![cross.png](/logos/buttonlogos/cross.png)
![cross.png](/logos/buttonlogos/cross.png)
crystallization communications
![Open Access](/logos/open.png)
Overexpression, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of the C-terminal cytosolic domain of mouse anoctamin 1
aResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea, bDepartment of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea, and cCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 156-756, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence e-mail: hyunjungkim@cau.ac.kr, bwhan@snu.ac.kr
Transmembrane protein 16A (TMEM16A, also known as anoctamin 1; ANO1) is a bona fide Ca2+-activated chloride channel that is activated by intracellular Ca2+- and Ca2+-mobilizing stimuli and plays important roles in a variety of physiological functions. To elucidate the structural features of ANO1, structural analysis of the C-terminal cytosolic domain of mouse ANO1 (mANO1-CTD) was initiated. mANO1-CTD was overexpressed in Escherichia coli and was crystallized at 297 K using a reservoir solution consisting of 0.2 M sodium acetate trihydrate, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.5 and 30%(w/v) PEG 4000. X-ray diffraction data were collected to 2.3 Å resolution. The crystals belonged to the orthorhombic P212121, with unit-cell parameters a = 73.96, b = 103.73, c = 114.71 Å. If it is assumed that eight copies of a monomer molecule are present in the crystallographic the crystal volume per protein mass (VM) is 2.38 Å3 Da−1 and the solvent content is 48.38%. Attempts to solve the structure of mANO1-CTD by the MAD method using selenomethionine-labelled mANO1-CTD or heavy-atom-derivatized crystals are in progress.
Keywords: anoctamin 1; transmembrane protein 16A; chloride channels.
1. Introduction
Ca2+-activated chloride channels (CaCCs) play essential roles in many physiological processes, including transepithelial secretion, cardiac and neuronal excitation, sensory transduction, smooth muscle contraction and fertilization (Eggermont, 2004; Frings et al., 2000
; Hartzell et al., 2005
; Large & Wang, 1996
). Anoctamin 1 (ANO1) is a recently discovered member of the CaCCs which is highly expressed in secretory epithelial tissues, including ductal glands, superficial epithelia of the airway, and oviduct, where it has been implicated to play a key role in calcium-dependent chloride secretion (Caputo et al., 2008
; Schroeder et al., 2008
; Yang et al., 2008
).
ANO1 is one of the members of the anoctamin (ANO, also known as transmembrane protein 16; TMEM16) family of membrane proteins, which consists of ten members (ANO1–10) in mammals. ANO1 consists of 26 exons and has been predicted to code for a variety of proteins (Caputo et al., 2008). It belongs to a protein family with eight transmembrane helices and N- and C-terminal domains that face the cytoplasm (Galindo & Vacquier, 2005
). ANO1 is essential for Ca2+-dependent Cl− currents in airways, the large intestine, salivary glands, pancreatic glands and hepatocytes (Ousingsawat et al., 2009
; Rock et al., 2009
; Romanenko et al., 2010
). Severe transport defects have been detected in epithelial tissues of ANO1-knockout mice, leading to reduced saliva production and attenuated mucociliary clearance of the airways (Lee & Foskett, 2010
; Ousingsawat et al., 2009
; Rock et al., 2009
). Disruption of mouse ANO1 caused abnormal development of the trachea, indicating that the gene is a regulator of epithelial and smooth muscle cell organization in murine development (Rock et al., 2009
).
In addition to these results, recent studies have suggested the possibility that ANO1 proteins participate in tumourigenesis (Lee & Foskett, 2010; Yang et al., 2008
). The relationship between ANO1 and tumourigenesis has not been explained clearly, but a secretory environment might be important for tumour-cell proliferation. Thus, analysis of the ANO1 expression pattern in tumours could be used for the prediction or treatment of cancer.
To facilitate the structural characterization of ANO1, we initiated structural study of the C-terminal cytosolic domain of mouse ANO1 (mANO1-CTD; residues 883–960; Fig. 1). In this report, we describe the overexpression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of recombinant mANO1-CTD.
![]() | Figure 1 Predicted topology of mANO1. The cytosolic C-terminal domain of mANO1 is coloured red. |
2. Methods and results
2.1. Protein expression and purification
mANO1-CTD was cloned into the expression vector pET-15b(+) (Novagen), adding a hexahistidine-containing 20-residue tag to the N-terminus. The recombinant protein was overexpressed in Escherichia coli Rosetta2(DE3)pLysS cells using Luria broth culture medium. Protein expression was induced by 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside and the cells were incubated for 16 h at 293 K following growth to mid-log phase at 310 K. The cells were lysed by sonication in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 35 mM imidazole and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride). The supernatant was applied onto a HiTrap Chelating HP column (GE Healthcare) which was previously equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl and 35 mM imidazole). The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 0.035–1.0 M imidazole in buffer A. The eluted sample was further purified by gel filtration on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 prep-grade column (GE Healthcare) which was equilibrated with 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 and 200 mM NaCl. The buffer of the fractions containing mANO1-CTD was gradually changed to buffer B (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 and 50 mM NaCl) using a Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter device (Millipore). The sample was applied onto a HiTrap SP ion-exchange column (GE Healthcare) which was previously equilibrated with buffer B. The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 0.05−1.0 M NaCl in buffer B. The of the purified protein was assessed by SDS–PAGE. The buffer of the fractions containing mANO1-CTD was changed to 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5 and 100 mM NaCl to reduce the concentration of NaCl and purified mANO1-CTD was concentrated to a final concentration of 9 mg ml−1 using an Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter device (Millipore).
2.2. Crystallization and X-ray data collection
Crystals were grown by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method at 297 K by mixing equal volumes (1 µl each) of protein solution and reservoir solution. Crystals appeared after three weeks using a reservoir solution consisting of 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 0.2 M sodium acetate trihydrate and 30%(v/v) PEG 4000 with approximate dimensions of 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.3 mm (Fig. 2).
![]() | Figure 2 Native crystals of mANO1-CTD. The crystal dimensions are approximately 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.3 mm. |
For diffraction data collection, the crystals were directly soaked in a cryoprotectant solution composed of 30%(v/v) glycerol added to the reservoir solution. X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K on a Quantum 4R CCD detector (Area Detector Systems Corporation, Poway, California, USA) at the BL-6C experimental station of Pohang Light Source, Republic of Korea (Fig. 3). For each image the crystal was rotated by 1° and the raw data were processed using the HKL-2000 program suite (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997
). A total of 280 647 measured reflections were merged into 40 051 unique reflections with an Rmerge of 12.7% and a completeness of 99.9%. The was determined to be P212121 on the basis of and symmetry of diffraction intensities using the POINTLESS program from CCP4 (Winn et al., 2011
). The unit-cell parameters are a = 73.96, b = 103.73, c = 114.71 Å. Table 1
summarizes the statistics of data collection. If it is assumed that eight copies of a are present in the crystallographic the crystal volume per protein mass (VM) is 2.38 Å3 Da−1 and the solvent content is 48.38%. Attempts to solve the structure of mANO1-CTD by the MAD method using selenomethionine-labelled mANO1-CTD or heavy-atom-derivatized crystals are in progress.
![]() ![]() |
![]() | Figure 3 X-ray diffraction image from an mANO1-CTD crystal. The edge of the detector corresponds to a resolution of 2.0 Å. |
Footnotes
‡These authors contributed equally to this work.
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff at beamline BL-6C of Pohang Light Source for assistance during X-ray experiments. This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program (2010-0028257 and 2011-0004305) and the Global Frontier (NRF-M1AXA002-2010-0029770) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology and by a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A092006).
References
Caputo, A., Caci, E., Ferrera, L., Pedemonte, N., Barsanti, C., Sondo, E., Pfeffer, U., Ravazzolo, R., Zegarra-Moran, O. & Galietta, L. J. (2008). Science, 322, 590–594. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Eggermont, J. (2004). Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 1, 22–27. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Frings, S., Reuter, D. & Kleene, S. J. (2000). Prog. Neurobiol. 60, 247–289. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Galindo, B. E. & Vacquier, V. D. (2005). Int. J. Mol. Med. 16, 919–924. PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hartzell, C., Putzier, I. & Arreola, J. (2005). Annu. Rev. Physiol. 67, 719–758. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Large, W. A. & Wang, Q. (1996). Am. J. Physiol. 271, C435–C454. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lee, R. J. & Foskett, J. K. (2010). Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 298, L210–L231. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Ousingsawat, J., Martins, J. R., Schreiber, R., Rock, J. R., Harfe, B. D. & Kunzelmann, K. (2009). J. Biol. Chem. 284, 28698–28703. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Rock, J. R., O'Neal, W. K., Gabriel, S. E., Randell, S. H., Harfe, B. D., Boucher, R. C. & Grubb, B. R. (2009). J. Biol. Chem. 284, 14875–14880. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Romanenko, V. G., Catalán, M. A., Brown, D. A., Putzier, I., Hartzell, H. C., Marmorstein, A. D., Gonzalez-Begne, M., Rock, J. R., Harfe, B. D. & Melvin, J. E. (2010). J. Biol. Chem. 285, 12990–13001. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schroeder, B. C., Cheng, T., Jan, Y. N. & Jan, L. Y. (2008). Cell, 134, 1019–1029. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yang, Y. D., Cho, H., Koo, J. Y., Tak, M. H., Cho, Y., Shim, W.-S., Park, S. P., Lee, J., Lee, B., Kim, B.-M., Raouf, R., Shin, Y. K. & Oh, U. (2008). Nature (London), 455, 1210–1215. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
![Open Access](/logos/open.png)