view article

Figure 3
(a) Comparison of the (00L) scan of DyFeO3 at 1.75 K with the (0K1) scan of TbFeO3 at 3.3 K and 2 T magnetic field applied along the c axis from Fig. 2(b) of Artyukhin et al. (2012View full citation). (b), (c) and (d) Temperature dependence of intensities Ip, and (e), (f) and (g) temperature dependence of FWHMs Hp, of (b) and (e) third-, (c) and (f) fifth- and (d) and (g) seventh-order (pth) satellite reflections of DyFeO3 incommensurate ordering (circles), normalized to the corresponding values of the first-order satellite reflection. In panels (b)–(g), uncertainties are given as grey ribbons that extend to one standard deviation in either direction. Analogous values extracted from Fig. 2(b) of Artyukhin et al. (2012View full citation) are displayed as squares for comparison.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds