research papers
Current status of multilayer neutron interferometry with gaseous samples at J-PARC
aDepartment of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Aichi, Japan, bRIKEN Center for Advanced Photonics, Wako 351-0198, Saitama, Japan, cIndiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401, USA, dDepartment of Physics, Rikkyo University, Toshima 171-8501, Tokyo, Japan, eInstitute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science, Kyoto University, Kumatori 590-0494, Osaka, Japan, fHigh Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1106, Japan, gJ-PARC Center, 2-4 Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1165, Japan, hKobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Aichi, Japan, iResearch Center for Nuclear Physics, University of Osaka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan, and jInstitute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
This article is part of a collection of articles related to the International Conference on Neutron Scattering, ICNS2025.
Several few-body nuclear models, such as the Argonne v18 potential including three-nucleon forces and chiral effective field theories, predict the coherent scattering length (bc) for light nuclei. Reliable measurements of bc therefore provide important tests of these models. We have developed a measurement system for determining bc of gaseous samples using a multilayer-type neutron interferometer at J-PARC, and successfully observed the phase shifts of 3He and 4He gases. From the observed phase shifts, we obtained for 3He bc = 3.99 ± 0.23 (stat.) ± 0.66 (sys.) fm and for 4He bc = 2.95 ± 0.11 (stat.) ± 0.67 (sys.) fm (stat. and sys. denote statistical uncertainty and systematic uncertainty, respectively). To achieve higher precision, we are currently upgrading the experimental setup.
Keywords: few-body systems; neutron interferometers; scattering lengths.
1. Introduction
The coherent scattering length (bc) describes neutron s-wave scattering and is a key parameter for understanding few-body nuclear systems. Few-body nuclei such as 3He and 4He are described by several phenomenological models, including the Argonne v18 (AV18) potential with three-nucleon interactions (3N), the R matrix approach (Hofmann & Hale, 2003
) and chiral effective field theories (Bagnarol et al., 2023
), which predict bc.
Therefore, measurements of the bc of 3He and 4He (denoted hereafter as and
) can serve as benchmarks for studies of few-body nuclear systems.
Experimentally, bc values have been measured using several methods, including scattering cross-section measurements (Haddock et al., 2019
), reflectometry (Kitchens et al., 1974
), diffraction (Shull & Shaw, 1973
) and, most prominently, neutron interferometry (Ioffe et al., 1998
). For instance, the bc values of H and D, obtained using neutron interferometers (NIs) with relative precisions of 3.0 × 10−4 (Koester & Nistler, 1975
) and 4.5 × 10−4 (Schoen et al., 2003
), respectively, are consistent with the predictions of AV18 and AV18 with 3N. However, relative discrepancies of approximately 2 × 10−2 for and 7 × 10−3 for
persist among the latest measurements using Si crystal NIs.
We aim to resolve these discrepancies with a relative precision of 10−3 using pulsed neutrons and a multilayer-type NI. While bc for solid samples has already been measured using a multilayer-type NI, this paper reports its first application to gaseous samples with a newly fabricated gas cell. We present the results as a proof of principle for this method and discuss developments towards higher-precision experiments.
2. Experiment
A neutron interferometer splits a neutron wave into two paths and recombines them to produce interference. The potential difference between the two paths appears as a phase shift in the interference fringes. Since the first implementation in 1974 (Rauch et al., 1974
), NIs have found applications across diverse domains of physics (Colella et al., 1975
; Rauch et al., 1975
; Hasegawa et al., 2003
).
The phase shift Δϕ is described by
where m is the neutron mass, λ is the neutron wavelength, L is the interaction length with the potential, ΔE is the potential difference between the two paths and h is Planck's constant. The sensitivity of an NI is proportional to λ and L. Consequently, extending the path length of an NI and using a long wavelength enhances its sensitivity. A conventional NI made from an Si single crystal relies on Bragg scattering, which prevents its operation at λ longer than the Si lattice spacing. The interaction length L and the size of the NI are constrained by the dimensions over which high crystallinity can be maintained.
2.1. Multilayer neutron interferometer
We developed an NI using multilayer neutron mirrors. A multilayer neutron mirror consists of periodic layers of two materials (Ni/Ti) with different Fermi pseudo-potentials for neutrons. We can utilize cold neutrons which satisfy the reflection condition. Because the layer spacing is larger than the lattice spacing of an Si single crystal, neutrons with longer λ can be utilized than in a conventional NI. For the application of multilayer mirrors to a Jamin-type NI (shown in Fig. 1
), we used a pair of beam-splitting etalons (BSEs) (Kitaguchi et al., 2003
; Seki et al., 2010
). Each BSE is composed of two multilayer mirrors on SiO2 substrates, separated by an air gap of 211 µm.
|
|
Figure 1
Experimental setup of the Jamin-type NI employing beam-splitting etalons (BSEs). |
The NI with BSEs not only allows the extension of L but also enables the insertion of large samples that would be difficult to accommodate in a conventional NI, expanding the flexibility of the experimental setup. In the present measurement, a gas cell with a total width of 40 mm was inserted between the two paths, providing L = 8 mm. The value of L is potentially scalable up to 1000 mm.
2.2. Experimental setup
We conducted experiments on the low-divergence branch of the J-PARC beamline MLF BL05 (NOP) (Mishima et al., 2009
). The neutron wavelength used by a multilayer-type NI is determined by the time-of-flight (TOF) method, reducing time-varying disturbances in the analysis process. The multilayer-type NI and the sample insertion assembly were placed on a vibration isolation table inside a thermostatic chamber. To ensure the stability and alignment of the mirror substrates, the rotation of the entire NI and the relative angles between the two BSEs were precisely controlled and maintained using high-precision stepping motors. We observed an interferogram using pulsed neutrons (Fujiie et al., 2024
). The bandwidth of λ is from 0.9 to 1.1 nm. The phase determination accuracy was comparable to that of a conventional NI. In our previous work, we had already measured bc for several nuclei with solid samples and confirmed that these values were consistent with previous studies, except for V (Fujiie et al., 2024
).
2.3. Gas cell
For measuring the bc of gaseous samples, we designed a gas cell (shown in Fig. 2
) which was machined from pure aluminium alloy (A1050) at RIKEN. In bc measurements using an NI, one path passes through the sample while the other passes through a vacuum, thereby producing the phase shift. For a conventional NI, the centimetre-scale path separation allows the use of a two-chamber gas cell separated by a partition. However, in a multilayer-type NI, the beam separation is only 380 µm, so neutrons pass through the corner radius formed during fabrication, making it difficult to determine L through the gas region accurately.
|
|
Figure 2
Cross-section view of the gas cell. The red region contains the gaseous sample, while the green region is evacuated. |
To address this problem, recess machining was performed to create surfaces perpendicular to the neutron path. By creating a 1 mm extension in the x-axis direction, neutrons are directed perpendicularly onto the gaseous sample. Neutrons pass through the red region, 2 mm in Path 1 and 10 mm in Path 2; therefore the effective L contributing to the phase shift is 8 mm.
2.4. Experiment procedure and analysis
Measurements were repeated with and without the sample to minimize disturbances, as illustrated in Fig. 1
, with measurements taken every 10 min. We used a position-sensitive detector with time resolution, consisting of a resistance-division photomultiplier tube (RPMT) and a ZnS/6LiF scintillator. The detector was 0.3 m away from the interferometer setup (shown in Fig. 1
). The details are described by Hirota et al. (2005
).
The sample gases were filled at 50256 ± 6 Pa at 299.497 ± 0.06 K for 3He and at 100017 ± 10 Pa at 299.196 ± 0.06 K for 4He, measured by a piezoresistive transducer and a platinum resistance thermometer. The gas cell was evacuated by a turbo molecular pump to 3.00 × 10−3 Pa before filling, and the residual vacuum pressures before filling the gases were 1.00 × 10−2 Pa for 3He and 1.17 × 10−2 Pa for 4He. Table 1
summarizes the assessment of sample contamination. The levels were below the experimental uncertainty and therefore negligible for these measurements.
|
||||||||||
Figs. 3
and 4
show the interference fringes obtained over 10 min under conditions with the gas cell filled with 3He, 4He and evacuated, respectively, and with the gas cell inserted and removed from the beam path. In Figs. 3
and 4
, the vertical axis I(λ) is defined by
where IH and IO are the intensities of the O and H beams, respectively, and and
are those with a Cd block inserted. We fitted the obtained interference fringes using the fitting function
where A denotes the contrast of the interferogram. The coefficients PL and PR represent the inverse proportional and proportional terms, respectively, and they are derived by geometric optics (Fujiie et al., 2024
). Specifically, PR accounts for the phase shift contributed by the SiO2 substrate. The third term, PS = Nbct, is the interaction with the sample, where N is the number density of atoms and t is the sample thickness. The TOF region used for the fit was set from 37 to 49 ms, which corresponds to the reflecting momentum transfer range of the multilayer mirror, 0.232 < Q < 0.292 nm−1. Through relative measurements, PS was isolated as the difference between the wavelength-proportional terms with and without the sample. Scattering lengths were calculated from the phase shifts of each sample (shown in Fig. 3
) after subtracting the value obtained in the vacuum measurement (shown in Fig. 4
).
|
|
Figure 3
Interference fringes for (left) 3He and (right) 4He. Red and blue lines correspond to data with the cell out and in, respectively. Black lines indicate fits using equation (3) |
|
Figure 4
Interference fringes for the double-path vacuum measurement. Red and blue lines correspond to data with the cell out and in, respectively. Black lines indicate fits using equation (3) |
The extracted phase shifts were = 0.38 ± 0.022 (stat.) rad,
= 0.57 ± 0.022 (stat.) rad and ΔϕVac = 0.19 ± 0.015 (stat.) rad (where stat. means statistical uncertainty). Consequently, the results were
= 3.99 ± 0.23 (stat.) fm and
= 2.95 ± 0.11 (stat.) fm, with measurement times of 6 and 8 h, respectively. The relatively large statistical uncertainties were caused by a decrease in fringe contrast. The decrease in contrast caused by the insertion of the cell is attributed to small-angle scattering of neutrons by the 18 mm-thick (in total) aluminium wall (shown in Fig. 2
).
2.5. Uncertainties
The systematic uncertainties are summarized in Table 2
. The dominant systematic uncertainty is the phase distribution in the beam cross section, which is described below. In the condition with no cell, the phase of the interferogram in the TOF varied in the vertical position on the detector, indicating that the neutron phase was distributed along the y axis. We suspect that this effect was caused by a misalignment of the BSEs. We divided the data into three regions along the y axis and analysed each region to derive phase shifts, but the results were inconsistent. The systematic uncertainties arise from the weighted average taken for the three data points, expanding the error bar such that χ2/ndf = 1, where χ2 is the chi-squared parameter and ndf the number of degrees of freedom.
|
|||||||||||||||||
3. Results
Figs. 5
and 6
compare our results with previous work (Kitchens et al., 1974
; Kaiser et al., 1977
; Kaiser et al., 1979
; Alfimenkov et al., 1981
; Huffman et al., 2004
; Ketter et al., 2006
; McReynolds, 1951
; Genin et al., 1963
; Rorer et al., 1969
; Haddock et al., 2019
; Haun et al., 2020
). The methods used were cross section (CS), reflectivity (RE) and neutron interferometer (NI). Our results were = 3.99 ± 0.23 (stat.) ± 0.66 (sys.) fm and
= 2.95 ± 0.11 (stat.) ± 0.67 (sys.) fm (where sys. means systematic uncertainty). In this first gaseous sample measurement, a significant phase shift was successfully observed, and several issues in the experimental setup for future measurements were identified.
|
Figure 5
Comparison of measured |
|
Figure 6
Comparison of measured |
4. Discussion
The experimental results revealed a vertical phase distribution and temporal instability, leading to reduced visibility and an underestimation of the phase shift. We recently identified that this distribution stems primarily from the roll angle misalignment of the BSEs. Because these systematic effects have not yet been fully quantified, the actual uncertainty in these preliminary results is likely to be larger than that reported above. Furthermore, small-angle scattering from the aluminium degraded the contrast. To address these issues, we are upgrading the setup with high-rigidity stages and low-thermal-expansion materials.
5. Future prospects
To overcome the current limitations, we are preparing a new cell using SiO2 crystals to eliminate contrast degradation from small-angle scattering. We will also correct the BSE roll angle misalignment by making adjustments, and improve the stability by introducing more rigid components. Furthermore, introducing supermirrors optimized for the J-PARC MLF BL05 spectrum is expected to increase the neutron flux by a factor of 20. With these upgrades, and
can be measured with a relative precision of 10−3 in 6 and 20 h, respectively.
6. Summary
To study the few-body system in nuclei, we performed measurements of and
using a multilayer-type NI at J-PARC. The precision of bc was limited by statistical uncertainties due to the small-angle scattering from aluminium and setup-related systematic uncertainties. By integrating SiO2 cells, a high-rigidity stage and supermirror upgrades, we aim to achieve higher-accuracy measurements.
Acknowledgements
The neutron experiments at the Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility of J-PARC were performed under the user programme (proposal Nos. 2020A0226, 2020B0222, 2021B0109, 2022A0116, 2023B0816 and 2024A0214) and S-type projects of KEK IMSS (proposal No. 2019S03).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Data availability
The data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Funding information
This research was approved by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) (grant No. 21H01092). This work was financially supported by JST SPRING (grant No. JPMJSP2125) and by the RIKEN Junior Research Associate programme. Taro Nambu would like to thank the `THERS Make New Standards Program for the Next Generation Researchers'. Anna McElhannon and William M. Snow acknowledge support from the US National Science Foundation (grant No. PHY-2209481) and from the Indiana University Center for Spacetime Symmetries. Anna McElhannon acknowledges support from the Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need programme and from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
References
Alfimenkov, V. P., Borzakov, S. B., Van Tkhuan, V., Govorov, A. M., Lason, L., Pikel'ner, L. B. & Sharapov, E. A. (1981). Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 33, 467–471.
Google Scholar
Bagnarol, M., Schäfer, M., Bazak, B. & Barnea, N. (2023). Phys. Lett. B 844, 138078.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Colella, R., Overhauser, A. W. & Werner, S. A. (1975). Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1472–1474.
CrossRef
CAS
Web of Science
Google Scholar
Fujiie, T., Hino, M., Hosobata, T., Ichikawa, G., Kitaguchi, M., Mishima, K., Seki, Y., Shimizu, H. M. & Yamagata, Y. (2024). Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 023402.
CrossRef
PubMed
Google Scholar
Genin, R., Beil, H., Signarbieux, C., Carlos, P., Joly, R. & Ribrag, M. (1963). J. Phys. Radium 24, 21–26.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
Haddock, C. C., Hiromoto, M., Hirota, K., Ino, T., Kitaguchi, M., Mishima, K., Oi, N., Shima, T., Shimizu, H. M., Snow, W. M. & Yoshioka, T. (2019). Phys. Rev. C 100, 064002.
Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Y., Loidl, R., Badurek, G., Baron, M. & Rauch, H. (2003). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 72, 42–45.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Haun, R., Wietfeldt, F. E., Arif, M., Huber, M. G., Black, T. C., Heacock, B., Pushin, D. A. & Shahi, C. B. (2020). Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 012501.
Google Scholar
Hirota, K., Shinohara, T., Ikeda, K., Mishima, K., Adachi, T., Morishima, T., Satoh, S., Oku, T., Yamada, S., Sasao, H., Suzuki, J. & Shimizu, H. M. (2005). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 1836.
CrossRef
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. M. & Hale, G. M. (2003). Phys. Rev. C. 68, 021002.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Huffman, P. R., Jacobson, D. L., Schoen, K., Arif, M., Black, T. C., Snow, W. M. & Werner, S. A. (2004). Phys. Rev. C. 70, 014004.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Ioffe, A., Jacobson, D. L., Arif, M., Vrana, M., Werner, S. A., Fischer, P., Greene, G. L. & Mezei, F. (1998). Phys. Rev. A 58, 1475–1479.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
Kaiser, H., Rauch, H., Badurek, G., Bauspiess, W. & Bonse, U. (1979). Z. Phys. A 291, 231–238.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
Kaiser, H., Rauch, H., Bauspiess, W. & Bonse, U. (1977). Phys. Lett. B 71, 321–323.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Ketter, W., Heil, W., Badurek, G., Baron, M., Jericha, E., Loidl, R. & Rauch, H. (2006). Eur. Phys. J. A 27, 243–256.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
Kitaguchi, M., Funahashi, H., Nakura, T., Hino, M. & Shimizu, H. M. (2003). Phys. Rev. A 67, 033609.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Kitchens, T. A., Oversluizen, T., Passell, L. & Schermer, R. I. (1974). Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 791–794.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
Koester, L. & Nistler, W. (1975). Z. Phys. Teil A 272, 189–196.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
McReynolds, A. W. (1951). Phys. Rev. 84, 969–972.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
Mishima, K., Ino, T., Sakai, K., Shinohara, T., Hirota, K., Ikeda, K., Sato, H., Otake, Y., Ohmori, H., Muto, S., Higashi, N., Morishima, T., Kitaguch, M., Hino, M., Funahashi, H., Shima, T., Suzuki, J., Niita, T., Taketani, K., Seki, Y. & Shimizu, H. M. (2009). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 600, 342–345.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
Rauch, H., Treimer, W. & Bonse, U. (1974). Phys. Lett. A 47, 369–371.
CrossRef
CAS
Web of Science
Google Scholar
Rauch, H., Zeilinger, A., Badurek, G., Wilfing, A., Bauspiess, W. & Bonse, U. (1975). Phys. Lett. A 54, 425–427.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Rorer, D., Ecker, B. & Akyüz, R. (1969). Nucl. Phys. A 133, 410–416.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
Schoen, K., Jacobson, D. L., Arif, M., Huffman, P. R., Black, T. C., Snow, W. M., Lamoreaux, S. K., Kaiser, H. & Werner, S. A. (2003). Phys. Rev. C. 67, 044005.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Seki, Y., Funahashi, H., Kitaguchi, M., Hino, M., Otake, Y., Taketani, K. & Shimizu, H. M. (2010). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 79, 124201.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Shull, C. G. & Shaw, W. M. (1973). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A 28, 657–661.
CrossRef
CAS
Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

journal menu
access



