research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767

Current status of multilayer neutron interferometry with gaseous samples at J-PARC

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Aichi, Japan, bRIKEN Center for Advanced Photonics, Wako 351-0198, Saitama, Japan, cIndiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401, USA, dDepartment of Physics, Rikkyo University, Toshima 171-8501, Tokyo, Japan, eInstitute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science, Kyoto University, Kumatori 590-0494, Osaka, Japan, fHigh Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1106, Japan, gJ-PARC Center, 2-4 Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1165, Japan, hKobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Aichi, Japan, iResearch Center for Nuclear Physics, University of Osaka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan, and jInstitute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by F. Roosen-Runge, Lund University, Sweden (Received 18 December 2025; accepted 19 March 2026; online 14 May 2026)

This article is part of a collection of articles related to the International Conference on Neutron Scattering, ICNS2025.

Several few-body nuclear models, such as the Argonne v18 potential including three-nucleon forces and chiral effective field theories, predict the coherent scattering length (bc) for light nuclei. Reliable measurements of bc therefore provide important tests of these models. We have developed a measurement system for determining bc of gaseous samples using a multilayer-type neutron interferometer at J-PARC, and successfully observed the phase shifts of 3He and 4He gases. From the observed phase shifts, we obtained for 3He bc = 3.99 ± 0.23 (stat.) ± 0.66 (sys.) fm and for 4He bc = 2.95 ± 0.11 (stat.) ± 0.67 (sys.) fm (stat. and sys. denote statistical uncertainty and systematic uncertainty, respectively). To achieve higher precision, we are currently upgrading the experimental setup.

1. Introduction

The coherent scattering length (bc) describes neutron s-wave scattering and is a key parameter for understanding few-body nuclear systems. Few-body nuclei such as 3He and 4He are described by several phenomenological models, including the Argonne v18 (AV18) potential with three-nucleon interactions (3N), the R matrix approach (Hofmann & Hale, 2003View full citation) and chiral effective field theories (Bagnarol et al., 2023View full citation), which predict bc.

Therefore, measurements of the bc of 3He and 4He (denoted hereafter as Mathematical equation and Mathematical equation) can serve as benchmarks for studies of few-body nuclear systems.

Experimentally, bc values have been measured using several methods, including scattering cross-section measurements (Haddock et al., 2019View full citation), reflectometry (Kitchens et al., 1974View full citation), diffraction (Shull & Shaw, 1973View full citation) and, most prominently, neutron interferometry (Ioffe et al., 1998View full citation). For instance, the bc values of H and D, obtained using neutron interferometers (NIs) with relative precisions of 3.0 × 10−4 (Koester & Nistler, 1975View full citation) and 4.5 × 10−4 (Schoen et al., 2003View full citation), respectively, are consistent with the predictions of AV18 and AV18 with 3N. However, relative discrepancies of approximately 2 × 10−2 for Mathematical equation and 7 × 10−3 for Mathematical equation persist among the latest measurements using Si crystal NIs.

We aim to resolve these discrepancies with a relative precision of 10−3 using pulsed neutrons and a multilayer-type NI. While bc for solid samples has already been measured using a multilayer-type NI, this paper reports its first application to gaseous samples with a newly fabricated gas cell. We present the results as a proof of principle for this method and discuss developments towards higher-precision experiments.

2. Experiment

A neutron interferometer splits a neutron wave into two paths and recombines them to produce interference. The potential difference between the two paths appears as a phase shift in the interference fringes. Since the first implementation in 1974 (Rauch et al., 1974View full citation), NIs have found applications across diverse domains of physics (Colella et al., 1975View full citation; Rauch et al., 1975View full citation; Hasegawa et al., 2003View full citation).

The phase shift Δϕ is described by

Mathematical equation

where m is the neutron mass, λ is the neutron wavelength, L is the interaction length with the potential, ΔE is the potential difference between the two paths and h is Planck's constant. The sensitivity of an NI is proportional to λ and L. Consequently, extending the path length of an NI and using a long wavelength enhances its sensitivity. A conventional NI made from an Si single crystal relies on Bragg scattering, which prevents its operation at λ longer than the Si lattice spacing. The interaction length L and the size of the NI are constrained by the dimensions over which high crystallinity can be maintained.

2.1. Multilayer neutron interferometer

We developed an NI using multilayer neutron mirrors. A multilayer neutron mirror consists of periodic layers of two materials (Ni/Ti) with different Fermi pseudo-potentials for neutrons. We can utilize cold neutrons which satisfy the reflection condition. Because the layer spacing is larger than the lattice spacing of an Si single crystal, neutrons with longer λ can be utilized than in a conventional NI. For the application of multilayer mirrors to a Jamin-type NI (shown in Fig. 1[link]), we used a pair of beam-splitting etalons (BSEs) (Kitaguchi et al., 2003View full citation; Seki et al., 2010View full citation). Each BSE is composed of two multilayer mirrors on SiO2 substrates, separated by an air gap of 211 µm.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Experimental setup of the Jamin-type NI employing beam-splitting etalons (BSEs).

The NI with BSEs not only allows the extension of L but also enables the insertion of large samples that would be difficult to accommodate in a conventional NI, expanding the flexibility of the experimental setup. In the present measurement, a gas cell with a total width of 40 mm was inserted between the two paths, providing L = 8 mm. The value of L is potentially scalable up to 1000 mm.

2.2. Experimental setup

We conducted experiments on the low-divergence branch of the J-PARC beamline MLF BL05 (NOP) (Mishima et al., 2009View full citation). The neutron wavelength used by a multilayer-type NI is determined by the time-of-flight (TOF) method, reducing time-varying disturbances in the analysis process. The multilayer-type NI and the sample insertion assembly were placed on a vibration isolation table inside a thermostatic chamber. To ensure the stability and alignment of the mirror substrates, the rotation of the entire NI and the relative angles between the two BSEs were precisely controlled and maintained using high-precision stepping motors. We observed an interferogram using pulsed neutrons (Fujiie et al., 2024View full citation). The bandwidth of λ is from 0.9 to 1.1 nm. The phase determination accuracy was comparable to that of a conventional NI. In our previous work, we had already measured bc for several nuclei with solid samples and confirmed that these values were consistent with previous studies, except for V (Fujiie et al., 2024View full citation).

2.3. Gas cell

For measuring the bc of gaseous samples, we designed a gas cell (shown in Fig. 2[link]) which was machined from pure aluminium alloy (A1050) at RIKEN. In bc measurements using an NI, one path passes through the sample while the other passes through a vacuum, thereby producing the phase shift. For a conventional NI, the centimetre-scale path separation allows the use of a two-chamber gas cell separated by a partition. However, in a multilayer-type NI, the beam separation is only 380 µm, so neutrons pass through the corner radius formed during fabrication, making it difficult to determine L through the gas region accurately.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Cross-section view of the gas cell. The red region contains the gaseous sample, while the green region is evacuated.

To address this problem, recess machining was performed to create surfaces perpendicular to the neutron path. By creating a 1 mm extension in the x-axis direction, neutrons are directed perpendicularly onto the gaseous sample. Neutrons pass through the red region, 2 mm in Path 1 and 10 mm in Path 2; therefore the effective L contributing to the phase shift is 8 mm.

2.4. Experiment procedure and analysis

Measurements were repeated with and without the sample to minimize disturbances, as illustrated in Fig. 1[link], with mea­sure­ments taken every 10 min. We used a position-sensitive detector with time resolution, consisting of a resistance-division photomultiplier tube (RPMT) and a ZnS/6LiF scintillator. The detector was 0.3 m away from the interferometer setup (shown in Fig. 1[link]). The details are described by Hirota et al. (2005View full citation).

The sample gases were filled at 50256 ± 6 Pa at 299.497 ± 0.06 K for 3He and at 100017 ± 10 Pa at 299.196 ± 0.06 K for 4He, measured by a piezoresistive transducer and a platinum resistance thermometer. The gas cell was evacuated by a turbo molecular pump to 3.00 × 10−3 Pa before filling, and the residual vacuum pressures before filling the gases were 1.00 × 10−2 Pa for 3He and 1.17 × 10−2 Pa for 4He. Table 1[link] sum­marizes the assessment of sample contamination. The levels were below the experimental uncertainty and therefore negligible for these measurements.

Table 1
Impurity list for samples

Sample Impurity level
3He <10−3
4He <10−6

Figs. 3[link] and 4[link] show the interference fringes obtained over 10 min under conditions with the gas cell filled with 3He, 4He and evacuated, respectively, and with the gas cell inserted and removed from the beam path. In Figs. 3[link] and 4[link], the vertical axis I(λ) is defined by

Mathematical equation

where IH and IO are the intensities of the O and H beams, respectively, and Mathematical equation and Mathematical equation are those with a Cd block inserted. We fitted the obtained interference fringes using the fitting function

Mathematical equation

where A denotes the contrast of the interferogram. The coefficients PL and PR represent the inverse proportional and proportional terms, respectively, and they are derived by geometric optics (Fujiie et al., 2024View full citation). Specifically, PR accounts for the phase shift contributed by the SiO2 substrate. The third term, PS = Nbct, is the interaction with the sample, where N is the number density of atoms and t is the sample thickness. The TOF region used for the fit was set from 37 to 49 ms, which corresponds to the reflecting momentum transfer range of the multilayer mirror, 0.232 < Q < 0.292 nm−1. Through relative measurements, PS was isolated as the difference between the wavelength-proportional terms with and without the sample. Scattering lengths were calculated from the phase shifts of each sample (shown in Fig. 3[link]) after subtracting the value obtained in the vacuum measurement (shown in Fig. 4[link]).

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Interference fringes for (left) 3He and (right) 4He. Red and blue lines correspond to data with the cell out and in, respectively. Black lines indicate fits using equation (3)[link].
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Interference fringes for the double-path vacuum measurement. Red and blue lines correspond to data with the cell out and in, respectively. Black lines indicate fits using equation (3)[link].

The extracted phase shifts were Mathematical equation = 0.38 ± 0.022 (stat.) rad, Mathematical equation = 0.57 ± 0.022 (stat.) rad and ΔϕVac = 0.19 ± 0.015 (stat.) rad (where stat. means statistical uncertainty). Consequently, the results were Mathematical equation = 3.99 ± 0.23 (stat.) fm and Mathematical equation = 2.95 ± 0.11 (stat.) fm, with measurement times of 6 and 8 h, respectively. The relatively large statistical uncertainties were caused by a decrease in fringe contrast. The decrease in contrast caused by the insertion of the cell is attributed to small-angle scattering of neutrons by the 18 mm-thick (in total) aluminium wall (shown in Fig. 2[link]).

2.5. Uncertainties

The systematic uncertainties are summarized in Table 2[link]. The dominant systematic uncertainty is the phase distribution in the beam cross section, which is described below. In the condition with no cell, the phase of the interferogram in the TOF varied in the vertical position on the detector, indicating that the neutron phase was distributed along the y axis. We suspect that this effect was caused by a misalignment of the BSEs. We divided the data into three regions along the y axis and analysed each region to derive phase shifts, but the results were inconsistent. The systematic uncertainties arise from the weighted average taken for the three data points, expanding the error bar such that χ2/ndf = 1, where χ2 is the chi-squared parameter and ndf the number of degrees of freedom.

Table 2
A summary of systematic uncertainties for bc

  Mathematical equation (fm) Mathematical equation (fm)
Temperature ±0.00079 ±0.00059
Pressure ±0.00063 ±0.00023
Phase distribution ±0.66 ±0.67

3. Results

Figs. 5[link] and 6[link] compare our results with previous work (Kitchens et al., 1974View full citation; Kaiser et al., 1977View full citation; Kaiser et al., 1979View full citation; Alfimenkov et al., 1981View full citation; Huffman et al., 2004View full citation; Ketter et al., 2006View full citation; McReynolds, 1951View full citation; Genin et al., 1963View full citation; Rorer et al., 1969View full citation; Haddock et al., 2019View full citation; Haun et al., 2020View full citation). The methods used were cross section (CS), reflectivity (RE) and neutron interferometer (NI). Our results were Mathematical equation = 3.99 ± 0.23 (stat.) ± 0.66 (sys.) fm and Mathematical equation = 2.95 ± 0.11 (stat.) ± 0.67 (sys.) fm (where sys. means sys­tematic uncertainty). In this first gaseous sample measurement, a significant phase shift was successfully observed, and several issues in the experimental setup for future measurements were identified.

[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Comparison of measured Mathematical equation with previous results.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
Comparison of measured Mathematical equation with previous results.

4. Discussion

The experimental results revealed a vertical phase distribution and temporal instability, leading to reduced visibility and an underestimation of the phase shift. We recently identified that this distribution stems primarily from the roll angle mis­alignment of the BSEs. Because these systematic effects have not yet been fully quantified, the actual uncertainty in these preliminary results is likely to be larger than that reported above. Furthermore, small-angle scattering from the aluminium degraded the contrast. To address these issues, we are upgrading the setup with high-rigidity stages and low-thermal-expansion materials.

5. Future prospects

To overcome the current limitations, we are preparing a new cell using SiO2 crystals to eliminate contrast degradation from small-angle scattering. We will also correct the BSE roll angle misalignment by making adjustments, and improve the stability by introducing more rigid components. Furthermore, introducing supermirrors optimized for the J-PARC MLF BL05 spectrum is expected to increase the neutron flux by a factor of 20. With these upgrades, Mathematical equation and Mathematical equation can be measured with a relative precision of 10−3 in 6 and 20 h, respectively.

6. Summary

To study the few-body system in nuclei, we performed measurements of Mathematical equation and Mathematical equation using a multilayer-type NI at J-PARC. The precision of bc was limited by statistical uncertainties due to the small-angle scattering from aluminium and setup-related systematic uncertainties. By integrating SiO2 cells, a high-rigidity stage and supermirror upgrades, we aim to achieve higher-accuracy measurements.

Acknowledgements

The neutron experiments at the Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility of J-PARC were performed under the user programme (proposal Nos. 2020A0226, 2020B0222, 2021B0109, 2022A0116, 2023B0816 and 2024A0214) and S-type projects of KEK IMSS (proposal No. 2019S03).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

The data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Funding information

This research was approved by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) (grant No. 21H01092). This work was financially supported by JST SPRING (grant No. JPMJSP2125) and by the RIKEN Junior Research Associate programme. Taro Nambu would like to thank the `THERS Make New Standards Program for the Next Generation Researchers'. Anna McElhannon and William M. Snow acknowledge support from the US National Science Foundation (grant No. PHY-2209481) and from the Indiana University Center for Spacetime Sym­metries. Anna McElhannon acknowledges support from the Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need programme and from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

Return to citationAlfimenkov, V. P., Borzakov, S. B., Van Tkhuan, V., Govorov, A. M., Lason, L., Pikel'ner, L. B. & Sharapov, E. A. (1981). Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 33, 467–471.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBagnarol, M., Schäfer, M., Bazak, B. & Barnea, N. (2023). Phys. Lett. B 844, 138078.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationColella, R., Overhauser, A. W. & Werner, S. A. (1975). Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1472–1474.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationFujiie, T., Hino, M., Hosobata, T., Ichikawa, G., Kitaguchi, M., Mishima, K., Seki, Y., Shimizu, H. M. & Yamagata, Y. (2024). Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 023402.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationGenin, R., Beil, H., Signarbieux, C., Carlos, P., Joly, R. & Ribrag, M. (1963). J. Phys. Radium 24, 21–26.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationHaddock, C. C., Hiromoto, M., Hirota, K., Ino, T., Kitaguchi, M., Mishima, K., Oi, N., Shima, T., Shimizu, H. M., Snow, W. M. & Yoshioka, T. (2019). Phys. Rev. C 100, 064002.   Google Scholar
Return to citationHasegawa, Y., Loidl, R., Badurek, G., Baron, M. & Rauch, H. (2003). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 72, 42–45.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationHaun, R., Wietfeldt, F. E., Arif, M., Huber, M. G., Black, T. C., Heacock, B., Pushin, D. A. & Shahi, C. B. (2020). Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 012501.   Google Scholar
Return to citationHirota, K., Shinohara, T., Ikeda, K., Mishima, K., Adachi, T., Morishima, T., Satoh, S., Oku, T., Yamada, S., Sasao, H., Suzuki, J. & Shimizu, H. M. (2005). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 1836.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationHofmann, H. M. & Hale, G. M. (2003). Phys. Rev. C. 68, 021002.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationHuffman, P. R., Jacobson, D. L., Schoen, K., Arif, M., Black, T. C., Snow, W. M. & Werner, S. A. (2004). Phys. Rev. C. 70, 014004.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationIoffe, A., Jacobson, D. L., Arif, M., Vrana, M., Werner, S. A., Fischer, P., Greene, G. L. & Mezei, F. (1998). Phys. Rev. A 58, 1475–1479.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKaiser, H., Rauch, H., Badurek, G., Bauspiess, W. & Bonse, U. (1979). Z. Phys. A 291, 231–238.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKaiser, H., Rauch, H., Bauspiess, W. & Bonse, U. (1977). Phys. Lett. B 71, 321–323.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationKetter, W., Heil, W., Badurek, G., Baron, M., Jericha, E., Loidl, R. & Rauch, H. (2006). Eur. Phys. J. A 27, 243–256.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKitaguchi, M., Funahashi, H., Nakura, T., Hino, M. & Shimizu, H. M. (2003). Phys. Rev. A 67, 033609.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationKitchens, T. A., Oversluizen, T., Passell, L. & Schermer, R. I. (1974). Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 791–794.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKoester, L. & Nistler, W. (1975). Z. Phys. Teil A 272, 189–196.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMcReynolds, A. W. (1951). Phys. Rev. 84, 969–972.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMishima, K., Ino, T., Sakai, K., Shinohara, T., Hirota, K., Ikeda, K., Sato, H., Otake, Y., Ohmori, H., Muto, S., Higashi, N., Morishima, T., Kitaguch, M., Hino, M., Funahashi, H., Shima, T., Suzuki, J., Niita, T., Taketani, K., Seki, Y. & Shimizu, H. M. (2009). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 600, 342–345.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationRauch, H., Treimer, W. & Bonse, U. (1974). Phys. Lett. A 47, 369–371.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationRauch, H., Zeilinger, A., Badurek, G., Wilfing, A., Bauspiess, W. & Bonse, U. (1975). Phys. Lett. A 54, 425–427.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationRorer, D., Ecker, B. & Akyüz, R. (1969). Nucl. Phys. A 133, 410–416.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSchoen, K., Jacobson, D. L., Arif, M., Huffman, P. R., Black, T. C., Snow, W. M., Lamoreaux, S. K., Kaiser, H. & Werner, S. A. (2003). Phys. Rev. C. 67, 044005.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationSeki, Y., Funahashi, H., Kitaguchi, M., Hino, M., Otake, Y., Taketani, K. & Shimizu, H. M. (2010). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 79, 124201.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationShull, C. G. & Shaw, W. M. (1973). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A 28, 657–661.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds