Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C6H9N2OS2+·HSO4-·H2O, contains a heterocyclic cation, a hydrogen sulfate anion and a water mol­ecule. There are strong hydrogen bonds between the hydrogen sulfate anions and water mol­ecules, forming an infinite chain along the [010] direction, from which the cations are pendent. The steric, electronic and geometric features are compared with those of similar compounds. In this way, structural relationships are stated in terms of the influence of the sulfate group on the protonation of the heterocycle and on the tautomeric equilibrium in the solid state.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270108017502/gd3216sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270108017502/gd3216Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 697587

Comment top

Thiazolidinone derivatives are attractive targets for drug synthesis (Lesyk & Zimenkovsky, 2004) because these pharmacologically active compounds present various biological properties. For instance, antitumour (Lesyk et al., 2006), antimicrobial (Vicini et al., 2006), antidiarrhoeal (Mazzoni et al., 2006), anti-inflammatory (Ottanà et al., 2005) and antioxidant activities (Shimizu et al., 2002) have been attributed to them. In addition, they are potentially useful for neuropathic pain treatment (Shimizu et al., 2002). The synthesis and spectroscopic analysis of the title compound, (I), have been described previously (Hanefeld & Gunes, 1986). In the present paper, we report the structure of (I) (Fig. 1). A related compound, the monohydrated hydrogen sulfate salt of bis(pyrimethamine), crystallizes in the same space group (P212121) as (I) (Devi et al., 2006). Therefore, the presence of the hydrogen sulfate anion and the water molecule may play an important role in the assembly of these compounds.

The intramolecular geometric parameters of (I) were compared with those of similar structures deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version?; Allen, 2002) using Mogul (Bruno et al., 2004). The lengths of the C1—N1 [1.408 (3) Å] and C1O1 [1.218 (3) Å] bonds are typical of their types [average values 1.40 (1) and 1.21 (2) Å, respectively]. The length of the N1—C4 bond which links the two rings [1.357 (3) Å] is very similar to that of the corresponding bond [1.350 (5) Å] in the analogous compound, 1-(5-nitro-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)-2-imidazolidinone (Peeters et al., 1984), and these values are both typical for bonds of this type [average value 1.35 (1) Å].

Each of the rings adopts an envelope conformation, with atoms C2 and C6 in the flap positions of the 2-thiazolidinone and 2-thiazolyl groups, respectively. The largest deviation from the least-squares plane through the five atoms of the 2-thiazolidinone ring occurs for atom C2 [displacement 0.094 (2) Å], with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.0682 Å for the ring atoms. In the 2-thiazolyl ring, the largest displacement is for atom C6 [0.78 (22) Å], with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.0547 Å. The non-planarity of the rings arises from the adjacent CH2 groups within each ring (Raper et al., 1983; Corrêa et al., 2006). The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the two rings in the cation is only 2.1 (2)°, so that overall the cation is close to being planar.

Within the anion, the S—OH distance of 1.539 (2) Å is clearly distinct from the other three S—O distances, which are in the range 1.422 (2)–1.437 (2) Å, indicating that the H-atom site is static, rather than mobile between the O atoms. The O—S—O bond angles [103.9 (2)–114.2 (2)°] are typical of those found in hydrogen sulfate anions in crystalline salts.

The crystal packing of (I) is strongly stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonds (Table 1). Moreover, the presence of the water molecule and the hydrogen sulfate anion play a key role in the molecular aggregation, where the anions and water molecules form a helical chain of edge-fused hydrogen-bonded rings running along along the [100] direction (Fig. 2). Atom O5 acts as an acceptor from two neighbouring water molecules, while atom O1W acts as acceptor from the anion. The cation is linked to the anion via a strong N—H···O hydrogen bond (Table 1), so that the cations are all pendent from the water/anion chains.

Other hydrated sulfate and hydrogen sulfate salts containing organic cations have been described, in which the inorganic components form dimers (Lu et al., 2004), chains (Gomes et al., 1996), or networks in two and three dimensions (Warden et al., 2004; Białońska & Ciunik, 2005). In 4-carboxyphenylammonium perchlorate monohydrate (Athimoolam & Natarajan, 2006), the water molecules and the anions form chains of edge-fused hydrogen-bonded rings which resemble those reported here for (I).

Experimental top

The title compound was synthesized according a minor modification of the reported procedure (Hanefeld & Gunes, 1986), in which hydrogen peroxide was used as the oxidant instead of nitric acid. Prism-shaped [Needle in CIF tables - please clarify] colourless single crystals of (I) were obtained by slow evaporation of a solution in diethyl ether. The hydrogen sulfate and water components are by-products of the synthetic procedure.

Refinement top

Methylene, amine and hydroxyl H atoms were placed in idealized locations and refined using a riding model, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(Cmethylene, Namine) or Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(Ohydroxyl), and with C—H = 0.97 Å, N—H = 0.86 Å and O—H = 0.82 Å. Water H atoms were permitted to ride at the position derived from the difference maps, with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(Owater), giving O—H distances of 0.85 Å.

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The hydrogen bonds linking the water molecules and hydrogen sulfate anions of (I). [Symmetry codes: (i) x - 1, y, z; (ii) x - 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z; (iii); x + 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z; (iv) x + 1, y, z.]
2-(2-oxothiazolidin-3-yl)-4,5-dihydrothiazolium hydrogen sulfate monohydrate top
Crystal data top
C6H9N2OS2+·HO4S·H2OF(000) = 632
Mr = 304.36Dx = 1.711 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 10761 reflections
a = 5.8508 (2) Åθ = 2.9–27.5°
b = 13.0999 (4) ŵ = 0.65 mm1
c = 15.4187 (5) ÅT = 294 K
V = 1181.84 (7) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 40.14 × 0.05 × 0.03 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2266 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
CCD scansRint = 0.056
Absorption correction: analytical
(Alcock, 1970)
θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
Tmin = 0.878, Tmax = 0.966h = 77
14972 measured reflectionsk = 1616
2712 independent reflectionsl = 1819
Refinement top
Refinement on F2H-atom parameters constrained
Least-squares matrix: full w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0645P)2 + 0.1721P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.106Δρmax = 0.25 e Å3
S = 1.03Δρmin = 0.43 e Å3
2712 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 1126 Friedel pairs
158 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.04 (10)
0 restraints
Crystal data top
C6H9N2OS2+·HO4S·H2OV = 1181.84 (7) Å3
Mr = 304.36Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 5.8508 (2) ŵ = 0.65 mm1
b = 13.0999 (4) ÅT = 294 K
c = 15.4187 (5) Å0.14 × 0.05 × 0.03 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2712 independent reflections
Absorption correction: analytical
(Alcock, 1970)
2266 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.878, Tmax = 0.966Rint = 0.056
14972 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.106Δρmax = 0.25 e Å3
S = 1.03Δρmin = 0.43 e Å3
2712 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 1126 Friedel pairs
158 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.04 (10)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2155 (5)0.67390 (19)0.06591 (18)0.0387 (6)
C20.0215 (7)0.6715 (3)0.2066 (2)0.0718 (12)
H2A0.12080.72130.23390.086*
H2B0.01980.62070.24960.086*
C30.1430 (5)0.6217 (2)0.13284 (18)0.0446 (6)
H3A0.27730.6610.11730.054*
H3B0.19170.55360.14940.054*
C40.0405 (5)0.5646 (2)0.01473 (17)0.0352 (5)
C50.0866 (7)0.4898 (3)0.1634 (2)0.0620 (9)
H5A0.01460.43170.19110.074*
H5B0.15870.5310.2080.074*
C60.2599 (7)0.4543 (3)0.1011 (2)0.0725 (11)
H6A0.24130.38180.09030.087*
H6B0.41210.46570.12410.087*
N10.0136 (4)0.61595 (17)0.05889 (14)0.0347 (5)
N20.2291 (4)0.51180 (18)0.02068 (16)0.0438 (5)
H20.32910.51090.02020.053*
O10.3565 (4)0.68092 (16)0.00813 (14)0.0506 (5)
S10.23042 (15)0.73305 (6)0.16645 (5)0.0558 (2)
S20.12763 (14)0.56517 (6)0.10671 (5)0.0469 (2)
O1W0.2293 (5)0.2342 (2)0.09439 (17)0.0673 (7)
H1W0.12450.27830.08710.101*
H2W0.28540.22040.0450.101*
O20.5575 (5)0.46676 (19)0.10722 (19)0.0703 (7)
O30.5760 (5)0.3030 (2)0.17587 (18)0.0719 (8)
H30.47690.28470.14160.108*
O40.8613 (5)0.42366 (18)0.20498 (16)0.0662 (7)
O50.8428 (5)0.3492 (2)0.06472 (18)0.0786 (8)
S30.71458 (12)0.39105 (5)0.13578 (5)0.03976 (18)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0363 (13)0.0374 (13)0.0423 (14)0.0025 (11)0.0022 (12)0.0058 (11)
C20.071 (2)0.094 (3)0.050 (2)0.030 (2)0.0205 (19)0.0260 (19)
C30.0367 (14)0.0571 (17)0.0401 (14)0.0013 (13)0.0074 (12)0.0013 (13)
C40.0349 (13)0.0351 (11)0.0355 (13)0.0031 (11)0.0027 (10)0.0045 (11)
C50.080 (3)0.061 (2)0.0454 (18)0.0045 (19)0.0001 (18)0.0097 (15)
C60.057 (2)0.096 (3)0.064 (2)0.016 (2)0.0003 (19)0.035 (2)
N10.0331 (11)0.0379 (10)0.0331 (11)0.0028 (10)0.0025 (9)0.0001 (9)
N20.0389 (13)0.0493 (12)0.0433 (13)0.0051 (11)0.0019 (11)0.0060 (10)
O10.0403 (11)0.0622 (13)0.0493 (11)0.0118 (10)0.0048 (10)0.0090 (9)
S10.0577 (5)0.0596 (4)0.0502 (4)0.0164 (4)0.0034 (4)0.0093 (4)
S20.0447 (4)0.0593 (4)0.0368 (3)0.0016 (4)0.0054 (3)0.0001 (3)
O1W0.0518 (14)0.0804 (17)0.0697 (15)0.0044 (13)0.0074 (13)0.0120 (14)
O20.0630 (15)0.0595 (14)0.0884 (19)0.0233 (12)0.0160 (14)0.0126 (14)
O30.0696 (17)0.0795 (16)0.0666 (15)0.0310 (14)0.0173 (13)0.0333 (14)
O40.0704 (16)0.0734 (16)0.0548 (13)0.0134 (14)0.0217 (13)0.0004 (12)
O50.0621 (15)0.112 (2)0.0614 (15)0.0206 (16)0.0112 (13)0.0203 (15)
S30.0382 (3)0.0425 (3)0.0386 (3)0.0025 (3)0.0001 (3)0.0046 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—O11.218 (3)C5—S21.819 (4)
C1—N11.408 (3)C5—H5A0.97
C1—S11.735 (3)C5—H5B0.97
C2—C31.491 (4)C6—N21.462 (4)
C2—S11.791 (4)C6—H6A0.97
C2—H2A0.97C6—H6B0.97
C2—H2B0.97N2—H20.86
C3—N11.464 (3)O1W—H1W0.85
C3—H3A0.97O1W—H2W0.8494
C3—H3B0.97O2—S31.422 (2)
C4—N21.306 (4)O3—S31.539 (2)
C4—N11.357 (3)O3—H30.82
C4—S21.726 (3)O4—S31.435 (2)
C5—C61.473 (5)O5—S31.437 (3)
O1—C1—N1123.6 (3)H5A—C5—H5B108.2
O1—C1—S1125.9 (2)N2—C6—C5107.8 (3)
N1—C1—S1110.6 (2)N2—C6—H6A110.1
C3—C2—S1109.0 (2)C5—C6—H6A110.1
C3—C2—H2A109.9N2—C6—H6B110.1
S1—C2—H2A109.9C5—C6—H6B110.1
C3—C2—H2B109.9H6A—C6—H6B108.5
S1—C2—H2B109.9C4—N1—C1121.8 (2)
H2A—C2—H2B108.3C4—N1—C3122.1 (2)
N1—C3—C2108.5 (2)C1—N1—C3115.9 (2)
N1—C3—H3A110C4—N2—C6115.9 (3)
C2—C3—H3A110C4—N2—H2122.1
N1—C3—H3B110C6—N2—H2122.1
C2—C3—H3B110C1—S1—C293.79 (14)
H3A—C3—H3B108.4C4—S2—C590.00 (15)
N2—C4—N1121.2 (2)H1W—O1W—H2W107.7
N2—C4—S2115.2 (2)S3—O3—H3109.5
N1—C4—S2123.5 (2)O2—S3—O4114.16 (15)
C6—C5—S2109.4 (2)O2—S3—O5111.56 (18)
C6—C5—H5A109.8O4—S3—O5111.63 (17)
S2—C5—H5A109.8O2—S3—O3107.84 (16)
C6—C5—H5B109.8O4—S3—O3103.87 (14)
S2—C5—H5B109.8O5—S3—O3107.19 (18)
S1—C2—C3—N115.3 (4)C2—C3—N1—C112.3 (4)
S2—C5—C6—N213.4 (4)N1—C4—N2—C6175.9 (3)
N2—C4—N1—C1179.4 (2)S2—C4—N2—C65.1 (4)
S2—C4—N1—C10.5 (3)C5—C6—N2—C412.2 (4)
N2—C4—N1—C34.8 (4)O1—C1—S1—C2175.2 (3)
S2—C4—N1—C3174.1 (2)N1—C1—S1—C25.4 (2)
O1—C1—N1—C41.3 (4)C3—C2—S1—C112.2 (3)
S1—C1—N1—C4178.19 (19)N2—C4—S2—C52.8 (2)
O1—C1—N1—C3176.2 (3)N1—C4—S2—C5176.1 (2)
S1—C1—N1—C33.2 (3)C6—C5—S2—C49.6 (3)
C2—C3—N1—C4172.8 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1W—H1W···O5i0.851.922.755 (4)166
N2—H2···O20.861.982.816 (4)164
O1W—H2W···O5ii0.851.952.766 (4)161
O3—H3···O1W0.821.752.550 (4)164
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H9N2OS2+·HO4S·H2O
Mr304.36
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)294
a, b, c (Å)5.8508 (2), 13.0999 (4), 15.4187 (5)
V3)1181.84 (7)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.65
Crystal size (mm)0.14 × 0.05 × 0.03
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionAnalytical
(Alcock, 1970)
Tmin, Tmax0.878, 0.966
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
14972, 2712, 2266
Rint0.056
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.040, 0.106, 1.03
No. of reflections2712
No. of parameters158
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.25, 0.43
Absolute structureFlack (1983), with 1126 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.04 (10)

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000), SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1W—H1W···O5i0.851.922.755 (4)166
N2—H2···O20.861.982.816 (4)164
O1W—H2W···O5ii0.851.952.766 (4)161
O3—H3···O1W0.821.752.550 (4)164
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds