scientific commentaries\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

ISSN: 2052-2525

The resolution revolution revisited

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Though the world does not change with a change of paradigm, the scientist afterward works in a different world.

Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

In 2014 Werner Kühlbrandt wrote a Perspective entitled The Resolution Revolution (Kühlbrandt, 2014View full citation) about how we were entering a new era in molecular biology where structures of macromolecular complexes could now be determined at near-atomic resolution by electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM). The Perspective heralded the publication of a 3.2 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of the mitochondrial ribosome's large subunit (Amunts et al., 2014View full citation). While this ribosome structure was a spectacular advance at the time, showing that such a complex did not need to be crystallized to reach a resolution that would enable the building of an atomic model, reaching such a resolution is now a daily event using cryo-EM. In fact, there are now ∼1800 ribosome structures at better than 4.0 Å resolution deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB), with 36 of these at a resolution better than 2.0 Å. True atomic resolution (which by definition means that individual atoms are resolved) is not reached until 1.2–1.3 Å. If 3.2 Å is near-atomic resolution, than a 1.6 Å ribosome structure (Fromm et al., 2023View full citation) might be called `even nearer' atomic resolution.

Subramaniam, Kühlbrandt and Henderson have revisited the 2014 Perspective in this issue of IUCrJ (Subramaniam et al., 2026View full citation), providing a summary of the progress that has been made in cryo-EM and electron cryo-tomography (cryo-ET), as well as highlighting some of the issues and problems that will be likely addressed in the future. While near-atomic resolution structures by cryo-EM were quite rare 15 years ago, they are now the rule, and the exceptions are when such resolutions cannot be reached. The impact on structural biology has thus been profound, and Subramaniam et al. discuss this at some length.

What may be less appreciated is that cryo-EM is now beginning to make substantial contributions in fields such as chemistry and materials science. The main tool that has been typically used to understand the structures formed by the self-assembly of peptides and small molecules has been X-ray fiber diffraction, and more recently small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The structure of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), the very first virus ever isolated, was solved by X-ray fiber diffraction to 3.6 Å resolution in a monumental effort (Namba & Stubbs, 1986View full citation). Very few people these days use fiber diffraction, since it is far, far easier to simply use cryo-EM. In addition to requiring much less sample and reaching a higher resolution, one can directly generate maps in cryo-EM, while phasing the X-ray intensities collected in fiber diffraction is highly problematic. Thus, a 1.9 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of TMV (Weis et al., 2019View full citation) was generated from only 62 images!

The lanreotide octapeptide self-assembles into tubes that provide a slow-release pharmacological formulation in clinical use, and a fiber diffraction structure was published more than 20 years ago (Valéry et al., 2003View full citation). However, a more recent 2.5 Å cryo-EM structure (Pieri et al., 2022View full citation) of the lanreotide tubes was strikingly different from the original model, and revealed that the asymmetric unit was eight peptides, in eight different environments, with eight conformations. In contrast, the original fiber diffraction model assumed an asymmetric unit of two peptides. Similarly, a naphthalene-modified dipeptide has been shown by cryo-EM (Fig. 1[link]) to self-assemble into tubes with 18 peptides in the asymmetric unit, in 18 different environments, with 18 different conformations (Bianco et al., 2025View full citation).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The use of cryo-EM continues to grow outside of structural biology, such as in chemistry and materials science. This figure shows a 3.3 Å resolution cryo-EM map with an atomic model of an assembly of naphthalene-modified dipeptides (isoleucine-phenyl­alanine) (Bianco et al., 2025View full citation). Quite surprisingly, these dipeptides self-assemble into tubes with 18 peptides in the asymmetric unit, with 18 different conformations.

Techniques such as SAXS and MD cannot reliably be used to generate atomic models ab initio, but these techniques have dominated much of the literature on the self-assembly of peptides and small molecules. It is encouraging that cryo-EM is beginning to supplant those methods (Sonani et al., 2025View full citation). Factors that are currently limiting the applications outside of structural biology include lack of access to high-end instruments and lack of expertise in applying these methods. As cryo-EM matures, both of these obstacles are expected to become less significant.

It is challenging to predict exactly where cryo-EM will be in another ten years after the revolution. As they say in Denmark, `Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future'. Nevertheless, one can be optimistic that advances in hardware and software will continue to be made, enabling a larger and larger community of users to address many fundamental problems in biology and chemistry.

References

Return to citationAmunts, A., Brown, A., Bai, X. C., Llácer, J. L., Hussain, T., Emsley, P., Long, F., Murshudov, G., Scheres, S. H. & Ramakrishnan, V. (2014). Science 343, 1485–1489.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBianco, S., Sonani, R. R., Ghosh, D., Maurya, T., Bizien, T., Pincham, A., Smith, A. J., Inoue, K., Seddon, A., Vassalli, M., Egelman, E. H. & Adams, D. J. (2025). Matter 8, 102334.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationFromm, S. A., O'Connor, K. M., Purdy, M., Bhatt, P. R., Loughran, G., Atkins, J. F., Jomaa, A. & Mattei, S. (2023). Nat. Commun. 14, 1095.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationKühlbrandt, W. (2014). Science 343, 1443–1444.   PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationNamba, K. & Stubbs, G. (1986). Science 231, 1401–1406.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationPieri, L., Wang, F., Arteni, A. A., Vos, M., Winter, J. M., Le Du, M. H., Artzner, F., Gobeaux, F., Legrand, P., Boulard, Y., Bressanelli, S., Egelman, E. H. & Paternostre, M. (2022). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2120346119.   Google Scholar
Return to citationSonani, R., Bianco, S., Kreutzberger, M., Adams, D. & Egelman, E. (2025). Faraday Discuss. 260, 132–144.   CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSubramaniam, S., Kühlbrandt, W. & Henderson, R. (2026). IUCrJ, 13, https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252526003842.  Google Scholar
Return to citationValéry, C., Paternostre, M., Robert, B., Gulik-Krzywicki, T., Narayanan, T., Dedieu, J. C., Keller, G., Torres, M. L., Cherif-Cheikh, R., Calvo, P. & Artzner, F. (2003). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10258–10262.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationWeis, F., Beckers, M., von der Hocht, I. & Sachse, C. (2019). EMBO Rep. 20, EMBR201948451.   Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

ISSN: 2052-2525