early career research\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Crystal structure of (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidine hydro­chloride

crossmark logo

aTulane University, Department of Chemistry, 6400 Freret Street, 2015 Percival Stern Hall, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA, and bDepartment of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by T. Akitsu, Tokyo University of Science, Japan (Received 1 October 2026; accepted 27 October 2026; online 6 November 2026)

This article is part of the collection Early Career Scientists in Structural Science.

The title compound [also called (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidin-1-ium chloride], C4H9FN+·Cl−, crystallizes in the monoclinic Sohncke space group P21 (#4). The asymmetric unit contains one 3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium cation and one chloride anion. The pyrrolidinium ring adopts a puckered conformation, and the fluorine substituent is bonded to C3 at a distance of 1.396 (3) Å. In the crystal, the ammonium N—H groups form hydrogen bonds with the chloride anions, creating an extended hydrogen-bonded arrangement. Although 3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium derivatives have been investigated as chiral organic components in hybrid materials, including magnetic and ferroelectric systems, the crystallographic characterization of the hydro­chloride salt itself has not been reported.

1. Chemical context

In recent years, chiral 3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium cations have attracted inter­est as the organic components in organic–inorganic hybrid materials with magnetic and ferroelectric properties. The addition of (R)- and (S)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium in cyanido-bridged dimetallic materials has led to the creation of homochiral multiferroic substances that exhibit ferroelectric and ferroelastic behavior (Mao et al., 2022View full citation).

(R)- and (S)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium cations have also been integrated into quasi-two-dimensional copper(II) chloride hybrid perovskites, materials, which, with the mol­ecule's addition, exhibit magnetic chirality (Zhang et al., 2026View full citation). In addition, the cation has been used in the context of alkaline-earth-metal hybrid perovskites, one of which being [(R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium]Ba(ClO4)3 where mol­ecular fluorination demonstrated an enhancement of several ferroelectric properties relative to the corresponding unsubstituted pyrrolidinium material (Zhou et al., 2025View full citation). (R)-3-Fluoro­pyrrolidinium has also been used to create hexa­gonal perovskite-type manganese(II) chloride ferroelectrics (Ai et al., 2019View full citation).

[Scheme 1]

Despite the incorporation of 3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium in many chiral organic–inorganic hybrid materials, the hydro­chloride salt of (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidine [also known as (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium chloride], does not have a publicly reported crystal structure. The structure presented here therefore provides a crystallographic characterization of the organic salt, which enables the conformation, stereochemistry, and inter­molecular inter­actions of the 3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium cation to be independently examined, not in the context of an inorganic hybrid framework.

2. Structural commentary

The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic Sohncke space group P21 (#4). The asymmetric unit contains one (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium cation and one chloride anion (Fig. 1[link]). Two formula units compose the unit cell. The pyrrolidinium ring has a non-planarenvelope conformation, with C3 out of plane. The C1—C2—C3—C4 and C2—C3—C4—N1 torsion angles are 36.2 (2)° and −33.8 (2)°, respectively, indicating that the five-membered ring is puckered rather than planar. The C3 atom is bonded to fluorine, with a bond length of 1.396 (3) Å, and the geometry around this carbon is approximately tetra­hedral with F1—C3—C2, F1—C3—C4, and C2—C3—C4 angles of 109.2 (2), 109.1 (2), and 103.98 (16)°, respectively. The protonated nitro­gen also has approximately tetra­hedral geometry.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Mol­ecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

3. Supra­molecular features

The cations and chloride anions are connected through N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2[link], Table 1[link]). Each pyrrolidinium cation contains two N—H groups, which both participate in hydrogen bonding with the chloride anions. Nearly linear, these inter­actions connect neighboring ions and allow for an extended hydrogen-bonded structure throughout the crystal.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl1 0.87 (3) 2.20 (3) 3.0770 (18) 178 (2)
N1—H1B⋯Cl1i 0.85 (3) 2.22 (3) 3.0686 (18) 174 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Hydrogen-bonding network in the title compound viewed down the b axis, with Cl− ions shown in yellow.

4. Database survey

Unfluorinated pyrrolidine hydro­chloride crystallizes in the ortho­rhom­bic space group Pnma (#62) with V/Z = 155.877 Å3 (Giglmeier et al., 2009View full citation). Fluorination causes V/Z to increase to 159.532 Å3 in (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidine hydro­chloride, though thermal expansion may account for some of the difference in volume as the crystal structure of pyrrolidine hydro­chloride was collected at 200 K whereas the structure of (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidine hydro­chloride was collected at 295 K.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

1 mmol NiCl2·6H2O (Thermo Scientific) and 2 mmol (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidine hydro­chloride (Ambeed) were dissolved in 0.25 mL of methanol. Crystals were obtained by slow vapor diffusion of diethyl ether into the solution. After five days, the crystals were rinsed with the anti­solvent several times and dried under vacuum. The obtained crystals were found to be recrystallized (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidine hydro­chloride; an organic-inorganic hybrid material containing both nickel chloride and (R)-3-fluoro­pyrrolidinium did not form.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. Carbon-bonded hydrogen atoms were refined using a riding model with the C—H bond length allowed to vary using the HFIX 24 (two sp3 hydrogens for C1, C2, and C4) or HFIX 14 (one sp3 hydrogen for C3) commands in SHELXL. The positions of the nitro­gen-bonded hydrogen atoms (H1A and H1B) were allowed to freely refine, and their isotropic thermal parameters were set to 1.2Ueq(N). The structure was refined using the OLEX2 GUI (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation).

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C4H9FN+·Cl−
Mr 125.57
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21
Temperature (K) 295
a, b, c (Å) 5.1390 (1), 10.6704 (2), 6.3479 (1)
β (°) 113.564 (1)
V (Å3) 319.06 (1)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.50
Crystal size (mm) 0.38 × 0.21 × 0.16
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 Quest
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.932, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 18053, 1857, 1781
Rint 0.024
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) 0.705
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.025, 0.068, 1.07
No. of reflections 1857
No. of parameters 74
No. of restraints 1
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.23, −0.13
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 806 quotients [(I+)−(I−)]/[(I+)+(I−)] (Parsons et al. (2013View full citation)
Absolute structure parameter −0.017 (16)
Computer programs: BIS (Bruker, 2026View full citation), SAINT (Bruker, 2016View full citation), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2025/1 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citationb), PLATON (Spek, 2020View full citation) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

(R)-3-Fluoropyrrolidin-1-ium chloride top
Crystal data top
C4H9FN+·Cl−F(000) = 132
Mr = 125.57Dx = 1.307 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.1390 (1) ÅCell parameters from 9897 reflections
b = 10.6704 (2) Åθ = 3.5–28.2°
c = 6.3479 (1) ŵ = 0.50 mm−1
β = 113.564 (1)°T = 295 K
V = 319.06 (1) Å3Prism, brown
Z = 20.38 × 0.21 × 0.16 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D8 Quest
diffractometer
1857 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube1781 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Flat graphite monochromatorRint = 0.024
Detector resolution: 7.40 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.1°, θmin = 3.5°
ω and phi scansh = −7→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
k = −15→15
Tmin = 0.932, Tmax = 1.000l = −8→8
18053 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.040P)2 + 0.016P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.068(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3
1857 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.13 e Å−3
74 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 806 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al. (2013)
1 restraintAbsolute structure parameter: −0.017 (16)
Primary atom site location: dual
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.50723 (8)0.66790 (4)0.02568 (7)0.05125 (14)
F10.6093 (3)0.4266 (3)0.5424 (3)0.1009 (6)
N10.0917 (3)0.54125 (16)0.1987 (3)0.0477 (3)
H1A0.213 (6)0.577 (2)0.153 (4)0.057*
H1B−0.073 (6)0.574 (2)0.140 (4)0.057*
C10.0736 (5)0.4059 (3)0.1332 (4)0.0642 (5)
H1C−0.120 (5)0.3842 (6)0.027 (3)0.077*
H1D0.204 (3)0.3871 (5)0.0589 (18)0.077*
C20.1553 (6)0.3349 (2)0.3517 (5)0.0704 (6)
H2A0.259 (3)0.264 (2)0.3500 (5)0.084*
H2B−0.005 (5)0.3108 (8)0.3758 (9)0.084*
C30.3344 (4)0.4251 (3)0.5356 (4)0.0625 (5)
H30.3345 (4)0.4034 (7)0.686 (5)0.075*
C40.1987 (5)0.5491 (2)0.4540 (4)0.0609 (5)
H4A0.335 (3)0.6162 (15)0.5129 (14)0.073*
H4B0.044 (3)0.5631 (4)0.5017 (11)0.073*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.04294 (19)0.0534 (2)0.0592 (2)0.00460 (17)0.02232 (15)0.0093 (3)
F10.0422 (6)0.1661 (18)0.0836 (11)0.0214 (10)0.0139 (7)0.0195 (13)
N10.0365 (6)0.0502 (7)0.0559 (8)0.0036 (6)0.0179 (6)0.0085 (6)
C10.0690 (12)0.0578 (10)0.0551 (11)−0.0026 (10)0.0135 (9)−0.0105 (10)
C20.0733 (15)0.0504 (11)0.0848 (17)0.0087 (10)0.0289 (13)0.0116 (10)
C30.0512 (10)0.0869 (15)0.0486 (10)0.0086 (11)0.0189 (9)0.0120 (10)
C40.0596 (11)0.0633 (12)0.0561 (11)−0.0061 (9)0.0193 (9)−0.0136 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
F1—C31.396 (3)C2—H2A0.93 (3)
N1—H1A0.88 (3)C2—H2B0.93 (3)
N1—H1B0.85 (3)C2—C31.509 (4)
N1—C11.496 (3)C3—H30.98 (3)
N1—C41.491 (3)C3—C41.489 (4)
C1—H1C0.98 (2)C4—H4A0.97 (2)
C1—H1D0.98 (2)C4—H4B0.97 (2)
C1—C21.486 (4)
H1A—N1—H1B113 (2)H2A—C2—H2B108.9
C1—N1—H1A107.8 (16)C3—C2—H2A110.8
C1—N1—H1B109.6 (17)C3—C2—H2B110.8
C4—N1—H1A109.4 (15)F1—C3—C2109.2 (2)
C4—N1—H1B108.6 (18)F1—C3—H3111.4
C4—N1—C1108.14 (16)F1—C3—C4109.1 (2)
N1—C1—H1C110.6C2—C3—H3111.4
N1—C1—H1D110.6C4—C3—C2103.98 (16)
H1C—C1—H1D108.7C4—C3—H3111.4
C2—C1—N1105.65 (18)N1—C4—H4A110.9
C2—C1—H1C110.6N1—C4—H4B110.9
C2—C1—H1D110.6C3—C4—N1104.23 (18)
C1—C2—H2A110.8C3—C4—H4A110.9
C1—C2—H2B110.8C3—C4—H4B110.9
C1—C2—C3104.7 (2)H4A—C4—H4B108.9
F1—C3—C4—N182.6 (2)C1—C2—C3—C436.2 (2)
N1—C1—C2—C3−24.0 (2)C2—C3—C4—N1−33.8 (2)
C1—N1—C4—C319.2 (2)C4—N1—C1—C23.1 (2)
C1—C2—C3—F1−80.2 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl10.87 (3)2.20 (3)3.0770 (18)178 (2)
N1—H1B···Cl1i0.85 (3)2.22 (3)3.0686 (18)174 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x−1, y, z.
 

Acknowledgements

Data were collected in the Joel T. Mague X-ray Crystallography Laboratory at the Department of Chemistry, Tulane University.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Louisiana Board of Regents (contract No. LEQSF(2024-27)-RD-A-28).

References

Return to citationAi, Y., Chen, X.-G., Shi, P.-P., Tang, Y.-Y., Li, P.-F., Liao, W.-Q. & Xiong, R.-G. (2019). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 4474–4479.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2016). SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2026). BIS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGiglmeier, H., Kerscher, T., Klüfers, P. & Mayer, P. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o592.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMao, Y., Chen, X.-G., Gu, Z., Zhang, Z.-X., Song, X.-J., Gu, N. & Xiong, R. G. (2022). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202204135.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationParsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSpek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1–11.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationZhang, Z., Xu, M., Gonzalez Jimenez, J. L., Zhang, S., Xie, W., Xu, X. & Straus, D. B. (2026). JACS 148, 33895–33904.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationZhou, Q.-F., Pan, L., Ni, H.-F., Ye, L.-K., Zhao, Y.-P., Luo, Q.-K., Teri, G., Luo, J.-Q., Fu, D.-W., Zhang, Z.-X., Shi, C. & Zhang, Y. (2025). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202509006.  CrossRef Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890