addenda and errata
The RAPTR furnace: a rapid heating and cooling sample furnace for in situ X-ray scattering studies of temperature-induced reactions. Corrigendum
aDepartment of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3400, USA, and bSchool of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
Errors in the article by Hu et al. [J. Appl. Cryst. (2024), 57, 88–93] are corrected.
Keywords: sample environments; in situ X-ray scattering; solid-state reactions; kinetics; high temperature.
For the article by Hu et al. (2024
), errors in the structural models fitted to the diffraction data for an example solid-state reaction are corrected. The corrections are confined to Section 5 of that article, which illustrates an application of the RAPTR furnace. A revised version of this section is provided below, together with the corrected Fig. 6.
For the reaction of PbO and WO3, the WO3 polymorph present at the reaction temperature was incorrectly modelled as the β polymorph rather than α-WO3. In addition, the reaction intermediate was misidentified as Pb3WO6 instead of Pb2WO5. These errors affected the quantitative phase analysis, reported reaction evolution and mechanistic details.
5. Capturing the fast solid-state reaction of PbO and WO3
The synthesis of the scheelite-type PbWO4 was evaluated as a model stoichiometric solid-state reaction (PbO + WO3 → PbWO4). Traditionally, scheelite-type oxides are synthesized via conventional solid-state synthesis routes, heating in air at high temperatures (700–900°C) for long time periods (>2 h) (Mullens et al., 2023
). Both Pb and W are heavy elements, and as such are expected to be relatively immobile, such that a slow reaction would be anticipated. An initial test reaction undertaken ex situ by heating a stoichiometric mixture of PbO (Puratronic, 99.999%) and WO3 (NanoAmor, 99.9+%) at 750°C in air in a muffle furnace for 12 h yielded scheelite-type PbWO4 as a phase-pure product.
Stoichiometric quantities of reagents were mixed and formed into pellets (∼70% packing density) to optimize contact between particles, before loading into the 1.1 mm OD SiO2 glass capillary (Kamm et al., 2022
). Capillary-loaded reaction mixtures were assembled within the RAPTR furnace, and fast time-resolved X-ray diffraction data were collected at beamline 11-ID-B of the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory (λ = 0.2116 Å, sample-to-detector distance ≃ 1.0 m) following translation of the mixture into the hot zone at 750°C. Data were collected with 1 s exposures during the first minute following translation, and then at increasing intervals at longer times: 2 s exposures (1–2 min), 5 s exposures (2–4 min), 10 s exposures (4–6 min), 30 s exposures (6–10 min), matching the data density to the anticipated rate of change for the reaction.
The time-resolved in situ diffraction data acquired following rapid heating to initiate the reaction using the RAPTR furnace showed that the solid-state synthesis of PbWO4 proceeds via three steps (Fig. 1
):
| Figure 1 [Revised version of Fig. 6 of Hu et al. (2024 |
At room temperature, a three-phase mixture of α-PbO (P4/nmm, a ≃ 3.9 Å, c ≃ 5.0 Å), β-PbO (Pbcm, a ≃ 5.9 Å, b ≃ 5.5 Å, c ≃ 4.8 Å) and γ-WO3 (P21/n, a ≃ 7.3 Å, b ≃ 7.5 Å, c ≃ 7.7 Å) is observed. During the first 10 s, as the reaction mixture heats to 750°C, WO3 undergoes a series of structural phase transitions – P21/n (γ) to Pcnb (β, a ≃ 7.4 Å, b ≃ 7.6 Å, c ≃ 7.8 Å) to P4/ncc (α, a ≃ 5.3 Å, c ≃ 7.8 Å) – which are known to occur between 300 and 350°C, and between 720 and 850°C (Vogt et al., 1999
), respectively. Crystalline PbO peaks disappear in tandem with the formation of crystalline products and an increase in diffuse scattering, either from disorder within the crystalline product or from a mixed PbO–WO3 melt (pure PbO melts at 888°C and pure WO3 melts at 1473°C). At 750°C, indicates that three phases are present: WO3 (P4/ncc), the PbWO4 product (I41/a) and an additional crystalline intermediate, which was determined to be Pb2WO5 (C2/m , a ≃ 14.3 Å, b ≃ 5.9 Å, c ≃ 7.6 Å, β ≃ 114°). The amount of WO3 and Pb2WO5 decreased as the PbWO4 product increased. The consumption of WO3 and Pb2WO5 to form the PbWO4 product occurs most rapidly in the early stages of reaction and gradually slows, with more than half the PbWO4 product formed within the first 30 s. After 5 min, peaks from PbWO4 are observed as a near-phase-pure reaction product.
The Pb-rich intermediate Pb2WO5 phase observed here is a metastable, kinetic product which would most likely have been overlooked in conventional experiments (Jantz et al., 2017
). In this phase, lead oxide layers, consisting of edge- and face-sharing 7- and 9-coordinate polyhedra, are connected by WO4 tetrahedra.
We note that the initial phase that forms, the Pb2WO5 phase, is richer in the lower valent, more mobile cation than the final product (i.e. Pb). That is, the Pb2WO5 intermediate has a higher Pb2+:W6+ ratio than the PbWO4 product. This may suggest that cations from the more mobile species diffuse or insert into other phases faster than they redistribute. This observation leads to pertinent questions on how the reaction kinetics and stoichiometry of intermediates depend on the relative mobility of ions within the target product.
Related literature. The following references are cited only in the supporting information: Bush et al. (2023
), Coelho (2018
), Dinnebier et al. (2018
), Jantz et al. (2020
), Kaurova et al. (2016
), Moreau et al. (1996
), Moreau et al. (1999
), Takai et al. (2004
), Tatsumi (1997
), Triantafyllou et al. (1997
), Wang et al. (2012
), Zagorac et al. (2019
).
Supporting information
Includes diffraction data, fits and description of workflow. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576726003109/oc5051sup1.pdf
Footnotes
‡These authors contributed equally.
Funding information
The following funding is acknowledged: US Department of Energy, Office of Science (award No. DE-SC0019212).
References
Bush, A. A., Kozlov, V. I., Stash, A. I. & Ivanov, S. A. (2023). J. Struct. Chem. 64, 97–111. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Coelho, A. A. (2018). J. Appl. Cryst. 51, 210–218. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Dinnebier, R. E., Leineweber, A. & Evans, J. S. O. (2018). Rietveld Refinement: Practical Powder Diffraction Pattern Analysis Using TOPAS. De Gruyter. Google Scholar
Hu, D., Beauvais, M. L., Mullens, B. G., Sanchez Monserrate, B. A., Vornholt, S. M., Kamm, G. E., Ferrari, J. J., Chupas, P. J. & Chapman, K. W. (2024). J. Appl. Cryst. 57, 88–93. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Jantz, S. G., Pielnhofer, F., Dialer, M. & Höppe, H. A. (2017). Z. Anorg. Allge Chem. 643, 2031–2037. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jantz, S. G., Pielnhofer, F. & Höppe, H. A. (2020). Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 235, 311–317. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kamm, G. E., Huang, G., Vornholt, S. M., McAuliffe, R. D., Veith, G. M., Thornton, K. S. & Chapman, K. W. (2022). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 11975–11979. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kaurova, I. A., Kuz'micheva, G. M., Brykovskiy, A. A., Rybakov, V. B., Gorobets, Y. N., Shekhovtsov, A. N. & Cousson, A. (2016). Mater. Des. 97, 56–63. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Moreau, J. M., Galez, P., Peigneux, J. P. & Korzhik, M. V. (1996). J. Alloys Compd. 238, 46–48. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Moreau, J. M., Gladyshevskii, R. E., Galez, P., Peigneux, J. P. & Korzhik, M. V. (1999). J. Alloys Compd. 284, 104–107. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mullens, B. G., Nicholas, M. K., Marlton, F. P., Brand, H. E. A., Gu, Q., Maynard-Casely, H. E. & Kennedy, B. J. (2023). J. Solid State Chem. 321, 123871. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD Google Scholar
Takai, S., Nakanishi, T., Oikawa, K., Torii, S., Hoshikawa, A., Kamiyama, T. & Esaka, T. (2004). Solid State Ionics 170, 297–304. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tatsumi, K. (1997). Solid State Ionics 96, 35–40. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Triantafyllou, S. T., Christidis, P. C. & Lioutas, C. B. (1997). J. Solid State Chem. 130, 176–183. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Vogt, T., Woodward, P. M. & Hunter, B. A. (1999). J. Solid State Chem. 144, 209–215. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Wang, H., Chen, H.-H., Borrmann, H., Zhang, Z.-J. & Zhao, J.-T. (2012). J. Alloys Compd. 545, 135–138. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Zagorac, D., Müller, H., Ruehl, S., Zagorac, J. & Rehme, S. (2019). J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 918–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This article is published by the International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

journal menu



