research papers
A structural study of TatD from Staphylococcus aureus elucidates a putative DNA-binding mode of a Mg2+-dependent nuclease
aResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea, and bPAL-XFEL, Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, POSTECH, Pohang, Gyeongbuk 37673, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence e-mail: lbj@nmr.snu.ac.kr
TatD has been thoroughly investigated as a DNA-repair enzyme and an apoptotic nuclease, and still-unknown TatD-related DNases are considered to play crucial cellular roles. However, studies of TatD from Gram-positive bacteria have been hindered by an absence of atomic detail and the resulting inability to determine function from structure. In this study, an X-ray Staphylococcus aureus (SaTatD), is reported at a high resolution of 1.85 Å with a detailed atomic description. Although SaTatD has the common TIM-barrel fold shared by most TatD-related homologs, and PDB entry 2gzx shares 100% sequence identity with SAV0491, the of SaTatD revealed a unique binding mode of two phosphates interacting with two Ni2+ ions. Through a functional study, it was verified that SaTatD has Mg2+-dependent nuclease activity as a DNase and an RNase. In addition, structural comparison with TatD homologs and the identification of key residues contributing to the binding mode of Ni2+ ions and phosphates allowed mutational studies to be performed that revealed the catalytic mechanism of SaTatD. Among the key residues composing the active site, the acidic residues Glu92 and Glu202 had a critical impact on catalysis by SaTatD. Furthermore, based on the binding mode of the two phosphates and structural insights, a putative DNA-binding mode of SaTatD was proposed using in silico docking. Overall, these findings may serve as a good basis for understanding the relationship between the structure and function of TatD proteins from Gram-positive bacteria and may provide critical insights into the DNA-binding mode of SaTatD.
of SAV0491, which is the TatD enzyme from the Gram-positive bacteriumKeywords: TatD; Staphylococcus aureus; metal-dependent nuclease; DNA-binding protein; structure determination; protein structure; refinement; X-ray crystallography; enzyme mechanisms.
PDB reference: TatD, 6l25
1. Introduction
The twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway exists in most prokaryotes. The tat operon encodes Tat proteins that play an important role in the transportation of completely folded proteins across the bacterial cytoplasm to the periplasm (Sargent et al., 1998; Hu et al., 2010). The Tat system in most Gram-positive bacteria consists of three components: TatA, TatC and TatD proteins (Chen, Li et al., 2014; Freudl, 2013; Biswas et al., 2009). TatA and TatC are membrane-bound proteins and are essential for the export of folded proteins with twin-arginine signal whereas the TatD protein is located in the cytoplasm with Mg2+-dependent DNase activity and expression of TatD is not essential for protein transportation in the Tat pathway (Chen, Li et al., 2014; Freudl, 2013). However, although not required for the Tat export system, TatD is a crucial element of a Tat-system-linked quality-control system that degrades misfolded or mutated proteins and then inhibits the export of such proteins (Matos et al., 2009). In addition, TatD is involved in DNA cleavage during apoptosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Qiu et al., 2005) and processes damaged DNA during DNA repair (Chen, Li et al., 2014).
TatD is a protein that is widely presented and conserved in various species, both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Wang et al., 2018), and it is also involved in the DNA-repair system, in apoptotic cell death and in cleaving neutrophil extracellular traps (Chang et al., 2016; Chen, Shen et al., 2014; Gannavaram & Debrabant, 2012; Qiu et al., 2005). A variety of genes encoding TatD-like proteins, including a single conserved TatD domain consisting of approximately 250 amino acids, have been reported (Chen, Li et al., 2014). However, while these proteins have been widely investigated in Gram-negative bacteria (Chen, Li et al., 2014; Matos et al., 2009; Chang et al., 2016), represented by Escherichia coli, little has been reported regarding the structural and functional properties of TatD-like proteins in Gram-positive bacteria. SAV0491, a putative deoxyribonuclease from the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus (Mu50 strain), shares sequence identities of 30% and 34% with the TatD proteins from E. coli and Homo sapiens, respectively. Although the (PDB entry 2gzx; Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, unpublished work) of MW0446 from S. aureus (MW2 strain) shares 100% sequence identity with SaTatD, we focused on SAV0491 to thoroughly investigate the structural and functional features of TatD-like DNases from Gram-positive bacteria.
