research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775

Mechanism for enhancing dispersion of Co3O4 nanoparticles in Co/SiO2 Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalyst by adding glycol to impregnating solution: a quick-XAFS study

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-6-07, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan, bDepartment of Engineering in Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering and Resource Science, Akita University, 1-1 Tegatagakuen-machi, Akita 010-8502, Japan, and cAkita National College of Technology, 1-1 Iijima-Bunkyo-cho, Akita 011-8511, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: nxk20@psu.edu

(Received 15 June 2011; accepted 6 October 2011; online 15 November 2011)

In situ Co K-edge quick-EXAFS (QEXAFS) coupled with temperature-programmed oxidation as well as ex situ XAFS was applied to investigating the mechanism for enhancing the dispersion of Co3O4 nanoparticles in a calcined Co/SiO2 Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalyst prepared by adding triethylene glycol (TEG) to a Co(NO3)2.6H2O impregnating solution. Ex situ Co K-edge XAFS indicated that, regardless of whether the catalysts were prepared with or without using TEG, the hexaaqua Co (II) complex was formed in impregnated samples which then underwent the dehydration process to some extent during the subsequent drying step at 393 K. In situ QEXAFS and ex situ EXAFS results also indicated that small oxide clusters were formed in the TEG-modified catalyst calcined at ∼400–470 K which interacted with polymer species derived from TEG. Since the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis activity of the TEG-modified catalyst increased with an increase in the calcination temperature in a similar temperature range [Koizumi et al. (2011[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Ibi, Y., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011a). Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138-145.]), Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138–145], it was suggested that such an interaction enables the clusters to be distributed over the support surface uniformly, resulting in enhancing their dispersion. After combustion of polymer species, Co3O4-like species were formed, and agglomeration of the Co3O4-like species at high calcination temperatures was suppressed by the addition of TEG to the impregnating solution. It was speculated that the addition of TEG induced the formation of some surface silicate which worked as an anchoring site for Co3O4 and Co0 nanoparticles during calcination and H2 reduction, respectively.

1. Introduction

Co-based catalysts are well known as typical Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) catalysts which synthesize mainly linear paraffins with a wide range of carbon numbers from CO and H2. These catalysts are usually prepared by impregnation of the aqueous solution containing Co(NO3)2.6H2O into support materials such as Al2O3, SiO2 and TiO2 followed by drying and calcination. Before the FTS, the calcined catalyst is reduced in H2 to form FTS active Co0 nanoparticles. Iglesia (1997[Iglesia, E. (1997). Appl. Catal. A, 161, 59-78.]) reported that turnover frequencies of the supported catalysts were similar and almost independent of the size of the Co0 particles when they were larger than 10 nm, which means that the rate of CO conversion normalized to the weight of Co increases with decreasing particle size in this range. Therefore, improvement of Co0 dispersion without loss of reducibility of Co is an important strategy for enhancing the FTS activity.

Many efforts have been devoted so far to developing an effective preparation method for improving the dispersion of Co0. It was demonstrated that Co0 nanoparticles with smaller sizes were formed after H2 reduction when the catalyst was prepared using Co oxalate (Kraum & Baerns, 1999[Kraum, M. & Baerns, M. (1999). Appl. Catal. A, 186, 189-200.]) and Co acetate (Sun et al., 2000[Sun, S., Tsubaki, N. & Fujimoto, K. (2000). Appl. Catal. A, 202, 121-131.]) as precursors instead of Co nitrate. Unfortunately, however, use of these precursors produced significant amounts of Co silicate-like species which were hardly reduced to metallic state under normal conditions. Therefore most of the Co remained in an oxidized state even after H2 reduction, and it suppressed the FTS activity of the catalysts greatly. In other words, trade-off relationships were reported between the dispersion of Co0 and the reducibility of Co in these studies. Several researchers pointed out the importance of a phenomenum occurring during impregnation in such precursor effects (Ming & Baker, 1995[Ming, H. & Baker, B. G. (1995). Appl. Catal. A, 123, 23-36.]; Van Steen et al., 1996[Van Steen, E., Sewell, G. S., Makhothe, R. A., Micklethwaite, C., Manstein, H., De Lange, M. & O'Conner, C. T. (1996). J. Catal. 162, 220-229.]; Trujillano et al., 2007[Trujillano, R., Villain, F., Louis, C. & Lambert, J.-F. (2007). J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 7152-7164.]), although details of its origin have not been figured out yet.

In our recent studies it was revealed that the FTS activity of Co/SiO2 was enhanced by adding a glycol such as ethylene glycol (EG), diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol (TEG) into the aqueous solution of Co(NO3)2.6H2O (Koizumi et al., 2011a[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Ibi, Y., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011a). Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138-145.],b[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011b). Catal. Lett. 141, 931-938.]). Interestingly, the addition of these glycols improved the dispersion of Co0 without loss of high reducibility of Co. Ex situ XRD and Co K-edge EXAFS analyses showed that Co3O4 nanoparticles with smaller size (∼10 nm) were formed in the calcined catalyst without forming detectable quantities of Co silicate-like species when the catalyst was prepared using TEG. Ex situ Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) also provided evidence for the formation of the interaction between Co and TEG derivatives through Co–COO bonds during calcination. Such an interaction could play a critical role in the formation of Co3O4 nanoparticles with high dispersion; however, it is still unclear yet how the glycols influence the formation process of precursor oxides to improve their dispersion.

Co K-edge XAFS is a powerful tool for investigating the speciation and coordination structures of Co formed during each preparation step for Co-based FTS catalysts because these Co species usually lack long-range order. In previous works, Co K-edge XAFS was mainly applied to the structural analysis of the calcined, reduced and used catalysts with regard to precursor effects (Khodakov et al., 1997[Khodakov, A. Y., Lynch, J., Bazin, D., Rebours, B., Zanier, N., Moisson, B. & Chaumette, P. (1997). J. Catal. 168, 16-25.]; Girardon et al., 2007[Girardon, J.-S., Quinet, E., Griboval-Constant, A., Chernavskii, P. A., Gengembre, L. & Khodakov, A. Y. (2007). J. Catal. 248, 143-157.]), support effects (Khodakov et al., 2001[Khodakov, A. Y., Griboval-Constant, A., Bechara, R. & Villain, F. (2001). J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 9805-9811.]; Morales et al., 2004[Morales, F., De Groot, F. M. F., Glatzel, P., Kleimenov, E., Bluhm, H., Ha1vecker, M., Knop-Gericke, A. & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2004). J. Phys. Chem. B, 108, 16201-16207.]; Khodakov, 2009[Khodakov, A. Y. (2009). Catal. Today, 144, 251-257.]) and promoter effects (Morales et al., 2004[Morales, F., De Groot, F. M. F., Glatzel, P., Kleimenov, E., Bluhm, H., Ha1vecker, M., Knop-Gericke, A. & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2004). J. Phys. Chem. B, 108, 16201-16207.]; Jacobs et al., 2004a[Jacobs, G., Chaney, J. A., Patterson, P. M., Das, T. K. & Davis, B. H. (2004a). Appl. Catal. A, 264, 203-212.]; Girardon et al., 2007[Girardon, J.-S., Quinet, E., Griboval-Constant, A., Chernavskii, P. A., Gengembre, L. & Khodakov, A. Y. (2007). J. Catal. 248, 143-157.]; Chu et al., 2007[Chu, W., Chernavskii, P. A., Gengembre, L., Pankina, G. A., Fongarland, P. & Khodakov, A. Y. (2007). J. Catal. 252, 215-230.]). More recently, Jacobs and his colleagues (Jacobs et al., 2007[Jacobs, G., Ji, Y., Davis, B. H., Cronauer, D., Kropf, A. J. & Marshall, C. L. (2007). Appl. Catal. A, 333, 177-191.], 2010[Jacobs, G., Ma, W., Davis, B. H., Cronauer, D., Kropf, A. J. & Marshall, C. L. (2010). Catal. Lett. 140, 106-115.]) successfully disclosed the reduction process of Co species in oxidized Co/SiO2 and Co/Al2O3 under H2 atmosphere by means of in situ quick-XAFS (QXAFS) coupled with temperature-programmed reduction, and reported how the reduction behaviour of Co was affected by the Co loading, type of support and the addition of the promoter. Furthermore, ex situ XAFS techniques provided useful insight into the deactivation mechanism of the Co-based FTS catalysts caused by, for example, co-product water (Jacobs et al., 2002[Jacobs, G., Patterson, P. M., Zhang, Y., Das, T. K., Li, J. & Davis, B. H. (2002). Appl. Catal. A, 233, 215-226.], 2003[Jacobs, G., Das, T. K., Patterson, P. M., Li, J., Sanchez, L. & Davis, B. H. (2003). Appl. Catal. A, 247, 335-343.], 2004b[Jacobs, G., Patterson, P. M., Das, T. K., Luo, M. & Davis, B. H. (2004b). Appl. Catal. A, 270, 65-76.]; Das et al., 2003[Das, T. K., Jacobs, G., Patterson, P. M., Conner, W. A., Li, J. & Davis, B. H. (2003). Fuel, 82, 805-815.]).

On the other hand, use of Co K-edge (Q)XAFS was limited for investigating the speciation of Co and their coordination structures formed during each process of impregnation, drying and calcination. Girardon et al. (2007[Girardon, J.-S., Quinet, E., Griboval-Constant, A., Chernavskii, P. A., Gengembre, L. & Khodakov, A. Y. (2007). J. Catal. 248, 143-157.]) reported XAFS spectra of impregnated and dried Ru/Re-promoted Co catalysts. In their experiments, some of their catalysts were prepared by adding sucrose to the impregnating solutions. They demonstrated that the addition of sucrose to the impregnating solutions had minor influences on the Fourier-filtered k3χ(k) of these catalysts, and suggested the importance of the subsequent calcination step in controlling the dispersion of Co0. In analogy to the studies by Jacobs et al. (2007[Jacobs, G., Ji, Y., Davis, B. H., Cronauer, D., Kropf, A. J. & Marshall, C. L. (2007). Appl. Catal. A, 333, 177-191.], 2010[Jacobs, G., Ma, W., Davis, B. H., Cronauer, D., Kropf, A. J. & Marshall, C. L. (2010). Catal. Lett. 140, 106-115.]), in situ Co K-edge QXAFS coupled with temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO) would be suitable for continuous monitoring of the changes in coordination structures caused by heating under oxidizing atmosphere, for example calcination, and provide useful information on the role of the organic additives. In spite of its potential usefulness, however, Co K-edge QXAFS of the Co-based catalysts during the calcination step have not been reported yet.

In this work, therefore, the coordination structures of Co formed in each process of catalyst preparation, namely impregnation, drying and calcination, and the effects of glycol addition to the impregnation solution on their coordination structures were investigated by ex situ and in situ Co K-edge XAFS to improve the understanding of the fundamental role of the glycols. Changes in the coordination structures of Co during the calcination step were continuously monitored by in situ QXAFS coupled with TPO, while ex situ XAFS was used for investigating the coordination structures of Co in the impregnated and dried catalysts. The mechanism for enhancing dispersion of the Co3O4 nanoparticles in the calcined catalyst is discussed based on these ex situ and in situ EXAFS data.

2. Experimental

2.1. Catalyst preparation

TEG-modified Co/SiO2 catalysts were prepared by a pore-filling incipient wetness impregnation method. SiO2 powder (BET surface area 224 m2 g−1, average pore diameter 15 nm, pore volume 1.24 ml g−1, particle size 150–250 × 10−6 m) was calcined in static air at 823 K and 12 h before use, and impregnated with an aqueous solution containing Co(NO3)2.6H2O (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, 99.5%) and TEG (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, 99.5%) followed by drying at 333 K for 2 h under flowing dry air (i.e. the first drying step). This sample was further dried at 393 K and 3 h (i.e. the second drying step) followed by calcination at 723 K for 4 h with a ramp rate of 1.0 K min−1. Both these drying and calcination steps were carried out in static air. The Co loading of the catalyst was fixed at 20 mass% (SiO2 weight basis). Since the FTS activity of the catalysts prepared using the impregnating solutions with different TEG–Co2+ molar ratios was maximized at ∼0.25 mol mol−1 (Koizumi et al., 2011a[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Ibi, Y., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011a). Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138-145.],b[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011b). Catal. Lett. 141, 931-938.]), the TEG–Co2+ molar ratios of 0.125 and 0.250 were chosen as typical values in this work. Hereafter, the catalysts thus prepared are designated as Co–TEG(X)/SiO2, where X denotes the TEG-to-Co2+ molar ratio of the impregnating solution. Co/SiO2 was also prepared using the aqueous solution containing only Co(NO3)2.6H2O.

For investigating the coordination structures of Co in the impregnated sample, the sample which experienced impregnation followed by the first drying step was used for ex situ measurement because it was not easy to prepare a homogeneous wafer from the impregnated sample which contained large amounts of water. We confirmed that Co K-edge XAFS of impregnated Co/SiO2 was similar to that of Co/SiO2 dried at 333 K (not shown here). Besides, the `dried' and `calcined' catalysts (or samples) are defined as the catalysts which underwent the impregnation and (first and second) drying steps, and the impregnation (first and second) and drying steps followed by calcination, respectively.

2.2. XAFS measurements

Co K-edge XAFS of the catalysts were measured at BL14B2 at SPring-8 synchrotron radiation facility (Harima, Japan) with a ring energy of 8 GeV in quick-XAFS mode in transmission set-up. The X-rays passed through a Si(111) double-crystal monochromator and focused onto the sample. The EXAFS data were collected in transmission mode using I0 and I ionization chambers filled with 100% N2 and 15% Ar/N2, respectively.

For ex situ measurements, the appropriate amount of the impregnated or dried samples was diluted tenfold with polyethylene glycol powder using a pestle and mortar, and then pressed into a self-supporting wafer (diameter 10 mm) at 25 MPa for 3 min. The amount of the sample was adjusted so that Δυt of the sample fell within the range 0.7–1.0. XAFS measurements were carried out under ambient temperature with 100 s dwell time. On the other hand, in situ QXAFS coupled with TPO was used to monitor the change in the coordination structures of Co during calcination. The dried catalyst was mixed with the equivalent amount of boron nitride powder, and then pressed into a self-supporting wafer (diameter 10 mm) under medium pressure (12 MPa, 2 min). The thickness of this sample wafer was below 1 mm which is indispensable for reducing the diffusion resistance of gases into the wafer. The sample wafer was placed in an in situ XAFS cell made of quartz, and then the cell was connected to a flow system equipped with mass flow controllers. The sample was heated from 373 to 623 K at a ramp rate of 1 K min−1 under flowing 20% O2/He (99.99995%, ∼100 ml min−1). XAFS spectra were acquired every 180 s. Hereafter, the XAFS spectrum measured at T means that the spectrum was accumulated during T ± 1.5 K. Tail gas from the in situ cell was analyzed simultaneously with an on-line mass spectrometer (MS) during in situ QXAFS experiments.

2.3. XAFS analysis

The observed Co K-edge XAFS were analyzed in a conventional manner including background subtraction and normalization followed by Fourier filtering using a Rigaku XAFS data analysis system (REX2000). Contributions from coordination shells in the Fourier-transformed k3χ(k) were then inverse Fourier transformed with a Hanning-type window function into k space. Structural parameters of each coordination shell were determined by a non-linear least-squares fitting in k space. The backscattering amplitude and phase shift of Co–O and Co–Co coordination shells were extracted from Fourier-transformed k3χ(k) of Co(NO3)2.6H2O and Co foil, respectively. The number of independent parameters (Nidp) (Stern, 1993[Stern, E. A. (1993). Phys. Rev. B, 48, 9825-9827.]) was also calculated in accordance with the equation

[N_{\rm{idp}}=(2\Delta{k}\Delta{R}/\pi)+2.\eqno(1)]

The quality of the fitting was evaluated by the R-factor (Rf) defined by the following equation,

[R_f\,(\%)\,=\left\{ { {\textstyle\sum\limits_i\left[k^3\chi_i^{\rm{obs}}(k)-k^3\chi_i^{\rm{cal}}(k)\right]^2 }\over{ \textstyle\sum\limits_i\left[k^3\chi_i^{\rm{obs}}(k)\right]^2 } } \right\}\times100.\eqno(2)]

Pattern-fitting analysis was also carried out for Co K-edge XANES of the catalysts to identify Co species in the catalysts. The R-factor defined by the following equation was used to evaluate the quality of the fitting,

[R_f\,(\%)\,=\left[ { {\textstyle\sum\left(I_{\rm{obs}}-I_{\rm{cal}}\right)^2 }\over{ \textstyle\sum\left(I_{\rm{obs}}\right)^2 } } \right]\times100.\eqno(3)]

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Coordination structures of Co in impregnated and dried samples

Impregnated (or dried) Co/SiO2 and Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 were used for ex situ Co K-edge XAFS. The effect of TEG on the coordination structures of Co formed in each preparation step was studied.

3.1.1. Co/SiO2

Figs. 1(A) and 1(B)[link] illustrate Co K-edge XANES and Fourier-transformed k3χ(k) (FT-EXAFS) of impregnated Co/SiO2, respectively. Since the aqueous solution of Co(NO3)2.6H2O was used as the precursor, Co K-edge XANES and FT-EXAFS of Co(NO3)2.6H2O are also included in these figures as references. In the nitrates of hexaaqua­cations such as Co(NO3)2.6H2O and Ni(NO3)2.6H2O, metal cations are surrounded by six oxygen atoms of H2O ligands in octahedral structures (Bigoli et al., 1971[Bigoli, F., Braibanti, A., Tiripicchio, A. & Camellini, M. T. (1971). Acta Cryst. B27, 1427-1434.]). Average Co—O bond distances are reported as 0.209 nm for both (NH4)2[Co(H2O)6](SO4)2 (Li & Li, 2004[Li, X.-H. & Li, Z.-G. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, i114-i115.]) and NH4[Co(H2O)6]PO4 (Bali et al., 2005[El Bali, B., Essehli, R., Capitelli, F. & Lachkar, M. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, i52-i54.]). As illustrated in Figs. 1(A) and 1(B)[link], Co K-edge XANES of Co(NO3)2.6H2O showed a characteristic white line at ∼7720 eV, and an asymmetric peak ascribed to the Co–O coordination shell was observed in the FT-EXAFS at ∼0.16 nm (phase shift not corrected). The Co—O bond distance determined by curve-fitting analysis was 0.208 nm which is in agreement with the literature value within the error of EXAFS analysis (±0.002 nm; see Table 1[link]).

Table 1
Structural parameters of the Co–O coordination shell for Co/SiO2 and Co-TEG(0.250)/SiO2 after impregnation and drying steps

CN: coordination number; R: distance; E0: inner potential; σ2: Debye–Waller factor; Nidp: number of independent parameters defined by equation (1)[link]; Rf: R-factor; accuracy: CN ±1.3, R ±0.002 nm.

Sample CN R (nm) E0 (eV) σ2 (10−5 nm2) Δk (nm−1) Nidp Rf (%)
Co/SiO2 After impregnation 6.2 0.208 1.226 4.90 32.5–140 10 0.96
After drying 5.2 0.207 −3.008 3.84 31.5–138 9 0.67
Co-TEG(0.250)/SiO2 After impregnation 5.8 0.208 0.289 4.36 32.5–141 10 1.04
After drying 5.5 0.207 −2.246 5.18 32.0–141 10 0.62
Co(NO3)2.6H2O 6.0 (fixed) 0.208 −0.733 4.76 32.5–143 10 0.66
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Ex situ Co K-edge XANES (A) and FT-EXAFS (B) of Co(NO3)2.6H2O (a), impregnated Co/SiO2 (b) and impregnated Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 (c). Pattern-fitting results for impregnated Co/SiO2 and Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 using the XANES of Co(NO3)2.6H2O are illustrated by broken lines. The fitting quality (Rf) defined by equation (3)[link] is also indicated in this figure. XAFS spectra were measured at ambient temperature.

Co K-edge XANES and FT-EXAFS of impregnated Co/SiO2 were similar to those of Co(NO3)2.6H2O. Pattern-fitting analysis showed that the XANES spectrum of this sample was fitted with the reference spectrum as illustrated by a broken line in Fig. 1(A)-(b)[link]. Furthermore, the Co–O coordination number and bond distance calculated by fitting analysis were in agreement with those for reference Co(NO3)2.6H2O (see Table 1[link]). These results indicated that the hexaaqua Co (II) complex is the predominant Co species in the impregnated sample. Similarly, the Co K-edge XANES of dried Co/SiO2 was fitted with the reference spectrum of Co(NO3)2.6H2O [Fig. 2 (A)-(b)[link]]. Although the Co–O coordination peak in the FT-EXAFS of the dried sample was less intense than that observed in the FT-EXAFS of Co(NO3)2.6H2O as displayed in Fig. 2(B)-(b)[link], curve-fitting analysis revealed that the difference in the Co–O coordination numbers for these samples was only 0.8, which was within the experimental error (±1.3). Furthermore, no apparent difference was observed in the Co—O bond distances for the dried Co/SiO2 and Co(NO3)2.6H2O. In the thermal decomposition of Co(NO3)2.6H2O, it is reported that the coordinated H2O molecules were dehydrated to form anhydrous Co(NO3)2 at ∼380 K via Co(NO3)2.4H2O (∼310 K) and Co(NO3)2.2H2O (∼340 K) (Ehrhardt et al., 2005[Ehrhardt, C., Gjikaj, M. & Brockner, W. (2005). Thermochem. Acta, 432, 36-40.]). In anhydrous Co(NO3)2, Co atoms are still surrounded by six oxygen atoms of NO3 ligands, but the Co—O bond distance extends to ∼0.211 nm (Grigorii et al., 2002[Grigorii, A. T., Konstantin, O. Z., Igor, V. M., Erhard, K. & Sergei, L. T. (2002). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 628, 269-273.]). Taking the thermal decomposition experiments reported by Ehrhardt et al. (2005[Ehrhardt, C., Gjikaj, M. & Brockner, W. (2005). Thermochem. Acta, 432, 36-40.]) into consideration, it is reasonable that dehydration of the hexaaqua Co (II) complex indeed takes place during the drying step. Presumably, H2O in ambient air would readsorb during preparation of the sample wafer or the ex situ XAFS measurement which resulted in the formation of Co(NO3)2.6H2O in the dried sample.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Ex situ Co K-edge XANES (A) and FT-EXAFS (B) of Co(NO3)2.6H2O (a), dried Co/SiO2 (b) and dried Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 (c). Pattern-fitting results for dried Co/SiO2 and Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 using the XANES of Co(NO3)2.6H2O are illustrated by broken lines. The fitting quality (Rf) defined by equation (3)[link] is also indicated in this figure. XAFS spectra were measured at ambient temperature.
3.1.2. Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2

Co K-edge XANES and FT-EXAFS of impregnated Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 are displayed in Figs. 1(A)-(c) and 1(B)-(c)[link], and those of dried Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 are depicted in Figs. 2(A)-(c) and 2(B)-(c)[link], respectively. Both the XANES and FT-EXAFS of impregnated Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 were similar to the reference spectra. As depicted by a broken line in Fig. 1(A)-(c)[link], a comparable degree of fitting accuracy to impregnated Co/SiO2 was obtained in pattern-fitting analysis for impregnated Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 using the spectrum of Co(NO3)2.6H2O. Furthermore, the k3χ(k) and FT-EXAFS of impregnated Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 were fitted with a single Co–O coordination shell as displayed in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b)[link]. The Co–O coordination number and bond distance calculated by curve-fitting analysis were similar to those for Co(NO3)2.6H2O (see also Table 1[link]). The Co K-edge XANES of dried Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 was also fitted with the reference spectrum [Fig. 2(A)-(c)[link]]. Curve-fitting analysis was then carried out on this sample using the Co–O coordination shell, and best-fitting results are displayed in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)[link]. The Co—O bond distance and coordination number were in agreement with those for Co(NO3)2.6H2O within the experimental errors as tabulated in Table 1[link]. These results suggested that the hexaaqua Co (II) complex is formed in impregnated Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 which then undergoes the dehydration process to some extent during the subsequent drying step. The addition of TEG to the aqueous solution of Co(NO3)2.6H2O caused no apparent differences in the coordination structures of Co in the impregnated and dried samples.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Best-fitting results for Co K-edge k3χ(k) and FT-EXAFS of impregnated (a, b) and dried (c, d) Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2. Curve-fitting analysis was carried out using a single Co–O coordination shell. Fitting results are represented by open squares for k3χ(k) and broken lines for FT-EXAFS.

It is unlikely that H2O ligands of the hexaaqua Co (II) complex are replaced with TEG because TEG itself is a weak ligand. On the other hand, it was reported that OH groups of TEG are oxidized at 318 K in the presence of nitric acid (Van Oijen et al., 1994[Van Oijen, A. H., Huck, N. P. M., Kruijtzer, J. A. W., Erkelens, C., Van Boom, J. H. & Liskamp, R. M. J. (1994). J. Org. Chem. 59, 2399-2408.]) to form a dicarboxylic acid. The dicarboxylic acid thus formed could be coordinated with Co through the formation of Co—COO bonds during the impregnation and drying steps like chelating agents such as nitrilotriacetic acid and trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (Mochizuki et al., 2007[Mochizuki, T., Koizumi, N., Hamabe, Y., Hara, T. & Yamada, M. (2007). J. Jpn. Petrol. Inst. 50, 262-271.]). However, ex situ Co K-edge XAFS measurements in this work revealed that the addition of TEG to the impregnating solution had little influence on the coordination structures of Co formed in each preparation step. These results are of importance because several researchers suggested that the Co precursor effect is caused by interaction of Co with the organic additives which then affects the modes of interaction between Co and surface hydroxy groups during impregnation (Ming & Baker, 1995[Ming, H. & Baker, B. G. (1995). Appl. Catal. A, 123, 23-36.]; Van Steen et al., 1996[Van Steen, E., Sewell, G. S., Makhothe, R. A., Micklethwaite, C., Manstein, H., De Lange, M. & O'Conner, C. T. (1996). J. Catal. 162, 220-229.]; Trujillano et al., 2007[Trujillano, R., Villain, F., Louis, C. & Lambert, J.-F. (2007). J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 7152-7164.]).

