research papers
First experiments on diffraction-enhanced imaging at LNLS
aInstituto de Física, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brazil, bLaboratório Nacional de Luz Síncrotron, Campinas, SP, Brazil, cDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, dCOPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, and eInstituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
*Correspondence e-mail: giles@ifi.unicamp.br
Diffraction-enhanced images have been obtained using two silicon crystals in a non-dispersive set-up at the XRD2 beamline at the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS). A first asymmetrically cut silicon crystal using the (333) reflection vertically expanded the monochromated beam from 1 mm to 20 mm allowing the imaging of the whole sample without movements. A symmetrically cut Si(333) second crystal was used as a Bragg analyzer. Images of biological samples including human tissue were recorded using a direct-conversion CCD detector resulting in enhancement of the contrast compared with absorption-contrast images.
1. Introduction
Traditional X-ray imaging is based on the absorption contrast of different parts of an object. Progress in this field has been made on the improvement of detectors such as image plates, flat-panel detectors, CCD cameras etc., and developments on source and optical elements. Enhanced imaging quality has been recently achieved by exploring the real component δ of the (n = 1 − δ − iβ) instead of the imaginary component iβ that is responsible for absorption (Ingal & Beliaevskaya, 1995; Snigirev et al., 1995; Wilkins et al., 1996). Different optical arrangements and techniques, generally termed as phase-contrast radiography (PCR) or diffraction-enhanced imaging (DEI) (Chapman et al., 1997), are being used to increase the density of information carried by the X-ray beam that passes through the object and reaches the detector. For PCR, as in the case when an X-ray interferometer is used, beam coherence is the fundamental factor (Ando et al., 2001). However, angular rejection of photons scattered at small angles or deviated by refraction (Ando et al., 2001), which are described by the real component of the can be used by optical methods to increase the contrast. Projection radiography simply using a point source (Wilkins et al., 1996), X-ray holography using a coherent or partially coherent source (Tegze et al., 2000) and non-dispersive double-crystal radiography (Davis et al., 1995; Förster et al., 1980), together with X-ray interferometry (Ando & Hosoya, 1972), are some of the techniques used to obtain contrast originating from the real component of the Applications of this technique are spreading as the experiments are being intensively developed (Stevenson et al., 2003).
First experiments on DEI have begun at the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS) and are reported here. The experimental set-up will be described in detail; DEI obtained with synchrotron radiation will be shown and compared with absorption radiography of the same samples. Conclusions and perspectives will be drawn.
2. Experiment
Synchrotron light properties are very suitable for obtaining enhanced radiographic imaging (Snigirev et al., 1995; Zhong et al., 2000; Westneat et al., 2003; Stevenson et al., 2003). First experiments of DEI have been optimized at the XRD2 high-resolution X-ray diffraction beamline (Giles et al., 2003). A double-crystal Si(111) pre-monochromator, upstream of the beamline, was used to select a small energy bandwidth (Δλ/λ = 3 × 10−4) at 8 keV. A non-dispersive set-up (Ingal & Beliaevskaya, 1995) was used with an asymmetrically cut (b = −0.05) Si(333) first crystal to expand the beam and a symmetrically cut Si(333) second crystal as a Bragg analyzer (Fig. 1). The two-crystal set-up had mechanical and thermal stability assured by the use of a robust double-axis diffractometer made of one solid piece of melted iron and positioned in the vertical scattering geometry. The distance between the two axes, 200 mm, allowed convenient sample positioning. A direct-conversion water-cooled CCD camera of 1242 pixels × 1152 pixels, each 25 µm × 25 µm, positioned at 200 mm from the analyzer crystal, was used as a two-dimensional detector. With this set-up it was possible to obtain bright and dark field images by changing the angular position of the Bragg analyzer crystal by some tens of µrad around the maximum of the rocking curve. The acquisition time varied with the transmitted signal through the sample and with the angular position of the Bragg analyzer crystal, from a few seconds to several minutes per image. Images obtained with this set-up were compared with conventional absorption radiographs taken using the same samples with a conventional laboratory source.
The phase contrast becomes very useful at higher energies and very suitable for enhanced imaging of low-density objects.
3. Results
To demonstrate DEI effects, images were taken of a tree leaf at different angular positions of the Bragg analyzer crystal. Fig. 2(a) was recorded with the analyzer near the peak position showing dark contrast at the stem, indicated by the arrow. Images of the tree leaf with increasing angular distance from the peak position creates an inversion of the DEI contrast from dark to bright in the entire image and in particular at the stem indicated by the arrow (Figs. 2a–2c). A schematic rocking curve of the Si(333) analyzer crystal with the beam passing through the sample is shown in Fig. 3. The angular positions where the tree-leaf images of Fig. 2 were taken are indicated by crosses. Images far from the peak position required more integration time to account for the intensity decrease out of the analyzer peak position. The demonstrated tunability from dark to bright contrast is not possible in absorption-contrast imaging and is characteristic of the phase-contrast techniques.
DEI is also being used to improve the distinction between normal and abnormal human tissue. This may be useful in the case of the identification of microcalcifications (Arfelli et al., 2000) and surface spiculations that could be correlated with histopathologic information to detect early stages of tumor tissue and its extension into the surrounding tissue. Figs. 4 and 5 show examples of DEI with in vitro tumorous tissue. A sectional image of a formalin-fixed human uterus cancer specimen is shown in Fig. 4(a). An absorption-contrast image (Fig. 4b) and diffraction-enhanced image (Fig. 4c) of a small region containing tumorous tissue indicated by the arrow are shown for comparison. Increased contrast details present in the diffraction-enhanced image are indications of the potential application of this technique for detection of lesion details for early diagnosis and characterization of histopathologic tissue. A lung specimen with tubercular regions is shown in Fig. 5. A sectional image with arrows indicating the internal structure of a tuberculoma is shown in Fig. 5(a) and is compared with the absorption-contrast (Fig. 5b) and DEI (Fig. 5c) images. The tubercular structures are clearly visible in the DEI image compared with the absorption-contrast image.
Another example is shown in Fig. 6, in a study of tooth radiography. A 0.5 mm-thick canine sectional specimen was used for absorption-contrast imaging (Fig. 6a) and DEI (Fig. 6b). The enamel and dentine interface is clearly visible in the DEI image.
4. Conclusions and perspectives
A DEI set-up has been implemented at the high-resolution X-ray diffraction beamline XRD2 at the LNLS. First experiments using an asymmetrically cut Si(333) and a symmetrically cut Si(333) crystal as a Bragg analyzer allowed DEI of biological specimens. Bright and dark field enhanced contrast of boundaries between media of different density was shown. One possible application of DEI radiography is the advanced observation of microcalcifications in mammographic images which can be one of the first signs of breast cancer and is not straightforwardly detected by conventional X-ray imaging.
This work is part of a recently created collaborative network between our research institutions (UFRJ, UNICAMP, LNLS and UFPR). Further experiments using synchrotron radiation at higher energies as well as alternative set-ups for DEI using synchrotron radiation and conventional sources will be performed in the near future.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP contract 96/05586-6) and Programa de Apoio à Núcleos de Excelência (PRONEX).
References
Ando, M. & Hosoya, S. (1972). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on X-ray Optics and Microanalysis, edited by G. Shinoda et al., p. 63. Tokyo: University of Tokyo. Google Scholar
Ando, M., Sugiyama, H., Zhang, X., Hyodo, K., Maksimenko, A. & Pattanasiriwisawa, W. (2001). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40, L298–L301. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Arfelli, F., Bonvicini, V., Bravin, A., Cantatore, G., Castelli, E., Palma, L. D., Di Michiel, M., Fabrizioli, M., Longo, R., Menk, R. H., Olivo, A., Pani, S., Pontoni, D., Poropat, P., Prest, M., Rashevsky, A., Ratti, M., Rigon, L., Tromba, G., Vacchi, A., Vallazza, E. & Zanconati, F. (2000). Radiology, 215, 286–293. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chapman, D., Thomlinson, W., Johnston, R. E., Washburn, D., Pisano, E., Gmür, N., Zhong, Z., Menk, R., Arfelli, F. & Sayers, D. (1997). Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 2015–2025. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Davis, T. J., Gao, D., Guruyev, T. E., Stevenson, A. W. & Wilkins, S. W. (1995). Nature (London), 373, 595–598. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Förster, E., Goetz, K. & Zaumsell, P. (1980). Kryst. Tech. 15, 937–945. Google Scholar
Giles, C., Yokaichiya, F., Kycia, S. W., Sampaio, L. C., Ardiles-Saravia, D. C., Franco, M. K. K. & Neuenschwander, R. T. (2003). To be published. Google Scholar
Ingal, V. N. & Beliaevskaya, E. A. (1995). J. Phys. D, 28, 2314–2317. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Snigirev, A., Snigireva, I., Kohn, V., Kuznetsov, S. & Schelokov, I. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 5486–5492. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. W., Gureyev, T. E., Paganin, D., Wilkins, S. W., Weitkamp, T., Snigirev, A., Rau, C., Snigireva, I., Youn, H. S., Dolbnya, I. P., Yun, W., Lai, B., Garrett, R. F., Cookson, D. J., Hyodo, K. & Ando, M. (2003). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 199, 427–435. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tegze, M., Faigel, G., Marchesini, S., Belakhovsky, M. & Ulrich, O. (2000). Nature (London), 407, 38. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Westneat, M. W., Betz, O., Blob, R. W., Fezzaa, K., Cooper, W. J. & Lee, W. K. (2003). Science, 299, 558–560. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Wilkins, S. W., Gureyev, T. E., Gao, D., Pogany, A. & Stevenson, A. W. (1996). Nature (London), 384, 335–338. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Zhong, Z., Thomlinson, W., Chapman, D. & Sayers, D. (2000). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 450, 556–567. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.