view article
Figure 7
Normalized intermediate scattering functions of the SiO2 suspension versus delay time [\tau] measured at different sample-to-detector distances with (a) q = 8.180 ×10-5 Å and (b) q = 1.420 ×10-4 Å−1. (c) The best-fit decay rate [\Gamma] versus wavevector q. Points are the fitting results and the lines are guides to the eye. Data are displaced by a factor of 1.1 for clarity. (d) The best-fit exponent [\alpha] versus wavevector q. Data are displaced by a factor of 1.3 for clarity.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 18| Part 6| October 2011| Pages 823-834
doi:10.1107/S0909049511037149
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS