research communications
Expression, purification, crystallization and crystallographic study of Lutzomyia longipalpis LJL143
aNational School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1102 Bates Avenue, Suite 550, Mail Stop BCM320, Houston, TX 77030-3411, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: asojo@bcm.edu
Leishmaniasis is a neglected vector-borne disease with a global prevalence of over 12 million cases and 59 000 annual deaths. Transmission of the parasite requires salivary proteins, including LJL143 from the New World sandfly Lutzomyia longipalpis. LJL143 is a known marker of sandfly exposure in zoonotic hosts. LJL143 was crystallized from soluble protein expressed using Pichia pastoris. X-ray data were collected to 2.6 Å resolution from orthorhombic crystals belonging to P212121, with average unit-cell parameters a = 57.39, b = 70.24, c = 79.58 Å. The crystals are predicted to have a monomer in the with an estimated solvent content of 48.5%. LJL143 has negligible homology to any reported structures, so the phases could not be determined by All attempts at S-SAD failed and future studies include experimental phase determination using heavy-atom derivatives.
Keywords: leishmaniasis; Lutzomyia longipalpis; neglected tropical diseases; diagnosis; sandfly; salivary proteins; transmission.
1. Introduction
Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease that is endemic in over 88 countries and is caused by over 20 species and subspecies of parasitic protozoa of the genus Leishmania. Clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis vary from self-healing skin lesions to fever, anemia, skin destruction and death (Pavli & Maltezou, 2010). There are four main clinical forms of leishmaniasis: visceral leishmaniasis, cutaneous leishmaniasis, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis. Visceral leishmaniasis is the most serious form and can be fatal if left untreated. While most cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis are mild and heal without treatment, other forms of leishmaniasis are treated with pentavalent antimony drugs, including meglumine antimonate and sodium stibogluconate (Mohamed-Ahmed et al., 2012; Maltezou, 2008). Drug resistance has been reported, leading to the use of more toxic and less effective compounds such as amphotericin B (Mohamed-Ahmed et al., 2012; Maltezou, 2008). Alternative control strategies are needed because of the failure of current therapeutics and the presence of many reservoir hosts (https://www.who.int/tdr/diseases/leish/info/en/index.html).
Leishmania parasites are transmitted to humans by sandflies of the genus Phlebotomus and Lutzomyia in the Old and New Worlds, respectively (Collin et al., 2009). To facilitate its blood meal, a sandfly injects saliva into the host, which enhances the survival of injected Leishmania promastigotes and the establishment of disease transmission (Titus & Ribeiro, 1988; Valenzuela et al., 2001; Bezerra & Teixeira, 2001; Andrade et al., 2007; Gomes et al., 2008; Costa et al., 2013). Additionally, the sandfly salivary proteins result in the production of antibodies that can serve as markers of exposure (Belkaid et al., 1998). LJL143 from the saliva of the New World sandfly L. longipalpis is a known marker of exposure in zoonotic reservoirs (Teixeira et al., 2010; Collin et al., 2009). Structural studies of LJL143 were initiated as part of ongoing efforts to characterize the structure and functions of sandfly antigens. The production, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction studies of LJL143 are presented.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Macromolecule production
DNA coding for the mature LJL143 peptide and a C-terminal hexahistidine tag was codon-optimized based on the yeast codon preference (GenScript, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA). The synthesized gene included EcoRI and XbaI restriction sites for subcloning into the pPICZα A vector (Table 1). The plasmid DNA was linearized and transformed into Pichia pastoris strain X33 by electroporation as described previously (Zhan et al., 2005). 20 colonies with the correct insert were screened for the expression of recombinant LJL143 protein with 0.5% methanol at 303 K for 72 h. The highest expressing colony was used to make a 1 l starter culture using buffered minimal glycerol medium (BMGY; 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.0, 1.34% yeast nitrogen base, 4 × 10−5% biotin, 1% yeast extract, 1% glycerol). Approximately 250 ml of the starter culture was added to a 14 l vessel containing 5 l basal salt medium (BSM; 26.7 ml 85% phosphoric acid, 0.93 g calcium sulfate, 18.2 g potassium sulfate, 14.9 g magnesium sulfate, 4.13 g potassium hydroxide and 40 g glycerol per litre). The BSM was maintained at pH 5 by the addition of 14% ammonium hydroxide. Antifoam 204 was added to minimize foaming. About 16 h into a dissolved-oxygen (DO) spike from the depletion of glycerol was observed, which prompted the initiation of a fed-batch phase. During the fed-batch phase, 50% glycerol was added to the culture at 15 ml per litre per hour for 6 h. In the last 2 h of the fed-batch phase, the pH of the culture was ramped from 1 to 6.0 and the temperature was reduced by 2 K. The fed-batch phase was followed by an 8 h methanol-adaptation phase during which the agitation was increased to 700 rev min−1 and a methanol feed was ramped to 11 ml per litre per hour, which was maintained until the end of fermentation.
|
After 72 h of induction, the culture medium containing the secreted LJL143 protein was separated from the yeast cells by centrifugation at 12 000g for 30 min and filtered with a 0.22 µm membrane filter. The clarified supernatant was buffer-exchanged into the binding buffer (500 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM imidazole, 20 mM Tris pH 8.0) using a 3 kDa hollow-fiber cartridge (GE Healthcare). LJL143 was purified by immobilized metal-ion (IMAC) using a 5 ml HisTrap FF column (GE Healthcare). Nonspecifically bound proteins were removed by sequential steps of washing with 5, 10, 25 and 55 mM imidazole prior to protein elution with 500 mM imidazole. LJL143 was purified to ∼99% as assessed by Coomassie-stained SDS–PAGE (Fig. 1a). The protein band was verified to be LJL143 by Western blotting using both anti-His-tag monoclonal antibody (Fig. 1b) and mouse antiserum against LJL143 (Fig. 1c).
2.2. Crystallization
Recombinant LJL143 was buffer-exchanged and concentrated to 23 mg ml−1 in 50 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.0 using a 10K cutoff centrifugal concentrating device (Millipore). The protein concentration was measured by the absorbance at 280 nm prior to setting up crystallization experiments.
Initial crystallization screens were carried out using commercial sparse-matrix screens from Hampton Research (Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen 2 and Index) at 298 K by vapour diffusion in sitting drops (Table 2).
|
2.3. Data collection and processing
The crystals were transferred for ∼30 s into cryoprotecting solution (0.1 M bis-tris pH 6.5, 28% PEG 2000 MME, 15% glycerol) and were flash-cooled directly in a stream of N2 gas at 113 K prior to collecting diffraction data. X-ray diffraction data were collected at the Baylor College of Medicine core facility using a Rigaku HTC detector (Table 3). The X-ray source was a Rigaku FR-E+ SuperBright microfocus rotating-anode generator with VariMax HF optics. A data set was collected from a single crystal using the CrystalClear (d*TREK) package (Pflugrath, 1999) and was processed using MOSFLM (Leslie, 2006).
|
3. Results and discussion
The typical yield of LJL143 was 50 mg per litre of 42NQTH and 241NKTC, which may contribute to the almost 10 kDa increase in molecular mass. LJL143 crystals were grown using different polyethylene (PEG) as precipitants. The best diffracting crystals were obtained after 48 h in the conditions detailed in Table 2. These crystals are illustrated in Fig. 2(a). Diffraction images reveal visible diffraction spots beyond 2.6 Å resolution (Fig. 2b). The crystal belonged to the orthorhombic P212121, with approximate unit-cell parameters a = 57.5, b = 70.2, c = 79.5 Å (Table 3). Based on the estimated Matthews coefficient and solvent-content prediction (https://www.ruppweb.org/Mattprob), a monomer is expected in the (Matthews, 1968; Kantardjieff & Rupp, 2003). This corresponds to a unit-cell volume of 321 104 Å3 (with an asymmetric unit of 80 276 Å3), a Matthews coefficient of 2.39 Å3 Da−1 and an estimated solvent content of 48.5%.
supernatant. The resulting protein had an of 42 kDa. The predicted theoretical molecular mass of LJL143 is 33 594.92 Da. LJL143 has two predicted N-glycosylation sites atA BLAST analysis of LJL143 against the Protein Data Bank revealed no suitable homologues for The closest structural homologue, 2-hydroxyhepta-2,4-diene-1,7-dioate isomerase from Thermus thermophilus (PDB entry 2dfu; RIKEN Structural Genomics/Proteomics Initiative, unpublished work), shares only 21% sequence identity over a 26% query coverage. There are only ten S atoms out of a total of 4668 atoms, and our attempts at phase determination by single-wavelength using S atoms at the Cu Kα wavelength failed. Future studies will include other methods of experimental phase determination such as multi-wavelength phasing with selenomethionine-derivatized protein and heavy-atom derivatization for multiple (Ingram et al., 1956; Perutz, 1953; Harker, 1956; Hendrickson & Ogata, 1997). LJL143 and other salivary-gland proteins play key roles in the transmission of leishmaniasis. The structure of LJL143 will give key insights into the underlying mechanisms of this poorly characterized family of proteins.
Footnotes
‡These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs Hotez and Bottazzi for ongoing support. We also thank Dr Jesus Valenzuela for collaborating with us on the structural and functional studies of sandfly antigens. We thank the National School of Tropical Medicine at the Baylor College of Medicine for funding these studies.
References
Andrade, B. B., de Oliveira, C. I., Brodskyn, C. I., Barral, A. & Barral-Netto, M. (2007). Scand. J. Immunol. 66, 122–127. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Belkaid, Y., Kamhawi, S., Modi, G., Valenzuela, J., Noben-Trauth, N., Rowton, E., Ribeiro, J. & Sacks, D. L. (1998). J. Exp. Med. 188, 1941–1953. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bezerra, H. S. da S. & Teixeira, M. J. (2001). Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, 96, 349–351. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Collin, N., Gomes, R., Teixeira, C., Cheng, L., Laughinghouse, A., Ward, J. M., Elnaiem, D. E., Fischer, L., Valenzuela, J. G. & Kamhawi, S. (2009). PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000441. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Costa, D. J. et al. (2013). PLoS One, 8, e60535. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Gomes, R., Teixeira, C., Teixeira, M. J., Oliveira, F., Menezes, M. J., Silva, C., de Oliveira, C. I., Miranda, J. C., Elnaiem, D. E., Kamhawi, S., Valenzuela, J. G. & Brodskyn, C. I. (2008). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 7845–7850. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Harker, D. (1956). Adv. Biol. Med. Phys. 4, 1–22. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hendrickson, W. A. & Ogata, C. M. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 277, 494–522. CrossRef Google Scholar
Ingram, D. J. E., Gibson, J. F. & Perutz, M. F. (1956). Nature (London), 178, 906–908. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kantardjieff, K. A. & Rupp, B. (2003). Protein Sci. 12, 1865–1871. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Leslie, A. G. W. (2006). Acta Cryst. D62, 48–57. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Maltezou, H. C. (2008). Recent Pat. Anti-Infect. Drug Discov. 3, 192–198. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Mohamed-Ahmed, A. H., Brocchini, S. & Croft, S. L. (2012). Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 25, 695–702. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pavli, A. & Maltezou, H. C. (2010). Int. J. Infect. Dis. 14, e1032–e1039. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Perutz, M. F. (1953). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 141, 69–71. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pflugrath, J. W. (1999). Acta Cryst. D55, 1718–1725. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Teixeira, C. et al. (2010). PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4, e638. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Titus, R. G. & Ribeiro, J. M. (1988). Science, 239, 1306–1308. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. G., Belkaid, Y., Garfield, M. K., Mendez, S., Kamhawi, S., Rowton, E. D., Sacks, D. L. & Ribeiro, J. M. (2001). J. Exp. Med. 194, 331–342. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhan, B. et al. (2005). Infect. Immun. 73, 6903–6911. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.