## research papers

## Atomic structure and phason modes of the Sc–Zn icosahedral quasicrystal

**Tsunetomo Yamada,**

^{a}^{*}Hiroyuki Takakura,^{b}Holger Euchner,^{c}Cesar Pay Gómez,^{d}Alexei Bosak,^{e}Pierre Fertey^{f}and Marc de Boissieu^{g,}^{h}^{*}^{a}Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials (IMRAM), Tohoku University, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan, ^{b}Division of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan, ^{c}Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna 1040, Austria, ^{d}Department of Chemistry, Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala 751 21, Sweden, ^{e}ESRF – The European Synchrotron, Grenoble F-38043, France, ^{f}Synchrotron SOLEIL, Gif-sur-Yvette F-91192, France, ^{g}Université Grenoble Alpes, SIMAP, Grenoble F-38000, France, and ^{h}CNRS, SIMAP, Grenoble F-38000, France^{*}Correspondence e-mail: tsunetomo.yamada.b1@tohoku.ac.jp, marc.de-boissieu@simap.grenoble-inp.fr

The detailed atomic structure of the binary icosahedral (i) ScZn_{7.33} has been investigated by means of high-resolution synchrotron single-crystal X-ray diffraction and absolute scale measurements of diffuse scattering. The average atomic structure has been solved using the measured Bragg intensity data based on a six-dimensional model that is isostructural to the i-YbCd_{5.7} one. The structure is described with a quasiperiodic packing of large Tsai-type rhombic triacontahedron clusters and double Friauf polyhedra (DFP), both resulting from a close-packing of a large (Sc) and a small (Zn) atom. The difference in chemical composition between i-ScZn_{7.33} and i-YbCd_{5.7} was found to lie in the icosahedron shell and the DFP where in i-ScZn_{7.33} chemical disorder occurs on the large atom sites, which induces a significant distortion to the structure units. The intensity in displays a substantial amount of diffuse scattering with anisotropic distribution, located around the strong Bragg peaks, that can be fully interpreted as resulting from phason fluctuations, with a ratio of the phason elastic constants *K*_{2}/*K*_{1} = −0.53, *i.e.* close to a threefold instability limit. This induces a relatively large perpendicular (or phason) Debye–Waller factor, which explains the vanishing of `high-*Q*_{perp}' reflections.

Keywords: quasicrystals; superspace crystallography; structure analysis; phasons; X-ray diffuse scattering.

CCDC reference: 1476647

### 1. Introduction

Quasicrystals (QCs) exhibit a diffraction pattern with sharp Bragg reflections, as a signature of long-range order, yet with symmetries that are incompatible with three-dimensional translational symmetry (Shechtman *et al.*, 1984; Levine & Steinhardt, 1984). The structure of quasicrystals is best described in the framework of the formalism, where the is embedded in a higher dimension (see Janot, 1992; Janssen *et al.*, 2007, for an introduction). In the case of icosahedral (i) QCs, the periodic is defined in six-dimensions (six-dimensional) and it is decomposed into two three-dimensional subspaces: the parallel (or physical or external) space, *E*_{par}, and the perpendicular (or complementary or internal) space, *E*_{perp}. The quasiperiodic atomic arrangement in *E*_{par} is obtained by an irrational cut through the six-dimensional periodic decorated with three-dimensional objects, lying in *E*_{perp}, called occupation domains (ODs) or atomic surfaces.

The description of the atomic structure of the binary i-YbCd_{5.7} QC (Tsai *et al.*, 2000; Guo *et al.*, 2000) is now available in detail and with a level of accuracy close to what is achieved for periodic complex metallic alloys (Takakura *et al.*, 2007). This was made possible by the binary character of the sample and a subtle six-dimensional procedure on large data sets obtained by X-ray synchrotron radiation. The knowledge of the detailed atomic structures of the 2/1 cubic approximants (cAPs) to the QCs, in addition to those of the common 1/1 cAPs, whose chemical compositions are close to i-YbCd_{5.7}, also helped to build the complicated ODs for the six-dimensional structure model of i-YbCd_{5.7} (Tsai *et al.*, 2000; Gómez & Lidin, 2001; Takakura *et al.* (2001*a*; Gómez & Lidin, 2003; Takakura *et al.*, 2007).

The i-YbCd_{5.7} structure is described as a close packing of large (Yb) and small (Cd) atoms, arranged in successive shells. Two basic clusters are necessary to describe the structure: a large Tsai-type rhombic triacontahedron (RTH) cluster and a double Friauf polyhedron (DFP). The large RTH cluster is built up from the following successive atomic shells: a central Cd_{4} tetrahedron, a Cd_{20} dodecahedron, a Yb_{12} icosahedron, a Cd_{30} icosidodecahedron and a decorated Cd_{92} RTH (see Fig. 1). All together the RTH cluster contains 158 atoms and has a radius of ∼ 7.8 Å along its twofold direction. The RTH clusters are located at so-called 12-fold vertices of a three-dimensional Ammann–Kramer–Neri (AKN) tiling proposed by Henley (1986) and connected along their twofold axis by sharing a face (*b*-linkage) and along their threefold axis where they overlap and define an oblate rhombohedron (*c*-linkage; see Figs. 1*c* and *d*). The DFP can be viewed as a prolate rhombohedron, one of the two building units of the three-dimensional AKN tilling, having an edge length of 5.7 Å with Cd atoms at the vertices and edge center positions, and two Yb atoms along the longer body diagonal in the same way as in the YbCd_{2} Laves phase (Palenzona, 1971). The DFPs fill interstitial space within the RTH cluster network and have their longer body diagonal oriented parallel to a threefold axis.

The central tetrahedron in the RTH is believed to play a crucial role in the structural stability of this type of iQCs, as it relaxes locally a frustration arising from the icosahedral symmetry. Indeed, studies of ScZn_{6}, isostructural to the YbCd_{6} 1/1 cAP to i-YbCd_{5.7}, showed that the Zn_{4} tetrahedron reorients at room temperature (*T*_{room}) and its motion freezes along the [110] direction of the high-temperature phase below a (*T*_{c}) equal to ∼ 160 K (Ishimasa *et al.*, 2007; Yamada *et al.*, 2010, 2013; Euchner *et al.*, 2012). The low-temperature structural study has shown that the ordering of the Zn_{4} tetrahedron induces a large distortion to the successive shells, which can be understood by the close packing nature of the large (Sc) and small (Zn) atoms (Ishimasa *et al.*, 2007; Yamada *et al.*, 2013). In the 1/1 cAP, the Zn_{4} tetrahedron behaves as a single molecule and reorients constantly above *T*_{c}. The same is true for the QCs, although no is observed, so that at *T*_{room} the tetrahedron reorients dynamically and the iQC structure displays an exceptional dynamical flexibility (Euchner *et al.*, 2012, 2013).

One of the interesting properties of QCs is related to phason modes, long wavelength fluctuations which exist in all aperiodic structures (Janssen *et al.*, 2007; de Boissieu *et al.*, 2007). It is related to the translational degree of freedom of the free energy expressed in *E*_{perp} in the framework of hydrodynamic theory that leads to a long wavelength diffusive like excitation called a phason (Kalugin *et al.*, 1985; Bak, 1985*a*,*b*; Lubensky *et al.*, 1985). This fluctuation gives rise to phason diffuse scattering (PDS), located in the close vicinity of Bragg peaks and known to have a characteristic anisotropic shape (Jarić & Nelson, 1988; Widom, 1991; Ishii, 1992). So far, the PDS has been observed in all iQC phases for which measurements have been carried out (de Boissieu, 2012). However, its microscopic origin is still an open question.

One of the most challenging questions that remains unanswered is the mechanism that leads to the evolution of the long-range aperiodic order. Can a QC be grown with local rules? What are the respective contributions of the entropic and energetic terms? Are phason fluctuations and their associated

playing a crucial role in stabilizing the long-range aperiodic order? These are some of the questions, which are far from being understood, and for which experimental evidence is lacking.Recently, a new iQC phase has been discovered in the Sc–Zn binary system and its chemical composition is given by ScZn_{7.33} (Canfield *et al.*, 2010). The atomic structure of this phase is of great interest because of the following reasons: (1) i-ScZn_{7.33} is one of the few binary iQCs, whose structure is supposed to be isostructural to those of i-YbCd_{5.7} and i-Ca_{15}Cd_{85} (Tsai *et al.*, 2000; Guo *et al.*, 2000), however, its chemical composition significantly deviates from the latter ones (Canfield *et al.*, 2010). (2) It shows a large amount of X-ray diffuse scattering phenomena, elongated along directions parallel to the threefold axes, around strong Bragg peaks (Canfield *et al.*, 2010; Goldman *et al.*, 2011). (3) It is supposed to be the `parent' phase of a number of iQC phases discovered in the ternary Sc–Zn–*M* systems (*M* = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Ag, Au, Pd, Pt) (Kaneko *et al.*, 2001; Kaneko & Ishimasa, 2002; Kashimoto *et al.*, 2003; Maezawa *et al.*, 2004; Lin & Corbett, 2004).

In this paper we present a detailed structural analysis of the binary i-ScZn_{7.33} QC. Whereas a structural analysis using Bragg reflections alone leads to a temporal and spatial average structure, the diffuse scattering yields information on the two-body correlation function. This is why we studied the i-ScZn_{7.33} phase using both Bragg diffraction and diffuse scattering measurements. The structural analysis using Bragg intensities yields a model with a significant amount of chemical disorder on the Sc sites. On the other hand, the large amount of observed diffuse scattering is fully accounted for by the PDS and a ratio of the phason elastic constants (*K*_{2}/*K*_{1}) close to a threefold instability limit. Combining those results we discuss the microscopic origins of the phason fluctuations and the mechanisms stabilizing the i-ScZn_{7.33} QC phase.

This paper is organized as follows. §2 gives the experimental details, and §3 the structural quality analysis by means of high-resolution X-ray scattering measurements. The results of the structure analysis of i-ScZn_{7.33} using synchrotron single-crystal X-ray diffraction data are presented in §4. The absolute scale measurements of the diffuse scattering and its interpretation in terms of the PDS are presented in §5. The results are compared with other iQCs, in particular to i-Sc–Zn–Mg. The last section is devoted to discussion and summary.

### 2. Experimental details

#### 2.1. Sample preparation

Single grained samples of i-ScZn_{7.33} were obtained by a self-flux technique following the work by Canfield *et al.* (2010). The high purity elements of scandium (99.9 wt.%, Rare Metallic Co., Ltd) and zinc (99.9999 wt.%, Kojundo Chemical Laboratory Co., Ltd) with nominal composition Sc_{4}Zn_{96} were placed in an alumina crucible sealed inside a silica tube under argon atmosphere. The elements were melted at 1093 K for 3 h and cooled to 893 K in 3 h and then slowly cooled at a rate of −1 K h^{−1} to 753 K. Finally, at this temperature the crystal grains were separated from the remaining zinc melt using a centrifuge technique. The morphology of the obtained single crystals is a pentagonal dodecahedron as shown in Fig. 2. Then the crystal grains were sealed inside a stainless steel tube under argon atmosphere and annealed at 473 K for 3 weeks, to remove quenched-in structural defects, such as point and topological defects.

#### 2.2. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments

In order to determine the atomic structure of i-ScZn_{7.33}, a single-crystal X-ray diffraction intensity measurement was performed on the CRISTAL beamline at the synchrotron SOLEIL. The incoming X-ray energy was selected by a double Si(111) monochromator and set to 25.55 keV. Two mirrors located after the monochromator focus the X-ray beam with a size equal to 0.12 × 0.45 mm. The single grained crystals of the annealed i-ScZn_{7.33} sample were crushed and a ∼60 µm piece of the single crystal was mounted on a cactus needle. A systematic data collection was carried out at *T*_{room} on a Kappa-type four-circle diffractometer equipped with an Atlas CCD detector (Rigaku Oxford Diffraction). A distance of 80 mm between the sample and the detector was set, and a φ rotation of 360°, with an oscillation width equal to 1.0°, was conducted. In order to collect intensity data with a high that is both strong and weak reflections, three successive measurements with attenuation factors equal to 1, 50 and 1000 were performed. The last one could prevent saturation of the CCD detector for all strong reflections. The data sets were processed using the software package *CrysAlisPro* (Agilent Technologies). The details of intensity data collection are given in the supporting information.

A high-resolution single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiment was performed on the French CRG D2AM beamline located on a bending magnet at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF). The incoming X-ray energy was selected by a double Si(111) monochromator located in between two mirrors, which suppress higher harmonics and focus the beam vertically. The incident energy was set to 9.3 keV, just below the Zn K-edge, to avoid Zn fluorescence. Two single-crystal samples, as-cast crystal and annealed crystal, both having polished faces normal to a fivefold axis with an approximate surface size of 1 × 1 mm^{2} were used. Each sample was mounted on a goniometer head and placed inside a beryllium chamber under vacuum to suppress air scattering. All measurements were performed at *T*_{room} in reflection geometry on a seven-circle diffractometer equipped with a scintillation point detector. The distance from the sample to the detector was equal to 0.6028 m. This experimental configuration enabled a high measurement, covering almost nine orders of magnitude. Systematic *Q*-scans were carried out along several high symmetry axes of icosahedral symmetry. The diffuse scattering intensity was put on an absolute scale, using the following standard normalization

where *I*_{0} ×*A*_{0} is the number of photons per monitor, μ is the *A*_{slits} is the receiving slit area, *R* is the distance between sample and detector, *r*_{e} is the classical electron radius and *mon* is the monitored intensity of the incoming beam (Warren, 1969; Létoublon *et al.*, 2001*a*; Francoual, 2006). The absolute scale measurement is of crucial importance if any comparison with other samples is to be made. Indeed, unlike integrated intensity, the diffuse scattering intensity is, for instance, strongly dependent on the receiving slit distance and apertures. All absolute scale data are presented hereafter in electron units per cubic ångström (e.u. Å^{−3}) and can be converted into electron units per atom using the atomic density equal to 0.064 atom Å^{−3}. In addition, supplemental X-ray diffraction data for the large reciprocal intensity maps were measured on the beamline ID23-1 at ESRF using a Pilatus6M detector (DECTRIS Ltd). The incident energy was set to 16 keV.

### 3. Structural quality: phason strain

Its mosaic spread on one hand, and its correlation length measured by longitudinal scans on the other hand usually give an evaluation standard of the structural quality of a single crystal. Whereas the former can be related to the mosaic block distribution in the crystal, the latter is related to the defects distribution such as dislocations, leading to a Bragg peak broadening. For QCs the same is of course true, since QCs belong to a special class of crystals, but additional defects known as phason strain or phason strain distribution have to be taken into account when analysing the Bragg peak broadening (Lubensky *et al.*, 1986; Horn *et al.*, 1986; Socolar & Wright, 1987; Lubensky, 1988). In that case, the Bragg peak width (or shift) correlates with the perpendicular space component of the six-dimensional scattering vector, *Q*_{perp} = (see supporting information and references therein for a detailed explanation).

In order to evaluate the crystal quality of both as-cast and annealed i-ScZn_{7.33} samples, positions and profiles of Bragg peaks have been investigated using a high-resolution setup on the D2AM beamline at the ESRF. The sample mosaic spread was found to be 0.05°, which was about five times larger than the beam divergence. For the transverse scan we used another high-resolution setup, taking into account the sample mosaic, which gave a resolution expressed by its full width at half maximum (FWHM) equal to 2 × 10^{−3} Å^{−1} (a definition for the momentum transfer is , where θ and λ are the scattering angle and X-ray wavelength, respectively, and are employed throughout this paper) for Bragg peaks having a *Q*_{par} of the order 3 Å^{−1}. For longitudinal scans, we reduced the vertical receiving slits, which were located at 600 mm, from 1 mm to 0.15 mm, leading to a resolution equal to 1 × 10^{−3} Å^{−1}, corresponding to a correlation length equal to 6000 Å.

Hereafter, the length scales in *et al.* (1986). From the single-crystal diffraction data, the was determined to be with an icosahedral constant (*a*_{ico}) equal to 5.021 (3) Å. The conversion factor from r.l.u. to Å^{−1} is given by 2 = 0.8848 (5) Å^{−1}, where *a*_{6D} is the six-dimensional constant equal to 7.101 (4) Å. Note that this definition is in particular important for the perpendicular space units since an arbitrary scale can be introduced. In the present indexing scheme the constants in both *E*_{par} and *E*_{perp} are set to be the same.

Fig. 3 shows a θ– (longitudinal) scan of Bragg reflections on a twofold axis for the annealed i-ScZn_{7.33} sample. From the figure, we can see small but significant deviations of the Bragg peak positions from their ideal ones. Since the observed peak shifts are both positive and negative, systematic experimental errors such as displacement of the sample from the diffractometer axis can be ruled out. On the other hand, when plotted as a function of *Q*_{perp} the deviation Δ*Q*_{par} displays a linear dependence, which can be explained by the presence of a linear phason strain in the samples. In that case the shift Δ*Q*_{par} is obtained as the product between the phason strain matrix *M* and *Q*_{perp}. Because we used a projection of *Q*_{perp} on the given symmetry axis, the peak shifts can be both positive and negative. Similar peak shifts of the Bragg peak were also observed for the as-cast sample.

The `magnitude' of the phason strain can be evaluated based on the linear dependence of the peak shift as a function of *Q*_{perp} from which the slope α is extracted. Along the three- and fivefold axes the values of α are similar in both the as-cast and annealed samples and are equal to −7.8 × 10^{−3} and −3.6 × 10^{−3}, respectively. Along the twofold direction the value of α in the as-cast sample is about four times larger than that of the annealed sample for which α equals 3.8 × 10^{−3}. This indicates that the annealing did reduce the linear phason strain significantly, but could not suppress it.

The data we had at hand were not sufficiently accurate to determine the full phason strain matrix. However, since the largest phason strain amplitude occurs along the twofold axis, it can be postulated that the phason strain might be related to the symmetry breaking from icosahedral to or lower. When the golden mean () in the phason strain matrix is changed to a rational number, a periodic `rational' AP is obtained (Elser & Henley, 1985; Ishii, 1989; Janssen, 1991; Gratias *et al.*, 1995). In that case, as a matter of comparison the α value for a 1/1 and a 2/1 cAP would be equal to −0.23 and 0.09, respectively.

It is also interesting to compare the results with those observed in the i-*R*–Zn–Mg (*R* = Y, Tb, Ho) phases for which a detailed study has been carried out (Létoublon *et al.*, 2000). Some samples did not show any Bragg peak shift, whereas four samples did show a significant peak shift, larger when seen on the fivefold axis and with a α value of the order −0.01, *i.e.* slightly larger than in the present sample.

The present results demonstrate that the diffraction pattern of the i-ScZn_{7.33} departs slightly but distinctly from the perfect icosahedral symmetry, unlike in the case of i-Sc–Zn–Mg for instance (de Boissieu *et al.*, 2005). We cannot say whether the structure is locked on a periodic AP or not, but from the value of the phason strain, the smallest periodic AP compatible with the present findings would have a cubic with a parameter larger than 90 Å.

In the next step, we have investigated the Bragg peak broadening by measuring the longitudinal and transverse Bragg peak width for a selection of about 16 reflections lying in a broad *Q*_{par} and *Q*_{perp} range along the twofold and fivefold axes. Each reflection was first centred and then measured with two different settings in transverse and longitudinal geometries. The FWHM of these reflections measured along the longitudinal and transverse directions were plotted as a function of *Q*_{par} and *Q*_{perp} (see Fig. S4 in the supporting information). Whereas there is no visible trend for the evolution of the FWHM as a function of *Q*_{par}, a clear linear dependence is observed when plotted as a function of *Q*_{perp}. We observe, however, an anisotropic broadening, with a faster increase of the FWHM as a function of *Q*_{perp} when measured in transverse geometry, *e.g.* the slope β of the linear relationship of the FWHM of the fivefold reflections as a function of *Q*_{perp} is equal to 3.8 × 10^{−3} and 6.7 × 10^{−3} for longitudinal and transverse directions, respectively. This is larger than what was found in the i-Al–Pd–Mn for which the value of β is equal to 2 × 10^{−3} and 4 × 10^{−4} for the as-grown and annealed samples, respectively (Létoublon *et al.*, 2001*b*; Gastaldi *et al.*, 2003). In addition, when comparing as-cast and annealed i-ScZn_{7.33} samples, the β value for the longitudinal width for the fivefold reflections is found to be 4.3 × 10^{−3} and 3.8 × 10^{−3}, respectively. This result indicates that the annealing indeed reduces the phason strain distribution in the sample.

The origin of this linear phason strain distribution is still an open question. It is known that dislocations in quasicrystals are accompanied by both a phonon and a phason strain distribution (Lubensky *et al.*, 1986; Socolar & Wright, 1987). It can thus be guessed that the present phason strain distribution is related to the presence of dislocations, but further experiments are required to validate this hypothesis. In the following we will treat the results within the icosahedral This approach is justified by the very weak deviations from the ideal description, deviations that could only be evidenced because of the use of a high-resolution diffraction setup.

### 4. Atomic structure of i-ScZn_{7.33}

#### 4.1. Synchrotron single-crystal X-ray diffraction data

Fig. 4 shows the reciprocal-space sections of twofold, threefold and fivefold planes, reconstructed from the non-attenuated diffraction data for the annealed i-ScZn_{7.33} sample collected on the CRISTAL beamline. A few strong reflections are indicated using the N/M indexing scheme after Cahn *et al.* (1986). More than 290 000 Bragg peaks were observed, leading to 4778 unique reflections in a *Q*-range up to 16 r.l.u. The maximum *Q*_{perp} value necessary for the indexing was less than 3 r.l.u. On the twofold section, a large amount of diffuse scattering is present around strong Bragg reflections such as the 20/32 and 18/29 on the twofold section. As will be shown later, such strong diffuse scattering is due to long-wavelength phason fluctuations in the sample. In addition, we notice small displacements of some weak reflections from their ideal position, which can be explained by the presence of the linear phason strain in the sample as shown in the previous section.

#### 4.2. Phase retrieval

Using the experimental data set, we carried out a structure analysis of the i-ScZn_{7.33}. Firstly, the phase retrieval of the structure factors was carried out by the low-density elimination method (Shiono & Woolfson, 1992; Takakura *et al.*, 2001*b*), which has already been applied successfully to several iQCs (Takakura *et al.*, 2001*b*, 2007). This method was employed with 2921 unique reflections [] utilizing the *lodmac* software (Takakura *et al.*, 2001*b*). In the next step, the six-dimensional electron density was obtained by Fourier synthesis of the structure amplitudes with the retrieved phases, utilizing the *qcmem* software (Yamamoto, 2008). Fig. 5(*a*) shows sections of the six-dimensional electron density distribution cut by planes containing two-, three- and fivefold axes both in *E*_{par} and *E*_{perp}. When compared with that found for the i-YbCd_{5.7} (Takakura *et al.*, 2007), the obtained electron density distribution of i-ScZn_{7.33} is quite similar, thus indicating that i-ScZn_{7.33} is a Tsai-type iQC. Indeed, from the three-dimensional electron density of the i-ScZn_{7.33} normal to a twofold axis (Fig. 5*b*), an atomic arrangement of Tsai-type RTH cluster can be found (Fig. 5*b*).

Although there is a large similarity between the density maps of i-ScZn_{7.33} and i-YbCd_{5.7}, one of the main questions remaining is the explanation for the difference in their chemical compositions; there is in the i-ScZn_{7.33} QC a Sc (large atom) `deficiency' which has to be explained. It has been proposed that Zn atoms occupy the two Yb or Sc sites inside the DFP (Tsai, 2013). The Sc contrast is not sufficient to extract this information from the electron density maps, thus it is necessary to refine the structural parameters against the intensity data in order to answer the question.

#### 4.3. Structure refinement

The structure _{7.33} QC was carried out based on the six-dimensional structure model of i-YbCd_{5.7} (Takakura *et al.*, 2007), by a least-squares method against 4057 unique reflections [], utilizing the *qcdiff* software (Yamamoto, 2008). As in the case of i-YbCd_{5.7}, the ODs are decomposed according to the cluster ODs. This decomposition is however made on a smaller scale. This decomposition of the ODs in the asymmetric units then allows the introduction of a shift in *E*_{par} for each sub-OD, a parameter that is crucial in the process and allows the description of the crystal chemistry of the iQC. Details of the six-dimensional structure model are described in the supporting information.

We started from a model in which the Yb icosahedron site is fully replaced by Sc, while the two Yb sites inside the DFP are substituted by Zn, which result in a composition of ScZn_{7.6045}. The other Cd sites were fully replaced by Zn except for the disordered tetrahedron at the cluster center where 20 sites are occupied by four Zn atoms with an occupancy of 0.2. During the process the Sc occupancy on the icosahedron site was fixed and the Sc/Zn ratio on the two Yb sites inside the DFP were refined together with other parameters such as the shift of ODs in *E*_{par}, atomic displacement parameters (ADPs) in *E*_{par} as well as an overall perpendicular (or phason) Debye–Waller (DW) factor, *B*_{perp}. The last one corresponds, in a first approximation, to fluctuations of the OD along *E*_{perp}.

The *R*) factor *R* = 0.1133 and *wR* = 0.0561 against 202 parameters (refinement 1). We found that one site inside the DFP (labeled in Fig. S2 of the supporting information) is a mixed site with a Sc/Zn ratio of 0.145 (5)/0.86 (5), while the other site ( in Fig. S2) is fully occupied by Zn, thus resulting in the chemical composition of ScZn_{7.38}, which is in agreement with that reported by Canfield *et al.* (2010). However, on the residual six-dimensional a relatively high residual density peak was found at the position where the OD generates the Sc_{12} icosahedron shell ( in Fig. S2) and is equal to . This indicates the presence of the Sc/Zn disorder on this site.

In a *R*-factor with *R* = 0.1090 and *wR* = 0.0529 against 199 parameters (refinement 2). We observed a mixed occupancy on the icosahedron site with a relative occupancy of Sc/Zn = 0.74 (1)/0.26 (1). For the two sites inside the DFP one site ( on Fig. S2) is fully occupied by Sc and the other ( in Fig. S2) is a mixed site of Sc and Zn with a relative occupancy Sc/Zn = 0.48 (6)/0.52 (6). This model results in the chemical composition of ScZn_{7.52}. Consequently, the residual density peak at the position discussed above decreases to . Plots of observed and calculated structure factors and the electron density maps are provided in the supporting information.

From the above refinements a possible Sc/Zn disorder on the icosahedron site results in a lower *R*-factor compared with the ordered model. Taking into account the level of complexity of the QC structure, it seems difficult to justify either of these solutions, and thus further studies in this direction are necessary. However, the results for the residual electron density distribution analysis support the scenario of a Sc/Zn disorder on the icosahedron shells. Below we present the structure description of i-ScZn_{7.33} obtained when a mixed Sc/Zn occupancy is assumed for the icosahedron shell (refinement 2).

Fig. 6(*a*) shows the projection of a slab with the size of 80 ×80 ×40 Å^{3}, normal to a fivefold axis, of the resulting three-dimensional atomic structure of i-ScZn_{7.33}. The atoms are packed with a point density equal to 0.0636 Å^{−3}. In the structure, the shortest interatomic distance, except for the innermost Zn_{4} tetrahedron, is about 2.08 Å, between the edge center site of the RTH shell and the Sc/Zn site inside the DFP ( on Fig. S2). Yet, this distance does not occur frequently. The second one is about 2.27 Å, between the icosidodecahedron site and the edge center site on the RTH shell.

Whereas all the structural information is contained in the six-dimensional model in a very compact way, the resulting three-dimensional structure is best described in terms of the cluster local environment, *i.e.* the number of twofold and threefold cluster–cluster bonds and their configurations. In the 12-fold vertices of the three-dimensional AKN tiling the local environment of a RTH cluster is expressed by a notation (*Z*, *N*_{b}, *N*_{c}) proposed by Henley (1986), where *Z* is the while *N*_{b} and *N*_{c} is the number of *b*- and *c*-linkages in *Z*, respectively. There are 18 local configurations in the i-YbCd_{5.7} model and their frequencies have been evaluated numerically, and the most frequent ones are (12, 7, 5) and (12, 6, 6), occurring with a probability of 24.87% and 24.40%, respectively (Takakura, 2008).

Figs. 6(*b*)–(*c*) show an RTH cluster of the refined structure of i-ScZn_{7.33}, having the local configuration (12, 7, 5), together with the *b*- and *c*-linkages. Similar to what was observed in the i-YbCd_{5.7} case, large distortions are found on the Zn_{20} dodecahedron shells along the *c*-linkages. This distortion arises from the central Zn_{4} tetrahedron: indeed in the latest for i-YbCd_{5.7}, although the central Cd_{4} tetrahedron is modelled by a partially occupied icosahedron, after the the atoms tend to be `grouped' in a way that resemble a tetrahedron (Takakura, unpublished result).

This central Zn_{4} tetrahedron induces a distortion of the Zn_{20} dodecahedron in a similar way as what was observed in the low-temperature phase of the ScZn_{6} 1/1 cAP (Ishimasa *et al.*, 2007; Yamada *et al.*, 2013). As a result the Zn_{20} dodecahedron atoms lying on the *c*-linkages are `pushed' away from the center leading to an enlargement of the triangles of the Zn_{30} icosidodecahedron. This then results in the distortion of the RTH shell. The distortion of the RTH shell is also reflected by the distortion of the neighboring RTH cluster, which is connected along the *c*-linkage, since two adjacent RTH clusters share a part of the atoms that belong to both the Zn_{20} dodecahedron and Zn_{32} icosidodecahedron (see Fig. 6*c*). On the other hand, the distortion of the Sc_{12} icosahedron shell is relatively small and the shell shows almost perfect icosahedral symmetry, with the average Sc—Sc distance and its standard deviation being 5.19 and 0.11 Å. This distortion of the RTH cluster is very similar to that observed in the low-temperature phase of the 1/1 cAP (Ishimasa *et al.*, 2007; Yamada *et al.*, 2013), and is a direct consequence of the structure trying to be as compact as possible around the central Zn_{4} tetrahedron.

The chemical disorder that has been refined in the DFP is also inducing distortion of the Friauf polyhedron, since a large Sc atom is partially replaced by a smaller Zn atom. This is exemplified in Fig. 7, which shows a DFP around the RTH cluster having the local configuration (12, 7, 5) in the i-ScZn_{7.33} (Figs. 7*a*–*b*) and that in the ScZn_{2} Laves phase (Liu *et al.*, 1996, Figs. 7*c*–*d*). In the i-ScZn_{7.33} we find that the chemical disorder occurs for one of the two sites located along the longer body diagonal (site labelled C in Fig. 7*a*): whereas, one site is fully occupied by Sc, the other site (C) is occupied by Sc or Zn. When the two sites inside the DFP are occupied by Sc, as in the case of the Laves phase (Fig. 7*c*), the DFP is not distorted. On the other hand, when the C-site is occupied by Zn, this induces a distortion of the DFP with a shorter body diagonal, because the atomic radius of Zn is smaller than that of Sc. This interpretation is consistent with the determined length of the body diagonal which is equal to 12 Å in the i-ScZn_{7.33} to be compared with 12.9 Å in the Laves phase as shown Figs. 7(*a*)–(*c*).

We have thus achieved a _{6} low-temperature phase, the close packing of the large Sc and small Zn atoms on one hand, and of the central Zn_{4} tetrahedron on the other hand, lead to a significant distortion of the different shells constituting the Tsai-type RTH cluster. This distortion is mainly driven by the threefold *c*-linkages. Moreover, the DFP is also significantly distorted, because of the replacement of Sc by Zn.

### 5. Phason diffuse scattering

A significant diffuse scattering intensity is clearly visible in the diffraction pattern shown in Fig. 4; it is located near the Bragg peaks, and displays a shape elongation along directions parallel to the threefold axis. This anisotropic shape of the diffuse scattering cannot be explained by thermal diffuse scattering (TDS), but can be interpreted by the PDS in the framework of the hydrodynamic theory. Indeed, because of the icosahedral symmetry, the shape of TDS contribution must be the same for all Bragg reflections and has the form of an ellipsoid, elongated along the transverse directions.

Long-wavelength phason modes, which are fluctuations characteristic of the aperiodic state, also lead to diffuse scattering located near Bragg peaks. In the case of the iQC, and by neglecting the phonon–phason coupling term, the shape of the PDS is given by the two phason elastic constants *K*_{1}, and *K*_{2}. The PDS intensity, measured at the distance from a Bragg peak with a scattering vector **Q** having the parallel and perpendicular space components of *Q*_{par} and *Q*_{perp}, can be written as

where the coefficient γ depends on the eigenvector and the eigenvalues of the hydrodynamic matrix C. Here, the C depend on and the two phason elastic constants *K*_{1} and *K*_{2}. The ratio *K*_{2}/*K*_{1}, which varies in the range from −0.6 to 0.75, determines the shape of the PDS (Jarić & Nelson, 1988; Widom, 1991; Ishii, 1992; Rochal, 2001; Francoual, 2006; Francoual *et al.*, 2006). Because the PDS intensity is proportional to the *Q*_{perp} component of the Bragg peak under investigation, the PDS can be distinguished from the TDS.

Since the diffuse scattering measurement has been carried out on an absolute scale, the absolute value of the phason elastic constants can be determined. For this purpose we follow the same procedure as proposed by Francoual (2006) and have measured the diffuse intensity along different directions around different Bragg peaks (having different *Q*_{perp} components). We found that the 1/*q*_{par}^{2} decay is valid in the *q*_{par} range from 0.05 to 0.5 Å^{−1} corresponding to a wavelength between 12 and 125 Å (see Fig. S9 in the supporting information). Measuring the quantity we have deduced the numerical values of the phason elastic constants which are found to be equal to *K*_{1}/*k*_{B}*T* = 1.0×10^{-2} Å^{−3}, *K*_{2}/*K*_{1} = −0.53. Using these values of the phason elastic constants, we have calculated the PDS intensity and have compared it to the experimental one. An excellent agreement between calculation and observation has been obtained as shown in Fig. 8: in particular the anisotropic shape of the PDS is perfectly reproduced around different Bragg peaks. Moreover, the diffuse scattering distribution was found to be similar in the annealed and as-cast samples in terms of shape anisotropy, as was also found for the i-Al–Pd–Mn phase (Létoublon *et al.*, 2001*a*).

The *K*_{2}/*K*_{1} ratio is close to the limit of the first-order threefold instability limit which is predicted for a value of −0.6. Furthermore, it is very similar to what was shown in the i-Al–Pd–Mn QC phase (de Boissieu *et al.*, 1995; Boudard *et al.*, 1996; Létoublon *et al.*, 2001*a*). In this case, it was found that the diffuse scattering increases as the temperature decreases, in agreement with a softening of the phason elastic constants. The PDS was thus interpreted as resulting from pre-transitional fluctuations with a breaking and subsequent lowering of the icosahedral symmetry, driven by a phason softening, which would be quenched in below 700 K for kinetic reasons. We can make the same hypothesis here, although this remains to be demonstrated by a high-temperature study.

#### 5.1. Comparison between iScZn_{7.33} and i-Sc–Zn–Mg QCs

It is interesting to compare the diffuse scattering intensity with that measured for the i-Sc–Zn–Mg phase on an absolute scale. As mentioned above, i-Sc–Zn–Mg is known to have the best quality among iQCs studied so far, *i.e.* low diffuse scattering, no deviation of the Bragg peaks from the icosahedral symmetry (de Boissieu *et al.*, 2005), and is considered to be isostructural to i-ScZn_{7.33}. Fig. 9(*a*) compares the longitudinal scan of Bragg peaks on a twofold axis for the annealed i-ScZn_{7.33} and i-Sc–Zn–Mg QCs. There are two striking features:

(1) There is a much larger number of weak, high-*Q*_{perp}, reflections in the i-Sc–Zn–Mg diffraction pattern compared with the i-ScZn_{7.33} one. Indeed the indexing of the i-Sc–Zn–Mg diffraction pattern requires *Q*_{perp} values up to 7 r.l.u. (de Boissieu *et al.*, 2005) to be compared to only 3 r.l.u. in the case of the i-ScZn_{7.33}.

(2) There is a larger amount of diffuse scattering in i-ScZn_{7.33}. The difference is larger around high-*Q*_{perp} reflections as expected for a PDS contribution (see for instance the 32/48*y* twofold reflection).

These observations can be explained by taking into account the perpendicular DW factor, *B*_{perp}. In fact, an increase in phason fluctuations will induce an increase of the PDS, but also an increase of the *B*_{perp} value. If we approximate the phason fluctuations by a Gaussian fluctuation of the OD with their mean square displacement, the factor diminishes the of a given reflection as

where *F*_{ideal} stands for the of the perfect structure, *B*_{par} is the DW factor in *E*_{par}, and *Q*_{par} and *Q*_{perp}, expressed in Å^{−1}, are the parallel and perpendicular space components of the six-dimensional Bragg peak, respectively.

Since the phason contribution in the i-Sc–Zn–Mg phase is very weak, we can have an estimate of the *B*_{perp} value in the i-ScZn_{7.33} phase by comparing the integrated intensity of the two phases. Although the two data sets were not collected under the same conditions (different incident energy) and one of the phases contains a weak scatterer (Mg), the logarithmic plot of the ratio of the measured structure factors of the two phases as a function of *Q*_{perp}^{2} displays a clear trend, showing that the intensities of the i-ScZn_{7.33} phase are systematically smaller (see Fig. S10 in the supporting information). From this we can estimate that *B*_{perp} is of the order 0.76 Å^{2}. It should be noted that the meaningful value is the ratio of the mean square displacement against the size of the OD because the constant in perpendicular space *E*_{perp} is in arbitrary units. The two ODs at the vertex and body-centred positions have a radius almost equal to that of a rhombic triacontahedron that generates the three-dimensional AKN tiling whose radius is equal to 8.12 Å () along the fivefold direction. is approximately 10% of these ODs radii. In addition, this is approximately 30% of the radius of the OD that generates the cluster centres (radius equal to ). This will create a significant amount of disorder.

This is to be compared to the value obtained from the structure *B*_{perp} was found to be equal to 2.05 (5), which corresponds to values of about 10% of the OD for the three-dimensional AKN tiling, respectively. Here, we note that, in the *qcdiff* software, the effect of the phason DW factor is expressed by exp(-*Q*_{perp}^{2}*B*_{perp}/4), where , and the length scale in the perpendicular is set to 1.

The 10% fluctuation of the ODs is also fully consistent with the vanishing of high-*Q*_{perp} reflections as observed experimentally. For instance, *B*_{perp} diminishes the intensity of a Bragg peak with *Q*_{perp} = 5 r.l.u. by a factor of 10^{−6}. Fig. 9(*b*) shows the simulated diffraction pattern, obtained using the determined phason elastic constant and the phason DW factor, applied onto the experimental data of i-Sc–Zn–Mg from de Boissieu *et al.* (2005). When this simulated diffraction pattern is compared to that measured on i-Sc–Zn–Mg, it is clear that the high-*Q*_{perp} reflections, larger than 4.81 r.l.u. (such as 64/0y and 80/0y), vanish in the diffuse scattering. In addition, the resulting shape of the diffuse tails are very similar to the experimental ones of i-ScZn_{7.33} depicted in Fig. 9(*a*). This comparison thus confirms the validity of the determined phason DW factor, corresponding to fluctuations of the OD equal to 10% of their radius.

### 6. Discussion and summary

The structure of the i-ScZn_{7.33} appears to be isostructural to the i-YbCd_{5.7} one and is described by a quasiperiodic packing of Tsai-type RTH clusters and DFPs, both resulting from the close-packing of a large (Sc) and a small (Zn) atom. The difference in their chemical compositions was found to result in chemical disorder that occurs on the large atom Sc sites, *i.e.* the icosahedron shell and one of the two sites located inside the DFP. The Sc/Zn occupancy on the icosahedron site is found to be equal to 0.76/0.24. Inside the DFP, one of the two sites remains fully occupied by Sc, whereas the other one has a mixed Sc/Zn occupancy equal to 0.48/0.52. Since the radius of Zn is smaller than that of Sc, the replacement of Sc by Zn induces a significant distortion of the DFP. Similar to what was observed in the i-YbCd_{5.7}, we also observe significant distortions of the successive shells in the RTH cluster, mainly along *c*-linkages, that are induced by the central Zn_{4} tetrahedron.

Another important finding is the large amount of observed diffuse scattering, fully accounted for by phason fluctuations, and a ratio of the phason elastic constant *K*_{2}/*K*_{1} equal to −0.53, *i.e.* close to a threefold instability limit. The small value of *K*_{1} and the relatively large value of *K*_{2}, expressed in absolute scale, lead to a large average fluctuation of the ODs, of the order 10% of their overall diameter, which is fully consistent with the perpendicular DW factor obtained from the six-dimensional structure analysis. Both the derived phason elastic constants and perpendicular DW factors allow the quantitative reproduction of the observed diffraction pattern with a relatively small number of high-*Q*_{perp} reflections and a significant amount of diffuse scattering. That the i-ScZn_{7.33} phase is close to a threefold instability limit is also consistent with the weak, but present linear phason strain.

Although, the underlying theory used for the diffuse scattering calculation is a continuum, hydrodynamic one, the absolute values we have derived will impose severe limits on possible atomistic models. In fact, we see three microscopic origins to explain those phason fluctuations:

(*a*) A cluster rearrangement (on the length scale of the cluster–cluster connection); such a cluster rearrangement will in fact require only a few atoms to be displaced.

(*b*) The replacement of Sc by Zn in the DFP. Although this is not proof, it is interesting to note that the DFP are oriented with their body diagonal parallel to a threefold axis.

(*c*) The degree of freedom of the central Zn_{4} tetrahedron inside the RTH cluster. Indeed, in the case of the ScZn_{6} 1/1 cAP but also in the QC, combining a quasi-elastic neutron scattering experiment with atomic scale simulation, it was demonstrated that the Zn_{4} tetrahedron behaves as a single molecule that reorients dynamically. This is accompanied by large distortions of the surrounding outer shells conferring an exceptional dynamical flexibility to the QC (Euchner *et al.*, 2012; Euchner *et al.*, 2013; Yamada *et al.*, 2013).

The large amount of observed diffuse scattering certainly points towards a significant *et al.*, 1996).

On the other hand, it is interesting to look at the possible energy contribution to the stabilization mechanisms for the i-ScZn_{7.33} phase. In this close-packed structure, there are two main parameters to the energetics, *i.e.* valence electron concentration (*e*/*a*) and atomic size factor (δ), which are related to a Hume–Rothery like stabilization, although in this case the stabilization is more to be related to the *sp*–*d* (Ishii & Fujiwara, 2001, 2002). The value of δ is defined by , where *r*_{1} and *r*_{2} are atomic radii of the first (large) and second (small) elements, respectively. For the i-ScZn_{7.33}, the *e*/*a* and δ values are equal to 2.12 and 0.177, respectively. When compared with that for the i-YbCd_{5.7} and isostructural i-Ca_{15}Cd_{85} iQCs, we see that these two parameters for the i-ScZn_{7.33} deviate from that for i-YbCd_{5.7} and i-Ca_{15}Cd_{85}. For i-YbCd_{5.7} and i-Ca_{15}Cd_{85} the values of *e*/*a* are 2.0, while the values of δ are equal to 0.237 and 0.259, respectively. On the other hand, recently discovered i-*R*-Cd (*R* = Y, Gd–Tm; Goldman *et al.*, 2013) have similar values of *e*/*a* and δ to that for i-ScZn_{7.33}. Firstly, the values of *e*/*a* for i-*R*-Cd (*R* = Y, Gd–Tm) are close to 2.12. This is because the chemical compositions of i-*R*-Cd (*R* = Y, Gd–Tm) are very close to that of i-ScZn_{7.33} and the first elements in these phases are trivalent. Secondly, the δ values of i-*R*-Cd (*R* = Y, Gd–Tm) are between 0.149 and 0.106, and close to that of i-ScZn_{7.33}. Therefore, these binary Tsai-type iQC phases can be divided into two groups in terms of *e*/*a*, atomic size factor and valence of the first element; the first group includes i-YbCd_{5.7} and i-Ca_{15}Cd_{85}, and the second one i-ScZn_{7.33} and i-*R*-Cd (*R* = Y, Gd–Tm).

It is known that the *e*/*a* ratio is the dominant factor in the formation of stable iQCs and the iQC phases having the same structure type have a common *e*/*a* ratio (Tsai, 2004). Indeed, a recent structure analysis for i-*R*-Cd (*R* = Gd, Dy and Tm) revealed that a similar chemical disorder also exists, hence they may be grouped in the same structural class (Yamada *et al.*, 2016). The i-ScZn_{7.33} and i-*R*-Cd (*R* = Y, Gd–Tm) would thus form a new type of binary quasicrystalline structures, characterized by the same *e*/*a* ratio, the same long-range quasiperiodic order and chemical disorder together with a similar phason diffuse scattering. One might thus expect for this family a unique energetic and entropic contribution to the total free energy and a similar underlying stabilizing mechanisms.

### 7. Related literature

References cited in the supporting information include: de Boissieu (2008, 2012); de Boissieu *et al.* (1991, 2007); Boudard *et al.* (1992); Cahn *et al.* (1986); Cornier-Quiquandon *et al.* (1991); Elser (1986); Gratias *et al.* (2000); Henley (1986); Horn *et al.* (1986); Ishii (1989, 1992); Janssen (1986; 1991); Janssen *et al.* (2007); Jarić & Nelson (1988); Kramer & Neri (1984); Lubensky (1988); Lubensky *et al.* (1986); Quiquandon & Gratias (2006); Socolar & Wright (1987); Takakura *et al.* (2007); Widom (1991); Yamamoto (1992, 1996, 2008); Yamamoto *et al.* (2003).

### Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1476647

10.1107/S2052252516007041/gq5006sup1.cif

contains datablock ico-Sc-Zn. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock ico-Sc-Zn. DOI: 10.1107/S2052252516007041/gq5006ico-Sc-Znsup2.hkl

Intensity data collection details. DOI: 10.1107/S2052252516007041/gq5006sup3.txt

Supporting figures and tables. DOI: 10.1107/S2052252516007041/gq5006sup4.pdf

Program(s) used to solve structure: lodemac (H. Takakura *et al.*,Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 236-239); program(s) used to refine structure: QUASI07_08 (Akiji Yamamoto,Sci. Tech. Adv. Mat.. 9, (2008) 013001).

Sc_{12}Zn_{88} | α = 90° |

M = 6293.79_{r} | β = 90° |

P1 | γ = 90° |

a = 100.01600 Å | Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.48530 Å |

b = 100.01600 Å | T = 298 K |

c = 100.01600 Å |

CCD diffractometer | ω–scans |

Radiation source: undulator | 4778 independent reflections |

Si(111) double crystal monochromator | 4057 reflections with > 3σ(F) |

R[F^{2} > 2σ(F^{2})] = 0.109 | 199 parameters |

wR(F^{2}) = 0.053 | Primary atom site location: low-density elimination |

4057 reflections | Unit weights |

### Acknowledgements

We thank the SOLEIL and ESRF facilities for the attribution of beam time. We thank J.-F. Bérar and N. Boudet for their help in setting up the experiment on D2AM beamline at ESRF. We thank Sasha Popov for his help in collecting data on the ID23-1 beamline at the ESRF. The work of T. Yamada was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows Number 26-2924. The work of H. Takakura was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Nos. 2156003, 24560002, 15K04659). The work is supported by the ANR 2011-BS04-004-01. The present study was partly carried out within the European C-MAC network. Figs. 5 and 6 were obtained using *VESTA* software (Momma & Izumi, 2011).

### References

Bak, P. (1985*a*). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **54**, 1517–1519. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar

Bak, P. (1985*b*). *Phys. Rev. B*, **32**, 5764–5772. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Boissieu, M. de (2008). *Philos. Mag.* **88**, 2295–2309. Google Scholar

Boissieu, M. de (2012). *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **41**, 6778–6786. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar

Boissieu, M. de, Janot, C., Dubois, J. M., Audier, M. & Dubost, B. (1991). *J. Phys. Condens. Matter*, **3**, 1–25. CrossRef Google Scholar

Boissieu, M. de, Boudard, M., Hennion, B., Bellissent, R., Kycia, S., Goldman, A., Janot, C. & Audier, M. (1995). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **75**, 89–92. CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar

Boissieu, M. de, Currat, R. & Francoual, S. (2007). *Physics of Quasicrystals*, edited by T. Fujiwara & Y. Ishii, pp. 107–169. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar

Boissieu, M. de, Francoual, S., Kaneko, Y. & Ishimasa, T. (2005). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **95**, 105503. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Boudard, M., de Boissieu, M., Janot, C., Heger, G., Beeli, C., Nissen, H., Vincent, H., Ibberson, R., Audier, M. & Dubois, J. M. (1992). *J. Phys. Condens. Matter* **4**, 10149–10168. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Boudard, M., de Boissieu, M., Létoublon, A., Hennion, B., Bellissent, R. & Janot, C. (1996). *Europhys. Lett.* **33**, 199–204. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Cahn, J. W., Shechtman, D. & Gratias, D. (1986). *J. Mater. Res.* **1**, 13–26.. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Canfield, P. C., Caudle, M. L., Ho, C. S., Kreyssig, A., Nandi, S., Kim, M. G., Lin, X., Kracher, A., Dennis, K. W., McCallum, R. W. & Goldman, A. I. (2010). *Phys. Rev. B*, **81**, 020201. CrossRef Google Scholar

Cornier-Quiquandon, M., Quivy, M., Lefebvre, S., Elkaim, E., Heger, G., Katz, A. & Gratias, D. (1991). *Phys. Rev. B*, **44**, 2071. Google Scholar

Elser, V. (1986). *Acta Cryst.* A**42**, 36–43. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar

Elser, V. & Henley, C. L. (1985). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **55**, 2883–2886. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar

Euchner, H., Yamada, T., Rols, S., Ishimasa, T., Kaneko, Y., Ollivier, J., Schober, H., Mihalkovič, M. & de Boissieu, M. (2013). *J. Phys. Condens. Matter*, **25**, 115405. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Euchner, H., Yamada, T., Schober, H., Rols, S., Mihalkovič, M., Tamura, R., Ishimasa, T. & de Boissieu, M. (2012). *J. Phys. Condens. Matter*, **24**, 415403. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Francoual, S. (2006). *Phonons et Phasons dans les quasicristaux de symetrie icosaedrique et dans leurs approximants 1/1 periodiques.* Ph.D. thesis. Université Joseph-Fourier – Grenoble I. Google Scholar

Francoual, S., Livet, F., de Boissieu, M., Yakhou, F., Bley, F., Létoublon, A., Caudron, R., Gastaldi, J. & Currat, R. (2006). *Philos. Mag.* **86**(6–8), 1029–1035. CrossRef Google Scholar

Gastaldi, J., Agliozzo, S., Létoublon, A., Wang, J., Mancini, L., Klein, H., Härtwig, J., Baruchel, J., Fisher, I., Sato, T., Tsai, A. P. & de Boissieu, A. M. (2003). *Philos. Mag.* **83**, 1–29. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Goldman, A. I., Kong, T., Kreyssig, A., Jesche, A., Ramazanoglu, M., Dennis, K. W., Bud'ko, S. L. & Canfield, P. C. (2013). *Nat. Mater.* **12**, 714–718. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Goldman, A., Kreyssig, A., Nandi, S., Kim, M., Caudle, M. & Canfield, P. (2011). *Philos. Mag.* **91**(19–21), 2427–2433. CrossRef Google Scholar

Gómez, C. P. & Lidin, S. (2001). *Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.* **40**, 4037–4039. Google Scholar

Gómez, C. P. & Lidin, S. (2003). *Phys. Rev. B*, **68**, 024203. Google Scholar

Gratias, D., Katz, A. & Quiquandon, M. (1995). *J. Phys. Condens. Matter*, **7**, 9101–9125. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar

Gratias, D., Puyraimond, F., Quiquandon, M. & Katz, A. (2000). *Phys. Rev. B*, **63**, 024202. CrossRef Google Scholar

Guo, J. Q., Abe, E. & Tsai, A. P. (2000). *Phys. Rev. B*, **62**, R14605–R14608. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Henley, C. L. (1986). *Phys. Rev. B*, **34**, 797–816. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar

Horn, P. M., Malzfeldt, W., DiVincenzo, D. P., Toner, J. & Gambino, R. (1986). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **57**, 1444–1447. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Ishii, Y. (1989). *Phys. Rev. B*, **39**, 11862–11871. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar

Ishii, Y. (1992). *Phys. Rev. B*, **45**, 5228–5239. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar

Ishii, Y. & Fujiwara, T. (2001). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **87**, 206408. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Ishii, Y. & Fujiwara, T. (2002). *J. Alloys Compd.* **342**, 343–347. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Ishimasa, T., Kasano, Y., Tachibana, A., Kashimoto, S. & Osaka, K. (2007). *Philos. Mag.* **87**(18–21), 2887–2897. CrossRef Google Scholar

Janot, C. (1992). *Quasicrystals: a primer.* Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

Janssen, T. (1986). *Acta Cryst.* A**42**, 261–271. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar

Janssen, T. (1991). *Europhys. Lett.* **14**, 131–136. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar

Janssen, T., Chapuis, G. & de Boissieu, M. (2007). *Aperiodic Crystals: From Modulated Phases to Quasicrystals.* Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

Jarić, M. V. & Nelson, D. R. (1988). *Phys. Rev. B*, **37**, 4458–4472. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar

Kalugin, Kalugin, P., Kitayev, A. Y. & Levitov, L. (1985). *JETP Lett.* **41**(3), 145–149. Google Scholar

Kaneko, Y., Arichika, Y. & Ishimasa, T. (2001). *Philos. Mag. Lett.* **81**, 777–787. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Kaneko, Y. & Ishimasa, T. (2002). *Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.* **41**(10A), L1112–L1115. CrossRef Google Scholar

Kashimoto, S., Maezawa, R., Kasano, Y., Mitani, T. & Ishimasa, T. (2003). *Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.* **42**(2), L1268–L1271. CrossRef Google Scholar

Kramer, P. & Neri, R. (1984). *Acta Cryst.* A**40**, 580–587. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar

Létoublon, A., de Boissieu, M., Boudard, M., Mancini, L., Gastaldi, J., Hennion, B., Caudron, R. & Bellissent, R. (2001*a*). *Philos. Mag. Lett.* **81**, 273–283. Google Scholar

Létoublon, A., Fisher, I. R., Sato, T. J., de Boissieu, M., Boudard, M., Agliozzo, S., Mancini, L., Gastaldi, J., Canfield, P. C., Goldman, A. I. & Tsai, A. P. (2000). *Mater. Sci. Eng. A*, **294–296**, 127–130. Google Scholar

Létoublon, A., Yakhou, F., Livet, F., Bley, F., de Boissieu, M., Mancini, L., Caudron, R., Vettier, C. & Gastaldi, J. (2001*b*). *Europhys. Lett.* **54**, 753–759. Google Scholar

Levine, D. & Steinhardt, P. J. (1984). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **53**, 2477–2480. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar

Lin, Q. & Corbett, J. D. (2004). *Inorg. Chem.* **43**, 1912–1919. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Liu, X., Rau, F., Breu, J. & Range, K.-J. (1996). *J. Alloys Compounds*, **243**, L5–L7. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Lubensky, T. (1988). *Introduction to Quasicrystals*, edited by M. Jaric, pp. 199–280. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar

Lubensky, T. C., Ramaswamy, S. & Toner, J. (1985). *Phys. Rev. B*, **32**, 7444–7452. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar

Lubensky, T. C., Socolar, J. E. S., Steinhardt, P. J., Bancel, P. A. & Heiney, P. A. (1986). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **57**, 1440–1443. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Maezawa, R., Kashimoto, S. & Ishimasa, T. (2004). *Philos. Mag. Lett.* **84**, 215–223. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Momma, K. & Izumi, F. (2011). *J. Appl. Cryst.* **44**, 1272–1276. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

Palenzona, A. (1971). *J. Less-Common Met.* **25**, 367–372. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

Rochal, S. B. (2001). *Phys. Rev. B*, **64**, 144204. CrossRef Google Scholar

Quiquandon, M. & Gratias, D. (2006). *Phys. Rev. B*, **74**, 214205. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar

Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D. & Cahn, J. W. (1984). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **53**, 1951–1953. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar

Shiono, M. & Woolfson, M. M. (1992). *Acta Cryst.* A**48**, 451–456. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar

Socolar, J. E. S. & Wright, D. C. (1987). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **59**, 221–224. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Takakura, H. (2008). *Philos. Mag.* **88**(13–15), 1905–1912. CrossRef Google Scholar

Takakura, H., Gómez, C. P., Yamamoto, A., de Boissieu, M. & Tsai, A. P. (2007). *Nat. Mater.* **6**, 58–63. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Takakura, H., Guo, J. & Tsai, A. P. (2001*a*). *Philos. Mag. Lett.* **81**(6), 411–418. CrossRef Google Scholar

Takakura, H., Shiono, M., Sato, T. J., Yamamoto, A. & Tsai, A. P. (2001*b*). *Phys. Rev. Lett.* **86**, 236–239. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Tsai, A. P. (2004). *J. Non-Cryst. Solids*, **334–335**, 317–322. CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsai, A. P. (2013). *Chem. Soc. Rev.* **42**, 5352–5365. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tsai, A. P., Guo, J. Q., Abe, E., Takakura, H. & Sato, T. J. (2000). *Nature*, **408**, 537–538. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Warren, B. E. (1969). *X-ray Diffraction.* Courier Corporation. Google Scholar

Widom, M. (1991). *Philos. Mag. Lett.* **64**, 297–305. CrossRef Google Scholar

Yamada, T., Euchner, H., Gómez, C. P., Takakura, H., Tamura, R. & de Boissieu, M. (2013). *J. Phys. Condens. Matter*, **25**, 205405. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Yamada, T., Takakura, H., Kong, T., Das, P., Jayasekara, W. T., Kreyssig, A., Beutier, G., Canfield, P. C., de Boissieu, M. & Goldman, A. I. (2016). Submitted for publication. Google Scholar

Yamada, T., Tamura, R., Muro, Y., Motoya, K., Isobe, M. & Ueda, Y. (2010). *Phys. Rev. B*, **82**, 134121. CrossRef Google Scholar

Yamamoto, A. (1992). *Phys. Rev. B*, **45**, 5217–5227. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar

Yamamoto, A. (1996). *Acta Cryst.* A**52**, 509–560. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar

Yamamoto, A. (2008). *Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.* **9**, 013001. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar

Yamamoto, A., Takakura, H. & Tsai, A. P. (2003). *Phys. Rev. B*, **68**, 94201–94213. CrossRef Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.