research communications
Rerefinement of the 5
of BiFaPhilipps-Universität Marburg, Fachbereich Chemie, Hans-Meerwein-Str. 4, 35032 Marburg, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: f.kraus@uni-marburg.de
The 5, was rerefined from single-crystal data. BiF5 crystallizes in the α-UF5 structure type in the form of colorless needles. In comparison with the previously reported crystal-structure model [Hebecker (1971). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 384, 111–114], the lattice parameters and fractional atomic coordinates were determined to much higher precision and all atoms were refined anisotropically, leading to a significantly improved structure model. The Bi atom (site symmetry 4/m..) is surrounded by six F atoms in a distorted octahedral coordination environment. The [BiF6] octahedra are corner-linked to form infinite straight chains extending parallel to [001]. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the PBE0/TZVP level of theory were performed on the of BiF5 to calculate its IR and Raman spectra. These are compared with experimental data.
of bismuth pentafluoride, BiFKeywords: crystal structure; redetermination; bismuth(V) fluoride.
CCDC reference: 2362790
1. Chemical context
Bismuth(V) fluoride was first synthesized in the year 1940 (von Wartenberg et al., 1940). Hebecker first determined its in 1971 (Hebecker, 1971). During our studies of the chemistry of BiF5, we rerefined its on basis of single-crystal data and recorded its IR and Raman spectra.
2. Structural commentary
Bismuth(V) fluoride crystallizes in the tetragonal I4/m, tI12 and Wyckoff sequence 87.hba. BiF5 adopts the α-UF5 structure type and exhibits Bi—F bond lengths of 1.941 (4) (4×) and 2.1130 (5) Å (2×). The structure consists of chains of trans-corner-sharing [BiF6] octahedra (point group symmetry 4/m..; Fig. 1) running parallel to the c axis. The chains can be described by the Niggli formula 1∞[BiF4/1F2/2]. The F1 atom bridges adjacent Bi atoms in the straight chain. As expected, the axial Bi—F1 bond lengths are longer than the four equatorial Bi—F2 bond lengths to the terminal ligands. Sections of the showing the chains are shown in Fig. 2.
van der Waals contacts exist between neighbouring chains with interatomic distances of 2.944 (5) Å (F2⋯F2v) and 2.952 (5) Å (F1⋯F2v) [symmetry code: (v) − x, − y, + z). Compared with the distances reported previously (Hebecker, 1971), these are 0.12 Å shorter for d(F2⋯F2) and 0.05 Å longer for d(F1⋯F2).
Regarding the crystal packing, a Bi atom is surrounded by 14 other Bi atoms in the shape of a distorted rhombic dodecahedron, which would correspond to the arrangement of the atoms in the W structure type. However, the rhombic dodecahedron is compressed due to the shorter intrachain and the longer interchain Bi⋯Bi distances. The F1 atoms reside in the octahedral voids of the (idealized) body-centered cubic packing, while the F2 atoms are strongly displaced from these as the octahedra are rotated around the c axis (Fig. 2).
3. Vibrational spectra
IR and Raman spectra were recorded on a polycrystalline sample of BiF5 at 293 K. Quantum-chemical calculations at the DFT-PBE0/TZVP level of theory (Dovesi et al., 2018; Zicovich-Wilson et al., 2004; Pascale et al., 2004; Maschio et al., 2013) were performed on basis of the of BiF5 to obtain the theoretical IR and Raman spectra. The recorded and calculated spectra are in good agreement, as shown in Figs. 3 and 4. A comparison of the observed and calculated bands is given in Table 1.
|
4. Synthesis and crystallization
Bismuth(III) fluoride (1.05 g, 3.95 mmol) was loaded in a corundum boat and placed inside a tube furnace. By passing diluted fluorine (F2/Ar, 10:90 v/v, Solvay) over the submitted material, bismuth(V) fluoride was synthesized at 723 K, using a heating rate of 4 K min−1 from room temperature to 723 K and a holding time of 10 h while diluted fluorine was passed with a flow rate of 5 standard cubic centimeters per minute. After cooling down to room temperature, colorless needles of bismuth(V) fluoride (601 mg, 1.98 mmol, 57%) were isolated.
5. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure .
details are summarized in Table 2Supporting information
CCDC reference: 2362790
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989024005759/wm5722sup1.cif
contains datablock I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989024005759/wm5722Isup2.hkl
BiF5 | Dx = 5.753 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 303.98 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Tetragonal, I4/m | Cell parameters from 5333 reflections |
a = 6.4439 (9) Å | θ = 8.8–60.0° |
c = 4.2260 (9) Å | µ = 49.84 mm−1 |
V = 175.48 (6) Å3 | T = 100 K |
Z = 2 | Needle, colorless |
F(000) = 256 | 0.31 × 0.13 × 0.11 mm |
Stoe IPDS 2T diffractometer | 174 independent reflections |
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, 12 x 0.4 mm long-fine focus | 174 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1 | Rint = 0.027 |
rotation method, ω scans | θmax = 31.8°, θmin = 4.5° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (LANA; Koziskova et al., 2016) | h = −9→9 |
Tmin = 0.006, Tmax = 0.078 | k = −9→9 |
1134 measured reflections | l = −5→6 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: dual |
Least-squares matrix: full | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0237P)2 + 2.0256P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.016 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
wR(F2) = 0.042 | Δρmax = 0.90 e Å−3 |
S = 1.12 | Δρmin = −1.38 e Å−3 |
174 reflections | Extinction correction: SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
12 parameters | Extinction coefficient: 0.0080 (17) |
0 restraints |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Bi | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.0199 (2) | |
F1 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.500000 | 0.0255 (15) | |
F2 | 0.2859 (7) | 0.0950 (7) | 0.000000 | 0.0275 (8) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Bi | 0.0225 (2) | 0.0225 (2) | 0.0147 (2) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
F1 | 0.029 (2) | 0.029 (2) | 0.018 (3) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
F2 | 0.0232 (17) | 0.0320 (19) | 0.0274 (19) | −0.0031 (14) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Bi—F2i | 1.941 (4) | Bi—F2 | 1.941 (4) |
Bi—F2ii | 1.941 (4) | Bi—F1 | 2.1130 (5) |
Bi—F2iii | 1.941 (4) | Bi—F1iv | 2.1130 (5) |
F2i—Bi—F2ii | 90.0 | F2iii—Bi—F1 | 90.0 |
F2i—Bi—F2iii | 90.0 | F2—Bi—F1 | 90.0 |
F2ii—Bi—F2iii | 180.0 (3) | F2i—Bi—F1iv | 90.0 |
F2i—Bi—F2 | 180.0 | F2ii—Bi—F1iv | 90.0 |
F2ii—Bi—F2 | 90.0 | F2iii—Bi—F1iv | 90.0 |
F2iii—Bi—F2 | 90.0 | F2—Bi—F1iv | 90.0 |
F2i—Bi—F1 | 90.0 | F1—Bi—F1iv | 180.0 |
F2ii—Bi—F1 | 90.0 | Biv—F1—Bi | 180.0 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z; (ii) y, −x, −z; (iii) −y, x, z; (iv) x, y, z−1; (v) x, y, z+1. |
ν = stretching vibration, δ = bending vibration, s = symmetric, as = asymmetric, – = not observed. |
IR | Raman | Assignment | ||
νcalc | vobs | νcalc | vobs | |
630 | 618 | – | – | vas(Bi—F2) + δ(Bi—F1—Bi) |
– | – | 607 | 596, 593 | vs(Bi—F2) |
– | – | 578 | 571, 567 | vas(Bi—F2) |
453 | 441 | – | – | vas(Bi—Fµ) |
– | – | 256 | 254 | δ(F2—Bi—F2) |
202 | – | – | – | δ(F—Bi—F) |
168 | – | – | – | δ(F—Bi—F) |
– | – | 177 | 164 | δ(F2—Bi—F1) |
125 | – | – | – | δ(F2—Bi—F1) + vas(Bi—F1) |
x | y | z | Uiso | |
Bi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0199 (2) |
F1 | 0 | 0 | 1/2 | 0.0255 (15) |
F2 | 0.2859 (7) | 0.0950 (7) | 0 | 0.0275 (8) |
Acknowledgements
We thank the X-ray facilities of Dr Sergei I. Ivlev for their great service. We thank Solvay for the kind donation of fluorine. We thank Dr Tambornino for drawing our attention to BiF5.
References
Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2022). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Dovesi, R., Erba, A., Orlando, R., Zicovich–Wilson, C. M., Civalleri, B., Maschio, L., Rérat, M., Casassa, S., Baima, J., Salustro, S. & Kirtman, B. (2018). WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1360. Google Scholar
Hebecker, C. (1971). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 384, 111–114. CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Hübschle, C. B., Sheldrick, G. M. & Dittrich, B. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1281–1284. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Koziskova, J., Hahn, F., Richter, J. & Kozisek, J. (2016). Acta Chim. Slov. 9, 136–140. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Maschio, L., Kirtman, B., Rérat, M., Orlando, R. & Dovesi, R. (2013). J. Chem. Phys. 139, 164102. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Pascale, F., Zicovich–Wilson, C. M., López Gejo, F., Civalleri, B., Orlando, R. & Dovesi, R. (2004). J. Comput. Chem. 25, 888–897. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe (2020). X-AREA. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Wartenberg, H. von (1940). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 244, 337–347. Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zicovich–Wilson, C. M., Pascale, F., Roetti, C., Saunders, V. R., Orlando, R. & Dovesi, R. (2004). J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1873–1881. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.