Figure 4
Evaluation of the optimal bin width and error scaling as a function of total detector counts n. (a) Comparison between the Freedman–Diaconis bin width (black circles) and the instrument-limited pixel size (red line) for the PEG-b-PLAyne-b-PLA triblock copolymer solution measured at HANARO. A crossover near marks the transition where approaches the instrumental resolution. The inset shows the measured
I(Q) for the shortest ( ) and longest ( ) acquisitions. (b) Mean-squared error obtained from data binned at (red), at the FD optimum (black) and after GP refinement (blue). Dashed lines indicate and scaling, and the shaded region marks the theoretical lower bound. (c) Relative improvement , showing that GP postprocessing (blue) further reduces the mean-squared error compared with direct binning (red) and the FD-optimized result (black). |