view article

Figure 4
Evaluation of the optimal bin width and error scaling as a function of total detector counts n. (a) Comparison between the Freedman–Diaconis bin width Mathematical equation (black circles) and the instrument-limited pixel size Mathematical equation (red line) for the PEG-b-PLAyne-b-PLA triblock copolymer solution measured at HANARO. A crossover near Mathematical equation marks the transition where Mathematical equation approaches the instrumental resolution. The inset shows the measured I(Q) for the shortest (Mathematical equation) and longest (Mathematical equation) acquisitions. (b) Mean-squared error Mathematical equation obtained from data binned at Mathematical equation (red), at the FD optimum (black) and after GP refinement (blue). Dashed lines indicate Mathematical equation and Mathematical equation scaling, and the shaded region marks the theoretical lower bound. (c) Relative improvement Mathematical equation, showing that GP postprocessing (blue) further reduces the mean-squared error compared with direct binning (red) and the FD-optimized result (black).

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds