view article
Figure 7
Experimental half-doses versus resolution obtained from several previous crystallographic studies (Bourenkov & Popov, 2010BB3; Liebschner et al., 2015BB22; Sliz et al., 2003BB34; Teng & Moffat, 2000BB37; Warkentin & Thorne, 2010BB42; Coughlan et al., 2015BB50, 2016BB51; Howells et al., 2009BB17; Nave et al., 2016BB52; Owen et al., 2006BB30), analyzed accounting for their dose distribution (solid circles) or used as reported (open circles). Aside from the data of Howells et al. (2009BB17) at resolution beyond 10 Å, the overall trend is in good agreement with α = 2, with a best-fit exponent of 1.86.

IUCrJ
Volume 6| Part 6| November 2019| Pages 1040-1053
ISSN: 2052-2525
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252519008777