research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis of 2-(eth­­oxy­carbon­yl)quinolinium tetra­chlorido(quinoline-2-carboxyl­ato-κ2N,O)stannate(IV) monohydrate

crossmark logo

aEnvironmental and Structural Molecular Chemistry Research Unit, URCHEMS, Faculty of Exact Sciences, University of Constantine 1-Mentouri Brothers, 25000, Algeria, bNational Higher School for Hydraulics, Abdellah Arbaoui, Blida, Algeria, and cCNRS, Rennes Institute of Chemical Sciences -UMR 6226, University of Rennes, France
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by A. Briceno, Venezuelan Institute of Scientific Research, Venezuela (Received 2 March 2026; accepted 14 April 2026; online 29 April 2026)

The asymmetric unit of the title hydrated complex salt, (C12H12NO2)[Sn(C10H6NO2)Cl4]·H2O, consists of one 2-(eth­oxy­carbon­yl)quinolinium cation, one tetra­chlorido­(quinolinium-2-carboxyl­ato)stannate(IV) anion and one water mol­ecule. The compound was obtained by reaction of quinaldic acid with tin(II) chloride dihydrate in ethanol. The SnIV atom is six-coordinated by four chloride ligands and by one N and one O atom from the quinolinium-2-carboxyl­ate ligand, forming a distorted octa­hedral coordination environment. In the mol­ecular structure, intra­molecular O—H⋯O and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds are observed. In the crystal, N—H⋯O, C—H⋯O and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds link the components into a three-dimensional network. In addition, Y—Xπ (Sn—Cl⋯π) and ππ stacking inter­actions involving three aromatic rings are present, with centroid–centroid separations in the range 3.633 (2)–3.864 (2) Å.

1. Chemical context

Quinolinium derivatives bearing carboxyl­ate groups are attractive ligands because they combine an aromatic nitro­gen donor with a carboxyl­ate oxygen donor site, enabling N,O-chelation toward metal centres. Such N,O-chelating systems are widely encountered in coordination chemistry and are known to stabilize a variety of metal ions and coordination geometries (Constable, 2008View full citation; Aromí et al., 2012View full citation). In addition, the aromatic quinoline framework may participate in supra­molecular ππ stacking inter­actions, which can influence crystal packing.

Organotin(IV) compounds containing carboxyl­ate ligands exhibit significant structural diversity (Ingham et al., 1960View full citation), with coordination numbers typically ranging from four to six, depending on ligand binding modes and reaction conditions (Ariza-Roldán et al., 2023View full citation; Tiekink, 1991View full citation). Carboxyl­ate ligands can adopt various coordination modes (monodentate, bidentate chelating, bridging), leading to discrete mol­ecular species or extended architectures (Hulushe et al., 2024View full citation; Murali et al., 2023View full citation).

The combination of a quinolinium-2-carboxyl­ate ligand with a tin chloride precursor may therefore give rise to hybrid systems in which metal coordination and inter­molecular inter­actions coexist within the same structure. The present study reports the synthesis and structural characterization of such a compound.

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

The title salt (Fig. 1[link]) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n and is composed of a tetra­chlorido­(N,O-chelated quinolinium-2-carboxyl­atostannate(IV) anion, a protonated 2-(eth­oxy­carbon­yl)quinolinium cation and one water mol­ecule.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Mol­ecular view of the asymmetric unit showing: (a) the cationic component and the water mol­ecule, (b) the anionic component. Intra­molecular hydrogen bonds involving the quinolinium N—H donor and carboxyl­ate O acceptor, as well as weak C—H⋯Cl contacts are shown as dashed lines. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

In the anion (Fig. 1[link]b), the SnIV center shows a distorted octa­hedral coordination environment formed by four chloride ligands and by the N and O donor atoms of the quinolinium-2-carboxyl­ate ligand (Table 1[link]). The most obvious source of distortion is the bite of the chelate: the O1—Sn1—N1 angle is only 75.87 (7)°, whereas the trans arrangement O1—Sn1—Cl3 is almost linear [176.38 (5)°]. The Sn—Cl distances are slightly spread [2.3779 (7)–2.4152 (7) Å], consistent with a non-regular octa­hedron, while the Sn—O and Sn—N bonds [2.0912 (17) and 2.2959 (18) Å, respectively] match well with coordination by a carboxyl­ate oxygen and a quinoline nitro­gen.

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °)

Sn1—Cl3 2.3919 (6) O1—C1 1.280 (3)
Sn1—Cl4 2.4152 (7) O3—C11 1.323 (3)
Sn1—Cl2 2.3779 (7) O3—C21 1.474 (3)
Sn1—Cl1 2.3796 (7) O4—C11 1.195 (3)
Sn1—O1 2.0912 (17) O2—C1 1.225 (3)
Sn1—N1 2.2959 (18)    
       
O1—Sn1—Cl3 176.38 (5) O1—Sn1—N1 75.87 (7)
       
C11—O3—C21—C22 −172.0 (3)    

The cation (Fig. 1[link]a) is a protonated quinolinium species (N2–H2) bearing an eth­oxy­carbonyl substituent. The ester group displays the expected bond-length pattern, with a short carbonyl C=O bond [O4=C11 = 1.195 (3) Å] and a longer single C—O bond [O3—C11 = 1.323 (3) Å]. The eth­oxy fragment is attached through O3—C21 [1.474 (3) Å] and adopts a common extended conformation [C11—O3—C21—C22 = −172.0 (3)°]. The crystal structure also contains a water mol­ecule, which acts as a potential hydrogen-bond donor in the subsequent supra­molecular assembly. Intra­molecular contacts include N2—H2⋯O4 and C7—H7⋯Cl3, with H⋯A separations of 2.41 and 2.61 Å, respectively (Fig. 1[link], Table 2[link]).

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O4 0.88 2.41 2.746 (3) 103
N2—H2⋯O5 0.88 1.98 2.772 (3) 149
O5—H5A⋯O2 0.87 1.90 2.769 (3) 173
O5—H5B⋯Cl4i 0.87 2.78 3.457 (2) 136
C7—H7⋯Cl3 0.95 2.61 3.370 (3) 137
C19—H19⋯O5ii 0.95 2.56 3.303 (3) 135
C21—H21B⋯Cl1iii 0.99 2.82 3.433 (3) 121
C13—H13⋯O1iv 0.95 2.86 3.449 (3) 121
C18—H18⋯Cl1v 0.95 2.92 3.601 (3) 130
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation; (v) Mathematical equation.

3. Supra­molecular features

The crystal structure exhibits a well-defined supra­molecular arrangement consolidated mainly by O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, together with weaker C—H⋯O, O—H⋯Cl and C—H⋯Cl inter­actions (Table 2[link]). These contacts organize the components into a chain motif that propagates along the b-axis direction.

In the crystal, the water mol­ecule (O5) plays a central role in the hydrogen-bonding scheme (Table 2[link]). The O5—H5··O2 and N2—H2⋯O5 inter­actions (H⋯A = 1.90 and 1.98 Å, respectively) generate R32(10) ring motifs (Etter et al., 1990View full citation), which link adjacent cations and anions. These rings are repeated along the b-axis direction, forming a continuous hydrogen-bonded chain (Fig. 2[link]).

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Crystal packing viewed along the c axis, showing the formation of hydrogen-bonded chains generated by N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds forming an R32(10) ring motif: Short, inter­mediate and long hydrogen bonds are colored yellow, red and blue, respectively.

Additional weaker contacts, namely O5—H5B⋯Cl4 and C21—H21B⋯Cl1, give rise to C(7) chains that extend parallel to the a axis, as highlighted in Fig. 2[link]. The C19—H19⋯O5 inter­action further reinforces the chain arrangement.

The overall packing is therefore constructed from alternating R32(10) ring motifs and C(7) chain segments, producing a layered arrangement parallel to the ab plane.

The three-dimensional framework is further supported by ππ stacking inter­actions. Within the anionic units, centroid–centroid separations of Cg1Cg2 = 3.633 (2) and Cg1Cg1 = 3.826 (2) Å are observed, where Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the N1/C2–C6 and C5–C10 rings, respectively (symmetry operation 1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z, Fig. 3[link]). Similar inter­actions occur between cationic units, with a centroid–centroid distance of 3.864 (2) Å (symmetry operation −x, 1 − y, 1 − z) (Fig. 4[link]).

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Illustration of ππ stacking inter­actions between aromatic rings of the anionic tin(IV) complex. Centroid–centroid distances (Cg1⋯Cg2/Cg1⋯Cg1) are indicated, highlighting the role of aromatic stacking in the crystal stabilization.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Illustration of ππ stacking inter­actions between aromatic rings of the quinolinium cation Centroid–centroid distances (Cg1⋯Cg2) are indicated by black dotted lines.

In addition, an Sn1—Cl4⋯π inter­action involving the C15–C20 ring (symmetry operation Mathematical equation + x, Mathematical equation − y, Mathematical equation + z) is present, with a Cl⋯centroid separation of 3.824 (1) Å, contributing to the overall packing consolidation (Fig. 5[link]).

[Figure 5]
Figure 5
View of weak Sn—Cl⋯ π inter­actions linking neighboring cationic units, contributing to the three-dimensional supra­molecular architecture. Relevant inter­molecular distances are indicated.

4. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, version 2025.3.1, update of November 2025; Groom et al., 2016View full citation) for similar compounds was undertaken.

NIPBUN (Benlatreche, 2023View full citation) crystallizes in the C2/c space group and is distinguished from the title compound by the absence of a water mol­ecule and the substitution of the ethyl group with a hydrogen atom. PAYGAZ (Najafi et al., 2012View full citation) adopts the P21/c space group. Its structure differs from that of the title compound by the absence of a water mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit and by the replacement of the ethyl group with an isopropyl group. TITNEQ (Wang et al., 2008View full citation) crystallizes in the same space group as PAYGAZ and contains the same cation as the title compound; the main difference is presence of a butyl substituent replacing a Cl atom of the anion.

AYISUX (Najafi et al., 2011View full citation) crystallizes in the PMathematical equation space group. While it contains the same anion as the title compound, it differs by the presence of a 4-(di­methyl­amino)­pyridinium cation instead of the original cation and by the absence of the water mol­ecule in the crystal structure. KURQUK (Vafaee et al., 2010View full citation) exhibits a structural arrangement similar to that of the title compound. It differs, however, by the presence of a methanol mol­ecule in place of the water mol­ecule, as well as by the replacement of the ethyl group with a methyl group.

5. Hirshfeld surface analysis

A Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009View full citation) was performed using CrystalExplorer 21.5 (Spackman et al., 2021View full citation) to qu­antify the inter­molecular inter­actions governing the crystal packing. The HS mapped over dnorm highlights close inter­molecular contacts through distinct red regions corresponding to O—H⋯O, N—H⋯O and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen-bonding inter­actions. Additional evidence for ππ stacking is provided by the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over shape-index (Fig. 6[link]k) and curvedness (Fig. 6[link]l).

[Figure 6]
Figure 6
Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over dnorm and corresponding two-dimensional fingerprint plots of the title compound. For the anion: (a) Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl, (b) H⋯H, (c) O⋯H/H⋯O, (d) C⋯H/H⋯C, and (e) C⋯C contacts. For the cation: (f) H⋯H, (g) O⋯H/H⋯O, (h) C⋯H/H⋯C, (i) Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl, and (j) C⋯C contacts. Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over (j) shape-index and (k) curvedness.

For the anion, the two-dimensional fingerprint plots reveal that H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H (Fig. 6[link]a) contacts give the dominant contribution (47.4%), reflecting the prevalence of C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds in the packing. H⋯H contacts (Fig. 6[link]b) account for 17.2%, indicating significant dispersive inter­actions, while O⋯H/H⋯O contacts (Fig. 6[link]c) contribute 11.6%, consistent with hydrogen bonding involving the carboxyl­ate oxygen atoms. The H⋯C/C⋯H contacts (Fig. 6[link]d) (8.0%) correspond to C—H⋯π hydrogen bonds, and the C⋯C contacts (Fig. 6[link]e, 7.8%) are indicative of ππ stacking inter­actions. Minor contributions arise from C⋯Cl/Cl⋯C contacts (3%) and other contacts below 1%.

For the cation, the Hirshfeld surface is dominated by H⋯H contacts (35.1%, Fig. 6[link]f), highlighting the importance of dispersive inter­actions. O⋯H/H⋯O contacts (Fig. 6[link]g) represent 20.5% of the surface area and are attributable to N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The H⋯C/C⋯H contacts (Fig. 6[link]h) contribute 15.2%, consistent with C—H⋯π inter­actions, while H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H contacts (Fig. 6[link]i) account for 13.1%. The C⋯C contacts (7.6%, Fig. 6[link]j) confirm the presence of ππ stacking inter­actions, whereas C⋯Cl/Cl⋯C contacts (3.4%) and other minor contacts contribute only marginally.

Overall, the combined analysis of the Hirshfeld surface mapped over dnorm, shape-index and curvedness and the fingerprint plots demonstrate that the crystal packing is governed by a balance between hydrogen bonding, halogen-involving contacts, ππ stacking inter­actions and dispersive forces.

6. Synthesis and crystallization

The compound was prepared by refluxing for 6 h a solution of tin(II) chloride dihydrate (0.113 g, 0.5 mmol) in ethanol (25 mL) with quinaldic acid (0.086 g, 0.5 mmol) dissolved in the same solvent. A few drops of concentrated hydro­chloric acid were added to the reaction mixture. The resulting white solid was collected by filtration. The oxidation of SnII to SnIV most likely occurred during reflux in air.

Colorless crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by slow crystallization of the filtrate from acetone at room temperature over seven days. Yield: 87%.

IR (KBr, cm−1): 3454 (O—H), 3135 (C—H), 1623 (C=N), 1540 (C=C), 1484–1457 (C—H), 1357 (COO), 1310 (C—O), 590 (Sn—O), 470 (Sn—Cl).

7. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3[link]. C-bound H atoms were placed geometrically and refined as riding atoms [C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C)]. The hydrogen atoms attached to nitro­gen and oxygen were located in difference-Fourier maps and refined with distance restraints (N—H = 0.88 Å, O—H = 0.87 Å), with Uiso(H) set to 1.2Ueq(N) and 1.5Ueq(O).

Table 3
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula (C12H12NO2)[Sn(C10H6NO2)Cl4]·H2O
Mr 652.89
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 9.0191 (4), 17.3856 (9), 16.0742 (7)
β (°) 95.063 (3)
V3) 2510.6 (2)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.48
Crystal size (mm) 0.41 × 0.35 × 0.21
 
Data collection
Diffractometer D8 VENTURE Bruker AXS
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 36638, 5735, 5120
Rint 0.037
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.650
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.027, 0.059, 1.08
No. of reflections 5735
No. of parameters 312
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.37, −0.36
Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2015View full citation), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

2-(Ethoxycarbonyl)quinolinium tetrachlorido(quinoline-2-carboxylato-κ2N,O)stannate(IV) monohydrate top
Crystal data top
(C12H12NO2)[Sn(C10H6NO2)Cl4]·H2OF(000) = 1296
Mr = 652.89Dx = 1.727 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.0191 (4) ÅCell parameters from 8949 reflections
b = 17.3856 (9) Åθ = 2.3–27.5°
c = 16.0742 (7) ŵ = 1.48 mm1
β = 95.063 (3)°T = 150 K
V = 2510.6 (2) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 40.41 × 0.35 × 0.21 mm
Data collection top
D8 VENTURE Bruker AXS
diffractometer
5120 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 10.4167 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.037
rotation images scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
h = 1111
k = 2222
36638 measured reflectionsl = 2020
5735 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0057P)2 + 2.9951P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.059(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
S = 1.08Δρmax = 0.37 e Å3
5735 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.36 e Å3
312 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0039 (2)
Primary atom site location: dual
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Sn10.87992 (2)0.85623 (2)0.63873 (2)0.02860 (6)
Cl31.02063 (7)0.95405 (4)0.71472 (4)0.04512 (16)
Cl40.76618 (8)0.82289 (4)0.76437 (4)0.04795 (16)
Cl20.96047 (8)0.89570 (4)0.50842 (4)0.04680 (16)
Cl11.06888 (8)0.76150 (4)0.66430 (5)0.05258 (18)
O10.74573 (19)0.77227 (9)0.57682 (12)0.0390 (4)
O30.4585 (2)0.36787 (10)0.30635 (11)0.0416 (4)
O40.5664 (2)0.44352 (11)0.40783 (12)0.0440 (4)
N10.6575 (2)0.91778 (10)0.60494 (11)0.0274 (4)
O20.5144 (2)0.73894 (11)0.53402 (13)0.0518 (5)
O50.5333 (2)0.62082 (12)0.41992 (14)0.0521 (5)
H5A0.5252330.6605130.4521710.078*
H5B0.5164950.6389590.3695270.078*
N20.2983 (2)0.51761 (11)0.41244 (12)0.0321 (4)
H20.3822780.5398460.4312330.039*
C60.6161 (3)0.99322 (13)0.61617 (14)0.0294 (5)
C160.1678 (3)0.55499 (14)0.42247 (14)0.0321 (5)
C70.7236 (3)1.05195 (14)0.62800 (16)0.0383 (5)
H70.8263361.0399460.6281470.046*
C110.4595 (3)0.41997 (13)0.36641 (15)0.0343 (5)
C20.5530 (3)0.86531 (14)0.58426 (15)0.0324 (5)
C130.1751 (3)0.41027 (15)0.34784 (16)0.0392 (6)
H130.1793670.3607140.3232680.047*
C150.0326 (3)0.51842 (15)0.39287 (16)0.0378 (5)
C120.3047 (3)0.44922 (13)0.37563 (14)0.0315 (5)
C50.4623 (3)1.01320 (14)0.61270 (15)0.0352 (5)
C10.6060 (3)0.78562 (14)0.56387 (15)0.0358 (5)
C40.3560 (3)0.95500 (17)0.59421 (18)0.0451 (6)
H40.2529040.9665800.5928480.054*
C170.1682 (3)0.62822 (15)0.45981 (17)0.0399 (6)
H170.2589510.6518170.4806200.048*
C200.1023 (3)0.55863 (18)0.4016 (2)0.0507 (7)
H200.1948690.5356980.3827730.061*
C80.6796 (3)1.12639 (15)0.63930 (19)0.0478 (7)
H80.7528511.1656140.6472420.057*
C140.0409 (3)0.44497 (16)0.35670 (18)0.0448 (6)
H140.0483960.4188740.3380210.054*
C30.4009 (3)0.88209 (16)0.57827 (18)0.0424 (6)
H30.3296910.8431170.5632700.051*
C210.6063 (3)0.33869 (19)0.2895 (2)0.0525 (7)
H21A0.6496000.3081080.3376660.063*
H21B0.6740410.3822000.2808220.063*
C180.0352 (3)0.66467 (17)0.46549 (18)0.0487 (7)
H180.0339610.7145990.4894330.058*
C190.0994 (3)0.6296 (2)0.4366 (2)0.0553 (8)
H190.1903310.6560180.4416000.066*
C100.4233 (3)1.09112 (17)0.62584 (18)0.0483 (7)
H100.3212221.1049090.6250910.058*
C90.5285 (4)1.14585 (16)0.63936 (18)0.0497 (7)
H90.5004791.1975580.6489300.060*
C220.5889 (4)0.2902 (2)0.2140 (2)0.0696 (10)
H22A0.5449890.3207840.1668970.104*
H22B0.5235790.2466840.2236770.104*
H22C0.6865560.2710210.2013810.104*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Sn10.02830 (9)0.02496 (8)0.03243 (9)0.00056 (6)0.00209 (6)0.00335 (6)
Cl30.0418 (3)0.0414 (3)0.0508 (4)0.0070 (3)0.0037 (3)0.0130 (3)
Cl40.0506 (4)0.0566 (4)0.0376 (3)0.0054 (3)0.0088 (3)0.0084 (3)
Cl20.0480 (4)0.0535 (4)0.0406 (3)0.0047 (3)0.0130 (3)0.0017 (3)
Cl10.0433 (4)0.0426 (4)0.0705 (5)0.0157 (3)0.0028 (3)0.0019 (3)
O10.0393 (10)0.0276 (8)0.0496 (10)0.0009 (7)0.0020 (8)0.0086 (7)
O30.0388 (10)0.0415 (10)0.0431 (10)0.0099 (8)0.0031 (8)0.0083 (8)
O40.0381 (10)0.0443 (10)0.0474 (11)0.0042 (8)0.0085 (8)0.0068 (8)
N10.0269 (9)0.0265 (9)0.0287 (9)0.0007 (7)0.0020 (7)0.0015 (7)
O20.0557 (12)0.0370 (10)0.0605 (13)0.0160 (9)0.0070 (10)0.0102 (9)
O50.0466 (11)0.0487 (11)0.0603 (13)0.0085 (9)0.0004 (10)0.0108 (10)
N20.0284 (10)0.0328 (10)0.0344 (10)0.0029 (8)0.0013 (8)0.0021 (8)
C60.0323 (11)0.0277 (11)0.0275 (11)0.0022 (9)0.0004 (9)0.0019 (9)
C160.0305 (11)0.0378 (12)0.0281 (11)0.0002 (9)0.0024 (9)0.0040 (9)
C70.0374 (13)0.0305 (12)0.0453 (14)0.0010 (10)0.0057 (11)0.0026 (10)
C110.0384 (13)0.0302 (12)0.0334 (12)0.0048 (10)0.0012 (10)0.0037 (9)
C20.0315 (12)0.0346 (12)0.0306 (11)0.0057 (9)0.0008 (9)0.0003 (9)
C130.0408 (14)0.0338 (13)0.0422 (14)0.0076 (10)0.0005 (11)0.0034 (10)
C150.0302 (12)0.0453 (14)0.0378 (13)0.0031 (10)0.0030 (10)0.0046 (11)
C120.0348 (12)0.0281 (11)0.0312 (12)0.0008 (9)0.0000 (9)0.0008 (9)
C50.0340 (12)0.0392 (13)0.0322 (12)0.0059 (10)0.0023 (10)0.0013 (10)
C10.0437 (14)0.0291 (12)0.0342 (12)0.0068 (10)0.0018 (10)0.0025 (10)
C40.0279 (12)0.0541 (16)0.0532 (16)0.0044 (11)0.0039 (11)0.0002 (13)
C170.0401 (14)0.0391 (14)0.0408 (14)0.0037 (11)0.0047 (11)0.0036 (11)
C200.0332 (14)0.0622 (19)0.0569 (18)0.0006 (13)0.0056 (12)0.0051 (15)
C80.0598 (18)0.0290 (13)0.0516 (16)0.0003 (12)0.0106 (14)0.0052 (11)
C140.0355 (14)0.0487 (15)0.0491 (16)0.0127 (12)0.0029 (12)0.0009 (12)
C30.0302 (12)0.0456 (14)0.0505 (16)0.0090 (11)0.0003 (11)0.0000 (12)
C210.0401 (15)0.0610 (19)0.0556 (18)0.0146 (13)0.0004 (13)0.0106 (14)
C180.0551 (17)0.0471 (16)0.0452 (15)0.0120 (13)0.0114 (13)0.0033 (12)
C190.0400 (15)0.070 (2)0.0577 (18)0.0152 (14)0.0123 (14)0.0062 (15)
C100.0485 (16)0.0501 (16)0.0455 (15)0.0212 (13)0.0003 (12)0.0033 (13)
C90.0653 (19)0.0350 (14)0.0473 (16)0.0158 (13)0.0049 (14)0.0078 (12)
C220.0492 (18)0.094 (3)0.067 (2)0.0049 (18)0.0096 (16)0.024 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Sn1—Cl32.3919 (6)C13—C121.390 (3)
Sn1—Cl42.4152 (7)C13—C141.370 (4)
Sn1—Cl22.3779 (7)C15—C201.421 (4)
Sn1—Cl12.3796 (7)C15—C141.408 (4)
Sn1—O12.0912 (17)C5—C41.407 (4)
Sn1—N12.2959 (18)C5—C101.420 (4)
O1—C11.280 (3)C4—H40.9500
O3—C111.323 (3)C4—C31.362 (4)
O3—C211.474 (3)C17—H170.9500
O4—C111.195 (3)C17—C181.367 (4)
N1—C61.380 (3)C20—H200.9500
N1—C21.333 (3)C20—C191.355 (4)
O2—C11.225 (3)C8—H80.9500
O5—H5A0.8700C8—C91.404 (4)
O5—H5B0.8700C14—H140.9500
N2—H20.8800C3—H30.9500
N2—C161.366 (3)C21—H21A0.9900
N2—C121.332 (3)C21—H21B0.9900
C6—C71.409 (3)C21—C221.474 (4)
C6—C51.426 (3)C18—H180.9500
C16—C151.419 (3)C18—C191.400 (5)
C16—C171.407 (3)C19—H190.9500
C7—H70.9500C10—H100.9500
C7—C81.370 (3)C10—C91.348 (4)
C11—C121.506 (3)C9—H90.9500
C2—C11.511 (3)C22—H22A0.9800
C2—C31.397 (3)C22—H22B0.9800
C13—H130.9500C22—H22C0.9800
Cl3—Sn1—Cl489.37 (3)C4—C5—C6118.3 (2)
Cl2—Sn1—Cl393.16 (3)C4—C5—C10123.0 (2)
Cl2—Sn1—Cl4172.39 (3)C10—C5—C6118.7 (2)
Cl2—Sn1—Cl194.71 (3)O1—C1—C2117.2 (2)
Cl1—Sn1—Cl393.68 (3)O2—C1—O1124.3 (2)
Cl1—Sn1—Cl492.29 (3)O2—C1—C2118.5 (2)
O1—Sn1—Cl3176.38 (5)C5—C4—H4120.0
O1—Sn1—Cl487.69 (5)C3—C4—C5120.1 (2)
O1—Sn1—Cl289.50 (5)C3—C4—H4120.0
O1—Sn1—Cl188.55 (5)C16—C17—H17120.7
O1—Sn1—N175.87 (7)C18—C17—C16118.6 (3)
N1—Sn1—Cl3101.68 (5)C18—C17—H17120.7
N1—Sn1—Cl483.28 (5)C15—C20—H20119.9
N1—Sn1—Cl289.17 (5)C19—C20—C15120.2 (3)
N1—Sn1—Cl1163.93 (5)C19—C20—H20119.9
C1—O1—Sn1118.09 (15)C7—C8—H8119.3
C11—O3—C21114.9 (2)C7—C8—C9121.3 (3)
C6—N1—Sn1130.78 (15)C9—C8—H8119.3
C2—N1—Sn1108.91 (15)C13—C14—C15121.5 (2)
C2—N1—C6119.29 (19)C13—C14—H14119.3
H5A—O5—H5B104.5C15—C14—H14119.3
C16—N2—H2118.4C2—C3—H3120.4
C12—N2—H2118.4C4—C3—C2119.2 (2)
C12—N2—C16123.3 (2)C4—C3—H3120.4
N1—C6—C7121.0 (2)O3—C21—H21A110.0
N1—C6—C5120.0 (2)O3—C21—H21B110.0
C7—C6—C5118.9 (2)O3—C21—C22108.4 (2)
N2—C16—C15118.1 (2)H21A—C21—H21B108.4
N2—C16—C17120.7 (2)C22—C21—H21A110.0
C17—C16—C15121.2 (2)C22—C21—H21B110.0
C6—C7—H7120.0C17—C18—H18119.5
C8—C7—C6119.9 (2)C17—C18—C19121.0 (3)
C8—C7—H7120.0C19—C18—H18119.5
O3—C11—C12110.9 (2)C20—C19—C18121.3 (3)
O4—C11—O3126.5 (2)C20—C19—H19119.4
O4—C11—C12122.6 (2)C18—C19—H19119.4
N1—C2—C1116.8 (2)C5—C10—H10119.4
N1—C2—C3122.9 (2)C9—C10—C5121.1 (3)
C3—C2—C1120.3 (2)C9—C10—H10119.4
C12—C13—H13120.8C8—C9—H9120.0
C14—C13—H13120.8C10—C9—C8120.0 (2)
C14—C13—C12118.5 (2)C10—C9—H9120.0
C16—C15—C20117.7 (2)C21—C22—H22A109.5
C14—C15—C16118.0 (2)C21—C22—H22B109.5
C14—C15—C20124.4 (3)C21—C22—H22C109.5
N2—C12—C11115.0 (2)H22A—C22—H22B109.5
N2—C12—C13120.6 (2)H22A—C22—H22C109.5
C13—C12—C11124.4 (2)H22B—C22—H22C109.5
Sn1—O1—C1—O2174.3 (2)C7—C6—C5—C4175.0 (2)
Sn1—O1—C1—C27.9 (3)C7—C6—C5—C103.4 (3)
Sn1—N1—C6—C720.8 (3)C7—C8—C9—C101.8 (5)
Sn1—N1—C6—C5161.67 (16)C11—O3—C21—C22172.0 (3)
Sn1—N1—C2—C116.7 (2)C2—N1—C6—C7172.2 (2)
Sn1—N1—C2—C3165.6 (2)C2—N1—C6—C55.4 (3)
O3—C11—C12—N2158.3 (2)C15—C16—C17—C181.5 (4)
O3—C11—C12—C1320.9 (3)C15—C20—C19—C180.5 (5)
O4—C11—C12—N220.1 (3)C12—N2—C16—C150.7 (3)
O4—C11—C12—C13160.7 (3)C12—N2—C16—C17178.2 (2)
N1—C6—C7—C8179.8 (2)C12—C13—C14—C150.1 (4)
N1—C6—C5—C42.6 (3)C5—C6—C7—C82.6 (4)
N1—C6—C5—C10179.0 (2)C5—C4—C3—C22.9 (4)
N1—C2—C1—O17.5 (3)C5—C10—C9—C81.0 (4)
N1—C2—C1—O2170.4 (2)C1—C2—C3—C4177.8 (2)
N1—C2—C3—C40.1 (4)C4—C5—C10—C9176.7 (3)
N2—C16—C15—C20178.3 (2)C17—C16—C15—C200.6 (4)
N2—C16—C15—C141.5 (3)C17—C16—C15—C14179.6 (2)
N2—C16—C17—C18177.4 (2)C17—C18—C19—C200.4 (5)
C6—N1—C2—C1173.7 (2)C20—C15—C14—C13178.0 (3)
C6—N1—C2—C34.1 (3)C14—C13—C12—N22.1 (4)
C6—C7—C8—C90.0 (4)C14—C13—C12—C11177.0 (2)
C6—C5—C4—C31.5 (4)C14—C15—C20—C19179.4 (3)
C6—C5—C10—C91.6 (4)C3—C2—C1—O1174.7 (2)
C16—N2—C12—C11176.7 (2)C3—C2—C1—O27.4 (4)
C16—N2—C12—C132.6 (4)C21—O3—C11—O41.4 (4)
C16—C15—C20—C190.4 (4)C21—O3—C11—C12176.9 (2)
C16—C15—C14—C131.9 (4)C10—C5—C4—C3176.8 (3)
C16—C17—C18—C191.4 (4)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O40.882.412.746 (3)103
N2—H2···O50.881.982.772 (3)149
O5—H5A···O20.871.902.769 (3)173
O5—H5B···Cl4i0.872.783.457 (2)136
C7—H7···Cl30.952.613.370 (3)137
C19—H19···O5ii0.952.563.303 (3)135
C21—H21B···Cl1iii0.992.823.433 (3)121
C13—H13···O1iv0.952.863.449 (3)121
C18—H18···Cl1v0.952.923.601 (3)130
Symmetry codes: (i) x3/2, y+1/2, z3/2; (ii) x1, y, z; (iii) x+2, y+1, z+1; (iv) x+1, y+1, z+1; (v) x+1, y, z.
 

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere thanks to the OMC team at the University of Rennes 1, CNRS, Rennes Institute of Chemical Sciences–UMR 6226, F-35000 Rennes, France, for their invaluable assistance during BT's inter­nship and for support with the data collection.

Funding information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Algeria (MESRS) and the DGRSDT (Direction Générale de la Recherche Scientifique et du Développement Technologique, Algeria) for their financial support.

References

Return to citationAriza-Roldán, A., López-Cardoso, M., Tlahuext, H., Vargas-Pineda, G., Román-Bravo, P., Acevedo-Quiroz, M., Alvarez-Fitz, P. & Cea-Olivares, R. (2023). J. Organomet. Chem. 1002, 122924.  Google Scholar
Return to citationAromí, G., Aguilà, D., Gamez, P., Luis, F. & Roubeau, O. (2012). Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 537–546.  PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBenlatreche (2023). CSD Communication (refcode NIPBUN). CCDC, Cambridge, England.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2015). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationConstable, E. C. (2008). Coord. Chem. Rev. 252, 842–855.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationEtter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHulushe, S. T., Watkins, G. M. & Khanye, S. D. (2024). Dalton Trans. 53, 11326–11343.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationIngham, R. K., Rosenberg, S. D. & Gilman, H. (1960). Chem. Rev. 60, 459–539.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMurali, M., Bijani, C., Daran, J.-C., Manoury, E. & Poli, R. (2023). Chem. Sci. 14, 8152–8163.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationNajafi, E., Amini, M. M. & Ng, S. W. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, m1224.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationNajafi, E., Amini, M. M. & Ng, S. W. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, m732.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSpackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm 11, 19–32.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSpackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationTiekink, E. R. T. (1991). Appl. Organomet. Chem. 5, 1–23.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationVafaee, M., Amini, M. M. & Ng, S. W. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m390.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWang, H., Yin, H. & Sun, Y. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, m272.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds