research papers
Energy research with neutrons (ErwiN) and installation of a fast neutron powder diffraction option at the MLZ, Germany1
aInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany, and bHeinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstrasse 1, 85748, Garching bei München, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: michael.heere@kit.edu
The need for rapid data collection and studies of small sample volumes in the range of cubic millimetres are the main driving forces for the concept of a new high-throughput monochromatic diffraction instrument at the Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), Germany. A large region of
will be accessed by a detector with sufficient and microsecond time resolution, while allowing for a variety of complementary sample environments. The medium-resolution neutron powder diffraction option for `energy research with neutrons' (ErwiN) at the high-flux FRM II neutron source at the MLZ is foreseen to meet future demand. ErwiN will address studies of energy-related systems and materials with respect to their structure and uniformity by means of bulk and spatially resolved neutron powder diffraction. A set of experimental options will be implemented, enabling time-resolved studies, rapid parametric measurements as a function of external parameters and studies of small samples using an adapted radial collimator. The proposed powder diffraction option ErwiN will bridge the gap in functionality between the high-resolution powder diffractometer SPODI and the time-of-flight diffractometers POWTEX and SAPHiR at the MLZ.Keywords: neutron powder diffraction; operando techniques; in situ studies; spatially resolved characterization; energy storage.
1. Introduction
Energy storage is one of the great challenges for present and future generations. As humanity tries to reduce the use of CO2-intensive energy production pathways and adopt renewable ones, it is necessary to store renewably generated energy for times of great demand, as a direct consequence of the inherently intermittent means by which such energy is produced, i.e. sun and wind. In Germany, power production has changed during the past decade, especially after the meltdown in Fukushima, Japan. Germany decided to undertake an Energiewende, which translates as `a drastic change in energy production'. With that in mind, renewable energy production has been increased, and the current need for energy storage systems inspired the project ErwiN (energy research with neutrons), with opportunities to investigate energy-related materials in situ and operando with Among other energy-storage technologies, the focus will primarily be on Li-ion batteries. Moreover, other fields of research could benefit from a fast neutron powder diffraction instrument. For example, in situ hydrogenation measurements on materials suitable for concentrated solar power (Sheppard et al., 2014; Humphries et al., 2016) or hydrogen storage (Heere, GharibDoust et al., 2016; Heere, Sørby et al., 2016; GharibDoust et al., 2016; Heere, GharibDoust, Brighi et al., 2017; Dolci et al., 2010; Heere, GharibDoust, Sørby et al., 2017; Frommen et al., 2015) could help researchers to understand reaction pathways. Furthermore, operando multi-parameter studies could be undertaken to follow structural changes in magnetic and electrical fields (Ehrenberg et al., 2012; Gilmore et al., 2018) or in ferroelectric materials (Hinterstein et al., 2015), or to carry out simultaneous electrochemical and powder diffraction measurements on batteries (Senyshyn et al., 2013). With the second detector, spatially resolved diffraction studies can be carried out, e.g. to determine the lithium distribution inside Li-ion cells (Senyshyn et al., 2014, 2015; Mühlbauer et al., 2017).
ErwiN itself will be a new and fast neutron powder diffraction option at the FRM II neutron source in Munich, and it will also update and complement the current RESI instrument at beamport SR8b – a single-crystal diffractometer using et al., 2006). In this work, we present the future experimental setup of ErwiN, which will share the beamport and primary neutron optics with the RESI diffractometer. The commissioning of ErwiN started in 2017 and the instrument is expected to be operational by mid-2019.
(Pedersen2. Proposed experimental setup
The project ErwiN and its proposed experimental setup are inspired by two world-class high-throughput powder diffractometers operating with monochromatic neutrons, namely D20 at the Institut Laue–Langevin (ILL), Grenoble, France (Hansen et al., 2008), and WOMBAT at the Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering (ACNS), ANSTO, Sydney, Australia (Studer et al., 2006). The principle of the ErwiN setup is presented in Fig. 1, where Fig. 1(a) shows the complete scheme while Fig. 1(b) elucidates the rear view and, therefore, the view on the `narrow' 30° curved two-dimensional detector. Fig. 1 includes the monochromatic beam exit (labelled 1) [including the (PG)/Ge/Cu monochromators]. The secondary flight path (labelled 2) comprises a fast shutter, a neutron monitor, a horizontal Soller collimator, a PG filter and a specially designed slit system. The Soller collimator and PG filter are pneumatically driven, while adjustment of the slit system will be performed by a combination of linear stages (not shown in Fig. 1). The sample table is designed for handling heavy sample environments up to 1000 kg, such as vertical superconducting magnets and tensile rigs. The installation of the Eulerian cradle of the current RESI setup will allow for texture measurements or offer the functionality of a four-circle diffractometer.
