | Chain |
YENKOR | NdO9 capped square antiprisma | κO and κ2O,O' | Molecular |
Notes: (a) Some of the ligands are water molecules of crystallization; (b) a short `secondary' Sn···O contact (2.68 Å) is also present. |
Acknowledgements
The EPSRC National Crystallography Service (University of Southampton) is thanked for the intensity data collection.
Funding information
We thank the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (grant No. 1–3/PM-PDFP-II/2006/22) for financial support
References
Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brown, I. D. & Altermatt, D. (1985). Acta Cryst. B41, 244–247. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Feast, G. C., Haestier, J., Page, L. W., Robertson, J., Thompson, A. L. & Watkin, D. J. (2009). Acta Cryst. C65, o635–o638. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fernández-Palacio, F., Restrepo, J., Gálvez, S., Gómez-Sal, P. & Mosquera, M. E. G. (2014). CrystEngComm, 16, 3376–3386. Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Janicki, R., Mondry, A. & Starynowicz, P. (2017). Coord. Chem. Rev. 340, 98–133. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Khosa, M. K., Wood, P. T., Humphreys, S. M. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2015). J. Struct. Chem. 56, 1130–1135. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mukombiwa, E. T. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 527–533. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nonius (1998). COLLECT data collection software. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Pinto, C. B., Dos Santos, L. H. R. & Rodrigues, B. L. (2019). Acta Cryst. C75, 707–716. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Pruchnik, F. P., Bańbuła, M., Ciunik, Z., Chojnacki, H., Latocha, M., Skop, B., Wilczok, T., Opolski, A., Wietrzyk, J. & Nasulewicz, A. (2002). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 3214–3221. CrossRef Google Scholar
Robinson, K., Gibbs, G. V. & Ribbe, P. H. (1971). Science, 172, 567–570. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Rzaczyńska, Z., Bartyzel, A. & Głowiak, T. (2003). J. Coord. Chem. 56, 77–83. Google Scholar
Rzaczyńska, Z., Belskii, V. K. & Zavodnik, V. E. (1994). Pol. J. Chem. 68, 1639–1647. Google Scholar
Shape Software (2007). ATOMS. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tan, S. L., Jotani, M. M. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2019). Acta Cryst. E75, 308–318. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer17. University of Western Australia. https://hirshfeldsurface.net Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.