editorial
Computational and materials structural science
aDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1 HOAJ, UK, and bSchool of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
*Correspondence e-mail: c.r.a.catlow@ucl.ac.uk
The themes of materials and computation continue to grow and diversify in IUCrJ, but with a continuing emphasis on unravelling the structural science of complex functional materials and on developing further understanding of structure–property relations. The recent articles in the journal highlight both developments in technique and approach, as well as the exploration of new classes of system and of problems.
The last year has seen significant growth in structural nanoscience, with developments in the study of alloy nanoparticles of importance in catalytic science The paper of Liang & Yu (2019), also discussed by Slabon (2019), uses aberration-corrected (AC-STEM), to provide a structural model of intermetallic AuCu nanoparticles, with a chemically ordered AuCu core encapsulated within a few-atoms-thick Au shell. This type of segregation with core–shell structures is increasingly observed in alloy nanoparticles, as in the earlier work of Gibson et al. (2015). Another fascinating area of nanoscience is illustrated by the article of Chiu et al. (2019), which describes the formation of gyroid-structured Au nanonetworks, fabricated through the development of Au nanoparticles. A schematic of the resulting structures is shown in Fig 1.
Alloy structural science continues to be a widely explored theme, with computational methods being used by Han et al. (2019) to predict new Heusler alloys and studies of stress-induced detwinning and phase transformations in ternary alloys by Hou et al. (2019). Ternary alloys are also the subject of an intriguing investigation by Martino et al. (2018) of a new compound, Sr2Pt8 − xAs, which is prepared by high-pressure synthesis and has a high concentration of vacancies which are incommensurately ordered.
Another growing area is the use of data-mining, machine-learning and high-throughput screening techniques within computational materials science. Nguyen et al. (2018) report a new method to measure the similarity between materials, focusing on specific physical properties, while Jin et al. (2019) describe how a large-scale computational screening exercise can be used to predict new topological materials.
The structural science of disordered materials is a perennial theme. Gao et al. (2019) describe a new theoretical approach to defect generation during deformation – a key factor controlling the mechanical properties of materials; while Rudolph et al. (2019) develop new models for the defect structure of the widely studied γ-alumina, showing that the predominant defects are planar antiphase boundary structures. Subtle modes of disorder are identified by Takada et al. (2018) in the (MD) simulation studies of the structures of tridymite, where they show, for example, that the structure of HP-tridymite, determined from diffraction experiments, can be described as a time-averaged structure in a similar manner to β-cristobalite, with `floppy' oxygen modes playing an important role.
MD simulations are also used in a study of van de Streek et al. (2019) of phase transitions of a `jumping crystal', with the simulations predicting the structure of the high-temperature structure, which is then verified by against X-ray powder data.
Chemical crystallography, especially of complex ternary or quaternary oxides remains a continuing theme and is well represented by the study of Delacotte et al. (2018) on hexaferrites – an important class of magnetic oxides with applications in data storage and electronics. The structures revealed for these complex ternary oxides include a new hexaferrite stacking sequence, with the longest lattice parameter of any hexaferrite with a fully determined structure. Organic materials also present challenges in structural science, as shown by the study of Jeannin et al. (2018) on one-dimensional organic conductors showing an interesting phase diagram in which the effects of anion ordering and are decoupled; while Huang et al. (2019) present a systematic theoretical study of the conducting and optical properties of a family of aromatic diimides. This latter work again illustrates the power of computational techniques in probing the properties of complex materials.
In conclusion, the recent articles in the journal show that structural materials science continues to diversify, with computation being firmly integrated in the field. Articles in these areas will continue to be welcomed by IUCrJ.
References
Chiu, P.-T., Chien, Y.-C., Georgopanos, P., Sun, Y.-S., Avgeropoulos, A. & Ho, R.-M. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 259–266. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Delacotte, C., Whitehead, G. F. S., Pitcher, M. J., Robertson, C. M., Sharp, P. M., Dyer, M. S., Alaria, J., Claridge, J. B., Darling, G. R., Allan, D. R., Winter, G. & Rosseinsky, M. J. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 681–698. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Wang, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 96–104. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gibson, E. K., Beale, A. M., Catlow, C. R. A., Chutia, A., Gianolio, D., Gould, A., Kroner, A., Mohammed, K. M. H., Perdjon, M., Rogers, S. M. & Wells, P. P. (2015). Chem. Mater. 27, 3714–3720. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Han, Y., Wu, M., Feng, Y., Cheng, Z., Lin, T., Yang, T., Khenata, R. & Wang, X. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 465–472. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hou, L., Niu, Y., Dai, Y., Ba, L., Fautrelle, Y., Li, Z., Yang, B., Esling, C. & Li, X. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 366–372. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Huang, J.-D., Yu, K., Huang, X., Chen, D., Wen, J., Cheng, S. & Ma, H. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 603–609. Google Scholar
Jeannin, O., Reinheimer, E. W., Foury-Leylekian, P., Pouget, J.-P., Auban-Senzier, P., Trzop, E., Collet, E. & Fourmigué, M. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 361–372. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Jin, L., Zhang, X. M., Dai, X. F., Wang, L. Y., Liu, H. Y. & Liu, G. D. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 688–694. Google Scholar
Liang, C. & Yu, Y. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 447–453. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Martino, E., Arakcheeva, A., Autès, G., Pisoni, A., Bachmann, M. D., Modic, K. A., Helm, T., Yazyev, O. V., Moll, P. J. W., Forró, L. & Katrych, S. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 470–477. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nguyen, D.-N., Pham, T.-L., Nguyen, V.-C., Ho, T.-D., Tran, T., Takahashi, K. & Dam, H.-C. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 830–840. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rudolph, M., Motylenko, M. & Rafaja, D. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 116–127. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Slabon, A. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 344–345. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
van de Streek, J., Alig, E., Parsons, S. & Vella-Zarb, L. (2019). IUCrJ, 6, 136–144. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Takada, A., Glaser, K. J., Bell, R. G. & Catlow, C. R. A. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 325–334. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.