research papers
The role of wavelength and source in the search for sulfur-atom positions evaluated in two case studies: lysozyme at room temperature and cryo apocrustacyanin A1
aDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Brunswick St., Manchester M13 9PL, UK, bCCLRC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire WA4 4AD, UK, and cInstitute of General and Ecological Chemistry, Technical University of Lodz, Zwirki 36, 90-924, Poland
*Correspondence e-mail: m.cianci@dl.ac.uk
Synchrotron radiation beamlines offer automated data collection with faster and larger detectors, a choice of wavelength(s), intense beams and fine collimation. An increasing output of protein crystal structures sustains an interest in streamlining data collection protocols. Thus, more and more investigators are looking into the use of the anomalous signal from sulfur to obtain initial phase information for medium-size proteins. This type of experiment ideally requires the use of synchrotron radiation, softer X-rays and cryocooling of the sample. Here the results are reported of an investigation into locating the weak, i.e. sulfur, anomalous scatterers in lysozyme using rotating anode or synchrotron radiation data recorded at room temperature. It was indeed possible to locate the sulfur atoms from a lysozyme crystal at room temperature. Accurate selection of images during scaling was needed where radiation damage effects were detected. Most interestingly, comparisons are provided of high-redundancy data sets recorded with synchrotron radiation at λ = 2.0 and 1.488 Å, and with Cu Kα and Mo Kα radiation. Apocrustacyanin A1 was also investigated; from the results of a very high redundancy data collection using softer synchrotron X-rays and a cryo-cooled crystal, it was possible to find the sulfur atoms.
Keywords: lysozyme; apocrustacyanin A1; sulfur atom location; wavelength choice; radiation damage; macromolecular crystallography; protein crystallography.
1. Introduction
The past decade has certainly seen macromolecular crystallography evolving from a quite sophisticated academic curiosity to a mature industrial tool for drug discovery. At synchrotrons, the availability of tunable beamlines with highly intense and collimated beams allows scientists, from most countries in most continents, to collect more data with more phasing power.
However, it is also clear that, while anomalous data collection benefits from the use of synchrotrons, it remains true that anomalous data can be obtained from laboratory sources. For example, recent work has highlighted the use of Cu Kα anode sources to measure such data, provided that the data are good and highly redundant (Kwiatkowski et al., 2000; Yang & Pflugrath, 2001; Lemke et al., 2002; Debreczeni, Bunkoczi, Girmann & Sheldrick, 2003; Debreczeni, Bunkoczi, Ma et al., 2003; Debreczeni, Bunkoczi, Zeeck et al., 2003). Moreover, Cr Kα anodes are available, allowing data collection at a softer wavelength with a `home' laboratory source (Kwiatkowski et al., 2000). An overview of the aspects of softer X-rays is given by Helliwell (2004).
Thus, ) or (Mukherjee et al., 1989). The problem of locating anomalous scatterers has been extended to more complicated cases, such as many selenium atoms in the Se-Met MAD method (Hendrickson et al., 1990), by the approach in programs like SnB (Weeks & Miller, 1999) or SHELXD (Schneider & Sheldrick, 2002), or by applying Patterson techniques as in CNS/SOLVE (Brunger et al., 1998) or SOLVE (Terwilliger & Berendzen, 1999).
as a tool is still very important for both synchrotron and laboratory X-ray use. The location of anomalous scatterers from anomalous differences has a long history, either using anomalous Patterson maps (Rossmann & Blow, 1962In the structure solution of apocrustacyanin A1 (Cianci et al., 2001), seeking the sulfur positions was a main goal. The practice and the lessons of that work are reported in detail here. In parallel with these efforts, a xenon derivative was found. Nevertheless, these apocrustacyanin A1 native anomalous differences were harnessed to determine the hand of the molecule (Cianci et al., 2001). In 1999, Dauter and co-workers reported successful results of finding the sulfur atoms from their anomalous signals and of their use for phasing of hen egg-white lysozyme (HEWL) using synchrotron 1.541 Å wavelength cryodata. The small but significant signal from 17 anomalous scatterers, including sulfur and chlorine atoms, was enough to estimate the protein phases of lysozyme, a protein of 129 amino acid residues, by the single-wavelength (SAD) approach (Wang, 1985; for more recent reviews see Dauter et al., 2002; Dodson, 2003; Ramagopal et al., 2003).
We wished to enhance the sulfur signal using softer X-rays because of the extra challenge presented by a bigger protein, namely apocrustacyanin A1.
The feasibility of using softer X-rays had already been determined with experimental work using a lysozyme crystal up to 2.6 Å wavelength (Helliwell, 2004), in turn based on the development and utilization of 2, 1.89, 1.74 and 1.488 Å wavelengths with a variety of protein crystals and (Helliwell, 1984).
The use of softer wavelengths at synchrotrons, to enhance the anomalous signal from sulfur, arose again with the et al., 2000) and shortly after with studies, parallel to that reported here, on the of apocrustacyanin C1 (Gordon et al., 2001) and other protein structures (Micossi et al., 2002; Brown et al., 2002; Doan & Dockland, 2003).
solution of obelin (LiuIn this paper, we report on exploring the feasibility of a high-redundancy approach (Harrop et al., 1996) with HEWL and apocrustacyanin A1 at a variety of wavelengths. At room temperature, HEWL high-redundancy data sets were collected at different wavelengths, namely Cu Kα and Mo Kα using an in-house rotating anode, as well at 2 and 1.488 Å using SRS station 7.2. Dauter et al. (1999) had already performed a 1.5 Å wavelength lysozyme cryo experiment. Room-temperature data collection remains of interest for a variety of reasons, including avoiding cryo-induced structural changes (see e.g. Deacon et al., 1997) and because some protein crystals will not freeze.
2. Background theory
The use of a 2.0 Å wavelength, termed `softer X-rays' (Chayen et al., 2000), produces an increase of 60% in the anomalous signal coming from the sulfur atoms compared with the use of Cu Kα radiation, and 80% relative to Mo Kα. At any wavelength, the signals from the two sulfur atoms in each disulfide bridge can reinforce each other at low and medium resolution (>3 Å). Moreover, anomalous difference Patterson maps calculated at 3 and 2 Å resolution would show a distinct `signature' of splitting of a disulfide Harker peak from one (slightly elongated) into two distinct peaks (Fig. 1). The direct-methods approach to locate anomalous scatterers could, at high resolution, filter E-map phase sets, not only with respect to the figure of merit used in but also by requiring two peaks separated by 2 Å (as is the case for S—S in a disulfide bridge).
The expected anomalous difference of structure-factor amplitudes F can be calculated with the following formula (Olczak et al., 2003):
where NL is the number of protein atoms (excluding H atoms), NA is the number of anomalous scatterers, fOL has a value of 6.7 electrons (weighted number of electrons for each protein atom) and is the imaginary anomalous scattering-factor component for sulfur at the wavelength used. In Table 1, the calculated values of 〈|ΔFanom|〉/〈F〉 (%) for lysozyme and apocrustacyanin A1 at wavelengths of 0.71, 1.54 and 2.0 Å are given.
|
3. Methods
3.1. Crystals
The HEWL crystals used for these experiments had been grown by standard methods (see e.g. Helliwell, 1992). The images were processed using the HKL package (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). The intensities were converted to amplitudes using the program TRUNCATE (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994). Protocols and statistics are reported in Table 2.
|
The apocrustacyanin A1 crystals are those reported by Chayen et al. (2000) and Cianci et al. (2001).
3.2. In-house HEWL data collection
3.2.1. Molybdenum anode source
A large crystal was mounted in a quartz capillary at room temperature. X-ray data were collected using Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.710 Å) from the in-house Rigaku RU-200 X-ray generator and R-AXIS IIc area detector. For the first batch (58 images), an oscillation range of 1° was used. For the second batch (416 images) the oscillation range was 0.75°.
The location of the sulfur anomalous scatterers using Shake `n' Bake (Miller et al., 1994; Weeks & Miller, 1999) was unsuccessful and the anomalous proved to be of poor quality (Fig. 2a). To convert ΔFanom to Eanom values, as required by Shake `n' Bake, its subroutine DREAR (Blessing & Smith, 1999; Howell et al., 2000) was run.
The et al., 1999) was 0.244 (Table 3); the was calculated with OVERLAPMAP (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994).
between this anomalous and the `ideal' calculated from the ten (eight Cys and two Met residues) deposited sulfur-atom positions (PDB code 1LZ8; Dauter
|
3.2.2. Copper anode source
Two crystals were mounted in glass capillaries at room temperature and X-ray data were collected using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.541 Å) from a Rigaku RU-200 X-ray generator and an R-AXIS IIc area detector. For the first crystal, 200 images were collected with an oscillation range of 1.5°, 150 mm crystal to detector distance and an exposure time of 20 min. The second crystal data set was 200 images recorded using an oscillation range of 1.0°, 80 mm crystal to detector distance and an exposure time of 15 min.
The location of the anomalous scatterers was unsuccessful with Shake `n' Bake (Miller et al., 1994; Weeks & Miller, 1999), whilst the anomalous difference Patterson appeared to be of good quality (Fig. 2b). The between this anomalous and the calculated from the ten (eight Cys and two Met residues) deposited sulfur-atom positions (PDB code 1LZ8; Dauter et al., 1999) was 0.477 (Table 3); the was calculated with OVERLAPMAP (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994).
3.2.3. Assessing for radiation damage for in-house Mo Kα and Cu Kα HEWL data collection
The long exposure times and high number of images collected in both cases naturally warranted the consideration that radiation damage could have limited the quality of data collection. Analysis of the B factor per diffraction image did not show any significant sign of radiation damage. In particular, in the case of data collection using the Mo Kα wavelength, the maximum value of the B factor per image was 1, with an average value of 0.5. For the two data collections using the Cu Kα wavelength for both data sets, the maximum value of the B factor per image was 2, with an average value of around 1. At 2 Å resolution, the impact of that correction at the resolution edge, and therefore of radiation damage, is therefore very small.
3.3. HEWL data collection at SRS Daresbury at 1.488 Å
The experiments with lysozyme reported in the previous sections suggested the importance of the use of a synchrotron as the radiation source for this kind of experiment to improve the data statistics. Therefore, the next test experiment was carried out at the SRS in Daresbury (UK) on station 7.2 (Helliwell et al., 1982) with a Ge(111) single-crystal monochromator set to reflect X-rays at λ = 1.488 Å. A MAR 345 image-plate detector system was used to collect 500 images of 1° with exposure times of 60 s per frame, in dose mode.
The location of the anomalous scatterers was unsuccessful with Shake `n' Bake (Miller et al., 1994; Weeks & Miller, 1999). The between this anomalous (Fig. 2c) and the calculated from the ten (eight Cys and two Met residues) deposited sulfur-atom positions (PDB code 1LZ8; Dauter et al., 1999) was improved at 0.60 (Table 3); the was calculated with OVERLAPMAP (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994).
3.4. HEWL data collection at SRS Daresbury at 2.0 Å
The previous experiment, where the Kα, confirmed the need for increasing the anomalous signal coming from the sulfurs, using a softer wavelength of λ = 2.0 Å, as highlighted by preliminary experiments with apocrustacyanin A1 (Chayen et al., 2000).
was better (1.488 Å) with synchrotron radiation than with CuTherefore, another test was carried out at station 7.2 SRS in Daresbury (UK) using λ = 2.0 Å. A MAR 345 image-plate detector system was used to collect 943 images of 1° with exposure times of 5 min per frame, in dose mode. A large crystal, 6 years old, mounted in a quartz capillary at room temperature, had been grown in the ESA's Advanced Protein Crystallization Facility on the NASA Shuttle during the LMS mission (Boggon, 1998). In spite of its age, the crystal's faces were of high optical quality. The first 500 images were scaled all together as a preliminary check for searching for the right parameters to be used with SCALEPACK and Shake `n' Bake. The statistics of the data set are reported in Table 2.
The plot of rejected reflections versus image number (Fig. 3) showed a periodic behaviour with maxima for the number of rejected reflections every 180°. This phenomenon behaved like an absorption and/or radiation damage effect. Moreover, the search for the anomalous scatterers using Shake `n' Bake was inconclusive. Since the number of rejected reflections for each image was very well correlated with the values of χ2 and Rmerge, only images with χ2 and Rmerge below a certain threshold were kept, while `topping up' from the additional 443 unused images. The process was iterated several times. Each time, the chosen images were rescaled and the anomalous scatterer positions sought with Shake `n' Bake. Finally, when 486 `good images' out of 943 images were selected, Shake `n' Bake output was a confirming the successful location of sulfur-atom positions from anomalous differences.3 The disulfide bridges in lysozyme involve residues Cys6–Cys127, Cys30–Cys115, Cys64–Cys80 and Cys76–Cys94. Shake `n' Bake correctly located the four disulfide bridges as four unique positions and also located the sulfur atoms of Met12 and Met105. The experimental anomalous (Fig. 2d) was in good agreement with the calculated for SnB solutions (Fig. 2e) and for the deposited coordinates (Fig. 2f) for the tetragonal lysozyme (PDB code 1LZ8; Dauter et al., 1999). The positions for the peaks were correctly conserved throughout the Harker sections; the coordinates were matched via manual inspection using PDBSET and GENSYM programs (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994). The between these anomalous difference Patterson maps and the Patterson maps calculated from the ten (eight Cys and two Met residues) deposited sulfur-atom positions (PDB code 1LZ8; Dauter et al., 1999) was 0.661 (Table 3). The was calculated with OVERLAPMAP (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994).
The statistics of this 486-image data set are reported in Table 2.
3.4.1. Assessing for radiation damage for the synchrotron data collection
Analysis of the B factors per image for the data collected at 1.488 Å did show a signature of radiation damage. The data set shows an increase of the B factors for the diffraction images around 180 and 360°. B values up to 12 were manifest. This is a serious effect and strongly suggests that the beam traversing through the crystal at the start of the run steadily caused damage. As a result of this analysis, 151 images were removed and Shake `n' Bake re-run. This still did not yield the sulfur sites. For the synchrotron 2 Å wavelength data, we have already documented above that the number of rejected reflections for the merged diffraction images indicated problems every 180° and these were removed. That approach finally gave the sites, as described above.
4. Sulfur-location approach applied to lobster apocrustacyanin A1
4.1. Background
The blue colour of the lobster Homarus gammarus carapace is provided by a 16 protein subunit complex, with 16 bound astaxanthin molecules (for a recent review, see Chayen et al., 2003). Crystal structures were needed to provide the structural basis of the spectral shifts of the carotenoid in the complex state. Crystals of α-crustacyanin were first reported some 30 years ago, though without any recorded diffraction. Later, single subunits of this complex were targeted, but their determination proved problematic through lack of a suitable model even from the same family of lipocalin proteins, lack of good heavy-atom derivatives, and lack of seleno-methionine variants.
The lack of success with ordinary techniques of protein et al., 2000). One possibility was the use of anomalous differences from the three putative disulfides per monomer (six per from 12 cysteines) to locate anomalous scatterers via anomalous difference Patterson maps (Brunger et al., 1998; Terwilliger & Berendzen, 1999), by a approach (Mukherjee et al., 1989; Weeks & Miller, 1999; Schneider & Sheldrick, 2002), or, in a more esoteric way, with (Antson et al., 1995). For apocrustacyanin A1, early results (Chayen et al., 2000) suggested other basic requirements for locating the weak anomalous scatterers such as sulfur atoms, namely the need for accurate data measurement and use of a softer wavelength. However, crystals of apocrustacyanin protein, available in limited amount, proved to be notoriously fragile and not adequate for any soaking (Boggon, 1999; Cianci, 2002), thus making the preparation of suitable cryo conditions difficult.
determination for apocrustacyanin A1 warranted consideration of new approaches (Chayen4.2. Crystals and methods
The apocrustacyanin A1 crystals were those reported by Chayen et al. (2000) and Cianci et al. (2001). Protocols and statistics of the room-temperature data, referred to as `room-temperature low-redundancy 1.488 Å' (Chayen et al., 2000) and `room-temperature low-redundancy 2.0 Å' (Chayen et al., 2000), and the cryo data, `cryo high-redundancy 2.0 Å' (Cianci et al., 2001), analysed here are reported in Table 4. To attempt the location of the sulfur-atom positions from the anomalous signal harnessed with the 644-image `cryo high-redundancy 2.0 Å' data set, Shake `n' Bake (Miller et al., 1994; Weeks & Miller, 1999) was used. The subroutine DREAR (Blessing & Smith, 1999; Howell et al., 2000) was run, prior to Shake `n' Bake, to convert the ΔFanom to Eanom values. However, after several runs of Shake `n' Bake it was clear that it was not possible to locate the sulfur-atom positions from the weak sulfur-atom anomalous signal of this data set.
The plot of rejected reflections versus number of images (Fig. 4) showed, similar to the lysozyme test (Fig. 3), a maximum for the number of rejected reflections at 0° and at 360°. For Shake `n' Bake, the same protocol was then used as for the lysozyme case. The data processing was repeated progressively, excluding those images whose Rmerge and χ2 values were highest. Finally, 411 images were selected for which Shake `n' Bake yielded the positions of the anomalous scatterers, as evidenced by a Comparison of these coordinates with those based on the SIROAS Xenon phased maps (Cianci et al., 2001) reflected their correctness. The positions of the peaks are conserved throughout the various sections (Fig. 5).
5. Discussion
5.1. HEWL results
Our investigations into the problems of location of weak anomalous scatterers using a variety of sources and wavelengths, reported here, show the advantages of using intense synchrotron radiation with 2 Å wavelength for finding sulfur-atom positions. In fact, differently from the previous case of Dauter et al. (1999), the sulfurs in HEWL were successfully located from a single lysozyme crystal mounted on a quartz capillary at room temperature rather than at cryo temperature. Looking at the HEWL case, data quality did not particularly suffer from the use of a longer wavelength. These data sets are each of very high redundancy, which affects the Rmerge. It should be borne in mind that the HEWL data were room-temperature and not cryo data. The percentage of data above 3σ is a different way to show the data quality; all data sets here have about 95% > 3σ(I) overall and >85% in the outer shell, except the Mo Kα set, with percentages of 88% and 66%, respectively. These data sets are significantly strong at the edge of the pattern.
The processing of images and monitoring of rejected reflections per image was carefully done in order to use the weak anomalous signal of the sulfur atoms in Shake `n' Bake. Different protocols (i.e. using other processing packages) may give different (better or worse) results, as explained by Weiss et al. (2001) in a study parallel to this one. In our case, discarding of images was achieved via χ2 and Rmerge monitoring. In particular, given the quality of the anomalous difference Patterson Harker sections of Fig. 2(b) and the of 0.477 (Table 3), it is quite possible that our room-temperature HEWL Cu Kα data set may be close to yielding a Shake `n' Bake solution.
Shake `n' Bake (Miller et al., 1994; Weeks & Miller, 1999) could locate the positions of the anomalous scatterers (Smith et al., 1998) only when a sufficient number of Nref [number of reflections per shell with ΔFanom greater than three times σ(ΔFanom)] were present (see Figs. 6 and 7). A low number of Nref means that in Shake `n' Bake, and probably in other programs exploiting the ratios atoms:reflections, reflections:invariants and |E|/σ(E) have to be relaxed from their default values, thereby reducing the likelihood of locating anomalous scatterers (Wang & Ealick, 2003).
For HEWL, because of the large crystal size, perhaps the data suffered from absorption variations. The crystal was chosen so as to be big enough to survive the likely radiation damage that a high-redundancy data collection at room temperature would produce. The crystal was nearly isodimensional (0.7 × 0.7 × 0.6 mm) with Tmax/Tmin = 0.91 at 1.488 Å wavelength. Absorption errors can therefore probably be ruled out to explain why sulfur could not be found at 1.488 Å wavelength for HEWL.
For the HEWL case, the experimental values of 〈|ΔFanom|/|F|〉 of each data set (all have high redundancy) increase while moving to a longer wavelength, i.e. Mo Kα, synchrotron 1.488 Å, Cu Kα, to synchrotron 2 Å wavelength. It should be expected that the source has no effect on this parameter, but only for synchrotron 2.0 Å the calculated values of 〈|ΔFanom|/|F|〉 versus resolution are around 2–3.5% in the resolution range between 3.0 and 5.0 Å as expected from calculated values (Table 1).
Fig. 6 compares, for each lysozyme data set, 〈|ΔFanom|/σ(ΔFanom)〉 and Nref versus resolution, where Nref is the number of reflections per shell with ΔFanom greater than 3 times σ(ΔFanom). 〈|ΔFanom|/σ(ΔFanom)〉 and Nref appear to be dependent on the type of source and wavelength used, with a definite increment in the number of reflections with significant anomalous signal in favour of synchrotron radiation. Mo Kα has no resolution range with 〈|ΔFanom|/σ(ΔFanom)〉 > 1; Cu Kα had Δ ≥ 1σ up to 3.93 Å resolution; synchrotron 1.488 Å had Δ ≥ 1σ nearly up to 3.0 Å resolution, and the synchrotron 2 Å wavelength data set had Δ ≥ 1σ in all the resolution ranges. Table 3 also shows an improvement of the of the observed with calculated Patterson maps, while shifting to a longer wavelength, i.e. Mo Kα versus Cu Kα, synchrotron 1.488 Å versus synchrotron 2 Å wavelength. The improvement of 〈I〉/〈σ(I)〉 in the statistics of the data sets when collected at SRS station 7.2 at 2 Å is also evident.
5.2. Apocrustacyanin A1 results
Since no solution could be found applying Shake `n' Bake to the room-temperature data, `room-temperature low-redundancy 1.488 Å' and `room-temperature low-redundancy 2.0 Å' (Chayen et al., 2000), and since the image-rejection approach could not be employed either, a high-redundancy 2 Å wavelength data set had to be measured, with cryo conditions harnessed to allow the crystal to survive possible radiation damage (Garman & Schneider, 1997). A high-quality subset of images was selected, for which Shake `n' Bake produced a bimodal diagram. As Table 4 shows, the Rmerge improved, as one would expect.
The values of 〈|ΔFanom|/|F|〉 resolution for the high-redundancy 411-image data set are around 1.9–2.1% in the resolution range between 3.2 and 5.0 Å, as expected from calculated values for data collected at λ = 2.0 Å (Table 1). Fig. 7 shows the benefits of a very high redundancy cryo approach (411 images used), i.e the 2 Å wavelength high-redundancy curve versus the other curves.
5.3. Common results between the two case studies
If we now compare the two case studies, firstly, for the apocrustacyanin A1 data sets collected at 1.488 Å and at 2.0 Å wavelength at room temperature and with low redundancy, 〈|ΔFanom|/σ(ΔFanom)〉 and Nref values across all resolution shells do not improve as much as observed in the HEWL case (i.e. compare Figs. 6 and 7). Only for the apocrustacyanin A1 cryo data set collected at 2.0 Å wavelength with a high multiplicity does the ratio 〈|ΔFanom|/σ(ΔFanom)〉 reach beyond a value of 1.0 in the lower resolution shells. The behaviour of the parameter Nref for the apocrustacyanin A1 case, across the same range of resolution, is less good, even though Shake `n' Bake obviously worked.
Secondly, in both the HEWL and the apocrustacyanin A1 case, the highly redundant data sets were pruned, i.e images systematically removed in order to achieve a bimodal Shake `n' Bake distribution. The basis for the removal of any image was the same in each case, namely monitoring χ2, Rmerge, rejected reflections and the B factor per diffraction image. The removal of a significant number of images, in several iterations, is neither an optimal use of data collection beam time or the investigator's analysis time. However, rapid data collection has allowed this approach. A longer exposure for each image, but with fewer images for the available beam time, would have perhaps been the more automatic route, but with room-temperature data radiation damage is then the cause of anxiety.
6. Conclusion
Working at room temperature with lysozyme as a test revealed that SRS λ = 2 Å data were needed over a full revolution for Shake `n' Bake to succeed, but still with careful trimming of images out of the data set. correlation coefficients with the ideal map improved from short to long wavelength, and from Cu Kα to 1.488 Å synchrotron radiation. Guided by these evaluations with HEWL, the more challenging case of apocrustacyanin A1 warranted use of synchrotron radiation, yet higher redundancy, use of a softer X-ray wavelength (λ = 2 Å), and cryo conditions. Trimming out of images was also needed. Shake `n' Bake was thereby successful. Our approach to the location of sulfur atoms and the experience detailed here add to a growing enthusiasm for the use of softer synchrotron X-rays in in protein crystallography.
Footnotes
‡Current address: CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire WA4 4AD, UK.
§Current address: Institute of General and Ecological Chemistry, Technical University of Lodz, Zeromskiego 116, Poland.
3A supplementary table of these SnB-derived coordinates and the coordinates of the same set of atoms deposited by Dauter et al. (1999) (PDB code 1LZ8) is available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: EA5014 ). Services for accessing these data are described at the back of the journal.
Acknowledgements
We thank The Leverhulme Trust and the EU Crystallogenesis Project for salary support (AO) and the EPSRC for studentship support (MC). MC's salary support has continued, as a PDRA, under a BBSRC Award at Daresbury [PI's: J. R. Helliwell and S. S. Hasnain with nine other members of the North West Structural Genomics Consortium (NWSGC)]. Access to the SRS facilities was awarded by the Joint Biology Program of the Research Councils of the UK. This paper is a third article contribution from the NWSGC, Manchester node with Daresbury Laboratory.
References
Antson, A. A., Otrudge, J., Brzozowski, A. M., Dodson, E. J., Dodson, G. G., Wilson, K. S., Smith, T. M., Yang, M., Kurecki, T. & Gollnik, P. (1995). Nature (London), 374, 693–700. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Blessing, R. H. & Smith, G. D. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 664–670. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Boggon, T. J. (1998). PhD thesis, Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester. Google Scholar
Brown, J., Esnouf, R. M., Jones, M. A., Linnell, J., Harlos, K., Hassan, A. B. & Jones, E. Y. (2002). EMBO J. 21, 1054–1062. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T. & Warren, G. L. (1998). Acta Cryst. D54, 905–921. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chayen, N. E., Cianci, M., Grossmann, J. G., Habash, J., Helliwell, J. R., Nneji, G. A., Raftery, J., Rizkallah, P. J. & Zagalsky, P. F. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 2072–82. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chayen, N. E., Cianci, M., Olczak, A., Raftery, J., Rizkallah, P. J., Zagalsky, P. F. & Helliwell, J. R. (2000). Acta Cryst. D56, 1064–1066. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Cianci, M. (2002). PhD thesis, Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester. Google Scholar
Cianci, M., Rizkallah, P. J., Olczak, A., Raftery, J., Chayen, N. E., Zagalsky, P. F. & Helliwell, J. R. (2001). Acta Cryst. D57, 1219–1229. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Dauter, Z., Dauter, M. & Dodson, E. (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 494–506. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Dauter, Z., Dauter, M., de La Fortelle, E., Bricogne, G. & Sheldrick, G. M. (1999). J. Mol. Biol. 28, 83–92. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Deacon, A., Gleichmann, T., Kalb (Gilboa), A. J., Price, H., Raftery, J., Bradbrook, G., Yariv, J. & Helliwell, J. R. (1997). Faraday Trans. 93, 4305–4312. Google Scholar
