research papers
Quasielastic neutron scattering of brucite to analyse hydrogen transport on the atomic scale
aInstitute for Planetary Materials, Okayama University, Misasa, Tottori 682-0193, Japan, bKochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Nankoku, Kochi 783-8502, Japan, cHiroshima Institute of Plate Convergence Region Research, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan, and dMaterials and Life Science Division, J-PARC Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: okuchi@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp
It is demonstrated that quasielastic neutron scattering is a novel and effective method to analyse atomic scale hydrogen transport processes occurring within a mineral 2: a jump within a single two-dimensional layer of the hydrogen lattice and a jump into the next nearest layer of it. These transport processes observed within the prototypical structure of brucite have direct implications for hydrogen transport phenomena occurring within various types of oxides and minerals having layered structures.
The method was previously characterized as sensitive for analysing the transport frequency and distance of highly diffusive hydrogen atoms or water molecules in condensed matter. Here are shown the results of its application to analyse the transport of much slower hydrogen atoms which are bonded into a as hydroxyls. Two types of hydrogen transport process were observed in brucite, Mg(OH)Keywords: hydrogen transport; quasielastic neutron scattering; QENS; hydrous minerals; brucite; transmission electron microscopy.
1. Introduction
Atomic scale hydrogen transport processes occurring within the crystal lattices of oxides and minerals are important factors controlling the kinetic behaviour of their hydration and dehydration reactions, and affecting the physical properties of the reaction products. Brucite, Mg(OH)2, is a hydroxide having the prototypical layered structure and so is ideal for studying the consequences of such hydrogen transport phenomena (Fig. 1). The structure has been proved to be stable over a broad range of pressure and temperature (Kruger et al., 1989; Parise et al., 1994; Partin et al., 1994; Desgranges et al., 1996; Horita et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2013; Okuchi et al., 2014), and hydrogen transport parameters have been extensively studied in previous work (Freund & Hösen, 1977; Freund & Wengeler, 1980; Gasc et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2013). The consequences of the hydrogen transport processes in brucite have also been extensively studied using and significant evidence of hydrogen transport has been observed within the such as lamellar dehydroxylation and rehydroxylation textures (Anderson & Horlock, 1962; McKelvy et al., 2001; Gomez-Villalba et al., 2016; Pimminger et al., 2016). Controlling such textures is essential for the industrial applications of the oxide produced after of brucite (Shand, 2006; Gomez-Villalba et al., 2017). Therefore, the hydrogen transport processes in brucite are considered an important subject for in-depth analysis.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and electrical conductivity (EC) measurements are known to be effective for analysing the transport of hydrogen in situ. A recent NMR study reported that a fraction of the hydrogen in brucite was diffusible at temperatures higher than 260 K; the molar fraction of such diffusible hydrogen gradually increased with increasing temperature and reached about one-hundredth of the total hydrogen atoms at 355 K, where the NMR measurements were terminated (Itoh & Isobe, 2016). Furthermore, previous EC results on brucite collectively indicated that it transforms into an ionic conductor at higher temperatures than ∼440 K (Freund & Hösen, 1977; Freund & Wengeler, 1980). Such diffusible hydrogen species were named `extrinsic protons' or `defect protons', but their transport process has not yet been clarified. The poor characterization of transport processes is due to a lack of information on the local structure where these protons are transferred. Here, we analyse such local transport processes using quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS), which is another distinguished method known to be potentially sensitive to the transport frequency and transport geometry of hydrogen. To the best of our knowledge, this method has not yet been applied to chemically bonded hydrogen as hydroxyls in a crystal lattice.
2. Experimental strategy and procedures
2.1. QENS analysis of slow hydrogen transport
Analysis of diffusive hydrogen in condensed matter has been a principal research target of the QENS method (Springer, 1972; Bee, 1988). A typical example is its application to solid-state proton conductors (Malavasi et al., 2010; Karlsson, 2015). The method has also been effectively applied to analyse the motion of molecular water adsorbed into clays and zeolites, which is known to actively exchange with bulk water and is therefore highly mobile (Swenson et al., 2000; Malikova et al., 2006; Martins et al., 2014). Another application was recently reported for water dissolving within high-temperature magmas (Yang et al., 2017). Notably, the large of incident neutrons by these diffusive hydrogen species makes the analysis rather straightforward. In contrast, the transport of covalently bonded hydrogen as hydroxyls within the crystal lattices of minerals has never been analysed by QENS, which is primarily because the and scattering intensity have been considered too small to be a subject for such analysis. Recently, a high-resolution inelastic spectrometer was established with a drastically improved sensitivity, where a novel optical design for increasing the signal-to-background ratio was effectively coupled with a strong pulsed neutron source (Shibata et al., 2015). We consider that such an advanced spectrometer could be effective to analyse the slow transport of hydroxyl hydrogens within the of Mg(OH)2.
2.2. QENS experimental procedures
A commercial reagent of pure brucite powder with 0.07 µm nominal grain size [Wako Chemicals 139-13951, ≥99.9% in weight as Mg(OH)2] was selected to be analysed. For QENS measurements at temperatures from 180 to 330 K, 0.41 g of the reagent sample was collected and dried at 383 K in air for 1 h to remove surface-adsorbed molecular water. For QENS measurements at 430 K, 0.49 g of the reagent sample was collected and dried in a vacuum at 500 K for 1 h. These samples were separately wrapped in commercial aluminium foil (∼10 µm thick) to maintain a reagent thin-walled annular geometry in bulk. Such a geometry is effective in minimizing multiple scattering of neutrons during QENS measurements. Each foil-wrapped sample was placed in an air-tight cylinder container made of pure aluminium with a thickness of 0.25 mm and an inner diameter of 14.0 mm. Then, each cylinder container was mechanically sealed using a pure aluminium cap with a stainless steel O-ring and eight stainless steel cap screws, which was hand-fixed within a glove bag filled with dry helium gas (Fukushima et al., 2018). The sealed container was then installed in a top-loading-type cryo-furnace to maintain sample temperature control during measurements.
The QENS measurements were conducted using the near-backscattering spectrometer DNA, which is installed at the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC), Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility (MLF) (Shibata et al., 2015). The incident pulsed neutron beam was shaped at the chopper, scattered at the sample, filtered at the Si(111) analyser array to reach a final energy E = = 2084 µeV, and detected. The counter-rotating pulse-shaping choppers were set with 30 mm slit width at the open position, which provided an energy resolution of 3.6 µeV full width at half-maximum (FWHM), and an energy scan window range from −30 to 100 µeV. The total scattering function, S(Q, ω), was determined by measuring the two described samples at 180–330 and 430 K, respectively. The total resolution function, R(Q, ω), of each sample was also determined at 50 K, where we assumed that all hydrogen dynamics were frozen. The R(Q, ω) function was used for deconvolution of the instrumental function. A typical measurement duration to obtain these S(Q, ω) and R(Q, ω) functions was half a day at 300 kW proton beam power. Another cylinder container with an empty foil without a sample was measured at 300 K to subtract the background from the container. All neutron scattering event data were reduced using the Utsusemi software (Inamura et al., 2013). The analysed Q [momentum transfer; Q = (4π/λ)sin(θ/2), where θ is the scattering angle and λ is the wavelength of the incident radiation] range was from 0.10 to 1.90 Å−1. A small positive Bragg reflection anomaly was induced by the large d spacing of brucite (d001 = 4.77 Å at 300 K), which appeared around Q = 1.32 Å−1; therefore, the range 1.30 ≤ Q ≤ 1.35 Å−1 was excluded from the analysis. The resolution of the momentum transfer was ΔQ ≃ 0.04 Å−1 around Q = 1.32 Å−1, so that the remaining Q range was little affected by the Bragg reflection. Except for hydrogen, all nuclei in the sample (Mg and O) induced negligible intensity because of their much smaller incoherent neutron scattering lengths. Therefore, the reduced scattering function after subtracting the container background consisted solely of of hydrogen in the brucite which involves scattering of both immobile and mobile fractions of hydrogen.
2.3. analysis
To confirm the crystallographic properties and grain-size distribution of the described samples, the reagent was analysed by
(TEM). A small fraction of the reagent powder was heated at 383 or 523 K for 20 h in a vacuum and subsequently observed by TEM. Each powder sample was dispersed in ethanol, and the supernatants of the slurries were added dropwise onto Cu grids, each covered with a holey carbon film (Quantifoil). Each sample was then examined using a JEOL JEM-ARM-200F transmission electron microscope operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV at the Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research of the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology.3. Results
3.1. QENS results and analysis
Fig. 2 shows representative scattering functions with some limited Q ranges. Except for the case at 180 K, the narrow elastic component of static hydrogen and the broad quasielastic component of mobile hydrogen were detected simultaneously. The former component consisted of a delta function, δ(ω), while the latter component consisted of one or more Lorentz functions, L[Γn(Q), ω], where Γn is the half-width at half-maximum, HWHM, of the nth function, and ω = . Note that upon detection these functions were convoluted with the relevant resolution function involving the instrumental effects. As indicated by the previous NMR measurements for brucite, the broad quasielastic component had a much smaller scattering intensity than the narrow elastic component, so that the enhanced spectrometer sensitivity was essential to detect the former component.
To induce such a QENS effect within a well ordered crystalline lattice, hydrogen is chemically bonded to its crystallographic site and also jumps to another site through one or more transport processes on the atomic scale. Then, the scattering function at a near-fixed Q (Qfix) is described as follows (Bee, 1988; Springer, 1972; Shibata et al., 2015; Seto et al., 2017):
The 〈u2〉 term is the mean-square displacement (or atomic displacement parameter), and AD, A1 and A2 are the area intensities of the delta function and first and second Lorentz functions, respectively. Owing to signal-to-noise ratio limitations, we constrain the number of Lorentz functions to be one or two. BG is a flat background mainly coming from phonon scattering. Some of these parameters change significantly with Q; therefore, to apply this relationship, S(Q, ω) and R(Q, ω) were sectioned into a series of functions that cover the limited Q ranges.
Figs. 3 and 4 show Γn and An at different temperatures. They were optimized separately for each of the sectioned scattering functions with near-fixed Q, and then plotted altogether. The QENSfit software provided for the DNA spectrometer was used for these fits. At 180 K, the scattering function did not contain any resolvable Lorenz component (A1 = A2 = 0; Fig. 2a). At temperatures from 230 to 330 K, the scattering function contained one Lorenz component (A1 > 0, A2 = 0; Figs. 2b and 2c). At 430 K, the function contained two Lorentz components (A1 > 0, A2 > 0; Fig. 2d).
For further analysis, we focus on the observed oscillating feature of A1 as a function of Q (Fig. 4), which is evidence of a localized transport process between a few distinct hydrogen sites, such as hydrogen's motion during molecular reorientations [ch. 6 in the book by Bee (1988)]. Therefore, we adopted the simplest two-site jump model for the transport process, where hydrogen atoms move back and forth between two equivalent sites separated at a root-mean-square displacement dn (n = 1 or 2). Considering the Γ1 profiles as observed in Fig. 3, this model is indeed one of the most preferred, because the other jump models involving four or more sites inevitably induce large oscillations in the corresponding Γ profiles; the two- (or three-)site model certainly reproduces the relatively flat Γ profiles. We note that the analysis of dn is not affected very much by the selection of two or three sites, and also that the analysis of τn is independent of the selection of site numbers. Thus, it is reasonable to represent the hydrogen transport process by the simplest two-site model.
The hydrogen at the filled site oscillates around its equilibrium position for τn (n = 1 or 2) and then jumps over the distance dn into the empty site. The resulting equation is
where j0 is a Bessel function of zero order (Bee, 1988). To find dn at each temperature, the model An functions given in equation (2) were fitted to the observed values by adjusting dn (Fig. 4).
By taking into account that the root-mean-square displacement of the oscillation, 〈u2〉1/2, is much smaller than that of the jump, another equation is deduced,
which is effective for Qd > 1 (Springer, 1972). The value of τn−1 was calculated using this equation and plotted as a function of reciprocal temperature (Fig. 5), where the activation energy of hydrogen transport was evaluated. Table 1 summarizes τn, dn and the fractional intensity of An compared with the total intensity Atotal = AD + A1 + A2.
|
3.2. TEM results
Fig. 6 shows transmission electron micrographs and corresponding (SAED) patterns of the brucite powder samples. The grain sizes were measured for 50 grains in each fraction heated at 383 and 523 K. They ranged from 40 to 200 nm and were indistinguishable between these fractions. From the SAED patterns, all sample grains had a confirmed good crystalline brucite structure, so that the hydrogen transport processes analysed by QENS occurred within the crystalline lattice. By referring to these TEM results, we excluded the possibility of irreversible degradation of the brucite structure with increasing temperature.
4. Discussion
It is confirmed that a fraction of hydrogen in the brucite lattice is diffusible even at 230 K, although this is ∼400 K lower than the dehydration temperature (Garn et al., 1978; Shand, 2006). The occurrence of such diffusible hydrogen in brucite in this temperature regime had been repeatedly proposed on the basis of NMR studies, but evidence for details of the transport process was scarce (Saito & Kotera, 1963; Sears et al., 1988; Itoh & Isobe, 2016). Because the reported activation energy of hydrogen transport (0.082 eV; Itoh & Isobe, 2016) was almost comparable to that determined by QENS in the current study (0.061 eV; Fig. 5), we conclude that both NMR and QENS methods are sensitive to the same transport process, which is proved to be active down to at least 230 K. The process observed by NMR had been thought to be facilitated by some lattice defects, because its activation energy was very much smaller than that of proton-induced electronic conduction through the regular crystalline lattice of Mg(OH)2 (Freund & Wengeler, 1980; Itoh & Isobe, 2016). In this latest work, we have now obtained the jump distance d1 = 2.9 Å of the defect-related transport process at 230 K. This distance indicates that the transport first occurs between the two closest hydrogen sites within a single OH− layer of the brucite lattice (3.14 Å at 200 K). There is no other geometry for hydrogen to jump across such a distance. In addition, the observed d1 at 280 and 330 K increases with increasing temperature, reaching the second-closest (d = 5.4 Å), third-closest (d = 6.3 Å) and even more distant sites within the same OH− layer of brucite. As the jump distance increases with increasing temperature from 230 to 330 K, so the jump frequency τ1 also increases smoothly and continuously, from which we have reconfirmed that the transport process for d1 and τ1 is definable by a single activation-energy process. We have two possibilities to describe this lattice-defect-facilitated transport process, which is either excess-proton transport or proton-defect transport. While the protons in the former process feel a proton–proton repulsive interaction during transport, the protons in the latter process rather feel a proton–defect attractive interaction. Therefore, with the former process, it is much easier for the protons to jump longer distances. The process in brucite is most probably the excess-proton type, as this was previously observed to induce proton conductivity in another layered hydrous mineral, kaolinite (Maiti & Freund, 1981).
The activation energy of electrical conductivity in dry brucite is around 1.0 eV (Freund & Hösen, 1977; Freund & Wengeler, 1980; Gasc et al., 2011), which is far larger than that of the transport process responsible for τ1 and d1. We also note that such conductivity in brucite has been observed only at temperatures beyond 440 K. To address this issue in more depth, the QENS result at the comparable temperature (430 K) is particularly valuable; it suggests the emergence of another transport process, with a τ2 and a jump distance d2 that are significantly different from τ1 and d1. In particular, d2 cannot be comparable to or larger than 3.14 Å (Fig. 5), which indicates that hydrogen transport through this second process occurs from one hydroxyl (OH−) layer to the other (opposing) OH− layer. This conclusion is based on the distance of 1.93 Å between the two closest interlayer sites, which is the only candidate with such a short jump distance; the fitting curve of A2 with d2 = 1.93 Å shows quantitative consistency with this conclusion. While such a process has never been scanned by NMR, it was possible to detect it in the EC measurements, where it was considered to be the motion of a negatively charged point defect of the proton (H′) (Freund & Wengeler, 1980). Such a proton defect is formed from an OH−, together with the production of an excess proton. The excess proton may quickly diffuse out, while the remaining proton defect slowly moves step by step by receiving another proton from its closest OH− that belongs to the other (opposing) layer. Because of the large activation energy required to remove the proton from OH−, this process would not be observed by QENS at temperatures lower than 430 K (Fig. 5). We also note that the observed Γ1 at 430 K was almost as large as the energy scan window range of the spectrometer, so that τ1−1 at this temperature was relatively uncertain; however, this observation does not preclude τ1−1 non-continuously increasing from temperatures lower than 330 K. The activation of defect motion would produce this result because that motion simultaneously rearranges the OH− dipole orientation distributions of the two opposing OH− layers, i.e. the layers the defect moves from and to, by changing the electrostatic interaction between the point charge and surrounding dipoles. This rearrangement may further stimulate the relevant transport process for τ1−1 within these two layers.
5. Conclusions
It has been demonstrated that QENS analysis of hydrogen in the crystal structures of minerals is uniquely effective in elucidating the frequency and geometry of its transport processes. Because of the prototypical structure of brucite consisting of layered hydrogen lattices, its analysis using QENS provides information that may be applicable to hydrogen transport processes occurring in a variety of oxides and minerals having similar structures. For example, the hydrogen-site geometry in a high-density mineral existing in the Earth's deep mantle (dense hydrous magnesium silicate phase E, nominal composition ∼ Mg2SiO2(OH)4, ; Tomioka et al., 2016) is very close to that of brucite compressed along its c axis (Parise et al., 1994; Okuchi et al., 2014). By isotope diffusion analysis, it has been proved that the rate of hydrogen transport in brucite increases with compression (Guo et al., 2013), so it is expected that hydrogen transport in this deep-Earth mineral can also be accelerated to be detectable by QENS. We are working on systematic syntheses and subsequent QENS analyses of such deep-Earth minerals (Okuchi et al., 2015), which have preestablished hydrogen-site geometries from neutron diffraction studies (Sano-Furukawa et al., 2011; Purevjav et al., 2014, 2016, 2018; Tomioka et al., 2016).
Acknowledgements
T. Yamada at the CROSS Neutron Science and Technology Center, J-PARC, is acknowledged for technical support.
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (award No. 15K13593 to TO; award No. 17H01172 to TO and NT). Part of the research conducted at J-PARC was through the MLF User Program (grant Nos. 2015I0002, 2016I0002, 2016B0159, 2017A0166 and 2017B0176).
References
Anderson, P. J. & Horlock, R. F. (1962). Trans. Faraday Soc. 58, 1993–2004. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Bee, M. (1988). Quasielastic Neutron Scattering, Principles and Applications in Solid State Chemistry, Biology and Materials Science. Bristol, Philaelphia: Adam Hilger. Google Scholar
Chakoumakos, B. C., Horita, J. & Garlea, V. O. (2013). Am. Mineral. 98, 1–6. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Desgranges, L., Calvarin, G. & Chevrier, G. (1996). Acta Cryst. B52, 82–86. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Freund, F. & Hösen, R. (1977). Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 81, 39–43. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Freund, F. & Wengeler, H. (1980). Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 84, 866–873. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Fukushima, Y., Yamada, T., Tamura, K. & Shibata, K. (2018). Appl. Clay Sci. 155, 15–19. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Garn, P. D., Kawalec, B. & Chang, J. C. (1978). Thermochim. Acta, 26, 375–381. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Gasc, J., Brunet, F., Bagdassarov, N. & Morales-Flórez, V. (2011). Phys. Chem. Miner. 38, 543–556. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Gomez-Villalba, L. S., Sierra-Fernandez, A., Milosevic, O., Fort, R. & Rabanal, M. E. (2017). Adv. Powder Technol. 28, 61–72. Google Scholar
Gomez-Villalba, L. S., Sierra-Fernandez, A., Rabanal, M. E. & Fort, R. (2016). Ceram. Int. 42, 9455–9466. Google Scholar
Guo, X. Z., Yoshino, T., Okuchi, T. & Tomioka, N. (2013). Am. Mineral. 98, 1919–1929. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Horita, J., dos Santos, A., Tulk, C., Chakoumakos, B. & Polyakov, V. (2010). Phys. Chem. Miner. 37, 741–749. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Inamura, Y., Nakatani, T., Suzuki, J. & Otomo, T. (2013). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 82, SA031. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Itoh, Y. & Isobe, M. (2016). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 85, 034602. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Karlsson, M. (2015). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 26–38. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kruger, M. B., Williams, Q. & Jeanloz, R. (1989). J. Chem. Phys. 91, 5910–5915. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Maiti, G. C. & Freund, F. (1981). Clay Miner. 16, 395–413. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Malavasi, L., Fisher, C. A. J. & Islam, M. S. (2010). Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 4370–4387. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Malikova, N., Cadène, A., Marry, V., Dubois, E. & Turq, P. (2006). J. Phys. Chem. B, 110, 3206–3214. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Martins, M. L., Gates, W. P., Michot, L., Ferrage, E., Marry, V. & Bordallo, H. N. (2014). Appl. Clay Sci. 96, 22–35. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
McKelvy, M. J., Sharma, R., Chizmeshya, A. V. G., Carpenter, R. W. & Streib, K. (2001). Chem. Mater. 13, 921–926. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Okuchi, T., Purevjav, N., Tomioka, N., Lin, J. F., Kuribayashi, T., Schoneveld, L., Hwang, H., Sakamoto, N., Kawasaki, N. & Yurimoto, H. (2015). Am. Mineral. 100, 1483–1492. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Okuchi, T., Tomioka, N., Purevjav, N., Abe, J., Harjo, S. & Gong, W. (2014). High. Pressure Res. 34, 273–280. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Parise, J. B., Leinenweber, K., Weidner, D. J., Tan, K. & Von Dreele, R. B. (1994). Am. Mineral. 79, 193–196. Google Scholar
Partin, D. E., O'Keefe, M. & Von Dreele, R. B. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 581–584. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Pimminger, H., Habler, G., Freiberger, N. & Abart, R. (2016). Phys. Chem. Miner. 43, 59–68. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Purevjav, N., Okuchi, T., Tomioka, N., Abe, J. & Harjo, S. (2014). Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6718–6724. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Purevjav, N., Okuchi, T., Tomioka, N., Wang, X. P. & Hoffmann, C. (2016). Sci. Rep. 6, 34988. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Purevjav, N., Okuchi, T., Wang, X., Hoffmann, C. & Tomioka, N. (2018). Acta Cryst. B74, 115–120. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Saito, T. & Kotera, Y. (1963). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 36, 474–475. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Sano-Furukawa, A., Kuribayashi, T., Komatsu, K., Yagi, T. & Ohtani, E. (2011). Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 189, 56–62. CAS Google Scholar
Sears, R. E. J., Kaliaperumal, R. & Manogaran, S. (1988). J. Chem. Phys. 88, 2284–2288. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Seto, H., Itoh, S., Yokoo, T., Endo, H., Nakajima, K., Shibata, K., Kajimoto, R., Ohira-Kawamura, S., Nakamura, M., Kawakita, Y., Nakagawa, H. & Yamada, T. (2017). Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1861, 3651–3660. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Shand, M. A. (2006). The Chemistry and Technology of Magnesia. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
Shibata, K., Takahashi, N., Kawakita, Y., Matsuura, M., Yamada, T., Tominaga, T., Kambara, W., Kobayashi, M., Inamura, Y., Nakatani, T., Nakajima, K. & Arai, M. (2015). JPS Conf. Proc. 8, 036022. Google Scholar
Springer, T. (1972). Quasielastic Neutron Scattering for the Diffusive Motions in Solids and Liquids. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Swenson, J., Bergman, R. & Howells, W. S. (2000). J. Chem. Phys. 113, 2873–2879. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Tomioka, N., Okuchi, T., Purevjav, N., Abe, J. & Harjo, S. (2016). Phys. Chem. Miner. 43, 267–275. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Xu, H. W., Zhao, Y. S., Hickmott, D. D., Lane, N. J., Vogel, S. C., Zhang, J. Z. & Daemen, L. L. (2013). Phys. Chem. Miner. 40, 799–810. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Yang, F., Hess, K. U., Unruh, T., Mamontov, E., Dingwell, D. B. & Meyer, A. (2017). Chem. Geol. 461, 152–159. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.