addenda and errata\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767

The RAPTR furnace: a rapid heating and cooling sample furnace for in situ X-ray scattering studies of temperature-induced reactions. Corrigendum

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3400, USA, and bSchool of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by S. Moggach, The University of Western Australia, Australia (Received 23 January 2026; accepted 23 March 2026; online 8 May 2026)

Errors in the article by Hu et al. [J. Appl. Cryst. (2024), 57, 88–93] are corrected.

For the article by Hu et al. (2024View full citation), errors in the structural models fitted to the diffraction data for an example solid-state reaction are corrected. The corrections are confined to Section 5 of that article, which illustrates an application of the RAPTR furnace. A revised version of this section is provided below, together with the corrected Fig. 6.

For the reaction of PbO and WO3, the WO3 polymorph present at the reaction temperature was incorrectly modelled as the β polymorph rather than α-WO3. In addition, the reaction intermediate was misidentified as Pb3WO6 instead of Pb2WO5. These errors affected the quantitative phase analysis, reported reaction evolution and mechanistic details.

5. Capturing the fast solid-state reaction of PbO and WO3

The synthesis of the scheelite-type PbWO4 was evaluated as a model stoichiometric solid-state reaction (PbO + WO3 → PbWO4). Traditionally, scheelite-type oxides are synthesized via conventional solid-state synthesis routes, heating in air at high temperatures (700–900°C) for long time periods (>2 h) (Mullens et al., 2023View full citation). Both Pb and W are heavy elements, and as such are expected to be relatively immobile, such that a slow reaction would be anticipated. An initial test reaction undertaken ex situ by heating a stoichiometric mixture of PbO (Puratronic, 99.999%) and WO3 (NanoAmor, 99.9+%) at 750°C in air in a muffle furnace for 12 h yielded scheelite-type PbWO4 as a phase-pure product.

Stoichiometric quantities of reagents were mixed and formed into pellets (∼70% packing density) to optimize contact between particles, before loading into the 1.1 mm OD SiO2 glass capillary (Kamm et al., 2022View full citation). Capillary-loaded reaction mixtures were assembled within the RAPTR furnace, and fast time-resolved X-ray diffraction data were collected at beamline 11-ID-B of the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory (λ = 0.2116 Å, sample-to-detector distance ≃ 1.0 m) following translation of the mixture into the hot zone at 750°C. Data were collected with 1 s exposures during the first minute following translation, and then at increasing intervals at longer times: 2 s exposures (1–2 min), 5 s exposures (2–4 min), 10 s exposures (4–6 min), 30 s exposures (6–10 min), matching the data density to the anticipated rate of change for the reaction.

The time-resolved in situ diffraction data acquired following rapid heating to initiate the reaction using the RAPTR furnace showed that the solid-state synthesis of PbWO4 proceeds via three steps (Fig. 1[link]):

Mathematical equation

Mathematical equation

Mathematical equation

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
[Revised version of Fig. 6 of Hu et al. (2024View full citation).] Phase evolution during the reaction of PbO and WO3 at 750°C within the RAPTR furnace, from Rietveld refinement of the time-resolved powder diffraction data.

At room temperature, a three-phase mixture of α-PbO (P4/nmm, a ≃ 3.9 Å, c ≃ 5.0 Å), β-PbO (Pbcm, a ≃ 5.9 Å, b ≃ 5.5 Å, c ≃ 4.8 Å) and γ-WO3 (P21/n, a ≃ 7.3 Å, b ≃ 7.5 Å, c ≃ 7.7 Å) is observed. During the first 10 s, as the reaction mixture heats to 750°C, WO3 undergoes a series of structural phase transitions – P21/n (γ) to Pcnb (β, a ≃ 7.4 Å, b ≃ 7.6 Å, c ≃ 7.8 Å) to P4/ncc (α, a ≃ 5.3 Å, c ≃ 7.8 Å) – which are known to occur between 300 and 350°C, and between 720 and 850°C (Vogt et al., 1999View full citation), respectively. Crystalline PbO peaks disappear in tandem with the formation of crystalline products and an increase in diffuse scattering, either from disorder within the crystalline product or from a mixed PbO–WO3 melt (pure PbO melts at 888°C and pure WO3 melts at 1473°C). At 750°C, Rietveld refinement indicates that three phases are present: WO3 (P4/ncc), the PbWO4 product (I41/a) and an additional crystalline intermediate, which was determined to be Pb2WO5 (C2/m , a ≃ 14.3 Å, b ≃ 5.9 Å, c ≃ 7.6 Å, β ≃ 114°). The amount of WO3 and Pb2WO5 decreased as the PbWO4 product increased. The consumption of WO3 and Pb2WO5 to form the PbWO4 product occurs most rapidly in the early stages of reaction and gradually slows, with more than half the PbWO4 product formed within the first 30 s. After 5 min, peaks from PbWO4 are observed as a near-phase-pure reaction product.

The Pb-rich intermediate Pb2WO5 phase observed here is a metastable, kinetic product which would most likely have been overlooked in conventional experiments (Jantz et al., 2017View full citation). In this phase, lead oxide layers, consisting of edge- and face-sharing 7- and 9-coordinate polyhedra, are connected by WO4 tetrahedra.

We note that the initial phase that forms, the Pb2WO5 phase, is richer in the lower valent, more mobile cation than the final product (i.e. Pb). That is, the Pb2WO5 intermediate has a higher Pb2+:W6+ ratio than the PbWO4 product. This may suggest that cations from the more mobile species diffuse or insert into other phases faster than they redistribute. This observation leads to pertinent questions on how the reaction kinetics and stoichiometry of intermediates depend on the relative mobility of ions within the target product.

Related literature. The following references are cited only in the supporting information: Bush et al. (2023View full citation), Coelho (2018View full citation), Dinnebier et al. (2018View full citation), Jantz et al. (2020View full citation), Kaurova et al. (2016View full citation), Moreau et al. (1996View full citation), Moreau et al. (1999View full citation), Takai et al. (2004View full citation), Tatsumi (1997View full citation), Triantafyllou et al. (1997View full citation), Wang et al. (2012View full citation), Zagorac et al. (2019View full citation).

Supporting information


Footnotes

These authors contributed equally.

Funding information

The following funding is acknowledged: US Department of Energy, Office of Science (award No. DE-SC0019212).

References

Return to citationBush, A. A., Kozlov, V. I., Stash, A. I. & Ivanov, S. A. (2023). J. Struct. Chem. 64, 97–111.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationCoelho, A. A. (2018). J. Appl. Cryst. 51, 210–218.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationDinnebier, R. E., Leineweber, A. & Evans, J. S. O. (2018). Rietveld Refinement: Practical Powder Diffraction Pattern Analysis Using TOPAS. De Gruyter.  Google Scholar
Return to citationHu, D., Beauvais, M. L., Mullens, B. G., Sanchez Monserrate, B. A., Vornholt, S. M., Kamm, G. E., Ferrari, J. J., Chupas, P. J. & Chapman, K. W. (2024). J. Appl. Cryst. 57, 88–93.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationJantz, S. G., Pielnhofer, F., Dialer, M. & Höppe, H. A. (2017). Z. Anorg. Allge Chem. 643, 2031–2037.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationJantz, S. G., Pielnhofer, F. & Höppe, H. A. (2020). Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 235, 311–317.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKamm, G. E., Huang, G., Vornholt, S. M., McAuliffe, R. D., Veith, G. M., Thornton, K. S. & Chapman, K. W. (2022). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 11975–11979.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationKaurova, I. A., Kuz'micheva, G. M., Brykovskiy, A. A., Rybakov, V. B., Gorobets, Y. N., Shekhovtsov, A. N. & Cousson, A. (2016). Mater. Des. 97, 56–63.   CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMoreau, J. M., Galez, P., Peigneux, J. P. & Korzhik, M. V. (1996). J. Alloys Compd. 238, 46–48.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMoreau, J. M., Gladyshevskii, R. E., Galez, P., Peigneux, J. P. & Korzhik, M. V. (1999). J. Alloys Compd. 284, 104–107.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMullens, B. G., Nicholas, M. K., Marlton, F. P., Brand, H. E. A., Gu, Q., Maynard-Casely, H. E. & Kennedy, B. J. (2023). J. Solid State Chem. 321, 123871.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD Google Scholar
Return to citationTakai, S., Nakanishi, T., Oikawa, K., Torii, S., Hoshikawa, A., Kamiyama, T. & Esaka, T. (2004). Solid State Ionics 170, 297–304.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationTatsumi, K. (1997). Solid State Ionics 96, 35–40.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationTriantafyllou, S. T., Christidis, P. C. & Lioutas, C. B. (1997). J. Solid State Chem. 130, 176–183.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationVogt, T., Woodward, P. M. & Hunter, B. A. (1999). J. Solid State Chem. 144, 209–215.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWang, H., Chen, H.-H., Borrmann, H., Zhang, Z.-J. & Zhao, J.-T. (2012). J. Alloys Compd. 545, 135–138.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationZagorac, D., Müller, H., Ruehl, S., Zagorac, J. & Rehme, S. (2019). J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 918–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This article is published by the International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds