research communications
The putative compatible solute-binding protein ProX from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv: biochemical characterization and crystallographic data
aInstitute of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Key Laboratory of Gansu Province for Urological Diseases, Clinical Center of Gansu Province for Nephrourology, Lanzhou 730000, People's Republic of China, and bMOE Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: erywzp@lzu.edu.cn, heyx@lzu.edu.cn
In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the proX gene encodes a putative compatible solute-binding protein (MtProX). However, it was found through sequence alignment that the MtProX protein has very different ligand-binding residues compared with other compatible solute-binding proteins, implying that MtProX may bind to ligands that are as yet uncharacterized. In this work, it was demonstrated that MtProX binds to polyphenols such as phloretin, monoacetylphloroglucinol and 2,4-dihydroxyacetophloroglucinol with dissociation constants between 20 and 70 µM. Crystals of MtProX were obtained using a precipitant consisting of 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, 25%(w/v) polyethylene glycol 3350. The crystals diffracted to 2.10 Å resolution and belonged to P43212, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 90.17, c = 161.92 Å, α = β = γ = 90.0°. Assuming the presence of two MtProX molecules in the the Matthews coefficient was calculated to be 2.74 Å3 Da−1, which corresponds to a solvent content of 55%.
1. Introduction
Osmoregulation plays an important role in niche adaptation in bacteria, and the most common strategy is to modulate the intracellular concentrations of osmotically active compounds, also known as compatible solutes, through transporters (Holtmann & Bremer, 2004). The compatible solutes, which include glycine betaine, ectoine, proline etc., are metabolically inert and do not interfere with cell physiology even at very high concentrations (Hoffmann et al., 2008). A subfamily of ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC transporters), which are usually multimeric and contain membrane-associated ATPase subunits, have been identified to be involved in osmoregulation by taking up diverse compatible solutes (Roesser & Müller, 2001). A common feature of these uptake systems is the presence of a substrate-binding protein (SBP) that is involved in initial recognition of the substrate and thus is responsible for the substrate specificity of the transporter (Du et al., 2011; Oswald et al., 2008). Upon binding to a specific substrate, the SBP usually undergoes an open-to-closed conformational change and docks onto the transmembrane subunit to release the substrate for transport across the membrane (Davidson et al., 2008).
In bacterial pathogens, transporters of compatible solutes have been characterized to play important roles in host infection. In Escherichia coli, it was identified that the proline/betaine transporter ProP is involved in colonization of mouse bladder (Bayer et al., 1999; Culham et al., 1998). In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which can proliferate by intracellular growth, the ABC transporter ProXVWZ was reported to import glycine betaine from host macrophages to maintain osmotic balance, and deletion of the proXVWZ operon led to impairment of initial survival and intracellular growth (Price et al., 2008). Within the proXVWZ operon, the proX gene encodes a putative substrate-binding protein, and a BLAST search against the PDB revealed that the M. tuberculosis ProX (MtProX) protein shares the highest sequence similarity (43%) with the YehZ protein from Brucella abortus (Herrou et al., 2017). However, previous studies indicated a very weak binding affinity (in the millimolar range) between YehZ and glycine betaine, and no interaction was detected between YehZ and other compatible solutes such as proline, choline, ectoine or carnitine (Herrou et al., 2017; Lang et al., 2015). Through sequence alignment, we found that MtProX also has very different ligand-binding residues compared with other quaternary ammonium osmoprotectant-binding proteins, implying that MtProX may bind to ligands that are as yet uncharacterized. In this work, we report the production of MtProX and the characterization of binding ligands, together with its crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction data.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Macromolecule production
The gene encoding the MtProX protein was synthesized (GENEWIZ) and cloned into a pET-28b-derived vector with an N-terminal 6×His tag. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Novagen). The cells were grown to an OD600 nm of 0.6–0.8 at 37°C, and the expression of recombinant protein was induced by 0.2 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside for 15 h at 16°C. The cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl. After 30 min of sonication and centrifugation at 12 000g for 25 min, the supernatant containing the soluble protein was collected and loaded onto Ni2+–nitrilotriacetate affinity resin (Ni–NTA, Qiagen) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl. The MtProX protein was eluted with 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole and further purified by gel filtration on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl. The peak fractions were collected and concentrated to 30 mg ml−1 for crystallization. The protein sample was stored at −80°C and the details of MtProX production are summarized in Table 1.
|
2.2. Intrinsic fluorescence-quenching assay
The interaction between MtProX and various compounds was determined by tryptophan fluorescence titration as described previously (Wu et al., 2016). Several different concentrations of compounds and 2 µM MtProX were prepared in Tris buffer pH 8.0. The fluorescence quenching was conducted in a cuvette with a 1 cm path-length cell. Intrinsic fluorescence spectra of MtProX were recorded using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, California, USA) at room temperature with excitation at 280 nm and emission between 300 and 400 nm. Tryptophan fluorescence spectra were collected before and after titration with different concentrations of compounds. We confirmed that titrating the buffer with the tested compounds produced negligible fluorescence changes under the same experimental conditions. The dissociation constants of the compounds and MtProX were determined by fitting the normalized fluorescence intensity at 340 nm.
2.3. Crystallization, data collection and processing
Crystals of MtProX were grown using the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method at 16°C by mixing 1 µl 30 mg ml−1 protein sample with an equal volume of reservoir solution consisting of 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, 25%(w/v) polyethylene glycol 6000. Crystals appeared in two weeks and grew to full size within one month. The details of crystallization are summarized in Table 2. The crystals were soaked in cryoprotectant (reservoir solution supplemented with 30% glycerol) and flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. X-ray data were collected at 100 K in a liquid-nitrogen stream using an IµS 3.0 microfocus source with a PHOTON II detector (Bruker) at Lanzhou University. All diffraction data were indexed, integrated and scaled with HKL-2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Data-collection statistics are summarized in Table 3.
|
|
3. Results and discussion
Sequence comparison of MtProX with those of previously solved homologous structures revealed that MtProX does not possess the conserved aromatic residues that are essential to accommodate the trimethylammonium head moiety of compatible solute molecules (Fig. 1a). To investigate its binding ligands in vitro, MtProX was expressed in E. coli BL21 with an N-terminal 6×His tag to facilitate affinity purification. After gel filtration, the purity of MtProX was checked by SDS–PAGE (Fig. 1b). Using a fluorescence-quenching assay, we found that no interaction was detected between MtProX and betaine, choline or carnitine (data not shown). Polyphenols are important that are mainly produced by plants and can be used as a sole carbon source by certain bacteria (Gorny et al., 1992). Using BLAST (Altschul et al., 1990), we found an M. tuberculosis gene cluster (Rv1714–Rv1716) that shares ∼40% sequence identity with the gene cluster characterized to be involved in polyphenol degradation in Clostridium sp. (NCBI reference sequences WP_021630531.1, WP_007491232.1 and WP_021630532.1; Conradt et al., 2016), suggesting that M. tuberculosis may be capable of metabolizing certain polyphenols. Indeed, we found that polyphenols such as phloretin, monoacetylphloroglucinol (MAPG) and 2,4-dihydroxyacetophloroglucinol (DAPG) could bind to MtProX with dissociation constants of between 20 and 70 µM (Fig. 2). Although the physiological ligands of MtProX are currently unknown, our data suggest that MtProX might be involved in the import of polyphenols or analogous compounds in the living environment of M. tuberculosis.
To gain structural insight into the ligand-binding mechanism of MtProX, we also crystallized and obtained high-quality protein crystals of MtProX. The crystals of MtProX were obtained using a precipitant consisting of 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, 25%(w/v) polyethylene glycol 3350 (Fig. 3a). A complete diffraction data set was collected to 2.10 Å resolution (Fig. 3b) and the data-collection statistics are listed in Table 1. The crystal belonged to P43212, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 90.17, c = 161.92 Å, α = β = γ = 90°. Assuming the presence of two MtProX molecules in the the Matthews coefficient was calculated to be 2.74 Å3 Da−1, which corresponds to a solvent content of 55%. The structure solution was found by the method with MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010), using the structure of YehZ from B. abortus (PDB entry 5teu; 43% sequence similarity) as the search model. The initial R factor and Rfree were 42.1 and 46.9%, respectively. Structure is in progress.
Funding information
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 31770535) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities from Lanzhou University (grant No. lzujbky-2016-85). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish or the preparation of the manuscript.
References
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. (1990). J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Bayer, A. S., Coulter, S. N., Stover, C. K. & Schwan, W. R. (1999). Infect. Immun. 67, 740–744. CAS Google Scholar
Conradt, D., Hermann, B., Gerhardt, S., Einsle, O. & Müller, M. (2016). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 15531–15534. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Culham, D. E., Dalgado, C., Gyles, C. L., Mamelak, D., MacLellan, S. & Wood, J. M. (1998). Microbiology, 144, 91–102. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Davidson, A. L., Dassa, E., Orelle, C. & Chen, J. (2008). Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 72, 317–364. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Du, Y., Shi, W.-W., He, Y.-X., Yang, Y.-H., Zhou, C.-Z. & Chen, Y. (2011). Biochem. J. 436, 283–289. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gorny, N., Wahl, G., Brune, A. & Schink, B. (1992). Arch. Microbiol. 158, 48–53. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Herrou, J., Willett, J. W., Czyż, D. M., Babnigg, G., Kim, Y. & Crosson, S. (2017). J. Bacteriol. 199, e00746-16. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T., Boiangiu, C., Moses, S. & Bremer, E. (2008). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 2454–2460. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Holtmann, G. & Bremer, E. (2004). J. Bacteriol. 186, 1683–1693. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lang, S., Cressatti, M., Mendoza, K. E., Coumoundouros, C. N., Plater, S. M., Culham, D. E., Kimber, M. S. & Wood, J. M. (2015). Biochemistry, 54, 5735–5747. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Oswald, C., Smits, S. H., Höing, M., Sohn-Bösser, L., Dupont, L., Le Rudulier, D., Schmitt, L. & Bremer, E. (2008). J. Biol. Chem. 283, 32848–32859. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Price, C. T., Bukka, A., Cynamon, M. & Graham, J. E. (2008). J. Bacteriol. 190, 3955–3961. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Roesser, M. & Müller, V. (2001). Environ. Microbiol. 3, 743–754. CAS Google Scholar
Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 22–25. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wu, D., Tao, X., Chen, Z.-P., Han, J.-T., Jia, W. J., Zhu, N., Li, X., Wang, Z. & He, Y.-X. (2016). J. Hazard. Mater. 307, 193–201. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.