research papers
spectroelectrochemistry: reliable measurement of X-ray absorption spectra from redox manipulated solutions at room temperature
aSchool of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia, bSchool of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia, and cAustralian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
*Correspondence e-mail: spbest@unimelb.edu.au
The design and operation of a low-volume spectroelectrochemical cell for −1). The performance of the cell in terms of control of the redox state of the sample and minimization of the effects of was demonstrated by measurements of aqueous solutions of the photosensitive FeIII species, [Fe(C2O4)3]3−, together with that of the electrogenerated [Fe(C2O4)3]4− product. The current response from the cell during the collection of spectra provides an independent measure of the stability of the sample of the measurement. The suitability of the approach for the study of small volumes of mM concentrations of protein samples was demonstrated by the measurement of the oxidized and electrochemically reduced forms of cytochrome c.
of solutions at room temperature is described. Fluorescence measurements are obtained from samples contained in the void space of a 50 µL reticulated vitreous carbon (sponge) Both rapid electrosynthesis and control of the effects of are achieved by control over the flow properties of the solution through the where a good balance between the rate of consumption of sample and the minimization of decomposition was obtained by pulsing the flow of the solution by 1–2 µL with duty cycle of ∼3 s while maintaining a small net flow rate (26–100 µL hKeywords: XAS; XANES; spectroelectrochemistry; metalloproteins; trioxalatoferrate(III).
1. Introduction
Spectroelectrochemical (SEC) techniques have been shown to offer significant benefits for the study of redox active molecules (Kaim & Klein, 2008; Bond & Scholz, 2010). The main value obtained from this strategy comes from the ability to exert a high level of control over the redox form of the sample under spectroscopic investigation. The art of the approach comes from balancing the different advantages and disadvantages presented by the electrochemical and spectroscopic techniques. Similar considerations lie behind the development of operando spectroscopy as is increasingly important in the study of catalysis (Wachs, 2003; Weckhuysen, 2003) and batteries (Nakanishi et al., 2014; Permien et al., 2016). It is important to make a distinction between approaches that utilize electrosynthetic methods to generate a sample [that can then be measured ex situ with X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)] and those that employ in situ spectroscopic interrogation of electrochemically generated compounds. In the former case the state of the electrogenerated sample can be validated by independent spectroscopic methods; however, the sample must be maintained in its electrogenerated state for the duration of the measurement. The collection of of sufficient quality for structural analysis presents significant challenges both in terms of the rate of data collection and the additional complications caused by It has been shown that the linking of electrosynthesis and cryogenic stabilization of the electrogenerated product can allow the measurement of good quality data from reactive redox generated species (Bondin et al., 2001, 2006a,b; Best & Cheah, 2010; Cheah & Best, 2011).
Several approaches have been reported that allow in situ measurements from samples in controlled redox states and these use methodologies that range from bulk electrosynthesis cells (typically of volume 1–10 ml) with large-surface-area electrodes (Dewald et al., 1986; Bae et al., 2001; Levina et al., 2004; Hennig et al., 2005; Milsmann et al., 2006; Takao et al., 2010) to channel-flow cells (Wiltshire et al., 2009) and cells optimized for the study of electrode transformations (McBreen et al., 1987; Nakanishi et al., 2014). While bulk electrosynthesis cells have been used to obtain spectra, the long electrosynthesis period (typically >10 min) makes them impracticable for the study of short-lived reactive species, or for samples, such as metalloproteins, that are only available in small quantities. The channel-flow cell of Wiltshire and co-workers presents a narrow (∼1 mm2) and a flow rate of 200 µL h−1 would correspond to a residence time of the sample of ∼1s in a 50 µm focused beam (Wiltshire et al., 2009). However, the suitability of this approach is limited by the comparatively small extent of electrosynthesis able to be obtained under working conditions (5% conversion when using a 400 µm-wide ribbon electrode).
In order to deal with the issues related to reactive compounds and/or those that are only available in small quantities, approaches have been developed that allow electrosynthesis in a cell of dimensions able to be transferred to a cryostat (Yeo et al., 2012). In this case the (WE) also functions as the sample holder and the electrosynthesized sample is frozen in the WE and the cell transferred to the beamline cryostat. Using this approach the minimum sample volume is of the order of 200 µL. While this represents a significant advance, there are issues associated with the perturbation of the sample as a consequence of cooling to cryogenic temperatures. For transition metals in biological and abiological environments the local structure about the metal can be perturbed directly, through temperature-dependent changes in spin state (Nakamura & Takahashi, 2013; Day et al., 1967; Harris & Loew, 1993; Nihei et al., 2007; Craig et al., 2014; Guionneau, 2014; Beattie, 1988), or indirectly, through changes in protein conformation resulting from the temperature-dependence of the pKa of the amino acid sidechains (Alonso et al., 1991; Hutchens & Yip, 1991; Osheroff et al., 1980). Spin equilibria is often encountered in systems, such as heme proteins, where this can also be related to exchange of the coordinating ligands; for example, the met FeIII forms of heme proteins are often in spin equilibrium at biologically relevant temperatures, with the high-spin aqua form highly favoured, but the determined structures at 10 K show low-spin FeIII with bis-his coordination (Levina et al., 2005). Further, the spin state of the metal can be changed as a result of protein–protein interactions such as the high- to low-spin state change associated with α-hemoglobin specific binding protein (AHSP) binding to α-hemoglobin (Feng et al., 2004; Dickson et al., 2013). Therefore, techniques are desirable that will enable the capture of the structures of physiogically relevant spin-states of proteins and to study their interconversions with potential physiological partners.
Even in cases where the structures of metalloproteins under physiological conditions are maintained at low temperatures, et al., 2012; Levina et al., 2005, 2014, 2015). This is a conundrum because the high-flux beamlines are required to obtain high-quality from dilute solutions of metalloproteins. The issue of is particularly problematic for static solution samples since diffusion allows chemical reactions between the primary photoproducts (usually solvent) and the solute species. Thus, it is important to develop methodologies that take advantage of the high signal-to-noise ratios for measurements made achievable by high-flux beamlines, whilst also mitigating the effects of At the extreme of very high intensity free-electron laser beamlines, jet techniques have been developed to allow XRD measurements in a single X-ray pulse (Johansson et al., 2012; Chapman et al., 2011) but this comes at a cost of sample; the strategy we propose is to obtain measurements from a flowing solution, where control of the flow can both minimize and limit the sample requirements for collection of with quality suitable for structural analysis.
at modern high-flux beamlines can be so significant that it is still not possible to obtain reliable structures from samples held at 10 K (GeorgeIn this contribution we describe the design of a low-volume SEC cell for in situ where the sample under spectroscopic investigation is in close contact with the WE of the electrochemical cell. Key requirements of the approach are: (i) the redox state of the sample under irradiation is controlled electrochemically; (ii) the volume of sample needed for the collection of high-quality spectra is of the order 100–200 µL; and (iii) the sample degradation by the X-ray beam can be controlled. The successful operation of the cell is demonstrated by the quality of the spectra collected from solutions of K3[Fe(ox)3], together with that of its electrochemically reduced partner, [Fe(ox)3]4−. The suitability of the approach for the study of metalloproteins is demonstrated by measurement of the oxidized and reduced forms of cytochrome c (cyt c) that we have studied previously at 10 K (Cheng et al., 1999).
2. Experimental
2.1. Chemicals and materials
Unless otherwise stated, chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and were used without further purification. Horse heart cyt c was obtained from Sigma (>95%, cat. No. C2506) and was used without further purification. Samples of K3[Fe(ox)3] were prepared by standard methods (Malati, 1999).
Electrochemical measurements were conducted in the purpose-built cell described in the following section. The cell incorporated a Cypress systems EE009 no leak Ag/AgCl 3[Fe(ox)3] (5.0 mM) were prepared using MilliQ water with K2SO4 (0.2 M) as the and solutions of cyt c (5.0 mM) contained 10 mM 4,4′-bipyridine to mediate in the phosphate-buffered saline (20 mM phosphate, 140 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) (Eddowes & Hill, 1979). All solutions were degassed prior to loading into the gas-tight syringes.
(RE) and the WE and counter electrodes (CE) were constructed from reticulated vitreous carbon (500 p.p.i.; Destech Corporation), which had been treated by immersion in concentrated sulfuric acid and thoroughly rinsed with MilliQ water so as to render the surface hydrophilic. Solutions of K2.2. Cell design and operation
Vertical and horizontal sections through the WE compartment of the XAS-SEC cell are shown in Fig. 1. The cell body was constructed from KelF or glass-filled Teflon with cavities to accommodate the 2 mm × 2 mm × 12 mm WE, the 6 mm-diameter CE and a 2 mm hole for insertion of the RE. The space between the electrodes was packed with glass beads (45–60 mesh; Selby) of a diameter sufficiently large to be excluded from the cavities of the reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) electrodes. The purpose of the glass beads is to minimize mixing between the solution in the and the fittings were used to seal the 1/16-inch outer-diameter Teflon tubing into the cell. The WE and CE were cut from a sheet of RVC and both electrodes were carefully placed in their respective positions in the XAS-SEC cell and electrical contact was achieved through mechanical contact with platinum wires sealed into the cell body. An O-ring seal ensured an air-tight seal between the RE and the cell body. A Kapton sheet clamped against the cell block encloses the WE chamber while minimizing the absorption of X-rays. Redox reaction between the dye in the Kapton film and the redox-generated molecules has been observed when conducting reductions using non-aqueous solutions; this issue can be avoided by the use of Teflon-coated Kapton.
During cell operation, exclusion of air was achieved by introduction of the solvent/supporting electrolyte through the CE filling port without the RE sealed in the cell. Atmospheric contamination can be minimized by maintaining a flow of N2 through the WE inlet and outlet ports. Once the level of the solution was visible in the RE cavity, the flow of solution and gas was stopped and the RE was fixed in place and the solution flow through the CE was restored with the solution drained through the WE inlet and outlet ports. At this point the electrochemical performance of the cell was checked by monitoring the changes in background current with a change of applied potential.
Finally, the flow of solvent/supporting electrolyte was stopped and the inlet and outlet ports of the WE were then connected to their respective matched syringe pumps. At this point the cell was a closed system and the inlet and outlet syringes must be driven synchronously so as to achieve a flow of solution through the cell while minimizing any pressure change. The volume of solution needed to transfer the solution front from the syringe through to the exit of the sample chamber depended on the inner diameter and length of the Teflon tubing. For the experiments described below, 0.02-inch inner diameter Teflon tubing with flange seals were used and ∼95 µL was required to transfer the solution from the syringe through the Hamilton HV valve to the entry point of the cell. This could be reduced to ∼26 µL by the use of 0.01-inch inner diameter Teflon tubing (Fig. 1).
The flow of solution through the XAS-SEC cell was achieved using a reciprocating pair of syringes driven by the same pulse train but having their direction of travel reversed. In order to maximize contact of the solution with the WE and to minimize the net consumption of the sample a pulsed flow pattern was applied during electrochemical reactions and throughout the collection of , where this involves the forward flow of solution corresponding to 41 stepper motor (SM) pulses followed by the backflow of solution by 40 SM pulses to complete the cycle. For each change in direction there is a deceleration and acceleration programmed so as to minimize the mechanical stress on the SM. For the 1 ml syringe and SM/lead screw combination pump used for the experiment, 24 stepper motor pulses were required to displace 1 µL of solution; consequently a net flow of 1 SM pulse per cycle corresponds to a net solution flow of 26 µL h−1. The net flow depends on the number of back steps, the differential between the number of forward and back steps, slew rate and the acceleration/deceleration ramp, where each is able to be adjusted so as to minimize the effects of both and disturbance of the solution.
spectra. An example of a 41:40 pulse pattern is shown in Fig. 22.3. Beamline and equipment
2.3.1. Equipment
Teflon tubing and fittings (Alltech) were used in conjunction with Hamilton HV valves and Hamilton gas-tight syringes to enable solution flow to the XAS-SEC cell. The stepper motor syringes were built in the workshop of the University of Melbourne and controlled using CNC CAT TB6560 stepper motor driver board interfaced to the printer port of a PC. In-house programs were developed for controlling the stepper motors.
A PAR model 363 potentiostat was controlled using either an eDAQ e-corder 207 interface and Chart (AD Instruments) software or a NI interface (BNC-2090A) integrated into the EPICS experiment control software. b). An important diagnostic of the state of the sample is the stability of the current response during data collection. For the pulsed-flow pattern used for the experiment, the current response depends on the solute concentration and the net flow rate. The current response for collection from trioxalatoferrate(II) is shown in Fig. 3(d). In cases where the sample flow through the electrode is disturbed by the formation of gas bubbles or the build-up of decomposition products, the current response becomes irregular (e.g. Fig. 3e).
experiments were recorded after the initial exponential current change was complete (typically 1–2 min). Typical current decay plots are shown in Fig. 3(2.3.2. Beamline
Iron K-edge experiments were performed at the wiggler beamline at the Australian Synchrotron (Glover et al., 2007). The storage ring operated at 3.0 GeV in top-up mode (200 mA). The incident photon energy was controlled using a cryogenically cooled Si(111) double-crystal monochromator, operated at the top of the rocking curve (`fully tuned'). Higher-order harmonics were rejected using an upstream vertically collimating mirror (Si), and a downstream toroidal focusing mirror (Rh). The energy scale was calibrated using an Fe metal foil as an internal standard with the first inflection point, E0, set to 7110.75 eV (Kraft et al., 1996).
XAS were typically collected between 6914 and 7974 eV (6914–7093 eV, 8 eV step, 2 s; 7093–7163 eV, 0.25 eV step, 2 s; above 7163 eV, step size approximately constant in k, increasing count time from 2 to 10 s) in fluorescence mode using a 100 pixel HP-Ge detector (Canberra). The 100 individual channels were normalized using the freeware Sakura (Kappen et al., 2015).
Calibration, averaging of multiple measurements and normalization of XANES data were performed using the XFit software package (Ellis & Freeman, 1995). The spectra were normalized (using the Spline program within the XFit package) according to the method of Penner-Hahn and co-workers (Weng et al., 2005) to match the tabulated X-ray data (Hubbell et al., 1974, 1975) for Fe [in a similar manner to the earlier work on Cr(III) XANES spectra] (Nguyen et al., 2008).
3. Results and discussion
A key element of the strategy underpinning the XAS-SEC cell design is the pulse-flow pattern of solution in the WE. This both maximizes contact between the solute and the WE (Yeo et al., 2012) and can minimize the impact of while maintaining efficient use of the sample. The utility of the approach is demonstrated by experiments conducted on solutions of K3[Fe(ox)3], a well known (Baumann et al., 1983; Fischer & Warneck, 1996; Krishnaan et al., 1981). leads to FeIII reduction and the oxidation of oxalate to CO2. Spectra recorded from the XAS-SEC cell for static and pulsed solutions of K3[Fe(ox)3] are shown in Fig. 4. For the static solution there was poor reproducibility of the which was manifest by an offset in the fluorescence intensity, the magnitude of which was not constant across the spectrum (Fig. 4, green traces). At longer, and variable, times there was a catastrophic loss of fluorescence intensity and a change in profile of the spectrum (Fig. 4, pink traces) which was consistent with the formation of gas bubbles at the point of irradiation of the sample. The application of the 41:40 pulse sequence shown in Fig. 2 allowed the collection of spectra that were consistent with a well defined FeIII species and with a high level of short- and long-term reproducibility of the spectra (Fig. 4, blue traces). The observed XANES matched closely that of the spectrum reported for intercalated [Fe(ox)3]3− in Mg2Al layered double hydroxide (Huang et al., 2012). It is important to note that the pulsed flow leads to a concentration of illuminated sample. If a 2 mm × 2 mm section of solution is considered to move back and forth with the pulsed flow, then the 41:40 pulse would correspond to a residence of 14 min in the 1.5 mm-wide beam. Since the beam height (0.25 mm) is less than the 2 mm height of the sample slot, mixing would reduce the effective residence time by a factor of eight, this being further reduced when account is taken of the lowering of the beam intensity with depth into the sample. Thus, the 41:40 pulse flow would correspond to a with the sample exposure to the X-ray beam equivalent to ∼1 min of irradiation of a static sample. Further, the flow characteristics of the system can be easily modified to accommodate the photosensitivity of the sample.
In addition to the spectra shown in Fig. 4, the impact of the pulsed flow on the background noise was assessed by monitoring time scans at constant energy. It was found that shorter higher-frequency pulses (e.g. 41:40 pulse) did not significantly increase the background noise while longer lower-frequency pulses (e.g. 500:490) introduced a sinusoidal component to the background signal.
While very stable results were generally obtained under pulsed flow conditions, some problems were also encountered due to the development of gas bubbles in the WE. This may be due to incomplete degassing of the solution, slow build-up of CO2 from photoreaction or possibly the diffusion of the He surrounding the sample through the Teflon tubing. The latter alternative is consistent with an increased incidence of bubble formation with larger inner diameter Teflon tubing. While He diffusion may be prevented by the use of higher-density tubing (PEEK, PEEKsil) the current room-temperature sample environment is too constricted to allow the use of less flexible tubing. Notwithstanding these issues, the current results demonstrate that the pulsed-flow method provides a very stable solution sample for measurements. Most importantly, photodamage can be minimized while maintaining a very low net sample requirement (26 µL h−1).
The electrochemical performance of the XAS-SEC cell is demonstrated by reduction of [Fe(ox)3]3− at a potential of ∼50 mV (versus normal hydrogen electrode), this being in a range close to that of heme proteins (Burgess, 1978). The application of a reducing potential of −400 mV to the WE immediately resulted in a strong current response that decayed to a steady-state current over a period of ∼20 s (Fig. 3b). Recovery of the was obtained by application of a potential of +0.4 V where the redox interconversion was complete in a similar time period. Associated with the electrochemical conversion between the [Fe(ox)3]3−/4− species are changes in the XANES, which are consistent with quantitative conversion between the species in the WE (Fig. 5). While the XANES spectrum of an authentic sample of [Fe(ox)3]4− appears not to have been published previously, the changes in the pre-edge features together with the sign and magnitude of the edge shift are consistent with that expected for FeII and FeIII complexes and the general form of the spectra are consistent with that of Fe(ox)·2H2O (Fang et al., 2012). This material has octahedral coordination of the FeII centre with a pair of trans water molecules with two oxalate ligands completing the coordination sphere. The oxalate ligands bridge adjacent Fe centres to give a linear chain structure (Yu et al., 2006). Comparison can be made between the XANES of trioxalatometallate(III/II) complexes of Fe and those recently published for Co; the latter were recorded as solids dispersed in cellulose and measured at 15 K (Best et al., 2016) (Fig. 5). Owing to the difference in valence electron count, some spectral changes are expected on moving from Fe to Co; however, the FeII and CoIII complexes are isoelectronic with similar geometry. As such, they may otherwise be expected to exhibit similar pre-edge features but this is not the case due to differences in spin state, with low-spin CoIII (Zarić & Niketić, 1991) and high-spin FeII (de S. Barros & Friedberg, 1966; Wendlandt & Simmons, 1966). For the low-spin, (t2g)6, complex the pre-edge transitions will be of 1s → 3d (eg) character (7706 eV), which even with multiplet splitting gives a single feature. The high spin, (t2g)4(eg)2, complex will have pre-edge transitions with both 1s → 3d (t2g) and 1s → 3d (eg) character and span a wider energy range (7112.5–7114.5 eV). Further, the simple one-electron reduction of [Fe(ox)3]3− in the XAS-SEC cell is clearly demonstrated by the similarity of the edge shift (∼2.5 eV) of the trioxalatometallate(III/II) complexes of Fe and Co. It is significant that the transformation can be achieved with control over photolytic decomposition of the sample and with very modest sample requirements.
An important area of application for the XAS-SEC cell is the study of redox proteins, and the applicability of the approach to biomolecules is demonstrated by preliminary measurements conducted on the redox transport protein, cyt c. Spectra were measured from relatively concentrated protein samples (5 mM) and with 4,4′-bipyridine as the redox mediator (Eddowes & Hill, 1979). Spectral changes consistent with the reduction of the FeIII form were observed immediately following the application of a reducing potential; however, reproducible spectra consistent with the fully reduced form required ∼10 min (Fig. 6a) to develop. The slow rate of electrosynthesis is consistent with the low rate of heterogeneous and this is reflected by the current response from the XAS-SEC cell (Fig. 6b). The stability of the current response during the collection of is an important independent check of the stability of the sample and the state of the WE during the experiment.
The spectra of cyt c show a seemingly complicated set of potential-dependent spectral changes that are most straightforwardly interpreted using the pre-edge features. Prior to reduction, a broadened band at 7114 eV is observed (Fig. 6a), this being most consistent with low-spin ferricyt c (Cheng et al., 1999; Giachini et al., 2007). Reduction leads to broad pre-edge features near 7112.5 and 7114.5 eV reminiscent of high-spin [Fe(ox)3]4− and attributable to high-spin ferrocyt c. This is in contrast to measurements from samples at low temperatures (Cheng et al., 1999; Giachini et al., 2007) where a single sharp pre-edge feature near 7112 eV is observed and interpreted as due to a low-spin form. Reoxidation is not accompanied by the recovery of the initial spectrum, but is marked by a small shift of the bands to higher energy with an increase in intensity and decrease in the half-widths. These observations are typical of high-spin FeII and FeIII proteins (Rich et al., 1998) and suggest that oxidation leads to high-spin ferricyt c. The conversion of low-spin to high-spin ferricyt c by redox cycling through high-spin ferrocyt c has been previously reported based on surface-enhanced resonance Raman measurements (Hildebrandt & Stockburger, 1986), where the role of the Ag electrode in stabilization of the high-spin FeIII form a matter of speculation. The XAS-SEC measurements from cyt c suggest that similar behaviour occurs at a A more detailed exploration of these effects requires further studies with more biologically relevant redox mediators and is beyond the scope of this manuscript. However, the current experiments demonstrate the importance of complementing cryogenic measurements with spectra recorded under physiologically relevant conditions.
4. Conclusions
Sampling strategies for the measurement of in situ electrosynthesis, and, when combined with rapid modes of data collection (Ginder-Vogel et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2015) and advanced spectroscopic techniques (Chen et al., 2014), will facilitate the study of reactive species generated at specific potentials under conditions of pH and that match those relevant to the chemical or biochemical sample. These issues are particularly important to resolving the details of catalytic systems but can also impact significantly on measurements from environmental samples where beam damage constraints require that measurements be conducted at low temperatures. The low and efficient use of sample makes possible structural investigation of the stable redox states of metalloproteins available only in ∼1 mM concentration in 0.5–1 ml quantities.
spectra from solutions either in their resting or redox modulated states have been described. The approach allows the optimization of flow patterns so as to minimize beam damage while limiting the quantity of sample needed for the measurement of spectra. The XAS-SEC cell in the pulsing mode allows rapid, controlledAcknowledgements
SPB and PAL gratefully acknowledge the Australian Research Council for funding associated with this research (SPB: DP110101896; PAL: DP130103566 and DP140100176). Mr Marino Artuso is thanked for his skilled machining and input into the design of the XAS-SEC cell used in the work. This research was undertaken on the
beamline at the Australian Synchrotron, Victoria, Australia.References
Alonso, D. O. V., Dill, K. A. & Stigter, D. (1991). Biopolymers, 31, 1631–1649. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bae, I. T., Tolmachev, Y., Mo, Y., Scherson, D., Scheidt, W. R., Ellison, M. K., Cheng, M. C., Armstrong, R. S. & Lay, P. A. (2001). Inorg. Chem. 40, 3256–3258. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
de S. Barros, S. & Friedberg, S. A. (1966). Phys. Rev. 141, 637–640. Google Scholar
Baumann, H., Strehmel, B., Timpe, H. J. & Rehorek, D. (1983). J. Prakt. Chem. 325, 753–763. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Beattie, J. K. (1988). Adv. Inorg. Chem. 32, 1–53. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Best, S. P. & Cheah, M. H. (2010). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 79, 185–194. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Best, S. P., Kolev, S. D., Gabriel, J. R. P. & Cattrall, R. W. (2016). J. Membr. Sci. 497, 377–386. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bond, A. M. & Scholz, F. (2010). Electroanalytical Methods: Guide to Experiments and Applications, 2nd Rev., extended ed. Greifswald: Springer. Google Scholar
Bondin, M. I., Borg, S. J., Cheah, M.-H. & Best, S. P. (2006). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75, 1878–1883. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bondin, M. I., Borg, S. J., Cheah, M. H., Foran, G. & Best, S. P. (2006a). Aust. J. Chem. 59, 263–272. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bondin, M. I., Foran, G. & Best, S. P. (2001). Aust. J. Chem. 54, 705–709. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Burgess, J. (1978). Metal Ions in Solution. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Chapman, H. N. et al. (2011). Nature (London), 470, 73–77. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cheah, M. H. & Best, S. P. (2011). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 1128–1137. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Chen, L. X., Zhang, X. & Shelby, M. L. (2014). Chem. Sci. 5, 4136–4152. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Cheng, M. C., Rich, A. M., Armstrong, R. S., Ellis, P. J. & Lay, P. A. (1999). Inorg. Chem. 38, 5703–5708. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Craig, G. A., Roubeau, O. & Aromí, G. (2014). Coord. Chem. Rev. 269, 13–31. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Day, P., Smith, D. W. & Williams, R. J. P. (1967). Biochemistry, 6, 1563–1566. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Dewald, H. D., Watkins, J. W. II, Elder, R. C. & Heineman, W. R. (1986). Anal. Chem. 58, 2968–2975. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Dickson, C. F., Rich, A. M., D'Avigdor, W. M. H., Collins, D. A. T., Lowry, J. A., Mollan, T. L., Khandros, E., Olson, J. S., Weiss, M. J., Mackay, J. P., Lay, P. A. & Gell, D. A. (2013). J. Biol. Chem. 288, 19986–20001. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Eddowes, M. J. & Hill, H. A. O. (1979). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 4461–4464. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ellis, P. J. & Freeman, H. C. (1995). J. Synchrotron Rad. 2, 190–195. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fang, L., Cao, Y., Huang, Q., Walker, S. L. & Cai, P. (2012). Water Res. 46, 5613–5620. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Feng, L., Gell, D. A., Zhou, S. P., Gu, L. C., Kong, Y., Li, J. Q., Hu, M., Yan, N., Lee, C., Rich, A. M., Armstrong, R. S., Lay, P. A., Gow, A. J., Weiss, M. J., Mackay, J. P. & Shi, Y. G. (2004). Cell, 119, 629–640. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Fischer, M. & Warneck, P. (1996). J. Phys. Chem. 100, 15111–15117. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
George, G. N., Pickering, I. J., Pushie, M. J., Nienaber, K., Hackett, M. J., Ascone, I., Hedman, B., Hodgson, K. O., Aitken, J. B., Levina, A., Glover, C. & Lay, P. A. (2012). J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 875–886. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Giachini, L., Francia, F., Cordone, L., Boscherini, F. & Venturoli, G. (2007). Biophys. J. 92, 1350–1360. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ginder-Vogel, M., Landrot, G., Fischel, J. S. & Sparks, D. L. (2009). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 16124–16128. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Glover, C., McKinlay, J., Clift, M., Barg, B., Boldeman, J., Ridgway, M., Foran, G., Garret, R., Lay, P. & Broadbent, A. (2007). AIP Conf. Proc. 882, 884–886. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Guionneau, P. (2014). Dalton Trans. 43, 382–393. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harris, D. & Loew, G. (1993). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 8775–8779. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Hennig, C., Tutschku, J., Rossberg, A., Bernhard, G. & Scheinost, A. C. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 6655–6661. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, P. & Stockburger, M. (1986). J. Phys. Chem. 90, 6017–6024. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Wu, P., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Zhu, N., Wu, J. & Li, P. (2012). Appl. Clay Sci. 65–66, 87–94. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hubbell, J. H., McMaster, W. H., Del Grande, N. K. & Mallett, J. H. (1974). X-ray Cross Sections and Attenuation Coefficients, §2.1. in International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Vol. 4, edited by J. A. Ibers & W. C. Hamilton, pp. 47–70. Birmingham: Kynoch Press. Google Scholar
Hubbell, J. H., Veigele, W. J., Briggs, E. A., Brown, R. T., Cromer, D. T. & Howerton, R. J. (1975). J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 4, 471–538. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hutchens, T. W. & Yip, T. T. (1991). J. Inorg. Biochem. 42, 105–118. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Johansson, L. C. et al. (2012). Nat. Methods, 9, 263–265. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kaim, W. & Klein, A. (2008). Spectroelectrochemistry. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry. Google Scholar
Kappen, P., Ruben, G. & Moll, A. (2015). Sakura: a tool to pre-process fluorescence XAS data from multi-pixel detectors, https://www.synchrotron.org.au/aussyncbeamlines/x-ray-absorption-spectroscopy/sakura . Google Scholar
Kraft, S., Stümpel, J., Becker, P. & Kuetgens, U. (1996). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 681–687. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Krishnaan, G. U., Doshi, M. H. & Shah, A. B. (1981). Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 47, 345–350. CAS Google Scholar
Levina, A., Armstrong, R. S. & Lay, P. A. (2005). Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 141–160. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Levina, A., Foran, G. J., Pattison, D. I. & Lay, P. A. (2004). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 462–465. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Levina, A., McLeod, A. I., Gasparini, S. J., Nguyen, A., De Silva, W. G. M., Aitken, J. B., Harris, H. H., Glover, C., Johannessen, B. & Lay, P. A. (2015). Inorg. Chem. 54, 7753–7766. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Levina, A., McLeod, A. I. & Lay, P. A. (2014). Chem. Eur. J. 20, 12056–12060. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Malati, M. A. (1999). Experimental Inorganic/Physical Chemistry, 1st ed. Chichester: Horwood. Google Scholar
McBreen, J., O'Grady, W. E., Pandya, K. I., Hoffman, R. W. & Sayers, D. E. (1987). Langmuir, 3, 428–433. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Milsmann, C., Levina, A., Harris, H. H., Foran, G. J., Turner, P. & Lay, P. A. (2006). Inorg. Chem. 45, 4743–4754. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Nakamura, M. & Takahashi, M. (2013). Mössbauer Spectroscopy: Applications in Chemistry, Biology, and Nanotechnology, ch. 10, pp. 177–201. John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
Nakanishi, K., Kato, D., Arai, H., Tanida, H., Mori, T., Orikasa, Y., Uchimoto, Y., Ohta, T. & Ogumi, Z. (2014). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 084103. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, A., Mulyani, I., Levina, A. & Lay, P. A. (2008). Inorg. Chem. 47, 4299–4309. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Nihei, M., Shiga, T., Maeda, Y. & Oshio, H. (2007). Coord. Chem. Rev. 251, 2606–2621. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Osheroff, N., Borden, D., Koppenol, W. H. & Margoliash, E. (1980). J. Biol. Chem. 255, 1689–1697. CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Permien, S., Indris, S., Schürmann, U., Kienle, L., Zander, S., Doyle, S. & Bensch, W. (2016). Chem. Mater. 28, 434–444. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rich, A. M., Armstrong, R. S., Ellis, P. J., Freeman, H. C. & Lay, P. A. (1998). Inorg. Chem. 37, 5743–5753. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Takao, K., Takao, S., Scheinost, A. C., Bernhard, G. & Hennig, C. (2010). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 363, 802–806. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wachs, I. E. (2003). Catal. Commun. 4, 567–570. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Weckhuysen, B. M. (2003). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 4351–4360. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wendlandt, W. W. & Simmons, E. L. (1966). J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 28, 2420–2422. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Weng, T.-C., Waldo, G. S. & Penner-Hahn, J. E. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 506–510. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wiltshire, R. J. K., Smila-Castro, O., Connelly, N. G., Matthews, S. M., Fisher, A. C. & Rayment, T. (2009). J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 308–315. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yeo, J., Cheah, M. H., Bondin, M. I. & Best, S. P. (2012). Aust. J. Chem. 65, 241–253. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yu, J.-H., Hou, Q., Bi, M.-H., Lü, Z., Zhang, X., Qu, X.-J., Lu, J. & Xu, J.-Q. (2006). J. Mol. Struct. 800, 69–73. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zarić, S. & Niketić, S. R. (1991). Polyhedron, 10, 2665–2672. Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Lawson Daku, M. L., Zhang, J., Suarez-Alcantara, K., Jennings, G., Kurtz, C. A. & Canton, S. E. (2015). J. Phys. Chem. C, 119, 3312–3321. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.