3.2. In situ monitoring of the coordination structure of Co during calcination

The change in coordination structures of Co during the calcination step, and how the addition of TEG to the impregnating solution affects them, were monitored by the in situ QEXAFS technique. The dried catalyst was mixed with BN powder, and placed in the in situ XAFS cell made of quartz. XAFS spectra were acquired every 180 s during heating of the catalyst under flowing 20% O2/N2. The tail gas was analyzed simultaneously with the on-line MS.

3.2.1. Co/SiO2

Fig. 4[link] illustrates the change in the Co K-edge FT-EXAFS of Co/SiO2 measured during TPO. Two temperature regions were observed in terms of the change in the FT-EXAFS spectra. At low calcination temperatures (379–418 K), only a broad peak attributed to the Co–O coordination shell of Co(NO3)2.nH2O (n < 6) was observed at ∼0.16 nm (not phase-shift corrected). The intensity of this peak was reduced with increasing calcination temperature which was accompanied by a peak shift towards a shorter bond distance. The decrease in the peak intensity indicated that hydrating water was further eliminated from Co nitrate species. It would also result from increasing thermal disorder caused by heating. On the other hand, three peaks evolved at ∼420 K followed by an increase in their intensities with the calcination temperature. These three peaks are characteristic of Co3O4, and ascribed to the Co–O, Co–Co (Oh) and Co–Co (Td) coordination shells of Co3O4 (Koizumi et al., 2009[Koizumi, N., Mochizuki, T. & Yamada, M. (2009). e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 7, 633-640.]). The emergence of these peaks indicated that the Co nitrate species was decomposed to form Co3O4-like species. Increasing intensities of these peaks also indicated that Co3O4-like species were agglomerated at calcination temperatures higher than 420 K.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Co K-edge FT-EXAFS of dried Co/SiO2 monitored by in situ QXAFS coupled with TPO. The dried sample was heated under flowing 20%O2/N2 at a ramp rate of 1 K min−1. XAFS spectra were acquired every 180 s during heating of the sample.

Since the difference in the Co—O bond distances for Co(NO3)2.6H2O (0.207 nm) and Co3O4 (0.193 nm) is approximately seven times larger than the typical error of EXAFS analysis (±0.002 nm), the Co—O bond distance can be used as indexes for investigating in detail the decomposition of Co nitrate species into Co3O4-like species. The Co—O bond distances calculated by curve-fitting analysis are plotted in Fig. 5[link] as a function of the calcination temperature. It is seen from this figure that the Co—O bond distance decreased monotonically with an increase in calcination temperature from 360 to 410 K followed by an abrupt decrease at ∼420 K. Above this temperature the bond distance slightly increased with calcination temperature, and was in agreement with that for polycrystalline Co3O4. This figure illustrates that the Co nitrate species is decomposed at ∼415 K under the conditions used in this work. This decomposition temperature is lower than that reported for thermal decomposition of Co(NO3)2.6H2O investigated by TG-DTA (∼560 K) (Ehrhardt et al., 2005[Ehrhardt, C., Gjikaj, M. & Brockner, W. (2005). Thermochem. Acta, 432, 36-40.]).

[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Change in the Co—O bond distances for Co/SiO2 (closed squares), Co-TEG(0.125)/SiO2 (open triangles) and Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 (open circles) during heat treatment in a flow of 20% O2/He. The Co—O bond distances were determined by curve-fitting analysis using Co K-edge FT-EXAFS illustrated in Figs. 4[link] and 6[link]. This figure also illustrates the change in partial pressure of CO2 monitored by on-line MS spectroscopy (m/z = 44) during the in situ experiment of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2.
3.2.2. Co-TEG(X)/SiO2

Co K-edge FT-EXAFS of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 changed in a similar way to those observed for Co/SiO2 as displayed in Fig. 6[link]. However, the addition of TEG to the impregnating solution caused three major differences between their FT-EXAFS. First, an additional temperature region was observed for the TEG-modified catalyst in terms of change in the FT-EXAFS, namely 454–476 K. In this temperature range the FT-EXAFS spectra remained almost unchanged. The second one is related to the temperature for the formation of Co3O4-like species; Co3O4-like species were formed in Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 at approximately 40 K higher temperatures than those in Co/SiO2. Finally, the intensities of the peaks characteristic of Co3O4 for Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 were no more than 50% of those observed for Co/SiO2 at the higher calcination temperatures, indicating that agglomeration of Co3O4-like species was moderated by the addition of TEG. The latter is important because in situ QXAFS experiments provide direct evidence that the addition of TEG to the impregnating solution suppressed agglomeration of Co3O4-like species during calcination.

[Figure 6]
Figure 6
Co K-edge FT-EXAFS of dried Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 monitored by in situ QXAFS coupled with TPO. The dried sample was heated under flowing 20%O2/N2 at a ramp rate of 1 K min−1. XAFS spectra were acquired every 180 s during heating of the sample.

To investigate the effect of TEG in more detail, Co-TEG(0.125)/SiO2 was also used for the in situ QXAFS experiment. The Co—O bond distances for Co-TEG(X)/SiO2 (X = 0.125, 0.25) were then calculated by curve-fitting analysis, and are plotted in Fig. 5[link] as a function of the calcination temperature. When the calcination temperatures were lower than 400 K, the Co—O bond distances for Co-TEG(X)/SiO2 decreased with an increase in the calcination temperature, similar to those for Co/SiO2. However, a gradual decrease in the Co—O bond distances for the TEG-modified catalysts was observed between 400 and 470 K, resulting in deviation of the Co—O distances from those for Co/SiO2. At higher calcination temperatures the Co—O bond distances for Co-TEG(X)/SiO2 dropped to approximately 0.193 nm, indicating the formation of Co3O4-like species.

Fig. 5[link] also displays the change in partial pressure of CO2 in the tail gas monitored by the on-line MS during the in situ QXAFS measurement of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2. An intense peak of CO2 (m/z = 44) was observed in the temperature range 473–523 K as displayed in this figure, whereas no CO2 was observed during the in situ experiment of Co/SiO2 (not shown here). Therefore, this intense peak is attributed to the combustion of carbonaceous species derived from TEG. It is seen from this figure that the formation of Co3O4-like species in Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 was accompanied by the combustion of carbonaceous species. In other words, carbonaceous species derived from TEG were preserved in the catalyst before the formation of Co3O4-like species. Taking these results into consideration, it is reasonable that some kind of interaction is formed between Co and carbonaceous species in the range 400–470 K, which caused deviation of the Co—O bond distances for Co-TEG(X)/SiO2 from those for Co/SiO2. This is consistent with ex situ FT-IR results in our previous work where the IR band of the COO ligand coordinated with Co was observed when the TEG-modified catalyst was calcined at 423 and 473 K (Koizumi et al., 2011a[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Ibi, Y., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011a). Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138-145.]).

3.3. Formation of small Co oxide clusters as a precursor for Co3O4-like species

Since in situ measurements at high temperatures would increase thermal disorder and may obscure EXAFS oscillation, the coordination structures of Co in Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at different temperatures were further investigated by ex situ Co K-edge EXAFS for deeper understanding of the role of TEG. In this experiment the dried catalyst was calcined in an electric oven at a ramp rate of 1 K min−1. Once the furnace temperature reached a desired calcination temperature, the catalyst was allowed to cool down to ambient temperature.

Fig. 7[link] illustrates Co K-edge FT-EXAFS of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at 423 and 473 K in comparison with that of dried Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2. Co oxalate [Co(C2O4).2H2O] was chosen as a reference Co compound which contains the Co—COO bonds, and used for the ex situ measurement as well. In the FT-EXAFS spectra of calcined Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2, asymmetric peaks were observed at ∼0.16 nm (phase shift not corrected). The intensities of these peaks were weaker than that observed in the FT-EXAFS of the dried sample, which is consistent with the in situ QEXAFS results mentioned in §3.2.2[link]. Besides these peaks, weak peaks were observed at ∼0.27 nm (phase shift not corrected) in the FT-EXAFS of the calcined samples. They were never observed in the spectrum of the dried one, and did not match even with the Co–C coordination peak observed in the FT-EXAFS of Co oxalate. On the other hand, these new peaks are similar to the Co–Co coordination peaks of Co3O4-like species observed during the in situ QEXAFS experiments at high calcination temperatures. Then Co K-edge EXAFS of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at different temperatures were fitted with two coordination shells, namely Co–O and Co–Co coordination shells. Best-fitting results are displayed in Fig. 8[link]. As can be seen from this figure, both the k3χ(k) and FT-EXAFS of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 were fitted well with these coordination shells. This indicates that Co nitrate species are decomposed to form Co oxide species in the TEG-modified catalysts calcined at 423–473 K. Optimized structural parameters for the C–O and Co–Co coordination shells are summarized in Table 2[link]. The Co–Co distances were apparently longer than that for polycrystalline CoO (0.302 nm) (Khodakov et al., 1997[Khodakov, A. Y., Lynch, J., Bazin, D., Rebours, B., Zanier, N., Moisson, B. & Chaumette, P. (1997). J. Catal. 168, 16-25.]), but similar to that of the Co–Co (Td) coordination shell of polycrystalline Co3O4 (0.335 nm) (Khodakov et al., 1997[Khodakov, A. Y., Lynch, J., Bazin, D., Rebours, B., Zanier, N., Moisson, B. & Chaumette, P. (1997). J. Catal. 168, 16-25.]; Koizumi et al., 2009[Koizumi, N., Mochizuki, T. & Yamada, M. (2009). e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 7, 633-640.]). Conversely, the Co–Co coordination numbers for these catalysts were smaller than that of the Co–Co (Td) coordination shell of polycrystalline Co3O4 (2–3 versus 8). The small Co–Co coordination number for these samples suggested that small Co oxide clusters are formed during calcination in the range 400–473 K, although the accurate size of these oxide clusters is not clear because of relatively large errors in the Co–Co coordination numbers.

Table 2
Fitting results for Co K-edge k3χ(k) spectra of Co(20)-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at different temperatures (T)

CN: coordination number; R: distance; E0: inner potential; σ2: Debye–Waller factor; Nidp: number of independent parameters defined by equation (1)[link]; Rf: R-factor; accuracy: CN(Co–O) ±1.3, CN(Co–Co) ±2.0, R(Co–O) ±0.002 nm, R(Co–Co) ±0.005 nm.

T Scattering pair CN R (nm) E0 (eV) σ2 (10−5 nm2) Δk (nm−1) Nidp Rf (%)
423 K Co–O 5.2 0.207 0.114 4.76 32.0–138 18 1.18
  Co–Co 1.6 0.316 −4.821 6.40      
473 K Co–O 5.2 0.206 −1.574 6.08 33.0–140 18 0.70
  Co–Co 3.1 0.318 −3.100 9.80      
[Figure 7]
Figure 7
Ex situ Co K-edge FT-EXAFS of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at different temperatures in comparison with that of Co(C2O4).2H2O as a reference Co compound which has a Co—COO bond. XAFS spectra were measured at ambient temperature; dried Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 (a), Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at 423 K (b), Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at 473 K (c) and Co(C2O4).2H2O (d).
[Figure 8]
Figure 8
Best-fitting results for Co K-edge k3χ(k) and FT-EXAFS of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at 423 K (a, b) and 473 K (c, d), indicating the formation of small oxide clusters in the calcined samples. Curve-fitting analysis was carried out using the Co–O and Co–Co coordination shells. Fitting results are represented by open squares for k3χ(k) and broken lines for FT-EXAFS.

3.4. Role of TEG in enhancing dispersion of Co3O4 nanoparticles

Glycols such as EG are known as critical reagents for preparation of fine metal particles and uniform mixed oxides in the polyol process (Blin et al., 1989[Blin, B., Fievet, F., Beaupere, D. & Figlarz, M. (1989). Nouv. J. Chim. 13, 67-72.]) and polymerizable complex method (Kakihana et al., 1993[Kakihana, M., Yashima, M., Yoshimura, M., Mazaki, H. & Yasuoka, H. (1993). J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall. 40, 137-145.]; Kakihana, 1996[Kakihana, M. (1996). J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 6, 7-55.]), respectively. In the polymerizable complex method, ester polymerization takes place between glycols and carboxylic acid such as citric acid. The polymer species thus formed consists of a three-dimensional carbon network, in which the metal complex is immobilized to form the polymer complex (Kakihana et al., 1993[Kakihana, M., Yashima, M., Yoshimura, M., Mazaki, H. & Yasuoka, H. (1993). J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall. 40, 137-145.]; Kakihana, 1996[Kakihana, M. (1996). J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 6, 7-55.]).

In analogy to the polymerizable complex method, it is reasonable that TEG and dicarboxylic acid formed by the oxidation of TEG polymerize to form a three-dimensional carbon network before the formation of Co3O4-like species. In other words, the intense peak of CO2 observed during the in situ QEXAFS measurement of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 would be caused by the combustion of such a polymer species. Since the amount of TEG in Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 was almost comparable with that required for monolayer coverage of the SiO2 surface as reported previously (Koizumi et al., 2011a[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Ibi, Y., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011a). Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138-145.]), these polymer species can spread over the support surface uniformly. On the other hand, the in situ QEXAFS and ex situ EXAFS results described in §3.2[link] and §3.3[link] indicated that the small Co oxide clusters, hereafter simply denoted as CoxOy, were formed in Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at ∼400–473 K which interacted with these polymer species through coordination with their COO ligands. In this regard it is highlighted that the FTS activity, CO conversion, of Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 was dependent upon the calcination temperature, and increased with an increase of the calcination temperature in the range 423–523 K (Koizumi et al., 2011a[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Ibi, Y., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011a). Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138-145.]), which also indicated that dispersion of Co increased in this temperature range when the catalyst is prepared using TEG. Combining these results, it is suggested that the CoxOy–polymer interaction during calcination enables the clusters to be distributed over the support surface, resulting in enhancing their dispersion during calcination. This explanation in turn suggests that such a dispersion enhancement effect does not work effectively at low TEG–Co2+ molar ratios owing to insufficient coverage of the support surface with polymer species. This could explain why there is an optimum TEG–Co2+ molar ratio for the FTS activity of the TEG-modified catalyst reported previously (Koizumi et al., 2011a[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Ibi, Y., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011a). Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138-145.],b[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011b). Catal. Lett. 141, 931-938.]).

The formation of the CoxOy–polymer interaction indicated in this work also provides important insight into the optimum TEG–Co2+ molar ratio for Co-TEG(X)/SiO2. In our previous work the FTS activity of the catalysts prepared using the impregnating solution with different TEG–Co2+ molar ratios was investigated at 503 K and 1.1 MPa using a fixed-bed reactor system, and maximized at ∼0.25 (Koizumi et al., 2011a[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Ibi, Y., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011a). Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138-145.],b[Koizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011b). Catal. Lett. 141, 931-938.]). At this molar ratio the amount of Co was fourfold larger than that of TEG. This means that only part of the Co atoms can be involved in the complex formation, assuming the formation of the (1:1) complex, even if all the OH groups of TEG are oxidized to COOH groups. This is in marked contrast with the fact that an excess amount of carboxylic acid is used in the polymerizable complex method. Since the carbon number of TEG is 6, the carbon–cobalt atomic ratio is 1.5 at the optimum TEG–Co2+ molar ratio. Under such a low atomic ratio it is difficult to immobilize Co atoms in a three-dimensional carbon network as suggested for the polymerizable complex method. On the other hand, the ex situ Co K-edge EXAFS measurements of calcined Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 indicated that small precursor oxide clusters were preserved in the carbon network before the formation of Co3O4-like species. Assuming that these precursor oxides have a structure similar to the minimum structure fragment of Co3O4, namely the unit cell (see Fig. 9[link]), the Co–Co (Td) and Co–Co (Oh) coordination numbers are calculated to be 3.1 and 3.3, respectively. These coordination numbers are similar to those observed experimentally for calcined Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 as mentioned in §3.3[link]. Since this model structure consists of 34 Co atoms, the carbon–CoxOy molar ratio is about 50 at the optimum TEG–Co2+ molar ratio which enables uniform distribution of CoxOy in the carbon network.

[Figure 9]
Figure 9
Structural model for small oxide clusters observed in Co-TEG(0.25)/SiO2 calcined at 423 and 473 K. This structural model is created based on the Co3O4 unit cell structure, and consists of 34 Co atoms.

The QEXAFS experiments in this work also revealed that Co3O4-like species were formed after combustion of polymer species, and that agglomeration of these oxide species was retarded by the addition of TEG to the impregnating solution. Since polymer species are already removed from the catalyst surface by combustion in this calcination temperature range, a different mechanism should be involved in the retarded agglomeration of Co3O4-like species. In this regard it is worth noting that the formation of surface silicate is facilitated by the use of an organic Co precursor (Girardon et al., 2005[Girardon, J.-S., Lermotov, A. S., Gengembre, L., Chernavskii, P. A., Griboval-Constant, A. & Kohdakov, A. Y. (2005). J. Catal. 230, 339-352.]) and/or addition of organic ligands (Trujillano et al., 2007[Trujillano, R., Villain, F., Louis, C. & Lambert, J.-F. (2007). J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 7152-7164.], 2008[Trujillano, R., Lambert, J.-F. & Louis, C. (2008). J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 18551-18558.]). It is also noted that our QEXAFS results do not rule out the formation of such silicate-like species other than CoxOy and Co3O4-like species. Therefore, it is speculated that the addition of TEG induced the formation of some surface silicate species which would work as anchoring sites for Co3O4 and Co0 species during calcination and H2 reduction, respectively (Lim et al., 2007[Lim, S., Wang, C., Yang, Y., Ciuparu, D., Pfefferle, L. & Haller, G. L. (2007). Catal. Today, 123, 122-132.]). In other words, TEG has two different functions of controlling speciation and coordination environments of Co, leading to the formation of Co3O4 species with high dispersion in the calcined catalyst.

4. Conclusion

In situ Co K-edge QXAFS coupled with TPO as well as ex situ XAFS was applied to investigating coordination structures of Co formed in each preparation step of Co/SiO2 and Co-TEG/SiO2 for understanding the mechanism for enhancing dispersion of Co3O4 nanoparticles caused by the addition of TEG to the impregnating solution. The change in coordination structures of Co during calcination was continuously monitored by in situ QEXAFS coupled with TPO, while ex situ XAFS was used for investigating coordination structures of Co in the impregnated and dried catalysts. The following are the important results obtained in this work.

(i) The coordination structure of Co formed in impregnated Co/SiO2 was similar to that of the hexaaqua Co (II) complex which then underwent the dehydration process to some extent during the subsequent drying step at 393 K. The addition of TEG to this impregnating solution caused no apparent differences in these coordination structures.

(ii) During calcination, the Co nitrate species in Co/SiO2 was dehydrated, and then decomposed to form Co3O4-like species at about 415 K followed by their agglomeration at high temperatures.

(iii) In situ QEXAFS and ex situ EXAFS results indicated that small oxide clusters were formed in the TEG-modified catalyst calcined at ∼400–470 K which interacted with polymer species derived from TEG. Taking our previous result into consideration, it was suggested that such an interaction enables the clusters to be distributed over the support surface uniformly, resulting in an enhancement of their dispersion during calcination.

(iv) In situ QEXAFS results also revealed that Co3O4-like species were formed after combustion of polymer species, and that agglomeration of the Co3O4-like species at high temperatures was suppressed by the addition of TEG to the impregnating solution. It was speculated that the addition of TEG induced the formation of some surface silicate species which worked as anchoring sites for Co3O4 and Co0 species during calcination and H2 reduction, respectively.

Footnotes

Present address: Earth and Mineral Sciences Energy Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, C-211 Coal Utilization Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S), 17106011, 2005. EXAFS measurement was performed at BL14B2 at SPring-8 with the approval of JASRI (proposal No. 2009B1835). We gratefully thank the staff of SPring-8 for their technical support and their kind help.

References

First citationBigoli, F., Braibanti, A., Tiripicchio, A. & Camellini, M. T. (1971). Acta Cryst. B27, 1427–1434.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBlin, B., Fievet, F., Beaupere, D. & Figlarz, M. (1989). Nouv. J. Chim. 13, 67–72.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationChu, W., Chernavskii, P. A., Gengembre, L., Pankina, G. A., Fongarland, P. & Khodakov, A. Y. (2007). J. Catal. 252, 215–230.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDas, T. K., Jacobs, G., Patterson, P. M., Conner, W. A., Li, J. & Davis, B. H. (2003). Fuel, 82, 805–815.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationEhrhardt, C., Gjikaj, M. & Brockner, W. (2005). Thermochem. Acta, 432, 36–40.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationEl Bali, B., Essehli, R., Capitelli, F. & Lachkar, M. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, i52–i54.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGirardon, J.-S., Lermotov, A. S., Gengembre, L., Chernavskii, P. A., Griboval-Constant, A. & Kohdakov, A. Y. (2005). J. Catal. 230, 339–352.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationGirardon, J.-S., Quinet, E., Griboval-Constant, A., Chernavskii, P. A., Gengembre, L. & Khodakov, A. Y. (2007). J. Catal. 248, 143–157.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationGrigorii, A. T., Konstantin, O. Z., Igor, V. M., Erhard, K. & Sergei, L. T. (2002). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 628, 269–273.  Google Scholar
First citationIglesia, E. (1997). Appl. Catal. A, 161, 59–78.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationJacobs, G., Chaney, J. A., Patterson, P. M., Das, T. K. & Davis, B. H. (2004a). Appl. Catal. A, 264, 203–212.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationJacobs, G., Das, T. K., Patterson, P. M., Li, J., Sanchez, L. & Davis, B. H. (2003). Appl. Catal. A, 247, 335–343.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationJacobs, G., Ji, Y., Davis, B. H., Cronauer, D., Kropf, A. J. & Marshall, C. L. (2007). Appl. Catal. A, 333, 177–191.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationJacobs, G., Ma, W., Davis, B. H., Cronauer, D., Kropf, A. J. & Marshall, C. L. (2010). Catal. Lett. 140, 106–115.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationJacobs, G., Patterson, P. M., Das, T. K., Luo, M. & Davis, B. H. (2004b). Appl. Catal. A, 270, 65–76.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationJacobs, G., Patterson, P. M., Zhang, Y., Das, T. K., Li, J. & Davis, B. H. (2002). Appl. Catal. A, 233, 215–226.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKakihana, M. (1996). J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 6, 7–55.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationKakihana, M., Yashima, M., Yoshimura, M., Mazaki, H. & Yasuoka, H. (1993). J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall. 40, 137–145.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKhodakov, A. Y. (2009). Catal. Today, 144, 251–257.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKhodakov, A. Y., Griboval-Constant, A., Bechara, R. & Villain, F. (2001). J. Phys. Chem. B, 105, 9805–9811.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKhodakov, A. Y., Lynch, J., Bazin, D., Rebours, B., Zanier, N., Moisson, B. & Chaumette, P. (1997). J. Catal. 168, 16–25.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationKoizumi, N., Mochizuki, T. & Yamada, M. (2009). e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 7, 633–640.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKoizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Ibi, Y., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011a). Appl. Catal. A, 395, 138–145.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKoizumi, N., Suzuki, S., Niiyama, S., Shindo, T. & Yamada, M. (2011b). Catal. Lett. 141, 931–938.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKraum, M. & Baerns, M. (1999). Appl. Catal. A, 186, 189–200.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLi, X.-H. & Li, Z.-G. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, i114–i115.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationLim, S., Wang, C., Yang, Y., Ciuparu, D., Pfefferle, L. & Haller, G. L. (2007). Catal. Today, 123, 122–132.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMing, H. & Baker, B. G. (1995). Appl. Catal. A, 123, 23–36.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMochizuki, T., Koizumi, N., Hamabe, Y., Hara, T. & Yamada, M. (2007). J. Jpn. Petrol. Inst. 50, 262–271.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMorales, F., De Groot, F. M. F., Glatzel, P., Kleimenov, E., Bluhm, H., Ha1vecker, M., Knop-Gericke, A. & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2004). J. Phys. Chem. B, 108, 16201–16207.  Google Scholar
First citationStern, E. A. (1993). Phys. Rev. B, 48, 9825–9827.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSun, S., Tsubaki, N. & Fujimoto, K. (2000). Appl. Catal. A, 202, 121–131.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationTrujillano, R., Lambert, J.-F. & Louis, C. (2008). J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 18551–18558.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationTrujillano, R., Villain, F., Louis, C. & Lambert, J.-F. (2007). J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 7152–7164.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationVan Oijen, A. H., Huck, N. P. M., Kruijtzer, J. A. W., Erkelens, C., Van Boom, J. H. & Liskamp, R. M. J. (1994). J. Org. Chem. 59, 2399–2408.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationVan Steen, E., Sewell, G. S., Makhothe, R. A., Micklethwaite, C., Manstein, H., De Lange, M. & O'Conner, C. T. (1996). J. Catal. 162, 220–229.  CAS Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds