Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801011874/wn6031sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801011874/wn6031Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 170872
A solution of CuCl2·6H2O (0.085 g, 0.5 mmol) and tetrahydroxy-1,4-benzoquinone (0.10 g, 0.5 mmol) in methanol solution (20 ml) was stirred for 30 min at room temperature, then 2,2'-bipyridine (0.5 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred for 1 h to give a green solution; this was filtered. Deep-green crystals were obtained by keeping the solution exposed to air for about a week. A green single-crystal was selected for X-ray diffraction.
H-atom positions were generated geometrically and the H atoms were allowed to ride on their respective parent C atoms.
Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1994); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SMART; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXL97; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Fig. 1. Part of the polymer chain of (I), showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids and the labelling of the asymmetric unit. |
[Cu(C2O4)(C10H8N2)] | Dx = 1.799 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 307.74 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Orthorhombic, Pna21 | Cell parameters from 172 reflections |
a = 8.0762 (11) Å | θ = 2.5–25.1° |
b = 9.9366 (13) Å | µ = 1.93 mm−1 |
c = 14.1558 (19) Å | T = 293 K |
V = 1136.0 (3) Å3 | Plate, green |
Z = 4 | 0.35 × 0.28 × 0.21 mm |
F(000) = 620 |
Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer | 1545 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1084 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.060 |
ω scans | θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 2.5° |
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements) (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −9→9 |
Tmin = 0.408, Tmax = 0.458 | k = −11→6 |
3348 measured reflections | l = −16→9 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.109 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0407P)2 + 0.3497P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.05 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
1545 reflections | Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3 |
172 parameters | Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 |
1 restraint | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 100 Friedel pairs treated independently |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: 0.35 (4) |
[Cu(C2O4)(C10H8N2)] | V = 1136.0 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 307.74 | Z = 4 |
Orthorhombic, Pna21 | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 8.0762 (11) Å | µ = 1.93 mm−1 |
b = 9.9366 (13) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 14.1558 (19) Å | 0.35 × 0.28 × 0.21 mm |
Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer | 1545 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements) (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 1084 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.408, Tmax = 0.458 | Rint = 0.060 |
3348 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.109 | Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3 |
S = 1.05 | Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 |
1545 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 100 Friedel pairs treated independently |
172 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: 0.35 (4) |
1 restraint |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cu1 | 0.12533 (13) | 0.43841 (8) | 0.13972 (12) | 0.0312 (3) | |
N1 | 0.2076 (10) | 0.5805 (6) | 0.2270 (5) | 0.0292 (18) | |
N2 | 0.0617 (10) | 0.6035 (6) | 0.0650 (5) | 0.0295 (17) | |
C1 | 0.3229 (14) | 0.2147 (10) | 0.1817 (6) | 0.027 (2) | |
C2 | 0.4065 (15) | 0.2653 (9) | 0.0896 (8) | 0.037 (3) | |
C3 | 0.2798 (14) | 0.5587 (9) | 0.3112 (6) | 0.041 (2) | |
H1 | 0.2996 | 0.4706 | 0.3301 | 0.049* | |
H2 | 0.3792 | 0.6410 | 0.4255 | 0.049* | |
H3 | 0.3125 | 0.8607 | 0.3876 | 0.049* | |
H4 | 0.1987 | 0.9018 | 0.2380 | 0.049* | |
H5 | 0.0677 | 0.9232 | 0.0968 | 0.049* | |
H6 | −0.0537 | 0.9206 | −0.0497 | 0.049* | |
H7 | −0.1046 | 0.7167 | −0.1245 | 0.049* | |
H8 | −0.0245 | 0.5232 | −0.0497 | 0.049* | |
C4 | 0.3246 (14) | 0.6604 (12) | 0.3692 (8) | 0.058 (3) | |
C5 | 0.2896 (18) | 0.7907 (12) | 0.3463 (9) | 0.055 (3) | |
C6 | 0.2177 (13) | 0.8146 (8) | 0.2582 (8) | 0.045 (3) | |
C7 | 0.1746 (13) | 0.7099 (10) | 0.2020 (7) | 0.031 (2) | |
C8 | 0.0942 (13) | 0.7189 (9) | 0.1094 (6) | 0.030 (3) | |
C9 | 0.0485 (13) | 0.8425 (8) | 0.0659 (7) | 0.038 (2) | |
C10 | −0.0240 (14) | 0.8408 (9) | −0.0207 (8) | 0.048 (3) | |
C11 | −0.0542 (18) | 0.7206 (11) | −0.0654 (8) | 0.046 (3) | |
C12 | −0.0070 (13) | 0.6056 (9) | −0.0195 (7) | 0.043 (3) | |
O1 | 0.3684 (9) | 0.1046 (5) | 0.2147 (5) | 0.0405 (16) | |
O2 | 0.2098 (9) | 0.2882 (6) | 0.2169 (4) | 0.0379 (16) | |
O3 | 0.5154 (8) | 0.1896 (5) | 0.0536 (4) | 0.0361 (16) | |
O4 | 0.3647 (8) | 0.3769 (5) | 0.0591 (4) | 0.0355 (15) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cu1 | 0.0360 (5) | 0.0233 (4) | 0.0343 (5) | −0.0008 (5) | −0.0004 (7) | −0.0027 (7) |
N1 | 0.041 (5) | 0.025 (4) | 0.021 (4) | −0.003 (4) | 0.000 (4) | −0.002 (3) |
N2 | 0.032 (4) | 0.025 (4) | 0.031 (4) | −0.001 (3) | 0.000 (4) | −0.004 (3) |
C1 | 0.030 (6) | 0.027 (5) | 0.026 (5) | 0.001 (5) | −0.004 (4) | 0.006 (4) |
C2 | 0.040 (8) | 0.028 (6) | 0.043 (6) | −0.003 (5) | −0.004 (5) | 0.001 (5) |
C3 | 0.055 (7) | 0.042 (5) | 0.025 (5) | −0.005 (6) | −0.005 (5) | 0.002 (5) |
C4 | 0.063 (9) | 0.073 (8) | 0.038 (6) | −0.006 (6) | −0.008 (6) | −0.006 (6) |
C5 | 0.056 (10) | 0.061 (8) | 0.049 (8) | −0.009 (7) | −0.001 (7) | −0.027 (7) |
C6 | 0.046 (7) | 0.030 (5) | 0.058 (7) | −0.006 (5) | 0.015 (6) | −0.016 (5) |
C7 | 0.031 (6) | 0.035 (5) | 0.027 (6) | −0.013 (5) | 0.005 (5) | −0.015 (5) |
C8 | 0.037 (7) | 0.019 (4) | 0.033 (7) | −0.005 (4) | 0.008 (5) | −0.003 (4) |
C9 | 0.047 (6) | 0.020 (4) | 0.046 (6) | 0.009 (5) | 0.010 (6) | 0.004 (5) |
C10 | 0.051 (7) | 0.042 (6) | 0.050 (6) | 0.009 (5) | 0.009 (6) | 0.016 (6) |
C11 | 0.058 (9) | 0.047 (6) | 0.032 (6) | 0.006 (6) | 0.000 (6) | 0.010 (5) |
C12 | 0.053 (7) | 0.032 (5) | 0.043 (6) | 0.006 (5) | −0.003 (6) | −0.006 (5) |
O1 | 0.038 (4) | 0.035 (3) | 0.049 (4) | 0.002 (3) | 0.006 (4) | 0.017 (3) |
O2 | 0.047 (5) | 0.033 (3) | 0.033 (4) | 0.008 (3) | 0.007 (3) | 0.005 (3) |
O3 | 0.046 (4) | 0.031 (3) | 0.031 (4) | 0.014 (3) | 0.007 (3) | 0.008 (3) |
O4 | 0.047 (4) | 0.024 (3) | 0.035 (3) | 0.001 (3) | 0.003 (4) | 0.013 (3) |
Cu1—O2 | 1.972 (6) | C2—O4 | 1.237 (10) |
Cu1—O3i | 1.973 (6) | C2—O3 | 1.265 (11) |
Cu1—N1 | 1.991 (7) | C3—C4 | 1.352 (13) |
Cu1—N2 | 2.018 (7) | C4—C5 | 1.365 (15) |
Cu1—O4 | 2.327 (6) | C5—C6 | 1.395 (16) |
Cu1—O1i | 2.369 (7) | C6—C7 | 1.355 (13) |
N1—C3 | 1.343 (11) | C7—C8 | 1.466 (12) |
N1—C7 | 1.360 (11) | C8—C9 | 1.423 (12) |
N2—C12 | 1.319 (12) | C9—C10 | 1.359 (14) |
N2—C8 | 1.334 (11) | C10—C11 | 1.373 (14) |
C1—O1 | 1.245 (10) | C11—C12 | 1.369 (14) |
C1—O2 | 1.271 (11) | O1—Cu1ii | 2.369 (7) |
C1—C2 | 1.552 (10) | O3—Cu1ii | 1.973 (6) |
O2—Cu1—O3i | 90.6 (2) | O2—C1—C2 | 117.1 (8) |
O2—Cu1—N1 | 94.5 (3) | O4—C2—O3 | 125.6 (11) |
O3i—Cu1—N1 | 172.4 (3) | O4—C2—C1 | 117.8 (9) |
O2—Cu1—N2 | 173.6 (3) | O3—C2—C1 | 116.6 (8) |
O3i—Cu1—N2 | 94.9 (3) | N1—C3—C4 | 122.3 (9) |
N1—Cu1—N2 | 80.4 (3) | C3—C4—C5 | 120.6 (10) |
O2—Cu1—O4 | 77.6 (2) | C4—C5—C6 | 117.4 (10) |
O3i—Cu1—O4 | 84.3 (2) | C7—C6—C5 | 120.0 (9) |
N1—Cu1—O4 | 102.3 (3) | C6—C7—N1 | 121.5 (10) |
N2—Cu1—O4 | 99.7 (2) | C6—C7—C8 | 126.3 (10) |
O2—Cu1—O1i | 85.3 (3) | N1—C7—C8 | 112.2 (9) |
O3i—Cu1—O1i | 76.5 (2) | N2—C8—C9 | 119.2 (9) |
N1—Cu1—O1i | 98.2 (3) | N2—C8—C7 | 117.1 (9) |
N2—Cu1—O1i | 99.1 (3) | C9—C8—C7 | 123.7 (9) |
O4—Cu1—O1i | 154.15 (17) | C10—C9—C8 | 119.4 (8) |
C3—N1—C7 | 117.9 (8) | C9—C10—C11 | 120.2 (9) |
C3—N1—Cu1 | 125.5 (6) | C12—C11—C10 | 117.3 (11) |
C7—N1—Cu1 | 116.3 (7) | N2—C12—C11 | 124.1 (9) |
C12—N2—C8 | 119.8 (8) | C1—O1—Cu1ii | 104.4 (6) |
C12—N2—Cu1 | 126.6 (6) | C1—O2—Cu1 | 117.8 (6) |
C8—N2—Cu1 | 113.7 (6) | C2—O3—Cu1ii | 116.6 (7) |
O1—C1—O2 | 124.8 (9) | C2—O4—Cu1 | 106.9 (7) |
O1—C1—C2 | 118.2 (8) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z; (ii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Cu(C2O4)(C10H8N2)] |
Mr | 307.74 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Pna21 |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 8.0762 (11), 9.9366 (13), 14.1558 (19) |
V (Å3) | 1136.0 (3) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.93 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.35 × 0.28 × 0.21 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Siemens SMART CCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Empirical (using intensity measurements) (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.408, 0.458 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3348, 1545, 1084 |
Rint | 0.060 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.596 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.051, 0.109, 1.05 |
No. of reflections | 1545 |
No. of parameters | 172 |
No. of restraints | 1 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.41, −0.46 |
Absolute structure | Flack (1983), 100 Friedel pairs treated independently |
Absolute structure parameter | 0.35 (4) |
Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1994), SMART, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97.
