Crystal structure of stable protein CutA1 from psychrotrophic bacterium Shewanella sp. SIB1
CutA1 is widely found in bacteria, plants and animals, including humans. The functions of CutA1, however, have not been well clarified. It is known that CutA1s from Pyrococcus horikoshii, Thermus thermophilus and Oryza sativa unfold at temperatures remarkably higher than the growth temperatures of the host organisms. In this work the crystal structure of CutA1 from the psychrotrophic bacterium Shewanella sp. SIB1 (SIB1–CutA1) in a trimeric form was determined at 2.7 Å resolution. This is the first crystal structure of a psychrotrophic CutA1. The overall structure of SIB1–CutA1 is similar to those of CutA1 from Homo sapiens, Escherichia coli, Pyrococcus horikoshii, Thermus thermophilus, Termotoga maritima, Oryza sativa and Rattus norvergicus. A peculiarity is observed in the β2 strand. The β2 strand is divided into two short β strands, β2a and β2b, in SIB1–CutA1. A thermal denaturation experiment revealed that SIB1–CutA1 does not unfold completely at 363 K at pH 7.0, although Shewanella sp. SIB1 cannot grow at temperatures exceeding 303 K. These results indicate that the trimeric structural motif of CutA1 is the critical factor in its unusually high stability and suggest that CutA1 needs to maintain its high stability in order to function, even in psychrotrophs.
CutA1 is universally distributed in bacteria, plants and animals. CutA1 from Homo sapiens (Hs-CutA1) appears to be necessary for the localization of acetylcholinesterase at the cell surface (Navaratnam et al., 2000; Perrier et al., 2000). Recently it has been shown that mammalian CutA1 affects the folding, oligomerization and secretion of acetylcholinesterase (Liang et al., 2009). In addition, homologues to bacterial CutA1 belong to an operon involved in copper tolerance. CutA1 from Escherichia coli (Ec-CutA1) is related to the copper-tolerance mechanism (Fong et al., 1995). The crystal structures of several CutA1s have been determined: Hs-CutA1, Ec-CutA1, CutA1s from Thermus thermophilus (Tt-CutA1), Oryza sativa (Os-CutA1), Pyrococcus horikoshii (Ph-CutA1), Rattus norvergicus (Rn-CutA1) and Termotoga maritima (Tm-CutA1) (Arnesano et al., 2003; Tanaka et al., 2004; Savchenko et al., 2004; Bagautdinov et al., 2008). The trimer structures of CutA1 are quite similar, even between mammalian and bacterial CutA1s, suggesting a functional link between them. The specific functions of CutA1, however, have not been well clarified.
It has been reported that CutA1 from a hyperthermophile, Ph-CutA1, has a denaturation temperature of almost 423 K (Tanaka et al., 2006), which is the highest temperature reported in globular proteins. Other CutA1s, such as Tt-CutA1 and Os-CutA1, also unfold at remarkably higher temperatures than the growth temperatures of the host organisms (Sawano et al., 2008). The present state of knowledge cannot explain why CutA1 has such unusually high stability. Moreover, it is not known whether CutA1 from psychrophiles and psychrotrophs, in which most proteins are unstable, is remarkably stable or not.
Shewanella sp. strain SIB1 is a psychrotrophic bacterium that grows rapidly at 293 K (Kato et al., 2001). It cannot grow at temperatures exceeding 303 K, but does grow at temperatures as low as 273 K. FKBP22 and ribonuclease HI from Shewanella sp. SIB1 exhibit enzymatic properties characteristic of cold-adapted enzymes (Suzuki et al., 2004; Ohtani et al., 2001). CutA1 from this strain (SIB1–CutA1) contains 108 amino acid residues and shares 30, 25 and 39% identity with Ec-CutA1, Ph-CutA1 and Hs-CutA1. Fig. 1 presents the amino acid sequence alignment of CutA1s from several organisms. In this work we cloned the gene encoding CutA1 from Shewanella sp. SIB1, overexpressed it in E. coli, purified the recombinant protein and crystallized it. We then determined the crystal structure of SIB1–CutA1 and measured its thermal stability. The overall structure of SIB1–CutA1 is similar to that of other CutA1s. A thermal denaturation experiment revealed that SIB1–CutA1 does not completely unfold at 363 K. Based on these results, we discuss the robustness of the CutA1 structure from the viewpoint of its structure and function.
Genomic DNA of Shewanella sp. SIB1 was prepared as previously described (Suzuki et al., 2005) and was used as a template to amplify part of the SIB1–CutA1 gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Plasmid pETCutA1 for overproduction of SIB1–CutA1 was constructed by ligating the DNA fragment, which was amplified by PCR using a cloned DNA fragment containing the SIB1–CutA1 gene as a template, into the NdeI-BamHI sites of pET25b.
E. coli BL21(DE3) was transformed with pETCutA1 and grown at 310 K. When D600 reached 0.6, 1 mM IPTG was added to the culture medium and cultivation was continued at 310 K for 4 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation, disrupted by sonication, and heat-treated at 333 K for 10 min. The supernatant was dialyzed against 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.0 and applied to the HiPrep DEAE column. The protein was eluted from the column with a linear gradient of 0 to 1.0 M NaCl. The purity was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The protein concentration was determined from UV absorption using an A280 value of 1.5 for a 0.1% solution (Goodwin & Morton, 1946).
SIB1–CutA1 was crystallized using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method with 2.0 M Na/K phosphate and 100 mM acetate at pH 4.5. The crystals belonged to space group P41212 and contained six protein molecules per asymmetric unit. X-ray diffraction data were collected at a wavelength of 1.0 Å from the beamline BL38B1 station at SPring-8. Diffraction data were processed using the HKL2000 program (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). The structure was initially solved by molecular replacement with the structure of Ec-CutA1 (Protein Data Bank code 1naq ) using the MOLREP program (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2000). Model building and refinement of the structure were completed using the REFMAC and Coot programs (Murshudov et al., 1997; Emsley & Cowtan, 2004). The statistics for data collection and refinement are summarized in Table 1. The figures were prepared using PyMol (DeLano, 2004). Coordinates and structure factors for the structure of SIB1–CutA1 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 3ahp .
‡Rwork,free = Σ||Fobs| − |Fcalc||/Σ|Fobs|, where the R-factors are calculated using the working and free reflection sets, respectively. The free reflections comprise a random 10% of the data held aside for unbiased cross-validation throughout refinement.
2.4. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and thermal denaturation
The measurements of CD spectra and thermal denaturation were made on a J-725 automatic spectropolarimeter. The mean residue ellipticity, θ, which has units of degrees cm2 dmol−1, was calculated. The thermal denaturation curves of SIB1–CutA1 were determined by measuring the change in circular dichroism at 220 nm in 0.1 mg ml−1 in 10 mM Na phosphate at pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT and 5% glycerol in a 2 mm cuvette. The heating rate was 60 K h−1. The thermal denaturation of SIB1–CutA1 in this condition was reversible up to 368 K. For CD spectra measurements the buffers were 10 mM Na phosphate at pH 7.0 or 10 mM Na acetate at pH 5.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT and 5% glycerol.
The trimeric structure of SIB1–CutA1 was refined at a resolution of 2.7 Å [Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)]. The overall structure of SIB1–CutA1 resembles that of other homologous CutA1s [Figs. 2(c) and 2(d)]. The root-mean-square deviations (r.m.s.d.) of the Cα atoms for Ec-CutA1 and Ph-CutA1 against SIB1–CutA1 are 1.00 and 1.08 Å as a monomer, and 1.11 and 1.17 Å as a trimer. The r.m.s.d. of the Cα atoms between any pair of subunits of SIB1–CutA1 are 0.50–0.58Å. Each subunit (i.e. subunit A, B or C) consists of three α helices and six β strands [Figs. 2(e) and 2(f)], although the monomers of the other CutA1s have three α helices and five β strands. The main difference is observed in the β2 strand. The β2 strand is divided into two short β strands, β2a and β2b, in SIB1–CutA1 (Fig. 2g). Hs-CutA1, Ec-CutA1, Tt-CutA1, Os-CutA1 and Rn-CutA1 have a conformational kink in the β2 strand (Fig. 2h), whereas Ph-CutA1 and Tm-CutA1 from hyperthermophiles do not exhibit any kink (Fig. 2i). This kink results from an insertion of Pro residue into the β2 strand. A Pro deletion variant of Ec-CutA1 increases the stability (K. Yutani, personal communication). In the case of SIB1–CutA1 from a psychrotrophic bacterium, Gln residue (Gln39) is inserted into the β2 strand and the β2 strand is divided into two short β strands. CutA1 from the psychrotrophic bacterium Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 (So-CutA1) also has an insertion of Ala residue in the β2 strand (GenBank entry NC_004347) (Fig. 1). These results suggest that the conformation of the β2 strand affects CutA1 thermostability because hyperthermophilic CutA1s have no kink but mesophilic CutA1s have a kink, and psychrotrophic CutA1s have two short β strands divided. It is probable that hydrogen bonds between strands affect the stability.
Another peculiarity is that the β3 strand of SIB1–CutA1 is kinked by Pro residue (Pro58). Because Gln39 (between β2a and β2b) and Pro58 (β3) interact (Fig. 2g), the kink in the β3 strand also seems to be one of the factors leading to the split of the β2 strand in SIB1–CutA1.
SIB1–CutA1 subunit A (B or C) interacts with hydrogen bonds between β2a and β2b of subunit C (A or B), between β2b and β2a of subunit B (C or A) and between β4 and β5 of subunit B (C or A), resulting in a tightly intertwined trimer (Fig. 3a). The intertwined interactions among β strands of SIB1–CutA1 seem to stabilize the trimeric structure as in other CutA1 proteins. In contrast to the β strands, three α helices are located on the outside of the trimer and cover β strands. In the subunit interfaces, highly conserved aromatic residues, Tyr45, Trp47 and Tyr81 from subunit A (B or C) and Tyr98 and Trp101 from subunit B (C or A), exist (Fig. 3b) (see §3.3 below). These residues form a hydrophobic core at the trimer interfaces. This may also contribute to the stabilization of the CutA1 structures.
Fig. 4(a) plots the thermal denaturation of SIB1–CutA1 at pH 7.0. SIB1–CutA1 starts unfolding from around 353 K. However, the unfolding is not completed even at 368 K because the CD value at 368 K and pH 7.0 differs from that at 368 K and pH 5.0 (Fig. 4b). Shewanella sp. SIB1 cannot grow at temperatures exceeding 303 K, and FKBP22 and ribonuclease HI from Shewanella sp. SIB1 are inactivated at less than 313 K (Suzuki et al., 2005; Ohtani et al., 2001). These results demonstrate the high stability of SIB1–CutA1. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis enables us to provide thermal denaturation temperatures over 373 K. Unfortunately we could not obtain the thermal denaturation curve of SIB1–CutA1 by DSC because the solution contained DTT and EDTA, which are necessary for reversible unfolding of SIB1–CutA1.
Tanaka et al. (2006) have shown that the amino acid compositions of Ph-CutA1, Tt-CutA1 and Ec-CutA1 are quite different. There are fewer neutral residues (8.8%) but more charge residues (42.2%) in Ph-CutA1 as compared with those in Tt-CutA1 (21.4% and 28.2%) and Ec-CutA1 (25.9% and 22.3%). Furthermore, the number of intra-subunit ion pairs in Ph-CutA1, Tt-CutA1 and Ec-CutA1 is 30, 12 and 1. These properties are in (inverse) proportion to their stability: Ph-CutA1 unfolds at nearly 423 K, whereas the denaturation temperatures of Tt-CutA1 and Ec-CutA1 are 385.7 K and greater than 363 K (Sawano et al., 2008). Here, the proportions of the neutral and charge residues in SIB1–CutA1 are 25.0% and 15.7%, and SIB1–CutA1 has two intra-subunit ion pairs. These results suggest that SIB1–CutA1 has a stability comparable with that of Ec-CutA1. It is noted that the denaturation temperature of Os-CutA1, which is from rice plant with an optimum growth temperature of 301 K, is close to 373 K at pH 7.0 (Sawano et al., 2008).
As described above, CutA1s have an unusually high stability that fundamentally depends on the optimal growth temperatures of their host organisms. The difference in stability is explained by the difference in electrostatic interactions and the conformation of the β2 strand. Here there is a question as to why the stability of CutA1 is so outstanding structurally and functionally.
From a structural viewpoint the high stability of CutA1 probably originates from the common trimer structural motif. The trimeric structure enables tightly intertwined interactions among the β strands. Tanaka et al. (2004) also pointed out hydrophobic interactions in Ph-CutA1 for stabilizing the trimeric structure. Furthermore, we found that the subunits in the trimer are firmly locked to each other with the highly conserved aromatic residues, such as Tyr45, Trp47, Tyr81, Tyr98 and Trp101, in SIB1–CutA1. These residues are located in the subunit interfaces. Therefore, we propose that CutA1 is stabilized by the aromatic cluster in addition to the β strands and hydrophobic interactions. We should note that some variant proteins in the highly conserved aromatic residues in So-CutA1 largely lose their stability (unpublished data). What is more, in order to clarify the protein stabilization mechanism we must consider such a structural motif in the future.
Since CutA1 unfolds at a remarkably higher temperature than the growth temperature of the host organisms and the stability depends on the growth temperature, CutA1 needs to maintain higher stability for this function. Usually, high thermostability of proteins correlates with high resistance against proteolysis. Bacterial CutA1 may have to continue capturing intracellular heavy metals without being degraded by intracellular proteases. In mammalian cells, CutA1 has been proposed to play a role in the transport of ligands to membranes (Perrier et al., 2000) and in the folding, oligomerization and secretion of acetylcholinesterase (Liang et al., 2009). In the present state we cannot explain the relation between the functions and stability of mammalian CutA1, but we believe that further investigations considering the high stability of CutA1 will be useful in obtaining critical insights into the functions of CutA1.
This work was supported in part by an Industrial Technology Research Grant Program from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan. The synchrotron radiation experiments were performed at the BL38B1, SPring-8, with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) (Proposal No. 2009B1159).
Arnesano, F., Banci, L., Benvenuti, M., Bertini, I., Calderone, V., Mangani, S. & Viezzoli, M. S. (2003). J. Biol. Chem. 278, 45999–46006. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bagautdinov, B., Matsuura, Y., Bagautdinova, S., Kunishima, N. & Yutani, K. (2008). Acta Cryst. F64, 351–357. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
DeLano, W. L. (2004). The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, California, USA. Google Scholar
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2126–2132. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fong, S. T., Camakaris, J. & Lee, B. T. (1995). Mol. Microbiol. 15, 1127–1137. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Goodwin, T. W. & Morton, R. A. (1946). Biochem. J. 40, 628–632. PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kato, T., Haruki, M., Imanaka, T., Morikawa, M. & Kanaya, S. (2001). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55, 794–800. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Liang, D., Nunes-Tavares, N., Xie, H. Q., Carvalho, S., Bon, S. & Massoulié, J. (2009). J. Biol. Chem. 284, 5195–5207. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. (1997). Acta Cryst. D53, 240–255. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Navaratnam, D. S., Fernando, F. S., Priddle, J. D., Giles, K., Clegg, S. M., Pappin, D. J., Craig, I. & Smith, A. D. (2000). J. Neurochem. 74, 2146–2153. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ohtani, N., Haruki, M., Morikawa, M. & Kanaya, S. (2001). Protein Eng. 14, 975–982. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Perrier, A. L., Cousin, X., Boschetti, N., Haas, R., Chatel, J. M., Bon, S., Roberts, W. L., Pickett, S. R., Massoulié, J., Rosenberry, T. L. & Krejci, E. (2000). J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34260–34265. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Savchenko, A., Skarina, T., Evdokimova, E., Watson, J. D., Laskowski, R., Arrowsmith, C. H., Edwards, A. M., Joachimiak, A. & Zhang, R. G. (2004). Proteins, 54, 162–165. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sawano, M., Yamamoto, H., Ogasahara, K., Kidokoro, S., Katoh, S., Ohnuma, T., Katoh, E., Yokoyama, S. & Yutani, K. (2008). Biochemistry, 47, 721–730. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Haruki, M., Takano, K., Morikawa, M. & Kanaya, S. (2004). Eur. J. Biochem. 271, 1372–1381. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Takano, K. & Kanaya, S. (2005). FEBS J. 272, 632–642. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Tanaka, T., Sawano, M., Ogasahara, K., Sakaguchi, Y., Bagautdinov, B., Katoh, E., Kuroishi, C., Shinkai, A., Yokoyama, S. & Yutani, K. (2006). FEBS Lett. 580, 4224–4230. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y., Tsumoto, K., Nakanishi, T., Yasutake, Y., Sakai, N., Yao, M., Tanaka, I. & Kumagai, I. (2004). FEBS Lett. 556, 167–174. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (2000). Acta Cryst. D56, 1622–1624. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.