research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X

Structure of recombinant Thermoascus aurantiacus xylanase TaXyn10 with an authentic N-terminal pyroglutamate

crossmark logo

aMacromolecular Crystallography, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by M. Adams, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (Received 28 May 2026; accepted 1 September 2026; online 22 September 2026)

This article is part of a special issue celebrating early career researchers in structural science.

The thermostable GH10 xylanase from Thermoascus aurantiacus (TaXyn10) is an industrially relevant enzyme whose native structure contains an N-terminal pyroglutamate (PCA) modification. Recombinant production of proteins containing an N-terminal PCA is often hindered by purification strategies that disrupt the authentic N-terminus. Here, we report the 1.1 Å resolution crystal structure of TaXyn10 recombinantly produced in Escherichia coli and purified using a split-intein-based system. The structure closely resembles that of the native protein. Electron-density maps support the presence of an intact N-terminal PCA, with partial occupancy consistent with spontaneous cyclization of the exposed N-terminal glutamine after intein cleavage. These results demonstrate that split-intein-based purification enables recovery of the native mature state of TaXyn10 and can preserve physiologically relevant N-terminal PCA formation in recombinant protein produced in E. coli.

1. Introduction

Xylanases are a class of enzymes found in a broad range of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi. They hydrolyze xylan, a hemicellulose polymer found in the cell walls of plants that is one of the most abundant biopolymers on Earth. The backbone of xylan consists of β-1,4-linked xylose residues that can be further decorated with substituents such as arabinofuranose. Their ability to cleave this glycosidic bond makes xylanases important in industrial applications ranging from bio-bleaching in paper manufacturing to biofuel production (Pavlova et al., 2026View full citation). They can be divided into exoxylanases, which cleave from the end of xylan chains, and endoxylanases, which cleave internal bonds within the chain. Among the latter, GH10 and GH11 xylanases are widely used in industry. Members of the GH10 family are characterized by a broader substrate specificity, allowing them to degrade substituted xylans commonly found in plants and making them highly useful for the breakdown of plant biomass (Pavlova et al., 2026View full citation).

In addition to their functional importance, GH10 xylanases have been extensively characterized structurally, and crystal structures of bacterial and fungal xylanases have provided insight into substrate binding and catalysis. One example of this is the set of structures of the GH10 family endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the thermophilic ascomycete Thermoascus aurantiacus (TaXyn10). TaXyn10 is a thermostable enzyme that retains activity at temperatures as high as 80°C (Tan et al., 1987View full citation). Following secretion signal peptide cleavage, the mature ectodomain is a 302-amino-acid xylanase that adopts a typical (β/α)8-triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) barrel fold, consisting of eight α-helices and eight β-strands that form a barrel-like structure (Natesh et al., 1999View full citation; Lo Leggio et al., 1999View full citation). Early structural studies have shown that the active site consists of two glutamate residues that are located at the C-terminal end of the TIM barrel, and have proposed structural elements such as tight hydrophobic packing, salt bridges and a disulfide bond as important factors for the thermostability of TaXyn10 (Natesh et al., 1999View full citation). Later studies revealed that substrate binding by TaXyn10 involves the stabilization of flexible residues that surround the active site and that sugar decorations, such as arabinofuranose, attached to the xylan backbone can increase the affinity of TaXyn10 towards such decorated substrates (Lo Leggio et al., 2001View full citation; Vardakou et al., 2005View full citation).

Structural studies have also shown that TaXyn10 has a pyroglutamate (PCA) at its N-terminus (Natesh et al., 2003View full citation, 1999View full citation; Lo Leggio et al., 1999View full citation, 2001View full citation), a post-translational modification that occurs in animals, plants and fungi but is also found in proteins from prokaryotes (Bochtler et al., 2018View full citation). PCA forms through the intramolecular cyclization of an N-terminal glutamine or, in rarer cases, glutamic acid, in which the α-amino group attacks the side-chain amide carbonyl, leading to the formation of a five-membered lactam ring. This reaction can occur spontaneously under physiological conditions and is significantly faster for glutamine than for glutamic acid (Schilling et al., 2008View full citation). In addition, in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, this cyclization is often mediated by glutaminyl cyclases, enzymes predominantly located in the secretory pathway that drastically increase the rate of PCA cyclization compared with the spontaneous reaction (Seifert et al., 2009View full citation; Xu et al., 2021View full citation). N-terminal PCA has numerous functions, including protection from proteolytic degradation by aminopeptidases, stabilization of secondary structures or contributing to the active conformation of proteins (Hinke et al., 2000View full citation; Van Coillie et al., 1998View full citation; Lou et al., 2006View full citation). In addition, PCA can also stabilize a protein and enhance its thermostability, examples of which include lignocellulolytic enzymes isolated from fungi (Wu et al., 2017View full citation), although for TaXyn10 such a stabilizing effect of PCA has not been shown to date.

This variety of functions highlights the importance of PCA, and recombinant production strategies for proteins with naturally occurring N-terminal PCA, such as TaXyn10, need to be designed to allow its formation. However, N-terminal sequences such as an uncleaved starter methionine or residues left from the cleavage of purification tags with commonly used enzymes such as Tobacco etch virus or PreScission protease block a potential N-terminal glutamine or glutamic acid, thereby preventing PCA cyclization. One approach to circumvent this problem is the use of self-cleaving tags which generate an intact native N-terminus after cleavage, thereby permitting PCA formation.

Here, we report the 1.1 Å resolution crystal structure of TaXyn10, recombinantly produced in Escherichia coli and purified using a self-cleaving, split-intein-based system. We show that TaXyn10 produced using this system preserves the native mature structural state and contains an N-terminal PCA.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Macromolecule production

The gene encoding TaXyn10 (residues 27–328, GenBank Accession No. AAF24127.1) with an N-terminal Protein Select split-intein affinity tag was synthesized and codon-optimized for expression in E. coli by GeneArt (Life Technologies; see Table 1[link]). The gene was cloned into the pET-15b expression vector between the NcoI and XhoI restriction sites. TaXyn10 was recombinantly produced in SHuffle T7 E. coli cells (New England Biolabs) grown in Terrific Broth medium at 30°C. Protein expression was induced when the cells reached an optical density (OD600) of 0.6 by the addition of isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. After induction, the temperature was lowered to 18°C and the cells were further incubated for 16 h. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in buffer consisting of 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0 and lysed by sonication. After an additional centrifugation step, the supernatant was loaded onto a Protein Select column (Cytiva), incubated for 24 h at 20°C for tag cleavage and eluted with elution buffer consisting of 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0. Since only a small fraction of the protein was cleaved after this first incubation, as determined by molecular-weight shift in SDS–PAGE, TaXyn10 was further purified by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a Superdex S75 16/60 column (Cytiva) equilibrated with SEC buffer consisting of 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0. Fractions containing pure TaXyn10 were then pooled, loaded onto a Protein Select column equilibrated with SEC buffer and incubated for 48 h at 20°C for tag cleavage. The protein was eluted with SEC buffer and tag cleavage was verified by SDS–PAGE. Fractions containing pure TaXyn10 were pooled, concentrated to 22.19 mg ml−1, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.

Table 1
Macromolecule-production information

Source organism Thermoascus aurantiacus
DNA source Synthetic
Expression vector pET-15b
Expression host Escherichia coli
Complete amino-acid sequence of the construct produced VKIVSRKSLGVQNVYDIGVEKDHNFLLANGLIASNQ†AAQSVDQLIKARGKVYFGVATDQNRLTTGKNAAIIQADFGQVTPENSMKWDATEPSQGNFNFAGADYLVNWAQQNGKLIRGHTLVWHSQLPSWVSSITDKNTLTNVMKNHITTLMTRYKGKIRAWDVVNEAFNEDGSLRQTVFLNVIGEDYIPIAFQTARAADPNAKLYINDYNLDSASYPKTQAIVNRVKQWRAAGVPIDGIGSQTHLSAGQGAGVLQALPLLASAGTPEVAITELDVAGASPTDYVNVVNACLNVQSCVGITVWGVADPDSWRASTTPLLFDGNFNPKPAYNAIVQDLQ
†N-terminal glutamine after split-intein tag cleavage.

2.2. Crystallization

Purified TaXyn10 was screened for crystallization at 293 K using a grid screen based on earlier experiments with a differently tagged TaXyn10 construct recombinantly produced in E. coli. By screening the JCSG Core Suite, these experiments identified MES as a suitable buffer and ammonium sulfate as a suitable precipitant (Schnapka, 2019View full citation). To establish optimized crystallization conditions for TaXyn10 purified with the split-intein-based system used here, the pH of MES was varied in steps of 0.5 between 5.7 and 6.7 and the ammonium sulfate concentration was varied in 0.2 M steps from 1.0 to 2.4 M. Plate-like crystals grew in 100 mM MES pH 6.7, 1.2 M ammonium sulfate after one week. These crystals were harvested, transferred into reservoir solution containing 20%(v/v) glycerol as a cryoprotectant and flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen for storage. Crystallization conditions are summarized in Table 2[link].

Table 2
Crystallization

Method Vapour diffusion, sitting drop
Plate type 48-well plate
Temperature (K) 293
Protein concentration (mg ml−1) 22.19
Buffer composition of protein solution 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0
Composition of reservoir solution 100 mM MES pH 6.7, 1.2 M ammonium sulfate
Volume and ratio of drop 0.5 µl protein solution + 0.5 µl reservoir solution
Volume of reservoir (µl) 200

2.3. Data collection and processing

Data were collected on the BESSY II macromolecular crystallography beamline BL14.1 (Mueller et al., 2012View full citation, 2015View full citation, 2025View full citation) at a wavelength of 0.918 Å using an MD2 microdiffractometer and a PILATUS3 X 6M detector. Samples were cooled to 100 K in a nitrogen gas stream. The data were processed with XDSAPP (Sparta et al., 2016View full citation) and AIMLESS (Agirre et al., 2023View full citation). The data-collection and processing statistics are summarized in Table 3[link]. The crystal displayed a relatively low solvent content of 35.1% (Matthews coefficient VM = 1.92 Å3 Da−1), which is consistent with the low overall Wilson B factor of 4.3 Å2 obtained during data processing with AIMLESS.

Table 3
Data collection and processing

Values in parentheses are for the outer shell.

Diffraction source BL14.1, BESSY, Berlin
Wavelength (Å) 0.918
Temperature (K) 100
Detector PILATUS3 X 6M
Crystal-to-detector distance (mm) 150
Rotation range per image (°) 0.1
Total rotation range (°) 360
Exposure time per image (s) 0.1
Space group P21
a, b, c (Å) 45.53, 58.35, 50.71
α, β, γ (°) 90.00, 110.79, 90.00
Mosaicity (°) 0.25
Resolution range (Å) 42.57–1.11 (1.13–1.11)
Total No. of reflections 641004
No. of unique reflections 97755
Completeness (%) 99.9 (99.7)
Multiplicity 6.6 (6.5)
〈I/σ(I)〉 9.0 (1.9†)
CC1/2 99.7 (47.7)
Rr.i.m. (%) 0.083 (0.416)
Overall B factor from Wilson plot (Å2) 4.3
†Meaningful signal, as judged by CC1/2, was observable below a mean I/σ(I) of 2.0 in the outer shell. The resolution at which mean I/σ(I) falls below 2.0 is 1.14 Å.

2.4. Structure solution and refinement

The crystal structure of TaXyn10 recombinantly produced in E. coli was solved by molecular replacement with Phaser-MR (McCoy et al., 2007View full citation), using the crystal structure of TaXyn10 isolated from T. aurantiacus (PDB entry 1gok; Lo Leggio et al., 2001View full citation) with its N-terminal PCA residue removed as an input model. The model was rebuilt by iterative cycles of model building in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010View full citation) and refinement with REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011View full citation), using individual anisotropic B-factor refinement in combination with automatically generated translation/libration/screw restraints and H atoms added at riding positions during refinement. The occupancy of PCA2 or Gln2 was refined independently using REFMAC5, without applying occupancy restraints or constraints. The refinement statistics are shown in Table 4[link]. A composite omit electron-density map was generated with phenix.refine (Liebschner et al., 2019View full citation) using a model in which the N-terminal PCA2 had been removed and which was subsequently refined with REFMAC5 as described above. Real-space R values and real-space correlation coefficients were calculated using EDSTAT (Tickle, 2012View full citation). Residual peak heights were determined with Coot. All structure figures were generated with PyMOL (Schrödinger).

Table 4
Structure refinement

Resolution range (Å) 24.86–1.11
No. of reflections, working set 97727
No. of reflections, test set 4838
Rcryst 0.155
Rfree 0.171
No. of non-H atoms
 Protein 2399
 Ligands 36
 Water 354
 Total 2789
R.m.s.d., bond lengths (Å) 0.011
R.m.s.d., angles (°) 1.9
Average B factors (Å2)
 Protein 7.3
 Ligands 11.4
 Water 22.5
Ramachandran plot
 Most favoured (%) 98
 Allowed (%) 2
 Outliers (%) 0

3. Results

3.1. Structure of TaXyn10 produced in E. coli

To facilitate the formation of the single disulfide bond in TaXyn10, the protein was recombinantly produced in T7 SHuffle E. coli cells. After purification via split-intein-based affinity chromatography, the protein was further purified by size-exclusion chromatography, followed by tag cleavage. Complete tag cleavage was confirmed by size shift on SDS–PAGE. Recombinant TaXyn10 crystallized in space group P21, and crystals diffracted to 1.11 Å resolution with one copy of TaXyn10 in the asymmetric unit, yielding a Matthews coefficient of 1.92 Å3 Da−1, corresponding to a solvent content of 35.1%.

The overall structure of recombinant TaXyn10 is very similar to that of the protein isolated from T. aurantiacus, adopting the typical TIM-barrel fold (Fig. 1[link]), with an r.m.s.d. of 0.26 Å over 297 Cα atoms and an r.m.s.d. of 0.65 Å over 2330 protein atoms compared with the high-resolution structure of TaXyn10 (PDB entry 1i1w; Natesh et al., 2003View full citation), excluding a flexible loop comprising residues 276–280 in recombinant TaXyn10. Features that are thought to contribute to the thermostability of TaXyn10, such as the disulfide bond and an extensive salt-bridge network that includes a buried salt bridge between Arg150 and Glu258 (Natesh et al., 2003View full citation, 1999View full citation; Lo Leggio et al., 2001View full citation), were also observed. In contrast to earlier structures, residues 302–305 that form part of the eight βα-loop can be modelled in two alternate conformations, with elevated B factors relative to the rest of the structure, indicating flexibility (Fig. 1[link]). Of note, a sulfate ion from the crystallization solution interacts with this loop in both conformations, which could have a stabilizing effect that captures these distinct conformations. Interestingly, this part of the loop is directly adjacent to Trp301, which in unliganded structures has been proposed to be more flexible and becomes ordered upon substrate binding (Lo Leggio et al., 2001View full citation). The conformational heterogeneity observed here is therefore consistent with a model of a flexible region surrounding Trp301 that becomes stabilized upon ligand binding.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Structure of recombinantly produced TaXyn10. TaXyn10 is shown as a cartoon in rainbow representation, with the N-terminus coloured blue and the C-terminus coloured red. The inset shows the two modelled conformations for residues 276–280, coloured by B factors, with blue representing the minimum and red representing the maximum B factor for the protein chain. Trp275 and other residues important for substrate binding are shown in stick representation and a sulfate ion next to the flexible loop is shown in stick representation and coloured by element.

Furthermore, a glycerol molecule from the cryoprotectant solution was bound in subsite −1 of the active site, forming hydrogen bonds to residues Lys50, His83, Asn130 and Glu237 (Fig. 2[link]a). This glycerol molecule partly mimics the interactions observed between TaXyn10 and the substrate xylobiose (Lo Leggio et al., 2001View full citation; Fig. 2[link]b) or xylobiose linked to feruloyl-arabinose (Vardakou et al., 2005View full citation) in this subsite. However, xylobiose also forms hydrogen bonds to Gln207 and His209 (Fig. 2[link]b), whereas the feruloyl-arabinose-linked xylobiose also contacts Gln207 (Fig. 2[link]b). None of these interactions are observed in the glycerol-bound structure of TaXyn10. In addition, glycerol binding in subsite −1 does not lead to any conformational changes for the catalytic glutamates Glu130 and Glu237 (Fig. 2[link]d).

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Structure of TaXyn10 subsite −1 bound to (a) glycerol, (b) xylobiose (PDB entry 1gor) or (c) xylobiose linked to feruloyl-arabinose (FAX2; PDB entry 2bnj). TaXyn10 is shown as a cartoon and coloured grey, interacting residues and the bound molecules are shown as sticks, and hydrogen bonds are indicated as yellow dotted lines. Glycerol is coloured green, xylobiose blue and FAX2 magenta. For the glycerol molecule, the 2mFo − DFc density contoured at 1.0s is shown as blue mesh. (d) An overlay of subsite −1 for TaXyn10 bound to glycerol, xylobiose or FAX2. Glycerol-, xylobiose- and FAX2-bound TaXyn10 are shown in grey, blue and magenta, respectively. The catalytic residues Glu130 and Glu237 are shown as sticks.

3.2. Spontaneous N-terminal PCA formation in recombinantly produced TaXyn10

Refinement of the TaXyn10 model with an N-terminal glutamine resulted in positive difference electron density, indicating that the N-terminal density cannot be explained by glutamine alone (Fig. 3[link]a). Inspection of the 2mFo − DFc electron density around this N-terminal glutamine indicated a ring-like structure into which PCA could be modelled (Fig. 3[link]b). Of note, the occupancy of PCA refined to 0.64, with a B factor of 12.85, which is similar to the subsequent alanine residues Ala3 and Ala4, which have B factors of 13.07 and 13.68 Å2, respectively. This partial occupancy is consistent with incomplete conversion of the N-terminal glutamine to PCA after cleavage of the tag. Indeed, independent refinement of a model with the N-terminal glutamine at full occupancy and a model with PCA with an occupancy of 0.64 showed that a glutamine at full occupancy leads to a higher real-space R value (0.218 versus 0.112) and a lower real-space correlation coefficient (0.70 versus 0.85) as well as stronger positive and negative mFo − DFc difference-density peaks around the residue. The N-terminal 2mFo − DFc density is only clearly visible when contoured at 1σ, which can partly be explained by the fact that the N-terminus points towards a solvent channel, resulting in higher flexibility as indicated by elevated B factors of the N-terminal residues compared with the rest of the model (Fig. 3[link]c). Furthermore, a composite omit electron-density map calculated for a model which was refined without the N-terminal PCA showed weak ring-like electron density at the N-terminus (Fig. 3[link]d) that is consistent with a PCA moiety, providing additional support for the interpretation of the N-terminal residue as PCA.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Electron density around the N-terminal PCA in recombinant TaXyn10, calculated after final refinement of the model. (a) Shown are the 2mFo − DFc electron-density maps (blue mesh) contoured at 1.0σ and the mFo − DFc difference electron-density maps (green and red mesh) contoured at 3.0σ around the N-terminal residue modelled as Gln. (b) 2mFo − DFc electron-density maps (blue mesh) contoured at 1.0σ and mFo − DFc difference electron-density maps (green and red mesh) contoured at 3.0σ around the N-terminal residue modelled as PCA. (c) TaXyn10 shown as a cartoon, coloured by B factor with blue representing the minimum and red representing the maximum B factor for the protein chain. The four N-terminal residues, including PCA2, are shown in ball-and-stick representation. Symmetry mates are shown as grey cartoons. (d) 2mFo − DFc composite omit electron-density map (blue mesh) contoured at 0.7σ around the N-terminal PCA.

4. Discussion

Here, we report the X-ray crystallographic structure of TaXyn10 recombinantly produced in E. coli and identify the presence of an N-terminal PCA. This is the first structural study on recombinantly produced TaXyn10, and the low r.m.s.d. to the structure of protein isolated from native sources (Natesh et al., 2003View full citation) shows that expression of TaXyn10 in the oxidizing cytoplasm of SHuffle T7 E. coli, which promotes disulfide-bond formation, preserves the overall native fold. While the oxidizing environment could influence protein folding, the close structural agreement indicates that it does not substantially alter the overall structure of TaXyn10. Importantly, the structure obtained here also contains the N-terminal PCA, providing structural evidence for PCA formation in recombinantly produced TaXyn10. N-terminal PCA formation is associated with enhanced thermal and proteolytic stability in industrially relevant lignocellulolytic enzymes (Wu et al., 2017View full citation), such as the xylanase studied here. For cyclization to PCA, the N-terminal glutamine or glutamic acid needs to be freely available, which often is not the case for proteins produced in E. coli due to N-terminal residues left over from purification-tag cleavage or incomplete removal of the N-terminal methionine. Our results indicate that the strategy to use a self-cleaving split-intein-based system for purification facilitates PCA formation, which can be relevant to enhance the stability of recombinantly produced proteins such as TaXyn10. Since the N-terminal glutamine is blocked by the split-intein tag before cleavage, the PCA observed in the structure presented here has likely formed spontaneously. This is further supported by the partial occupancy of PCA, which could indicate that a fraction of the molecules in the crystal retain the N-terminal glutamine. Further biochemical experiments could establish the time-course of this N-terminal PCA formation and determine whether a longer incubation after tag cleavage could result in a higher proportion of N-terminal PCA. Alternatively, expression or purification strategies that use glutaminyl cyclases could result in higher cyclization rates.

In addition, TaXyn10 produced in E. coli using this split-intein-based system crystallized within a week and forms relatively robust plate-like crystals. These properties, together with the spontaneous formation of an N-terminal PCA modification that is readily observable in the electron density, make TaXyn10 an attractive model system for practical courses in X-ray crystallography, as it combines straight­forward crystallization behaviour with an instructive example for analysing a post-translational modification and the concept of partial occupancy.

Supporting information


Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the beamline staff of beamline BL14.1, the staff at the HZB MX biolaboratory and access to the beamlines at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie through the Joint MX Berlin MX-Laboratory. We would to thank Helena Tabermann and Evelyn Schnapka for their contributions during the early stages of the project. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data availability

The structure of recombinant TaXyn10 has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 31ct.

References

Return to citationAgirre, J., Atanasova, M., Bagdonas, H., Ballard, C. B., Baslé, A., Beilsten-Edmands, J., Borges, R. J., Brown, D. G., Burgos-Mármol, J. J., Berrisford, J. M., Bond, P. S., Caballero, I., Catapano, L., Chojnowski, G., Cook, A. G., Cowtan, K. D., Croll, T. I., Debreczeni, J. É., Devenish, N. E., Dodson, E. J., Drevon, T. R., Emsley, P., Evans, G., Evans, P. R., Fando, M., Foadi, J., Fuentes-Montero, L., Garman, E. F., Gerstel, M., Gildea, R. J., Hatti, K., Hekkelman, M. L., Heuser, P., Hoh, S. W., Hough, M. A., Jenkins, H. T., Jiménez, E., Joosten, R. P., Keegan, R. M., Keep, N., Krissinel, E. B., Kolenko, P., Kovalevskiy, O., Lamzin, V. S., Lawson, D. M., Lebedev, A. A., Leslie, A. G. W., Lohkamp, B., Long, F., Malý, M., McCoy, A. J., McNicholas, S. J., Medina, A., Millán, C., Murray, J. W., Murshudov, G. N., Nicholls, R. A., Noble, M. E. M., Oeffner, R., Pannu, N. S., Parkhurst, J. M., Pearce, N., Pereira, J., Perrakis, A., Powell, H. R., Read, R. J., Rigden, D. J., Rochira, W., Sammito, M., Sánchez Rodríguez, F., Sheldrick, G. M., Shelley, K. L., Simkovic, F., Simpkin, A. J., Skubak, P., Sobolev, E., Steiner, R. A., Stevenson, K., Tews, I., Thomas, J. M. H., Thorn, A., Valls, J. T., Uski, V., Usón, I., Vagin, A., Velankar, S., Vollmar, M., Walden, H., Waterman, D., Wilson, K. S., Winn, M. D., Winter, G., Wojdyr, M. & Yamashita, K. (2023). Acta Cryst. D79, 449–461.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationBochtler, M., Mizgalska, D., Veillard, F., Nowak, M. L., Houston, J., Veith, P., Reynolds, E. C. & Potempa, J. (2018). Front. Microbiol. 9, 230.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationEmsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHinke, S. A., Pospisilik, J. A., Demuth, H.-U., Mannhart, S., Kühn-Wache, K., Hoffmann, T., Nishimura, E., Pederson, R. A. & McIntosh, C. H. S. (2000). J. Biol. Chem. 275, 3827–3834.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLiebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., Moriarty, N. W., Oeffner, R. D., Poon, B. K., Prisant, M. G., Read, R. J., Richardson, J. S., Richardson, D. C., Sammito, M. D., Sobolev, O. V., Stockwell, D. H., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A. G., Videau, L. L., Williams, C. J. & Adams, P. D. (2019). Acta Cryst. D75, 861–877.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationLo Leggio, L., Kalogiannis, S., Bhat, M. K. & Pickersgill, R. W. (1999). Proteins, 36, 295–306.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLo Leggio, L., Kalogiannis, S., Eckert, K., Teixeira, S. C. M., Bhat, M. K., Andrei, C., Pickersgill, R. W. & Larsen, S. (2001). FEBS Lett. 509, 303–308.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLou, Y.-C., Huang, Y.-C., Pan, Y.-R., Chen, C. & Liao, Y.-D. (2006). J. Mol. Biol. 355, 409–421.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMcCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMueller, U., Barthel, T., Benz, L. S., Bon, V., Crosskey, T., Genter Dieguez, C., Förster, R., Gless, C., Hauß, T., Heinemann, U., Hellmig, M., James, D., Lennartz, F., Oelker, M., Ovsyannikov, R., Singh, P., Wahl, M. C., Weber, G. & Weiss, M. S. (2025). J. Synchrotron Rad. 32, 766–778.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMueller, U., Darowski, N., Fuchs, M. R., Förster, R., Hellmig, M., Paithankar, K. S., Pühringer, S., Steffien, M., Zocher, G. & Weiss, M. S. (2012). J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 442–449.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMueller, U., Förster, R., Hellmig, M., Huschmann, F. U., Kastner, A., Malecki, P., Pühringer, S., Röwer, M., Sparta, K., Steffien, M., Ühlein, M., Wilk, P. & Weiss, M. S. (2015). Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 130, 141.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationMurshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationNatesh, R., Bhanumoorthy, P., Vithayathil, P. J., Sekar, K., Ramakumar, S. & Viswamitra, M. A. (1999). J. Mol. Biol. 288, 999–1012.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationNatesh, R., Manikandan, K., Bhanumoorthy, P., Viswamitra, M. A. & Ramakumar, S. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 105–117.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationPavlova, E. Y., Chesnokov, D. O., Slynko, N. M., Zadorozhny, A. V., Uvarova, Y. E., Khlebodarova, T. M., Vasilieva, A. R., Shipova, A. A., Bogacheva, N. V., Shlyakhtun, V. N., Korzhuk, A. V., Bukatich, E. Y. & Peltek, S. E. (2026). Microorganisms, 14, 127.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSchilling, S., Wasternack, C. & Demuth, H.-U. (2008). Biol. Chem. 389, 983–991.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSchnapka, E. (2019). MSc thesis. FU Berlin, Germany.  Google Scholar
Return to citationSeifert, F., Schulz, K., Koch, B., Manhart, S., Demuth, H.-U. & Schilling, S. (2009). Biochemistry, 48, 11831–11833.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSparta, K. M., Krug, M., Heinemann, U., Mueller, U. & Weiss, M. S. (2016). J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 1085–1092.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationTan, L. U. L., Mayers, P. & Saddler, J. N. (1987). Can. J. Microbiol. 33, 689–692.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationTickle, I. J. (2012). Acta Cryst. D68, 454–467.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationVan Coillie, E., Proost, P., Van Aelst, I., Struyf, S., Polfliet, M., De Meester, I., Harvey, D. J., Van Damme, J. & Opdenakker, G. (1998). Biochemistry, 37, 12672–12680.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationVardakou, M., Flint, J., Christakopoulos, P., Lewis, R. J., Gilbert, H. J. & Murray, J. W. (2005). J. Mol. Biol. 352, 1060–1067.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWu, V. W., Dana, C. M., Iavarone, A. T., Clark, D. S. & Glass, N. L. (2017). mBio, 8, e02231-16.  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationXu, C., Wang, Y. & Wu, H. (2021). J. Med. Chem. 64, 6549–6565.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X