Active-site solvent replenishment observed during human carbonic anhydrase II catalysis
aDepartment of Physics, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea, bDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA, and cSchool of Systems Biomedical Science, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence e-mail: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Human carbonic anhydrase II (hCA II) is a zinc metalloenzyme that catalyzes the reversible hydration/dehydration of CO2/HCO3−. Although hCA II has been extensively studied to investigate the proton-transfer process that occurs in the active site, its underlying mechanism is still not fully understood. Here, ultrahigh-resolution crystallographic structures of hCA II cryocooled under CO2 pressures of 7.0 and 2.5 atm are presented. The structures reveal new intermediate solvent states of hCA II that provide crystallographic snapshots during the restoration of the proton-transfer water network in the active site. Specifically, a new intermediate water (WI′) is observed next to the previously observed intermediate water WI, and they are both stabilized by the five water molecules at the entrance to the active site (the entrance conduit). Based on these structures, a water network-restructuring mechanism is proposed, which takes place at the active site after the nucleophilic attack of OH− on CO2. This mechanism explains how the zinc-bound water (WZn) and W1 are replenished, which are directly responsible for the reconnection of the His64-mediated proton-transfer water network. This study provides the first `physical' glimpse of how a water reservoir flows into the hCA II active site during its catalytic activity.
Keywords: carbonic anhydrase II; proton transfer; water dynamics; high-pressure cryocooling; active-site solvent replenishment.
The reversible interconversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) and water to bicarbonate and a proton (H+) occurs at a rate that is limited by the diffusion of substrates in the presence of carbonic anhydrases (CAs) as the catalyst (Davenport, 1984; Christianson & Fierke, 1996; Chegwidden & Carter, 2000; Frost & McKenna, 2013; Supuran & De Simone, 2015). CAs are metalloenzymes that mostly contain zinc, although some are found with iron or cadmium. There are six distinct families of CA (α, β, γ, δ, ζ and the η family, which was recently subdivided from the α family) that are found throughout the animal, plant and bacterial kingdoms. In animals, CAs primarily function to maintain acid–base balance in the blood and other tissues, and to help the transport of CO2 out of tissues. In particular, mammalian CAs belong to the α family and are expressed as many different isozymes (Hewett-Emmett & Tashian, 1996). For instance, 14 forms of human α-CA can be divided into four cytosolic (I, II, III and VII), two mitochondrial (VA and VB), one secreted (VI) and four membrane-bound (IV, IX, XII and XIV). The remaining three isoforms lack catalytic activity and are referred to as carbonic anhydrase-related proteins (CARPs). Among these isozymes, human CA II (hCA II) is expressed in most cell types, with involvement in many physiological processes (Krishnamurthy et al., 2008; Frost & McKenna, 2013; Supuran & De Simone, 2015).
The first crystal structure of hCA II, known at the time as hCA C, was determined by Liljas and coworkers in 1972 and was further refined in 1988 (Liljas et al., 1972; Eriksson et al., 1988). These studies laid the foundation for understanding the mechanism of CA activity. In hCA II, the active-site zinc is located within an ∼15 Å deep cleft and is tetrahedrally coordinated by three histidine residues (His94, His96 and His119) and an OH− ion (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the active-site cavity subdivides into two distinct sides, formed by hydrophilic residues (e.g. Tyr7, Asn62, His64, Asn67, Thr199 and Thr200) and hydrophobic residues (e.g. Val121, Val143, Leu198, Thr199-CH3, Val207 and Trp209). The `hydrophobic' side sequesters and positions the CO2 for nucleophilic attack by OH− (Liang & Lipscomb, 1990).
Mechanistically, the conversion of CO2 to bicarbonate in the hydration direction takes place via the nucleophilic attack of CO2 by the zinc-bound hydroxide (OH−) (1). The subsequently generated bicarbonate is then displaced by a water molecule (WZn; Silverman & Lindskog, 1988) (1):
The next step of catalysis is the transfer of a proton from WZn to the bulk solvent, regenerating the zinc-bound OH− (2). Here, the tetrahedral coordination of WZn to zinc causes polarization of the hydrogen–oxygen bond, making the O atom slightly more positive and thereby weakening the bond (Christianson & Fierke, 1996). The general base (B) for the proton transfer is likely to be mediated by ordered waters and His64 within the enzyme, where the hydrophilic side of the active site forms the hydrogen-bonded water network (W1, W2, W2′, W3a and W3b) that connects WZn to His64. This hydrogen-bonded network is believed to act as a proton wire that reduces the work required to transfer a proton from WZn to the bulk solvent for the regeneration of the zinc-bound OH− (2) (Silverman & McKenna, 2007; Steiner et al., 1975; Cui & Karplus, 2003; Fisher, Tu et al., 2007; Zheng et al., 2008; Fisher, Maupin et al., 2007; Silverman et al., 1979). Neutron studies have been utilized to observe the protonation states and orientation of water molecules in proteins (Langan et al., 2008). Such experiments have determined that the water network in hCA II is pH-dependent, with an unbranched wire between WZn and His64 at physiological pH that is broken at high pH owing to a rearrangement of the hydrogen bonds of W1 (Budayova-Spano et al., 2006; Fisher et al., 2011). The side chain of His64 is oriented in two conformations, termed the `in' (pointing towards the active site) and `out' (pointing away from the active site) positions, that are suggested to facilitate the proton-shuttling process (Tu et al., 1989; Fisher et al., 2005; Nair & Christianson, 1991; Maupin & Voth, 2007; Lindskog, 1997; Avvaru et al., 2010). Neutron structures have revealed that His64 is uncharged when occupying the `in' position, priming the residue for the acceptance of a proton transferred from WZn, regenerating the enzyme during catalysis (Fisher et al., 2010). Moreover, the fact that binding of small molecules (activators) in the vicinity of His64 changes the catalytic rate by altering the proton-transfer step adds to the hypothesis that proton shuttling occurs via His64 (Supuran, 2008; Temperini et al., 2005, 2006a,b; Briganti et al., 1997, 1998).
Previously, the capture of CO2 in the active site of hCA II was achieved by cryocooling hCA II crystals under a 15 atm (1 atm = 101.325 kPa) CO2 pressure (Kim et al., 2005; Domsic et al., 2008). More recently, attempts have been made to track the intermediate changes during gradual CO2 release to the CO2-free state by incubating 15 atm CO2-pressurized hCA II crystals at room temperature (RT) for different time intervals (50 s, 3 min, 10 min, 25 min and 1 h) to decrease the internal CO2 pressure (Kim et al., 2016). The resulting so-called intermediate snapshots revealed that two deep waters (WDW and W′DW) immediately replace the vacated space as CO2 leaves the active site. In addition, WI (intermediate water), which is only observed in fully CO2-bound hCA II (Domsic et al., 2008), abruptly disappears, while W1 appears, as the CO2 is released. Moreover, with CO2 release W2′ (an alternate position of W2) in close proximity to residue His64 was observed to gradually disappear, whereas His64 concurrently rotated from the `out' to the `in' rotameric conformation. Despite the structural changes observed, the rapid changes taking place with the crystal incubation method left some of the key questions unanswered, such as how the proton-transfer water network is restored during hCA II catalytic activity.
In this study, we present ultrahigh-resolution structures of hCA II from crystals cryocooled under CO2 pressures of 7.0 atm (0.9 Å resolution) and 2.5 atm (1.0 Å resolution), which are hereafter referred to as `7.0 atm CO2 hCA II' and `2.5 atm CO2 hCA II', respectively. These two structures were compared with the three previous structures (Kim et al., 2016) of hCA II crystals cryocooled under 15 atm CO2 pressure and then incubated at room temperature for 0 s (1.2 Å resolution structure from PDB entry 5dsi; hereafter referred to as `15 atm CO2 hCA II'), 50 s (1.25 Å resolution structure from PDB entry 5dsj; hereafter referred to as `15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s') and 1 h (1.45 Å resolution structure from PDB entry 5dsn; the `CO2-free state' and hereafter referred to as `15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h'). The structural comparison reveals that 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II and 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II are previously unknown intermediate states between 15 atm CO2 hCA II and 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50 s. Together, these studies provide a view of how hCA II utilizes a water reservoir to fill the void in the active site as CO2 is released.
2. Experimental procedures
2.1. Protein expression and purification
The zinc-containing hCA II was expressed in a recombinant strain of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS transformed with a plasmid encoding the hCA II gene (Forsman et al., 1988). Purification was carried out using affinity chromatography as described previously (Khalifah et al., 1977). Briefly, bacterial cells were enzymatically lysed with hen egg-white lysozyme and the lysate was loaded onto agarose resin coupled with p-(aminomethyl)benzenesulfonamide, which binds to hCA II. The protein on the resin was eluted with 400 mM sodium azide in 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.0. The azide was removed by extensive buffer exchange against 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0.
2.2. Protein crystallization
Crystals of hCA II were obtained using hanging-drop vapour diffusion (McPherson, 1982). A 10 µl drop consisting of equal volumes of protein solution (5 µl) and well solution (5 µl) was equilibrated against 1 ml well solution (1.3 M sodium citrate, 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.8) at room temperature (∼20°C) (Domsic et al., 2008). Crystals grew to approximate dimensions of 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.3 mm in a few days.
2.3. CO2 entrapment using pressure cryocooling
CO2 entrapment was carried out as described in previous reports (Domsic et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2016). The hCA II crystals were first soaked in a cryosolution consisting of the reservoir solution supplemented with 20%(v/v) glycerol. The crystals were then coated with mineral oil to prevent dehydration and loaded into the base of high-pressure tubes. Once in the pressure tubes, the crystals were pressurized with CO2 gas to two different pressures (7.0 and 2.5 atm) at room temperature. After 10 min, the crystals were cryocooled to liquid-nitrogen temperature (77 K) without releasing the CO2 gas. Once the CO2-bound crystals had been fully cryocooled, the crystal-pressurizing CO2 gas was released and the crystal samples were stored in a liquid-nitrogen dewar until X-ray data collection. Note that once cryocooled, the CO2-bound hCA II crystals were handled just like normal protein crystals and were flash-cryocooled at ambient pressure.
2.4. X-ray diffraction and data collection
Diffraction data were collected on CHESS beamline F1 (wavelength of 0.9180 Å, beam size of 100 µm) under a nitrogen cold stream (100 K). Data were collected using the oscillation method in intervals of 1° on an ADSC Quantum 270 CCD detector (Area Detector Systems Corporation) with a crystal-to-detector distance of 100 mm. For the 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II data set (0.9 Å resolution), an initial data set consisting of 180 images was collected with 1 s exposures to cover diffraction resolution up to 1.1 Å. The detector was then offset to cover diffraction resolution up to 0.88 Å, and a second data set consisting of 360 images was collected with 10 s exposures. For the 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II data set (1.0 Å resolution), a single data set consisting of 360 images was collected with 10 s exposure for each image. For each X-ray data set, the estimated absorbed X-ray dose was ∼2 × 107 Gy. No significant diffraction resolution decay was observed up to this X-ray dose. Indexing, integration, merging and scaling were performed using HKL-2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Data-processing statistics are given in Table 1.
2.5. Structure determination and model refinement
The structures of hCA II at CO2 pressures of 7.0 and 2.5 atm were determined using the CCP4 program suite (Winn et al., 2011). Prior to refinement, a random 5% of the data were flagged for Rfree analysis. The previously determined 1.1 Å resolution crystal structure (PDB entry 3d92; Domsic et al., 2008) was used as the initial phasing model. Maximum-likelihood refinement (MLH) was carried out using REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011) and the water molecules were automatically picked up using ARP/wARP (Perrakis et al., 1999) during the MLH cycles. The refined structures were manually checked using the molecular graphics program Coot (Emsley & Cowtan, 2004). Reiterations of MLH refinement were carried out with anisotropic B factors and riding H atoms. The partial occupancies of W1 in 7.0 and 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II were estimated such that the electron density in the Fo − Fc map disappears. The refinement statistics are given in Table 1. We also re-refined the water molecules in the three previously reported structures (PDB entry 5dsi for 15 atm CO2 hCA II, PDB entry 5dsj for 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s and PDB entry 5dsn for CO2 hCA II – 1h; Kim et al., 2016) for accurate comparison of the bound water molecules in the active site and the entrance conduit. The re-refined structures were updated in the PDB with the new PDB codes 5yui (superseding 5dsi), 5yuj (superseding 5dsj) and 5yuk (superseding 5dsn). Details of the structural analysis of the bound water molecules are given in the Supporting Information. All structural figures were rendered with PyMOL (Schrödinger).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. CO2 binding sites: active site (CO2/WZn/WDW/W′DW) and secondary CO2 site near Phe226
Structural examinations show that the five structures are very similar. The all-protein-atom r.m.s.d.s between 15 atm CO2 hCA II and the other four structures (7.0 atm CO2 hCA II, 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II, 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s and 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h) are 0.14, 0.12, 0.10 and 0.13 Å, respectively. Although changes in the zinc-coordinating histidines (His94, His96 and His119) are negligible between the structures, the electron densities for the CO2 binding site differ significantly, as expected (Fig. 2). While 15 and 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II show a clear position for the CO2 (Figs. 2a and 2b), deterioration of electron density for the CO2 site occurs in the 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II structure, represented by sparsely connected lobes (Fig. 2c). When the density is modelled and refined with only CO2, the CO2 occupancy is at most 0.7. This difference suggests that the CO2 site is occupied by both CO2 and two waters (deep waters WDW and W′DW) at a pressure of 2.5 atm. The manifestation of WDW at this pressure is supported by the extended electron-density connection from CO2 to WI (Supplementary Fig. S1). In 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s, the electron density for the CO2 binding site is further shifted towards Zn and WZn, which correlates with the known positions of WDW and W′DW (Fig. 2d). This argues that 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II has a higher internal CO2 pressure than 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s. Finally, in 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h, the electron density of the CO2 binding site splits into two distinct lobes, indicating that the CO2 site is completely replaced by WDW and W′DW (Fig. 2e).
Previously, the binding of a secondary CO2 molecule which is 15–16 Å away from the active-site CO2 molecule was reported in a hydrophobic pocket created by Val223 and Phe226 (Domsic et al., 2008). Comparison of the 15 atm CO2 hCA II and 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h structures in this region indicates that the side chain of Phe226 must rotate to accommodate the secondary CO2 molecule (Supplementary Figs. S2a and S2e). Interestingly, in the lower pressured 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II, the subdued electron density for the secondary CO2 results in dual conformations of the Phe226 side chain (Supplementary Fig. S2b). In the cases of 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II and 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s, the secondary CO2 was not present and the Phe226 side chain sits in the position observed in the CO2-free 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h (Supplementary Figs. S2c, S2d and S2e). Hence, the observation of the secondary CO2 and the dual conformations of the Phe226 side chain in 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II imply that 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II has a higher internal CO2 pressure than 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s.
3.2. His64 and the water network (W1/WI/W2/W2′/W3/W3a/W3b) near the active site
As described above, structural examinations of the CO2 binding sites suggest that both 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II and 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II have a higher internal CO2 pressure than 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50 s. Furthermore, 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II intuitively has a higher internal CO2 pressure than 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II, hence leading to the conclusion that the internal CO2 pressure decreases in the sequence 15 atm CO2 hCA II, 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II, 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II, 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s, 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h. Such an interpretation ascertains that 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II and 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II are intermediate states that fill the gaps between the 15 atm pressurized CO2 hCA II and the earliest time point of CO2 release (15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s) observed in the previous study (Kim et al., 2016). On this foundation, His64 and the water network near the active site were analyzed in order of decreasing internal CO2 pressure (Fig. 3).
Although the side chain of His64 lies predominantly in the `out' position in 15 atm CO2 hCA II (Fig. 3a), the electron density of His64 infers that it occupies dual `out' and `in' positions as the internal CO2 pressure decreases (Figs. 3b, 3c and 3d). However, in the CO2-free 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h, His64 is observed to primarily occupy the `in' position (Fig. 3e). In concert with His64 moving from the `out' to the `in' position, the density for W2′ (an alternate position of W2) is observed to gradually dissipate.
In the previous studies, it has been recognized that when CO2 is fully bound in the 15 atm CO2 hCA II structure, WI but not W1 is observed (as in Figs. 2a and 3a; Kim et al., 2016). However, this WI disappeared in 15 atm CO2 hCA II and W1 was observed to appear instead in the CO2-free 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h (as in Figs. 2e and 3e; Kim et al., 2016). Because the measured distance between WI and W2 is ∼4.8 Å, the hydrogen-bonded water network (via W1, W2 and His64) necessary for the proton-transfer wire was presumed to be broken when CO2 fully binds to the active site. In this study, we observed the dynamic replacement of WI with W1 as the internal CO2 pressure decreases, since dually occupied positions of W1 and WI are seen for 7.0 and 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II (Figs. 3b and 3c). The reduction of electron density for WI is observed in the order 15, 7.0 and 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II, with complete disappearance in 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s and 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h (Fig. 3). In contrast, W1 electron density starts to emerge in the 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II, is more pronounced in 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II, and is fully occupied in 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s and 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h. The close 2.0 Å distance between W1 and WI in 7.0 and 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II suggests that W1 and WI exhibit partial occupancies rather than being two separate, stable waters. The inverse correlation, with a decrease in WI and increase in W1 electron density upon decreasing internal CO2 pressures, suggests that WI moves to the W1 position upon CO2 release.
3.3. New observations of alternate WI (W′I), alternate W3b (W3b′) and entrance-conduit waters (WEC1/WEC2/WEC3/WEC4/WEC5)
This study reveals newly observed features in the water network within and at the entrance to the hCA II active site. Along with the previously reported intermediate water WI, another well ordered intermediate water W′I (in this study) was observed in the structures of 7.0 and 2.5 atm CO2 hCA II (Figs. 2, 3b and 3c). When the previously reported structures were compared, W′I existed in the 15 atm CO2 hCA II and 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 50s structures, but was overlooked because of its faint electron density (Figs. 2, 3a and 3d). Compared with WI, W′I is located farther away from the active site and more towards the entrance that connects the active site of hCA II to bulk solvent. Because the entrance is near the active site where water, substrate and product (CO2/bicarbonate) can interchange/interact with bulk solvent, we will refer to it as the `entrance conduit' (Fig. 1). The conduit consists of the hydrophobic residues Leu198, Val135, Leu204, Pro202 and Phe131 on one side, and the hydrophilic residues His64, Gln92 and Thr200 on the other. It should also be noted that the proton-shuttling His64 is positioned perpendicularly to this entrance conduit (Fig. 1).
A close inspection of the structures further identified five water molecules (named entrance-conduit waters or WECs) that are ordered along the surface of the entrance conduit in the CO2-free 15 atm CO2 hCA II – 1h (sequentially named counterclockwise as WEC1, WEC2, WEC3, WEC4 and WEC5 starting from the one closest to water W3b; Fig. 4). Unlike for WEC3 and WEC4, alternate positions for WEC1 (W′EC1 and W′′EC1), WEC2 (W′EC2) and WEC5 (W′EC5) exist in the different internal CO2 pressure structures. Tight hydrogen-bonding networks stabilize WEC1, WEC2, WEC3, WEC4 and WEC5, which are mediated by residues lining the entrance conduit (Supplementary Fig. S3). For instance, the side-chain amide N atom of Gln92 binds to WEC2, and the main-chain carbonyl O atom of Pro201 and the side-chain hydroxyl O atom of Thr200 bind to WEC5, which are conserved throughout all of the internal CO2 pressure structures. Hydrogen-bonding interactions also exist in all of the structures between the five WEC waters (WEC1–WEC2, WEC2–WEC3, WEC3–WEC4 and WEC4–WEC5).
The intermediate waters WI and W′I are located deep within this conduit near the active site and several WEC waters are involved in transiently stabilizing them and water W1 (Supplementary Fig. S4). Among the WEC waters, WEC2, WEC3 and WEC5 participate in stabilizing WI, W′I and W1 within all of the structures. For example, hydrogen-bonding interactions with W′I are observed for WEC2, WEC3 and WEC5, while hydrogen-bonding interactions with WI and W1 are observed for WEC2.
Although all five WEC waters are present regardless of the different internal CO2 pressures, some perturbations of WEC1 (near to the proton-shuttling His64) and WEC2 (near to WI, W′I and W1) were observed during the internal CO2 pressure decrease, which are manifested by multiple alternate positions (Fig. 5). The dynamic motions of WEC waters imply their direct interplay with the proton-transfer water network in the active site. Specifically, interactions between WEC1 and W3b were observed. Previously, the positions of W3a and W3b were thought to be invariant and singly occupied regardless of CO2 binding, leading to the belief that the main role of W3a and W3b was to stabilize the W2 water molecule that is directly located within the proton-transfer wire. However, in this study an alternate position of W3b [named W3b′, which is different from the two alternative positions (W3b′ and W3b′′) in CO2-bound apo CA II in Kim et al. (2016)] was observed along with an alternate position of WEC1 (named W′EC1 in this study) in 15 and 7.0 atm CO2 hCA II (Figs. 5a and b). In these structures, the distances between W3b, W3b′, WEC1 and W′EC1 are so close (1.3–1.7 Å; Supplementary Fig. S5) that they organize into a continuous tube of electron density (Fig. 5). W3b′ and W′EC1 disappear in lower internal CO2 pressure structures, with WEC1 recovering to the singly occupied position (Figs. 5c, 5d and 5e). These results suggest that the waters in the proton-transfer network (W1/W2/W2′/W3a/W3b/W3b′), the intermediate waters W′I/WI and the water network of the entrance conduit (WEC1/WEC2/WEC3/WEC4/WEC5) all act interdependently with their motions correlated.
3.4. Mechanism of the restoration of the proton-transfer water network
By lowering the CO2 pressure in hCA II crystals, we captured additional intermediate states, including dual occupied positions of W1 and WI, an active site partially occupied with CO2, WDW and W′DW, a new intermediate water W′I and an alternate position of W3b (W3b′). By realizing that WI and W′I are transiently stabilized by several entrance-conduit water molecules and that they rearrange during the restoration of the proton-transfer water network, we propose the sequential events in the formation of the water network that replenishes WZn and the consequential connection of the His64-mediated proton-transfer wire during the catalytic turnover of hCA II. Although these events have been postulated from the observations during CO2 release in this study, these mechanisms may also account for restoration of the water network after bicarbonate release, assuming that both CO2 and bicarbonate molecules do not directly mediate the water-network restoration process.
It is observed that only WI, and not W1, is observed near the active site of hCA II in the fully CO2-bound state (Fig. 6a). Because the distance between WI and W2 is ∼4.8 Å, the lack of W1 suggests that the hydrogen-bonded water network from WZn to His64 (charged and in the `out' position) is disrupted. In fact, when hCA II is fully CO2-bound, the proton transfer should have already happened to result in the deprotonation of WZn to OH−, which is necessary for the nucleophilic CO2 attack (the first step in equation 1). After bicarbonate formation via this nucleophilic attack, the product bicarbonate subsequently leaves the active site and WZn is replenished along with restoration of the active-site water network prior to the proton-transfer process from WZn.
It is likely that WZn replenishment and water-network restoration are directly mediated by the transient waters WI and W′I. After bicarbonate diffuses out of hCA II, WI seems to immediately fill the positions of both W1 and WDW (Fig. 6b). This directional branching movement of WI is predictable since the distance between WI and W1 is 2.0 Å and the distance between WI and WDW is 2.4 Å. This interpretation is further supported by the observation that the electron density of W1 emerges as that of WI disappears (Figs. 3a, 3b, 3c and 3d), as well as by the observation that the electron density of WI is fused to the electron density of WDW (Supplementary Fig. S1). Subsequently, W1 can move to WZn (the distance between W1 and WZn is 2.6 Å), and WDW can shift to either WZn or W′DW (the distances from WDW to WZn and from W′DW are 2.4 and 2.2 Å, respectively). Judging by the distance from WI to WZn (2.6 Å), WI can also directly flow into the WZn position (Fig. 6b).
As WI replenishes multiple water positions (W1/WDW/W′DW/WZn), it is important that the bulk solvent supplies the WI position rapidly (acting as a water reservoir), a process that seems to be facilitated by W′I. W′I is separated from WI by 2.2 Å, is located closer to the bulk solvent and is transiently stabilized by the dynamic motions of water molecules in the entrance conduit, which take place in concert with the changes of solvent in the active site (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. S4). As the W1/WDW/W′DW/WZn positions are filled, the intermediate water WI is destabilized by steric hindrance with W1 (the distance between W1 and WI is only 2.0 Å). In addition, the dynamic motions of water molecules in the entrance conduit decrease as the water network is restored in the active site (Fig. 5), which causes destabilization of W′I. Therefore, the intermediate waters WI and W′I disappear. Finally, the active-site water network is fully restored and proton transfer occurs from WZn to His64 (uncharged and in the `in' position) via W1/W2/W2′ (Fig. 6c).
Structural comparisons between hCA II in complex with CO2 and during its release reveal intermediate snapshots during the water-network rearrangement in the active site as the waters fill the void following CO2 liberation. Based on our observations, insight into the water-network restoration prior to proton transfer is proposed. While previous studies of the catalytic activity of hCA II have mainly focusing on the CO2 binding site (Zn/WZn/WDW) and the proton-transfer water network (W1/W2/W3a/W3b), our results indicate that the intermediate and alternate waters (W′I, WI, W2′ and W3b′) and the entrance-conduit waters (WEC1, WEC2, WEC3, WEC4, WEC5 and their alternative positions) are critically involved in catalysis by hCA II. The substrate CO2 enters via the hydrophobic half of the active site, while the product HCO3−, being a charged molecule, exits by perturbing the ordered waters that fill the hydrophilic half of the active site (Silverman et al., 1979; Koenig et al., 1983). Thus, the ordered waters within the active site and its vicinity are likely to exist in a state of intermittent rearrangement during the forward and reverse reactions of catalysis. Taken collectively, our results provide snapshots of low-energy stages of water rearrangement during catalysis. Future mutation studies to perturb the protein regions that stabilize these waters would provide more evidence of their roles in the reaction. Moreover, our results suggest that the catalytic activity of hCA II can be more thoroughly understood with the `extended' catalytic waters (WDW/W′DW/WZn/W1/WI/W′I/W2/W2′/W3a/W3b/W3b′/WEC1–WEC5). Molecular dynamics simulations on this extended water network may reveal further insights into the bioenergetic mechanisms utilized by hCA II to generate ordered water networks from the surrounding disordered bulk solvent (Riccardi et al., 2006; Roy & Taraphder, 2007).
Supplementary information, figures and table. DOI: https://doi.org//10.1107/S2052252517017626/mf5021sup1.pdf
The authors would like to thank Sol M. Gruner and the staff at CHESS and MacCHESS (Cornell University, New York, USA) for their support and beam time as well as the staff at the 6D beamline at Pohang Light Source II for their support in data analysis.
The following funding is acknowledged: National Research Foundation of Korea (grant No. 2014R1A2A1A11051254 to Chae Un Kim; grant No. 2016R1A5A1013277 to Chae Un Kim; grant No. 2016R1D1A1A09918187 to SangYoun Park); Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (grant No. 1.170005.01 to Chae Un Kim). CHESS is supported by NSF and NIH/NIGMS under NSF award DMR-1332208 and MacCHESS is supported by NIH/NIGMS award GM-103485.
Avvaru, B. S., Kim, C. U., Sippel, K. H., Gruner, S. M., Agbandje-McKenna, M., Silverman, D. N. & McKenna, R. (2010). Biochemistry, 49, 249–251. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Briganti, F., Iaconi, V., Mangani, S., Orioli, P., Scozzafava, A., Vernaglione, G. & Supuran, C. T. (1998). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 275–276, 295–300. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Briganti, F., Mangani, S., Orioli, P., Scozzafava, A., Vernaglione, G. & Supuran, C. T. (1997). Biochemistry, 36, 10384–10392. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Budayova-Spano, M., Fisher, S. Z., Dauvergne, M.-T., Agbandje-McKenna, M., Silverman, D. N., Myles, D. A. A. & McKenna, R. (2006). Acta Cryst. F62, 6–9. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chegwidden, W. R. & Carter, N. D. (2000). The Carbonic Anhydrases: New Horizons, edited by W. R. Chegwidden, N. D. Carter & Y. H. Edwards, pp. 13–28. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag. Google Scholar
Christianson, D. W. & Fierke, C. A. (1996). Acc. Chem. Res. 29, 331–339. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Cui, Q. & Karplus, M. (2003). J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 1071–1078. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Davenport, H. W. (1984). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 429, 4–9. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Domsic, J. F., Avvaru, B. S., Kim, C. U., Gruner, S. M., Agbandje-McKenna, M., Silverman, D. N. & McKenna, R. (2008). J. Biol. Chem. 283, 30766–30771. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2126–2132. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Eriksson, A. E., Jones, T. A. & Liljas, A. (1988). Proteins, 4, 274–282. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Fisher, Z., Hernandez Prada, J. A., Tu, C., Duda, D., Yoshioka, C., An, H., Govindasamy, L., Silverman, D. N. & McKenna, R. (2005). Biochemistry, 44, 1097–1105. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Fisher, S. Z., Kovalevsky, A. Y., Domsic, J. F., Mustyakimov, M., McKenna, R., Silverman, D. N. & Langan, P. A. (2010). Biochemistry, 49, 415–421. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fisher, Z., Kovalevsky, A. Y., Mustyakimov, M., Silverman, D. N., McKenna, R. & Langan, P. (2011). Biochemistry, 50, 9421–9423. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fisher, S. Z., Maupin, C. M., Budayova-Spano, M., Govindasamy, L., Tu, C., Agbandje-McKenna, M., Silverman, D. N., Voth, G. A. & McKenna, R. (2007). Biochemistry, 46, 2930–2937. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Fisher, S. Z., Tu, C., Bhatt, D., Govindasamy, L., Agbandje-McKenna, M., McKenna, R. & Silverman, D. N. (2007). Biochemistry, 46, 3803–3813. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Forsman, C., Behravan, G., Osterman, A. & Jonsson, B.-H. (1988). Acta Chem. Scand. 42b, 314–318. CrossRef Google Scholar
Frost, S. C. & McKenna, R. (2013). Carbonic Anhydrase: Mechanism, Regulation, Links to Disease, and Industrial Applications. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media. Google Scholar
Hewett-Emmett, D. & Tashian, R. E. (1996). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5, 50–77. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Khalifah, R., Strader, D., Bryant, S. & Gibson, S. (1977). Biochemistry, 16, 2241–2247. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kim, C. U., Kapfer, R. & Gruner, S. M. (2005). Acta Cryst. D61, 881–890. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kim, C. U., Song, H., Avvaru, B. S., Gruner, S. M., Park, S. & McKenna, R. (2016). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5257–5262. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koenig, S. H., Brown, R. D., Bertini, I. & Luchinat, C. (1983). Biophys. J. 41, 179–187. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, V. M., Kaufman, G. K., Urbach, A. R., Gitlin, I., Gudiksen, K. L., Weibel, D. B. & Whitesides, G. M. (2008). Chem. Rev. 108, 946–1051. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Langan, P., Fisher, Z., Kovalevsky, A., Mustyakimov, M., Sutcliffe Valone, A., Unkefer, C., Waltman, M. J., Coates, L., Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V., Bennett, B., Dealwis, C. & Schoenborn, B. P. (2008). J. Synchrotron Rad. 15, 215–218. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Liang, J.-Y. & Lipscomb, W. N. (1990). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 3675–3679. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liljas, A., Kannan, K. K., Bergstén, P. C., Waara, I., Fridborg, K., Strandberg, B., Carlbom, U., Järup, L., Lövgren, S. & Petef, M. (1972). Nature New Biol. 235, 131–137. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lindskog, S. (1997). Pharmacol. Ther. 74, 1–20. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Maupin, C. M. & Voth, G. A. (2007). Biochemistry, 46, 2938–2947. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
McPherson, A. (1982). Preparation and Analysis of Protein Crystals. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nair, S. K. & Christianson, D. W. (1991). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 9455–9458. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Perrakis, A., Morris, R. & Lamzin, V. S. (1999). Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 458–463. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Riccardi, D., König, P., Prat-Resina, X., Yu, H., Elstner, M., Frauenheim, T. & Cui, Q. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 16302–16311. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Roy, A. & Taraphder, S. (2007). J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 10563–10576. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Silverman, D. N. & Lindskog, S. (1988). Acc. Chem. Res. 21, 30–36. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Silverman, D. N. & McKenna, R. (2007). Acc. Chem. Res. 40, 669–675. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Silverman, D., Tu, C., Lindskog, S. & Wynns, G. (1979). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 6734–6740. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Steiner, H., Jonsson, B. H. & Lindskog, S. (1975). FEBS J. 59, 253–259. CAS Google Scholar
Supuran, C. T. (2008). Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 168–181. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Supuran, C. T. & De Simone, G. (2015). Carbonic Anhydrases as Biocatalysts: From Theory to Medical and Industrial Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
Temperini, C., Scozzafava, A., Puccetti, L. & Supuran, C. T. (2005). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15, 5136–5141. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Temperini, C., Scozzafava, A., Vullo, D. & Supuran, C. T. (2006a). Chem. Eur. J. 12, 7057–7066. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Temperini, C., Scozzafava, A., Vullo, D. & Supuran, C. T. (2006b). J. Med. Chem. 49, 3019–3027. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Tu, C., Silverman, D. N., Forsman, C., Jonsson, B. H. & Lindskog, S. (1989). Biochemistry, 28, 7913–7918. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zheng, J., Avvaru, B. S., Tu, C., McKenna, R. & Silverman, D. N. (2008). Biochemistry, 47, 12028–12036. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.