laboratory notes\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775

Pulsed laser deposition chamber for in situ X-ray diffraction

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 38043 Grenoble, France
*Correspondence e-mail: graafsma@esrf.fr

(Received 27 September 2005; accepted 3 October 2005)

A sample chamber has been constructed for studying the growth of thin films by pulsed laser deposition in situ with surface X-ray diffraction. The achievable temperature ranges from room temperature to 1073 K in a controlled oxygen environment. The partial pressure of the oxygen background gas covers the range from 0.1 to 105 Pa. The first results, showing intensity oscillations in the diffracted signal during homoepitaxial deposition of SrTiO3, are presented.

1. Introduction

Pulsed laser deposition (PLD) is a very successful technique that is ever more used for the growth of thin complex oxidic films (Chrisey & Hubler, 1994[Chrisey, D. B. & Hubler, G. K. (1994). Editors. Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films. New York: Wiley.]). It makes use of a laser to ablate target material, which is deposited on a heated substrate, where a thin film is grown. Since with each laser pulse only a fraction of a monolayer is deposited, the thickness of the film can be controlled very accurately. Until recently (Eres et al., 2002[Eres, G., Tischler, J. Z., Yoon, M., Larson, B. C., Rouleau, C. M., Lowndes, D. H. & Zschack, P. (2002). Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3379-3381.]), in situ monitoring of the growing interface has been performed mainly using electron diffraction techniques, even at relatively high background pressure (Rijnders et al., 1997[Rijnders, A. J. H. M., Koster, G., Blank, D. H. A. & Rogalla, H. (1997). Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1888-1890.]). Unfortunately, quantitative analysis of the electron scattering is hampered by the fact that the kinematical description does not apply, unlike in the case of X-rays. The study of crystal growth using surface-sensitive X-ray scattering techniques is a field that has gained much interest over the past years (Renaud, 1998[Renaud, G. (1998). Surf. Sci. Rep. 32, 1-90.]; Vlieg, 2002[Vlieg, E. (2002). Surf. Sci. 500, 458-474.]). Combining the high-brilliance synchrotron X-ray beams, nowadays readily available at third-generation sources, with sample chambers, allowing for grazing-incidence geometry, opens the possibility to study the growing interface or surface on an atomic scale. Here we present the design of a chamber for studying in situ the PLD process using synchrotron X-rays.

2. Requirements and present design

Three different parameters play an important role in the PLD process: substrate temperature, oxygen background pressure and the laser fluence. In the case of growth of complex oxidic materials, like ferroelectrics and high-Tc superconductors, the substrate temperature is typically 1073 K and the oxygen background pressure is around 10 Pa. Since in some cases the oxygen content of the grown materials is not ideal at these high temperatures, the oxygen pressure in the chamber is increased to 105 Pa during cool-down to room temperature, in order to obtain the desired phase. The laser beam, having typically a wavelength of 248 nm, is focused by a lens, resulting in a fluence of approximately 1.5 J cm−2 in the focal spot on the target. In the present design, shown in Fig. 1[link], the laser enters the chamber through a fused silica window that is fixed to the aluminium chamber wall, thereby hitting the target at an angle of 45°. SXRD measurements are typically performed at a fixed angle of the order of 1° of the X-ray beam with respect to the substrate surface. Since the measurements are performed with one point detector, during deposition only one reciprocal space point is being monitored at a time. Therefore deposition is interrupted after a number of monolayers, thereby allowing for movement of the diffractometer angles and detailed measurements of the grown film. The X-rays pass through the middle aluminium part, where a cylindrically shaped strip of height 27 mm is thinned to a thickness of 0.5 mm, in order to minimize absorption. The opening angles achievable in this way are 0 to 20° for the incoming and outgoing beam with respect to the surface and 310° for rotation around the surface normal. The choice of geometry when monitoring the diffracted intensity during deposition is free, i.e. both in-plane or out-of-plane reflections can be chosen. By use of two rotary feedthroughs in the cover lid, the target spindle and shutter axes are led into the chamber. The target is rotated during deposition in order to avoid hitting the same position with each laser pulse. Prior to deposition the shutter is placed between the substrate and target in order the clean the top-most layer of the target by firing the laser a number of times without depositing material on the substrate. The heating element consists of a coil-shaped thermocoax resistor wire embedded in a Ni heater block, which is non-reactive in an oxygen environment. The substrate is attached to the heater, using Cerastil ceramic glue. At 1073 K and ambient pressure the total power used by the heater is 85 W. Under these demanding conditions the chamber was tested for thermal loss, showing that the cover lid reaches a temperature of 333 K while the other walls only heat up to 313 K.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Cross-sectional view of the sample chamber. The height from base plate to top lid is 260 mm, and the diameter of the middle part is 140 mm. 1, Feedthrough for target spindle; 2, feedthrough for pre-ablation shutter; 3, electro-motor for target spindle; 4, viewport; 5, water-cooling connections; 6, pre-ablation shutter; 7, target; 8, aluminium chamber wall; 9, laser beam; 10, thinned part of aluminium wall (0.5 mm); 11, substrate position; 12, resistive wire heater embedded in nickel heater block; 13, fused silica laser window; 14, vacuum pump connection; 15, base plate (d = 150 mm).

3. Applications

The chamber has been used in combination with an excimer laser (KrF 248 nm, Lambda Physik EMG 103) for the homoepitaxial deposition of SrTiO3. The laser beam is focused down to about 3 mm2 by a lens, resulting in a laser fluence of 2 J cm−2 on the target. X-ray diffraction experiments, using a wavelength of 0.775 Å, were performed in situ by mounting the chamber on a 2+3-type surface diffractometer (Vlieg, 1998[Vlieg, E. (1998). J. Appl. Cryst. 31, 198-203.]) on BM26 (Dubble) (Borsboom et al., 1998[Borsboom, M., Bras, W., Cerjak, I., Detollenaere, D., van Loon, D. G., Goedtkindt, P., Konijnenberg, M., Lassing, P., Levine, Y. K., Munneke, B., Oversluizen, M., van Tol, R. & Vlieg, E. (1998). J. Synchrotron Rad. 5, 518-520.]) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Fig. 2[link] shows the measured intensity oscillations of the specularly reflected beam at an angle of incidence of 1°. Each maximum in Fig. 2[link] corresponds to the completion of another monolayer of the material, and this kind of oscillation is a clear signature for layer-by-layer growth.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Intensity oscillations for the homoepitaxial deposition of SrTiO3. Clearly growth proceeds in a layer-by-layer fashion. Upon completion of a monolayer the intensity goes to a maximum. Owing to surface roughening, the intensity decreases.

4. Conclusion

A sample chamber for the purpose of studying the PLD process in situ with surface-sensitive X-ray scattering has been successfully tested and implemented at a synchrotron beamline. The very first results show that it is possible to follow the evolution of the SrTiO3(001) surface, during layer-by-layer growth up to many monolayers. This opens the possibilities to carry out detailed studies of crystal growth using PLD and to profit from the resulting quantifiable data using a kinematical description of scattering.

References

First citationBorsboom, M., Bras, W., Cerjak, I., Detollenaere, D., van Loon, D. G., Goedtkindt, P., Konijnenberg, M., Lassing, P., Levine, Y. K., Munneke, B., Oversluizen, M., van Tol, R. & Vlieg, E. (1998). J. Synchrotron Rad. 5, 518–520.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationChrisey, D. B. & Hubler, G. K. (1994). Editors. Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films. New York: Wiley.  Google Scholar
First citationEres, G., Tischler, J. Z., Yoon, M., Larson, B. C., Rouleau, C. M., Lowndes, D. H. & Zschack, P. (2002). Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3379–3381.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRenaud, G. (1998). Surf. Sci. Rep. 32, 1–90.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRijnders, A. J. H. M., Koster, G., Blank, D. H. A. & Rogalla, H. (1997). Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1888–1890.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationVlieg, E. (1998). J. Appl. Cryst. 31, 198–203.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationVlieg, E. (2002). Surf. Sci. 500, 458–474.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds