protein structure communications
Substrate binding induces structural changes in cytochrome P450cam
aInstitute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Japan, bPicobiology Institute, Graduate School of Life Science, University of Hyogo, Koto 3-1-1, Kamigori-cho, Ako-gun, Hyogo 678-1205, Japan, and cDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: tsuki@protein.osaka-u.ac.jp
The binding of (+)-camphor to cytochrome P450cam (P450cam) expels a cluster of waters at the active site, raising the
of the haem to an extent that allows reduction by the electron-transfer system. This binding was reported to involve no significant structural changes in the protein. Here, two ferric P450cam structures partially complexed with (+)-camphor were determined by X-ray crystallography at 1.30–1.35 Å resolution, revealing the structures of the substrate-free and substrate-bound forms. (+)-Camphor binding induces rotation of Thr101 to form a hydrogen bond that acts as a hydrogen donor to a peripheral haem propionate. This bonding contributes to the redox-potential change.Keywords: cytochrome P450cam; (+)-camphor; redox potential.
3D view: 2zwt,2zwu
1. Introduction
Cytochrome P450cam (P450cam) is a thiolate haem-containing monooxygenase that catalyzes the regioselective and stereoselective hydroxylation of (+)-camphor to produce 5-exo-hydroxycamphor (Gunsalus et al., 1974). The reaction is initiated by the binding of (+)-camphor to the resting state of the enzyme. Substrate binding changes the spin state of the haem iron from low to high and raises its (Fe3+/Fe2+ couple) by ∼100 mV (Gunsalus et al., 1974; Sligar & Gunsalus, 1976), which allows the reduction of the enzyme by an electron-transfer system comprising NADH-putidaredoxin reductases and putidaredoxin. X-ray crystallographic studies on substrate-free (Poulos et al., 1986) and substrate-bound (Poulos et al., 1987) forms of the enzyme at 2.2 and 1.6 Å resolution, respectively, revealed that a cluster of waters (six molecules) at the active site of the substrate-free form, one of which binds to the haem iron, are expelled from the active site upon binding of (+)-camphor. This occurs without an accompanying conformational change of the protein apart from a slight shift (by about 0.3 Å) of a phenylalanine residue near the bound substrate. These crystallographic results explain the change in spin state and entropy-driven substrate binding (Griffin & Peterson, 1972). Recent X-ray structures of the substrate-bound form at 1.4–1.6 Å resolution (Schlichting et al., 2000; Meilleur et al., 2005) demonstrate that Thr101 forms a hydrogen bond to the haem 6-propionate, which differs from the previously observed conformation (Poulos et al., 1987). The formation of a hydrogen bond between Thr101 and the haem 6-propionate is important because it raises the of the haem iron. However, whether the conformational change of Thr101 is tightly coupled to the substrate binding remains unknown. To understand the mechanisms of the large redox-potential changes, elimination of the water cluster from the active site and other events that take place upon substrate binding, a higher resolution X-ray structure is necessary for the substrate-free form.
Here, we provide X-ray structures of the substrate-free and substrate-bound forms of the enzyme at 1.30–1.35 Å resolution. Substrate binding induces hydrogen-bond formation between Thr101 and the ionized haem 6-propionate side chain. This hydrogen bond may significantly increase the
of the haem.2. Materials and methods
2.1. Preparation of protein
Wild-type P450cam was expressed in Escherichia coli strain JM109 and was purified to by SDS–PAGE according to previously described procedures (Harada et al., 2008). The enzyme samples were dissolved in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.4 containing 50 mM KCl and 1 mM (+)-camphor, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 193 K until use. Enzyme samples with an absorption ratio of A391/A280 > 1.6 were used. Concentrations of the wild-type protein were spectrophotometrically determined using an extinction coefficient of 102 mM −1 cm−1 at 391 nm (Gunsalus & Wagner, 1978).
2.2. Crystallization
Crystals of the ferric form of P450cam were grown using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method. 3–5 µl P450cam solution (30 mg ml−1 P450cam, 250 mM KCl, 10 mM dithioerythritol, 1 mM (+)-camphor) was mixed with an equal volume of the reservoir solution [50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 250 mM KCl, 10 mM dithioerythritol, 1 mM (+)-camphor and 22–30%(w/v) PEG 4000] and allowed to stand at 268 K for 2 d.
2.3. Camphor soaking
Crystals of ferric P450cam grown in the crystallization buffer were transferred to a reservoir solution saturated with (+)-camphor and allowed to stand at 268 K for 1 d. The (+)-camphor-saturated solution was prepared by adding excess fine powdered (+)-camphor to the reservoir solution and stirring extensively for 1 d. Undissolved (+)-camphor was removed from the solution.
2.4. X-ray experiments and structure determination
After the crystals had been equilibrated with a solution containing 20%(v/v) 2-methyl-2,4-pentandiol (MPD), they were frozen in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data for crystals that had or had not been soaked in (+)-camphor-saturated buffer were collected on beamlines BL41XU and BL44XU at SPring-8, respectively. The diffraction images were indexed, integrated, scaled and merged using the programs HKL-2000 and SCALEPACK (Otwinoski & Minor, 1997).
Initial phasing of the crystals was performed by molecular replacement using the structure of ferric P450cam (PDB code 2cpp ) as a reference molecule and the program MOLREP (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994). The crystal structures were refined using the program REFMAC (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994). Difference Fourier maps were calculated with (Fo − Fc)exp(2πiαc) coefficients to detect the (+)-camphor molecule at the active site, where Fo and Fc were the observed and calculated structure amplitudes, respectively, and αc was the calculated phase. The refined structures were inspected using the program PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1993).
3. Results and discussion
Crystals of ferric P450cam were grown in crystallization buffer containing 1 mM (+)-camphor and the crystals grown were soaked in crystallization buffer saturated with (+)-camphor (∼8 mM). The structures of the soaked and unsoaked ferric P450cam crystals were solved at 1.30 Å (PDB code 2zwt ) and 1.35 Å (PDB code 2zwu ) resolution, respectively (Table 1). The structure of the unsoaked P450cam shows an active site that is partially occupied by (+)-camphor and a water molecule liganded to the haem iron and rotamers of Thr101 (Fig. 1). The water molecule bound to the haem iron is 1.56 Å from the C5 atom of (+)-camphor. Hence, the water does not coexist with (+)-camphor in one protein structure, indicating that the crystals are a mixture of (+)-camphor-bound and (+)-camphor-free forms. It was noted that the electron density arising from the keto group of (+)-camphor was much higher than that of the bound water, suggesting that the (+)-camphor-bound form is the major component and the water-bound form is the minor component. The two rotamers of the Thr101 side chain also showed unequal electron density; the form with the hydroxy group directed toward the peripheral haem 6-propionate showed much higher electron density than the form with the hydroxy group directed toward Tyr96. The structures of the minor and major components are depicted in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. In the soaked P450cam, the population of the major component increased, while the minor component decreased.
‡R factor = , where Fobs and Fcalc are the observed and calculated structure factors, respectively. Rfree was calculated for a randomly chosen 5% of reflections and R factor was calculated for the remaining 95% of reflections. |
To determine the occupancy of each Thr101 side-chain rotamer, we refined the structures of the soaked and unsoaked crystals under several different occupancy values. Refined temperature factors for the Thr101 side chain (the average of those for Cβ, Cγ and Oγ atoms) were found to correlate highly with occupancy (Figs. 3a and 3b) and we assumed that each rotamer would have the same temperature factor. When the occupancies of the rotamers represented by the major- and minor-component structures of the unsoaked crystals were 66 and 34%, respectively, they have the same temperature factor of 10.6 Å2 (Fig. 3a). Similarly, the occupancies of the major and minor rotamers of the soaked crystal were determined as 78 and 22%, respectively (Fig. 3b).
Refinements for the (+)-camphor molecule and the haem-bound water under several sets of occupancies were performed for the unsoaked and soaked crystals to determine their occupancies, assuming that the temperature factors of the (+)-camphor and water are almost equal to the temperature factor of the haem group. The occupancies and temperature factors are highly correlated (Figs. 4a and 4b). For the unsoaked crystal, when the respective occupancies of the (+)-camphor and the water were 66 and 35%, their temperature factors were almost equal to the averaged temperature factor of the haem group of 9.5 Å2 (Fig. 4a). Since the (+)-camphor molecule cannot coexist with the water molecule, 35% occupancy of the water molecule is equivalent to 65% occupancy of the (+)-camphor molecule. Thus, the estimated occupancy of (+)-camphor in the unsoaked crystal is 65–66%. For the soaked crystal, occupancies of 78 and 24% for the (+)-camphor and water, respectively, resulted in temperature factors nearly equal to that of the haem group (Fig. 4b). Consequently, the estimated occupancy of (+)-camphor in the soaked crystal is 76–78%.
These analyses indicate that the occupancy of the major Thr101 rotamer is almost identical to that of the occupancy of (+)-camphor and that that of the minor Thr101 rotamer is almost equal to that of the water molecule. These agreements imply that (+)-camphor binding to the active site changes the conformation of the Thr101 side chain from that of the minor component to that of the major component. Thus, the structure of the major component shown in Fig. 2(b) is the structure of (+)-camphor-bound P450cam, while the structure of the minor component shown in Fig. 2(a) is the (+)-camphor-free (water-bound) structure. Our substrate-free structure superposes well with the previously reported structure of Poulos et al. (1986). In the free structure, it has been reported that six water molecules, including a water molecule bound to haem, are located in the substrate-binding site. Such water molecules are also suggested in this study by observed electron density other than that of the bound (+)-camphor both in the soaked and unsoaked crystals.
The present study indicates that Thr101 hydrogen bonds to Tyr96 in the camphor-free state (Fig. 2a) and changes conformation upon (+)-camphor binding to form a hydrogen bond to the peripheral 6-propionate of haem (Fig. 2b). Since Thr101 functions as the hydrogen donor in the hydrogen bond, it raises the of the haem iron. This conformational change of Thr101 together with the spin-state change contributes to the efficiency of (+)-camphor hydroxylation catalyzed by this enzyme.
References
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Griffin, B. W. & Peterson, J. A. (1972). Biochemistry, 11, 4740–4746. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Gunsalus, I. C., Meeks, J. R., Lipscomb, J. D., Debrunner, P. & Munck, E. (1974). In Molecular Mechanism of Oxygen Activation, edited by O. Hayaishi. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Gunsalus, I. C. & Wagner, G. C. (1978). Methods Enzymol. 52, 166–188. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harada, K., Sakurai, K., Ikemura, K., Ogura, T., Hirota, S., Shimada, H. & Hayashi, T. (2008). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 432–433. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. (1993). J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 283–291. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Meilleur, F., Dauvergne, M.-T., Schlichting, I. & Myles, D. A. A. (2005). Acta Cryst. D61, 539–544. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Poulos, T. L., Finzel, B. C. & Howard, A. J. (1986). Biochemistry, 25, 5314–5322. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Poulos, T. L., Finzel, B. C. & Howard, A. J. (1987). J. Mol. Biol. 195, 687–700. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Schlichting, I., Berendzen, J., Chu, K., Stock, A. M., Maves, S. A., Benson, D. E., Sweet, R. M., Ringe, D., Petsko, G. A. & Sligar, S. G. (2000). Science, 287, 1615–1622. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sligar, S. G. & Gunsalus, I. C. (1976). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 73, 1078–1082. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.