research communications
accessStructure of recombinant Thermoascus aurantiacus xylanase TaXyn10 with an authentic N-terminal pyroglutamate
aMacromolecular Crystallography, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
This article is part of a special issue celebrating early career researchers in structural science.
The thermostable GH10 xylanase from Thermoascus aurantiacus (TaXyn10) is an industrially relevant enzyme whose native structure contains an N-terminal pyroglutamate (PCA) modification. Recombinant production of proteins containing an N-terminal PCA is often hindered by purification strategies that disrupt the authentic N-terminus. Here, we report the 1.1 Å resolution crystal structure of TaXyn10 recombinantly produced in Escherichia coli and purified using a split-intein-based system. The structure closely resembles that of the native protein. Electron-density maps support the presence of an intact N-terminal PCA, with partial occupancy consistent with spontaneous cyclization of the exposed N-terminal glutamine after intein cleavage. These results demonstrate that split-intein-based purification enables recovery of the native mature state of TaXyn10 and can preserve physiologically relevant N-terminal PCA formation in recombinant protein produced in E. coli.
PDB reference: Thermoascus aurantiacus xylanase TaXyn10, 31ct
1. Introduction
Xylanases are a class of enzymes found in a broad range of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi. They hydrolyze xylan, a hemicellulose polymer found in the cell walls of plants that is one of the most abundant biopolymers on Earth. The backbone of xylan consists of β-1,4-linked xylose residues that can be further decorated with substituents such as arabinofuranose. Their ability to cleave this glycosidic bond makes xylanases important in industrial applications ranging from bio-bleaching in paper manufacturing to biofuel production (Pavlova et al., 2026
). They can be divided into exoxylanases, which cleave from the end of xylan chains, and endoxylanases, which cleave internal bonds within the chain. Among the latter, GH10 and GH11 xylanases are widely used in industry. Members of the GH10 family are characterized by a broader substrate specificity, allowing them to degrade substituted xylans commonly found in plants and making them highly useful for the breakdown of plant biomass (Pavlova et al., 2026
).
In addition to their functional importance, GH10 xylanases have been extensively characterized structurally, and crystal structures of bacterial and fungal xylanases have provided insight into substrate binding and catalysis. One example of this is the set of structures of the GH10 family endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the thermophilic ascomycete Thermoascus aurantiacus (TaXyn10). TaXyn10 is a thermostable enzyme that retains activity at temperatures as high as 80°C (Tan et al., 1987
). Following secretion signal peptide cleavage, the mature ectodomain is a 302-amino-acid xylanase that adopts a typical (β/α)8-triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) barrel fold, consisting of eight α-helices and eight β-strands that form a barrel-like structure (Natesh et al., 1999
; Lo Leggio et al., 1999
). Early structural studies have shown that the active site consists of two glutamate residues that are located at the C-terminal end of the TIM barrel, and have proposed structural elements such as tight hydrophobic packing, salt bridges and a disulfide bond as important factors for the thermostability of TaXyn10 (Natesh et al., 1999
). Later studies revealed that substrate binding by TaXyn10 involves the stabilization of flexible residues that surround the active site and that sugar decorations, such as arabinofuranose, attached to the xylan backbone can increase the affinity of TaXyn10 towards such decorated substrates (Lo Leggio et al., 2001
; Vardakou et al., 2005
).
Structural studies have also shown that TaXyn10 has a pyroglutamate (PCA) at its N-terminus (Natesh et al., 2003
, 1999
; Lo Leggio et al., 1999
, 2001
), a post-translational modification that occurs in animals, plants and fungi but is also found in proteins from prokaryotes (Bochtler et al., 2018
). PCA forms through the intramolecular cyclization of an N-terminal glutamine or, in rarer cases, glutamic acid, in which the α-amino group attacks the side-chain amide carbonyl, leading to the formation of a five-membered lactam ring. This reaction can occur spontaneously under physiological conditions and is significantly faster for glutamine than for glutamic acid (Schilling et al., 2008
). In addition, in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, this cyclization is often mediated by glutaminyl cyclases, enzymes predominantly located in the secretory pathway that drastically increase the rate of PCA cyclization compared with the spontaneous reaction (Seifert et al., 2009
; Xu et al., 2021
). N-terminal PCA has numerous functions, including protection from proteolytic degradation by aminopeptidases, stabilization of secondary structures or contributing to the active conformation of proteins (Hinke et al., 2000
; Van Coillie et al., 1998
; Lou et al., 2006
). In addition, PCA can also stabilize a protein and enhance its thermostability, examples of which include lignocellulolytic enzymes isolated from fungi (Wu et al., 2017
), although for TaXyn10 such a stabilizing effect of PCA has not been shown to date.
This variety of functions highlights the importance of PCA, and recombinant production strategies for proteins with naturally occurring N-terminal PCA, such as TaXyn10, need to be designed to allow its formation. However, N-terminal sequences such as an uncleaved starter methionine or residues left from the cleavage of purification tags with commonly used enzymes such as Tobacco etch virus or PreScission protease block a potential N-terminal glutamine or glutamic acid, thereby preventing PCA cyclization. One approach to circumvent this problem is the use of self-cleaving tags which generate an intact native N-terminus after cleavage, thereby permitting PCA formation.
Here, we report the 1.1 Å resolution crystal structure of TaXyn10, recombinantly produced in Escherichia coli and purified using a self-cleaving, split-intein-based system. We show that TaXyn10 produced using this system preserves the native mature structural state and contains an N-terminal PCA.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Macromolecule production
The gene encoding TaXyn10 (residues 27–328, GenBank Accession No. AAF24127.1) with an N-terminal Protein Select split-intein affinity tag was synthesized and codon-optimized for expression in E. coli by GeneArt (Life Technologies; see Table 1
). The gene was cloned into the pET-15b expression vector between the NcoI and XhoI restriction sites. TaXyn10 was recombinantly produced in SHuffle T7 E. coli cells (New England Biolabs) grown in Terrific Broth medium at 30°C. Protein expression was induced when the cells reached an optical density (OD600) of 0.6 by the addition of isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. After induction, the temperature was lowered to 18°C and the cells were further incubated for 16 h. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in buffer consisting of 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0 and lysed by sonication. After an additional centrifugation step, the supernatant was loaded onto a Protein Select column (Cytiva), incubated for 24 h at 20°C for tag cleavage and eluted with elution buffer consisting of 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0. Since only a small fraction of the protein was cleaved after this first incubation, as determined by molecular-weight shift in SDS–PAGE, TaXyn10 was further purified by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a Superdex S75 16/60 column (Cytiva) equilibrated with SEC buffer consisting of 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0. Fractions containing pure TaXyn10 were then pooled, loaded onto a Protein Select column equilibrated with SEC buffer and incubated for 48 h at 20°C for tag cleavage. The protein was eluted with SEC buffer and tag cleavage was verified by SDS–PAGE. Fractions containing pure TaXyn10 were pooled, concentrated to 22.19 mg ml−1, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.
|
||||||||||||||
2.2. Crystallization
Purified TaXyn10 was screened for crystallization at 293 K using a grid screen based on earlier experiments with a differently tagged TaXyn10 construct recombinantly produced in E. coli. By screening the JCSG Core Suite, these experiments identified MES as a suitable buffer and ammonium sulfate as a suitable precipitant (Schnapka, 2019
). To establish optimized crystallization conditions for TaXyn10 purified with the split-intein-based system used here, the pH of MES was varied in steps of 0.5 between 5.7 and 6.7 and the ammonium sulfate concentration was varied in 0.2 M steps from 1.0 to 2.4 M. Plate-like crystals grew in 100 mM MES pH 6.7, 1.2 M ammonium sulfate after one week. These crystals were harvested, transferred into reservoir solution containing 20%(v/v) glycerol as a cryoprotectant and flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen for storage. Crystallization conditions are summarized in Table 2
.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2.3. Data collection and processing
Data were collected on the BESSY II macromolecular crystallography beamline BL14.1 (Mueller et al., 2012
, 2015
, 2025
) at a wavelength of 0.918 Å using an MD2 microdiffractometer and a PILATUS3 X 6M detector. Samples were cooled to 100 K in a nitrogen gas stream. The data were processed with XDSAPP (Sparta et al., 2016
) and AIMLESS (Agirre et al., 2023
). The data-collection and processing statistics are summarized in Table 3
. The crystal displayed a relatively low solvent content of 35.1% (Matthews coefficient VM = 1.92 Å3 Da−1), which is consistent with the low overall Wilson B factor of 4.3 Å2 obtained during data processing with AIMLESS.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.4. Structure solution and refinement
The crystal structure of TaXyn10 recombinantly produced in E. coli was solved by molecular replacement with Phaser-MR (McCoy et al., 2007
), using the crystal structure of TaXyn10 isolated from T. aurantiacus (PDB entry 1gok; Lo Leggio et al., 2001
) with its N-terminal PCA residue removed as an input model. The model was rebuilt by iterative cycles of model building in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010
) and refinement with REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011
), using individual anisotropic B-factor refinement in combination with automatically generated translation/libration/screw restraints and H atoms added at riding positions during refinement. The occupancy of PCA2 or Gln2 was refined independently using REFMAC5, without applying occupancy restraints or constraints. The refinement statistics are shown in Table 4
. A composite omit electron-density map was generated with phenix.refine (Liebschner et al., 2019
) using a model in which the N-terminal PCA2 had been removed and which was subsequently refined with REFMAC5 as described above. Real-space R values and real-space correlation coefficients were calculated using EDSTAT (Tickle, 2012
). Residual peak heights were determined with Coot. All structure figures were generated with PyMOL (Schrödinger).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Results
3.1. Structure of TaXyn10 produced in E. coli
To facilitate the formation of the single disulfide bond in TaXyn10, the protein was recombinantly produced in T7 SHuffle E. coli cells. After purification via split-intein-based affinity chromatography, the protein was further purified by size-exclusion chromatography, followed by tag cleavage. Complete tag cleavage was confirmed by size shift on SDS–PAGE. Recombinant TaXyn10 crystallized in space group P21, and crystals diffracted to 1.11 Å resolution with one copy of TaXyn10 in the asymmetric unit, yielding a Matthews coefficient of 1.92 Å3 Da−1, corresponding to a solvent content of 35.1%.
The overall structure of recombinant TaXyn10 is very similar to that of the protein isolated from T. aurantiacus, adopting the typical TIM-barrel fold (Fig. 1
), with an r.m.s.d. of 0.26 Å over 297 Cα atoms and an r.m.s.d. of 0.65 Å over 2330 protein atoms compared with the high-resolution structure of TaXyn10 (PDB entry 1i1w; Natesh et al., 2003
), excluding a flexible loop comprising residues 276–280 in recombinant TaXyn10. Features that are thought to contribute to the thermostability of TaXyn10, such as the disulfide bond and an extensive salt-bridge network that includes a buried salt bridge between Arg150 and Glu258 (Natesh et al., 2003
, 1999
; Lo Leggio et al., 2001
), were also observed. In contrast to earlier structures, residues 302–305 that form part of the eight βα-loop can be modelled in two alternate conformations, with elevated B factors relative to the rest of the structure, indicating flexibility (Fig. 1
). Of note, a sulfate ion from the crystallization solution interacts with this loop in both conformations, which could have a stabilizing effect that captures these distinct conformations. Interestingly, this part of the loop is directly adjacent to Trp301, which in unliganded structures has been proposed to be more flexible and becomes ordered upon substrate binding (Lo Leggio et al., 2001
). The conformational heterogeneity observed here is therefore consistent with a model of a flexible region surrounding Trp301 that becomes stabilized upon ligand binding.
|
|
Figure 1
Structure of recombinantly produced TaXyn10. TaXyn10 is shown as a cartoon in rainbow representation, with the N-terminus coloured blue and the C-terminus coloured red. The inset shows the two modelled conformations for residues 276–280, coloured by B factors, with blue representing the minimum and red representing the maximum B factor for the protein chain. Trp275 and other residues important for substrate binding are shown in stick representation and a sulfate ion next to the flexible loop is shown in stick representation and coloured by element. |
Furthermore, a glycerol molecule from the cryoprotectant solution was bound in subsite −1 of the active site, forming hydrogen bonds to residues Lys50, His83, Asn130 and Glu237 (Fig. 2
a). This glycerol molecule partly mimics the interactions observed between TaXyn10 and the substrate xylobiose (Lo Leggio et al., 2001
; Fig. 2
b) or xylobiose linked to feruloyl-arabinose (Vardakou et al., 2005
) in this subsite. However, xylobiose also forms hydrogen bonds to Gln207 and His209 (Fig. 2
b), whereas the feruloyl-arabinose-linked xylobiose also contacts Gln207 (Fig. 2
b). None of these interactions are observed in the glycerol-bound structure of TaXyn10. In addition, glycerol binding in subsite −1 does not lead to any conformational changes for the catalytic glutamates Glu130 and Glu237 (Fig. 2
d).
|
Figure 2
Structure of TaXyn10 subsite −1 bound to (a) glycerol, (b) xylobiose (PDB entry 1gor) or (c) xylobiose linked to feruloyl-arabinose (FAX2; PDB entry 2bnj). TaXyn10 is shown as a cartoon and coloured grey, interacting residues and the bound molecules are shown as sticks, and hydrogen bonds are indicated as yellow dotted lines. Glycerol is coloured green, xylobiose blue and FAX2 magenta. For the glycerol molecule, the 2mFo − DFc density contoured at 1.0s is shown as blue mesh. (d) An overlay of subsite −1 for TaXyn10 bound to glycerol, xylobiose or FAX2. Glycerol-, xylobiose- and FAX2-bound TaXyn10 are shown in grey, blue and magenta, respectively. The catalytic residues Glu130 and Glu237 are shown as sticks. |
3.2. Spontaneous N-terminal PCA formation in recombinantly produced TaXyn10
Refinement of the TaXyn10 model with an N-terminal glutamine resulted in positive difference electron density, indicating that the N-terminal density cannot be explained by glutamine alone (Fig. 3
a). Inspection of the 2mFo − DFc electron density around this N-terminal glutamine indicated a ring-like structure into which PCA could be modelled (Fig. 3
b). Of note, the occupancy of PCA refined to 0.64, with a B factor of 12.85, which is similar to the subsequent alanine residues Ala3 and Ala4, which have B factors of 13.07 and 13.68 Å2, respectively. This partial occupancy is consistent with incomplete conversion of the N-terminal glutamine to PCA after cleavage of the tag. Indeed, independent refinement of a model with the N-terminal glutamine at full occupancy and a model with PCA with an occupancy of 0.64 showed that a glutamine at full occupancy leads to a higher real-space R value (0.218 versus 0.112) and a lower real-space correlation coefficient (0.70 versus 0.85) as well as stronger positive and negative mFo − DFc difference-density peaks around the residue. The N-terminal 2mFo − DFc density is only clearly visible when contoured at 1σ, which can partly be explained by the fact that the N-terminus points towards a solvent channel, resulting in higher flexibility as indicated by elevated B factors of the N-terminal residues compared with the rest of the model (Fig. 3
c). Furthermore, a composite omit electron-density map calculated for a model which was refined without the N-terminal PCA showed weak ring-like electron density at the N-terminus (Fig. 3
d) that is consistent with a PCA moiety, providing additional support for the interpretation of the N-terminal residue as PCA.
|
Figure 3
Electron density around the N-terminal PCA in recombinant TaXyn10, calculated after final refinement of the model. (a) Shown are the 2mFo − DFc electron-density maps (blue mesh) contoured at 1.0σ and the mFo − DFc difference electron-density maps (green and red mesh) contoured at 3.0σ around the N-terminal residue modelled as Gln. (b) 2mFo − DFc electron-density maps (blue mesh) contoured at 1.0σ and mFo − DFc difference electron-density maps (green and red mesh) contoured at 3.0σ around the N-terminal residue modelled as PCA. (c) TaXyn10 shown as a cartoon, coloured by B factor with blue representing the minimum and red representing the maximum B factor for the protein chain. The four N-terminal residues, including PCA2, are shown in ball-and-stick representation. Symmetry mates are shown as grey cartoons. (d) 2mFo − DFc composite omit electron-density map (blue mesh) contoured at 0.7σ around the N-terminal PCA. |
4. Discussion
Here, we report the X-ray crystallographic structure of TaXyn10 recombinantly produced in E. coli and identify the presence of an N-terminal PCA. This is the first structural study on recombinantly produced TaXyn10, and the low r.m.s.d. to the structure of protein isolated from native sources (Natesh et al., 2003
) shows that expression of TaXyn10 in the oxidizing cytoplasm of SHuffle T7 E. coli, which promotes disulfide-bond formation, preserves the overall native fold. While the oxidizing environment could influence protein folding, the close structural agreement indicates that it does not substantially alter the overall structure of TaXyn10. Importantly, the structure obtained here also contains the N-terminal PCA, providing structural evidence for PCA formation in recombinantly produced TaXyn10. N-terminal PCA formation is associated with enhanced thermal and proteolytic stability in industrially relevant lignocellulolytic enzymes (Wu et al., 2017
), such as the xylanase studied here. For cyclization to PCA, the N-terminal glutamine or glutamic acid needs to be freely available, which often is not the case for proteins produced in E. coli due to N-terminal residues left over from purification-tag cleavage or incomplete removal of the N-terminal methionine. Our results indicate that the strategy to use a self-cleaving split-intein-based system for purification facilitates PCA formation, which can be relevant to enhance the stability of recombinantly produced proteins such as TaXyn10. Since the N-terminal glutamine is blocked by the split-intein tag before cleavage, the PCA observed in the structure presented here has likely formed spontaneously. This is further supported by the partial occupancy of PCA, which could indicate that a fraction of the molecules in the crystal retain the N-terminal glutamine. Further biochemical experiments could establish the time-course of this N-terminal PCA formation and determine whether a longer incubation after tag cleavage could result in a higher proportion of N-terminal PCA. Alternatively, expression or purification strategies that use glutaminyl cyclases could result in higher cyclization rates.
In addition, TaXyn10 produced in E. coli using this split-intein-based system crystallized within a week and forms relatively robust plate-like crystals. These properties, together with the spontaneous formation of an N-terminal PCA modification that is readily observable in the electron density, make TaXyn10 an attractive model system for practical courses in X-ray crystallography, as it combines straightforward crystallization behaviour with an instructive example for analysing a post-translational modification and the concept of partial occupancy.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the beamline staff of beamline BL14.1, the staff at the HZB MX biolaboratory and access to the beamlines at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie through the Joint MX Berlin MX-Laboratory. We would to thank Helena Tabermann and Evelyn Schnapka for their contributions during the early stages of the project. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
The structure of recombinant TaXyn10 has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 31ct.
References
Agirre, J., Atanasova, M., Bagdonas, H., Ballard, C. B., Baslé, A., Beilsten-Edmands, J., Borges, R. J., Brown, D. G., Burgos-Mármol, J. J., Berrisford, J. M., Bond, P. S., Caballero, I., Catapano, L., Chojnowski, G., Cook, A. G., Cowtan, K. D., Croll, T. I., Debreczeni, J. É., Devenish, N. E., Dodson, E. J., Drevon, T. R., Emsley, P., Evans, G., Evans, P. R., Fando, M., Foadi, J., Fuentes-Montero, L., Garman, E. F., Gerstel, M., Gildea, R. J., Hatti, K., Hekkelman, M. L., Heuser, P., Hoh, S. W., Hough, M. A., Jenkins, H. T., Jiménez, E., Joosten, R. P., Keegan, R. M., Keep, N., Krissinel, E. B., Kolenko, P., Kovalevskiy, O., Lamzin, V. S., Lawson, D. M., Lebedev, A. A., Leslie, A. G. W., Lohkamp, B., Long, F., Malý, M., McCoy, A. J., McNicholas, S. J., Medina, A., Millán, C., Murray, J. W., Murshudov, G. N., Nicholls, R. A., Noble, M. E. M., Oeffner, R., Pannu, N. S., Parkhurst, J. M., Pearce, N., Pereira, J., Perrakis, A., Powell, H. R., Read, R. J., Rigden, D. J., Rochira, W., Sammito, M., Sánchez Rodríguez, F., Sheldrick, G. M., Shelley, K. L., Simkovic, F., Simpkin, A. J., Skubak, P., Sobolev, E., Steiner, R. A., Stevenson, K., Tews, I., Thomas, J. M. H., Thorn, A., Valls, J. T., Uski, V., Usón, I., Vagin, A., Velankar, S., Vollmar, M., Walden, H., Waterman, D., Wilson, K. S., Winn, M. D., Winter, G., Wojdyr, M. & Yamashita, K. (2023). Acta Cryst. D79, 449–461.
Web of Science
CrossRef
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Bochtler, M., Mizgalska, D., Veillard, F., Nowak, M. L., Houston, J., Veith, P., Reynolds, E. C. & Potempa, J. (2018). Front. Microbiol. 9, 230.
CrossRef
PubMed
Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501.
Web of Science
CrossRef
CAS
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Hinke, S. A., Pospisilik, J. A., Demuth, H.-U., Mannhart, S., Kühn-Wache, K., Hoffmann, T., Nishimura, E., Pederson, R. A. & McIntosh, C. H. S. (2000). J. Biol. Chem. 275, 3827–3834.
CrossRef
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., Moriarty, N. W., Oeffner, R. D., Poon, B. K., Prisant, M. G., Read, R. J., Richardson, J. S., Richardson, D. C., Sammito, M. D., Sobolev, O. V., Stockwell, D. H., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A. G., Videau, L. L., Williams, C. J. & Adams, P. D. (2019). Acta Cryst. D75, 861–877.
Web of Science
CrossRef
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Lo Leggio, L., Kalogiannis, S., Bhat, M. K. & Pickersgill, R. W. (1999). Proteins, 36, 295–306.
CrossRef
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Lo Leggio, L., Kalogiannis, S., Eckert, K., Teixeira, S. C. M., Bhat, M. K., Andrei, C., Pickersgill, R. W. & Larsen, S. (2001). FEBS Lett. 509, 303–308.
Web of Science
CrossRef
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Lou, Y.-C., Huang, Y.-C., Pan, Y.-R., Chen, C. & Liao, Y.-D. (2006). J. Mol. Biol. 355, 409–421.
Web of Science
CrossRef
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674.
Web of Science
CrossRef
CAS
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Mueller, U., Barthel, T., Benz, L. S., Bon, V., Crosskey, T., Genter Dieguez, C., Förster, R., Gless, C., Hauß, T., Heinemann, U., Hellmig, M., James, D., Lennartz, F., Oelker, M., Ovsyannikov, R., Singh, P., Wahl, M. C., Weber, G. & Weiss, M. S. (2025). J. Synchrotron Rad. 32, 766–778.
Web of Science
CrossRef
CAS
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Mueller, U., Darowski, N., Fuchs, M. R., Förster, R., Hellmig, M., Paithankar, K. S., Pühringer, S., Steffien, M., Zocher, G. & Weiss, M. S. (2012). J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 442–449.
Web of Science
CrossRef
CAS
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Mueller, U., Förster, R., Hellmig, M., Huschmann, F. U., Kastner, A., Malecki, P., Pühringer, S., Röwer, M., Sparta, K., Steffien, M., Ühlein, M., Wilk, P. & Weiss, M. S. (2015). Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 130, 141.
Web of Science
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367.
Web of Science
CrossRef
CAS
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Natesh, R., Bhanumoorthy, P., Vithayathil, P. J., Sekar, K., Ramakumar, S. & Viswamitra, M. A. (1999). J. Mol. Biol. 288, 999–1012.
Web of Science
CrossRef
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Natesh, R., Manikandan, K., Bhanumoorthy, P., Viswamitra, M. A. & Ramakumar, S. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 105–117.
Web of Science
CrossRef
CAS
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Pavlova, E. Y., Chesnokov, D. O., Slynko, N. M., Zadorozhny, A. V., Uvarova, Y. E., Khlebodarova, T. M., Vasilieva, A. R., Shipova, A. A., Bogacheva, N. V., Shlyakhtun, V. N., Korzhuk, A. V., Bukatich, E. Y. & Peltek, S. E. (2026). Microorganisms, 14, 127.
CrossRef
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schilling, S., Wasternack, C. & Demuth, H.-U. (2008). Biol. Chem. 389, 983–991.
CrossRef
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Schnapka, E. (2019). MSc thesis. FU Berlin, Germany.
Google Scholar
Seifert, F., Schulz, K., Koch, B., Manhart, S., Demuth, H.-U. & Schilling, S. (2009). Biochemistry, 48, 11831–11833.
CrossRef
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Sparta, K. M., Krug, M., Heinemann, U., Mueller, U. & Weiss, M. S. (2016). J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 1085–1092.
Web of Science
CrossRef
CAS
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Tan, L. U. L., Mayers, P. & Saddler, J. N. (1987). Can. J. Microbiol. 33, 689–692.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
Tickle, I. J. (2012). Acta Cryst. D68, 454–467.
Web of Science
CrossRef
CAS
IUCr Journals
Google Scholar
Van Coillie, E., Proost, P., Van Aelst, I., Struyf, S., Polfliet, M., De Meester, I., Harvey, D. J., Van Damme, J. & Opdenakker, G. (1998). Biochemistry, 37, 12672–12680.
CrossRef
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vardakou, M., Flint, J., Christakopoulos, P., Lewis, R. J., Gilbert, H. J. & Murray, J. W. (2005). J. Mol. Biol. 352, 1060–1067.
Web of Science
CrossRef
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Wu, V. W., Dana, C. M., Iavarone, A. T., Clark, D. S. & Glass, N. L. (2017). mBio, 8, e02231-16.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Xu, C., Wang, Y. & Wu, H. (2021). J. Med. Chem. 64, 6549–6565.
CrossRef
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
access
menu