research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

IUCrJ
ISSN: 2052-2525

MRC2020: improvements to Ximdisp and the MRC image-processing programs

crossmark logo

aMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom, bScience & Technology Facilities Council, Research Complex at Harwell, Harwell, Didcot OX11 0FA, United Kingdom, cSun Yat Sen University, School of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China, and dVerna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: jms@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk, rh15@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk

Edited by E. Bullitt, Boston University School of Medicine, USA (Received 26 May 2023; accepted 20 July 2023; online 26 July 2023)

The great success of single-particle electron cryo-microscopy (cryoEM) during the last decade has involved the development of powerful new computer programs and packages that guide the user along a recommended processing workflow, in which the wisdom and choices made by the developers help everyone, especially new users, to obtain excellent results. The ability to carry out novel, non-standard or unusual combinations of image-processing steps is sometimes compromised by the convenience of a standard procedure. Some of the older programs were written with great flexibility and are still very valuable. Among these, the original MRC image-processing programs for structure determination by 2D crystal and helical processing alongside general-purpose utility programs such as Ximdisp, label, imedit and twofile are still available. This work describes an updated version of the MRC software package (MRC2020) that is freely available from CCP-EM. It includes new features and improvements such as extensions to the MRC format that retain the versatility of the package and make it particularly useful for testing novel computational procedures in cryoEM.

1. Introduction

There has been a revolution in the structural determination of biological complexes by electron cryo-microscopy (cryoEM) over the last fifty years. Advances in specimen grid technology, microscopes, cryo-stages, detectors, processing software and automation of all these procedures have combined to allow superb images to be obtained showing structures at resolutions that rival both X-ray and electron crystallography. The introduction of maximum likelihood methods into the software used for single-particle analysis has been crucial to this success and underpins the most recent advances. The earlier program packages such as Spider and Imagic, as well as the original MRC image-processing programs for structure determination by 2D crystal and helical processing together with utility programs such as Ximdisp, label, imedit and twofile are still available. Though these programs offer great flexibility for many purposes, this is accompanied by less convenience for pursuing the streamlined path that many users prefer. The MRC program package has been widely distributed since its inception with contributions from many authors. During that time, changes in computers, compilers and operating systems together with recent extensions to data formats have necessitated program updates, including extensions to the MRC format agreed in 2014. These improvements and extensions are described in this paper.

2. Historical background

The computer programs for the first reconstruction of 3D helical structures (DeRosier & Klug, 1968[De Rosier, D. J. & Klug, A. (1968). Nature, 217, 130-134.]) were described earlier (DeRosier & Moore, 1970[DeRosier, D. J. & Moore, P. B. (1970). J. Mol. Biol. 52, 355-369.]). At that time, specimens for microscopy were negatively stained and the resulting micrographs recorded on film which was then densitometered to produce a digitized image. Central to the computational analysis of the images were programs for the calculation of Fourier transforms, based on the Cooley–Tukey algorithm (Cooley & Tukey, 1965[Cooley, J. W. & Tukey, J. W. (1965). Math. C. 19, 297-301.]). These programs provided the foundation for the MRC image-processing package (Crowther et al., 1996[Crowther, R. A., Henderson, R. & Smith, J. M. (1996). J. Struct. Biol. 116, 9-16.]). The original suite of programs, written in Fortran, were designed specifically for the analysis and calculation of helical structures and resulted in a 3D density map. Following the helical programs, further software was written, also in Fortran, for analysis of images of icosahedral viruses (Crowther et al., 1970[Crowther, R. A., Amos, L. A., Finch, J. T., De Rosier, D. J. & Klug, A. (1970). Nature, 226, 421-425.], 1971[Crowther, R. A. (1971). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 261, 221-230.]), and subsequently yet more for analysis of electron diffraction data and micrographs of 2D crystal specimens (Henderson et al., 1986[Henderson, R., Baldwin, J. M., Downing, K. H., Lepault, J. & Zemlin, F. (1986). Ultramicroscopy, 19, 147-178.]).

It became clear that a general-purpose format for the storage and computation of digitized images and Fourier transforms was necessary. The format, known as MAPFORMAT, was originally designed in 1982 by David Agard and Phil Evans for handling crystallographic density maps. The MRC format was derived from MAPFORMAT with the specific purpose of storing electron microscope density maps as well as Fourier transforms. The format incorporated a 1024 byte header, carrying information about the file, such as the number of pixels in x, y, z mode for data type etc. This was (optionally) followed by 80 bytes or more of symmetry data before writing the image density as single-byte, signed 2 byte integers or 4 byte floating point data. Fourier transforms were written as complex*4 or complex*8 and the phase origin was stored in the header. Utility programs label, imedit, twofile, padbox, Ximdisp and others were added over the years.

As in crystallography, the original programs in the MRC image-processing suite, helical, icosahedral or 2D crystal, were limited to structure determination that made use of the symmetry of the specimen. However, the technique of single-particle analysis, which entirely avoids this restriction, originally embodied in packages such as SPIDER (Frank et al., 1981[Frank, J., Shimkin, B. & Dowse, H. (1981). Ultramicroscopy, 6, 343-357.]; Shaikh et al., 2008[Shaikh, T. R., Gao, H., Baxter, W. T., Asturias, F. J., Boisset, N., Leith, A. & Frank, J. (2008). Nat. Protoc. 3, 1941-1974.]) and IMAGIC (van Heel & Keegstra, 1981[Heel, M. van & Keegstra, W. (1981). Ultramicroscopy, 7, 113-129.]; van Heel et al., 1996[Heel, M. van, Harauz, G., Orlova, E. V., Schmidt, R. & Schatz, M. (1996). J. Struct. Biol. 116, 17-24.]), was also under development. More recently, other packages such as RELION (Scheres, 2012[Scheres, S. H. (2012). J. Mol. Biol. 415, 406-418.]), XMIPP (Sorzano et al., 2004[Sorzano, C. O. S., Marabini, R., Velázquez-Muriel, J., Bilbao-Castro, J. R., Scheres, S. H. W., Carazo, J. M. & Pascual-Montano, A. (2004). J. Struct. Biol. 148, 194-204.]), FREALIGN (Grigorieff, 2016[Grigorieff, N. (2016). Methods Enzymol. 579, 191-226.]), CryoSPARC (Punjani et al., 2017[Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. (2017). Nat. Methods, 14, 290-296.]), EMAN (Ludtke et al., 1999[Ludtke, S. J., Baldwin, P. R. & Chiu, W. (1999). J. Struct. Biol. 128, 82-97.]), SPHIRE or SPARX for high-resolution electron microscopy (Wagner et al., 2019[Wagner, T., Merino, F., Stabrin, M., Moriya, T., Antoni, C., Apelbaum, A., Hagel, P., Sitsel, O., Raisch, T., Prumbaum, D., Quentin, D., Roderer, D., Tacke, S., Siebolds, B., Schubert, E., Shaikh, T. R., Lill, P., Gatsogiannis, C. & Raunser, S. (2019). Commun. Biol. 2, 218.]), cisTEM (Grant et al., 2018[Grant, T., Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. (2018). eLife, 7, e35383.]), and others have revolutionized structure determination. At the same time, innovations of specimen preparation by plunge-freezing (Dubochet et al., 1988[Dubochet, J., Adrian, M., Chang, J. J., Homo, J. C., Lepault, J., McDowall, A. W. & Schultz, P. (1988). Q. Rev. Biophys. 21, 129-228.]) and the revolution in microscopes (Nakane et al., 2020[Nakane, T., Kotecha, A., Sente, A., McMullan, G., Masiulis, S., Brown, P. M. G. E., Grigoras, I. T., Malinauskaite, L., Malinauskas, T., Miehling, J., Uchański, T., Yu, L., Karia, D., Pechnikova, E. V., de Jong, E., Keizer, J., Bischoff, M., McCormack, J., Tiemeijer, P., Hardwick, S. W., Chirgadze, D. Y., Murshudov, G., Aricescu, R. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2020). Nature, 587, 152-156.]), grid (Russo & Passmore, 2016[Russo, C. J. & Passmore, L. A. (2016). J. Struct. Biol. 193, 33-44.]) and detector development (McMullan et al., 2014[McMullan, G., Faruqi, A. R., Clare, D. & Henderson, R. (2014). Ultramicroscopy, 147, 156-163.]) have brought cryoEM in line with crystallography in terms of resolution. Furthermore, it has provided the ability to determine structures of large, flexible biological complexes and many membrane proteins or membrane protein complexes that have proved very difficult to crystallize.

However, since microscopes now collect a series of frames (movies) for each recorded micrograph image, the demand for computing power and data storage has increased dramatically. To meet these demands, microscope manufacturers and users have economized data storage by adopting 2 byte unsigned integers as the preferred recording format, which is mode 6 in the MRC format. Added to this modification, they also store new information (metadata) between the 1024 byte header and the multi-frame image intensity data. These extensions of the original format are described in a paper on MRC2014 (Cheng et al., 2015[Cheng, A., Henderson, R., Mastronarde, D., Ludtke, S. J., Schoenmakers, R. H. M., Short, J. M., Marabini, R., Dallakyan, S., Agard, D. & Winn, M. (2015). J. Struct. Biol. 192, 146-150.]). In addition, there is now mode 12 [16-bit float (IEEE754)], a new feature introduced in RELION (version 4.0) to save a factor of two in required disc space (Kimanius et al., 2021[Kimanius, D., Dong, L., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2021). Biochem. J. 478, 4169-4185.]); and mode 101 (4-bit data packed two per byte), proposed by Agard and Mastronarde in 2015 for use in SerialEM (Schorb et al., 2019[Schorb, M., Haberbosch, I., Hagen, W. J. H., Schwab, Y. & Mastronarde, D. N. (2019). Nat. Methods, 16, 471-477.]). Neither of these extensions are included in MRC2020. Since the first release of the MRC package over 50 years ago, computers, operating system requirements and compilers have also changed. To accommodate all these changes, along with new user requests, we therefore updated and extended all the MRC programs and present here the 2020 version of the MRC image-processing package.

3. Overview

Our earlier paper (Crowther et al., 1996[Crowther, R. A., Henderson, R. & Smith, J. M. (1996). J. Struct. Biol. 116, 9-16.]) described in detail the functionality of each of the applications programs included in the package. Programs accessing the MRC data files are linked with libraries providing the I/O: imsubs (now imsubs2020), written in Fortran, provides the interface to a set of CCP4 routines, written in C, which themselves directly read/write the MRC files (Winn et al., 2002[Winn, M. D., Ashton, A. W., Briggs, P. J., Ballard, C. C. & Patel, P. (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 1929-1936.]). Some programs also require libraries such as ifftlib, which provides the Fourier transform calculations, and plot2klib for plotting output. All of these are included in the package. The graphics display program Ximdisp (Smith, 1999[Smith, J. M. (1999). J. Struct. Biol. 125, 223-228.]) requires X11/R5 or higher and the Athena widget set Xaw, and calls the Fortran interface library Ximagelibf.for, which accesses Ximagelibc.c, written in C. Other libraries, included in the distributed package, are also required by this program.

4. Changes to computers, operating systems and compilers

Before the year 2000, endianness varied between different computer systems. Big-endian CPUs are now rare but at the time it was necessary for the programs, when reading a file, to determine the endianness of the computer which wrote the file. The ability to ascertain endianness is a feature of the subroutine package imsubs2020, which continues to determine the architecture of the machine that wrote the file and proceeds accordingly, printing an error message if the architecture is incompatible with the CPU running the program. Around the same time that this feature was installed, it emerged that CCP4 had decided to include a machine stamp in the header to allow software reading the file to determine endianness. However, the machine stamp was written in the same position as the MRC programs used to store the phase origin for Fourier transforms. The phase origin was then moved to a new position where it currently remains.

5. Program modifications

Many changes to the programs represent bug fixes. Most were flagged by newer, more stringent compilers and have been corrected. The helical programs have been extended to provide the ability to work on bigger Fourier transforms up to 4096 × 4096 (Short et al., 2013[Short, J. M., Berriman, J. A., Kübel, C., El-Hachemi, Z., Naubron, J.-V. & Balaban, T. S. (2013). ChemPhysChem, 14, 3209-3214.]). These programs continue to be useful for calculating starting models and helical parameters from structures to be calculated by single-particle processing. The 2D crystal processing programs have also been maintained in their original form (Henderson et al., 1990[Henderson, R., Baldwin, J. M., Ceska, T. A., Zemlin, F., Beckmann, E. & Downing, K. H. (1990). J. Mol. Biol. 213, 899-929.]), but many of them have been incorporated into or improved in the 2dx package (Gipson et al., 2007[Gipson, B., Zeng, X., Zhang, Z. Y. & Stahlberg, H. (2007). J. Struct. Biol. 157, 64-72.]). Ximdisp (Smith, 1999[Smith, J. M. (1999). J. Struct. Biol. 125, 223-228.]) has been extensively modified and now includes editing a stack of images (Böttcher et al., 1997[Böttcher, B., Wynne, S. A. & Crowther, R. A. (1997). Nature, 386, 88-91.]) displayed as a gallery (Fig. 1[link]), boxing of helical filaments (Short et al., 2016[Short, J. M., Liu, Y., Chen, S., Soni, N., Madhusudhan, M. S., Shivji, M. K. K. & Venkitaraman, A. (2016). Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 9017-9030.]) (Fig. 2[link]), improvements to spline fitting a helical filament, new colour tables for display, interactive Fourier transform display from any section from a stack using the scrolling section option and numerous other options. The interactive Fourier transform option is useful for assessing the quality of the image and for selecting the best diffracting stretches of a helical filament, (for example, Fig. 3[link], which shows the transform of part of a filament of the acetylcholine receptor (Unwin, 2005[Unwin, N. (2005). J. Mol. Biol. 346, 967-989.]). Another extension to Ximdisp, which facilitates particle picking for tilt-pair analysis, is described in the next section.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Multi-image editing from a stack of images in Ximdisp: a gallery of images can be displayed from a multi-stack file. Poor quality images can be removed manually and are marked by a cross (yellow). On completion an output stack file is written, with the marked images removed and a list of their numbers in a separate file. The illustration shows hepatitis B virus core particles (see Böttcher et al., 1997[Böttcher, B., Wynne, S. A. & Crowther, R. A. (1997). Nature, 386, 88-91.]; and EMD-13734).
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Filament boxing option of Ximdisp. The user sets the box width before selecting each end of each candidate filament. Box corners are stored in a file which can be read by a separate program for calculating box centres with a user set inter-box distance. The box centres are stored in a file which can be read directly into RELION for processing. The illustration shows HsRad51 complexed with single-stranded DNA (EMD-8183; Short et al., 2016[Short, J. M., Liu, Y., Chen, S., Soni, N., Madhusudhan, M. S., Shivji, M. K. K. & Venkitaraman, A. (2016). Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 9017-9030.]).
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Interactive display of Fourier transforms from helical structures in Ximdisp. In this mode, the filament is boxed (a), then vertically aligned (inset) before calculation and display (b) of the transform. It is possible to sample the quality of various parts of the filament prior to selection by moving the box and re-calculating the transform. The illustration shows an acetyl­choline receptor tube (see Unwin, 2005[Unwin, N. (2005). J. Mol. Biol. 346, 967-989.]; and EMD-11239).

6. Tilt-pair particle picking

Analysis of two images recorded from the same particle or particles at two different specimen tilt angles was proposed (Rosenthal & Henderson, 2003[Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. (2003). J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721-745.]) as a way to validate and optimize determination of the angular parameters in single-particle cryoEM, and to establish absolute handedness. Its use was demonstrated on a single specimen, the catalytic domain of icosahedral pyruvate de­hydrogenase. Its value was subsequently extended to a range of different specimens of varied size and symmetry (Henderson et al., 2011[Henderson, R., Chen, S., Chen, J. Z., Grigorieff, N., Passmore, L. A., Ciccarelli, L., Rubinstein, J. L., Crowther, R. A., Stewart, P. L. & Rosenthal, P. B. (2011). J. Mol. Biol. 413, 1028-1046.]), which showed that the accuracy of particle orientations increased with the particle size, but there was a size gap between 3.5 and 50 MDa. To fill this gap, we have used the new particle-picking feature in Ximdisp to carry out tilt-pair analysis of two new samples with molecular weights of 8 and 10 MDa. The first is Haliotis diversicolor hemocyanin (Zhang et al., 2013[Zhang, Q., Dai, X., Cong, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, D., Dougherty, M. T., Wang, J., Ludtke, S. J., Schmid, M. F. & Chiu, W. (2013). Structure, 21, 604-613.]), with molecular weight 8 MDa and D5 symmetry (Fig. 4[link], Fig. 5[link]). The second is Norwalk virus-like particles (Prasad et al., 1999[Prasad, B. V. V., Hardy, M. E., Dokland, T., Bella, J., Rossmann, M. G. & Estes, M. K. (1999). Science, 286, 287-290.]), with molecular weight 10 MDa and icosahedral symmetry (Fig. 5[link]). Together these two new tilt-pair plots (Fig. 5[link]) confirm the trend (Henderson et al., 2011[Henderson, R., Chen, S., Chen, J. Z., Grigorieff, N., Passmore, L. A., Ciccarelli, L., Rubinstein, J. L., Crowther, R. A., Stewart, P. L. & Rosenthal, P. B. (2011). J. Mol. Biol. 413, 1028-1046.]) that the accuracy of angular orientation determination improves with the size of the particle. The tilt-pair particle-picking feature in Ximdisp provides a complementary increase in ease of use to that provided by the tilt-pair web server (Wasilewski & Rosenthal, 2014[Wasilewski, S. & Rosenthal, P. B. (2014). J. Struct. Biol. 186, 122-131.]).

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Picking particles from tilted pairs in Ximdisp. The specimen imaged in this example is Haliotis diversicolor hemocyanin, molecular weight 8 MDa (EMD-5585, EMD-5586; Zhang et al., 2013[Zhang, Q., Dai, X., Cong, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, D., Dougherty, M. T., Wang, J., Ludtke, S. J., Schmid, M. F. & Chiu, W. (2013). Structure, 21, 604-613.]). Images were recorded on film at 200 keV. Ximdisp was used to pick particles manually from the left image (a) which was recorded with a specimen tilt angle of −5°. This was then transferred by Ximdisp to the middle image (b) which was recorded at a tilt angle of +5°. The positions of a few particles in the middle image were corrected manually and the shifts calculated by Ximdisp were used to correct the remaining particles automatically, as seen in the right image (c). A plot was obtained after alignment of both −5 and +5° sets of particles to the starting model and the tilt axis and angle describing the geometrical relationship between the two sets of particles calculated. The resulting tilt-pair plot is shown in Fig. 5[link](a).
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Examples of tilt-pair plots from two different samples, used to validate determination of the single-particle orientations that are needed to calculate the 3D structure. In (a) the change in the angle of the Haliotis diversicolor hemocyanin particles is clustered at 10°, which was the angular difference between the two images, indicating the validity of the 3D model. The structure of this hemocyanin was solved subsequently to a resolution of 4.5 Å (Zhang et al., 2013[Zhang, Q., Dai, X., Cong, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, D., Dougherty, M. T., Wang, J., Ludtke, S. J., Schmid, M. F. & Chiu, W. (2013). Structure, 21, 604-613.]). In (b) a similar experiment on Norwalk virus-like particles with a 5° change in tilt angle between the two images is shown. In this experiment, three pairs of images were recorded, with particles from different image pairs shown in different colours. With molecular weights of 8 and 10 MDa, respectively, these two additional tilt-pair parameter plots fill in the gap in particle size, between 3 and 50 MDa, that was missing from an earlier publication (PDB code 1ihm; Prasad et al., 1999[Prasad, B. V. V., Hardy, M. E., Dokland, T., Bella, J., Rossmann, M. G. & Estes, M. K. (1999). Science, 286, 287-290.]) on a range of different specimens.

7. New additions

Several new utility programs have been added, including interpo3D which reinterpolates a 3D map involving rotation, translation or magnification change, and swapxy which changes the handedness of 2D or 3D images and maps. Others such as taperedge which smoothly equalizes the densities along the boundaries, so that Fourier transforms do not show artefactual stripes along the axes, have been improved. An updated list of the MRC programs is available in Table S1 of the supporting information.

8. Conclusions

Additions, extensions and enhancements to what could otherwise be described as a mature, legacy package of MRC image-processing programs have proved to be useful in applications where novel combinations of steps are needed. Each program can be used on its own for simple stand-alone tasks, or as part of a scripted combination without integration into a larger suite, thus providing a flexible toolkit for new developments. The MRC2020 software package is freely available under an open-source licence (BSD) from the CCP-EM website at https://www.ccpem.ac.uk. Typically, there have been around 50 downloads of the MRC2020 package per year during the last 2 years. CCP-EM also maintains the `mrcfile' Python library for reading, writing and validating MRC data files. A description of the full software framework for cryoEM managed by CCP-EM, including the MRC image-processing package that is the topic of this publication, is given by Burnley et al. (2017[Burnley, T., Palmer, C. M. & Winn, M. (2017). Acta Cryst. D73, 469-477.]).

Supporting information


Funding information

The work was funded by the Medical Research Council (grant No. MC_U105184322 awarded to RH). Funding for CCP-EM is from MRC (grant No. MR/V000403/1 awarded to MW). BVVP acknowledges support from NIH (grant No. PO1 AI057788).

References

First citationBöttcher, B., Wynne, S. A. & Crowther, R. A. (1997). Nature, 386, 88–91.  PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBurnley, T., Palmer, C. M. & Winn, M. (2017). Acta Cryst. D73, 469–477.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationCheng, A., Henderson, R., Mastronarde, D., Ludtke, S. J., Schoenmakers, R. H. M., Short, J. M., Marabini, R., Dallakyan, S., Agard, D. & Winn, M. (2015). J. Struct. Biol. 192, 146–150.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationCooley, J. W. & Tukey, J. W. (1965). Math. C. 19, 297–301.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationCrowther, R. A. (1971). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 261, 221–230.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationCrowther, R. A., Amos, L. A., Finch, J. T., De Rosier, D. J. & Klug, A. (1970). Nature, 226, 421–425.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationCrowther, R. A., Henderson, R. & Smith, J. M. (1996). J. Struct. Biol. 116, 9–16.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationDe Rosier, D. J. & Klug, A. (1968). Nature, 217, 130–134.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationDeRosier, D. J. & Moore, P. B. (1970). J. Mol. Biol. 52, 355–369.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationDubochet, J., Adrian, M., Chang, J. J., Homo, J. C., Lepault, J., McDowall, A. W. & Schultz, P. (1988). Q. Rev. Biophys. 21, 129–228.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationFrank, J., Shimkin, B. & Dowse, H. (1981). Ultramicroscopy, 6, 343–357.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationGipson, B., Zeng, X., Zhang, Z. Y. & Stahlberg, H. (2007). J. Struct. Biol. 157, 64–72.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationGrant, T., Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. (2018). eLife, 7, e35383.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationGrigorieff, N. (2016). Methods Enzymol. 579, 191–226.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationHeel, M. van, Harauz, G., Orlova, E. V., Schmidt, R. & Schatz, M. (1996). J. Struct. Biol. 116, 17–24.  CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationHeel, M. van & Keegstra, W. (1981). Ultramicroscopy, 7, 113–129.  Google Scholar
First citationHenderson, R., Baldwin, J. M., Ceska, T. A., Zemlin, F., Beckmann, E. & Downing, K. H. (1990). J. Mol. Biol. 213, 899–929.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationHenderson, R., Baldwin, J. M., Downing, K. H., Lepault, J. & Zemlin, F. (1986). Ultramicroscopy, 19, 147–178.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationHenderson, R., Chen, S., Chen, J. Z., Grigorieff, N., Passmore, L. A., Ciccarelli, L., Rubinstein, J. L., Crowther, R. A., Stewart, P. L. & Rosenthal, P. B. (2011). J. Mol. Biol. 413, 1028–1046.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationKimanius, D., Dong, L., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2021). Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationLudtke, S. J., Baldwin, P. R. & Chiu, W. (1999). J. Struct. Biol. 128, 82–97.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationMcMullan, G., Faruqi, A. R., Clare, D. & Henderson, R. (2014). Ultramicroscopy, 147, 156–163.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationNakane, T., Kotecha, A., Sente, A., McMullan, G., Masiulis, S., Brown, P. M. G. E., Grigoras, I. T., Malinauskaite, L., Malinauskas, T., Miehling, J., Uchański, T., Yu, L., Karia, D., Pechnikova, E. V., de Jong, E., Keizer, J., Bischoff, M., McCormack, J., Tiemeijer, P., Hardwick, S. W., Chirgadze, D. Y., Murshudov, G., Aricescu, R. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2020). Nature, 587, 152–156.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationPrasad, B. V. V., Hardy, M. E., Dokland, T., Bella, J., Rossmann, M. G. & Estes, M. K. (1999). Science, 286, 287–290.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationPunjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. (2017). Nat. Methods, 14, 290–296.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationRosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. (2003). J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationRusso, C. J. & Passmore, L. A. (2016). J. Struct. Biol. 193, 33–44.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationScheres, S. H. (2012). J. Mol. Biol. 415, 406–418.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSchorb, M., Haberbosch, I., Hagen, W. J. H., Schwab, Y. & Mastronarde, D. N. (2019). Nat. Methods, 16, 471–477.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationShaikh, T. R., Gao, H., Baxter, W. T., Asturias, F. J., Boisset, N., Leith, A. & Frank, J. (2008). Nat. Protoc. 3, 1941–1974.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationShort, J. M., Berriman, J. A., Kübel, C., El–Hachemi, Z., Naubron, J.-V. & Balaban, T. S. (2013). ChemPhysChem, 14, 3209–3214.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationShort, J. M., Liu, Y., Chen, S., Soni, N., Madhusudhan, M. S., Shivji, M. K. K. & Venkitaraman, A. (2016). Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 9017–9030.  Web of Science CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSmith, J. M. (1999). J. Struct. Biol. 125, 223–228.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationSorzano, C. O. S., Marabini, R., Velázquez-Muriel, J., Bilbao-Castro, J. R., Scheres, S. H. W., Carazo, J. M. & Pascual-Montano, A. (2004). J. Struct. Biol. 148, 194–204.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationUnwin, N. (2005). J. Mol. Biol. 346, 967–989.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationWagner, T., Merino, F., Stabrin, M., Moriya, T., Antoni, C., Apelbaum, A., Hagel, P., Sitsel, O., Raisch, T., Prumbaum, D., Quentin, D., Roderer, D., Tacke, S., Siebolds, B., Schubert, E., Shaikh, T. R., Lill, P., Gatsogiannis, C. & Raunser, S. (2019). Commun. Biol. 2, 218.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationWasilewski, S. & Rosenthal, P. B. (2014). J. Struct. Biol. 186, 122–131.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationWinn, M. D., Ashton, A. W., Briggs, P. J., Ballard, C. C. & Patel, P. (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 1929–1936.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationZhang, Q., Dai, X., Cong, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, D., Dougherty, M. T., Wang, J., Ludtke, S. J., Schmid, M. F. & Chiu, W. (2013). Structure, 21, 604–613.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

IUCrJ
ISSN: 2052-2525