research communications
Crystallization and crystallographic studies of kallistatin
aHongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital and Faculty of Basic Medicine, and Department of Pathophysiology, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, (Room 1006, Building 2, No 280, South Chongqing Road), Shanghai 200025, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: weizhq@gmail.com
Kallistatin is a serine protease inhibitor (serpin) which specifically inhibits human tissue kallikrein; however, its inhibitory activity is inhibited by heparin. In order to elucidate the underlying mechanism, recombinant human kallistatin was prepared in Escherichia coli and the protein was crystallized by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method. X-ray diffraction data were collected to 1.9 Å resolution. The crystals were found to belong to P61, with unit-cell parameters a = 113.51, b = 113.51, c = 76.17 Å. Initial analysis indicated that the crystallized kallistatin was in a relaxed conformation, with its reactive-centre loop inserted in the central β-sheet.
Keywords: kallistatin; tissue kallikrein; crystallization; serpins; heparin.
1. Introduction
Kallistatin, a member of the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) superfamily, specifically inhibits human tissue kallikrein (Zhou et al., 1992). Serpins are folded into a metastable conformation with a surface-exposed reactive-centre loop (Huber & Carrell, 1989; Gettins, 2002; Irving et al., 2000). Once the reactive loop has been recognized and cleaved by the target protease, serpins undergo a dramatic conformational change in which the reactive loop is incorporated into the middle of the central β-sheet with translocation and inactivation of the covalently linked protease (Huntington et al., 2000). This unique conformational change from a metastable to a hyperstable state, often termed a stressed-to-relaxed (S-to-R) conformational transition, is accompanied by a large free-energy change which is utilized to inhibit the protease (Huber & Carrell, 1989; Gettins, 2002).
Kallistatin is one of the heparin-binding serpins, which include antithrombin, protein C inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, heparin cofactor II and protease nexin I (Chen et al., 2001; Gettins, 2002; Rein et al., 2011; Patston et al., 2004). The ability of heparin to enhance the inhibitory activity of serpins has been well studied (Gettins, 2002; Li et al., 2004; Johnson & Huntington, 2003; Jin et al., 1997; Dementiev et al., 2004). For example, the binding of heparin to antithrombin increases its inhibition of thrombin or activated factor X by nearly 1000-fold. This is either through a template mechanism or an allosteric mechanism in which heparin binds to helix D of antithrombin (Li et al., 2004; Jin et al., 1997). Similarly, heparin can also accelerate the inhibition of activated protein C through binding to helix H of protein C inhibitor (Huntington & Li, 2009). Unexpectedly, it has been reported that heparin blocks the interaction between kallistatin and tissue kallikrein. The heparin-binding site has been proposed to be around helix H and strand 2 of β-sheet C of kallistatin (Chen et al., 2001). As this unique heparin-mediated inhibition on kallistatin is not well understood and the structure of kallistatin is not known, we have prepared and crystallized human kallistatin as the first step towards elucidating the heparin-mediated regulatory mechanism.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Macromolecule production
The kallistatin IMAGE cDNA clone was purchased from Geneservices and the coding sequence for amino acids 48–397 was amplified by PCR using gene-specific primers containing BamHI and HindIII sites (Table 1). The fragment was subsequently cloned into the pSumoO3 expression vector. The recombinant sequence was verified by DNA sequencing.
|
The construct contains a His-tagged Sumo3 at the N-terminus of kallistatin. The expression plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) competent cells. A single colony was used to inoculate 60 ml LB medium, which was incubated overnight at 37°C with shaking. Cultured cells were then transferred to 6 l LB medium and incubated for 4 h at 37°C with shaking, after which the temperature of the culture was decreased to 20°C and protein expression was induced with 0.25 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside for 20 h. Following induction, the bacteria were collected, resuspended and disrupted by sonication in 150 ml buffer A (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM imidazole). The bacterial cell lysate was subsequently centrifuged at 20 000g for 30 min at 4°C, after which the supernatant was applied onto a HisTrap Ni-Sepharose column (5 ml). The unbound bacterial proteins were washed from the column using 100 ml buffer A. The target protein was subsequently eluted from the column using a 20–200 mM imidazole gradient in buffer A. Fractions containing the fusion protein, based upon SDS–PAGE analysis, were pooled and then digested with SENP2 protease to remove the Sumo3 tag from the fusion protein and to generate recombinant kallistatin without the non-native sequence at its N-terminus. The mixture was dialyzed and loaded onto a HiTrap SP ion-exchange column. Kallistatin was eluted with a 0–1 M NaCl gradient in 10 mM MES pH 6.2. Peaks containing kallistatin were collected and concentrated before crystallization trials.
2.2. Crystallization
The initial conditions for crystallization were screened at 22°C by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method using screening kits from Hampton Research (Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen 2, Index HT, PEG/Ion, PEG/Ion 2, SaltRX, Natrix, MembFac and Crystal Screen Cryo) in MRC2 plates. Crystals were initially grown from a mixture of 200 nl protein solution (10 mg ml−1 in 10 mM MES pH 6.2, 0.15 M NaCl) and 200 nl precipitant solution equilibrated against 80 µl reservoir solution. Subsequent optimizations were performed using 24-well sitting-drop plates and the crystals grew to dimensions of 0.2 × 0.2 × 0.5 mm in two weeks. A summary of the crystallization is provided in Table 2.
|
2.3. Data collection and processing
Owing to the rapid evaporation of tert-butanol, the crystals float around in the drop and crack once the well is opened. A cryosolution consisting of 10% glycerol and 10% ethylene glycol was directly added to the drop and a small piece of crystal was picked up using a micro-loop and flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were collected on beamline BL17U at SSRF, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. The data set was indexed and processed with iMosflm (Battye et al., 2011) and scaled with AIMLESS from the CCP4 suite (Evans, 2011; Winn et al., 2011).
3. Results and discussion
In order to understand the molecular mechanism of kallistatin in regulating protease activity, we expressed recombinant human kallistatin as a fusion protein using an E. coli expression system. After Ni-Sepharose affinity-column purification, the fusion tag was cleaved with SENP2 protease and kallistatin was further purified on a cation-exchange column. As shown in Fig. 1, the Sumo3 tag eluted in fractions 9 and 10 and kallistatin eluted as two peaks (I and II). Proteins from both peaks were pooled and screened for crystallization. Stick-shaped crystals were obtained with protein from peak II after two weeks using 30% tert-butanol as precipitant (Fig. 2). These crystals readily diffracted to better than 2 Å resolution and were found to belong to P61, with unit-cell parameters a = 113.51, b = 113.51, c = 76.17 Å. Diffraction data statistics are shown in Table 3.
|
Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007). As serpins are known to adopt different conformations, models of protein C inhibitor (Huntington et al., 2003; Li et al., 2007) and thyroxine-binding globulin (Zhou et al., 2006), representing one relaxed and two stressed serpin conformations (∼47% sequence identity; PDB entries 1lq8 , 2ce0 and 2hi9 ), were selected as search models. A clear single solution was obtained from a search using PDB entry 1lq8 as the model with one copy of molecule in the indicating a solvent content of ∼60%. As PDB entry 1lq8 corresponds to the relaxed conformation of protein C inhibitor with its reactive loop cleaved and inserted into the central β-sheet (Huntington et al., 2003), this indicates that the crystallized kallistatin is also in a relaxed conformation. The electron-density map calculated from Phaser confirms that the reactive loop of kallistatin is incorporated into the central β-sheet A as a middle strand (Fig. 3). Therefore, kallistatin is likely to have undergone conformational changes to form the relaxed conformation during expression or during the subsequent purification and crystallization steps. Preliminary with REFMAC (Murshudov et al., 2011) using the model from Phaser gave an Rwork of 33% and an Rfree of 37%. Further and detailed characterization of the cleavage site are ongoing.
was performed withAcknowledgements
This work was supported by NSFC grants 31170724 and 31370727. We thank the staff from BL17U at SSRF Shanghai for help in data collection.
References
Battye, T. G. G., Kontogiannis, L., Johnson, O., Powell, H. R. & Leslie, A. G. W. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 271–281. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chen, V. C., Chao, L., Pimenta, D. C., Bledsoe, G., Juliano, L. & Chao, J. (2001). J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1276–1284. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Dementiev, A., Petitou, M., Herbert, J.-M. & Gettins, P. G. W. (2004). Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 863–867. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Evans, P. R. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 282–292. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gettins, P. G. W. (2002). Chem. Rev. 102, 4751–4804. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Huber, R. & Carrell, R. W. (1989). Biochemistry, 28, 8951–8966. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Huntington, J. A., Kjellberg, M. & Stenflo, J. (2003). Structure, 11, 205–215. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Huntington, J. A. & Li, W. (2009). Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66, 113–121. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Huntington, J. A., Read, R. J. & Carrell, R. W. (2000). Nature (London), 407, 923–926. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Irving, J. A., Pike, R. N., Lesk, A. M. & Whisstock, J. C. (2000). Genome Res. 10, 1845–1864. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Jin, L., Abrahams, J. P., Skinner, R., Petitou, M., Pike, R. N. & Carrell, R. W. (1997). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 14683–14688. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Johnson, D. J. & Huntington, J. A. (2003). Biochemistry, 42, 8712–8719. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Li, W., Adams, T. E., Kjellberg, M., Stenflo, J. & Huntington, J. A. (2007). J. Biol. Chem. 282, 13759–13768. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Li, W., Johnson, D. J., Esmon, C. T. & Huntington, J. A. (2004). Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 857–862. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Patston, P. A., Church, F. C. & Olson, S. T. (2004). Methods, 32, 93–109. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Rein, C. M., Desai, U. R. & Church, F. C. (2011). Methods Enzymol. 501, 105–137. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zhou, G. X., Chao, L. & Chao, J. (1992). J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25873–25880. PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, A., Wei, Z., Read, R. J. & Carrell, R. W. (2006). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 13321–13326. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.