Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536802009601/na6166sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536802009601/na6166Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 189861
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 293 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.007 Å Some non-H atoms missing
- R factor = 0.038
- wR factor = 0.081
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 11.9
checkCIF results
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry
Alert Level A:
ABSMU_01 Alert A The ratio of given/expected absorption coefficient lies outside the range 0.90 <> 1.10 Calculated value of mu = 3.653 Value of mu given = 1.826 DENSD_01 Alert A The ratio of the submitted crystal density and that calculated from the formula is outside the range 0.90 <> 1.10 Crystal density given = 1.964 Calculated crystal density = 3.927 PLAT_701 Alert A Bond Calc 2.391(6), Rep 1.335(6), Dev. 176.00 Sigma N1 -C1 1.555 1.555 PLAT_701 Alert A Bond Calc 2.943(7), Rep 1.499(8), Dev. 206.29 Sigma C3 -C3 1.555 7.565 PLAT_701 Alert A Bond Calc 2.258(9), Rep 1.375(7), Dev. 98.11 Sigma C4 -C5 1.555 1.555 PLAT_702 Alert A Angle Calc 28.6(3), Rep 115.9(4), Dev. 291.00 Sigma C5 -N1 -C1 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT_702 Alert A Angle Calc 178.1(5), Rep 121.4(3), Dev. 113.40 Sigma C4 -C3 -C3 1.555 1.555 7.565 PLAT_702 Alert A Angle Calc 92.2(4), Rep 119.4(5), Dev. 68.00 Sigma C5 -C4 -C3 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT_702 Alert A Angle Calc 32.0(2), Rep 124.3(5), Dev. 461.50 Sigma N1 -C5 -C4 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT_722 Alert A Angle Calc 147.64, Rep 118.10, Dev. 29.54 Deg. N1 -C1 -H1A 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT_722 Alert A Angle Calc 149.96, Rep 120.30, Dev. 29.66 Deg. C5 -C4 -H4A 1.555 1.555 1.555
Alert Level B:
PLAT_722 Alert B Angle Calc 117.83, Rep 120.30, Dev. 2.47 Deg. C3 -C4 -H4A 1.555 1.555 1.555
Alert Level C:
PLAT_701 Alert C Bond Calc 1.237(9), Rep 1.249(8), Dev. 1.33 Sigma N2 -O1 1.555 1.555 PLAT_701 Alert C Bond Calc 1.374(7), Rep 1.387(7), Dev. 1.86 Sigma C3 -C4 1.555 1.555 PLAT_702 Alert C Angle Calc 119.6(7), Rep 120.4(7), Dev. 1.14 Sigma O2 -N2 -O1 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT_711 Alert C BOND Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ AG AG N1 PLAT_711 Alert C BOND Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ AG AG N1 PLAT_711 Alert C BOND Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 C1 C2 PLAT_711 Alert C BOND Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 C2 C3 PLAT_711 Alert C BOND Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 C2 H2A PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ AG N1 AG N1 PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ AG C5 N1 AG PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ AG C1 N1 AG PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 N1 C1 C2 PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 C2 C1 H1A PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 C1 C2 C3 PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 C1 C2 H2A PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 C3 C2 H2A PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 C2 C3 C4 PLAT_712 Alert C ANGLE Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ C2 C2 C3 C3 PLAT_732 Alert C Angle Calc 32.0(2), Rep 124.3(5) .... 2.50 s.u-Ratio N1 -C5 -C4 1.555 1.555 1.555 General Notes
FORMU_01 There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:C10 H8 Ag1 N3 O3 Atom count from the _atom_site data: C5 H4 Ag0.5 N1.5 O1.5 CELLZ_01 From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 8 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum C10 H8 Ag N3 O3 TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data atom Z*formula cif sites diff C 80.00 40.00 40.00 H 64.00 32.00 32.00 Ag 8.00 4.00 4.00 N 24.00 12.00 12.00 O 24.00 12.00 12.00 Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected. ALERT: Large difference may be due to a symmetry error - see SYMMG tests CHEMW_03 From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 8 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_weight 326.06 TEST: Calculate formula weight from _atom_site_* atom mass num sum C 12.01 5.00 60.06 H 1.01 4.00 4.03 N 14.01 1.50 21.01 O 16.00 1.50 24.00 Ag 107.87 0.50 53.93 Calculated formula weight 163.03 ALERT: The ratio of given/expected molecular weight as calculated from the _atom_site* data lies outside the range 0.90 <> 1.10
11 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
1 Alert Level B = Potential problem
19 Alert Level C = Please check
Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: XPREP; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Siemens, 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
[Ag(NO3)(C10H8N2)] | Dx = 1.964 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 326.06 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Orthorhombic, Pnma | Cell parameters from 63 reflections |
a = 10.5315 (16) Å | θ = 2.9–25.1° |
b = 11.5313 (17) Å | µ = 1.83 mm−1 |
c = 9.0821 (13) Å | T = 293 K |
V = 1102.9 (3) Å3 | Prism, colorless |
Z = 8 | 0.40 × 0.16 × 0.10 mm |
F(000) = 640 |
Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer | 1010 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 749 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.047 |
ω scans | θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 2.9° |
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements) (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −12→11 |
Tmin = 0.524, Tmax = 0.835 | k = −13→7 |
3206 measured reflections | l = −9→10 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.081 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.18 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0257P)2 + 1.3172P] P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1010 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
85 parameters | Δρmax = 0.68 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.42 e Å−3 |
Experimental. empirical from equivalent reflections (XEMP in SHELXTL; Siemens,1994) |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Ag1 | 0.88204 (6) | 0.7500 | 0.14699 (7) | 0.0490 (2) | |
N1 | 0.8851 (4) | 0.5585 (3) | 0.1352 (4) | 0.0435 (10) | |
C8 | 0.8852 (5) | 0.3150 (4) | 0.1322 (5) | 0.0379 (12) | |
O2 | 1.1243 (5) | 0.7500 | 0.2832 (7) | 0.0615 (15) | |
N2 | 1.0853 (7) | 0.7500 | 0.4128 (9) | 0.0475 (17) | |
C5 | 0.8033 (5) | 0.4977 (4) | 0.0537 (7) | 0.0576 (15) | |
H5A | 0.7450 | 0.5383 | −0.0034 | 0.069* | |
C4 | 0.9667 (6) | 0.4967 (4) | 0.2146 (7) | 0.0582 (16) | |
H4A | 1.0252 | 0.5367 | 0.2720 | 0.070* | |
C3 | 0.9703 (5) | 0.3776 (4) | 0.2175 (7) | 0.0562 (16) | |
H3A | 1.0293 | 0.3393 | 0.2761 | 0.067* | |
O1 | 0.9698 (5) | 0.7500 | 0.4373 (7) | 0.0699 (17) | |
C1 | 0.8004 (5) | 0.3785 (4) | 0.0490 (7) | 0.0544 (15) | |
H1A | 0.7413 | 0.3408 | −0.0101 | 0.065* | |
O3 | 1.1628 (6) | 0.7500 | 0.5169 (7) | 0.0604 (15) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Ag1 | 0.0544 (4) | 0.0232 (3) | 0.0695 (5) | 0.000 | −0.0022 (4) | 0.000 |
N1 | 0.047 (2) | 0.0235 (19) | 0.060 (3) | 0.0025 (18) | 0.000 (3) | 0.0004 (19) |
C8 | 0.041 (3) | 0.023 (2) | 0.050 (3) | −0.001 (2) | 0.009 (3) | 0.000 (2) |
O2 | 0.057 (3) | 0.078 (4) | 0.050 (4) | 0.000 | 0.003 (4) | 0.000 |
N2 | 0.059 (5) | 0.024 (3) | 0.060 (5) | 0.000 | 0.002 (4) | 0.000 |
C5 | 0.054 (3) | 0.035 (3) | 0.083 (4) | 0.003 (3) | −0.019 (3) | 0.004 (3) |
C4 | 0.077 (4) | 0.031 (3) | 0.067 (4) | −0.004 (3) | −0.022 (3) | 0.000 (3) |
C3 | 0.069 (4) | 0.027 (3) | 0.072 (4) | 0.000 (3) | −0.023 (3) | 0.002 (3) |
O1 | 0.034 (3) | 0.098 (4) | 0.077 (4) | 0.000 | 0.012 (3) | 0.000 |
C1 | 0.055 (4) | 0.033 (3) | 0.076 (4) | 0.002 (2) | −0.021 (3) | −0.005 (3) |
O3 | 0.060 (4) | 0.068 (4) | 0.053 (4) | 0.000 | −0.001 (3) | 0.000 |
Ag—N1i | 2.211 (4) | N2—O1 | 1.249 (8) |
Ag—N1 | 2.211 (4) | C2—C3 | 1.380 (7) |
N1—C5 | 1.329 (6) | C2—H2A | 0.9300 |
N1—C1 | 1.335 (6) | C3—C4 | 1.387 (7) |
C1—C2 | 1.375 (7) | C3—C3ii | 1.499 (8) |
C1—H1A | 0.9300 | C4—C5 | 1.375 (7) |
N2—O2 | 1.237 (8) | C4—H4A | 0.9300 |
N2—O3 | 1.246 (8) | C5—H5A | 0.9300 |
N1i—Ag—N1 | 174.2 (2) | C1—C2—C3 | 119.9 (5) |
C5—N1—C1 | 115.9 (4) | C1—C2—H2A | 120.0 |
C5—N1—Ag | 121.2 (3) | C3—C2—H2A | 120.0 |
C1—N1—Ag | 122.8 (3) | C2—C3—C4 | 116.6 (4) |
N1—C1—C2 | 123.8 (5) | C2—C3—C3ii | 122.0 (3) |
N1—C1—H1A | 118.1 | C4—C3—C3ii | 121.4 (3) |
C2—C1—H1A | 118.1 | C5—C4—C3 | 119.4 (5) |
O2—N2—O3 | 119.6 (8) | C5—C4—H4A | 120.3 |
O2—N2—O1 | 120.4 (7) | C3—C4—H4A | 120.3 |
O3—N2—O1 | 120.0 (7) | N1—C5—C4 | 124.3 (5) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+3/2, z; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register