research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

A lanthanum complex with 3,4,5,6-tetra­bromophthalate as ligand

crossmark logo

aUniv Rennes, INSA Rennes, CNRS UMR 6226 "Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes", 35708 Rennes, France, bUniv Rennes, CNRS UMR 6226, "Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes", 35042 Rennes, France, and cInstitut Universitaire de France, 1 rue Descartes, 75005 Paris, France
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by F. F. Ferreira, Universidade Federal do ABC, Brazil (Received 19 June 2026; accepted 12 August 2026; online 28 August 2026)

A lanthanum-based complex, heptaaqua(3,4,5,6-tetrabromobenzene-1,2-dicarboxylato)(3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-2-carboxybenzoato)lanthanum(III), [La(C8Br4O4)(C8HBr4O4)(H2O)7] or [La(tbpa)(Htbpa)(H2O)7], where H2tbpa is 3,4,5,6-tetra­bromo­phthalic acid, was prepared by microwave-assisted reaction between lanthanum chloride and 3,4,5,6-tetra­bromo­benzene-1,2-di­carb­oxy­lic or tetra­bromo­phthalic acid in water. The La3+ is nine-coordinated by seven oxygen atoms from coordinated water mol­ecules and two oxygen atoms from two different ligands in a slightly distorted D3h spherical tricapped trigonal prismatic geometry. The crystal packing features a hydrogen-bonding network and Br⋯Br inter­actions.

1. Chemical context

Tracking materials throughout their life cycle and across the supply chain is a major challenge, whether it is to combat counterfeiting or to accurately identify the nature of a mat­erial to ensure its correct recycling. Lanthanide coordination polymers have proved effective for marking materials in bulk as part of anti-counterfeiting efforts. They could also be relevant for marking plastics in bulk and so enable rigorous waste sorting. (Daiguebonne et al., 2025View full citation). Indeed, regardless of the recycling method (mechanical, chemical, or biochemical), the uniformity of waste batches is a key factor (Vollmer et al., 2020View full citation). While identification in the laboratory is relevant in the anti-counterfeiting field, it must be realized on sorting lines during the recycling process. This latter technological field is thus much more demanding than the former and requires highly efficient and easily identifiable markers. The quest for highly luminescent coordination compounds usable for marking plastics therefore remains an ongoing challenge. Our group has been conducting most of its research in this field for about 20 years. These works have shown that lanthanide coordination polymers based on halogeno phthalate ligands are very promising. Indeed, these non-toxic and inexpensive compounds can be prepared in high yields in water. The energies of their first excited triplet and singlet states are suitable (Latva et al., 1997View full citation; Steemers et al., 1995View full citation) for ensuring effective `antenna effects' (Weissman et al., 1942View full citation). Additionally, their adjacent carboxyl­ate functions, which allow for rigid mol­ecular motifs and prevent the presence of water mol­ecules in the first coordination sphere of lanthanide ions, are known for being beneficial to strong luminescence (Bünzli et al., 2010View full citation, 2015View full citation). Finally, halogen substituents, by establishing halogen⋯halogen inter­actions, contribute to keeping the mol­ecular motifs spaced apart and avoiding ππ inter­actions.

Surprisingly, studies devoted to lanthanide coordination polymers based on phthalate or halogeno phthalate are fairly rare, and those devoted to the study of their luminescent properties are even rarer (Hénaff et al., 2026View full citation). To the best of our knowledge, only lanthanide coordination polymers based on di­chloro­phthalate or tetra­chloro­phthalate ligands have been studied in terms of their luminescent properties (Badiane et al., 2018View full citation; Blais et al., 2025View full citation, 2026View full citation; Ngom, Chang et al., 2024View full citation). The studies revealed that these compounds exhibit excellent luminescence properties (Blais et al., 2022View full citation). However, the number, the nature and the position on the phenyl ring of the halogen atoms have clearly a strong influence on the luminescent properties of the compounds. Indeed, they influence the energies of the first excited triplet and singlet states (Clark et al., 1963View full citation), the strength of the halogen⋯halogen inter­actions (Fourmigué, 2009View full citation; Metrangolo, 2001View full citation; Cavallo et al., 2016View full citation) and the steric hindrance of the ligand (Daiguebonne et al., 2000View full citation). For these reasons, we undertook a systematic study of rare-earth coordination compounds based on halogeno-phthalate ligands. It was during this study that the complex [La(tbpa)(Htbpa)(H2O)7] was obtained. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first structurally characterized lanthanide coordination compound based on 3,4,5,6-tetra­bromo­phthalate (Fig. 1[link]) as ligand.

[Scheme 1]
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Schematic representation of 3,4,5,6-tetra­bromobenzene-1,2-di­carb­oxy­lic or tetra­bromo­phthalic acid (H2tbpa).

2. Structural commentary

Microwave-assisted reaction in water between lanthanum chloride and 3,4,5,6-tetra­bromo-benzene-1,2-di­carb­oxy­lic or tetra­bromo­phthalic acid (hereafter denoted H2tbpa) leads to a lanthanum complex with chemical formula [La(tbpa)(Htbpa)(H2O)7] (Fig. 2[link]). There is one independent La3+ ion in this crystal structure. It is nine-coordinated by seven oxygen atoms from coordination water mol­ecules and two oxygen atoms from two different ligands that form a slightly distorted D3h spherical tricapped trigonal prism (see table in the supporting information) (Casanova et al., 2005View full citation; Alvarez et al., 2005View full citation). There are also two independent ligands in this crystal structure. One is fully deprotonated (type A) while the other one is singly protonated (type B). Both are μ1(η1) (Fig. 3[link]). The high hydration rate of the lanthanide ion results from the bulky character of the ligand, which prevents it from saturating the coordination sphere of the lanthanum ion. Consequently, there are seven coordinated water mol­ecules per lanthanide ion (Daiguebonne et al., 2000View full citation; Xi-Zhang et al., 1987View full citation). It is noticeable that there are no water mol­ecules of crystallization in this crystal structure.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Projection view of the asymmetric unit of [La(tbpa)(Htbpa)(H2O)7] with the numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Schematic representations of the neighbourhood of the La3+ ion in [La(tbpa)(Htbpa)(H2O)7] (left) and of the bulky character of the tbpa2− ligand (right). The dotted line highlights the steric hindrance of the ligand.

3. Supra­molecular features

The cohesion of the crystal packing is ensured by a hydrogen-bonding network (Table 1[link]) and Br⋯Br inter­actions (Table 2[link]). There are no π-π inter­actions in the crystal (shortest centroid–centroid distances are about 6.3 Å). As shown in Fig. 4[link], the bromine atoms face each other and Br⋯Br inter­actions keep the complexes far apart from one another in the c-axis direction. There are eight lanthanide ions closer than 10 Å, the distance above which inter­metallic energy transfers are expected to be less efficient (Imbert et al., 2003View full citation) from a given lanthanide ion (Table 3[link] and Fig. 5[link]). In the c-axis direction the shortest distances between closest lanthanide ions are all greater than 17 Å. In conclusion, the tbpa2− ligand appears effective, thanks to the Br⋯Br inter­actions, at keeping the mol­ecular motifs apart from one another. This is an advantage and helps to minimize inter­metallic energy transfers. On the other hand, the steric hindrance caused by the bromine atoms is too great to allow the ligands to saturate the lanthanide ion's coordination sphere. This results in a high number of coordinated water mol­ecules and, consequently, a high number of high-energy O—H vibrators in the vicinity of the rare earth, which is known for being detrimental to luminescence. To date, despite great synthetic efforts, we have not succeeded in preparing an isostructural compound with a luminescent rare-earth ion. It is thus not possible to experimentally evaluate the potential of this ligand for the preparation of highly luminescent compounds.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2A⋯O13 0.85 (1) 2.25 (1) 3.093 (6) 175 (6)
O2—H2B⋯O13v 0.85 (1) 2.44 (5) 3.026 (6) 126 (5)
O2—H2B⋯O14v 0.85 (1) 1.89 (1) 2.729 (6) 170 (5)
O3—H3A⋯O13vi 0.85 (1) 1.88 (2) 2.701 (6) 163 (6)
O3—H3B⋯O12vii 0.85 (1) 1.91 (2) 2.700 (6) 154 (5)
O4—H4A⋯O9viii 0.85 (1) 2.00 (2) 2.794 (5) 155 (5)
O4—H4B⋯O12vii 0.85 (1) 1.99 (2) 2.803 (5) 162 (5)
O5—H5A⋯O7vi 0.85 (1) 2.06 (2) 2.881 (6) 161 (5)
O5—H5B⋯O11viii 0.85 (1) 2.26 (4) 2.990 (6) 144 (5)
O6—H6A⋯O5viii 0.85 (1) 2.01 (2) 2.830 (6) 163 (5)
O6—H6B⋯O9viii 0.85 (1) 1.78 (1) 2.619 (6) 173 (7)
O7—H7A⋯O15ix 0.85 (1) 2.07 (3) 2.835 (6) 149 (6)
O7—H7B⋯O11 0.85 (1) 1.97 (2) 2.806 (6) 166 (5)
O10—H10⋯O14x 0.84 1.79 2.577 (6) 155
O15—H15B⋯O13vi 0.85 (1) 1.84 (2) 2.661 (5) 165 (5)
Symmetry codes: (v) Mathematical equation; (vi) Mathematical equation; (vii) Mathematical equation; (viii) Mathematical equation; (ix) Mathematical equation; (x) Mathematical equation.

Table 2
Selected interatomic distances (Å)

Br1⋯Br2 3.2865 (8) Br3⋯Br3iii 3.7378 (8)
Br1⋯Br8i 3.6115 (8) Br4⋯Br5 3.5336 (7)
Br2⋯Br3 3.2929 (9) Br5⋯Br6 3.2936 (9)
Br2⋯Br7ii 3.5480 (9) Br6⋯Br7 3.2977 (10)
Br2⋯Br3ii 3.5688 (9) Br7⋯Br8 3.2717 (9)
Br3⋯Br4 3.2808 (8) Br7⋯Br8iv 3.7295 (11)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation.

Table 3
Inter­metallic distances (Å) shorter than 10Å

Atom 1 Atom 2 Symmetry Distance
La1 La1 1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z 6.1455 (4)
  La1 1 + x, y, z 6.2336 (4)
  La1 −1 + x, y, z 6.2336 (4)
  La1 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z 6.8083 (4)
  La1 2 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z 8.3989 (4)
  La1 x, 2 − y, 1 − z 9.0945 (4)
  La1 2 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z 9.1469 (4)
  La1 x, 1 − y, 1 − z 9.3142 (4)
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Projection views along the a- (left) and b-axis (right) of the crystal packing of [La(tbpa)(Htbpa)(H2O)7]. Dotted lines represent the shortest Br⋯Br distances.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Perspective view along the a axis of [La(tbpa)(Htbpa)(H2O)7]. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. The shortest inter­metallic distances along the a, b and c axes are indicated.

4. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database was performed using ConQuest (Version 2026, CSD version 6.01, updated November 2025; Groom et al., 2016View full citation). For lanthanide coordination polymers based on the tetra­chloro­phthalate ligand, see: CSD refcodes GADCOG (Chen et al., 2016View full citation), TANDUK (Ma et al., 2017View full citation), XOYJII (Ngom, Chang et al., 2024View full citation), MUFMOT (Ngom, Blais et al., 2024View full citation) and QUWSIO (Blais et al., 2025View full citation). For a structural comparison between the crystal structures of phthalate and halogeno phthalate-based coordination polymers, see Hénaff et al. (2026View full citation).

5. Synthesis and crystallization

Lanthanum oxide (4 N) was purchased from Ampère. Hydrated lanthanum chloride [LaCl3(H2O)6] was prepared according to established procedures (Desreux, 1989View full citation). 3,4,5,6-Tetra­bromo­phthalic acid (H2tbpa) (98.75%) was purchased from BDLpharm and used without further purification. 0.4 mmol (148.5 mg) of LaCl3(H2O)6, 0.6 mmol (278.2 mg) of H2tbpa, 1.2 mL of a solution of sodium hydroxide (1 mol L−1) and 3.8 mL of deionized water were placed in a 10 mL sealed Pyrex test tube in a CEM Discover microwave oven and maintained for 30 min under stirring (T = 403 K; P = 2.5 bar). Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained after slow evaporation of the supernatant solution extracted after the synthesis.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4[link]. The H atoms of the water mol­ecules were located and refined using a mixed model with the AFIX 2 instruction. DFIX [O—H = 0.85 (1) Å] and DANG [H⋯H = 1.37 (1) Å] restraints were applied. The hydroxyl H atom was refined using AFIX 147. The isotropic displacement parameters for all O-bound H atoms were Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(O).

Table 4
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula [La(C8Br4O4)(C8HBr4O4)(H2O)7]
Mr 1225.47
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, PMathematical equation
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 6.2336 (6), 12.3400 (11), 19.1394 (19)
α, β, γ (°) 96.248 (4), 90.990 (4), 91.691 (4)
V3) 1462.6 (2)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 12.46
Crystal size (mm) 0.54 × 0.13 × 0.07
 
Data collection
Diffractometer D8 VENTURE Bruker AXS
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.245, 0.418
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 15668, 5917, 5164
Rint 0.038
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.625
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.035, 0.115, 1.06
No. of reflections 5917
No. of parameters 374
No. of restraints 21
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 1.71, −1.46
Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2015View full citation), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2019/2 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation), SXGRAPH (Farrugia, 1999View full citation), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020View full citation) and CRYSCALC (T. Roisnel, local program, 2024).

Supporting information


Computing details top

Heptaaqua(3,4,5,6-tetrabromobenzene-1,2-dicarboxylato)(3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-2-carboxybenzoato)lanthanum(III), top
Crystal data top
[La(C8Br4O4)(C8HBr4O4)(H2O)7]Z = 2
Mr = 1225.47F(000) = 1136
Triclinic, P1Dx = 2.783 Mg m3
a = 6.2336 (6) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 12.3400 (11) ÅCell parameters from 9977 reflections
c = 19.1394 (19) Åθ = 2.6–27.5°
α = 96.248 (4)°µ = 12.46 mm1
β = 90.990 (4)°T = 150 K
γ = 91.691 (4)°Board, colourless
V = 1462.6 (2) Å30.54 × 0.13 × 0.07 mm
Data collection top
D8 VENTURE Bruker AXS
diffractometer
5917 independent reflections
Radiation source: Incoatec microfocus sealed tube5164 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Multilayer monochromatorRint = 0.038
Detector resolution: 7.39 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.6°
rotation images scansh = 77
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
k = 1515
Tmin = 0.245, Tmax = 0.418l = 2323
15668 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.115 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0767P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
5917 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.71 e Å3
374 parametersΔρmin = 1.46 e Å3
21 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Crystal structure was solved by dual-space algorithm using SHELXT program (Sheldrick, 2015) and then refined with full-matrix least-squares methods based on F2 (SHELXL). All non-Hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic atomic displacement parameters. The final refinement on F2 with 6584 unique intensities and 320 parameters converged at ωRF2=0.1096 (RF=0.0349) for 5164 observed reflections with I>2σ(I). In the CHECKCIF procedure, no A-type meaningful alert has remained Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
La10.52218 (5)0.75582 (2)0.44897 (2)0.00807 (11)
Br11.30712 (9)0.29275 (4)0.23795 (3)0.01532 (15)
Br21.15318 (10)0.33774 (5)0.07884 (3)0.02007 (16)
Br30.74303 (11)0.49409 (5)0.05785 (3)0.02421 (17)
Br40.46824 (9)0.58920 (5)0.19457 (3)0.01814 (15)
Br50.10228 (9)0.80306 (4)0.21605 (3)0.01595 (15)
Br60.29127 (11)0.77604 (5)0.05568 (4)0.02413 (17)
Br70.73350 (11)0.91220 (5)0.02153 (4)0.02452 (17)
Br80.97681 (10)1.07518 (5)0.14639 (4)0.02193 (16)
O10.6451 (6)0.6247 (3)0.3526 (2)0.0142 (9)
O20.8468 (6)0.6624 (3)0.4899 (2)0.0143 (8)
H2A0.914 (8)0.616 (4)0.463 (2)0.017*
H2B0.907 (9)0.666 (5)0.5306 (13)0.017*
O30.3388 (7)0.5916 (3)0.4919 (2)0.0123 (8)
H3A0.273 (9)0.547 (4)0.4612 (19)0.015*
H3B0.326 (10)0.567 (4)0.5313 (13)0.015*
O40.5210 (6)0.7546 (3)0.5858 (2)0.0131 (8)
H4A0.572 (10)0.804 (3)0.617 (2)0.016*
H4B0.512 (10)0.696 (2)0.605 (3)0.016*
O50.1924 (6)0.8589 (3)0.5052 (2)0.0142 (8)
H5A0.078 (5)0.853 (5)0.480 (2)0.017*
H5B0.157 (8)0.861 (5)0.5478 (9)0.017*
O60.6957 (7)0.9232 (3)0.5158 (2)0.0153 (9)
H6A0.721 (11)0.985 (2)0.501 (3)0.018*
H6B0.678 (11)0.934 (4)0.5597 (8)0.018*
O70.8708 (6)0.8335 (3)0.3942 (2)0.0150 (9)
H7A0.950 (9)0.790 (3)0.370 (3)0.018*
H7B0.864 (10)0.891 (3)0.373 (3)0.018*
O80.4134 (6)0.8735 (3)0.3598 (2)0.0159 (9)
O90.3261 (6)1.0449 (3)0.3470 (2)0.0151 (9)
O100.7734 (7)1.1778 (3)0.2832 (2)0.0168 (9)
H100.8138521.2156810.3204900.025*
O110.8232 (6)1.0385 (3)0.3462 (2)0.0147 (9)
O120.5791 (6)0.4533 (3)0.3754 (2)0.0139 (8)
O131.0695 (6)0.4820 (3)0.3952 (2)0.0155 (9)
O140.9943 (6)0.3045 (3)0.3754 (2)0.0126 (8)
O150.1948 (6)0.6794 (3)0.3651 (2)0.0130 (8)
H15A0.240 (10)0.686 (4)0.3243 (14)0.016*
H15B0.157 (10)0.6131 (16)0.367 (3)0.016*
C11.0096 (8)0.3987 (4)0.3559 (3)0.0092 (11)
C20.9454 (9)0.4158 (4)0.2816 (3)0.0092 (11)
C31.0610 (9)0.3744 (4)0.2242 (3)0.0113 (11)
C41.0005 (9)0.3963 (4)0.1576 (3)0.0144 (12)
C50.8214 (9)0.4612 (4)0.1480 (3)0.0129 (11)
C60.7098 (9)0.5039 (4)0.2058 (3)0.0126 (11)
C70.7696 (9)0.4808 (4)0.2736 (3)0.0101 (11)
C80.6519 (8)0.5225 (4)0.3394 (3)0.0121 (12)
C90.3958 (8)0.9535 (4)0.3245 (3)0.0106 (11)
C100.4690 (9)0.9412 (4)0.2493 (3)0.0125 (5)
C110.3619 (9)0.8763 (4)0.1949 (3)0.0125 (5)
C120.4355 (9)0.8674 (4)0.1269 (3)0.0125 (5)
C130.6226 (9)0.9271 (4)0.1119 (3)0.0125 (5)
C140.7255 (9)0.9954 (4)0.1665 (3)0.0125 (5)
C150.6521 (9)1.0039 (4)0.2334 (3)0.0125 (5)
C160.7609 (9)1.0747 (4)0.2941 (3)0.0109 (11)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
La10.00835 (17)0.00649 (15)0.00928 (19)0.00016 (11)0.00035 (12)0.00048 (12)
Br10.0131 (3)0.0155 (3)0.0173 (3)0.0043 (2)0.0011 (2)0.0000 (2)
Br20.0261 (3)0.0211 (3)0.0133 (3)0.0064 (2)0.0075 (3)0.0005 (2)
Br30.0308 (4)0.0331 (3)0.0101 (3)0.0107 (3)0.0012 (3)0.0059 (3)
Br40.0195 (3)0.0194 (3)0.0163 (3)0.0087 (2)0.0011 (2)0.0034 (2)
Br50.0141 (3)0.0150 (3)0.0184 (3)0.0033 (2)0.0028 (2)0.0019 (2)
Br60.0313 (4)0.0246 (3)0.0142 (4)0.0064 (3)0.0047 (3)0.0048 (3)
Br70.0298 (4)0.0292 (3)0.0137 (4)0.0022 (3)0.0072 (3)0.0026 (3)
Br80.0239 (3)0.0205 (3)0.0208 (4)0.0069 (2)0.0097 (3)0.0003 (3)
O10.016 (2)0.0081 (17)0.017 (2)0.0038 (14)0.0007 (17)0.0057 (16)
O20.017 (2)0.022 (2)0.005 (2)0.0062 (16)0.0017 (17)0.0027 (17)
O30.020 (2)0.0102 (18)0.007 (2)0.0027 (15)0.0005 (17)0.0023 (15)
O40.019 (2)0.0090 (17)0.010 (2)0.0020 (15)0.0033 (17)0.0009 (16)
O50.0106 (19)0.0183 (19)0.013 (2)0.0006 (15)0.0032 (17)0.0013 (17)
O60.026 (2)0.0124 (18)0.008 (2)0.0021 (16)0.0027 (19)0.0013 (16)
O70.016 (2)0.0130 (18)0.016 (2)0.0015 (15)0.0042 (18)0.0014 (17)
O80.016 (2)0.0117 (18)0.021 (3)0.0002 (15)0.0028 (18)0.0059 (17)
O90.019 (2)0.0115 (18)0.014 (2)0.0028 (15)0.0015 (18)0.0006 (16)
O100.022 (2)0.0092 (18)0.018 (3)0.0025 (15)0.0006 (19)0.0005 (17)
O110.017 (2)0.0141 (19)0.012 (2)0.0035 (15)0.0027 (17)0.0025 (17)
O120.018 (2)0.0140 (18)0.010 (2)0.0020 (15)0.0005 (17)0.0030 (16)
O130.017 (2)0.0088 (18)0.020 (3)0.0020 (15)0.0025 (18)0.0017 (16)
O140.017 (2)0.0088 (17)0.012 (2)0.0020 (14)0.0022 (17)0.0021 (15)
O150.015 (2)0.0085 (17)0.014 (2)0.0040 (14)0.0011 (17)0.0018 (16)
C10.006 (2)0.015 (3)0.006 (3)0.0026 (19)0.002 (2)0.003 (2)
C20.015 (3)0.007 (2)0.005 (3)0.0017 (19)0.001 (2)0.002 (2)
C30.013 (3)0.008 (2)0.013 (3)0.0002 (19)0.001 (2)0.003 (2)
C40.015 (3)0.008 (2)0.019 (3)0.000 (2)0.007 (2)0.003 (2)
C50.021 (3)0.015 (3)0.004 (3)0.003 (2)0.000 (2)0.003 (2)
C60.014 (3)0.011 (2)0.012 (3)0.001 (2)0.003 (2)0.002 (2)
C70.013 (3)0.005 (2)0.012 (3)0.0003 (18)0.004 (2)0.002 (2)
C80.008 (2)0.010 (2)0.018 (3)0.0012 (19)0.003 (2)0.000 (2)
C90.010 (3)0.010 (2)0.011 (3)0.0023 (19)0.004 (2)0.001 (2)
C100.0159 (11)0.0098 (10)0.0117 (14)0.0017 (9)0.0009 (9)0.0012 (9)
C110.0159 (11)0.0098 (10)0.0117 (14)0.0017 (9)0.0009 (9)0.0012 (9)
C120.0159 (11)0.0098 (10)0.0117 (14)0.0017 (9)0.0009 (9)0.0012 (9)
C130.0159 (11)0.0098 (10)0.0117 (14)0.0017 (9)0.0009 (9)0.0012 (9)
C140.0159 (11)0.0098 (10)0.0117 (14)0.0017 (9)0.0009 (9)0.0012 (9)
C150.0159 (11)0.0098 (10)0.0117 (14)0.0017 (9)0.0009 (9)0.0012 (9)
C160.014 (3)0.013 (2)0.005 (3)0.001 (2)0.007 (2)0.001 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
La1—O82.457 (4)O7—H7A0.851 (10)
La1—O12.466 (4)O7—H7B0.853 (10)
La1—O22.513 (4)O8—C91.262 (7)
La1—O62.514 (4)O9—C91.256 (7)
La1—O32.519 (4)O10—C161.312 (6)
La1—O42.621 (4)O10—H100.8400
La1—O72.629 (4)O11—C161.199 (7)
La1—O52.633 (4)O12—C81.236 (7)
La1—O152.660 (4)O13—C11.249 (7)
Br1—C31.890 (5)O14—C11.261 (7)
Br2—C41.886 (6)O15—H15A0.846 (10)
Br3—C51.876 (6)O15—H15B0.847 (10)
Br4—C61.885 (6)C1—C21.509 (8)
Br5—C111.901 (6)C2—C31.384 (8)
Br6—C121.871 (6)C2—C71.393 (7)
Br7—C131.866 (6)C3—C41.379 (9)
Br8—C141.893 (6)C4—C51.414 (8)
O1—C81.261 (6)C5—C61.380 (9)
O2—H2A0.850 (10)C6—C71.404 (8)
O2—H2B0.853 (10)C7—C81.518 (8)
O3—H3A0.849 (10)C9—C101.510 (8)
O3—H3B0.848 (10)C10—C111.392 (8)
O4—H4A0.851 (10)C10—C151.416 (8)
O4—H4B0.848 (10)C11—C121.382 (9)
O5—H5A0.851 (10)C12—C131.411 (8)
O5—H5B0.848 (10)C13—C141.403 (8)
O6—H6A0.849 (10)C14—C151.361 (9)
O6—H6B0.847 (10)C15—C161.513 (8)
Br1···Br23.2865 (8)Br3···Br3iii3.7378 (8)
Br1···Br8i3.6115 (8)Br4···Br53.5336 (7)
Br2···Br33.2929 (9)Br5···Br63.2936 (9)
Br2···Br7ii3.5480 (9)Br6···Br73.2977 (10)
Br2···Br3ii3.5688 (9)Br7···Br83.2717 (9)
Br3···Br43.2808 (8)Br7···Br8iv3.7295 (11)
O8—La1—O188.06 (14)H7A—O7—H7B106.7 (17)
O8—La1—O2140.46 (13)C9—O8—La1163.0 (4)
O1—La1—O270.66 (14)C16—O10—H10109.5
O8—La1—O687.13 (14)La1—O15—H15A104 (4)
O1—La1—O6132.78 (13)La1—O15—H15B116 (4)
O2—La1—O684.11 (14)H15A—O15—H15B107.9 (17)
O8—La1—O3131.38 (14)O13—C1—O14124.1 (5)
O1—La1—O384.75 (13)O13—C1—C2116.3 (5)
O2—La1—O380.80 (14)O14—C1—C2119.6 (5)
O6—La1—O3130.72 (14)C3—C2—C7121.1 (5)
O8—La1—O4139.16 (13)C3—C2—C1122.2 (5)
O1—La1—O4132.78 (13)C7—C2—C1116.7 (5)
O2—La1—O469.60 (13)C4—C3—C2119.8 (5)
O6—La1—O466.05 (13)C4—C3—Br1120.5 (4)
O3—La1—O464.70 (13)C2—C3—Br1119.7 (5)
O8—La1—O771.72 (13)C3—C4—C5120.2 (5)
O1—La1—O769.98 (13)C3—C4—Br2120.2 (4)
O2—La1—O769.80 (13)C5—C4—Br2119.7 (5)
O6—La1—O763.94 (13)C6—C5—C4119.5 (6)
O3—La1—O7146.03 (13)C6—C5—Br3120.2 (5)
O4—La1—O7117.16 (13)C4—C5—Br3120.2 (4)
O8—La1—O576.26 (14)C5—C6—C7120.4 (5)
O1—La1—O5145.94 (13)C5—C6—Br4120.5 (5)
O2—La1—O5137.90 (14)C7—C6—Br4119.0 (4)
O6—La1—O577.17 (13)C2—C7—C6119.0 (5)
O3—La1—O583.49 (13)C2—C7—C8117.5 (5)
O4—La1—O568.36 (13)C6—C7—C8123.5 (5)
O7—La1—O5129.93 (12)O12—C8—O1126.9 (6)
O8—La1—O1564.43 (13)O12—C8—C7116.9 (5)
O1—La1—O1569.18 (13)O1—C8—C7116.1 (5)
O2—La1—O15130.61 (13)O9—C9—O8125.4 (6)
O6—La1—O15145.15 (13)O9—C9—C10116.2 (5)
O3—La1—O1568.11 (13)O8—C9—C10118.4 (5)
O4—La1—O15123.20 (13)C11—C10—C15118.6 (6)
O7—La1—O15119.62 (13)C11—C10—C9123.9 (5)
O5—La1—O1576.78 (13)C15—C10—C9117.4 (5)
C8—O1—La1137.1 (4)C12—C11—C10121.8 (5)
La1—O2—H2A123 (4)C12—C11—Br5120.3 (4)
La1—O2—H2B130 (4)C10—C11—Br5117.8 (5)
H2A—O2—H2B107.0 (17)C11—C12—C13119.2 (5)
La1—O3—H3A117 (3)C11—C12—Br6120.5 (4)
La1—O3—H3B136 (3)C13—C12—Br6120.3 (5)
H3A—O3—H3B107.7 (17)C14—C13—C12118.7 (6)
La1—O4—H4A127 (4)C14—C13—Br7121.0 (4)
La1—O4—H4B122 (4)C12—C13—Br7120.3 (4)
H4A—O4—H4B107.4 (17)C15—C14—C13121.8 (5)
La1—O5—H5A115 (4)C15—C14—Br8119.5 (4)
La1—O5—H5B125 (4)C13—C14—Br8118.7 (4)
H5A—O5—H5B107.5 (17)C14—C15—C10119.8 (5)
La1—O6—H6A127 (4)C14—C15—C16123.5 (5)
La1—O6—H6B119 (4)C10—C15—C16116.7 (5)
H6A—O6—H6B107.8 (17)O11—C16—O10125.2 (5)
La1—O7—H7A119 (4)O11—C16—C15122.4 (5)
La1—O7—H7B119 (4)O10—C16—C15112.4 (5)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y1, z; (ii) x+2, y+1, z; (iii) x+1, y+1, z; (iv) x+2, y+2, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2A···O130.85 (1)2.25 (1)3.093 (6)175 (6)
O2—H2B···O13v0.85 (1)2.44 (5)3.026 (6)126 (5)
O2—H2B···O14v0.85 (1)1.89 (1)2.729 (6)170 (5)
O3—H3A···O13vi0.85 (1)1.88 (2)2.701 (6)163 (6)
O3—H3B···O12vii0.85 (1)1.91 (2)2.700 (6)154 (5)
O4—H4A···O9viii0.85 (1)2.00 (2)2.794 (5)155 (5)
O4—H4B···O12vii0.85 (1)1.99 (2)2.803 (5)162 (5)
O5—H5A···O7vi0.85 (1)2.06 (2)2.881 (6)161 (5)
O5—H5B···O11viii0.85 (1)2.26 (4)2.990 (6)144 (5)
O6—H6A···O5viii0.85 (1)2.01 (2)2.830 (6)163 (5)
O6—H6B···O9viii0.85 (1)1.78 (1)2.619 (6)173 (7)
O7—H7A···O15ix0.85 (1)2.07 (3)2.835 (6)149 (6)
O7—H7B···O110.85 (1)1.97 (2)2.806 (6)166 (5)
O10—H10···O14x0.841.792.577 (6)155
O15—H15B···O13vi0.85 (1)1.84 (2)2.661 (5)165 (5)
Symmetry codes: (v) x+2, y+1, z+1; (vi) x1, y, z; (vii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (viii) x+1, y+2, z+1; (ix) x+1, y, z; (x) x, y+1, z.
Intermetallic distances (Å) shorter than 10Å top
Atom 1Atom 2SymmetryDistance
La1La11-x, 2-y, 1-y6.1455 (4)
La11+x, y, z6.2336 (4)
La1-1+x, y, z6.2336 (4)
La11-x, 1-y, 1-z6.8083 (4)
La12-x, 2-y, 1-z8.3989 (4)
La1-x, 2-y, 1-z9.0945 (4)
La12-x, 1-y, 1-z9.1469 (4)
La1-x, 1-y, 1-z9.3142 (4)
Continuous Shape Measurements (CShM) for La(tbpa)(Htbpa)(H2O)7. The lower is the CShM value, the better is the agreement with the given coordination polyhedron top
[ML9]EP-9OPY-9HBPY-9JTC-9JCCU-9CCU-9JCSAPR-9TCTPR-9JTDIC-9HH-9MFF-9
La33.00324.17518.55114.9808.2897.0911.7681.26213.3429.3941.742
EP-9 D9h-Enneagon; OPY-9 C8v-Octagonal pyramid; HBPY-9 D7h-Heptagonal bipyramid; JTC-9 C3v-Johnson triangular cupola J3; JCCU-9 C4v-Capped cube J8; CCU-9 C4v-Spherical-relaxed capped cube; JCSAPR-9 C4v-Capped square antiprism J10; CSAPR-9 C4v-Spherical capped square antiprism; JTCTPR-9 D3h-Tricapped trigonal prism J51; TCTPR-9 D3h-Spherical tricapped trigonal prism; JTDIC-9 C3v-Tridiminished icosahedron J63; HH-9 C2v-Hula-hoop; MFF-9 Cs-Muffin.

Acknowledgements

The CDifX (Centre de Diffractométrie X) of ISCR is acknowledged for the X-ray diffraction data collection.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Région Bretagne (grant No. ARED-COH24014).

References

Return to citationAlvarez, S., Alemany, P., Casanova, D., Cirera, J., Llunell, M. & Avnir, D. (2005). Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 1693–1708.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBadiane, A. M., Freslon, S., Daiguebonne, C., Suffren, Y., Bernot, K., Calvez, G., Costuas, K., Camara, M. & Guillou, O. (2018). Inorg. Chem. 57, 3399–3410.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBlais, C., Calvez, G., Suffren, Y., Daiguebonne, C., Paranthoen, C., Bazin, E., Freslon, S., Bernot, K. & Guillou, O. (2022). Inorg. Chem. 61, 19588–19596.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBlais, C., Chang, A., Hénaff, C., Daiguebonne, C., Yao, A., Gautier, R., Calvez, G., Suffren, Y., Bernot, K. & Guillou, O. (2026). Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers. In the press. https://doi.org/10.1039/d5qi02306h  Google Scholar
Return to citationBlais, C., Chang, A., Ngom, F., Daiguebonne, C., Suffren, Y., Yao, A., Gautier, R., Camara, M., Calvez, G., Bernot, K. & Guillou, O. (2025). Inorg. Chem. 64, 10194–10207.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2015). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBünzli, J. G. (2015). Coord. Chem. Rev. 293–294, 19–47.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBünzli, J.-C. G. & Eliseeva, S. V. (2010). Lanthanide Luminescence edited by P. Hänninen & H. Härmä, pp. 1–45. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.  Google Scholar
Return to citationCasanova, D., Llunell, M., Alemany, P. & Alvarez, S. (2005). Chem. Eur. J. 11, 1479–1494.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationCavallo, G., Metrangolo, P., Milani, R., Pilati, T., Priimagi, A., Resnati, G. & Terraneo, G. (2016). Chem. Rev. 116, 2478–2601.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationChen, S.-C., Dai, A.-Q., Huang, K.-L., Zhang, Z.-H., Cui, A.-J., He, M.-Y. & Chen, Q. (2016). Dalton Trans. 45, 3577–3589.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationClark, D. T., Murrell, J. N. & Tedder, J. M. (1963). J. Chem. Soc. pp. 1250–1253.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationDaiguebonne, C., Blais, C., Bernot, K. & Guillou, O. (2025). Acc. Chem. Res. 58, 1801–1814.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationDaiguebonne, C., Guillou, O., Gérault, Y. & Boubekeur, K. (2000). In Recent Research Development in Inorganic Chemistry edited by S. G. Pandalai, pp. 165–183. Trivandrum: Transworld Research Network.  Google Scholar
Return to citationDesreux, J. F. (1989). Lanthanide Probes in Life, Chemical and Earth Sciences: Theory and Practice edited by G. R. Choppin & J.-C. G. Bünzli Netherlands: Elsevier.  Google Scholar
Return to citationFarrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationFourmigué, M. (2009). Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 13, 36–45.  Google Scholar
Return to citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHénaff, C., Blais, C., Chang, A., Bernot, K., Daiguebonne, C. & Guillou, O. (2026). J. Mol. Struct. 1349, 143600.  Google Scholar
Return to citationImbert, D., Cantuel, M., Bünzli, J. G., Bernardinelli, G. & Piguet, C. (2003). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 15698–15699.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationLatva, M., Takalo, H., Mukkala, V.-M., Matachescu, C., Rodríguez-Ubis, J. C. & Kankare, J. (1997). J. Lumin. 75, 149–169.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationMa, F.-X., Zhao, D. & Zhang, R.-J. (2017). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 232, 165–166.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMacrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226–235.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMetrangolo, P. & Resnati, G. (2001). Chem. Eur. J. 7, 2511–2519.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationNgom, F., Blais, C., Badiane, I., Hénaff, C., Camara, M., Daiguebonne, C. & Guillou, O. (2024). CrystEngComm 27, 210–225.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationNgom, F., Chang, A., Blais, C., Daiguebonne, C., Suffren, Y., Camara, M., Calvez, G., Bernot, K. & Guillou, O. (2024). Inorg. Chem. 63, 13048–13058.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSteemers, F. J., Verboom, W., Reinhoudt, D. N., van der Tol, E. B. & Verhoeven, J. W. (1995). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 9408–9414.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationVollmer, I., Jenks, M. J. F., Roelands, M. C. P., White, R. J., van Harmelen, T., de Wild, P., van der Laan, G. P., Meirer, F., Keurentjes, J. T. F. & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2020). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 15402–15423.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWeissman, S. I. (1942). J. Chem. Phys. 10, 214–217.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationXi-Zhang, F., Ao-Ling, G., Ying-Ting, X., Xing-Fu, L. & Peng-Nian, S. (1987). Polyhedron 6, 1041–1048.  Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890