This study aimed to elucidate the Staphylococcus aureus (SaTatD). We described the of SaTatD at the atomic level and identified key information regarding the active site of the enzyme, which coordinates two nickel ions (Ni2+) and two phosphate ions. A metal-dependent nuclease activity test revealed that SaTatD critically employs Mg2+ ions for its catalytic reaction. In addition, based on the structural insight into the active site, we found eight residues, His6, His8, His63, His128, His153, Glu92, Glu202 and Asp204, which contribute to metal binding and DNA hydrolysis, and identified the DNase activities of their alanine mutants in an investigation of catalytically important residues. Furthermore, in silico docking based on two phosphate molecules located in the active site developed further understanding of a putative DNA-binding mode of SaTatD. Taken together, our findings in this study provide considerable insights into the structure of SaTatD from S. aureus and reveal novelties in its active site and enzymatic mechanism.
of SAV0491, a TatD-like DNase from2. Materials and methods
2.1. Gene cloning, protein expression and purification of wild-type SaTatD
The gene encoding SAV0491 from S. aureus was amplified by (PCR) using S. aureus (Mu50 strain, ATCC 700699) genomic DNA (Kuroda et al., 2001) as a template. The PCR products and pET-28a vector (Merck Millipore, Germany) were digested with both NdeI and XhoI (NEB, UK) and ligated. After verifying the DNA sequence, the recombinant protein was overexpressed in E. coli Rosetta 2(DE3)pLysS cells (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) and grown at 37°C in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth and M9 minimal broth to obtain native and selenomethionine (SeMet)-derived proteins, respectively. When the cells reached an OD600 of 0.5, 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to induce protein expression. To obtain SeMet-derived protein, 50 mg l−1 L-SeMet was added to the culture medium 30 min before IPTG induction. The cells were then transferred to a 15°C incubator and grown for an additional 24 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4300g for 10 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl pH 8.0, 10%(v/v) glycerol] and then sonicated at 4°C. The lysate was centrifuged at 18 000g for 60 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was loaded onto a HiTrap Chelating HP column (GE Healthcare) that had been pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer. The column was washed with a 30-fold excess volume of lysis buffer containing 20 mM imidazole. The protein eluted at an imidazole concentration in the range 100–250 mM. The collected fractions were concentrated using an Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Unit with a 10K molecular-weight cutoff (Millipore, USA). The SaTatD protein was further purified by gel filtration on a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 prep-grade column (GE Healthcare) that had been pre-equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl pH 8.0).
2.2. Construction, protein expression and purification of SaTatD mutants
The wild-type plasmid harboring the SAV0491 gene was used in site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) as a template for PCR with an EZchange Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Enzynomics, Republic of Korea) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The mutagenic primers designed for the construction of the H6A, H8A, H63A, H128A, H153A, E92A, E202A and D204A mutants are listed in Supplementary Table S1. All mutant sequences were verified by a commercial sequencing service. The SaTatD mutant proteins were overexpressed, purified and quantitated as described above for the wild type.
2.3. Crystallization and X-ray data collection
Crystallization was performed with manufactured screening kits using the sitting-drop vapor-diffusion method. Native SAV0491 crystals were grown at 20°C by mixing 1.1 µl protein solution (9 mg ml−1 in buffer A) and 0.7 µl reservoir solution (2.4 M sodium malonate pH 7.0). SeMet-derived crystals were grown under the same conditions as native crystals by mixing equal volumes (1.0 µl) of SeMet-derived protein solution (9 mg ml−1 in buffer A) and reservoir solution. Before data collection, 20%(v/v) glycerol was added to each crystallization solution and the mixture was used to protect the crystals during flash-cooling by liquid nitrogen. Single-wavelength X-ray diffraction data for SAV0491 were collected at λ = 0.97930 using an ADSC Q315r CCD detector on beamline PAL-5C (SBII) at the Pohang Light Source, Republic of Korea. All data sets were processed and scaled with the HKL-2000 software package (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997).
2.4. and analysis
The SaTatD was determined by single-wavelength (SAD) with phenix.autosol in the Phenix software suite (Liebschner et al., 2019). The initial structure was built using phenix.autobuild and further refined using phenix.refine and REFMAC (Murshudov et al., 2011). The models were manually constructed and ligands were added using Coot (Emsley et al., 2010). 5% of the data were randomly set aside as test data for the calculation of Rfree (Brünger, 1992). The structural deviations were calculated using the secondary-structure matching (SSM) superpose option in Coot. The solvent-accessible surface areas were calculated using PISA (Krissinel & Henrick, 2007) and the protein–ligand interactions were calculated using LigPlot (Wallace et al., 1995).
of2.5. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
Inductively coupled plasma SaTatD. A high concentration of the purified SaTatD protein (14 mg ml−1) and an abundance of SaTatD crystals dissolved in water were prepared and analyzed for the presence of Mg2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+. Before measurement, the samples were denatured in nitric acid using a microwave at 1200–1800 W. ICP-MS (7900 ICP-MS, Agilent, USA) and argon plasma (6000–8000 K) were used for detection. The radio-frequency power and matching were 1550 W and 1.72 V, respectively. All data are shown using the average of three independent experiments.
(ICP-MS) was conducted to identify which metal ions were present in the of2.6. Analytical gel filtration
The purified SaTatD proteins (at a concentration of 0.5 or 20.0 mg ml−1) were subjected to analytical gel-filtration on a Superdex 200 (10/300 GL) column that had been pre-equilibrated with buffer A at a constant flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1. A standard curve was obtained using gel-filtration standards (Bio-Rad, catalog No. 1511901) including thyroglobulin (650 kDa), γ-globulin (158 kDa), ovalbumin (44 kDa) and myoglobin (17 kDa). The experimental molecular weights of TatD were calculated using Microsoft Excel.
2.7. In vitro deoxyribonuclease (DNase) assay
SaTatD protein was prepared and incubated with 4 mM EDTA for an hour to remove nonspecifically bound metals and was then desalted using a HiPrep 26/10 Desalting column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with buffer A. Genomic DNA of SaTatD (771 bp) was amplified by PCR using a plasmid harboring the SAV0491 gene as a template and was purified using a PCR purification kit (Favorgen). A DNase assay was performed in the presence of 2 mM bivalent magnesium (MgCl2), manganese (MnCl2) and calcium (CaCl2) and 0.2 mM zinc ions (ZnCl2) with 200 nM genomic DNA of SaTatD as a substrate. Reactions were initiated by the addition of 10 µM protein and were performed for 1 h at 37°C. A protein or metal concentration-dependent DNase assay was performed in the presence of 2 mM Mg2+ with 0–50 µM SaTatD protein or in the presence of 4 µM SaTatD protein with 0.1–50 mM Mg2+ using 100 nM SaTatD genomic DNA. For the identification of metals in the SaTatD structure, SaTatD protein prepared for crystallization was used in the DNase assay with the same procedure as described above for 24 h at 37°C. A DNase assay of SaTatD mutants was carried out with each mutant protein at 4 µM, 2 mM Mg2+ and 200 nM SaTatD genomic DNA as described above. All reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel in 0.5× Tris–borate–EDTA (TBE) buffer. Gel images were visualized using a WSE-5200 Printgraph 2M (ATTO).
2.8. In vitro ribonuclease (RNase) assay
RNase activity was measured by a fluorescence-quenching assay using an RNase Alert kit (IDT). In this assay system, a fluorophore is covalently linked to one end of a strand of RNA substrate and quenched by a quencher group at the other end. When ribonuclease is added to the RNA substrate containing a fluorophore–quencher pair, digestion of the RNA results in the separation of fluorophore and quencher and fluorescent emission (Em) at 520 nm upon excitation (Ex) at 490 nm by a fluorometer. The assay was performed with 0.2 nmol ml−1 RNase substrate, 1× reaction buffer and 4 mM EDTA or 2 mM MgCl2, MnCl2, CaCl2 or 0.2 mM ZnCl2 in 383-well black and clear bottom plates. After 10 µM SaTatD protein was added to each well other than the control-group wells, fluorescence values were measured every minute for 1 h using a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices) at 37°C.
2.9. In silico SaTatD–DNA docking
To further understand the DNA-binding mode of SaTatD, an in silico molecular-docking study was performed using the high ambiguity driven protein–protein docking (HADDOCK) algorithm (Dominguez et al., 2003). The coordinates for the SaTatD protein were taken from the determined but with the ligands removed, and the coordinates for A-DNA molecules spanning 3 (5′-GCT-3′) or 18 base pairs (5′-GCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCT-3′) were modeled using 3D-DART (van Dijk & Bonvin, 2009). The residues His8, His63, Glu92, His128, Ser154 and Asp204, which were involved in the binding of phosphates and G1–T3 of the DNA, were defined as `active residues' and were required to have an interface contact of ambiguous distance. Passive residues were defined automatically as residues around active residues.
2.10. Data availability
Coordinates and structural factors have been deposited in the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the accession code 6l25 for SaTatD, the TatD-like DNase from S. aureus.
3. Results
3.1. of SaTatD
In this study, we determined the X-ray SaTatD, including the full-length amino-acid sequence (1–257), using SAD [Fig. 1(a)]. The SaTatD structure was refined to Rwork and Rfree values of 21.1% and 23.6%, respectively, at 1.85 Å resolution. The structure of SaTatD consists of two monomers containing 509 amino-acid residues, four nickel ions (Ni2+), four phosphate ions (PO43−) and 171 water molecules in the [Fig. 1(a) and Table 1]. A monomer of SaTatD comprises nine α-helices and eight β-strands as follows: β1 (residues 2–7), α1 (residues 18–28), β2 (residues 30–37), α2 (residues 40–52), β3 (residues 56–60), α3 (residues 72–82), β4 (residues 87–96), α4 (residues 104–121), β5 (residues 125–130), α5 (residues 133–142), β6 (residues 150–152), α6 (residues 159–167), β7 (residues 172–175), α7 (residues 185–193), β8 (residues 199–201), α8 (residues 220–234) and α9 (residues 238–252) [Fig. 1(b)]. In this model, most of the residues of SaTatD were clearly observed, but several regions were also disordered: (i) the N-terminal residues including the hexahistidine tag (6×His), linker (Ser-Ser-Gly) and thrombin cleavage site (Leu-Val-Pro-Arg-Gly-Ser) in both chains A and B of SaTatD and (ii) the C-terminal residues (Asn256–Ser257 in chain A and Leu255–Ser257 in chain B of SaTatD). Two monomers of SaTatD in the were observed with a root-mean-square (r.m.s.) deviation of 0.19 Å for 254 equivalent Cα-atom pairs, indicating that the structures of the two monomers are highly similar to each other.
