research papers
Development of picosecond time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy by high-repetition-rate laser pump/X-ray probe at Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility
aBeijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China, bUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China, and cAccelerator Division, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: taoy@ihep.ac.cn
A new setup and commissioning of transient X-ray absorption spectroscopy are described, based on the high-repetition-rate laser pump/X-ray probe method, at the 1W2B wiggler beamline at the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility. A high-repetition-rate and high-power laser is incorporated into the setup with in-house-built avalanche photodiodes as detectors. A simple acquisition scheme was applied to obtain laser-on and laser-off signals simultaneously. The capability of picosecond transient X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurement was demonstrated for a photo-induced spin-crossover iron complex in 6 mM solution with 155 kHz repetition rate.
1. Introduction
Picosecond pulses and well defined pulse structure make synchrotrons a desirable light source for time-resolved experiments. Picosecond X-ray time-resolved experiments have been developed based on the pump–probe method, in which a laser pulse first excites a sample and then an X-ray pulse with accurate delay captures the structure of the et al., 2014; Milne et al., 2014; Elsaesser & Woerner, 2010; Kim et al., 2016). The difference between the laser-on and laser-off signals contains dynamic structure information, but it is generally so small that high-quality data are essential for reliable analysis. X-ray absorption spectroscopy can capture the geometrical and electronic structure of the selected atom, such that time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy has been developed over the last few decades at synchrotrons and recently also at X-ray free electron lasers, and this powerful time-resolved probe has been widely applied in diverse fields. Instrumentation and applications of this method have been well reviewed (Chen, 2005; Bressler & Chergui, 2010; Chen et al., 2010, 2014; Milne et al., 2014; Bostedt et al., 2016; Chergui, 2016). The technique of time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy was pioneered at 20 Hz repetition rate with microsecond resolution (Mills et al., 1984) and later realised at 1 kHz repetition rate with picosecond resolution at synchrotrons (Jennings et al., 2002; Saes et al., 2004; Nozawa et al., 2007). At a synchrotron source, however, the X-ray probe usually comes from a single bunch with repetition rate ranging from several hundreds of kHz to MHz. To obtain high-quality data, it is desirable to match the repetition rate of the laser pulse with that of the X-ray pulse. Therefore, high-repetition-rate pump–probe detection has been developed recently in transient X-ray absorption spectroscopy (Lima et al., 2011; March et al., 2011; Stebel et al., 2011; Göries et al., 2016), emission spectroscopy (Haldrup et al., 2012; Vankó et al., 2013; March et al., 2015), scattering (Haldrup et al., 2012) and diffraction (Navirian et al., 2012; Kozina et al., 2014). To meet the requirements of extremely photon-hungry experiments, like X-ray emission spectroscopy or X-ray solution scattering, some time-resolved experiments have utilized all the X-ray pulses from the storage ring, rather than singlet pulses, with several MHz repetition rate (Haldrup et al., 2012; Vankó et al., 2013; March et al., 2015).
at that moment. A molecular movie can be obtained if snapshots are taken at different moments during this dynamic process (ChenWe have built up ultrafast X-ray diffraction detection based on a 1 kHz repetition rate laser pump/X-ray probe scheme at the 1W2B beamline (Sun et al., 2016). However, the low X-ray of <1 kHz rate made it extremely difficult to realise the detection of transient Therefore, a high-repetition-rate pump–probe method is essential if we want to obtain transient data with adequate quality within a realistic beam time. In the meantime, it is desirable to improve the data quality of ultrafast X-ray diffraction detection under high repetition rate. Here we describe the setup and commissioning of a high-repetition-rate pump–probe method for detection of transient Transient has been applied on a photo-induced spin-crossover iron complex to evaluate the performance of the setup.
2. Experimental setup
2.1. X-ray source
The Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF) is a parasitic light source sharing a storage ring with the Beijing Electron and Positron Collider. In dedicated synchrotron mode the ring energy is 2.5 GeV and the total beam current is 250 mA in top-up mode. The fill frequency is 5 Hz in top-up mode. Hybrid fill pattern mode has become a routine operation with a singlet bunch placed in the gap of bunch trains, as described previously (Sun et al., 2016). The current of the singlet bunch is 2.5 mA at present. The revolution period of the singlet bunch is 804 ns and the repetition rate is 1.243 MHz. The gap between the singlet bunch and the bunch trains is variable; it is 150 ns under current detection. The X-ray is around 150 ps.
Beamline 1W2B is a wiggler beamline, and the . The beamline consists of a collimating mirror, a double-crystal fixed-exit Si(111) monochromator and a toroidal mirror. The X-ray energy covers 5–15 keV in practice. The X-ray is ∼2 × 1010 photons s−1 at 7 keV at the sample position, corresponding to ∼160 photons per hybrid pulse. The fluctuation of the hybrid pulse intensity is 0.4% (RMS).
spectrum of the wiggler source is displayed in Fig. 1In pump–probe experiments the laser spot size is required to be larger than the X-ray spot size at the sample position to excite the sample throughout. A polycapillary lens focuses the X-rays to 90 µm (FWHM) in two dimensions at 7.2 keV. The spot size and . This kind of capillary lens has been used in high-pressure detection at the 4W1B wiggler beamline at BSRF (Chen et al., 2013). The laser and X-ray focus sizes were obtained simultaneously by performing knife-edge scans. The stability of the X-ray spot during the energy scan was measured, as shown in Fig. 2. A fluorescence image of the X-ray spot on the scintillator screen was recorded by CCD camera. Then the image was processed to locate the centre position of the X-ray spot. To imitate real X-ray absorption spectroscopy collection, the X-ray energy was continuously scanned over a 900 eV range multiple times during the camera-recording process. The peak-to-peak fluctuation is less than 10% of the X-ray spot size.
of the capillary lens are summarized for different energies in Table 1
|
2.2. High-repetition-rate laser and synchronization
A high-repetition-rate and high-power fibre laser (Tangerine HP, Amplitude Systems) is installed at the 1W2B beamline. The power of the 1030 nm fundamental is 35 W with a maximum 200 µJ pulse energy. The repetition rate is up to 20 MHz. Parameters of the laser output are summarized in Table 2. The is adjustable from 300 fs to 10 ps. The second or third harmonic output is often used for experiments. The laser is focused by lenses. The spot size can be adjusted to reach the desirable fluence by changing the focusing lens position along the laser propagation direction. The repetition rate is dependent on the required laser fluence in the experiment.
|
The synchronization between the X-ray and laser pulse is realised by locking the repetition rate and phase of the oscillator pulse with the storage ring RF signal which has been down divided from 499.8 MHz to 41.65 MHz. Compared with the previous synchronization setup (Sun et al., 2016), the synchronization has been improved, as depicted in Fig. 3. The 500 MHz RF signal is transmitted to the beamline through a clock distribution system (Libera Synch, Instrumentation Technologies), which suppresses the jitter fluctuation in long-distance transmission. The jitter between the RF signal and the laser oscillator signal is less than 500 fs, measured by a signal source analyzer (FSWP8, R&W). The RF signal is input into a programmable delay line (Cobly) before input into the laser oscillator. Fine delay adjustment is made using the programmable delay line with minimum 0.5 ps step and a range of 100 ns. Coarse tuning is realised by selecting different pulses from the oscillator in 24 ns steps, the period of the oscillator pulse.
2.3. Spatial and temporal overlap
Instead of using an X-ray exposure film to determine the spatial overlap, as done previously (Sun et al., 2016), a YAG scintillator crystal screen is used, since the visible fluorescence excited by the X-rays is observable. The fluorescence image of the X-ray focus is observed by microscope. The X-ray position is labelled on a computer, and the spatial overlap can be realised by moving the laser spot to the centre of the labelled area, as shown in the inset of Fig. 4. Then the liquid jet centre is aligned with the position of the surface of the YAG screen to reach the overlap. Fine adjustment is optimized by the sample signal.
After spatial overlap, temporal overlap is achieved by using a fast diode that is sensitive to both X-rays and laser, as shown in Fig. 4. To improve the X-ray signal response, a windowless InGaAs fast photodiode is used with a rise time of 700 ps. The overlap accuracy could be controlled within 200 ps. As with the optimization of the spatial overlap, fine adjustment is optimized by the sample signal.
2.4. Liquid jet
A liquid jet is essential for transient shows a liquid jet chamber that was designed to provide a closed room for the sample illuminated by X-ray and laser beams. A sealed chamber is essential for air-sensitive samples. The design enables an detector (APD) to be close enough for maximum signal collection. Two 20 µm-thick diamond films are used as incident and exit window for both X-ray and laser beams. The solution is circulated by a gear pump with a stainless steel tube as nozzle. The inner diameter of the tube is 0.25 mm or 0.5 mm. The liquid flow rate can reach 10 m s−1.
measurements, since the solution sample needs to be circulated to avoid radiation damage. Fig. 52.5. Detector and Soller slit
We use the fluorescence mode to record the transient X-ray absorption signal. In-house-built APDs are used as detectors, since their nanosecond response is favourable for detection of the signal from the desired bunch. The sensor size is 10 mm × 10 mm with a rise time of ∼2 ns. The detector has a good linearity with count rates up to 8 MHz (Li et al., 2017). The APD sensor is sealed with a beryllium window to block laser scattering. Light-tightness was confirmed with the laser on but X-ray off before collection. As shown in Fig. 6, four APDs are utilized including one for incident (Io APD), two for sample fluorescence (APD 1 and 2) and one for the reference foil as energy calibration (APD3). The Io signal is obtained by detecting the scattering of the X-rays from a thin Mylar film. A laser power meter monitors the laser power stability by measuring the transmitted beam during data collection.
Photocatalysts generally work under low concentrations of less than 10 mM. Therefore, a Soller slit with Z−1 filter is needed to block the scattering signal and attenuate fluorescence from the X-ray filter. A cone-shaped Soller slit was designed and manufactured in stainless steel by 3D metal printing. Its transmission efficiency is calculated to be 71.8%. The thickness of the Soller slit is 5.5 mm, and it is calculated that 96% fluorescence from the filter could be blocked. With the Soller slit plus the Z−1 filter the silicon drift detector confirmed that the dominant signal came from the Kα fluorescence of the sample.
2.6. Data acquisition
The fluorescence signal was estimated to be less than 0.01 photon per X-ray pulse for the model iron complex, so the detection is a single-photon event and we use counting mode to collect the signal. A simple gate scheme is applied to obtain the laser-on and laser-off signals simultaneously. Both laser-on and laser-off gates were generated using digital delay generators (DG645, SRS). The laser-off gate is generated in burst mode. Fig. 7 shows the gate signal with a laser-on:laser-off ratio of 1:3. The number of delay cycles in the burst (burst count) is three. The gate signals are sent to constant fraction discriminators (CFDs) (CFD 935, ORTEC), which are triggered under gate mode to select the desired laser-on and laser-off signals simultaneously. The output from the CFDs was counted by counters (counter 974, ORTEC). The incident signal and the reference foil signals are gated as well.
3. Commissioning result of picosecond transient XAS
We applied the developed transient 3. The iron atom is coordinated to six nitrogen atoms in octahedral configuration, and each phenanthroline ligand provides two nitrogen atoms for coordination. Fe(II)(phen)3 is a low-spin (LS) complex in its ground state, but could be photo-excited to a high-spin (HS) state upon spin crossover. In the relaxation from HS to LS, the lifetime is ∼700 ps, which is desirable for a 150 ps X-ray pulse probe. This complex has been well studied using a synchrotron source (Nozawa et al., 2010), so it is a suitable candidate for evaluating the performance of our high-repetition-rate pump–probe setup.
on a model iron complex, 1,10-phenanthroline iron(II) sulfate, Fe(II)(phen)The sample was purchased from Alfa Aesar and used without any further purification. The optical absorption is displayed in Fig. 8. The strongest absorption is at 510 nm, corresponding to a transition. In the pump–probe experiment, the excitation wavelength is 515 nm. The inset shows an image of a laser spot on the liquid jet. The excitation repetition rate has been tested at 155 and 311 kHz. The 155 kHz mode was selected as it yields the maximum pulse energy of 200 µJ to improve the excitation fraction. The laser is 760 fs. A Mn filter with 3 attenuation lengths is used. The flow rate is ∼10 m s−1 with a nozzle of 0.25 mm inner diameter.
Fig. 9(a) displays the transient X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) collected in 3 h. A remarkable difference can be seen between the laser-on and laser-off spectra. In the inset, a zoom of the pre-edge region (black arrow) shows the decrease of the magnitude of the pre-edge peak with laser-on. This decrease is direct evidence of the HS excitation state (Nozawa et al., 2010). The laser-on spectrum contains contributions from both ground state and so the difference spectrum generated from laser-on minus laser-off can highlight the signal (Fig. 9b). The difference is in agreement with the reported result (Nozawa et al., 2010). The β feature shown in Fig. 9(b) is related to electronic change while the γ feature and the features at higher energy correspond to geometrical structure change.
To evaluate the relaxation process from HS to LS, the X-ray energy is fixed at 7125 eV, i.e. the peak position of the β feature. The difference signal at this energy was scanned as a function of the delay between laser pulse and X-ray pulse. As presented in Fig. 10, the evolution data could be fitted with a single exponential function convoluted with a Gaussian function (150 ps FWHM) for the X-ray The lifetime is found to be 685 ps, in agreement with the reported value (Nozawa et al., 2010).
4. Summary and outlook
We have implemented the laser pump/X-ray probe method at high repetition rate. Transient XANES can now be obtained with adequate signal-to-noise ratio within a few hours. Due to low via nanosecond time resolution, therefore each bunch signal will be distinguished by its time. Second and third harmonics of the laser are only available for excitation at present. An optical parameter amplifier will soon be installed to realise the excitation range from 210 to 11000 nm.
the transient measurement will consume a much longer beam time under the current configuration. To improve the multiple-element APD detectors will help substantially. A linear combination of triple APD sensors with customized electronics is under design. Two combinations are expected to improve the total count rate by a factor of three. Based on the field-programmable gate array technique, a new data acquisition method will enable all bunch signals to be recordedWith the realisation of the transient et al., 2014). Femtosecond is under planning by utilizing high-energy-resolution superconducting microcalorimeter spectrometry (Uhlig et al., 2013). The synchrotron has merits in wide tunable X-ray energy, higher pulse intensity stability, high repetition rate and diverse X-ray probes from the picosecond to microsecond range.
measurement, a unique X-ray time-resolved platform is in shape at BSRF with the capability of multiple time scale detection from femtoseconds to microseconds. This platform includes both laser plasma table-top X-ray source and synchrotron source. The laser plasma source is superior in the femtosecond X-ray pulse, which enables femtosecond X-ray diffraction (ZhangAcknowledgements
We thank C. J. Milne of SwissFEL, Xiaoyi Zhang, A. M. March and Gilles Doumy of APS, and Wojciech Gawelda of EXFEL for their valuable advice. We are grateful to Qingyuan Meng of the Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry for his advice on model complex. Special thanks to Jun He for his assistance in the data acquisition setup. Lingfei Hu helped with the calculation of the wiggler
spectrum. The authors declare no competing financial interests.Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: High Energy Photon Source-Test Facility; National Natural Science Foundation of Chinahttps://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809 (award No. U1332205).
References
Bostedt, C., Boutet, S., Fritz, D. M., Huang, Z., Lee, H. J., Lemke, H. T., Robert, A., Schlotter, W. F., Turner, J. J. & Williams, G. J. (2016). Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015007. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Bressler, C. & Chergui, M. (2010). Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61, 263–282. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, D. L., Dong, J. C., Zhang, X. L., Quan, P. Y., Liang, Y. X., Hu, T. D., Liu, J., Wu, X., Zhang, Q. & Li, Y. D. (2013). J. Synchrotron Rad. 20, 243–248. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chen, L. X. (2005). Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 56, 221–254. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chen, L. X., Zhang, X., Lockard, J. V., Stickrath, A. B., Attenkofer, K., Jennings, G. & Liu, D.-J. (2010). Acta Cryst. A66, 240–251. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chen, L. X., Zhang, X. & Shelby, M. L. (2014). Chem. Sci. 5, 4136–4152. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Chergui, M. (2016). Struct. Dynam. 3, 031001. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Elsaesser, T. & Woerner, M. (2010). Acta Cryst. A66, 168–178. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Göries, D., Dicke, B., Roedig, P., Stübe, N., Meyer, J., Galler, A., Gawelda, W., Britz, A., Gessler, P., Sotoudi Namin, H., Beckmann, A., Schlie, M., Warmer, M., Naumova, M., Bressler, C., Rübhausen, M., Weckert, E. & Meents, A. (2016). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 053116. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Haldrup, K., Vankó, G., Gawelda, W., Galler, A., Doumy, G., March, A. M., Kanter, E. P., Bordage, A., Dohn, A., van Driel, T. B., Kjaer, K. S., Lemke, H. T., Canton, S. E., Uhlig, J., Sundström, V., Young, L., Southworth, S. H., Nielsen, M. M. & Bressler, C. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 9878–9887. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jennings, G., Jäger, W. J. H. & Chen, L. X. (2002). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 362–368. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kim, J., Kim, K. H., Oang, K. Y., Lee, J. H., Hong, K., Cho, H., Huse, N., Schoenlein, R. W., Kim, T. K. & Ihee, H. (2016). Chem. Commun. 52, 3734–3749. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kozina, M., Hu, T., Wittenberg, J. S., Szilagyi, E., Trigo, M., Miller, T. A., Uher, C., Damodaran, A., Martin, L., Mehta, A., Corbett, J., Safranek, J., Reis, D. A. & Lindenberg, A. M. (2014). Struct. Dynam. 1, 034301. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Li, Z., Li, Q., Jinfan, C., Ma, Y., Liu, P., Wang, Z., Hu, M. Y., Zhao, J., Alp, E. E., Xu, W., Tao, Y., Wu, C. & Zhou, Y. (2017). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. Submitted. Google Scholar
Lima, F. A., Milne, C. J., Amarasinghe, D. C. V., Rittmann-Frank, M. H., van der Veen, R. M., Reinhard, M., Pham, V. T., Karlsson, S., Johnson, S. L., Grolimund, D., Borca, C., Huthwelker, T., Janousch, M., van Mourik, F., Abela, R. & Chergui, M. (2011). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 063111. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
March, A. M., Assefa, T. A., Bressler, C., Doumy, G., Galler, A., Gawelda, W., Kanter, E. P., Németh, Z., Pápai, M., Southworth, S. H., Young, L. & Vankó, G. (2015). J. Phys. Chem. C, 119, 14571–14578. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
March, A. M., Stickrath, A., Doumy, G., Kanter, E. P., Krässig, B., Southworth, S. H., Attenkofer, K., Kurtz, C. A., Chen, L. X. & Young, L. (2011). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 073110. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Mills, D. M., Lewis, A., Harootunian, A., Huang, J. & Smith, B. (1984). Science, 223, 811–813. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Milne, C. J., Penfold, T. J. & Chergui, M. (2014). Coord. Chem. Rev. 277–278, 44–68. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Navirian, H., Shayduk, R., Leitenberger, W., Goldshteyn, J., Gaal, P. & Bargheer, M. (2012). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 063303. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Nozawa, S., Adachi, S., Takahashi, J., Tazaki, R., Guérin, L., Daimon, M., Tomita, A., Sato, T., Chollet, M., Collet, E., Cailleau, H., Yamamoto, S., Tsuchiya, K., Shioya, T., Sasaki, H., Mori, T., Ichiyanagi, K., Sawa, H., Kawata, H. & Koshihara, S. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 313–319. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nozawa, S., Sato, T., Chollet, M., Ichiyanagi, K., Tomita, A., Fujii, H., Adachi, S. & Koshihara, S. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 61–63. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saes, M., van Mourik, F., Gawelda, W., Kaiser, M., Chergui, M., Bressler, C., Grolimund, D., Abela, R., Glover, T. E., Heimann, P. A., Schoenlein, R. W., Johnson, S. L., Lindenberg, A. M. & Falcone, R. W. (2004). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 24–30. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Stebel, L., Malvestuto, M., Capogrosso, V., Sigalotti, P., Ressel, B., Bondino, F., Magnano, E., Cautero, G. & Parmigiani, F. (2011). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 123109. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Sun, D.-R., Xu, G.-L., Zhang, B.-B., Du, X.-Y., Wang, H., Li, Q.-J., Zhou, Y.-F., Li, Z.-J., Zhang, Y., He, J., Yue, J.-H., Lei, G. & Tao, Y. (2016). J. Synchrotron Rad. 23, 830–835. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Uhlig, J., Fullagar, W., Ullom, J. N., Doriese, W. B., Fowler, J. W., Swetz, D. S., Gador, N., Canton, S. E., Kinnunen, K., Maasilta, I. J., Reintsema, C. D., Bennett, D. A., Vale, L. R., Hilton, G. C., Irwin, K. D., Schmidt, D. R. & Sundström, V. (2013). Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 138302. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Vankó, G., Bordage, A., Glatzel, P., Gallo, E., Rovezzi, M., Gawelda, W., Galler, A., Bressler, C., Doumy, G., March, A. M., Kanter, E. P., Young, L., Southworth, S. H., Canton, S. E., Uhlig, J., Smolentsev, G., Sundström, V., Haldrup, K., van Driel, T. B., Nielsen, M. M., Kjaer, K. S. & Lemke, H. T. (2013). J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 188, 166–171. Google Scholar
Zhang, B. B., Sun, S. S., Sun, D. R. & Tao, Y. (2014). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 096110. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.