view article
Figure 15
Results of the strain/stress solutions and their errors after inflating measurement uncertainties to account for hidden biases. The uncertainties are two to three times larger than those of the un-inflated least-squares estimator, yet they are similar to the three-measurement solutions. This implies that the three-measurement uncertainties are too small since the measurement biases could not be evaluated. In addition, the uncertainty appears to scale with the degree of orientation-dependent scatter. This is evident at the top-most location (z = −2.8 mm), where the deviations and residuals exhibited a greater spread in both the six- and 36-measurement analyses.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 59| Part 4| August 2026|
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576726004085
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS