|
|
|
Figure 5
Measured rate response obtained from 180 ns bunched fill with both bunched spacing and shaping time as free parameters. Comparison with Fig. 2 indicates a substantial improvement in goodness of fit. The model of equation (7) was preferred for shaping times 1, 3 and 4 while the model of equation (6) was preferred for shaping times 2, 5, 6 and 7. |


journal menu![[Figure 5]](wa5022fig5.jpg)
![[link]](../../../../../../logos/arrows/s_arr.gif)



