research communications
SrZnSi3O8, a synthetic member of the feldspar group
aInstitute for Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Division of Applied Solid State Chemistry, Getreidemarkt 9/E164-05-1, 1060 Vienna, Austria
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
Strontium tecto-zincotrisilicate, SrZnSi3O8, is a synthetic member of the feldspar group with monoclinic symmetry (space group P21/n, Z = 4). In comparison with the alkali feldspars, the aluminium-richest tetrahedral site in these minerals is completely substituted by Zn, and the alkali metal M site by strontium. The is fully ordered, i.e. there is no mutual co-occupation of the tetrahedral sites or positional disorder of the M site. Although the tetrahedral site substituted by Zn exhibits significantly longer bond lengths [(Zn—O) = 1.973 Å] due to the incorporation of the larger cation, there is no noticeable distortion of the SiO4 tetrahedra compared to the aluminium-bearing feldspars. The of Sr2+ is [6 + 2], with six short distances to oxygen sites in a narrow range [
= 2.560 Å] and two significantly longer distances > 3.10 Å.
Keywords: crystal structure; structural comparison; framework structure; diadochy; Zn in tetrahedral coordination.
CCDC reference: 2559165
1. Chemical context
Strontium silicate, Sr2SiO4, is a well-known host material for luminescence applications. When lanthanides, especially Eu, are used as dopants, efficient white light-emitting diodes can be produced (Park et al., 2003
; Gupta et al., 2015
).
In this context, it was investigated how the luminescence properties change when the Eu-doped host material is modified by incorporating divalent cations (M = Ca, Ba, Mg, Zn) to form a possible (Sr1.9M0.1)SiO4 (Wieser, 2006
). In one of these experiments for the intended preparation of (Sr1.9Zn0.1)SiO4:Eu3+, SrZnSi3O8 has been obtained serendipitously instead. Its feldspar-type is presented and discussed in the present article.
2. Structural commentary
The probable existence of SrZnSi3O8 was predicted some time ago (Fehr & Huber, 2001
), and this phase was actually obtained during investigations of solid solutions (Ba1–xSrx)ZnSi3O8 investigated for microwave dielectric properties (Song et al., 2019
). Another phase in the system SrO/Al2O3/SiO2 has been identified to date, viz. synthetic Sr-hardysonite, Sr2ZnSi2O7 (Ardit et al., 2010
). The putative crystal structure of SrZnSi3O8 was derived from laboratory powder X-ray diffraction data and reported as triclinic with P (Song et al., 2019
). Although the corresponding article states: ‘The lattice parameters of [⋯] SrZnSi3O8 were extracted from XRD data using the least-squares method. All the peaks are indexed accordingly, and the information is given in the supplemental file', no such data are available. Therefore, no direct comparison can be made with the results of the current single crystal X-ray diffraction data. In any case, the latter data clearly revealed that the symmetry is monoclinic rather than triclinic as previously reported. The shows a feldspar-type arrangement of the tetrahedral framework and the metal position.
Feldspars define a large group of aluminium silicate minerals (class of tectosilicates; Liebau, 1985
) and are considered the most important rock-forming minerals in the Earth's crust, accounting for almost 60% of its composition. The frequently occurring alkali (M) feldspars can be described with the formula M[Al(Al,Si)3O8], or more generally M[T4O8] (where T is a tetrahedrally coordinated site), and crystallize either in the triclinic or monoclinic with parameter of a ≃ 8.4, b ≃ 13.0, c ≃ 7.2 Å, α ≃ 90, β ≃ 116, c ≃ 90° (Smith, 1974
). It is precisely this dimension of the unit cell that is also found in the crystal structure of SrZnSi3O8. This is a case of diadochy, and the tetrahedral position T1(0) (for atomic designations in feldspars, see: Smith, 1974
) is completely occupied by Zn, and Zn also does not co-occupy the other tetrahedral sites (Fig. 1
). In feldspars, the T1(0) position of the tetrahedral framework is usually occupied by the majority of Al3+ present in the structure, i.e. the cation with a lower charge than Si4+. In simplified terms, this trend continues in SrZnSi3O8 with the even lower charged Zn2+, and electron neutrality in the overall structure is ensured by the doubly charged alkaline earth metal Sr2+, which occupies the M site. This substitution at the T1(0) site with a considerably larger cation (0.60 Å for Zn2+ versus 0.39 Å for Al3+, Shannon, 1976
) results in longer T1(0)—O bonds (average 1.973 Å, Table 1
). Compared with the alkaline earth homologues CaZnSi3O8 (Heuer et al., 1998
) and BaZnSi3O8 (Zou et al., 2021
), which also exhibit feldspar-like crystal structures, the Zn—O distances are similar. CaZnSi3O8: 1.916 (3), 1.941 (3), 1.943 (3), 2.047 (3) Å [P, a = 8.121 (1), b = 12.927 (1), c = 7.206 (1) Å, α = 93.76 (5), β = 116.120 (7), γ = 84.368 (7)°, Z = 2, single crystal X-ray data, distances calculated from the deposited (CIF), entry 409286 in the Inorganic Database (ICSD; Zagorac et al., 2019
)]; BaZnSi3O8: 1.875 (12), 1.923 (9), 1.972 (11), 1.980 (10) Å [P21/a, a = 8.725 (10), b = 13.072 (20), c = 7.307 (10) Å, β = 115.85 (2)°, Z = 4, powder synchrotron X-ray data, distances taken from the publication: note that in this publication and the corresponding deposited entry 113904 in the ICSD, the fractional coordinates of the Zn site are incorrect, with x = 0.012 most likely the correct value].
|
| Figure 1 The crystal structure of SrZnSi3O8 in a projection along [00 |
The three SiO4 tetrahedra in the remaining framework of SrZnSi3O8 are not significantly distorted and show the usual Si—O bond lengths distributions (Table 1
; averaged values: Si1 1.609, Si2 1.616, Si3 1.621 Å), in very good agreement with the mean bond length of 1.62 Å for an SiO4 tetrahedron (Liebau, 1985
).
The coordination number (CN) of Sr can be described as [6 + 2], with six closer distances in a narrow range (average 2.560 Å) and two considerably longer Sr—O distances > 3.10 Å (Table 1
). The closest matching polyhedron for CN = 6 was calculated with the Polynator program (Link & Niewa, 2023
) and is a twisted trigonal prism (idealized point group 32, deviation from idealized values δ = 13.690), and the two O atoms at longer distances cap opposite faces (Fig. 2
).
| Figure 2 Coordination environment of the Sr1 site. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 90% probability level; symmetry codes refer to Table 1 |
The plausibility of the SrZnSi3O8 structure model was verified and confirmed using bond-valence-sum calculations (Brown, 2002
) performed with the ECoN21 program (Ilinca, 2022
). The calculated bond-valence sums (Table 2
) are close to the expected values, and the global instability index (GII) of 0.10 valence units indicates a stable and not particularly strained crystal structure (Salinas-Sanchez et al., 1992
; Brown, 2009
).
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The same formula type, the same type and similar lattice parameters might suggest that SrZnSi3O8 and BaZnSi3O8 are isotypic to one another. However, a closer look at the crystal structures (under consideration of the corrected x parameter for Zn1 in the BaZnSi3O8 structure, see above) reveals that the two crystalline phases are isopointal (Lima-de-Faria et al., 1990
). As shown in Fig. 3
, the crystal structures are clearly distinct from one another, with a different arrangement of the alkaline earth metal sites and the positions of ZnO4 tetrahedra within the tetrahedral framework.
| Figure 3 Comparison of the crystal structures of SrZnSi3O8 (a), projection along [ |
3. Synthesis and crystallization
SiO2 (Fluka, purum), SrCO3 (Merck, pure) and ZnO were weighted according to a composition of Sr1.9Zn0.1SiO4 (total 2 g). During intensive mixing of the powders in an achate mortar, small amounts of EuF3 (Aldrich, 99+; approx. 10 mg) were added as a dopant. The mixture was then compressed to a pellet that was heated in a corundum crucible at 1543 K for one day. After the reaction, the slightly yellowish sample appeared glassy in some places. A small colourless single crystal of the title compound was extracted from this matrix.
4. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure details are summarized in Table 3
. The non-reduced setting of the unit cell was used to emphasize the relationship to the crystal structures of other feldspar group minerals (e.g. microcline, low-albite, high-albite, reedmergernite) listed by Smith (1974
). Similarly, the atomic labelling [Zn1 = T1(0), Si1 = T1(m), Si2 = T2(0), Si3 = T2(m), O1 = OA(1), O2 = OA(2), O3 = OB(0), O4 = OB(m), O5 = OC(0), O6 = OC(m), O7 = OD(0), O8 = OD(m)] and atomic coordinates were also adjusted to the atomic parameters listed there. In order to check for any possible co-occupation of Zn and Si (and vice versa), the site occupation factor (s.o.f.) of each Zn1, Si1, Si2 and Si3 site was freely refined (constraining all other sites to be fully occupied). In all cases, the free refinement converged at s.o.f. values very close to 1.0, showing no co-occupation.
|
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 2559165
contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989026005852/yy2023sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989026005852/yy2023Isup2.hkl
| SrZnSi3O8 | F(000) = 696 |
| Mr = 365.26 | Dx = 3.414 Mg m−3 |
| Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| a = 8.3060 (8) Å | Cell parameters from 2419 reflections |
| b = 13.0111 (13) Å | θ = 3.1–30.0° |
| c = 7.2454 (7) Å | µ = 11.40 mm−1 |
| β = 114.822 (2)° | T = 293 K |
| V = 710.67 (12) Å3 | Fragment, colourless |
| Z = 4 | 0.06 × 0.04 × 0.03 mm |
| Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer | 2057 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1745 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.035 |
| ω–scans | θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 3.1° |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015) | h = −11→11 |
| Tmin = 0.548, Tmax = 0.764 | k = −18→18 |
| 7658 measured reflections | l = −10→9 |
| Refinement on F2 | 118 parameters |
| Least-squares matrix: full | 0 restraints |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0377P)2 + 0.2907P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| wR(F2) = 0.069 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
| S = 1.03 | Δρmax = 0.88 e Å−3 |
| 2057 reflections | Δρmin = −0.67 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| Sr1 | 0.26316 (4) | 0.98248 (2) | 0.13696 (5) | 0.01620 (10) | |
| Zn1 | 0.02329 (5) | 0.18835 (3) | 0.20052 (6) | 0.01043 (10) | |
| Si1 | −0.02817 (11) | 0.83033 (6) | 0.24716 (13) | 0.00802 (17) | |
| Si2 | 0.70774 (11) | 0.12373 (7) | 0.32678 (13) | 0.00844 (17) | |
| Si3 | 0.67150 (11) | 0.89689 (7) | 0.38177 (13) | 0.00864 (17) | |
| O1 | 0.0187 (3) | 0.11994 (18) | 0.9496 (3) | 0.0128 (5) | |
| O2 | 0.6002 (3) | 0.01681 (16) | 0.3169 (3) | 0.0103 (4) | |
| O3 | 0.8042 (3) | 0.12069 (18) | 0.1797 (4) | 0.0147 (5) | |
| O4 | 0.8007 (3) | 0.87771 (19) | 0.2669 (4) | 0.0191 (5) | |
| O5 | 0.0104 (3) | 0.33381 (17) | 0.2183 (4) | 0.0132 (5) | |
| O6 | −0.0480 (3) | 0.70691 (17) | 0.2380 (4) | 0.0137 (5) | |
| O7 | 0.2234 (3) | 0.10919 (19) | 0.3782 (3) | 0.0163 (5) | |
| O8 | 0.1561 (3) | 0.85914 (19) | 0.4367 (4) | 0.0175 (5) |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Sr1 | 0.00884 (14) | 0.01500 (16) | 0.02113 (18) | 0.00124 (11) | 0.00275 (12) | −0.00635 (12) |
| Zn1 | 0.01131 (18) | 0.00930 (18) | 0.01112 (19) | 0.00110 (13) | 0.00514 (14) | −0.00009 (13) |
| Si1 | 0.0077 (4) | 0.0086 (4) | 0.0086 (4) | −0.0006 (3) | 0.0042 (3) | −0.0005 (3) |
| Si2 | 0.0078 (4) | 0.0080 (4) | 0.0093 (4) | −0.0005 (3) | 0.0034 (3) | 0.0001 (3) |
| Si3 | 0.0076 (4) | 0.0074 (4) | 0.0112 (4) | 0.0010 (3) | 0.0042 (3) | 0.0002 (3) |
| O1 | 0.0173 (11) | 0.0135 (11) | 0.0105 (11) | −0.0011 (9) | 0.0088 (9) | 0.0003 (8) |
| O2 | 0.0093 (10) | 0.0062 (10) | 0.0142 (11) | −0.0005 (8) | 0.0039 (9) | 0.0019 (8) |
| O3 | 0.0148 (11) | 0.0156 (11) | 0.0177 (12) | −0.0021 (9) | 0.0107 (10) | −0.0003 (9) |
| O4 | 0.0181 (12) | 0.0172 (12) | 0.0294 (14) | 0.0011 (10) | 0.0172 (11) | −0.0038 (10) |
| O5 | 0.0118 (10) | 0.0082 (10) | 0.0191 (12) | 0.0012 (8) | 0.0061 (9) | 0.0002 (9) |
| O6 | 0.0123 (11) | 0.0083 (10) | 0.0218 (12) | −0.0014 (8) | 0.0085 (10) | −0.0011 (9) |
| O7 | 0.0157 (11) | 0.0167 (12) | 0.0124 (12) | 0.0046 (9) | 0.0019 (10) | 0.0025 (9) |
| O8 | 0.0155 (11) | 0.0176 (12) | 0.0128 (12) | −0.0026 (9) | −0.0006 (10) | −0.0031 (9) |
| Sr1—O3i | 2.510 (2) | Si1—O1iii | 1.597 (2) |
| Sr1—O7ii | 2.523 (2) | Si1—O4vii | 1.610 (2) |
| Sr1—O1iii | 2.533 (2) | Si1—O6 | 1.613 (2) |
| Sr1—O2ii | 2.583 (2) | Si1—O8 | 1.614 (2) |
| Sr1—O5iv | 2.593 (2) | Si2—O3 | 1.580 (2) |
| Sr1—O1v | 2.617 (2) | Si2—O6ix | 1.621 (2) |
| Sr1—O8 | 3.115 (3) | Si2—O8x | 1.624 (2) |
| Sr1—O4vi | 3.294 (3) | Si2—O2 | 1.638 (2) |
| Zn1—O5 | 1.903 (2) | Si3—O7x | 1.587 (2) |
| Zn1—O7 | 1.920 (2) | Si3—O5iv | 1.601 (2) |
| Zn1—O3vii | 1.969 (2) | Si3—O4 | 1.630 (3) |
| Zn1—O1viii | 2.010 (2) | Si3—O2ii | 1.665 (2) |
| O3i—Sr1—O7ii | 159.85 (8) | O6—Si1—O8 | 108.09 (13) |
| O3i—Sr1—O1iii | 70.38 (7) | O3—Si2—O6ix | 113.99 (13) |
| O7ii—Sr1—O1iii | 98.00 (8) | O3—Si2—O8x | 112.93 (13) |
| O3i—Sr1—O2ii | 109.40 (7) | O6ix—Si2—O8x | 109.65 (14) |
| O7ii—Sr1—O2ii | 88.09 (7) | O3—Si2—O2 | 111.75 (13) |
| O1iii—Sr1—O2ii | 155.38 (7) | O6ix—Si2—O2 | 100.91 (12) |
| O3i—Sr1—O5iv | 79.41 (8) | O8x—Si2—O2 | 106.74 (13) |
| O7ii—Sr1—O5iv | 119.40 (7) | O7x—Si3—O5iv | 116.82 (14) |
| O1iii—Sr1—O5iv | 98.38 (7) | O7x—Si3—O4 | 112.02 (14) |
| O2ii—Sr1—O5iv | 58.43 (7) | O5iv—Si3—O4 | 112.87 (13) |
| O3i—Sr1—O1v | 93.71 (7) | O7x—Si3—O2ii | 108.85 (13) |
| O7ii—Sr1—O1v | 67.31 (7) | O5iv—Si3—O2ii | 101.33 (12) |
| O1iii—Sr1—O1v | 78.22 (8) | O4—Si3—O2ii | 103.38 (13) |
| O2ii—Sr1—O1v | 125.74 (7) | Si1iii—O1—Zn1xi | 129.67 (14) |
| O5iv—Sr1—O1v | 173.05 (7) | Si1iii—O1—Sr1iii | 112.26 (11) |
| O3i—Sr1—O8 | 110.02 (7) | Zn1xi—O1—Sr1iii | 96.98 (9) |
| O7ii—Sr1—O8 | 72.24 (7) | Si1iii—O1—Sr1xii | 114.94 (12) |
| O1iii—Sr1—O8 | 52.92 (6) | Zn1xi—O1—Sr1xii | 96.74 (8) |
| O2ii—Sr1—O8 | 107.66 (7) | Sr1iii—O1—Sr1xii | 101.78 (8) |
| O5iv—Sr1—O8 | 72.81 (7) | Si2—O2—Si3xiii | 131.35 (14) |
| O1v—Sr1—O8 | 109.11 (7) | Si2—O2—Sr1xiii | 128.63 (11) |
| O3i—Sr1—O4vi | 65.95 (7) | Si3xiii—O2—Sr1xiii | 99.33 (10) |
| O7ii—Sr1—O4vi | 103.62 (7) | Si2—O3—Zn1xiv | 130.61 (14) |
| O1iii—Sr1—O4vi | 106.45 (7) | Si2—O3—Sr1i | 130.42 (13) |
| O2ii—Sr1—O4vi | 95.10 (7) | Zn1xiv—O3—Sr1i | 98.83 (9) |
| O5iv—Sr1—O4vi | 126.17 (7) | Si1xiv—O4—Si3 | 154.04 (19) |
| O1v—Sr1—O4vi | 50.31 (6) | Si1xiv—O4—Sr1vi | 87.21 (11) |
| O8—Sr1—O4vi | 156.53 (6) | Si3—O4—Sr1vi | 118.31 (12) |
| O5—Zn1—O7 | 123.07 (10) | Si3ix—O5—Zn1 | 123.27 (13) |
| O5—Zn1—O3vii | 111.92 (10) | Si3ix—O5—Sr1ix | 100.79 (10) |
| O7—Zn1—O3vii | 108.89 (10) | Zn1—O5—Sr1ix | 135.84 (11) |
| O5—Zn1—O1viii | 121.42 (10) | Si1—O6—Si2iv | 137.20 (16) |
| O7—Zn1—O1viii | 92.94 (10) | Si3x—O7—Zn1 | 133.22 (15) |
| O3vii—Zn1—O1viii | 93.82 (10) | Si3x—O7—Sr1xiii | 123.71 (13) |
| O1iii—Si1—O4vii | 107.47 (13) | Zn1—O7—Sr1xiii | 102.37 (10) |
| O1iii—Si1—O6 | 114.14 (13) | Si1—O8—Si2x | 157.11 (19) |
| O4vii—Si1—O6 | 107.82 (13) | Si1—O8—Sr1 | 88.43 (10) |
| O1iii—Si1—O8 | 106.32 (13) | Si2x—O8—Sr1 | 112.89 (12) |
| O4vii—Si1—O8 | 113.13 (14) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (v) x, y+1, z−1; (vi) −x+1, −y+2, −z; (vii) x−1, y, z; (viii) x, y, z−1; (ix) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (x) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (xi) x, y, z+1; (xii) x, y−1, z+1; (xiii) x, y−1, z; (xiv) x+1, y, z. |
| Sr1 | Zn1 | Si1 | Si2 | Si3 | Σ | |
| O1 | 0.30, 0.25 | 0.43 | 1.07 | 2.05 | ||
| O2 | 0.27 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 2.13 | ||
| O3 | 0.32 | 0.47 | 1.12 | 1.91 | ||
| O4 | 0.06 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 2.09 | ||
| O5 | 0.27 | 0.56 | 1.06 | 1.89 | ||
| O6 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 2.04 | |||
| O7 | 0.31 | 0.54 | 1.10 | 1.95 | ||
| O8 | 0.09 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 2.12 | ||
| Σ | 1.87 | 2.00 | 4.17 | 4.09 | 4.05 |
Acknowledgements
Mr Gerhard Wieser kindly provided the sample for crystal extraction. The X-ray Centre of TU Wien is acknowledged for providing access to instrumentation and analysis software and TU Wien Bibliothek for financial support through its Open Access Funding Program.
References
Ardit, M., Cruciani, G. & Dondi, M. (2010). Z. Kristallogr. 225, 298–301. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Brown, I. D. (2002). The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry: The Bond Valence Model. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Brown, I. D. (2009). Chem. Rev. 109, 6858–6919. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bruker (2005). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Dowty, E. (2006). ATOMS for Windows. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA. Google Scholar
Fehr, K. T. & Huber, A. L. (2001). Am. Mineral. 86, 21–28. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gupta, S. K., Nigam, S., Yadav, A. K., Mohapatra, M., Jha, S. N., Majumder, C. & Bhattacharyya, D. (2015). New J. Chem. 39, 6531–6539. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Heuer, M., Bente, K., Steins, M. & Rothkopf, A. (1998). Z . Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 213, 691–692. CAS Google Scholar
Ilinca, G. (2022). Minerals 12, 924. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10. Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Liebau, F. (1985). Structural Chemistry of Silicates. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Lima-de-Faria, J., Hellner, E., Liebau, F., Makovicky, E. & Parthé, E. (1990). Acta Cryst. A46, 1–11. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Link, L. & Niewa, R. (2023). J. Appl. Cryst. 56, 1855–1864. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Park, J. K., Lim, M. A., Kim, C. H., Park, H. D., Park, J. T. & Choi, S. Y. (2003). Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 683–685. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Salinas-Sanchez, A., Garcia-Muñoz, J. L., Rodriguez-Carvajal, J., Saez-Puche, R. & Martinez, J. L. (1992). J. Solid State Chem. 100, 201–211. CAS Google Scholar
Shannon, R. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 751–767. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Smith, J. V. (1974). Feldspar Minerals. Part 1: Crystal Structure and Physical Properties pp. 26–107. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Song, X.-Q., Du, K., Li, J., Muhammad, R., Lu, W.-Z., Wang, X.-C. & Lei, W. (2019). Mater. Res. Bull. 112, 178–181. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wieser, G. (2006). Diploma Thesis. TU Wien, Austria. Google Scholar
Zagorac, D., Müller, H., Ruehl, S., Zagorac, J. & Rehme, S. (2019). J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 918–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zou, Z.-Y., Song, X.-Q., Jiang, L., Yuan, C.-L., Lu, W.-Z., Hu, Y.-M. & Lei, W. (2021). Chem. Eur. J. 27, 5992–5998. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

journal menu
access