Debreczeni, J. E., Bunkoczi, G., Girmann, B. & Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 393–395. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Debreczeni, J. E., Bunkoczi, G., Ma, Q., Blaser, H. & Sheldrick G. M. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 688–696. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Debreczeni, J. E., Girmann, B., Zeeck, A., Kratzner, R. & Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 2125–2132. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Doan, D. N. & Dockland, T. (2003). Structure, 11, 1445–1451. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Dodson, E. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 1958–1965. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Garman, E. F. & Schneider, T. R. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 211–237. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gordon, E. J., Leonard, G. A., McSweeney, S. & Zagalsky, P. F. (2001). Acta Cryst. D57, 1230–1237. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Harrop, S. J., Helliwell, J. R., Wan T. C. M., Kalb (Gilboa), A. J., Tong, L. & Jariv, J. (1996). Acta Cryst. D52, 143–155. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. R. (1984). Rep. Prog. Phys. 47, 1403–1497. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. R. (1992). Macromolecular Crystallography with Synchrotron Radiation. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. R. (2004). J. Synchrotron Rad. 11, 1–3. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. R., Greenhough, T. J., Carr, P. D., Rule, S. H., Moore, P. R., Thompson, A. W. & Worgan, J. S. (1982). J. Phys. E, 15, 1563–1372. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Hendrickson, W. A, Horton, J. R. & LeMaster, D. M. (1990). EMBO J. 9, 1665–1672. CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Howell, P. L., Blessing, R. H., Smith, G. D. & Weeks, C. M. (2000). Acta Cryst. D56, 604–617. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kwiatkowski, W., Noel, J. P. & Choe, S. (2000). J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 876–881. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lemke, C. T., Smith, G. D. & Howell, P. L. (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 2096–2101. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Liu, Z. J., Vysotski, E. S., Chen, C. J., Rose, J. P., Lee, J. & Wang, B. C. (2000). Protein Sci. 9, 2086–2093. CrossRef Google Scholar
Micossi, E., Hunter, W. N. & Leonard, G. A. (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 21–28. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Miller, R., Gallo, S. M., Khalak, H. G. & Weeks, C. M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 613–621. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A., Helliwell, J. R. & Main, P. (1989). Acta Cryst. A45, 715–718. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Olczak, A., Cianci, M., Hao, Q., Rizkallah, P. J., Raftery, J. & Helliwell, J. R. (2003). Acta Cryst. A59, 327–334. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ramagopal, U. A., Dauter, M. & Dauter, Z. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 1020–1027. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rossmann, M. G. & Blow, D. M. (1962). Acta Cryst. 15, 24. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Schneider, T. R. & Sheldrick, G. M. (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 1772–1779. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Smith, G. D., Nagar, B., Rini, J. M., Haupman, H. A. & Blessing, R. H. (1998). Acta Cryst. D54, 799–804. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Terwilliger, T. C. & Berendzen, J. (1999). Acta Cryst. D55, 501–505. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yang, C. & Pflugrath, J. W. (2001). Acta Cryst. D57, 1480–1490. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wang, B. C. (1985). Methods Enzymol. 115, 90–112. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, J. & Ealick, S. E. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 1397–1401. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Weeks, C. M. & Miller, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 120–124. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Weiss, M. S., Sicker, T., Djinovic Carugo, K. & Hilgenfeld, R. (2001). Acta Cryst. D57, 689–695. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.