of
‡Rmerge = , where I(hkl) is the intensity of reflection hkl, is the sum over all reflections and is the sum over i measurements of reflection hkl. §R = , where Rfree is calculated for a randomly chosen 5% of reflections which were not used for structure and Rwork is calculated for the remaining reflections. |
The overall structure of SaTatD showed a TIM-barrel fold (Brändén, 1991; Nagano et al., 2002), which is one of the most common folds in metabolizing enzymes, with eight β/α pairs folded into a barrel-shaped structure including an additional α-helix [Fig. 1(b)]. In this fold, an inner eight-stranded parallel β-sheet was surrounded by nine outer α-helices, and the active site is located in the center of the barrel structure [Fig. 1(b)]. The overall B factors were higher for the A chain (28 Å2) than for the B chain (23 Å2) in the structure of SaTatD, and the highest B factors (52 Å2) were observed in the loop composed of residues 156–160 in the A chain, suggesting flexibility in this region (Fig. 1c). The dimeric interfaces in SaTatD were composed of the pairs Loop2 (Loop′2) between β7 and α7 (β′7 and α′7), Loop3 (Loop′3) between β8 and α8 (β′8 and α′8), and Loop′1 (Loop1) between β′4 and α′4 (β4 and α4) [Fig. 2(a)]. In this interface area, His′98, Trp′99, Asp′100, Ser′102 and Ala′104 in Loop′1 formed hydrogen bonds to Lys182 and Asn183 in Loop2 and to His211 and Arg214 in Loop3. The interactions on the opposite side of the homodimer interfaces were nearly identical. The hydrophobic interactions contributing to dimeric interfaces are represented in Fig. 2(b) together with the hydrophilic interactions. The buried surface area between monomers was calculated to be 580 Å2, and the complex-formation significance score (CSS) was determined to be 0.000 using the PISA server (Krissinel & Henrick, 2007), indicating that the interface area has little relevance to the formation of the dimeric structure. To identify the assembly of SaTatD in solution, we performed using a gel-filtration standard. The result showed that low and high concentrations of SaTatD protein formed monomeric and dimeric structures, respectively, in solution (Supplementary Fig. S1). This suggests that a high concentration of the protein in crystallization resulted in an artificial dimeric form of our and SaTatD is present as a monomeric form in the cellular environment.
In this structure, unusual cis-peptide bonds were also observed at Gly91–Glu92, Ala205–Pro206 and His211–Pro212. They were located in the active site (Gly91–Glu92 and Ala205–Pro206) and dimeric interface (His211–Pro212), with clear electron-density maps [Fig. 2(c)]. Since cis-peptide bonds are mostly found to occur at sites critical to biological function (Williams et al., 2018), these three cis-peptide bonds are expected to play a critical role in the catalytic mechanism of SaTatD.
3.2. Structural comparisons of SaTatD with its homologs
A structural similarity search using the DALI server (Holm & Rosenström, 2010) revealed homologs from the PDB that are similar to the monomer structure of SaTatD. The top five similar structures that were identified are the following TatD-related deoxyribonucleases: (i) a TatD-like deoxyribonuclease from S. aureus (strain MW2) (PDB entry 2gzx; Z-scores of 47.1–47.2, r.m.s. deviations of 0.3–0.4 Å, sequence identity of 100% for 253 equivalent Cα pairs; Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, unpublished work), (ii) a TatD-like deoxyribonuclease from Thermotoga maritima (PDB entry 1j6o; Z-score of 39.8, r.m.s. deviation of 1.3 Å, sequence identity of 39% for 254 equivalent Cα pairs; Joint Center for Structural Genomics, unpublished work), (iii) a TatD–DNA complex from E. coli (PDB code 4pe8; Z-scores of 38.5–38.6, r.m.s. deviation of 1.3 Å, sequence identity of 30% for 251 equivalent Cα pairs; Chen, Li et al., 2014), (iv) YcfH from E. coli (PDB entry 1yix; Z-scores of 37.9–38.0, r.m.s. deviations of 1.5 Å, sequence identity of 38% for 251 equivalent Cα pairs; New York SGX Research Center for Structural Genomics, unpublished work) and (v) YjjV from E. coli (PDB entry 1zzm; Z-score of 38.0, r.m.s. deviation of 1.6 Å, sequence identity of 29% for 253 equivalent Cα pairs; New York SGX Research Center for Structural Genomics, unpublished work) [Fig. 3(a)].
All of the crystal structures of the homologs from various species described above have been deposited in the PDB without associated publications except for E. coli TatD (PDB entry 4pe8; Chen, Li et al., 2014). All of these TatD homologs share a similar TIM-barrel fold, and several of them coordinate metal ions [Fig. 3(a)]. The structure of a TatD-like DNase from strain MW2 of S. aureus (PDB entry 2gzx) shares 100% sequence identity with our structure from strain Mu50 of S. aureus. However, our structural data were collected and exclusively determined using SAD at a resolution of 1.85 Å, which was higher than the 2.2 Å resolution of PDB entry 2gzx, and the status was also much better than that of PDB entry 2gzx. Moreover, we confirmed that the active site in our structure clearly coordinated two Ni2+ ions with two phosphates, while PDB entry 2gzx showed the coordination of only two Ni2+ ions [Fig. 3(a)]. A multiple sequence alignment of homologs was performed using ClustalW (Chenna et al., 2003) and ESPript (Gouet et al., 1999) and is shown in Fig. 3(b). The alignments showed conserved residues in all homologs: we determined that His6, His8, His63, Glu92, His128, His153 and Asp204 may contribute to the binding of metal ions, and that Glu92, Glu202 and Asp204 may play a crucial role in catalytic reactions.
3.3. Active site of SaTatD
Although TatD-related homologs have a highly similar fold, their active sites either bind diverse metal ions or contain no metal ions [Fig. 3(a)]. In this study, the clear electron density of the SaTatD structure at 1.85 Å resolution provided a unique opportunity to understand the metal-binding site of TatD. An electrostatic view of SaTatD showed an acidic pocket in the center of eight-stranded parallel β-sheets with basic and acidic surface areas on both sides of the pocket [Fig. 4(a)]. The acidic pocket is the metal-binding site, and the basic and acidic surface areas contribute to the dimeric interface. Regarding the metal-binding site, apparent electron density for two metal ions was observed. ICP-MS analysis using purified SaTatD or SaTatD crystals determined that these two metal-binding sites were occupied by nickel(II) (Ni2+) ions (Supplementary Table S2). Consequently, four Ni2+ ions were observed in the with two of the Ni2+ ions coordinated to each monomer [Fig. 4(b)]. The two Ni2+ ions in a monomer were located at the acidic pocket and towards the solvent channel. Two phosphates and the following residues coordinated the metal ions: His6, His8, His63, Glu92, His128, His153 and Asp204 [Fig. 4(b)]. Ni(1) interacted with the side chains of His6, His8, Glu92 and Asp204 and with PO4(1). Ni(2) was coordinated by the side chains of Glu92, His128 and His153 and by PO4(1) and PO4(2). The distance between the two Ni2+ ions was 3.5 Å, and the O atoms of Glu92 and PO4(1) formed bridges between the two Ni2+ ions [Fig. 4(b)]. Polar interactions were also observed between the two phosphates and the surface residues of SaTatD [Fig. 4(c)]. PO4(1) and PO4(2) formed polar interactions with His8, His63, Glu92 and His128, and with His128, Ser154 and Asp204, respectively, where the distance between the two phosphates was 5.4 Å [Fig. 4(c)]. We identified that the two phosphates [PO4(1) and PO4(2)] in the active site resemble the scissile phosphates (3′- and 5′-phosphates) of DNA in the structure of E. coli TatD (PDB entry 4pe8) [Fig. 4(d)], suggesting that metal- and phosphate-binding residues may play a key role in both metal binding and DNA hydrolysis.
3.4. SaTatD employs Mg2+ ions for nuclease activity
To identify the metal ions that are favorable for catalytic reactions, a metal-dependent nuclease assay was performed with 2 mM Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ca2+ and 0.2 mM Zn2+ ions using full-sequence genomic DNA of SaTatD as a DNA substrate. Considering previous work on E. coli TatD (Chen, Li et al., 2014) and research which showed that a high concentration of Zn2+ can inhibit apoptosis, DNA fragmentation and nuclease activity (Giannakis et al., 1991; Ku et al., 2002), we adopted a tenfold lower concentration of Zn2+ than the other metal ions for the nuclease assay. In the DNase assay, a control group without SaTatD protein and an EDTA-treated group showed a similar band width, indicating that SaTatD without metal ions did not perform DNA hydrolysis [Fig. 5(a)]. Both the Mg2+- and Mn2+-treated groups revealed explicit DNase activity, but the Mg2+-treated group showed slightly stronger activity than the Mn2+-treated group. In contrast, the Ca2+- and Zn2+-treated groups showed similar DNase activity to that of the control and EDTA-treated groups. Consistently, SaTatD presented protein and metal (Mg2+) concentration-dependent DNase activity [Fig. 5(b)]. Furthermore, we performed a metal-dependent RNase assay, which showed a different tendency from the DNase assay. SaTatD exhibited relative activity levels in the presence of different metals as follows: Mg2+ > Ca2+ > Mn2+ >> Zn2+ = EDTA [Fig. 5(c)]. Taken together, these results confirmed that SaTatD bears Mg2+-dependent nuclease activity as a DNase and an RNase.
3.5. Glu92 and Glu202 have a crucial effect on the of SaTatD
A comparative analysis of the active sites of SaTatD and its homologs provided considerable insight into the catalytic mechanism of SaTatD. To further verify the key residues involved in DNA hydrolysis by SaTatD, we performed eight single-point mutations of the residues in the active site, H6A, H8A, H63A, E92A, H128A, H153A, E202A and D204A, as presented in Supplementary Table S1. We confirmed that the alanine mutants of the histidine cluster, including H6A, H8A, H128A, H153A and H63A, did not show significant alterations in DNase activity, despite these residues being key in metal and phosphate binding [Fig. 5(d)]. Asp204 was expected to contribute to the catalytic reaction, similar to its counterpart in E. coli TatD (Chen, Li et al., 2014), but its alanine mutant showed no meaningful alteration of the activity [Fig. 5(d)]. On the other hand, the mutants of the conserved residues Glu92 and Glu202 revealed an apparent reduction in DNase activity, indicating that these two glutamates are key residues for the catalytic reaction of SaTatD.
3.6. Putative DNA-binding mode of SaTatD
In this study, we observed clear electron density for two phosphates in the SaTatD. As mentioned above, a comparative analysis with the TatD–DNA complex structure from E. coli (PDB entry 4pe8) revealed that the binding positions of these two phosphates considerably resemble those of the scissile phosphates of DNA in E. coli TatD [Fig. 4(d)]. However, the two phosphates in our structure were closely bound to two Ni2+ ions, whereas PDB entry 4pe8 revealed a loose binding mode for the cleaved DNA, depicting the inactive DNA-bound form. To further understand the active DNA-binding mode of SaTatD, we performed in silico docking using HADDOCK (Dominguez et al., 2003) with His8, His63, Glu92, His128, Ser154 and Asp204 selected as `active residues' based on the binding mode of the phosphates. We hypothesized that SaTatD would bind to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in the dimeric structure [Fig. 6(a)]. However, Prediction_1 [Fig. 6(a)] proposed that dsDNA could not enter the active site in the dimeric structure owing to Loop1, Loop2 and Loop3, which were on both sides of the active site and formed the dimeric interface of SaTatD [Figs. 2(a) and 4(a)]. Considering the structural hindrance, we predicted the binding mode of the SaTatD monomer and a 3-mer dsDNA [Fig. 6(b)]. Prediction_2 [Fig. 6(b)] proposed that the 3-mer dsDNA might form interactions between the two interface areas of the SaTatD monomer composed of Loop1 or Loop2 and Loop3, revealing a binding mode similar to that of the two phosphates of SaTatD. Furthermore, an electrostatic view showed that the basic area composed of Loop2 and Loop3 on the left-side top region may contribute to the binding of elongated DNA [Fig. 6(b)]. The DNA-binding mode of the SaTatD monomer agrees with the SEC results using the gel-filtration standard. Taken together, the results of the structural and mutational studies and our docking model suggest a DNA-binding mode for monomeric SaTatD.
of4. Discussion
Despite interest in the Tat system that exports completely folded proteins, TatD has not thoroughly been investigated since there was no direct functional relationship between TatD and the other Tat proteins, including TatA, TatB and TatC. However, because TatD is an evolutionarily conserved protein and encoded in the tat operon with other Tat proteins (Sargent et al., 1998), this protein must play a crucial cellular role. Indeed, TatD has been reported to be relevant to the Tat-linked quality-control system, the degradation of abnormal proteins, apoptosis and DNA repair (Matos et al., 2009; Chen, Li et al., 2014; Qiu et al., 2005; Chen, Shen et al., 2014). In this study, our in-depth insights into SaTatD, a TatD-related nuclease from S. aureus, revealed the unique structural and functional features of the TatD proteins from Gram-positive bacteria.
This study describes the SaTatD at the atomic level using the SAD method. The previous Ni2+-bound monomeric structure (PDB entry 2gzx) from S. aureus, which shares 100% sequence identity with SaTatD, gave 2.2 Å resolution data that were less refined and were deposited in the PDB without an associated publication. In contrast, our dimeric structure of SaTatD is a clear atomic description at high resolution (1.85 Å) with unique binding of Ni2+ ions and phosphates. Although the overall structure of SaTatD had the ubiquitous TIM-barrel fold (Brändén, 1991; Nagano et al., 2002), the active site showed an intriguing binding mode of ligands that differed from other TatD homologs. To the best of our knowledge, there have not been reports of TatD structures with coordination by two phosphates. The two phosphates resembled considerably the scissile phosphates of three-nucleotide single-stranded DNA complexed with TatD from E. coli (PDB entry 4pe8; Chen, Li et al., 2014), and thus we concluded that the residues contributing to the binding of Ni2+ ions and phosphates could play a key role in the DNase activity of SaTatD. Moreover, we confirmed one nonproline and two proline cis-peptide bonds in this structure. A majority of enzymes usually adopt the trans form rather than the cis form. The occurrence rate of cis-Pro is slightly over 5%, and cis-nonPro is extremely rare (Williams et al., 2018). Thus, the presence of cis-peptides in this structure implies an important functional role. Indeed, Gly91–cis-Glu92 and Ala205–cis-Pro206 are likely to considerably affect the conformations of the conserved residues Glu92 and Asp204 and the active site. In His211–cis-Pro212, located in Loop3, His211 contributes to the conformation of the interface area, but apart from that the binding mode suggests that this basic residue may serve as a DNA-binding residue.
ofIn contrast to the structural description of metal ions, we identified that SaTatD has more efficient DNase and RNase activity with Mg2+ ions than with Mn2+ ions, which is consistent with previous TatD-related research (Lindenstrauss et al., 2010; Wexler et al., 2000). A mutational study to further explore the catalytic mechanism of SaTatD revealed that the two residues Glu92 and Glu202 have a critical effect on catalysis by SaTatD, even though the conserved residue Glu202, in particular, had no structural relevance to metal or phosphate binding. Mutants with changes at His63 and Asp204 rarely showed significant alterations in activity, although these residues play an important role in hydrolysis by E. coli TatD. In addition, E. coli TatD only showed nuclease activity for single-stranded while SaTatD efficiently trimmed dsDNA. This functional difference may be caused by the distinct difference in catalytic residues and may be owing to the evolutionary selection for a within the ubiquitous TIM-barrel fold (Singh et al., 2019).
As mentioned above, superposition of the SaTatD and E. coli TatD–DNA complexes revealed that the two phosphates bound to SaTatD are located in a similar position to the DNA bound to E. coli TatD. PO4(1) bound to SaTatD was located near the 3′-end phosphate of the DNA in E. coli TatD, and PO4(2) was proximal to the 5′-end phosphate of the DNA in E. coli TatD. In addition, considering the presence of the only basic surface area to be identified near the active site of SaTatD, the 5′-end of DNA should extend to the basic area, whereas the 3′-end of DNA should enter the active site of SaTatD. This result corresponds to previous work on E. coli TatD (Chen, Li et al., 2014), suggesting that SaTatD may act as a 3′–5′ exonuclease, similar to E. coli TatD. Furthermore, in contrast to expectations, the first prediction of dsDNA binding to the SaTatD dimer revealed that the dimeric interface could be an obstacle to DNA entering the active site of SaTatD. Thus, we postulated that SaTatD may act as a monomer for DNA hydrolysis similar to most TatD-related DNases, which was supported by the gel-filtration results. However, we could not predict the long DNA-bound structure. Instead, to minimize the structural hindrance, we constructed a three-nucleotide dsDNA for docking with a monomer of SaTatD. Indeed, our second prediction proposed that the putative DNA-binding model fits in the active site well, suggesting that the basic surface area composed of Loop2 and Loop3 in the SaTatD monomer may play a critical role in recognition and binding of DNA in the active site of SaTatD, which may seize and trim the 3′-end of a 3′–5′ strand of the DNA duplex as a 3′–5′ exonuclease.
In conclusion, we have unveiled the SaTatD, a TatD-related nuclease from the Gram-positive organism S. aureus, and have provided the first description of a unique binding mode of Ni2+ ions and phosphates in TatD homologs. Structural insights into the active site of SaTatD and a mutational study provided further understanding of its catalytic mechanism. Furthermore, based on the unique binding mode of two phosphates, we suggested a DNA-binding mode for active SaTatD monomers. Our findings provide considerable insights into the relationships between the structure and mechanism of TatD proteins from Gram-positive bacteria and will be a valuable basis for research in fields related to TatD.
ofSupporting information
PDB reference: TatD, 6l25
Supporting information. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252520003917/lz5034sup1.pdf
Footnotes
‡These authors contributed equally to this work.
Acknowledgements
We thank the beamline staff members at the Pohang Light Source, Republic of Korea (BL-5C and BL-11C) and SPring-8, Japan (beamline BL44XU under the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute; proposal No. 2017B6773) for assistance with the X-ray diffraction experiments.
Funding information
This work was funded by the Korea Ministry of Science, Information, Communication, Technology and Future Planning and by grants from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (NRF-2018R1A2A1A19018526 and NRF-2018R1A5A2024425 to B.-J. Lee; NRF-2016R1C1B2014609 and NRF-2019R1H1A1102102 to S. J. Lee). This work was also supported by the 2019 BK21 Plus Project for Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmacy, and funded by International Program (ICR-20-05) of IPR, Osaka University, Japan.
References
Biswas, L., Biswas, R., Nerz, C., Ohlsen, K., Schlag, M., Schäfer, T., Lamkemeyer, T., Ziebandt, A. K., Hantke, K., Rosenstein, R. & Götz, F. (2009). J. Bacteriol. 191, 5921–5929. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Brändén, C.-I. (1991). Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1, 978–983. Google Scholar
Brünger, A. T. (1992). Nature, 355, 472–475. PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Chang, Z., Jiang, N., Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Yin, J., Wahlgren, M., Cheng, X., Cao, Y. & Chen, Q. (2016). Nat. Commun. 7, 11537. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, L., Shen, D., Sun, N., Xu, J., Wang, W. & Dou, D. (2014). Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 27, 1070–1080. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-C., Li, C.-L., Hsiao, Y.-Y., Duh, Y. & Yuan, H. S. (2014). Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 10776–10785. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chenna, R., Sugawara, H., Koike, T., Lopez, R., Gibson, T. J., Higgins, D. G. & Thompson, J. D. (2003). Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3497–3500. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Dijk, M. van & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2009). Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W235–W239. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Dominguez, C., Boelens, R. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2003). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 1731–1737. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Freudl, R. (2013). Res. Microbiol. 164, 664–674. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gannavaram, S. & Debrabant, A. (2012). Mol. Microbiol. 83, 926–935. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Giannakis, C., Forbes, I. J. & Zalewski, P. D. (1991). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181, 915–920. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gouet, P., Courcelle, E., Stuart, D. I. & Métoz, F. (1999). Bioinformatics, 15, 305–308. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Holm, L. & Rosenström, P. (2010). Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545–W549. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, Y., Zhao, E., Li, H., Xia, B. & Jin, C. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 15942–15944. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Karplus, P. A. & Diederichs, K. (2012). Science, 336, 1030–1033. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. (2007). J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ku, W.-Y., Liu, Y.-W., Hsu, Y.-C., Liao, C.-C., Liang, P.-H., Yuan, H. S. & Chak, K.-F. (2002). Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1670–1678. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kuroda, M., Ohta, T., Uchiyama, I., Baba, T., Yuzawa, H., Kobayashi, I., Cui, L., Oguchi, A., Aoki, K., Nagai, Y., Lian, J., Ito, T., Kanamori, M., Matsumaru, H., Maruyama, A., Murakami, H., Hosoyama, A., Mizutani-Ui, Y., Takahashi, N. K., Sawano, T., Inoue, R., Kaito, C., Sekimizu, K., Hirakawa, H., Kuhara, S., Goto, S., Yabuzaki, J., Kanehisa, M., Yamashita, A., Oshima, K., Furuya, K., Yoshino, C., Shiba, T., Hattori, M., Ogasawara, N., Hayashi, H. & Hiramatsu, K. (2001). Lancet, 357, 1225–1240. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., Moriarty, N. W., Oeffner, R. D., Poon, B. K., Prisant, M. G., Read, R. J., Richardson, J. S., Richardson, D. C., Sammito, M. D., Sobolev, O. V., Stockwell, D. H., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A. G., Videau, L. L., Williams, C. J. & Adams, P. D. (2019). Acta Cryst. D75, 861–877. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lindenstrauss, U., Matos, C. F., Graubner, W., Robinson, C. & Brüser, T. (2010). FEBS Lett. 584, 3644–3648. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Matos, C. F., Di Cola, A. & Robinson, C. (2009). EMBO Rep. 10, 474–479. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nagano, N., Orengo, C. A. & Thornton, J. M. (2002). J. Mol. Biol. 321, 741–765. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Qiu, J., Yoon, J.-H. & Shen, B. (2005). J. Biol. Chem. 280, 15370–15379. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sargent, F., Bogsch, E. G., Stanley, N. R., Wexler, M., Robinson, C., Berks, B. C. & Palmer, T. (1998). EMBO J. 17, 3640–3650. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Singh, D., Rahi, A., Kumari, R., Gupta, V., Gautam, G., Aggarwal, S., Rehan, M. & Bhatnagar, R. (2019). J. Cell. Biochem. 120, 11318–11330. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wallace, A. C., Laskowski, R. A. & Thornton, J. M. (1995). Protein Eng. 8, 127–134. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Wang, W., Liu, F., Jiang, N., Lu, H., Yang, N., Feng, Y., Sang, X., Cao, Y. & Chen, Q. (2018). Front. Microbiol. 9, 1023. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Wexler, M., Sargent, F., Jack, R. L., Stanley, N. R., Bogsch, E. G., Robinson, C., Berks, B. C. & Palmer, T. (2000). J. Biol. Chem. 275, 16717–16722. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Williams, C. J., Videau, L. L., Richardson, D. C. & Richardson, J. S. (2018). bioRxiv, 324517. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.