The stock of vanadium sample containers (labelled 3 in Fig. 1a) with up to 100 samples will be handled by a six-axis robot (labelled 4; Stäubli TX2-60 CS9) for fully automated sample changing with a standard gripping system by Co. Schunk. The robotic arm will serve as a sample stage with x, y, z, ω, χ translation capabilities for small samples (nominally 3.5 kg, maximum 9 kg, 30 µm positional accuracy) for bulk and spatially resolved neutron powder diffraction.
The sample table (labelled 5) consists of three goniometer tables (θ1, θ2, θ3). Additionally, the sample table can be moved ±125 mm in the x, y and z directions, with an additional rotational ω axis installed on top (not shown in Fig. 1).
The large curved two-dimensional multidetector [multiwire proportional chamber (MWPC), labelled 6] will have a 2θ coverage ≥135° (based on curved segments of 15° 2θ each), with an effective sample-to-detector distance of 0.80 m (inner radius of curvature ri = 0.8 m) and a vertical sensitive area of 0.20 m (corresponding to ν ≃ 15°). The unwanted scattering signal of the sample environment will be suppressed by a radial oscillating collimator (labelled 7). The powder option is designed to deliver diffraction patterns on a two-dimensional detector from an ∼1 cm3 sample volume in only a few minutes and from a ca 10–30 mg sample in 5–15 h. The large curved two-dimensional multiwire chamber is considered to be the main detection system for ErwiN. Based on the initial design of Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA (Langan et al., 2004), installed on the Protein Crystallography Station at LANL (now at ORNL, Tennessee, USA), and on the WOMBAT diffractometer (Studer et al., 2006) at ACNS, the new modification of the detector will be built by the detector group at FRM II. A two-segment (2 × 15° in 2θ) prototype (Fig. 2) has already been developed and built and was tested in late 2017. The physical detector resolution is expected to be better than 1.5 mm, with a maximum count rate of 200 000 counts s−1 per segment (a rate limit of 1.8 MHz for the whole detector) and event-mode detection with a nanosecond timestamp.
It is planned that the prototype of the curved two-dimensional multidetector will become operational at the end of 2018. It will be used as a `narrow' 30° two-dimensional neutron detector (labelled 8) for spatially resolved powder diffraction and will remain at the instrument alongside the larger curved two-dimensional multidetector. Fast mechanical remounting plugs (dowel pins) are installed to enable fast exchange of the sample table and detectors (labelled 10).
Fig. 1(b) presents the setup for the spatially resolved powder diffraction option at ErwiN, while Fig. 2 shows the 30° two-dimensional neutron detector as it is currently being tested at the TREFF neutron reflectometer at the MLZ. Experiments with minimum gauge volumes in the region of 1 mm3 are foreseen, which require a sophisticated radial oscillating collimator (9) with a field of view of ∅ < 1 mm (∅ < 0.5 mm as an option). Data will be collected by the 30° two-dimensional neutron 3He detector, and the effect of 1.5 mm detector resolution on the instrument resolution can be compensated by the sample-to-detector distance of 0.8 m, which will result in an angular (2θ × ν) detector coverage of 30° × 15°.
The proposed setup for ErwiN will benefit from the rather short neutron guide and therefore a location close to the reactor vessel, with a distance of only 8.4 m from the reactor polygon to the monochromator. This combination of a bright neutron source and a short distance provides a high neutron ) and achieves a neutron beam from 70 × 40 mm (h × v) at the reactor polygon down to 60 × 30 mm (h × v) in front of the monochromator. The level of background is minimized by heavy concrete shielding (1.2 m thick). At the moment, the single-crystal option RESI employs discrete exits, equivalent to three fixed take-off angles. The first option is a 90° take-off angle with two alternative monochromator options, the 511 reflection from a focused Ge monochromator and the 422 reflection from a Cu monochromator, with mosaic spreads of 20 and 25′, respectively. Two other options with take-off angles of 50 and 70° are available and result in configurations with increased neutron Although the configuration at 50° take-off will only be available by switching the detector position to the defocused diffractometer side, it is considered a reasonable instrument configuration as it reaches the highest at the sample position.
(see the table in Fig. 3The powder diffraction option ErwiN will share beamport SR8b with the single-crystal diffractometer RESI, which will preserve all its present functions. The available beam time will be allocated between ErwiN and RESI upon specific requests. For a quick change between the two instrument layouts, all parts of ErwiN are designed to be mobile, namely the secondary flight path, the sample goniometer, the curved two-dimensional detector and the setup for spatially resolved diffraction. They will be attached to each other via mechanical dowel pins, enabling easy remounting with a reproducibility better than 100 µm.
The instrument will be operated by the NICOS control system, a common software solution controlling instruments at the MLZ (https://forge.frm2.tum.de/wiki/). Event-mode recording and high rates of data collection place high demands on fast instrument control, communication protocols and data storage. The required computing capabilities will be specified in more detail after finalizing the results of testing the first detector prototype in late 2017.
3. Simulations
Ray-tracing Monte Carlo simulations (McStas; Lefmann & Nielsen, 1999) have been performed for the proposed powder option using the existing primary neutron optics and monochromators of SR8b (Fig. 4). In the present monochromator configuration (Ge511 and Cu422) only short wavelengths can be accessed at low take-off angles, considerably limiting the resolution of the setup in the high-intensity option. Therefore, a vertically focusing PG monochromator with 30′ mosaicity (see the table of available wavelengths in Fig. 3) is proposed to be installed as a third monochromator in the RESI casemate. With this suite of monochromators, a broad range of wavelengths (0.46–4.8 Å) can be selected from the thermal spectrum at three take-off angles of beamport SR8b. Neutron fluxes, divergence profiles and resolution curves in the form of real two-dimensional diffraction patterns were calculated for three configurations, namely (1) standard resolution, (2) high energy and (3) high intensity (Lefmann & Nielsen, 1999). The results are summarized in Figs. 3 and 4. The available Q ranges for all options are given in Table 1. The experimental resolution function of the high-resolution diffractometer SPODI (Hoelzel et al., 2012) is shown for comparison in Fig. 4.
‡Corresponding to curve (2) (green) in Fig. 4. §Corresponding to curve (3) (blue) in Fig. 4. |
Configurations (1) and (3) are foreseen for the standard operation of ErwiN, where neutron fluxes differ by a factor of three and the minimum of the resolution curve is shifted depending on the take-off angle (compare Fig. 3). The neutron at ErwiN is predicted to be five to ten times higher than that at SPODI in its standard configuration (155° take-off angle). Along with the advantages of the stationary detector (no need to reposition to collect a complete diffraction pattern; compare this with SPODI, which makes either 20 or 40 resolution steps in order to complete a diffraction pattern in the angular range 10–160° in 2θ), this may give an overall gain of up to 100 in data thus reducing the required exposure times from hours to minutes in the standard-resolution configuration. The ErwiN option will thus open new fields of kinetic time-resolved, multi-parametric and spatially resolved operando neutron diffraction experiments at the MLZ. By its functionality, not only is ErwiN complementary to the existing high-resolution powder diffractometer SPODI but, with its monochromatic beam, it is also complementary to the time-of-flight medium-resolution diffractometers POWTEX and SAPHiR, which are under construction.
4. Conclusions and future outlook
The `fast' powder diffraction option (ErwiN) at beamport SR8b at the MLZ is an attractive instrumental solution for the neutron science user community and complements the existing and future instrumental pool at the MLZ. Furthermore, the location of ErwiN in the `diffractometers' corner' of the experimental hall has a number of advantages regarding the transfer of sample environment, equipment and experimental infrastructure. The development of a medium-resolution powder diffraction instrument using a large two-dimensional detector option will boost internal and external research activities equally. This will also help to consolidate new concepts and to prove them.
The thermal neutron beam at SR8b is ideal for hosting the high-efficiency powder diffraction option ErwiN. This is underlined by the above-described beam conditions, optional take-off angles close to the direct beam and the availability of sufficient space for all experimental setups.
Footnotes
1This article will form part of a virtual special issue on advanced neutron scattering instrumentation, marking the 50th anniversary of the journal.
Acknowledgements
The contributions of Dr B. Pedersen to the ErwiN project are gratefully acknowledged. The prototype of the 30° two-dimensional neutron detector was built as a collaboration between the FRM II detector group and their partners from the PSI and the ILL (CHARM project). We would like to acknowledge the provision of the detector images.
Funding information
The following funding is acknowledged: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (grant No. 05K16VK2).
References
Dolci, F., Weidner, E., Hoelzel, M., Hansen, T., Moretto, P., Pistidda, C., Brunelli, M., Fichtner, M. & Lohstroh, W. (2010). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35, 5448–5453. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, H., Senyshyn, A., Hinterstein, M. & Fuess, H. (2012). Modern Diffraction Methods, edited by E. J. Mittemeijer & U. Welzel, pp. 491–517. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. Google Scholar
Frommen, C., Heere, M., Riktor, M. D., Sørby, M. H. & Hauback, B. C. (2015). J. Alloys Compd. 645 (Suppl. 1), S155–S159. Google Scholar
GharibDoust, S. H. P., Heere, M., Sørby, M. H., Ley, M. B., Ravnsbæk, D. B., Hauback, B. C., Černý, R. & Jensen, T. R. (2016). Dalton Trans. 45, 19002–19011. Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. J., Kaduk, J. A. & Schenk, H. (2018). Editors. International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. H, Powder Diffraction. In the press. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
Hansen, T. C., Henry, P. F., Fischer, H. E., Torregrossa, J. & Convert, P. (2008). Meas. Sci. Technol. 19, 034001. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Heere, M., GharibDoust, S. H. P., Brighi, M., Frommen, C., Sørby, M. H., Černý, R., Jensen, T. R. & Hauback, B. C. (2017). Inorganics, 5, 31. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Heere, M., GharibDoust, S. H. P., Frommen, C., Humphries, T. D., Ley, M. B., Sørby, M. H., Jensen, T. R. & Hauback, B. C. (2016). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 24387–24395. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Heere, M., GharibDoust, S. H. P., Sørby, M. H., Frommen, C., Jensen, T. R. & Hauback, B. C. (2017). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 42, 22468–22474. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Heere, M., Sørby, M. H., Pistidda, C., Dornheim, M. & Hauback, B. C. (2016). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 41, 13101–13108. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hinterstein, M., Hoelzel, M., Rouquette, J., Haines, J., Glaum, J., Kungl, H. & Hoffman, M. (2015). Acta Mater. 94, 319–327. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hoelzel, M., Senyshyn, A., Juenke, N., Boysen, H., Schmahl, W. & Fuess, H. (2012). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 667, 32–37. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Humphries, T., Sheppard, D., Rowles, M., Sofianos, M. & Buckley, C. (2016). J. Mater. Chem. A, 4, 12170–12178. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Langan, P., Greene, G. & Schoenborn, B. P. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 24–31. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lefmann, K. & Nielsen, K. (1999). Neutron News, 10(3), 20–23. CrossRef Google Scholar
Mühlbauer, M., Dolotko, O., Hofmann, M., Ehrenberg, H. & Senyshyn, A. (2017). J. Power Sources, 348, 145–149. Google Scholar
Pedersen, B., Frey, F., Scherer, W., Gille, P. & Meisterernst, G. (2006). Physica B, 385–386, 1046–1048. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Senyshyn, A., Dolotko, O., Mühlbauer, M., Nikolowski, K., Fuess, H. & Ehrenberg, H. (2013). J. Electrochem. Soc. 160, A3198–A3205. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Senyshyn, A., Mühlbauer, M., Dolotko, O., Hofmann, M. & Ehrenberg, H. (2015). Sci. Rep. 5, 18380. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Senyshyn, A., Mühlbauer, M., Dolotko, O., Hofmann, M., Pirling, T. & Ehrenberg, H. (2014). J. Power Sources, 245, 678–683. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheppard, D. A., Corgnale, C., Hardy, B., Motyka, T., Zidan, R., Paskevicius, M. & Buckley, C. E. (2014). RSC Adv. 4, 26552–26562. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Studer, A. J., Hagen, M. E. & Noakes, T. J. (2006). Physica B, 385–386, 1013–1015. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.