Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Extensive and precise X-ray diffraction data for xylitol have been used to test different approaches to estimate nuclear parameters for H atoms in charge-density studies. The parameters from a neutron diffraction study of the same compound were taken as a reference. The resulting static charge densities obtained for the different approaches based on a multipole model were subjected to a topological analysis. The comparative analysis led to the following results. The procedure of extending the X-H bond to match bond lengths from neutron diffraction studies provides the best agreement with the neutron positional parameters. An isotropic model for the atomic displacements of H atoms is highly unsatisfactory and leads to significant deviations for the properties of the bond critical points including those that only involve non-H atoms. Anisotropic displacement parameters for H atoms can be derived from the X-ray data that are in agreement with the values from the neutron study, and the resulting charge-density models are in good agreement with the reference model. The anisotropic displacement parameters for H atoms are derived from the X-ray data as a sum of the external (rigid-body) and internal vibrations. The external vibrations are obtained from a TLS analysis of the ADPs of the non-H atoms and the internal vibrations from analysis of neutron diffraction studies of related compounds. The results from the analysis of positional and thermal parameters were combined to devise a `best anisotropic' model, which was employed for three other systems where X-ray and neutron data were available. The results from the topological analysis of these systems confirm the success of the `best anisotropic' model in providing parameters for the H atoms that give charge densities in agreement with the reference models based on H-atom parameters derived from neutron diffraction.
Supporting information
Data collection: Enraf-Nonius Express; cell refinement: Enraf-Nonius Express; data reduction: DREADD (Blessing, 1987); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: VALRAY (Stewart, 1998).
(xylitol-multipole-model)
top
Crystal data top
C5H12O5 | Dx = 1.540 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 152.15 | Melting point: 366 K |
Orthorhombic, P212121 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 8.264 (4) Å | Cell parameters from 20 reflections |
b = 8.901 (2) Å | µ = 0.14 mm−1 |
c = 8.9223 (14) Å | T = 122 K |
V = 656.3 (4) Å3 | Prism, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.37 × 0.32 × 0.26 mm |
F(000) = 328 | |
Data collection top
Enraf Nonius CAD4 diffractometer | θmax = 51.4°, θmin = 3.2° |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | h = −18→18 |
Graphite monochromator | k = −19→19 |
ω 2θ scans | l = −19→19 |
33102 measured reflections | 5 standard reflections every 100 reflections |
7320 independent reflections | intensity decay: 10.4% |
6651 reflections with I > 2σ(I) | |
Refinement top
Refinement on F2 | H-atom parameters not refined |
Least-squares matrix: full | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.013 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.0001 |
S = 0.65 | Δρmax = 0.16 (6) e Å−3 |
7320 reflections | Δρmin = −0.15 (6) e Å−3 |
366 parameters | Extinction correction: Becker-Coppens |
0 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 3931 (118) |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure: Flack H D (1983), Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881 |
Secondary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: 0.0 (2) |
Hydrogen site location: from neutron diffraction study | |
Special details top
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles. |
Refinement. NOTICE: Multipole refinement using VALRAY (Stewart et al., 2000).
Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted
R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on
F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F,
with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression
of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating
R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of
reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are
statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-
factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
O1 | 0.67854 (2) | 0.22878 (2) | 0.42170 (2) | 0.0 (1) | |
O2 | 0.61485 (2) | 0.43608 (2) | 0.18251 (2) | 0.0 (1) | |
O3 | 0.31808 (2) | 0.43113 (2) | 0.04008 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
O4 | 0.22908 (2) | 0.12952 (2) | 0.10845 (2) | 0.0 (1) | |
O5 | −0.08877 (2) | 0.20499 (2) | 0.21617 (2) | 0.0 (1) | |
C1 | 0.52462 (1) | 0.29375 (2) | 0.39061 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
C2 | 0.50069 (1) | 0.32292 (1) | 0.22441 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
C3 | 0.32769 (1) | 0.37544 (1) | 0.18985 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
C4 | 0.20082 (1) | 0.25170 (1) | 0.21004 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
C5 | 0.03183 (1) | 0.31477 (2) | 0.18557 (2) | 0.0 (1) | |
H1A | 0.51269 (1) | 0.40156 (1) | 0.45202 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H1B | 0.43176 (1) | 0.21677 (1) | 0.43329 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H2 | 0.52623 (1) | 0.21900 (1) | 0.16109 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H3 | 0.29794 (1) | 0.46794 (1) | 0.26822 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H4 | 0.20730 (1) | 0.20947 (1) | 0.32600 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H5B | 0.01970 (1) | 0.35648 (1) | 0.06950 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H5A | 0.01310 (1) | 0.41026 (1) | 0.26178 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H11 | 0.75601 (1) | 0.24315 (1) | 0.33761 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H12 | 0.65213 (1) | 0.41634 (1) | 0.08046 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H13 | 0.32675 (1) | 0.54153 (1) | 0.04502 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H14 | 0.27659 (1) | 0.04897 (1) | 0.16671 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
H15 | −0.11834 (1) | 0.15675 (1) | 0.12088 (1) | 0.0 (1) | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
O1 | 0.00946 (5) | 0.01627 (4) | 0.00997 (4) | 0.00067 (4) | −0.00081 (5) | 0.00064 (4) |
O2 | 0.01079 (4) | 0.01418 (4) | 0.01141 (4) | −0.00311 (4) | 0.00084 (4) | −0.00058 (4) |
O3 | 0.01331 (4) | 0.01242 (4) | 0.00941 (4) | 0.00055 (3) | −0.00058 (4) | 0.00053 (3) |
O4 | 0.01202 (4) | 0.01104 (4) | 0.01144 (4) | 0.00173 (4) | −0.00160 (4) | −0.00167 (4) |
O5 | 0.00921 (5) | 0.01774 (4) | 0.01281 (4) | −0.00177 (4) | 0.00148 (5) | −0.00174 (4) |
C1 | 0.00931 (5) | 0.01576 (4) | 0.00890 (4) | 0.00041 (4) | 0.00020 (5) | −0.00037 (4) |
C2 | 0.00833 (4) | 0.01155 (3) | 0.00866 (3) | −0.00036 (3) | −0.00018 (4) | −0.00099 (3) |
C3 | 0.00876 (4) | 0.01118 (3) | 0.00882 (3) | 0.00024 (3) | −0.00016 (4) | −0.00102 (3) |
C4 | 0.00827 (4) | 0.01189 (4) | 0.00879 (4) | 0.00019 (3) | −0.00029 (4) | −0.00056 (3) |
C5 | 0.00872 (4) | 0.01276 (5) | 0.01514 (5) | 0.00085 (4) | −0.00010 (4) | −0.00149 (4) |
H1A | 0.0336 (8) | 0.0274 (7) | 0.0264 (8) | 0.0081 (7) | −0.0024 (9) | −0.0112 (8) |
H1B | 0.0205 (7) | 0.0399 (7) | 0.0283 (6) | −0.0070 (8) | 0.00175 (1) | 0.0123 (8) |
H2 | 0.0210 (6) | 0.0202 (6) | 0.0264 (6) | 0.0012 (7) | 0.0011 (7) | −0.0072 (8) |
H3 | 0.0247 (7) | 0.0196 (6) | 0.0224 (6) | 0.0023 (5) | −0.0004 (6) | −0.0066 (7) |
H4 | 0.0250 (7) | 0.0287 (6) | 0.0160 (6) | −0.0004 (5) | −0.0008 (8) | 0.0049 (6) |
H5B | 0.0248 (7) | 0.0325 (7) | 0.0285 (7) | −0.0002 (7) | −0.0053 (9) | 0.0112 (8) |
H5A | 0.0261 (8) | 0.0267 (7) | 0.0478 (8) | 0.0024 (8) | 0.0038 (8) | −0.01806 (13) |
H11 | 0.0181 (6) | 0.0317 (6) | 0.0213 (6) | −0.0012 (7) | 0.0045 (8) | 0.0034 (7) |
H12 | 0.0286 (8) | 0.0302 (7) | 0.0219 (7) | −0.0047 (7) | 0.0071 (8) | −0.0019 (8) |
H13 | 0.0318 (8) | 0.0176 (6) | 0.0228 (7) | −0.0010 (6) | 0.0010 (6) | 0.0023 (7) |
H14 | 0.0334 (9) | 0.0195 (7) | 0.0278 (7) | 0.0086 (6) | −0.0030 (7) | 0.0014 (8) |
H15 | 0.0275 (8) | 0.0279 (7) | 0.0226 (6) | −0.0064 (7) | 0.0002 (8) | −0.0070 (7) |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email
support@iucr.org for assistance.