research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Synthesis and structure of 3-methylpyridinium 3-carb­oxy-5-nitrobenzoate monohydrate

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Chemistry, Pandu College, Guwahati-781012, Assam, India, and bDepartment of Chemistry, Gauhati University, Guwahati-781014, Assam, India
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by D. Chopra, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal, India (Received 3 August 2026; accepted 6 August 2026; online 11 August 2026)

The title compound, C6H8N+·C8H4NO6·H2O, crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal space group C2/c. An N—H⋯O hydrogen bond is observed between the 3-methyl­pyridinium cation and the 5-nitro­isophthalate anion. The crystal packing is consolidated by an extensive network of inter­molecular O—H⋯O, N—H⋯O, and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, further reinforced by ππ inter­actions.

1. Chemical context

Co-crystals are homogeneous crystalline solids composed of two or more neutral components in definite stoichiometric ratios, assembled under ambient conditions through non-covalent inter­actions such as hydrogen bonding, ππ stacking, and van der Waals forces (Pan et al., 2019View full citation). The key distinction between a co-crystal and a salt lies in the position of the acidic proton within the acid–base pair. When proton transfer to the base is complete, salt formation is favoured over co-crystal formation. The acidity of aromatic acids, and hence their proton-donating ability, is strongly influenced by the nature and position of substituents on the aromatic ring. Electron-withdrawing groups tend to enhance acidity, whereas electron-donating groups reduce it. Consequently, the tendency of a hydrogen-bond acceptor to form either a co-crystal or a salt depends significantly on these substituent effects.

Previous studies by Mohamed et al. (2009View full citation) have highlighted the role of pyridine–carb­oxy­lic acid and pyridinium–carboxyl­ate synthons in governing the crystal packing of binary solid systems. In addition, our group has reported co-crystals of gallic acid with 4-cyano­pyridine, demonstrating the significance of O—H⋯N inter­molecular hydrogen bonding in consolidating the structure (Goswami et al., 2021View full citation). Another study from our group describes the crystal structure of phenyl­enedi­acetic acid with 4,4′-bi­pyridine, where similar hydrogen-bonding motifs, including O—H⋯N, C—H⋯N, and C—H⋯π inter­actions, play a crucial role in consolidating the solid-state architecture (Paul & Bora, 2015View full citation).

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

The title hydrated salt (Fig. 1[link]) crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system with the space group C2/c. In this structure, 3-methyl­pyridine accepts a proton from 5-nitro­isophthalic acid, resulting in the formation of a pyridinium cation. The protonated base and the corresponding carboxyl­ate anion together constitute a salt, consolidated by N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, which can be described by the graph-set motif R22(7). In addition, the water mol­ecule of crystallization participates in an extended hydrogen-bonding network with the 5-nitro­isophthalate moiety, further reinforcing the supra­molecular assembly. Analysis of the difference-Fourier map reveals positive electron density near the nitro­gen atom (N2) at a distance of 0.88 (3) Å, consistent with a typical Nsp2—H bond length. Additionally, a negative residual electron density peak is observed near the O3 atom, indicating proton transfer between the acid and pyridine components. Consequently, the pyridinium cation is consolidated by the carboxyl­ate anion through strong hydrogen bonding, leading to the formulation of the compound as a hydrated salt, C6H8N+C8H4NO6·H2O.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability. All the non H-atoms are labelled. The dashed lines depict hydrogen bonds.

3. Supra­molecular features

The water mol­ecule of crystallization further acts as a hydrogen-bond donor through the O2—H2A⋯O4 inter­action [O⋯O = 2.718 (2) Å], linking neighbouring carboxyl­ate groups belonging to adjacent 5-nitro­isophthalate units. Consequently, the water mol­ecule functions as a supra­molecular bridge, propagating the structure into an extended hydrogen-bonded chain running through the crystal structure (Table 1[link], Fig. 2[link]). The hydrogen-bonded chains are further inter­connected through electrostatic inter­actions between the protonated 3-methyl­pyridinium cations and the negatively charged 5-nitro­isophthalate anions. Additional weak C—H⋯O contacts involving pyridinium and aromatic C—H donors with carboxyl­ate and nitro oxygen atom acceptors reinforce these connections, leading to the formation of extended supra­molecular sheets (Fig. 3[link]). Beyond hydrogen bonding, the crystal packing is further consolidated by aromatic ππ stacking inter­actions between neighbouring pyridinium and benzene rings [Cg1⋯Cg1(1 − x, y,1 /2 − z) = 3.7963 (14) Å and Cg2⋯Cg2 = 3.5924 (15) Å where Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the C1–C3/C5–C7 and N2/C9–C13 rings, respectively]. These inter­actions promote the formation of columnar arrangements along specific crystallographic directions and facilitate efficient mol­ecular packing (Fig. 4[link]). The combined effect of strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, water-mediated bridges, weak C—H⋯O inter­actions and ππ inter­actions ultimately generates a highly inter­connected three-dimensional network. Thus, the crystal structure may be viewed as a hydrogen-bond-directed framework in which water mol­ecules of crystallization play a central structure-directing role, while aromatic stacking inter­actions provide additional consolidation and packing efficiency.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C12—H12⋯O4 0.93 2.59 3.201 (3) 124
O1—H1⋯O2 0.92 (3) 1.64 (3) 2.5473 (19) 170 (3)
N2—H2⋯O3 0.89 (3) 1.77 (3) 2.643 (2) 171 (3)
O2—H2A⋯O4i 0.84 (2) 1.89 (2) 2.718 (2) 171 (3)
O2—H2B⋯O3ii 0.82 (2) 2.03 (2) 2.829 (2) 163 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Water-mediated O—H⋯O linkage showing the chain structure.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Hydrogen-bonded layer viewed down the bc plane.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
ππ stacking inter­actions between pyridinium and phenyl rings viewed down the bc plane

Table 1[link] summarizes the hydrogen-bonding parameters. The crystal structure is primarily consolidated by a network of strong and highly directional O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, with additional contributions from weaker C—H⋯O inter­actions. The O1—H1⋯O2 and N2—H2⋯O3 hydrogen bonds exhibit short H⋯A distances [1.64 (3) and 1.77 (3) Å] and nearly linear bond angles [170 (3) and 171 (3)°], indicating their significant role in enhancing the crystal cohesion. Similarly, the O2—H2A⋯O4 inter­action displays a near-linear geometry [171 (3)°] with a short H⋯A distance [1.89 (2) Å], further strengthening the supra­molecular framework. In contrast, the O2—H2B⋯O3 hydrogen bond is relatively weaker, as evidenced by its longer H⋯A distance [2.03 (2) Å] and slightly reduced bond angle [163 (3)°]. The weakest inter­action in the structure is the C12—H12⋯O4 contact, characterized by a comparatively long H⋯A distance (2.59 Å) and a markedly bent geometry (124°), typical of weak C—H⋯O inter­actions.

Thus, the crystal structure develops through a stepwise assembly process: strong O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, together with water-mediated bridges, construct the primary chains; weaker C—H⋯O inter­actions inter­connect these chains into sheets; and finally, ππ inter­actions reinforce the packing to produce a robust three-dimensional supra­molecular architecture.

4. Database survey

While several examples utilizing 3-methyl­pyridine as a supra­molecular synthon have been documented in earlier studies (Trollip et al., 2025View full citation; Yamada et al., 2013View full citation), no corresponding crystallographic examples employing 5-nitro­isophthalic acid as a supra­molecular synthon were found in the available literature.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

3-Methyl­pyridine (1mM, 0.0913 g) and 5-nitro­isopthalic acid (1mM, 0.2111 g) were taken in an oven-dried round-bottom flask. Then 20 mL of water was added and the reaction mixture was refluxed at 373 K for 5h. The resulting solution was then cooled at room temperature and kept undisturbed for crystallization. After a few days, colourless needle-shaped good-quality crystals evolved from the solution.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection parameters, and structure refinement details are compiled in Table 2[link]. The H attached to aromatic carbon atoms were refined with the riding model. The HFIX 43 (one hydrogen on an sp2-hybriduzed carbon atom) command was used to add the C-bound hydrogen atoms (C1, C7, C3, C9, C10, C11, C12, C13). Subsequently, the hydrogen atoms on the methyl carbon (C14) of the 3-methyl­pyridinium cation were added with the help of HFIX 137 (three hydrogen atoms on sp3-hybridized carbon atom) command and the hydrogen on the nitro­gen atom (N2) of the pyridinium cation was found in a difference-Fourier map. The hydrogen atom on the –COOH group (O1) was fixed with HFIX 134 (one hydrogen O—H⋯H bonded). The hydrogen atoms associated with the water mol­ecule (O2) were identified from difference-Fourier maps and refined using the DFIX command.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C6H8N+·C8H4NO6·H2O
Mr 322.27
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 296
a, b, c (Å) 14.001 (4), 14.989 (4), 14.269 (4)
β (°) 94.550 (5)
V3) 2985.2 (15)
Z 8
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.12
Crystal size (mm) 0.21 × 0.18 × 0.15
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 37111, 4407, 3029
Rint 0.066
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.709
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.069, 0.181, 1.07
No. of reflections 4407
No. of parameters 225
No. of restraints 2
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.37, −0.49
Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2012View full citation), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2019/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

3-Methylpyridinium 3-carboxy-5-nitrobenzoate monohydrate top
Crystal data top
C6H8N+·C8H4NO6·H2OF(000) = 1344
Mr = 322.27Dx = 1.434 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 14.001 (4) ÅCell parameters from 7138 reflections
b = 14.989 (4) Åθ = 2.4–28.3°
c = 14.269 (4) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
β = 94.550 (5)°T = 296 K
V = 2985.2 (15) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 80.21 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
Rint = 0.066
φ and ω scansθmax = 30.3°, θmin = 3.4°
37111 measured reflectionsh = 1919
4407 independent reflectionsk = 2121
3029 reflections with I > 2σ(I)l = 2020
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.069H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.181 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.085P)2 + 1.6623P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
4407 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.37 e Å3
225 parametersΔρmin = 0.49 e Å3
2 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.36724 (9)0.07423 (9)0.32424 (11)0.0527 (4)
O20.21930 (10)0.17216 (10)0.29414 (12)0.0500 (4)
O30.55819 (10)0.36420 (9)0.39569 (11)0.0529 (4)
O40.40090 (10)0.34674 (10)0.36377 (11)0.0571 (4)
O50.27850 (10)0.04296 (10)0.27574 (13)0.0628 (4)
O60.74673 (9)0.09885 (12)0.49234 (12)0.0647 (5)
O70.69029 (11)0.03206 (12)0.46412 (14)0.0735 (5)
N10.68314 (10)0.04850 (12)0.46136 (11)0.0457 (4)
N20.50959 (13)0.53448 (12)0.38409 (12)0.0471 (4)
C10.52059 (11)0.03101 (12)0.38648 (11)0.0352 (4)
H1A0.5289220.0305200.3889170.042*
C20.43451 (10)0.06861 (11)0.34855 (11)0.0334 (3)
C30.42381 (11)0.16076 (12)0.34615 (11)0.0348 (3)
H30.3664330.1854040.3210000.042*
C40.48381 (12)0.31673 (12)0.37892 (12)0.0401 (4)
C50.59294 (10)0.08824 (12)0.42025 (11)0.0357 (4)
C60.49779 (11)0.21682 (11)0.38085 (11)0.0349 (3)
C70.58390 (11)0.17971 (12)0.41832 (11)0.0372 (4)
H70.6341950.2160280.4415360.045*
C80.35184 (11)0.01167 (12)0.31163 (13)0.0383 (4)
C90.47158 (15)0.71004 (14)0.36545 (14)0.0517 (5)
H90.4579020.7705470.3590530.062*
C100.56465 (14)0.68319 (14)0.39173 (13)0.0480 (4)
C110.58072 (14)0.59327 (15)0.40111 (14)0.0492 (5)
H110.6420540.5728380.4195990.059*
C120.41998 (14)0.55942 (15)0.35814 (14)0.0518 (5)
H120.3721800.5168420.3466040.062*
C130.39898 (15)0.64855 (16)0.34863 (15)0.0548 (5)
H130.3367550.6671930.3311140.066*
C140.6452 (2)0.7490 (2)0.4071 (2)0.0827 (8)
H14A0.6441780.7891930.3546090.124*
H14B0.7052250.7177120.4129020.124*
H14C0.6378170.7822620.4635570.124*
H10.3152 (19)0.1097 (19)0.3067 (18)0.075 (8)*
H20.530 (2)0.479 (2)0.3936 (19)0.083 (9)*
H2A0.1873 (18)0.1635 (19)0.2430 (14)0.075 (8)*
H2B0.1809 (19)0.159 (2)0.3326 (18)0.092 (11)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0311 (6)0.0382 (7)0.0865 (10)0.0059 (5)0.0099 (6)0.0024 (7)
O20.0347 (7)0.0438 (8)0.0702 (10)0.0086 (6)0.0046 (7)0.0031 (7)
O30.0390 (7)0.0399 (7)0.0783 (10)0.0051 (5)0.0051 (6)0.0077 (6)
O40.0409 (7)0.0478 (8)0.0804 (10)0.0050 (6)0.0088 (7)0.0075 (7)
O50.0370 (7)0.0507 (8)0.0956 (12)0.0054 (6)0.0263 (7)0.0071 (8)
O60.0325 (7)0.0790 (11)0.0792 (10)0.0080 (7)0.0165 (6)0.0071 (8)
O70.0457 (8)0.0580 (10)0.1124 (15)0.0083 (7)0.0217 (8)0.0134 (9)
N10.0265 (7)0.0600 (11)0.0494 (9)0.0013 (7)0.0037 (6)0.0095 (7)
N20.0512 (9)0.0401 (9)0.0500 (9)0.0037 (7)0.0034 (7)0.0019 (7)
C10.0272 (7)0.0382 (9)0.0401 (8)0.0012 (6)0.0015 (6)0.0047 (6)
C20.0238 (7)0.0402 (9)0.0358 (8)0.0044 (6)0.0000 (6)0.0009 (6)
C30.0238 (7)0.0408 (9)0.0392 (8)0.0002 (6)0.0011 (6)0.0003 (6)
C40.0371 (8)0.0389 (9)0.0435 (9)0.0010 (7)0.0020 (7)0.0047 (7)
C50.0226 (7)0.0482 (10)0.0359 (8)0.0004 (6)0.0003 (5)0.0058 (7)
C60.0295 (7)0.0384 (9)0.0365 (8)0.0032 (6)0.0010 (6)0.0019 (6)
C70.0274 (7)0.0467 (10)0.0368 (8)0.0067 (7)0.0011 (6)0.0001 (7)
C80.0264 (7)0.0404 (9)0.0472 (9)0.0048 (6)0.0018 (6)0.0007 (7)
C90.0608 (12)0.0431 (11)0.0515 (11)0.0076 (9)0.0064 (9)0.0019 (8)
C100.0490 (10)0.0511 (11)0.0442 (9)0.0054 (9)0.0061 (8)0.0051 (8)
C110.0411 (9)0.0563 (12)0.0499 (10)0.0074 (8)0.0008 (7)0.0039 (9)
C120.0464 (10)0.0548 (12)0.0536 (11)0.0066 (9)0.0001 (8)0.0025 (9)
C130.0440 (10)0.0622 (13)0.0573 (12)0.0091 (9)0.0021 (8)0.0054 (9)
C140.0750 (17)0.0785 (19)0.095 (2)0.0280 (15)0.0090 (14)0.0142 (15)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C81.315 (2)C3—H30.9300
O1—H10.92 (3)C3—C61.394 (2)
O2—H2A0.836 (17)C4—C61.510 (3)
O2—H2B0.822 (18)C5—C71.377 (3)
O3—C41.268 (2)C6—C71.395 (2)
O4—C41.248 (2)C7—H70.9300
O5—C81.206 (2)C9—H90.9300
O6—N11.223 (2)C9—C101.387 (3)
O7—N11.212 (2)C9—C131.379 (3)
N1—C51.475 (2)C10—C111.371 (3)
N2—C111.337 (3)C10—C141.502 (3)
N2—C121.333 (3)C11—H110.9300
N2—H20.89 (3)C12—H120.9300
C1—H1A0.9300C12—C131.372 (3)
C1—C21.400 (2)C13—H130.9300
C1—C51.384 (2)C14—H14A0.9600
C2—C31.390 (2)C14—H14B0.9600
C2—C81.500 (2)C14—H14C0.9600
C8—O1—H1114.3 (17)C5—C7—H7120.7
H2A—O2—H2B102 (3)C6—C7—H7120.7
O6—N1—C5118.06 (17)O1—C8—C2113.28 (14)
O7—N1—O6123.18 (16)O5—C8—O1124.32 (16)
O7—N1—C5118.75 (15)O5—C8—C2122.38 (16)
C11—N2—H2111.7 (19)C10—C9—H9119.4
C12—N2—C11122.44 (19)C13—C9—H9119.4
C12—N2—H2125.9 (19)C13—C9—C10121.1 (2)
C2—C1—H1A121.0C9—C10—C14121.8 (2)
C5—C1—H1A121.0C11—C10—C9117.07 (19)
C5—C1—C2117.96 (16)C11—C10—C14121.1 (2)
C1—C2—C8121.58 (15)N2—C11—C10121.05 (18)
C3—C2—C1119.83 (14)N2—C11—H11119.5
C3—C2—C8118.58 (14)C10—C11—H11119.5
C2—C3—H3119.5N2—C12—H12120.3
C2—C3—C6120.99 (14)N2—C12—C13119.34 (19)
C6—C3—H3119.5C13—C12—H12120.3
O3—C4—C6116.71 (15)C9—C13—H13120.5
O4—C4—O3124.70 (17)C12—C13—C9118.95 (19)
O4—C4—C6118.55 (15)C12—C13—H13120.5
C1—C5—N1117.90 (16)C10—C14—H14A109.5
C7—C5—N1118.97 (14)C10—C14—H14B109.5
C7—C5—C1123.13 (14)C10—C14—H14C109.5
C3—C6—C4119.98 (14)H14A—C14—H14B109.5
C3—C6—C7119.40 (16)H14A—C14—H14C109.5
C7—C6—C4120.61 (14)H14B—C14—H14C109.5
C5—C7—C6118.68 (14)
O3—C4—C6—C3167.89 (16)C2—C3—C6—C4178.98 (15)
O3—C4—C6—C713.0 (2)C2—C3—C6—C70.2 (2)
O4—C4—C6—C314.0 (2)C3—C2—C8—O1174.88 (15)
O4—C4—C6—C7165.10 (16)C3—C2—C8—O53.8 (3)
O6—N1—C5—C1179.09 (16)C3—C6—C7—C50.3 (2)
O6—N1—C5—C70.0 (2)C4—C6—C7—C5178.82 (15)
O7—N1—C5—C10.1 (2)C5—C1—C2—C30.3 (2)
O7—N1—C5—C7178.97 (18)C5—C1—C2—C8179.11 (15)
N1—C5—C7—C6178.88 (14)C8—C2—C3—C6179.00 (15)
N2—C12—C13—C90.6 (3)C9—C10—C11—N21.0 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C60.1 (2)C10—C9—C13—C120.1 (3)
C1—C2—C8—O14.0 (2)C11—N2—C12—C130.2 (3)
C1—C2—C8—O5177.31 (18)C12—N2—C11—C100.6 (3)
C1—C5—C7—C60.2 (2)C13—C9—C10—C110.7 (3)
C2—C1—C5—N1179.19 (14)C13—C9—C10—C14177.9 (2)
C2—C1—C5—C70.1 (2)C14—C10—C11—N2177.5 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C12—H12···O40.932.593.201 (3)124
O1—H1···O20.92 (3)1.64 (3)2.5473 (19)170 (3)
N2—H2···O30.89 (3)1.77 (3)2.643 (2)171 (3)
O2—H2A···O4i0.84 (2)1.89 (2)2.718 (2)171 (3)
O2—H2B···O3ii0.82 (2)2.03 (2)2.829 (2)163 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x1/2, y1/2, z.
 

Footnotes

Karmajyoti Borah and Sourajyoti Ray have contributed equally in this work.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the USIC facility of Gauhati university for providing the X-ray diffraction data.

References

Return to citationBruker (2012). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGoswami, S., Ghosh, A., Borah, K., Mahanta, A., Guha, A. K. & Bora, S. J. (2021). J. Mol. Struct. 1225, 129279.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationMohamed, S., Tocher, D. A., Vickers, M., Karamertzanis, P. G. & Price, S. L. (2009). Cryst. Growth Des. 9, 2881–2889.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationPan, X., Zheng, Y., Chen, R., Qiu, S., Chen, Z., Rao, W., Chen, S., You, Y., Lü, J., Xu, L. & Guan, X. (2019). Cryst. Growth Des. 19, 2455–2460.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationPaul, R. & Bora, S. J. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, o799–o800.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationTrollip, D. B., Barton, B., Caira, M. R. & Hosten, E. C. (2025). CrystEngComm 27, 7884–7901.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationYamada, S., Sako, N., Okuda, M. & Hozumi, A. (2013). Cryst­EngComm 15, 199–205.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds