short communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775

Fast two-dimensional detection for X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy using the PILATUS detector

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, HASYLAB, 22607 Hamburg, Germany, bKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium, cSupAgro – INRA – Université Montpellier, 34060 Montpellier, France, dPaul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland, and eDECTRIS Ltd, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
*Correspondence e-mail: fabian.westermeier@desy.de

(Received 12 December 2008; accepted 17 June 2009; online 2 July 2009)

The first X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy experiments using the fast single-photon-counting detector PILATUS (Paul Scherrer Institut, Switzerland) have been performed. The short readout time of this detector permits access to intensity autocorrelation functions describing dynamics in the millisecond range that are difficult to access with charge-coupled device detectors with typical readout times of several seconds. Showing no readout noise the PILATUS detector enables measurements of samples that either display fast dynamics or possess only low scattering power with an unprecedented signal-to-noise ratio.

1. Introduction

Using partially coherent X-rays, X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy (XPCS) (Grübel & Zontone, 2004[Grübel, G. & Zontone, F. (2004). J. Alloys Comp. 362, 3-11.]) measures the temporal intensity fluctuations of a speckle pattern caused by changes in the spatial arrangement of the scatterers in the sample. However, the need to select the coherent part of the incident X-ray beam reduces the scattered intensity. It is therefore highly desirable to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and to possibly ensure the detection of every scattered photon in an XPCS experiment, which can be achieved by the use of two-dimensional area detectors.

As the detection of scattered photons has to be as fast as the dynamics investigated, the time resolution of area detectors is a limiting factor. While for point detectors a time resolution down to 50 ns has been explored by Sikharulidze et al. (2002[Sikharulidze, I., Dolbnya, I. P., Fera, A., Madsen, A., Ostrovskii, B. I. & de Jeu, W. H. (2002). Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 115503.]), for two-dimensional detectors the investigated time scales are of the order of seconds down to hundreds of milliseconds, and in the fastest case down to 2 ms (Falus et al., 2004[Falus, P., Borthwick, M. A. & Mochrie, S. G. J. (2004). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 4383-4400.]).

In recent years considerable effort has been put into the development of area detectors (Falus et al., 2004[Falus, P., Borthwick, M. A. & Mochrie, S. G. J. (2004). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 4383-4400.]; Johnson et al., 2009[Johnson, I., Sadygov, Z., Bunk, O., Menzel, A., Pfeiffer, F. & Renker, D. (2009). J. Synchroton Rad. 16, 105-109.]) such as the Medipix2 detector (Llopart et al., 2002[Llopart, X., Campbell, M., Dinapoli, R., San Segundo, D. & Pernigotti, E. (2002). IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49, 2279-2283.]) and area-detector data acquisition schemes (Lumma et al., 2000[Lumma, D., Lurio, L. B., Mochrie, S. G. J. & Sutton, M. (2000). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 3274-3289.]) suited to XPCS experiments. At the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Switzerland, a novel type of area detector has been developed: the PILATUS detector is a two-dimensional hybrid pixel array detector (Schlepütz et al., 2005[Schlepütz, C. M., Herger, R., Willmott, P. R., Patterson, B. D., Bunk, O., Brönnimann, Ch., Henrich, B., Hülsen, G. & Eikenberry, E. F. (2005). Acta Cryst. A61, 418-425.]; Broennimann et al., 2006[Broennimann, Ch., Eikenberry, E. F., Henrich, B., Horisberger, R., Huelsen, G., Pohl, E., Schmitt, B., Schulze-Briese, C., Suzuki, M., Tomizaki, T., Toyokawa, H. & Wagner, A. (2006). J. Synchrotron Rad. 13, 120-130.]) which can be operated with a frame rate of up to 300 Hz. As the PILATUS detector is a single-photon-counting detector, it offers unprecedented noise characteristics owing to the absence of dark current and readout noise, which is extremely important in an XPCS experiment, where the average number of photons per pixel per accumulation time is often smaller than unity.

2. Experimental details and results

As a model system for XPCS we used a hard-sphere silica system (volume fraction φ ≃ 0.24) suspended in polypropylene glycol with an average molecular weight of 4000 g l−1 (PPG 4000; Aldrich). The experiment was carried out at the coherent small-angle X-ray scattering beamline, cSAXS, at the Swiss Light Source, Switzerland, which is equipped with a PILATUS 2M detector consisting of 3 × 8 single modules. While the whole detector can be read out with a frame rate of 10 Hz, an increase of the frame rate can be achieved by reading out the two central modules of the detector, resulting in a maximum frame rate of 100 Hz. During the experiment we took 5000 pictures using an exposure time of 10 ms, followed by a readout time of 10 ms, thus resulting in a frame rate of 50 Hz. X-rays were monochromated to a photon energy of 8 keV, and the sample was placed 90 mm upstream of a circular pinhole aperture of diameter 12 µm. The PILATUS 2M detector was placed 7050 mm downstream of the sample.

The speckle size is given by σ = (λd)/a, where λ is the wavelength, d is the distance between sample and detector, and a is the width of the illuminated area. For this set-up the speckle size was 91 µm both in the horizontal and the vertical. The speckle contrast β can be approximated by β = 1/[1 + (P/σ2)2] where P is the pixel area and σ2 is the speckle area. As the PILATUS detector has a pixel size of 172 µm × 172 µm, the calculated contrast of this set-up is 0.07.

By summing up 5000 images (Fig. 1a[link]) and azimuthally integrating, the Q-dependent static scattering intensity is obtained. Fitting a sphere form factor to the high Q-values of the data gives a mean radius of R = 270 Å and a polydispersity of ΔR/R = 0.13. The static intensity distribution I(Q) of a concentrated sample is given by I(Q) = S(Q)P(Q). Here, S(Q) is the static structure factor and P(Q) is the particle form factor. By dividing the measured intensity values by the intensity of a dilute sample (volume fraction φ ≃ 0.01) the static structure factor is obtained as shown in Fig. 1(b)[link]. The maximum of the structure factor S(Q)max is found at Q = 0.009 Å−1 corresponding to a mean particle distance of ∼700 Å.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
(a) Sum of 5000 images. The four black circles mark the Q-values of the pixels shown in (c). (b) Static structure factor of the sample with S(Q)max at Q = 0.009 Å−1. (c) Counts per pixel per frame (10 ms of data acquisition time) shown for four arbitrarily chosen pixels at Q-values of 0.0014, 0.004, 0.009 and 0.013 Å−1 during the first 10 s of the experiment.

For the dynamic analysis of the images the pixels between Qmin = 0.0022 Å−1 and Qmax = 0.012 Å−1 have been analyzed. In Fig. 1(c)[link] the counts per pixel per frame for four different pixel positions on the detector are shown. Even at Q = 0.0014 Å−1, a position close to the direct beam, the counts are fluctuating between 0 and 5. At larger momentum transfers the count rate decreases and the most likely value is 0.

Noise-free photon detection leads to a superior SNR. The SNR in an XPCS experiment is given by an expression derived by Jakeman (1973[Jakeman, E. (1973). Photon Correlation and Light Beating Spectroscopy, edited by H. Z. Cummins and E. R. Pike, pp. 75-149. New York: Plenum.]) and adapted for area detectors by Falus et al. (2004[Falus, P., Borthwick, M. A. & Mochrie, S. G. J. (2004). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 4383-4400.]): SNR = βI(Tτa)1/2η(τaF)1/2(npix)1/2. Here η is the quantum efficiency, npix is the number of pixels per frame, β is the speckle contrast, I is the intensity per pixel, T is the total measurement time, and τa is the accumulation time per frame. F, the frame rate, is related to the delay time between consecutive pictures via F = 1/(τa + τt) where τt is the readout time of the detector. Calculating the SNR in the region used for the dynamic analysis yields a SNR of 3872. In the case of an ideally efficient (η = 1) point detector (npix = 1) showing no readout time (τt = 0) the formula reduces to SNR = βI(T/F)1/2, yielding a SNR of 19 for the same experimental parameters. The comparison between the SNR of the PILATUS detector and an ideal point detector yields a factor of ∼200 in favour of the PILATUS detector.

For the dynamics analysis the region of interest was divided into 27 equidistant constant-Q rings. All pixels inside a ring were binned to a mean Q-value. The intensity autocorrelation function was calculated for each pixel according to (Lumma et al., 2000[Lumma, D., Lurio, L. B., Mochrie, S. G. J. & Sutton, M. (2000). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 3274-3289.])

[g_{2}(k)={{(1/N)\sum\limits_{k\,=\,0}^{N-1}I(t)\,I(t+k)}\over{\left\langle\left[(1/N)\sum\limits_{k\,=\,0}^{N-1}I(t+k)\right]^{2}\right\rangle}},\eqno(1)]

where N is the total number of frames and k is the frame number. 〈…〉 denotes the azimuthal average of all pixels binned to a mean Q-value with a width five times narrower than that used for the dynamics analysis. The intensity autocorrelation functions can be fitted by g2(τ) = 1 + βexp[−2Γ(Q)τ] where β denotes the speckle contrast and Γ(Q) is the relaxation rate. The experimentally measured speckle contrast was about β = 0.07, in good agreement with the theoretical predicted value.

The dynamics becomes faster with increasing momentum transfers, as shown by the normalized intensity autocorrelation functions in Fig. 2[link]. In the absence of interparticle interactions, the particles migrate freely with the Stokes–Einstein diffusion coefficient D0. At higher colloid concentrations, interparticle interactions as well as indirect hydrodynamic interactions mediated by the solvent come into play, which can be described by the wavevector-dependent diffusion coefficient D(Q) = Γ(Q)/Q2 shown in the inset of Fig. 2[link].

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Normalized intensity autocorrelation functions g2(τ) − 1 and corresponding fits at Q-values of 0.0038, 0.0056, 0.0078 and 0.0107 Å−1. The inset shows the wavevector-dependent diffusion coefficient D(Q).

3. Conclusions

The PILATUS detector opens the possibility of investigating samples showing dynamics in the millisecond range and thus allows new types of XPCS experiments to be conducted using area detectors. Two developments can account for this achievement: first, the PILATUS detector is able to record images with a frame rate of up to 300 Hz; second, the PILATUS as a noise-free single-photon-detecting hybrid pixel array detector allows accurate measurements of images showing a relatively low scattering signal. This development is crucial for the fast recording of two-dimensional images as the intensity per image is simultaneously decreasing as the data acquisition time becomes shorter. In particular, the extremely high SNR achieved in this experiment yields intensity autocorrelation functions of high precision. Further developments of the detector are planned: a novel PILATUS detector will make it possible to record images with a frequency of up to 10 kHz. This progress in detector technology will make it possible to explore systems showing dynamics over the whole millisecond range.

References

First citationBroennimann, Ch., Eikenberry, E. F., Henrich, B., Horisberger, R., Huelsen, G., Pohl, E., Schmitt, B., Schulze-Briese, C., Suzuki, M., Tomizaki, T., Toyokawa, H. & Wagner, A. (2006). J. Synchrotron Rad. 13, 120–130.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFalus, P., Borthwick, M. A. & Mochrie, S. G. J. (2004). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 4383–4400.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationGrübel, G. & Zontone, F. (2004). J. Alloys Comp. 362, 3–11.  Google Scholar
First citationJakeman, E. (1973). Photon Correlation and Light Beating Spectroscopy, edited by H. Z. Cummins and E. R. Pike, pp. 75–149. New York: Plenum.  Google Scholar
First citationJohnson, I., Sadygov, Z., Bunk, O., Menzel, A., Pfeiffer, F. & Renker, D. (2009). J. Synchroton Rad. 16, 105–109.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLlopart, X., Campbell, M., Dinapoli, R., San Segundo, D. & Pernigotti, E. (2002). IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49, 2279–2283.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationLumma, D., Lurio, L. B., Mochrie, S. G. J. & Sutton, M. (2000). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 3274–3289.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSchlepütz, C. M., Herger, R., Willmott, P. R., Patterson, B. D., Bunk, O., Brönnimann, Ch., Henrich, B., Hülsen, G. & Eikenberry, E. F. (2005). Acta Cryst. A61, 418–425.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSikharulidze, I., Dolbnya, I. P., Fera, A., Madsen, A., Ostrovskii, B. I. & de Jeu, W. H. (2002). Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 115503.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds