research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Syntheses and structures of 1-[2,2-di­chloro-1-hy­dr­oxy-3-(4-methyl­phen­yl)-3-oxoprop­yl]urea and 1-[2,2-di­chloro-3-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-1-hy­dr­oxy-3-oxoprop­yl]urea

crossmark logo

aKosygin State University of Russia, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation, bN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation, cHacettepe University, Department of Physics, 06800 Beytepe-Ankara, Türkiye, and dDepartment of Chemistry, Bahir Dar University, PO Box 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 10 March 2025; accepted 14 May 2025; online 20 May 2025)

The title compounds, C10H9Cl2FN2O3, (I), and C11H12Cl2N2O3, (II), are α,α-dihalo-β-diketone urea derivatives, which contain 4-fluoro­phenyl and p-tolyl groups, respectively. The conformation about the CO—CCl2—CO—Nu (O = keto, Cl2 = di­chloro, u = urea) bond is anti in (I) and gauche in (II). In the crystals of both compounds, O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds generate inversion dimers and the dimers are linked into (100) layers by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The Hirshfeld surface analyses of the crystal structures indicate that the most important contributions for the crystal packings are from H⋯O/O⋯H (22.3%), H⋯H (20.9%), H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H (15.6%) and H⋯C/C⋯H (10.3%) for (I) and H⋯H (31.7%), H⋯O/O⋯H (25.1%), H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H (21.1%) and H⋯C/C⋯H (9.5%) for (II).

1. Chemical context

The replacement of hydrogen atoms with halogen atoms at the active methyl­ene group in β-diketones prevents keto–enol tautomerism and impacts on the reactivity of the corresponding α,α-dihalo-β- diketones (e.g., Guseinov et al., 2006[Guseinov, F. N., Burangulova, R. N., Mukhamedzyanova, E. F., Strunin, B. P., Sinyashin, O. G., Litvinov, I. A. & Gubaidullin, A. T. (2006). Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 42, 943-947.]). For instance, the reaction of α,α-dihalo-β-oxo­aldehydes and their derivatives with N-nucleophilic reagents lead to hetero- or macrocyclic compounds (Guseinov et al., 2024[Guseinov, F. I., Ovsyannikov, V. O., Shuvalova, E. V., Kustov, L. M., Kobrakov, K. I., Samigullina, A. I. & Mahmudov, K. T. (2024). New J. Chem. 48, 12869-12872.]). This class of compounds can be used in the spectrophotometric determination of metal ions (Aliyev et al., 2020[Aliyev, E. H., Bahmanova, F. N., Hamidov, S. Z. & Chyragov, F. M. (2020). Izvest. Vuzov-Prikladnaya Khim. Biotek. 10, 107-113.]), decoration of the secondary coordination sphere of metal complexes for catalysis (Aliyeva et al., 2024[Aliyeva, V. A., Gurbanov, A. V., Huseynov, F. E., Hajiyeva, S. R., Conceiçao, N. R., Nunes, A. V. M., Pombeiro, A. J. L. & Mahmudov, K. T. (2024). Polyhedron, 255, 116955.]), crystal growth and design (Naghiyev et al., 2023[Naghiyev, F. N., Khrustalev, V. N., Akkurt, M., Khalilov, A. N., Bhattarai, A., Kerimli, F. S. & Mamedov, İ. G. (2023). Acta Cryst. E79, 494-498.]) and heterogenous catalysis (Mahmudov et al., 2022[Mahmudov, K. T., Kerimli, F. Sh., Mammadov, E. S., Gurbanov, A. V., Akhmedova, N. F. & Mammadov, S. E. (2022). Pet. Chem. 62, 933-941.]). In fact, the use of N-compounds has many synthetic advantages (Khalilov, 2021[Khalilov, A. N. (2021). Rev. Roum. Chim. 66, 719.]), such as easy modification and functionalization (Huseynov et al., 2021[Huseynov, F. E., Mahmoudi, G., Hajiyeva, S. R., Shamilov, N. T., Zubkov, F. I., Nikitina, E. V., Prisyazhnyuk, E. D. & Kopylovich, M. N. (2021). Polyhedron, 209, 115453.]), immobilization on solid materials through supra­molecular inter­actions (Mamedov et al., 2006[Mamedov, S. E., Akhmedov, E. I., Kerimli, F. S. & Makhmudova, M. I. (2006). Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 79, 1723-1725.]), and crystal engineering (Hajiyeva et al., 2024[Hajiyeva, S. R., Huseynov, F. E., Atioğlu, Z., Akkurt, M. & Bhattarai, A. (2024). Acta Cryst. E80, 110-116.]).

[Scheme 1]

Herein, we describe the syntheses and crystal structures of the two title compounds, C10H9Cl2FN2O3 (I) and C11H12Cl2N2O3 (II), which differ in the substituent at the para position of the phenyl group.

2. Structural commentary

In (I) (Fig. 1[link]), the dihedral angle between the C7–C12 phenyl group and the C2/N1/N3/O2 urea moiety is 65.19 (8)°. The key torsion angles for the backbone of the mol­ecule are C7—C6—C5—C4 = −179.65 (13), C6—C5—C4—N3 = −171.20 (12), C4—C5—C6—O6 = 2.95 (19) and C6—C5—C4—O4 = 66.65 (15)°. Atom C4 is a stereogenic centre: in the arbitrarily chosen asymmetric unit it has R configuration, but crystal symmetry generates a racemic mixture. Atoms F1, C6, C5 are displaced by −0.0244 (11), −0.0602 (15) and −0.0879 (15) Å, respectively, from the plane of the phenyl group. The N1—C2—O2, N3—C4—O4, N3—C4—C5, Cl1—C5—Cl2 and C4—C5—C6 bond angles in (I) are enlarged, while the O2—C2—N3 bond angle in (I) is narrowed compared to the corresponding values in (II): these small differences might arise due to steric reasons or 'packing effects'.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The asymmetric units of compounds (a) (I) and (b) (II) with 50% probability ellipsoids.

In (II) (Fig. 1[link]), the corresponding dihedral angle between the C7–C12 and C2/N1/N3/O2 planes is 62.70 (9)° and the equivalent backbone torsion angles are C7—C6—C5—C4 = 162.65 (14), C6—C5—C4—N3 = −62.41 (16), C4—C5—C6—O6 = −17.42 (19) and C6—C5—C4—O4 = 176.34 (12)°. Thus it may be seen that the conformation of the atoms about the C4—C5 bond is quite different in the two structures. The stereogenic atom C4 in (II) was arbitrarily assigned to have an R configuration, but crystal symmetry generates a racemic mixture.

3. Supra­molecular features

In the crystals of both compounds, O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Tables 1[link] and 2[link]) generate inversion dimers featuring R22(12) loops. In both structures, N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the dimers into (100) layers, although they are not isostuctural. The hydrogen-bond network encloses R33(14) loops in (I) (Fig. 2[link]a) and R22(8) and R33(8) loops in (II) (Fig. 2[link]b).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (I)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O4i 0.90 (3) 2.06 (3) 2.9488 (19) 172 (2)
N1—H1B⋯O2ii 0.86 (2) 2.48 (2) 3.297 (2) 158 (2)
N3—H3⋯O6iii 0.87 (2) 2.06 (2) 2.9055 (18) 167 (2)
O4—H4⋯O2iv 0.78 (3) 1.91 (3) 2.6596 (16) 161 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation.

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (II)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O4i 0.82 (3) 2.27 (3) 3.0261 (19) 153 (2)
N1—H1B⋯O4ii 0.84 (3) 2.14 (3) 2.9798 (18) 177 (2)
N3—H3⋯O2iii 0.81 (3) 2.19 (3) 2.9445 (18) 156 (2)
O4—H4⋯O2iv 0.78 (3) 1.83 (3) 2.5979 (16) 168 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The partial packing diagrams of compounds (a) (I) and (b) (II). Inter­molecular O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. H atoms not involved in these inter­actions have been omitted for clarity.

4. Hirshfeld surface analysis

For visualizing the inter­molecular inter­actions in the crystals of (I) and (II), Hirshfeld surface (HS) analyses were carried out using Crystal Explorer 17.5 (Spackman et al., 2021[Spackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006-1011.]). In the HSs plotted over dnorm (Fig. 3[link]a and b), the contact distances equal, shorter and longer with respect to the sum of van der Waals radii are shown by the white, red and blue colours, respectively. According to the two-dimensional fingerprint plots, H⋯O/O⋯H, H⋯H and H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H contacts make the most important contributions to the HSs (Table 3[link], Figs. 4[link] and 5[link]), and they have significant differences due to the different numbers and values of the close contacts in (I) and (II).

Table 3
Comparison of the fingerprint percentages for compounds (I) and (II)

Contacts (I) (II)
H⋯O/O⋯H 22.3 25.1
H⋯H 20.9 31.7
H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H 15.6 21.1
H⋯C/C⋯H 10.3 9.5
H⋯F/F⋯H 8.3
C⋯Cl/Cl⋯C 6.4 2.8
C⋯F/F⋯C 3.1
F⋯Cl/Cl⋯F 2.8
Cl⋯Cl 2.4 1.9
H⋯N/N⋯H 2.4 1.3
C⋯C 1.8 3.0
O⋯O 1.4
F⋯F 0.7
O⋯Cl/Cl⋯O 0.7 0.2
C⋯O/O⋯C 0.6 1.9
N⋯O/O⋯N 0.3 0.1
C⋯N/N⋯C 0.1
N⋯Cl/Cl⋯N 0.1 1.3
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Views of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surfaces of compounds (a) (I) and (b) (II) plotted over dnorm.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
The two-dimensional fingerprint plots for compound (I), showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into different contact types (b)–(i). The di and de values are the closest inter­nal and external distances (in Å) from given points on the Hirshfeld surface.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
The two-dimensional fingerprint plots for compound (II), showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into different contact types (b)–(i). The di and de values are the closest inter­nal and external distances (in Å) from given points on the Hirshfeld surface.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

A solution of 2,2-di­chloro-3-oxo-3-(p-tol­yl)propanal (231 mg) for (I) or 2,2-di­chloro-3-(4-fluoro­phen­yl)-3-oxopropanal (235 mg) for (II) and urea (60 mg) in 15 ml of dry aceto­nitrile was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the remaining white powder was recrystallized from acetone solution and the title compounds were isolated. The reaction scheme is shown in Fig. 6[link].

[Figure 6]
Figure 6
The synthesis of the title compounds.

(I): yield 82%; m.p. 378–380 K. Analysis calculated (%) for C11H12Cl2N2O3: C 45.38, H 4.15, N 9.62; found C 45.36, H 4.11, N 9.60. 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6): 2.41 (s, CH3), 5.94 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.01–6.08 (d.d, CH), 6.72 (d, OH), 6.85 (d. NH), 7.38 (d. 2H, Ar), 7.95 (d, 2H, Ar). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): 21.32, 88.03, 104.05, 128.74, 128.91, 133.77, 142.81, 162.72, 186.95.

(II): yield 78%; m.p. 397–398 K. Analysis calculated (%) for C10H9Cl2FN2O3: C 40.70, H 3.07, N 9.49; found C 40.65, H 3.02, N 9.45. 1H NMR (300MHz, DMSO-d6): 5.96 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.03–6.08 (d.d, CH), 6.78 (d, OH), 6.93 (d, NH), 7.46 (t, 2H, Ar), 8.12 (d.d, 2H, Ar). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): 88.10, 104.12, 115.46, 130.49, 132.37, 162.74, 167.35, 186.92.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4[link]. The OH and NH2 hydrogen atoms were located in difference-Fourier maps, and refined isotropically. The C-bond hydrogen-atom positions were placed geometrically (C—H = 0.95–1.00 Å) and refined using a riding model by applying the constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(methyl C).

Table 4
Experimental details

  (I) (II)
Crystal data
Chemical formula C10H9Cl2FN2O3 C11H12Cl2N2O3
Mr 295.09 291.13
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 100 100
a, b, c (Å) 15.6136 (1), 7.2214 (1), 10.7929 (1) 12.62183 (13), 8.77585 (9), 11.59930 (11)
β (°) 104.622 (1) 94.8294 (9)
V3) 1177.51 (2) 1280.26 (2)
Z 4 4
Radiation type Cu Kα Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 5.14 4.60
Crystal size (mm) 0.32 × 0.15 × 0.05 0.45 × 0.35 × 0.16
 
Data collection
Diffractometer XtaLAB Synergy, Dualflex, HyPix XtaLAB Synergy, Dualflex, HyPix
Absorption correction Gaussian (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2024[Rigaku OD (2024). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.]) Gaussian (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2024[Rigaku OD (2024). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.408, 1.000 0.277, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 16149, 2562, 2494 17344, 2808, 2738
Rint 0.035 0.050
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.640 0.640
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.031, 0.082, 1.06 0.037, 0.104, 1.06
No. of reflections 2562 2808
No. of parameters 179 180
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.40, −0.31 0.51, −0.43
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2024[Rigaku OD (2024). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.]), SHELXT2014/5 (Sheldrick, 2015a[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009[Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339-341.]).

Supporting information


Computing details top

1-[2,2-Dichloro-1-hydroxy-3-(4-methylphenyl)-3-oxopropyl]urea (I) top
Crystal data top
C10H9Cl2FN2O3F(000) = 600
Mr = 295.09Dx = 1.665 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
a = 15.6136 (1) ÅCell parameters from 10775 reflections
b = 7.2214 (1) Åθ = 2.9–80.5°
c = 10.7929 (1) ŵ = 5.14 mm1
β = 104.622 (1)°T = 100 K
V = 1177.51 (2) Å3Prism, colorless
Z = 40.32 × 0.15 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
XtaLAB Synergy, Dualflex, HyPix
diffractometer
2562 independent reflections
Radiation source: micro-focus sealed X-ray tube, PhotonJet (Cu) X-ray Source2494 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromatorRint = 0.035
Detector resolution: 10.0000 pixels mm-1θmax = 80.7°, θmin = 2.9°
ω scansh = 1919
Absorption correction: gaussian
(CrysAlisPro; Rigaku OD, 2024)
k = 99
Tmin = 0.408, Tmax = 1.000l = 1013
16149 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.082H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0418P)2 + 0.7639P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2562 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
179 parametersΔρmax = 0.40 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.31 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.75812 (2)0.64065 (5)0.20981 (3)0.02166 (11)
Cl20.71108 (2)0.90786 (5)0.38664 (3)0.02237 (11)
F10.45932 (7)0.18867 (16)0.44559 (10)0.0321 (2)
O20.91429 (7)1.16468 (16)0.49959 (11)0.0231 (2)
O40.93636 (8)0.66517 (16)0.38219 (11)0.0216 (2)
H40.9848 (18)0.692 (4)0.417 (2)0.038 (7)*
O60.83823 (7)0.53628 (16)0.55147 (10)0.0220 (2)
N10.91321 (10)1.2742 (2)0.30188 (16)0.0279 (3)
H1A0.9206 (17)1.389 (4)0.334 (2)0.040 (7)*
H1B0.9071 (15)1.259 (4)0.221 (2)0.032 (6)*
N30.88523 (9)0.96745 (19)0.32966 (13)0.0222 (3)
H30.8796 (15)0.958 (4)0.248 (2)0.035 (6)*
C20.90498 (10)1.1385 (2)0.38332 (16)0.0204 (3)
C40.87990 (10)0.8058 (2)0.40405 (14)0.0195 (3)
H4A0.8969750.8395280.4969150.023*
C50.78496 (10)0.7248 (2)0.37028 (13)0.0185 (3)
C60.77450 (10)0.5688 (2)0.46381 (14)0.0178 (3)
C70.68898 (10)0.4691 (2)0.45000 (14)0.0187 (3)
C80.61114 (10)0.5077 (2)0.35608 (15)0.0220 (3)
H80.6114050.6001130.2935380.026*
C90.53355 (11)0.4121 (2)0.35358 (16)0.0239 (3)
H90.4806940.4371660.2896500.029*
C100.53522 (11)0.2797 (2)0.44634 (16)0.0238 (3)
C110.61052 (11)0.2368 (2)0.54016 (16)0.0261 (3)
H110.6094620.1442870.6023200.031*
C120.68768 (11)0.3321 (2)0.54142 (15)0.0228 (3)
H120.7403430.3043060.6050080.027*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.02614 (19)0.0226 (2)0.01572 (18)0.00771 (14)0.00426 (13)0.00293 (12)
Cl20.02389 (19)0.01773 (19)0.0245 (2)0.00268 (13)0.00429 (14)0.00032 (13)
F10.0255 (5)0.0325 (6)0.0395 (6)0.0097 (4)0.0100 (4)0.0007 (5)
O20.0221 (5)0.0199 (6)0.0272 (6)0.0036 (4)0.0059 (4)0.0061 (4)
O40.0204 (5)0.0172 (5)0.0271 (6)0.0031 (4)0.0057 (4)0.0057 (4)
O60.0226 (5)0.0229 (6)0.0188 (5)0.0006 (4)0.0023 (4)0.0011 (4)
N10.0359 (8)0.0167 (7)0.0321 (8)0.0040 (6)0.0103 (6)0.0020 (6)
N30.0285 (7)0.0174 (7)0.0200 (6)0.0056 (5)0.0046 (5)0.0023 (5)
C20.0147 (6)0.0177 (7)0.0281 (8)0.0015 (5)0.0041 (6)0.0038 (6)
C40.0219 (7)0.0151 (7)0.0210 (7)0.0024 (6)0.0043 (5)0.0024 (6)
C50.0214 (7)0.0158 (7)0.0171 (6)0.0011 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0017 (5)
C60.0215 (7)0.0160 (7)0.0164 (7)0.0001 (5)0.0057 (5)0.0024 (5)
C70.0218 (7)0.0165 (7)0.0186 (7)0.0008 (6)0.0063 (5)0.0019 (5)
C80.0239 (7)0.0211 (7)0.0204 (7)0.0011 (6)0.0045 (6)0.0014 (6)
C90.0219 (7)0.0254 (8)0.0237 (7)0.0007 (6)0.0042 (6)0.0014 (6)
C100.0236 (7)0.0207 (8)0.0285 (8)0.0058 (6)0.0093 (6)0.0045 (6)
C110.0297 (8)0.0227 (8)0.0269 (8)0.0032 (7)0.0088 (6)0.0052 (6)
C120.0233 (7)0.0210 (8)0.0231 (7)0.0001 (6)0.0040 (6)0.0028 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl1—C51.7826 (14)C4—C51.549 (2)
Cl2—C51.7923 (16)C5—C61.549 (2)
F1—C101.3534 (18)C6—C71.491 (2)
O2—C21.241 (2)C7—C81.400 (2)
O4—H40.78 (3)C7—C121.401 (2)
O4—C41.4032 (19)C8—H80.9500
O6—C61.2103 (19)C8—C91.389 (2)
N1—H1A0.90 (3)C9—H90.9500
N1—H1B0.86 (2)C9—C101.380 (2)
N1—C21.344 (2)C10—C111.379 (2)
N3—H30.87 (2)C11—H110.9500
N3—C21.366 (2)C11—C121.385 (2)
N3—C41.431 (2)C12—H120.9500
C4—H4A1.0000
C4—O4—H4108.1 (19)O6—C6—C5116.71 (13)
H1A—N1—H1B119 (2)O6—C6—C7121.55 (14)
C2—N1—H1A116.4 (17)C7—C6—C5121.69 (13)
C2—N1—H1B124.6 (17)C8—C7—C6124.60 (14)
C2—N3—H3117.2 (17)C8—C7—C12119.10 (14)
C2—N3—C4122.60 (14)C12—C7—C6116.26 (14)
C4—N3—H3120.1 (17)C7—C8—H8119.7
O2—C2—N1122.99 (15)C9—C8—C7120.56 (15)
O2—C2—N3121.50 (15)C9—C8—H8119.7
N1—C2—N3115.50 (15)C8—C9—H9120.9
O4—C4—N3111.59 (13)C10—C9—C8118.28 (15)
O4—C4—H4A109.0C10—C9—H9120.9
O4—C4—C5106.95 (12)F1—C10—C9118.43 (15)
N3—C4—H4A109.0F1—C10—C11118.56 (15)
N3—C4—C5111.33 (13)C11—C10—C9123.01 (15)
C5—C4—H4A109.0C10—C11—H11120.9
Cl1—C5—Cl2110.35 (8)C10—C11—C12118.29 (15)
C4—C5—Cl1109.49 (10)C12—C11—H11120.9
C4—C5—Cl2107.43 (10)C7—C12—H12119.6
C6—C5—Cl1110.36 (10)C11—C12—C7120.75 (15)
C6—C5—Cl2107.22 (10)C11—C12—H12119.6
C6—C5—C4111.93 (12)
Cl1—C5—C6—O6125.15 (13)C4—N3—C2—O24.3 (2)
Cl1—C5—C6—C757.44 (16)C4—N3—C2—N1175.81 (14)
Cl2—C5—C6—O6114.62 (13)C4—C5—C6—O62.95 (19)
Cl2—C5—C6—C762.78 (15)C4—C5—C6—C7179.65 (13)
F1—C10—C11—C12179.17 (15)C5—C6—C7—C81.6 (2)
O4—C4—C5—Cl156.04 (14)C5—C6—C7—C12179.34 (13)
O4—C4—C5—Cl2175.90 (10)C6—C7—C8—C9177.53 (15)
O4—C4—C5—C666.65 (15)C6—C7—C12—C11177.33 (15)
O6—C6—C7—C8175.69 (15)C7—C8—C9—C100.5 (2)
O6—C6—C7—C122.1 (2)C8—C7—C12—C110.5 (2)
N3—C4—C5—Cl166.10 (14)C8—C9—C10—F1178.80 (15)
N3—C4—C5—Cl253.75 (14)C8—C9—C10—C110.8 (3)
N3—C4—C5—C6171.20 (12)C9—C10—C11—C120.4 (3)
C2—N3—C4—O4124.46 (15)C10—C11—C12—C70.3 (3)
C2—N3—C4—C5116.12 (15)C12—C7—C8—C90.2 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O4i0.90 (3)2.06 (3)2.9488 (19)172 (2)
N1—H1B···O2ii0.86 (2)2.48 (2)3.297 (2)158 (2)
N3—H3···O6iii0.87 (2)2.06 (2)2.9055 (18)167 (2)
O4—H4···O2iv0.78 (3)1.91 (3)2.6596 (16)161 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) x, y+5/2, z1/2; (iii) x, y+3/2, z1/2; (iv) x+2, y+2, z+1.
1-[2,2-Dichloro-3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-hydroxy-3-oxopropyl]urea (II) top
Crystal data top
C11H12Cl2N2O3F(000) = 600
Mr = 291.13Dx = 1.510 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
a = 12.62183 (13) ÅCell parameters from 11708 reflections
b = 8.77585 (9) Åθ = 3.5–80.3°
c = 11.59930 (11) ŵ = 4.60 mm1
β = 94.8294 (9)°T = 100 K
V = 1280.26 (2) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 40.45 × 0.35 × 0.16 mm
Data collection top
XtaLAB Synergy, Dualflex, HyPix
diffractometer
2808 independent reflections
Radiation source: micro-focus sealed X-ray tube, PhotonJet (Cu) X-ray Source2738 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromatorRint = 0.050
Detector resolution: 10.0000 pixels mm-1θmax = 80.7°, θmin = 3.5°
ω scansh = 1316
Absorption correction: gaussian
(CrysAlisPro; Rigaku OD, 2024)
k = 1111
Tmin = 0.277, Tmax = 1.000l = 1414
17344 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.104H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0655P)2 + 0.6302P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2808 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
180 parametersΔρmax = 0.51 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.22629 (3)0.88241 (4)0.40687 (3)0.02066 (13)
Cl20.24819 (3)0.70279 (5)0.61915 (3)0.02309 (13)
O20.02392 (10)0.37516 (13)0.31405 (10)0.0221 (3)
O40.03286 (9)0.72384 (13)0.48926 (10)0.0192 (2)
O60.27591 (10)0.45882 (14)0.39418 (11)0.0259 (3)
N10.03826 (12)0.49974 (17)0.14562 (12)0.0212 (3)
N30.08327 (11)0.62287 (15)0.31617 (12)0.0180 (3)
C20.04683 (12)0.49344 (18)0.26185 (13)0.0181 (3)
C40.10682 (12)0.63031 (17)0.43899 (13)0.0176 (3)
H4A0.1034570.5253550.4720570.021*
C50.22071 (13)0.69474 (17)0.46569 (13)0.0185 (3)
C60.30485 (13)0.58690 (19)0.41747 (13)0.0204 (3)
C70.41441 (13)0.6404 (2)0.40165 (14)0.0225 (3)
C80.46819 (15)0.5634 (2)0.31877 (16)0.0279 (4)
H80.4334830.4844150.2741650.033*
C90.57245 (15)0.6024 (2)0.30150 (17)0.0321 (4)
H90.6075160.5518260.2430570.039*
C100.62617 (15)0.7138 (2)0.36820 (18)0.0325 (4)
C110.57243 (15)0.7900 (2)0.45141 (18)0.0326 (4)
H110.6082740.8664700.4977160.039*
C120.46717 (15)0.7555 (2)0.46742 (16)0.0275 (4)
H120.4310280.8101010.5230000.033*
C130.74130 (16)0.7514 (3)0.3535 (2)0.0440 (5)
H13A0.7627500.7024460.2831780.066*
H13B0.7861490.7139900.4206560.066*
H13C0.7495430.8620220.3471880.066*
H1A0.059 (2)0.574 (3)0.110 (2)0.030 (6)*
H1B0.0183 (19)0.420 (3)0.110 (2)0.028 (6)*
H30.0725 (18)0.701 (3)0.280 (2)0.023 (5)*
H40.014 (2)0.683 (3)0.543 (3)0.034 (6)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0239 (2)0.0173 (2)0.0211 (2)0.00221 (12)0.00407 (14)0.00018 (12)
Cl20.0263 (2)0.0291 (2)0.01385 (19)0.00153 (14)0.00155 (14)0.00215 (13)
O20.0313 (6)0.0194 (6)0.0164 (5)0.0060 (4)0.0065 (4)0.0001 (4)
O40.0229 (5)0.0207 (5)0.0150 (5)0.0016 (4)0.0073 (4)0.0021 (4)
O60.0270 (6)0.0222 (6)0.0290 (6)0.0015 (5)0.0057 (5)0.0049 (5)
N10.0304 (7)0.0189 (6)0.0144 (6)0.0061 (5)0.0037 (5)0.0009 (5)
N30.0253 (6)0.0152 (6)0.0139 (6)0.0010 (5)0.0032 (5)0.0016 (5)
C20.0199 (7)0.0179 (7)0.0168 (7)0.0003 (5)0.0043 (5)0.0001 (5)
C40.0217 (7)0.0176 (7)0.0139 (7)0.0012 (5)0.0042 (5)0.0008 (5)
C50.0225 (7)0.0182 (7)0.0150 (7)0.0007 (6)0.0035 (5)0.0005 (5)
C60.0235 (7)0.0226 (7)0.0156 (7)0.0027 (6)0.0039 (5)0.0006 (6)
C70.0215 (7)0.0258 (8)0.0203 (7)0.0026 (6)0.0030 (6)0.0021 (6)
C80.0277 (8)0.0307 (9)0.0258 (8)0.0044 (7)0.0061 (6)0.0006 (7)
C90.0279 (9)0.0390 (10)0.0308 (9)0.0081 (8)0.0105 (7)0.0065 (7)
C100.0231 (8)0.0377 (10)0.0372 (10)0.0018 (7)0.0063 (7)0.0162 (8)
C110.0269 (9)0.0346 (10)0.0358 (10)0.0041 (7)0.0000 (7)0.0040 (8)
C120.0263 (8)0.0305 (9)0.0260 (8)0.0010 (7)0.0039 (6)0.0010 (7)
C130.0258 (10)0.0529 (14)0.0546 (13)0.0018 (9)0.0104 (9)0.0210 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl1—C51.7864 (16)C6—C71.486 (2)
Cl2—C51.7861 (16)C7—C81.397 (2)
O2—C21.248 (2)C7—C121.400 (3)
O4—C41.4060 (18)C8—H80.9500
O4—H40.78 (3)C8—C91.390 (3)
O6—C61.205 (2)C9—H90.9500
N1—C21.345 (2)C9—C101.388 (3)
N1—H1A0.82 (3)C10—C111.396 (3)
N1—H1B0.84 (3)C10—C131.514 (2)
N3—C21.360 (2)C11—H110.9500
N3—C41.432 (2)C11—C121.390 (3)
N3—H30.81 (3)C12—H120.9500
C4—H4A1.0000C13—H13A0.9800
C4—C51.551 (2)C13—H13B0.9800
C5—C61.561 (2)C13—H13C0.9800
C4—O4—H4109 (2)C8—C7—C6116.30 (16)
C2—N1—H1A121.9 (18)C8—C7—C12119.18 (16)
C2—N1—H1B117.0 (16)C12—C7—C6124.44 (15)
H1A—N1—H1B121 (2)C7—C8—H8120.0
C2—N3—C4122.18 (13)C9—C8—C7120.07 (18)
C2—N3—H3115.9 (17)C9—C8—H8120.0
C4—N3—H3118.9 (17)C8—C9—H9119.4
O2—C2—N1121.23 (15)C10—C9—C8121.10 (18)
O2—C2—N3123.58 (14)C10—C9—H9119.4
N1—C2—N3115.19 (14)C9—C10—C11118.69 (17)
O4—C4—N3110.47 (13)C9—C10—C13121.3 (2)
O4—C4—H4A109.1C11—C10—C13120.0 (2)
O4—C4—C5109.93 (12)C10—C11—H11119.6
N3—C4—H4A109.1C12—C11—C10120.89 (19)
N3—C4—C5109.05 (12)C12—C11—H11119.6
C5—C4—H4A109.1C7—C12—H12120.0
Cl2—C5—Cl1109.48 (8)C11—C12—C7120.02 (17)
C4—C5—Cl1108.99 (11)C11—C12—H12120.0
C4—C5—Cl2108.20 (10)C10—C13—H13A109.5
C4—C5—C6110.76 (13)C10—C13—H13B109.5
C6—C5—Cl1111.85 (11)C10—C13—H13C109.5
C6—C5—Cl2107.47 (11)H13A—C13—H13B109.5
O6—C6—C5116.31 (14)H13A—C13—H13C109.5
O6—C6—C7122.32 (15)H13B—C13—H13C109.5
C7—C6—C5121.38 (14)
Cl1—C5—C6—O6139.23 (13)C4—N3—C2—N1173.78 (14)
Cl1—C5—C6—C740.85 (18)C4—C5—C6—O617.42 (19)
Cl2—C5—C6—O6100.57 (15)C4—C5—C6—C7162.65 (14)
Cl2—C5—C6—C779.35 (16)C5—C6—C7—C8155.04 (15)
O4—C4—C5—Cl160.19 (14)C5—C6—C7—C1228.2 (2)
O4—C4—C5—Cl258.79 (14)C6—C7—C8—C9177.58 (17)
O4—C4—C5—C6176.34 (12)C6—C7—C12—C11175.43 (17)
O6—C6—C7—C825.0 (2)C7—C8—C9—C102.2 (3)
O6—C6—C7—C12151.71 (18)C8—C7—C12—C111.2 (3)
N3—C4—C5—Cl161.06 (14)C8—C9—C10—C111.9 (3)
N3—C4—C5—Cl2179.97 (10)C8—C9—C10—C13177.11 (18)
N3—C4—C5—C662.41 (16)C9—C10—C11—C120.1 (3)
C2—N3—C4—O4110.90 (16)C10—C11—C12—C71.6 (3)
C2—N3—C4—C5128.18 (15)C12—C7—C8—C90.6 (3)
C4—N3—C2—O25.2 (2)C13—C10—C11—C12179.03 (19)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O4i0.82 (3)2.27 (3)3.0261 (19)153 (2)
N1—H1B···O4ii0.84 (3)2.14 (3)2.9798 (18)177 (2)
N3—H3···O2iii0.81 (3)2.19 (3)2.9445 (18)156 (2)
O4—H4···O2iv0.78 (3)1.83 (3)2.5979 (16)168 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+3/2, z1/2; (ii) x, y1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x, y+1, z+1.
Comparison of the fingerprint percentages for compounds (I) and (II) top
Contacts(I)(II)
H···O/O···H22.325.1
H···H20.931.7
H···Cl/Cl···H15.621.1
H···C/C···H10.39.5
H···F/F···H8.3
C···Cl/Cl···C6.42.8
C···F/F···C3.1
F···Cl/Cl···F2.8
Cl···Cl2.41.9
H···N/N···H2.41.3
C···C1.83.0
O···O1.4
F···F0.7
O···Cl/Cl···O0.70.2
C···O/O···C0.61.9
N···O/O···N0.30.1
C···N/N···C0.1
N···Cl/Cl···N0.11.3
 

Acknowledgements

The crystal structure determinations were performed in the Department of Structural Studies of Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Moscow. This work was supported by the Western Caspian University and Azerbaijan Medical University in Azerbaijan. The authors' contributions are as follows. Conceptualization, FIG, TH and ANB; synthesis, KAA, EVS and LMG; X-ray analysis, AIS; Hirshfeld surface analyses, crystal voids, inter­action energies and energy frameworks, TH; writing (review and editing of the manuscript) FIG and TH; funding acquisition, KIH; supervision, FIG, TH and ANB.

References

First citationAliyeva, V. A., Gurbanov, A. V., Huseynov, F. E., Hajiyeva, S. R., Conceiçao, N. R., Nunes, A. V. M., Pombeiro, A. J. L. & Mahmudov, K. T. (2024). Polyhedron, 255, 116955.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationAliyev, E. H., Bahmanova, F. N., Hamidov, S. Z. & Chyragov, F. M. (2020). Izvest. Vuzov-Prikladnaya Khim. Biotek. 10, 107–113.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGuseinov, F. I., Ovsyannikov, V. O., Shuvalova, E. V., Kustov, L. M., Kobrakov, K. I., Samigullina, A. I. & Mahmudov, K. T. (2024). New J. Chem. 48, 12869–12872.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationGuseinov, F. N., Burangulova, R. N., Mukhamedzyanova, E. F., Strunin, B. P., Sinyashin, O. G., Litvinov, I. A. & Gubaidullin, A. T. (2006). Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 42, 943–947.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationHajiyeva, S. R., Huseynov, F. E., Atioğlu, Z., Akkurt, M. & Bhattarai, A. (2024). Acta Cryst. E80, 110–116.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationHuseynov, F. E., Mahmoudi, G., Hajiyeva, S. R., Shamilov, N. T., Zubkov, F. I., Nikitina, E. V., Prisyazhnyuk, E. D. & Kopylovich, M. N. (2021). Polyhedron, 209, 115453.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationKhalilov, A. N. (2021). Rev. Roum. Chim. 66, 719.  Google Scholar
First citationMahmudov, K. T., Kerimli, F. Sh., Mammadov, E. S., Gurbanov, A. V., Akhmedova, N. F. & Mammadov, S. E. (2022). Pet. Chem. 62, 933–941.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMamedov, S. E., Akhmedov, E. I., Kerimli, F. S. & Makhmudova, M. I. (2006). Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 79, 1723–1725.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationNaghiyev, F. N., Khrustalev, V. N., Akkurt, M., Khalilov, A. N., Bhattarai, A., Kerimli, F. S. & Mamedov, İ. G. (2023). Acta Cryst. E79, 494–498.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationRigaku OD (2024). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSpackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds