research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Synthesis and structure of 2,4-bis­­(2,6-di­methyl-4H-pyran-4-yl­­idene)-3-oxo­penta­nedi­nitrile, an unexpected product of a Knoevenagel condensation reaction

crossmark logo

aDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università degli Studi di Napoli 'Federico II', Complesso di Monte S. Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy, and bDepartment of Applied Sciences and Technology, Polytechnic of Turin, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 19 January 2026; accepted 21 January 2026; online 23 January 2026)

The title com­pound, C19H16N2O3, was the unexpected product of the Knoevenagel condensation between 2,6-dimethyl-γ-pyrone and cyano­acetic acid in the presence of acetic anhydride and piperidine as catalyst. The mol­ecule is formed by two almost planar 2,6-dimethyl-4H-pyran-4-cyanoyl­idene halves connected by the central carbonyl group. The two halves are not coplanar, the dihedral angle between their planes being 47.51 (3)°. The packing shows the formation of (001) sheets of mol­ecules held together by weak C—H⋯N and C—H⋯O hy­dro­gen bonds. A mechanism for the reaction is proposed.

1. Chemical context

The Knoevenagel condensation is a classic organic reaction where an aldehyde or ketone reacts with a com­pound con­taining an activated methyl­ene group, i.e. a CH2 group linked to electron-withdrawing groups in the presence of a weak base as the catalyst or in a dehydrating environment (for reviews, see Jones, 1967View full citation; Heravi et al., 2020View full citation). A new carbon–carbon bond is formed, resulting in an α,β-unsaturated com­pound after dehydration. This reaction is widely used in the synthesis of n-type organic semiconductors to introduce terminal electron-acceptor groups into the mol­ecular backbone (Fusco et al., 2021View full citation; Fusco et al., 2022View full citation, Yao et al., 2023View full citation) and in the syn­thesis of organic sensitizers for Dye Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSC) (Yahya et al., 2021View full citation; D'Amico et al., 2023View full citation). In the latter case, typically, an aldehydic precursor is condensed with cyano­acetic acid to introduce a cyano­acrylic functionality essential to anchor the dye on a TiO2 mesoporous layer through the carb­oxy­lic acid group. Some of us reported on pyran-based organic sensitizers for DSSC, whose structure was based on a pyran electron-acceptor core symmetrically linked to two carbazole donor moieties and end capped with cyanoacrylic acid groups (Bonomo et al., 2020View full citation). The studied dyes differ with respect to the electron-acceptor groups fun­c­tionalizing the pyran core: by reacting commercial 2,6-di­methyl-γ-pyrone with four different mol­ecules containing activated methyl­ene groups in a Knoevenagel condensation, four different electron-acceptor groups were linked to the pyran core. Following the same synthetic strategy, we tried to react the commercial pyran­one derivative with cyano­acetic acid to introduce a cyano­acrylic acid functionality directly on the pyran core. To our surprise, the main obtained product was not that expected, but 2,4-bis­(2,6-dimethyl-4H-pyran-4-yl­idene)-3-oxo­penta­nedi­nitrile, CC (Scheme 1[link]), resulting from a more com­plex reaction involving two mol­ecules of 2,6-dimethyl-γ-pyrone and two of cyano­acetic acid. In this article, we report a full mechanistic and structural analysis of this new com­pound.

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of CC, which crystallizes in the triclinic space group PMathematical equation with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit, is shown in Fig. 1[link]. The mol­ecule is formed from two 2,6-dimethyl-4H-pyran-4-cyanoyl­idene (C9H8N2O2) halves con­nected to the central C10=O2 carbonyl group. The two halves (H atoms excluded) are close to being planar [within 0.070 (2) Å] and the pattern of bond lengths clearly evidences π-conjugation, for example, C11—C10 = 1.486 (2) Å, C11—C13 = 1.385 (2) Å and C11—C12 = 1.426 (2) Å. However, the two halves are not coplanar, their least-squares planes making a dihedral angle of 47.51 (3)°. This dihedral angle is basically the result of twists around the C8—C10 and C10—C11 bonds [C3—C8—C10—O2 = −23.9 (3)° and O2—C10—C11—C13 = −26.7 (3)°]. These twists seem mainly due to the need to relax the close contact between the C atoms of the two cyano groups [C9⋯C12 = 2.830 (2) Å]. Two short intra­molecular C—H⋯O contacts (Table 1[link]) to the central ketone O atom occur.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C4—H4⋯O2 0.93 2.26 2.876 (2) 123
C17—H17⋯O2 0.93 2.33 2.908 (2) 120
C6—H6A⋯N1i 0.96 2.62 3.557 (3) 166
C18—H18A⋯N2ii 0.96 2.48 3.425 (3) 169
C19—H19A⋯O2iii 0.96 2.55 3.446 (3) 155
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of CC, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.

3. Supra­molecular features

Each mol­ecule of CC is involved in the formation of two chains, through weak C—H⋯N hy­dro­gen bonds (Table 1[link] and Fig. 2[link]). One chain is parallel to the [Mathematical equation10] direction (C6—H6A⋯N1) and the other is parallel to [010] (C18—H18A⋯N2). In this way, an (001) bidimensional network of weakly hy­dro­gen-bonded mol­ecules is formed. The crystal packing is further consolidated by a weak C—H⋯O hy­dro­gen bond involving the carbonyl O atom as the acceptor (C19—H19A⋯O2).

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The crystal packing of CC, viewed down c.

4. Hirshfeld surface analysis

Hirshfeld surfaces were generated using the standard pro­molecule electron density based on spherical atomic electron densities, following the original definition of Hirshfeld partitioning of the crystal electron density (Spackman et al., 2021View full citation). The dnorm surfaces were mapped over the range typically used for organic mol­ecular crystals (−0.5 to +1.5 Å). Distances di (inter­nal, from the surface to the nearest atom inside the surface) and de (external, to the nearest atom outside the surface) were com­puted for each surface point, and used to generate the corresponding two-dimensional fingerprint plots (de versus di), shown in Fig. 3[link], that summarize all inter­molecular contacts around the reference mol­ecule.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Fingerprint plots for the inter­molecular H⋯N, H⋯O, H⋯H, C⋯C, H⋯C and C⋯O contacts in the crystal structure of CC. All other inter­actions contribute less than 1%.

A distinctive feature is represented by the two spikes at di + de = 2.5 Å, pointing to the lower left of the plots and sym­metrically disposed with respect to the diagonal. They correspond to the C—H⋯N≡C weak hy­dro­gen-bonding inter­­actions. The two more inter­nal symmetrical spikes at di + de = 2.54 Å correspond instead to weak C—H⋯O=C hy­dro­gen bonding. The most abundant contacts are H⋯H, as expected. The green area centred at about (di, de) = (1.8, 1.8), corresponds to ππ stacking contacts.

5. Database survey

We searched the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 2025.6.0; Groom et al., 2016View full citation) for structures similar to the title com­pound. In particular, we searched for structures containing the fragment com­posed of a central carbonyl group bonded to two C—CN groups. In the search, we applied the filters `no ions' and `only organics'. Three hits were found [CSD refcodes AXOQOU and AXOQUA (Shiraki et al., 2011View full citation), and CIFFAY (Medici et al., 1984View full citation)], but none is really analogous to the title com­pound. In fact, in the three hits, the C atoms adjacent to the carbonyl group and bearing the cyano groups are sp3-hybridized. By releasing the filters, three additional hits were found [CSD refcodes PTCYPO (Klewe, 1971View full citation), VELPAE (de Oliveira et al., 2006View full citation) and VODLIK (Atmani et al., 2008View full citation)]. In PTCYPO and VELPAE, which are ionic, one C atom adjacent to the carbonyl group is sp3-hybridized and bears one CN group, while the other bears two CN groups and is anionic. In VODLIK, each C atom adjacent to the carbonyl bears two cyano groups and is anionic, with the CN groups coordinated to CuII ions in a coordination polymer.

6. Synthesis and crystallization

6.1. Synthesis

2,6-Dimethyl-γ-pyrone (11.0 g, 88.6 mmol) and cyano­acetic acid (9.0 g, 106 mmol) were dissolved in 30 ml of acetic anhydride, and a few drops of piperidine were added. The solution was refluxed, under nitro­gen flux, overnight. A brown solid formed during the reaction that, after the system was cooled to room tem­per­a­ture, was recovered by filtration. The recovered solid was washed in 100 ml of methanol and filtered again. Pure com­pound CC was obtained (yield 35%). Re­crystallization from hot di­methyl­formamide (DMF) solution afforded orange plates suitable for single-crystal X-ray analysis. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm) 7.63 (s, 1H), 6.67 (s, 1H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.29 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm) 184.0, 162.8, 162.1, 153.8, 119.0, 90.1, 19.9.

6.2. Mechanism of reaction

The central bis-cyano­acetone portion of CC can be traced back to two cyano­acetic acid mol­ecules with the –COOH group of one cyano­acetic acid becoming the carbonyl group of CC, and the other one is lost, possibly as CO2, during the process.

Based on this, a plausible mechanistic hypothesis is shown in Fig. 4[link]. In particular, attack of the enolate derived from cy­ano­acetic acid on the carbonyl group of 2,6-dimethyl-γ-py­rone (1), followed by loss of water gives cyano­acid 2, which was the expected product. Attack of the enolate formed from a second cyano­acetic acid on the carbonyl group of the carb­oxy­lic acid function of 2, and water loss, then follows giving β-ketoacid 3. It is well known that β-ketoacids are prone to deca­rboxylation. Thus, deca­rboxylation of 3 gives β-keto­nitrile 4, the enolate form of which attacks the carbonyl group of a second mol­ecule of 1, eventually giving the final product CC, after water elimination. It is likely that the process is driven to com­pletion by the extended conjugation of the final product CC and by its precipitation from the reaction medium.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Possible reaction mechanism leading to CC.

7. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined using the riding model, with C—H distances of 0.93 Å for Csp2 and 0.96 Å for Csp3 atoms. The constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(methyl C) was applied in all cases.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C19H16N2O3
Mr 320.34
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, PMathematical equation
Temperature (K) 294
a, b, c (Å) 7.7530 (7), 8.0810 (14), 14.869 (2)
α, β, γ (°) 74.275 (13), 75.185 (12), 64.741 (13)
V3) 800.4 (2)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.09
Crystal size (mm) 0.40 × 0.40 × 0.10
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker–Nonius KappaCCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.950, 0.980
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 8620, 3584, 2683
Rint 0.037
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.650
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.051, 0.140, 1.04
No. of reflections 3584
No. of parameters 221
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.21, −0.23
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999View full citation), DIRAX/LSQ (Duisenberg et al., 2000View full citation), EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003View full citation), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999View full citation), SHELXL2019 (Sheldrick, 2015View full citation), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012View full citation) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

2,4-Bis(2,6-dimethyl-4H-pyran-4-ylidene)-3-oxopentanedinitrile top
Crystal data top
C19H16N2O3Z = 2
Mr = 320.34F(000) = 336
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.329 Mg m3
a = 7.7530 (7) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 8.0810 (14) ÅCell parameters from 140 reflections
c = 14.869 (2) Åθ = 3.1–23.8°
α = 74.275 (13)°µ = 0.09 mm1
β = 75.185 (12)°T = 294 K
γ = 64.741 (13)°Plate, orange
V = 800.4 (2) Å30.40 × 0.40 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker–Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
3584 independent reflections
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube2683 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.037
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
CCD rotation images, thick slices scansh = 109
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
k = 1010
Tmin = 0.950, Tmax = 0.980l = 1919
8620 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.140H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0634P)2 + 0.2356P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3584 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
221 parametersΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2922 (3)0.4830 (3)0.37307 (11)0.0388 (4)
C20.3497 (2)0.3930 (2)0.45670 (11)0.0367 (4)
H20.4505610.2767220.4604590.044*
C30.2594 (2)0.4718 (2)0.54069 (10)0.0318 (4)
C40.1080 (2)0.6506 (2)0.52650 (11)0.0344 (4)
H40.0418670.7097070.5779500.041*
C50.0581 (2)0.7362 (2)0.44048 (11)0.0352 (4)
C60.0906 (3)0.9234 (3)0.41601 (14)0.0490 (5)
H6A0.1593100.9719780.4727730.073*
H6B0.1794470.9154540.3842450.073*
H6C0.0298851.0044110.3751010.073*
C70.3683 (3)0.4138 (3)0.28208 (13)0.0591 (6)
H7A0.4727390.2945510.2909380.089*
H7B0.4141380.5002100.2351510.089*
H7C0.2671330.4020040.2614210.089*
C80.3153 (2)0.3736 (2)0.62836 (11)0.0336 (4)
C90.4731 (3)0.1983 (3)0.63024 (11)0.0400 (4)
C100.2283 (3)0.4439 (2)0.71759 (11)0.0368 (4)
C110.2435 (2)0.3048 (2)0.80721 (11)0.0337 (4)
C120.2411 (3)0.1301 (3)0.80563 (11)0.0394 (4)
C130.2435 (2)0.3373 (2)0.89399 (11)0.0311 (3)
C140.2535 (2)0.1961 (2)0.97809 (11)0.0350 (4)
H140.2627790.0802000.9730950.042*
C150.2500 (2)0.2248 (2)1.06311 (11)0.0346 (4)
C160.2392 (2)0.5267 (2)0.99654 (11)0.0336 (4)
C170.2370 (2)0.5076 (2)0.90996 (11)0.0330 (4)
H170.2311910.6063180.8594280.040*
C180.2362 (3)0.6932 (3)1.02192 (13)0.0455 (4)
H18A0.2242860.7907730.9671570.068*
H18B0.3540030.6621261.0442520.068*
H18C0.1283360.7345581.0708080.068*
C190.2482 (3)0.0926 (3)1.15466 (12)0.0511 (5)
H19A0.1270480.1416211.1949790.077*
H19B0.3516770.0760231.1847740.077*
H19C0.2646710.0250911.1433540.077*
N10.6038 (3)0.0598 (3)0.62864 (12)0.0595 (5)
N20.2324 (3)0.0090 (2)0.80821 (11)0.0579 (5)
O10.14832 (18)0.65436 (17)0.36313 (8)0.0407 (3)
O20.1467 (2)0.61046 (18)0.71935 (9)0.0600 (4)
O30.24437 (17)0.38884 (16)1.07394 (8)0.0379 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0468 (10)0.0461 (10)0.0275 (8)0.0229 (8)0.0015 (7)0.0089 (7)
C20.0410 (9)0.0405 (9)0.0280 (8)0.0168 (7)0.0013 (7)0.0076 (7)
C30.0400 (9)0.0373 (9)0.0255 (8)0.0233 (7)0.0028 (6)0.0056 (6)
C40.0483 (9)0.0356 (9)0.0256 (8)0.0218 (8)0.0038 (6)0.0078 (6)
C50.0477 (9)0.0360 (9)0.0289 (8)0.0218 (7)0.0062 (7)0.0070 (7)
C60.0687 (13)0.0397 (11)0.0392 (10)0.0174 (9)0.0189 (9)0.0045 (8)
C70.0714 (14)0.0700 (14)0.0280 (9)0.0185 (11)0.0017 (9)0.0171 (9)
C80.0413 (9)0.0355 (9)0.0262 (8)0.0174 (7)0.0048 (6)0.0052 (6)
C90.0452 (10)0.0479 (11)0.0250 (8)0.0186 (9)0.0028 (7)0.0050 (7)
C100.0489 (10)0.0365 (10)0.0268 (8)0.0158 (8)0.0094 (7)0.0066 (7)
C110.0411 (9)0.0338 (9)0.0250 (8)0.0124 (7)0.0047 (6)0.0073 (6)
C120.0548 (10)0.0419 (10)0.0214 (8)0.0196 (8)0.0036 (7)0.0063 (7)
C130.0303 (8)0.0332 (8)0.0253 (7)0.0077 (6)0.0036 (6)0.0065 (6)
C140.0417 (9)0.0319 (9)0.0281 (8)0.0100 (7)0.0053 (6)0.0077 (7)
C150.0362 (8)0.0335 (9)0.0294 (8)0.0081 (7)0.0066 (6)0.0059 (7)
C160.0334 (8)0.0368 (9)0.0295 (8)0.0117 (7)0.0045 (6)0.0079 (7)
C170.0357 (8)0.0347 (9)0.0258 (8)0.0118 (7)0.0039 (6)0.0051 (6)
C180.0573 (11)0.0469 (11)0.0400 (10)0.0242 (9)0.0079 (8)0.0128 (8)
C190.0711 (13)0.0456 (11)0.0282 (9)0.0160 (10)0.0118 (8)0.0007 (8)
N10.0545 (10)0.0586 (11)0.0410 (9)0.0029 (9)0.0031 (7)0.0072 (8)
N20.0952 (14)0.0525 (11)0.0367 (9)0.0405 (10)0.0071 (8)0.0083 (7)
O10.0550 (7)0.0432 (7)0.0253 (6)0.0199 (6)0.0073 (5)0.0063 (5)
O20.1017 (12)0.0355 (8)0.0332 (7)0.0097 (7)0.0227 (7)0.0082 (5)
O30.0483 (7)0.0410 (7)0.0248 (6)0.0157 (5)0.0086 (5)0.0068 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.338 (2)C10—C111.486 (2)
C1—O11.356 (2)C11—C131.385 (2)
C1—C71.487 (2)C11—C121.426 (2)
C2—C31.435 (2)C12—N21.144 (2)
C2—H20.9300C13—C171.437 (2)
C3—C81.397 (2)C13—C141.440 (2)
C3—C41.423 (2)C14—C151.337 (2)
C4—C51.345 (2)C14—H140.9300
C4—H40.9300C15—O31.360 (2)
C5—O11.3620 (19)C15—C191.486 (2)
C5—C61.476 (3)C16—C171.343 (2)
C6—H6A0.9600C16—O31.363 (2)
C6—H6B0.9600C16—C181.482 (2)
C6—H6C0.9600C17—H170.9300
C7—H7A0.9600C18—H18A0.9600
C7—H7B0.9600C18—H18B0.9600
C7—H7C0.9600C18—H18C0.9600
C8—C91.421 (2)C19—H19A0.9600
C8—C101.470 (2)C19—H19B0.9600
C9—N11.147 (2)C19—H19C0.9600
C10—O21.223 (2)
C2—C1—O1121.73 (15)C13—C11—C12117.26 (14)
C2—C1—C7126.75 (18)C13—C11—C10124.94 (15)
O1—C1—C7111.51 (15)C12—C11—C10117.57 (14)
C1—C2—C3121.56 (16)N2—C12—C11176.67 (19)
C1—C2—H2119.2C11—C13—C17125.09 (14)
C3—C2—H2119.2C11—C13—C14121.37 (15)
C8—C3—C4124.46 (14)C17—C13—C14113.53 (14)
C8—C3—C2121.12 (15)C15—C14—C13122.65 (15)
C4—C3—C2114.39 (14)C15—C14—H14118.7
C5—C4—C3121.60 (15)C13—C14—H14118.7
C5—C4—H4119.2C14—C15—O3121.20 (14)
C3—C4—H4119.2C14—C15—C19126.78 (16)
C4—C5—O1121.51 (16)O3—C15—C19112.01 (14)
C4—C5—C6126.76 (16)C17—C16—O3122.46 (15)
O1—C5—C6111.71 (14)C17—C16—C18126.40 (16)
C5—C6—H6A109.5O3—C16—C18111.14 (14)
C5—C6—H6B109.5C16—C17—C13121.18 (15)
H6A—C6—H6B109.5C16—C17—H17119.4
C5—C6—H6C109.5C13—C17—H17119.4
H6A—C6—H6C109.5C16—C18—H18A109.5
H6B—C6—H6C109.5C16—C18—H18B109.5
C1—C7—H7A109.5H18A—C18—H18B109.5
C1—C7—H7B109.5C16—C18—H18C109.5
H7A—C7—H7B109.5H18A—C18—H18C109.5
C1—C7—H7C109.5H18B—C18—H18C109.5
H7A—C7—H7C109.5C15—C19—H19A109.5
H7B—C7—H7C109.5C15—C19—H19B109.5
C3—C8—C9117.56 (14)H19A—C19—H19B109.5
C3—C8—C10124.29 (15)C15—C19—H19C109.5
C9—C8—C10118.07 (14)H19A—C19—H19C109.5
N1—C9—C8177.40 (19)H19B—C19—H19C109.5
O2—C10—C8122.05 (15)C1—O1—C5119.20 (13)
O2—C10—C11120.33 (15)C15—O3—C16118.93 (12)
C8—C10—C11117.62 (14)
O1—C1—C2—C31.2 (3)C12—C11—C13—C17177.06 (15)
C7—C1—C2—C3177.46 (17)C10—C11—C13—C172.8 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C8177.42 (15)C12—C11—C13—C144.0 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40.5 (2)C10—C11—C13—C14178.25 (15)
C8—C3—C4—C5178.45 (15)C11—C13—C14—C15178.69 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C50.7 (2)C17—C13—C14—C152.3 (2)
C3—C4—C5—O11.0 (2)C13—C14—C15—O32.7 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6177.63 (16)C13—C14—C15—C19176.24 (16)
C4—C3—C8—C9178.33 (15)O3—C16—C17—C131.1 (2)
C2—C3—C8—C94.0 (2)C18—C16—C17—C13179.01 (15)
C4—C3—C8—C101.6 (2)C11—C13—C17—C16179.40 (15)
C2—C3—C8—C10179.27 (15)C14—C13—C17—C160.4 (2)
C3—C8—C10—O223.9 (3)C2—C1—O1—C50.9 (2)
C9—C8—C10—O2152.77 (18)C7—C1—O1—C5178.00 (15)
C3—C8—C10—C11156.50 (15)C4—C5—O1—C10.3 (2)
C9—C8—C10—C1126.8 (2)C6—C5—O1—C1178.58 (15)
O2—C10—C11—C1326.7 (3)C14—C15—O3—C161.0 (2)
C8—C10—C11—C13152.82 (16)C19—C15—O3—C16178.02 (14)
O2—C10—C11—C12147.49 (18)C17—C16—O3—C150.9 (2)
C8—C10—C11—C1233.0 (2)C18—C16—O3—C15179.25 (14)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C4—H4···O20.932.262.876 (2)123
C17—H17···O20.932.332.908 (2)120
C6—H6A···N1i0.962.623.557 (3)166
C18—H18A···N2ii0.962.483.425 (3)169
C19—H19A···O2iii0.962.553.446 (3)155
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y+1, z; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) x, y+1, z+2.
 

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the European Union-Next Generation EU, within the project PRIN 2022 `Organic Solar Cells: identification and removal of charge recombination pathways' (MUR P2022WXPMB, CUP E53D23009360006).

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: European Union-Next Generation EU (grant No. P2022WXPMB).

References

Return to citationAltomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationAtmani, C., Setifi, F., Benmansour, S., Triki, S., Marchivie, M., Salaün, J.-Y. & Gómez-García, C. J. (2008). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 11, 921–924.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBonomo, M., Carella, A., Borbone, F., Rosato, L., Dini, D. & Gontrani, L. (2020). Dyes Pigments 175, 108140.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2000). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationD'Amico, F., de Jong, B., Bartolino, M., Franchi, D., Dessi, A., Zani, L., Yzeiri, X., Gatto, E., Santucci, A., Di Carlo, A., Reginato, G., Cinà, G. & Vesce, L. (2023). Materials 16, 7338.  PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationde Oliveira, V. E., Diniz, R., Rodrigues, B. L. & de Oliveira, L. F. C. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o3358–o3360.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationDuisenberg, A. J. M., Hooft, R. W. W., Schreurs, A. M. M. & Kroon, J. (2000). J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 893–898.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationDuisenberg, A. J. M., Kroon-Batenburg, L. M. J. & Schreurs, A. M. M. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 220–229.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationFusco, S., Barra, M., Bonomo, M., Cassinese, A., Centore, R., Chiarella, F., Senneca, F. & Carella, A. (2021). Dyes Pigments 186, 109026.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationFusco, S., Barra, M., Gontrani, L., Bonomo, M., Chianese, F., Galliano, S., Centore, R., Cassinese, A., Carbone, M. & Carella, A. (2022). Chem. A Eur. J. 28, e202104552.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHeravi, M. M., Janati, F. & Zadsirjan, V. (2020). Monatsh. Chem. 151, 439–482.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationJones, G. (1967). Org. React. 15, 204–599.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKlewe, B., Werner, P., Seppälä, I. J., Hedberg, K., Schaumburg, K. & Ehrenberg, L. (1971). Acta Chem. Scand. 25, 1988–1998.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMacrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226–235.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMedici, A., Fantin, G., Fogagnolo, M., Pedrini, P., Dondoni, A. & Andreetti, G. D. (1984). J. Org. Chem. 49, 590–596.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationNonius (1999). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationShiraki, S., Natarajan, A. & Garcia-Garibay, M. A. (2011). Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 10, 1480–1487.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSpackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationYahya, M., Bouziani, A., Ocak, C., Seferoğlu, Z. & Sillanpää, M. (2021). Dyes Pigments 192, 109227.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationYao, H., Wang, J., Xu, Y. & Hou, J. (2023). Chem. Mater. 35, 807–821.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds