research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Synthesis and crystal structure of the mixed-valent TeIV/VI compound PbTe3O8

crossmark logo

aInstitute for Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Division of Applied Solid State Chemistry, TU Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/E164-05-1, A-1060, Vienna, Austria
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by K. V. Domasevitch, National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, Ukraine (Received 6 October 2026; accepted 22 October 2026; online 30 October 2026)

The crystal structure of the mixed-valent compound PbTe3O8 (= PbIITeIV2TeVIO8), lead(II) bis­[oxidotellurate(IV)] tellurate(VI), is isotypic with that of SrTe3O8. It comprises 1∞[Te3O8]2– chains sharing O atoms to form a framework with two types of square channels extending parallel to [001]. The smaller channels (diameter ∼4 Å) are occupied by 12-coordinate PbII atoms in the centre of the channel, whereas the slightly larger channels (diameter ∼4.5 Å) accommodate the stereoactive 5s2 electron lone pair of TeIV.

1. Chemical context

In addition to the inter­est in the crystal-chemical peculiarities of compounds containing PbII and TeIV atoms that are characterized by their lone pair electrons (Walsh et al., 2011View full citation), phases in the Pb/Te/O system are also relevant in terms of application-related problems. This applies, for example, to PbTe-based thermoelectrics (Kanatzidis, 2010View full citation) or to Pb/Te/O-based high-refractive index glasses (Alazoumi et al., 2018View full citation), where they can occur as unwanted surfacial oxidation products and as (re)crystallized phases, respectively. It is therefore important to have a thorough knowledge of the formation conditions and crystal structures of such phases.

Taking lead(II) oxidotellurate(VI), PbTeO4, as an example, polycrystalline material from it was prepared at a temperature of 973 K and a pressure of 3000 atm (Sleight et al., 1972View full citation). In an attempt to grow PbTeO4 crystals under more moderate hydro­thermal conditions following a modified procedure reported by Mathers & Graham (1929View full citation), crystals of the so far unknown compound PbTe3O8 were obtained serendipitously, and its crystal structure is reported in the present communication. As it turned out, PbTeO4 can only be prepared at higher pressure and temperature conditions (Hladik et al., 2024View full citation).

2. Structural commentary

PbTe3O8 expands our knowledge of ternary phases in the Pb/Te/O system (all contain lead solely in oxidation state +II), of which the following are currently known. For oxidotellurates(IV): α-PbTeO3 (Mariolacos, 1969View full citation; Zavodnik et al., 2008View full citation; Missen et al., 2019bView full citation), β-PbTeO3 (Sciau et al., 1986View full citation; Ma et al., 2017View full citation; Weil et al., 2018View full citation), γ-PbTeO3 (Weil et al., 2018View full citation; Kampf et al., 2022View full citation), Pb2Te3O8 (Dewan et al., 1978View full citation; Champarnaud-Mesjard et al., 2001View full citation), PbTe5O11 (Oufkir et al., 2001View full citation); for oxidotellurates(VI): PbTeO4 (Hladik et al., 2024View full citation), Pb2TeO5 (Kampf et al., 2010View full citation; Artner & Weil, 2013View full citation), Pb5TeO8 (Artner & Weil, 2013View full citation). This makes PbTe3O8 the first mixed-valent TeIV/VI compound (= PbIITeIV2TeVIO8) in the ternary Pb/Te/O system. It belongs to class I of the Robin & Day (1967View full citation) classification, with the different valence states each clearly located on their own atomic sites.

The crystal structure of PbTe3O8 is isotypic with that of SrTe3O8 (Barrier et al., 2006View full citation; Weil & Stöger, 2007View full citation). It can be considered as being composed of ∞1[Te2IVTeVIO8]2– chains, with adjacent chains sharing O atoms to form a framework with two types of square channels extending parallel to [001] (Fig. 1[link]).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
View of the crystal structure of PbTe3O8 in a projection along [001]. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 90% probability level. Colour code: Pb green, O colourless, {Te1O5} square pyramid orange, {Te2O6} octa­hedron red; the 5s2 lone pair at the Te1 site is indicated as a blue sphere of arbitrary size.

The ∞1[Te2IVTeVIO8]2– chains consist of {Te12O8} double polyhedra, which are formed by two symmetry-related {Te1IVO5} pyramids (Te1, site symmetry m..), and of {Te2VIO6} octa­hedra (Te2, 2/m..) by sharing corners and edges (Fig. 2[link]). In the framework, each {Te2O6} octa­hedron is connected to four {Te12O8} double polyhedra, two via shared edges and two via shared corners, and each {Te12O8} double polyhedron is connected in the same way to four {Te2O6} octa­hedra. The {Te1O5} pyramid deviates somewhat from an ideal square-pyramidal coordination geometry (the τ5 index is 0.23, with extreme values of 0 for ideal square-pyramidal and 1 for ideal trigonal-bipyramidal geometry; Addison et al., 1984View full citation). The Te—O bond lengths span a range from 1.948 (10) to 2.170 (9) Å (Table 1[link]). The {Te2O6} octa­hedron shows no variance in bond lengths (Table 1[link]) and only minor angular distortions for the equatorial O atoms [range 85.2 (4)–94.8 (4)°]. All Te—O bond lengths are in characteristic ranges for tetra- and hexa­valent tellurium atoms (Christy et al., 2016View full citation). The LPLoc software (Hamani et al., 2020View full citation) revealed the position of the presumed 5s2 electron lone pair at the Te1IV site with resulting fractional coordinates of x = 0.49158, y = 0.35089, z = 0. The radius of the electron lone pair was calculated to be 1.03 Å with a distance of 1.027 Å from the Te1 position. The electron lone pair protrudes into the larger of the two channels (diameter ∼4.5 Å), and thus is stereochemically active, as shown in Fig. 1[link].

Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å)

Pb1—O2 2.570 (7) Te1—O1 2.080 (7)
Pb1—O3i 2.842 (8) Te1—O1iii 2.080 (7)
Pb1—O1 3.147 (8) Te1—O2 2.170 (9)
Te1—O3ii 1.948 (10) Te2—O1iv 1.927 (7)
Te1—O3 2.027 (9) Te2—O2 1.927 (9)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Part of a ∞1[Te2IVTeVIO8]2– chain. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 90% probability level. Symmetry codes refer to Table 1[link].

The PbII cation is located in the smaller channel (diameter ∼4 Å, Fig. 1[link]). It exhibits site symmetry Mathematical equation.. and has a coordination number of 12, with three groups of short, medium and long Pb—O bond lengths (Table 1[link]). The corresponding [PbO12] coordination polyhedron was analysed using the Polynator program (Link & Niewa, 2023View full citation). It has a volume of 52.82 Å3 and can be described as a distorted cubocta­hedron that differs from the ideal polyhedron (point group Mathematical equation2m) by a δ value (Link & Niewa, 2023View full citation) of 5.736. The average Pb[12]—O distance (2.853 Å) is in good agreement with the value of 2.827 (113) Å provided by Gagné & Hawthorne (2018View full citation). Localization of the electron lone pair at the PbII site using LPLoc shows that it is situated directly at the metal site (calculated lone pair radius 1.16 Å) and apparently exhibits no stereochemical activity.

A qu­anti­tative comparison between the isotypic MTe3O8 (M = Pb, Sr) structures was carried out using the compstru software (de la Flor et al., 2016View full citation), available at the Bilbao Crystallographic Server (Aroyo et al., 2006View full citation). The absolute distances between paired atoms are 0 Å for Pb1/Sr1, 0 Å for Te2, 0.0235 Å for Te1, 0.0247 Å for O3, 0.0252 Å for O1, and 0.0600 Å for O2; the arithmetic mean of the distance between paired atoms is 0.0264 Å. The degree of lattice distortion (0.0070), and the low value for the measure of similarity (0.024) indicate a high degree of simiularity for the two crystal structures.

In addition to the two isotypic MTe3O8 (M = Pb, Sr) structures, there is another compound with the same formula type (M = Ca) that occurs in nature as the rare mineral carlfriesite. Its monoclinic crystal structure (Effenberger et al., 1978View full citation; Missen et al., 2019aView full citation) can also be described as a nanoporous framework, although it exhibits a different topology for the [Te2IVTeVIO8]2– anion. Here, the metal cation is situated in slightly larger channels with a diameter of approximately 6 Å and exhibits a coordination number of eight with a distorted tetra­gonal anti­prismatic oxygen coordination.

3. Synthesis and crystallization

The chemicals were supplied by Merck and were used without further purification. Equimolar amounts of PbO2 and TeO2 (total load 0.3 g) were thoroughly mixed and placed in a Teflon container. The container was filled to about two-thirds of its inner volume (5 ml) with water, closed with a Teflon lid and placed in a steel autoclave, which was heated at 483 K for two days. The greyish solid product was filtered off and washed with water and ethanol. A few colourless crystals with a rod-like form of the title compound were isolated under a polarising microscope. Qualitative phase analysis of the bulk product from laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data revealed the starting materials TeO2 and PbO2 as well as PbTe3O8 as products, together with unassigned reflections. This shows that, in a redox reaction, parts of PbIV and TeIV have reacted to form PbII and TeVI.

4. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. For better comparison with isotypic SrTe3O8 (Weil & Stöger, 2007View full citation), the same atom numbering scheme and starting coordinates for refinement were used. The residual maximum and minimum difference-electron densities are located 0.61 Å from Te2 and 0.49 Å from Pb1, respectively.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula PbTe3O8
Mr 717.99
Crystal system, space group Tetragonal, P42/m
Temperature (K) 296
a, c (Å) 6.9345 (3), 6.7369 (4)
V (Å3) 323.96 (3)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 39.29
Crystal size (mm) 0.10 × 0.02 × 0.01
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.155, 0.349
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 7237, 514, 499
Rint 0.031
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) 0.702
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.037, 0.112, 1.12
No. of reflections 514
No. of parameters 34
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 3.82, −4.85
Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2018View full citation), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015View full citation), ATOMS (Dowty, 2006View full citation) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010View full citation).

Compared with the other atoms, the displacement parameters of the Pb site are large. The same phenomenon is observed in the isotypic Sr structure (Weil & Stöger, 2007View full citation). We assume that this property is characteristic of this type of structure and is primarily caused by the position of the metal site within the large pores. It is also possible that the Pb site shows positional order around the 4 axis or is under-occupied with a potential PbII/IV co-occupation, but this cannot be conclusively demonstrated by the available X-ray data. To obtain a more detailed picture, supplementary analytical data are required, for example through wet chemical methods or microprobe analysis.

Supporting information


Computing details top

Lead(II) bis[oxidotellurate(IV)] tellurate(VI) top
Crystal data top
PbTe3O8Dx = 7.360 Mg m−3
Mr = 717.99Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, P42/mCell parameters from 4370 reflections
a = 6.9345 (3) Åθ = 3.0–29.4°
c = 6.7369 (4) ŵ = 39.29 mm−1
V = 323.96 (3) Å3T = 296 K
Z = 2Fragment, colourless
F(000) = 6040.10 × 0.02 × 0.01 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
499 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω– and φ–scansRint = 0.031
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
θmax = 29.9°, θmin = 2.9°
Tmin = 0.155, Tmax = 0.349h = −9→9
7237 measured reflectionsk = −9→9
514 independent reflectionsl = −9→9
Refinement top
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullPrimary atom site location: isomorphous structure methods
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0619P)2 + 13.4507P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.112(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.12Δρmax = 3.82 e Å−3
514 reflectionsΔρmin = −4.85 e Å−3
34 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Pb10.0000000.0000000.2500000.0409 (4)
Te10.43446 (12)0.21418 (12)0.0000000.0105 (3)
Te20.0000000.5000000.0000000.0066 (3)
O10.4112 (10)0.1842 (10)0.3063 (10)0.0125 (12)
O20.1237 (14)0.2511 (13)0.0000000.0111 (17)
O30.6731 (15)0.0454 (14)0.0000000.0129 (18)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Pb10.0373 (4)0.0373 (4)0.0480 (7)0.0000.0000.000
Te10.0105 (4)0.0101 (4)0.0109 (4)0.0020 (3)0.0000.000
Te20.0086 (5)0.0052 (5)0.0061 (5)0.0025 (3)0.0000.000
O10.019 (3)0.012 (3)0.007 (3)0.007 (2)0.001 (2)0.001 (2)
O20.009 (4)0.007 (4)0.017 (4)0.003 (3)0.0000.000
O30.012 (4)0.013 (4)0.014 (4)0.007 (3)0.0000.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Pb1—O2i2.570 (7)Te1—O3vii1.948 (10)
Pb1—O2ii2.570 (7)Te1—O32.027 (9)
Pb1—O2iii2.570 (7)Te1—O12.080 (7)
Pb1—O22.570 (7)Te1—O1x2.080 (7)
Pb1—O3iv2.842 (8)Te1—O22.170 (9)
Pb1—O3v2.842 (8)Te2—O1iv1.927 (7)
Pb1—O3vi2.842 (8)Te2—O1xi1.927 (7)
Pb1—O3vii2.842 (8)Te2—O1ix1.927 (7)
Pb1—O13.147 (8)Te2—O1xii1.927 (7)
Pb1—O1viii3.147 (8)Te2—O21.927 (9)
Pb1—O1ii3.147 (7)Te2—O2xiii1.927 (9)
Pb1—O1ix3.147 (7)
O2i—Pb1—O2ii115.43 (15)O1—Pb1—O1ii90.83 (3)
O2i—Pb1—O2iii115.43 (15)O1viii—Pb1—O1ii90.83 (3)
O2ii—Pb1—O2iii98.1 (3)O2i—Pb1—O1ix113.5 (2)
O2i—Pb1—O298.1 (3)O2ii—Pb1—O1ix131.0 (2)
O2ii—Pb1—O2115.43 (15)O2iii—Pb1—O1ix60.1 (2)
O2iii—Pb1—O2115.43 (15)O2—Pb1—O1ix56.1 (2)
O2i—Pb1—O3iv165.0 (3)O3iv—Pb1—O1ix52.7 (2)
O2ii—Pb1—O3iv78.6 (3)O3v—Pb1—O1ix60.3 (2)
O2iii—Pb1—O3iv54.6 (3)O3vi—Pb1—O1ix138.5 (2)
O2—Pb1—O3iv79.10 (19)O3vii—Pb1—O1ix110.6 (2)
O2i—Pb1—O3v54.6 (3)O1—Pb1—O1ix90.83 (3)
O2ii—Pb1—O3v165.0 (3)O1viii—Pb1—O1ix90.83 (3)
O2iii—Pb1—O3v79.10 (19)O1ii—Pb1—O1ix166.2 (3)
O2—Pb1—O3v78.6 (3)O3vii—Te1—O377.2 (5)
O3iv—Pb1—O3v110.57 (12)O3vii—Te1—O183.0 (2)
O2i—Pb1—O3vi79.10 (19)O3—Te1—O190.32 (18)
O2ii—Pb1—O3vi54.6 (3)O3vii—Te1—O1x83.0 (2)
O2iii—Pb1—O3vi78.6 (3)O3—Te1—O1x90.32 (18)
O2—Pb1—O3vi165.0 (3)O1—Te1—O1x165.5 (4)
O3iv—Pb1—O3vi107.3 (2)O3vii—Te1—O274.3 (4)
O3v—Pb1—O3vi110.57 (12)O3—Te1—O2151.5 (4)
O2i—Pb1—O3vii78.6 (3)O1—Te1—O286.3 (2)
O2ii—Pb1—O3vii79.10 (19)O1x—Te1—O286.3 (2)
O2iii—Pb1—O3vii165.0 (3)O1iv—Te2—O1xi180.0
O2—Pb1—O3vii54.6 (3)O1iv—Te2—O1ix94.8 (4)
O3iv—Pb1—O3vii110.57 (12)O1xi—Te2—O1ix85.2 (4)
O3v—Pb1—O3vii107.3 (2)O1iv—Te2—O1xii85.2 (4)
O3vi—Pb1—O3vii110.57 (12)O1xi—Te2—O1xii94.8 (4)
O2i—Pb1—O1131.0 (2)O1ix—Te2—O1xii180.0 (4)
O2ii—Pb1—O156.1 (2)O1iv—Te2—O289.5 (3)
O2iii—Pb1—O1113.5 (2)O1xi—Te2—O290.5 (3)
O2—Pb1—O160.1 (2)O1ix—Te2—O290.5 (3)
O3iv—Pb1—O160.3 (2)O1xii—Te2—O289.5 (3)
O3v—Pb1—O1138.5 (2)O1iv—Te2—O2xiii90.5 (3)
O3vi—Pb1—O1110.6 (2)O1xi—Te2—O2xiii89.5 (3)
O3vii—Pb1—O152.7 (2)O1ix—Te2—O2xiii89.5 (3)
O2i—Pb1—O1viii60.1 (2)O1xii—Te2—O2xiii90.5 (3)
O2ii—Pb1—O1viii113.5 (2)O2—Te2—O2xiii180.0
O2iii—Pb1—O1viii56.1 (2)Te2xiv—O1—Te1135.5 (3)
O2—Pb1—O1viii131.0 (2)Te2xiv—O1—Pb195.9 (3)
O3iv—Pb1—O1viii110.6 (2)Te1—O1—Pb189.5 (2)
O3v—Pb1—O1viii52.7 (2)Te2—O2—Te1123.2 (5)
O3vi—Pb1—O1viii60.3 (2)Te2—O2—Pb1i117.3 (3)
O3vii—Pb1—O1viii138.5 (2)Te1—O2—Pb1i104.6 (3)
O1—Pb1—O1viii166.2 (3)Te2—O2—Pb1117.3 (3)
O2i—Pb1—O1ii56.1 (2)Te1—O2—Pb1104.6 (3)
O2ii—Pb1—O1ii60.1 (2)Pb1i—O2—Pb181.9 (3)
O2iii—Pb1—O1ii131.0 (2)Te1vii—O3—Te1102.8 (5)
O2—Pb1—O1ii113.5 (2)Te1vii—O3—Pb1xv101.7 (3)
O3iv—Pb1—O1ii138.5 (2)Te1—O3—Pb1xv135.7 (3)
O3v—Pb1—O1ii110.6 (2)Te1vii—O3—Pb1vii101.7 (3)
O3vi—Pb1—O1ii52.7 (2)Te1—O3—Pb1vii135.7 (3)
O3vii—Pb1—O1ii60.3 (2)Pb1xv—O3—Pb1vii72.7 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z; (ii) y, −x, −z+1/2; (iii) −y, x, z+1/2; (iv) y, −x+1, −z+1/2; (v) x−1, y, z; (vi) −y, x−1, z+1/2; (vii) −x+1, −y, −z; (viii) −x, −y, z; (ix) −y, x, −z+1/2; (x) x, y, −z; (xi) −y, x, z−1/2; (xii) y, −x+1, z−1/2; (xiii) −x, −y+1, −z; (xiv) −y+1, x, z+1/2; (xv) x+1, y, z.
 

Acknowledgements

The X-ray Centre of TU Wien is acknowledged for providing access to instrumentation and analysis software and TU Wien Bibliothek for financial support through its Open Access Funding Program.

References

Return to citationAddison, A. W., Rao, T. N., Reedijk, J., van Rijn, J. & Verschoor, G. C. (1984). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1349–1356.  CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationAlazoumi, S. H., Sidek, H. A. A., El-Mallawany, R., Kamari, H. M., Zaid, M. H. M. & Ali, E. A. G. E. (2018). Appl. Phys. A 124, 845.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationAroyo, M. I., Perez-Mato, J. M., Capillas, C., Kroumova, E., Ivantchev, S., Madariaga, G., Kirov, A. & Wondratschek, H. (2006). Z. Kristallogr. 221, 15–27.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationArtner, C. & Weil, M. (2013). J. Solid State Chem. 199, 240–247.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBarrier, N., Malo, S., Hernandez, O., Hervieu, M. & Raveau, B. (2006). J. Solid State Chem. 179, 3484–3488.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2018). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA  Google Scholar
Return to citationChamparnaud-Mesjard, J. C., Thomas, P., Colas-Dutreilh, M. & Oufkir, A. (2001). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 216, 185–186.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationChristy, A. G., Mills, S. J. & Kampf, A. R. (2016). Mineral. Mag. 80, 415–545.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationDewan, J. C., Edwards, A. J., Jones, G. R. & Young, I. M. (1978). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1528–1532.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationDowty, E. (2006). ATOMS for Windows. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationEffenberger, H., Zemann, J. & Mayer, H. (1978). Am. Mineral. 63, 847–852.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationFlor, G. de la, Orobengoa, D., Tasci, E., Perez-Mato, J. M. & Aroyo, M. I. (2016). J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 653–664.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2018). Acta Cryst. B74, 79–96.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHamani, D., Masson, O. & Thomas, P. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 1243–1251.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHladik, M., Penz, A., Purtscher, F. R. S., Hofer, T. S., Heymann, G. & Weil, M. (2024). Dalton Trans. 53, 19214–19225.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationKampf, A. R., Housley, R. M., Mills, S. J., Marty, J. & Thorne, B. (2010). Am. Mineral. 95, 1329–1336.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKampf, A. R., Missen, O. P., Mills, S. J., Ma, C., Housley, R. M., Chorazewicz, M., Marty, J., Coolbaugh, M. & Momma, K. (2022). Can. Mineral. 60, 805–814.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKanatzidis, M. G. (2010). Chem. Mater. 22, 648–659.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationLink, L. & Niewa, R. (2023). J. Appl. Cryst. 56, 1855–1864.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMa, Y., Wang, W., Liu, Q., Zhang, L., Lei, L., Zhang, L. & Liu, Z. (2017). Solid State Commun. 260, 1–5.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMariolacos, K. (1969). Anz. Oesterr. Akad. Wiss. Math. Naturwiss. Kl. 106, 129–131.  Google Scholar
Return to citationMathers, F. C. & Graham, F. V. (1929). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51, 3225–3228.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMissen, O. P., Kampf, A. R., Mills, S. J., Housley, R. M., Spratt, J., Welch, M. D., Coolbaugh, M. F., Marty, J., Chorazewicz, M. & Ferraris, F. (2019a). Mineral. Mag. 83, 539–549.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMissen, O. P., Rumsey, M. S., Kampf, A. R., Mills, S. J., Back, M. E. & Spratt, J. (2019b). Mineral. Mag. 83, 791–797.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationOufkir, A., Dutreilh, M., Thomas, P., Champarnaud-Mesjard, J. C., Marchet, P. & Frit, B. (2001). Mater. Res. Bull. 36, 693–703.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationRobin, M. B. & Day, P. (1967). Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 10, 247–422.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSciau, P., Lapasset, J. & Moret, J. (1986). Acta Cryst. C42, 1688–1690.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSleight, A. W., Foris, C. M. & Licis, M. S. (1972). Inorg. Chem. 11, 1157–1158.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationWalsh, A., Payne, D. J., Egdell, R. G. & Watson, G. W. (2011). Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 4455–4463.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationWeil, M., Shirkhanlou, M., Füglein, E. & Libowitzky, E. (2018). Crystals 8, 51.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationWeil, M. & Stöger, B. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, i116–i118.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationZavodnik, V. E., Ivanov, S. A. & Stash, A. I. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, i16.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890