|
|
|
Figure 4
Using the distribution of particle sizes shown in Fig. 3 , the theoretical fluorescence signal versus incident beam angle was plotted. Compared with the 16.1 nm fit shown in Fig. 1 , the profile is broader and overall is a better fit. |
|
|
|
Figure 4
Using the distribution of particle sizes shown in Fig. 3 , the theoretical fluorescence signal versus incident beam angle was plotted. Compared with the 16.1 nm fit shown in Fig. 1 , the profile is broader and overall is a better fit. |