Cu1—O2 | 1.972 (6) | Cu1—N2 | 2.018 (7) |
Cu1—O3i | 1.973 (6) | Cu1—O4 | 2.327 (6) |
Cu1—N1 | 1.991 (7) | Cu1—O1i | 2.369 (7) |
O2—Cu1—O3i | 90.6 (2) | N2—Cu1—O4 | 99.7 (2) |
O2—Cu1—N1 | 94.5 (3) | O2—Cu1—O1i | 85.3 (3) |
O3i—Cu1—N2 | 94.9 (3) | O3i—Cu1—O1i | 76.5 (2) |
N1—Cu1—N2 | 80.4 (3) | N1—Cu1—O1i | 98.2 (3) |
O2—Cu1—O4 | 77.6 (2) | N2—Cu1—O1i | 99.1 (3) |
O3i—Cu1—O4 | 84.3 (2) |
Symmetry code: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z. |
Oxalate-bridged polymeric compounds have attracted much attention due to their interesting magnetic properties (Decurtins et al., 1994, and references therein). By reacting CuCl2, 2,2'-bipyridine (2,2'-bipy) and tetrahydroxy-1,4-benzoquinone, the title complex, [Cu(C2O4)(2,2'-bipy)]n, was obtained, with oxalate anions as bridging ligands. So far, there have been only a few such compounds reported, viz. [Cu(C2O4)(2,2'-bipy)].2H2O (Fitzgerald et al., 1982), [Mn(C2O4)(2,2'-bipy)]n (Deguenon et al., 1990) and [Fe(C2O4)(2,2'-bipy)]n (Fun et al., 1999).
The crystal structure of the title compound, which is isostructural with the FeII compound, consists of neutral [Cu(C2O4)(2,2'-bipy)] units, with the Cu atoms linked by C2O4 ligands to form infinite zigzag chains along the a axis. The Cu atom has a distorted octahedral coordination consisting of two N atoms from the chelating 2,2'-bipy ligand, two O atoms of the oxalate ligands in equatorial positions, and two O atoms of the oxalate ligands in axial positions. The largest deviation from the plane defined by Cu, N1, N2, O2 and O3i is -0.089Å at atom N1 [symmetry code: (i) x-1/2, -y+1/2, z]. The Cu—N bond lengths [1.991 (7) and 2.018 (7)Å] and the Cu—N—Cu bite angle [80.4 (3)°] are comparable to the corresponding values in [Cu2(bipy)2(H20)2(C2O4)]X2.[Cu(bipy)(C2O4)] (X = NO3-, BF4 or ClO4), [1.992 (2), 1.987 (2)Å and 82.92°; Gleizes et al., 1992]. The Cu—O distances [1.972 (6)–2.369 (7) Å] and the O—Cu—O bite angles [90.6 (2) and 85.3 (3)°] are in agreement with those in [Cu2(bipy)2(C2O4)(H20)2][Cu(bipy)(C2O4)](NO3)2 [1.971 (1)–2.247 (1)Å and 84.64 (3)°; Shi et al., 1997]; the bite angles are also close to those in [Mn(C2O4)(2,2'-bipy)]n (Deguenon et al., 1990) and [Fe(C2O4)(2,2'-bipy)]n (Fun et al., 1999). The dihedral angle between the planar pyridyl rings is 2.01°. The shortest Cu···Cu distances within the chain is 5.507Å. Neighbouring chains are connected to each other by van der Waals interactions, with the bipyridyl ligands stacked between the chains. The shortest Cu···Cu distance between adjacent chains is 7.793Å.