research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775

Synchrotron in situ studies of mechanical activation treatment and γ-radiation impact on structural-phase transitions and high-temperature synthesis parameters during the formation of γ-(TiAl) compound

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aPolzunov Altai State Technical University, Lenina Avenue, Barnaul 656038, Altai Region, Russian Federation, bInstitute for Water and Environmental Problems of Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Molodyoznaya, Barnaul 656038, Russian Federation, cInstitute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry of Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Kutateladze, Novosibirsk 630128, Russian Federation, dBudker Institute of Nuclear Physics of Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademika Lavrentieva Prospect, Novosibirsk 630090, Russian Federation, and eNational Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russian Federation
*Correspondence e-mail: anicpt@rambler.ru

Edited by I. Lindau, SLAC/Stanford University, USA (Received 30 March 2019; accepted 12 July 2019; online 19 August 2019)

In situ synchrotron studies of structure and phase formation dynamics in mechanically activated (t = 7 min, power density 40 g) and mechanically activated with subsequent irradiation by γ-quanta 60Co powder mixture (Ti 64 wt% + Al) during high-temperature synthesis by the method of thermal explosion using induction heating are described. In situ high-temperature synthesis was carried out on the created experimental complex adapted for synchrotron X-ray diffraction methods. The sequence of formation and time–temperature interval of the metastable and main phases were determined. The impact of preliminary mechanical activation and of γ-irradiation on the macrokinetic parameters of the synthesis were studied experimentally in situ. It has been established that the impact of γ-irradiation on the mechanically activated powder mixture of the composition Ti 64 wt% + Al leads to a change in the thermal parameters of combustion: the maximum synthesis temperature and the burning rate decrease. The heating rate for the non-irradiated mixture is 204.8 K s−1 and that for the irradiated mixture is 81.6 K s−1. The dependences of mass fractions of the synthesized compounds on time and temperature were calculated from the stage of preheating until completion of the thermal explosion. A single-phase equilibrium product of the composition γ-(TiAl) is formed in γ-irradiated mechanically activated mixture when the system reaches maximum temperature. The synthesized product of the mechanically activated mixture without γ-irradiation contains 72% γ-(TiAl); TiAl3 (26%) and residual Ti (2%) are also observed.

1. Introduction

One of the most promising areas in the development of new metallic materials with a high level of heat resistance and thermal stability is the creation of intermetallic alloys of the Ti–Al system (Weimer & Kelly, 2008[Weimer, M. & Kelly, T. (2008). Proceedings of the Structural Aluminides for Elevated Temperatures: Gamma Titanium and Other Metallic Aluminides Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, pp. 5-6.]; Clemens & Kestler, 2000[Clemens, H. & Kestler, H. (2000). Adv. Eng. Mater. 2, 551-570.]). These alloys can seriously compete with nickel-based superalloys, since titanium aluminides are lighter, have high corrosion resistance, resistance to high-temperature oxidation, high modulus of elasticity and strength, and do not require expensive and scarce elements for alloying. Obtaining single-phase compositions of titanium aluminides of various stoichiometry, including the method of high-temperature synthesis (SHS), has been the subject of many research works (Lagos et al., 2010[Lagos, M. A., Agote, I., Gutiérrez, M., Sargsyan, A. & Pambaguian, L. (2010). Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 19, 23-27.]; Novák et al., 2009[Novák, P., Kubásek, J., Šerák, J., Vojtěch, D. & Michalcová, A. (2009). Int. J. Mater. Res. 100, 353-355.]; Illeková et al., 2008[Illeková, E., Gachon, J. C., Rogachev, A., Grigoryan, H., Schuster, J. C., Nosyrev, A. & Tsygankov, P. (2008). Thermochim. Acta, 469, 77-85.]). However, the traditional SHS method allows only a strictly single-phase TiAl3 compound to be obtained (Wang & Zhang, 2006[Wang, T. & Zhang, J. (2006). Mater. Chem. Phys. 99, 20-25.]). The strictly single-phase compound Ti3Al (α2-phase) was synthesized using the microwave ultrafast heating method (Vaucher et al., 2011[Vaucher, S., Stir, M., Ishizaki, K., Catala-Civera, J. M. & Nicula, R. (2011). Thermochim. Acta, 522, 151-154.]) or the method of mechanically activated SHS (Filimonov et al., 2014[Filimonov, V. Yu., Sitnikov, A. A., Afanas'ev, A. V., Loginova, M. V., Yakovlev, V. I., Negodyaev, A. Z., Schreifer, D. V. & Solov'ev, V. A. (2014). Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 23, 18-25.]). An attempt to obtain a single-phase compound TiAl (γ-phase) using the mentioned methods was unsuccessful (Shi et al., 2015[Shi, Q., Qin, B., Feng, P., Ran, H., Song, B., Wang, J. & Ge, Y. (2015). RSC Adv. 5, 46339-46347.]). At the same time, out of all stable compounds this compound is the most practically significant both as refractory and heat-resistant (Appel & Oehring, 2003[Appel, F. & Oehring, M. (2003). Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Fundamentals and Applications, edited by C. Leyens & M. Peters, pp. 89-152. Wiley-VCH.]). Therefore, additional in situ experimental studies should be made to identify the peculiarities of the phase transformations in obtaining the γ-phase of TiAl, by the method of high-temperature synthesis.

Mechanical activation is one way of carrying out a targeted impact on a powder mixture, which allows an ideal contact between the reagents to be made and the reactivity of the mixture to be increased. However, such processes in solid phase materials have a number of important differences with processes in liquids or gases. These differences occur primarily due to the low diffusion rate in solids which prevents rapid levelling of the components' concentration in the system and obtaining of single-phase compounds. Thus, spatial localization of the processes occurs. A fast one-step dissolution and crystallization chemical reaction, as a rule, is observed in the composite precursors formed during the mechanical activation process (MA), where bulk mixing of reagents is achieved at the nanolevel with the formation of juvenile contact surfaces. Intermediate products formation occurs during many solid-phase reactions. These products then react with the starting components or with each other and give a final product of the reaction. Such solid-phase reactions are divided into several stages, each of them having a particular mechanism and kinetics. These reactions can be significantly affected by the size and shape of the reacting particles, the degree of their mixture homogeneity, the gas phase composition and temperature. The hierarchy of structural inhomogeneities has multiple phase boundaries and consequently chemical heterogeneity which leads to chemical transformations staging and multiphase product. It should be noted that mechanical activation is a method of hard impact on the powder mixture due to the high-energy effect of the planetary mill on the powder mixture. Indeed, the duration of mechanical treatment is measured in minutes, and the possibilities of structure management are very limited (Gras et al., 2006[Gras, C., Gaffet, E. & Bernard, F. (2006). Intermetallics, 14, 521-529.]). To implement a more accurate (sensitive) structure management method, γ-irradiation can be used. It has been found that in many cases γ-irradiation can serve as an effective technological tool that allows high-quality materials to be obtained, significantly improving and cheapening the production of many powder materials, improving their quality, and also changing the properties (Naundorf, 1992[Naundorf, V. (1992). Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 06, 2925-2986.]; Neklyudov & Voyevodin, 1994[Neklyudov, I. M. & Voyevodin, V. N. (1994). J. Nucl. Mater. 212-215, 39-44.]). It is important that radiation defects are formed on an even basis over the sample volume while being irradiated with fast electrons or 60Co γ-quanta. The primary acts of radiation damageability of the irradiated materials are connected to their electronic and atomic subsystems excitation, nuclear reactions and the displacement of the crystal lattice atoms from the initial equilibrium positions.

It is known that a substance turns into an amorphous state while reaching a certain critical concentration of defects, which can vary from ∼5 to 20% of displaced atoms or vacancies in the total number of atoms. As the irradiation dose increases, the increase in the number of defects should occur gradually and uniformly in the whole volume of the sample. It can be assumed that the processes of radiation-stimulated diffusion contribute to the processes of dissolution and homogenization, and alter the areas of the phases homogeneity and solid solutions in the volume of the mechanocomposite, creating favourable conditions for heterogeneous reaction at the interphase boundaries. Thus, the effect of γ-irradiation can be considered to be a subtle tool for changing the structural state of activated mixtures. It should be noted that γ-irradiation impact on the matrix structure of activated mixtures has not been studied well enough. It can be suggested that the preliminary impact on the powder materials of the Ti–Al system with the use of mechanical activation treatment followed by γ-irradiation will influence the processes of phase formation and the macrokinetic parameters of high-temperature synthesis (Sobachkin et al., 2018a[Sobachkin, A. V., Loginova, M. V., Sitnikov, A. A., Yakovlev, V. I., Filimonov, V. Yu. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018a). Mater. Sci. Eng. 327, 032051.]; Merzhanov & Abramov, 1981[Merzhanov, A. G. & Abramov, V. G. (1981). Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 6, 130-148.]).

In order to obtain products with specified properties in the synthesis of mechanically activated and γ-irradiated systems, one should understand the fundamental formation processes of structural and phase transitions in dynamic conditions. This requires achieving reliable information about the phase composition of intermediate products and the sequence of stages through which final product formation takes place. It is possible to solve these problems with the help of a `diffraction movie' – an in situ diffractometry synchrotron radiation method: diffraction field analysis (sequential shooting of a series of diffractograms) allows structural transformations in matter to be observed during the processes of deformation, melting, crystallization, synthesis, etc. (Mukasyan et al., 2010[Mukasyan, A. S., White, J. D. E., Kovalev, D. Y., Kochetov, N. A., Ponomarev, V. I. & Son, S. F. (2010). Physica B, 405, 778-784.]; Liss et al., 2009[Liss, K.-D., Whitfield, R. E., Xu, W., Buslaps, T., Yeoh, L. A., Wu, X., Zhang, D. & Xia, K. (2009). J. Synchrotron Rad. 16, 825-834.]; Loginova et al., 2019[Loginova, M., Sobachkin, A., Sitnikov, A., Yakovlev, V., Filimonov, V., Myasnikov, A., Sharafutdinov, M. & Tolochko, B. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 422-429.]).

Based on the above, the purpose of this work is to study the impact of mechanical activation and γ-irradiation in the Ti + Al powder mixture on in situ structure formation, phase formation and macrokinetic parameters during high-temperature synthesis in the thermal explosion mode.

2. Experimental technique

Mechanical mixtures of aluminium and titanium powders in the ratio Ti (64 wt%) + Al were used as the objects of the study. Mechanoactivation treatment of the initial powder mixtures was carried out for 7 min, with the energy intensity of the mill being 40 g (Loginova et al., 2015[Loginova, M. V., Filimonov, V. Yu., Yakovlev, V. I., Sytnikov, A. A., Negodyaev, A. Z. & Shreifer, D. V. (2015). Appl. Mech. Mater. 788, 117-122.]; Filimonov et al., 2008[Filimonov, V. Yu., Evstigneev, V. V., Afanas'ev, A. V. & Loginova, M. V. (2008). Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 17, 101-105.]). Then, mechanically activated powder mixtures were irradiated with γ-quanta in the certified stationary setup `Researcher' (isotope 60Co) under normal climatic conditions (Sobachkin et al., 2018b[Sobachkin, A. V., Loginova, M. V., Sitnikov, A. A., Yakovlev, V. I., Filimonov, V. Yu., Ivanov, S. G., Myasnikov, A. Yu. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018b). Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Explosive Production of New Materials: Science, Technology, Business and Innovations, 14-18 May 2018, St Petersburg, Russia, pp. 265-268 (https://doi.org/10.30826/EPNM18-092).]; Loginova et al., 2018a[Loginova, M. V., Yakovlev, V. I., Filimonov, V. Y., Sitnikov, A. A., Sobachkin, A. V., Ivanov, S. G. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018b). Lett. Mater. 8, 129-134.],b[Loginova, M. V., Yakovlev, V. I., Sitnikov, A. A., Filimonov, V. Yu., Sobachkin, A. V. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018c). J. Synch. Investig. 12, 480-484.]). The level of γ-quanta exposure was characterized by the absorbed dose Dγ = 5 × 104 Gy.

The next stage included in situ studies of the phase formation dynamics of the mixtures obtained during the process of high-temperature synthesis which were carried out using the method of dynamic diffractometry in synchrotron radiation (SR) beams. Radiation from the electron storage ring VEPP-3 of the `Diffraction movie' 5b station at the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia) was used. Continuous shooting of diffraction patterns was performed using monochromatic radiation at a wavelength of λ = 1.505 Å, in the scanning angle range 36–68°. The shot rate for the non-irradiated powder mixture was 1 s per shot, and for the γ-irradiated mixture (for a more detailed study) was 0.3 s per shot. High-temperature synthesis was carried out under identical conditions for each object of the study.

Registration of phase formation dynamics during the synthesis was carried out using an experimental complex on the basis of a microwave inductor (heating source), which was developed and adapted to the SR method. The powder mixture was poured into a graphite crucible which was quickly heated up by the inductor electromagnetic field. Temperature was controlled using a chromel–alumel thermocouple placed in the volume of the powder mixture. During the experiment, the inductor was disconnected when the maximum synthesis temperature was reached (Popova et al., 2013[Popova, A. A., Sobachkin, A. V., Nazarov, I. V., Yakovlev, V. I., Loginova, M. V., Sitnikov, A. A., Sharafutdinov, M. R. & Lyakhov, N. Z. (2013). Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 77, 120-122.]; Sobachkin et al., 2019[Sobachkin, A. V., Yu Myasnikov, A., Sitnikov, A. A. & Sharafutdinov, M. R. (2019). Mater. Sci. Eng. 483, 012061.]). The inductor and crucible were placed in an evacuated vacuum chamber and then filled with argon. The complex was mounted in the installation unit of the SR 5b station of the VEPP-3 drive (Fig. 1[link]) (Loginova et al., 2019[Loginova, M., Sobachkin, A., Sitnikov, A., Yakovlev, V., Filimonov, V., Myasnikov, A., Sharafutdinov, M. & Tolochko, B. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 422-429.]).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Experimental complex for registration of the dynamics of phase formation during high-temperature synthesis in thermal explosion mode: (a) mounted installation (1: experimental complex; 2: detector; 3: goniometer); (b) schematic of the experimental setup.

Heating was carried out using an inductor coil. The induction coil heated the graphite crucible, which in turn heated the powder mixture. Registration of the `diffraction film' was activated at the moment of self-ignition.

The stream of synchrotron radiation through the beryllium window falls on the surface of the reacting charge, and the diffracted radiation enters the detector. The experimental complex is equipped with a cooling system.

Phase and structural analysis of the in situ data were carried out using the dqv2 program developed at Institute of Nuclear Physics of Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia) especially for processing the `diffraction movie' obtained by the SR method.

The percentage of the recorded phases was calculated by a semi-quantitative method using the ratio of the maximum peaks values in the diffractograms without taking into account the mass absorption coefficients of the phases (determination error is 1–3%).

3. Results of the experiment and discussion

Fig. 2[link] shows in situ thermograms of the high-temperature synthesis process for Ti + Al powder mixtures (mechanically activated unirradiated and mechanically activated following γ-irradiation).

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
In situ thermograms of the high-temperature synthesis process of a Ti + Al powder mixture: (a) without γ-irradiation; (b) with γ-irradiation.

Analysis of the thermograms shows that the thermal explosion temperature for the unirradiated powder mixture [the corresponding inflection point; Fig. 2[link](a)] is T = 616°C; the maximum burning temperature is Tmax = 1287°C. The thermal explosion temperature for the γ-irradiated powder mixture is T = 620°C; the maximum burning temperature is Tmax = 1173°C [Fig. 2[link](b)]. Herewith, the interaction rate of the reactants for the γ-irradiated mixture decreases. The average rate of temperature increase for the non-irradiated mixture is 204.8 K s−1 and for the irradiated mixture is 81.6 K s−1.

On the shown in situ thermograms of the high-temperature synthesis process (Fig. 2[link]), two sections can be distinguished: section 1–2 is the heating stage of the powder mixture and section 2–3 is the thermal explosion stage (fast heating mode). Each section will be considered separately.

Figs. 3[link] and 4[link] show the `diffraction movie' projections taken from section 1–2, heating the powder mixture.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
`Diffraction movie' projections in the section of heating 1–2 of the mechanically activated non-irradiated powder mixture Ti + Al [Fig. 2(a)[link]].
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
`Diffraction movie' projections in the section of heating 1–2 of the mechanically activated and γ-irradiated powder mixture Ti + Al [Fig. 2(b)[link]].

The first shot of the `diffraction movie' for the mechanically activated powder mixture without irradiation (Fig. 3[link]) was recorded at the heating temperature of the system, T = 554.8°C, and the time from the beginning of heating the mixture was t = 76 s. The time from the beginning of heating the mixture to thermal explosion was t = 82 s. Seven shots of the `diffraction movie' with a frequency of 1 s per shot were recorded in this section.

The first shot of the `diffraction movie' for the mechanically activated and then γ-irradiated mixture (Fig. 4[link]) was recorded at the system heating temperature of T = 558.5°C, and the time from the beginning of heating the mixture was t = 86.9 s. The time from the beginning of heating the mixture to thermal explosion was t = 98.6 s. In section 1–2 of the powder mixture heating, 40 shots of the `diffraction movie' were recorded in situ with a frequency of 0.3 s per frame.

The transition from the initial components to the synthesis products in both cases already occurred at the first stage (1–2) of heating the powder mixture. The main phases TiAl and TiAl3, in both cases, had been formed before the systems reached maximum temperatures. However, there are some differences in the phase formation processes.

Besides the presence of the initial components and the formation of stable compounds TiAl, TiAl3, Ti3Al and TiAl2, metastable short-lived compounds Ti3Al5, Ti5Al11 and Ti9Al23 were formed in the mechanically activated and γ-irradiated powder mixture, in the heating stage (Fig. 4[link]) (recorded from T = 558°C). TiAl3 became the main phase in the whole section starting from the temperature T = 558°C.

A higher content of the initial components Ti and Al was observed in the mechanically activated powder mixture without γ-irradiation, in the heating section (Fig. 3[link]) at T = 555°C, compared with the previous experiment. TiAl, TiAl3 and TiAl2 were formed along with these compounds. The formation of the metastable phase Ti5Al11 also occurred. In both cases the formation of the reaction products had already occurred at the initial stage of heating to T = 555–558°C.

Fig. 5[link] shows the `diffraction movie' projection of a mechanically activated powder mixture, taken from section 2–3 of the thermal explosion.

[Figure 5]
Figure 5
`Diffraction movie' projections in the thermal explosion section 2–3 of the mechanically activated non-irradiated powder mixture of Ti + Al [Fig. 2(a)[link]].

The thermal explosion stage for the MA mixture begins with a particular breakpoint at T = 616°C (t = 83 s) [Fig. 2(a)[link]]. A sudden increase in temperature was registered from shot 8. The temperature at the end of the high-temperature synthesis reaction [point 3 in the thermogram, Fig. 2(a)[link]] is T = 1334°C (t = 88 s); the reaction duration is 6 s. The end of the reaction corresponds to the 13th shot of the `diffraction movie'. Six shots of the `diffraction movie' were recorded in situ with a frequency of 1 s per shot in section 2–3.

Single peaks of TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (202), recorded at section 2–3 starting from T = 586.9°C, t = 81 s (Fig. 6[link]), were used for analysis of the dependence of the interplanar spacing on temperature for the MA mixture at the stage of thermal explosion.

[Figure 6]
Figure 6
In situ variation of the interplanar spacing in the TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (202) planes with an increase in temperature during the high-temperature synthesis at the stage of chemical transformations (thermogram section 2–3) according to the SR `diffraction movie' [for the unirradiated mixture, Fig. 2(a)[link], Fig. 5[link]].

A decrease in interplanar spacing for TiAl (111) has been observed with an increase in temperature. At T = 756.5°C, t = 84 s, the interplanar spacing d = 2.3266 Å; at T = 1334°C, t = 88 s, and d = 2.3160 Å [standard TiAl (111), d = 2.31 Å, Card 5-678, J. Met., Duwez, Taylor, 4, 70, 1952; International database of powder diffractometry PDWin 3.0]. The interplanar spacing for TiAl3 (202) increases during the reaction with d = 1.7556 Å at T = 756.5°C, t = 84 s, up to d = 1.7596 Å at T = 1286.5°C, t = 86 s [standard TiAl3 (202), d = 1.75 Å, Card 2-1121, Z. Anorg. Chem., Brauer, 242, 4, 1939; International database of powder diffractometry PDWin 3.0]. Then a non-monotonic decrease in the interplanar spacing for TiAl3 (202) occurs.

Fig. 7[link] shows the in situ dependences in the intensity variation of the diffraction maxima of the main phases TiAl and TiAl3 in section 2–3 with temperature. Reflections corresponding to TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (202) were taken as information reflections.

[Figure 7]
Figure 7
In situ intensity variation of the main reflections of TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (202) with an increase of temperature during high-temperature synthesis at the stage of chemical transformations (thermogram section 2–3) according to the SR `diffraction movie' [for the unirradiated mixture, Fig. 2(a)[link], Fig. 5[link]].

In the area of the thermal explosion (section 2–3), an increase in the intensity of TiAl (111) occurs, which, at T = 1286–1292°C and t = 86–87 s, reaches Imax = 520 conventional (conv.) units, which indicates an increase in the volume fraction of the intermetallic compound TiAl. The intensity of TiAl3 (202) has a small value (Imed = 50 conv. units) and remains constant throughout the entire section 2–3. The dependences presented in Fig. 8[link] show that the half-width of the peak TiAl (111) decreases with time during the thermal explosion.

[Figure 8]
Figure 8
In situ variation of the half-width main reflections of TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (202) with temperature during high-temperature synthesis at the stage of chemical transformations (section 2–3 of the thermogram) according to the SR `diffraction movie' [for unirradiated mixture, Fig. 2(a)[link], Fig. 5[link]].

With regard to compound TiAl3 (202), the peak half-width is twice as large as that of TiAl (111) (from 0.46°, at the moment of thermal explosion, up to 0.37°, towards its completion).

Fig. 9[link] shows the `diffraction movie' projection of a mechanically activated and γ-irradiated powder mixture, recorded in the thermal explosion section 2–3.

[Figure 9]
Figure 9
`Diffraction movie' projections at section 2–3 of the thermal explosion for a γ-irradiated powder mixture of Ti + Al during high-temperature synthesis [Fig. 2(b)[link]].

For the mechanically activated and then γ-irradiated mixture, the thermal explosion stage begins with a particular break point at T = 620°C (t = 98.6 s) [Fig. 2(b)[link]]. The implementation of the high-temperature synthesis process takes place in this section. A sharp increase in temperature begins from shot 41 (when the system heating starts at t = 98.9 s). The temperature at the end of the reaction [corresponding to point 3 in the thermogram, Fig. 2(b)[link]] is 1190°C (t = 106.1 s), and the reaction time is 7.5 ± 0.3 s. The end of the reaction is shot 65 of the `diffraction movie'. Twenty-five frames of the `diffraction movie' were recorded in situ with a frequency of 0.3 s per frame in section 2–3.

In the thermal explosion section, the main phase composition for the mechanically activated and then γ-irradiated mixture starting at T = 620°C [Fig. 2(b)[link]] is TiAl, TiAl3, Ti and Ti3Al. Then, due to a sharp increase in temperature, the content of TiAl increases and its structure stabilizes. A small amount of phase TiAl3 is detected when the temperature reaches 1172.5°C (Fig. 9[link]).

It should be noted that the main phase composition for the mechanically activated mixture without γ-irradiation powder in this section is TiAl, TiAl3 and residual Ti. The phase composition remains stable at the maximum temperature. The content of TiAl increases, but becomes less in contrast to the previous experiment. The quantitative phase analysis is shown later in Figs. 13 and 14.

In situ, one can trace the interplanar spacing variation of the main phases with temperature in the thermal explosion section for reflections TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (004) (Fig. 10[link]). For analysis, we selected the strongest reflections of these phases recorded in this area. The nonmonotonic change in the interplanar spacing for TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (004) occurs with an increase in temperature. Thus, for TiAl3 (004) at temperature T = 790°C there is a minimum interplanar spacing d = 2.115 Å in this section; maximum d = 2.122 Å corresponds to T = 690–720°C [standard TiAl3 (004), d = 2.14 Å, Card 2-1121, Z. Anorg Chem., Brauer, 242, 4, 1939; International database of powder diffractometry PDWin 3.0]. At the temperature T = 1063.8°C for TiAl (111) the interplanar spacing stabilizes and remains stable until the end of the explosion: d = 2.3109 Å [standard TiAl (111), d = 2.31 Å, Card 5-678, J. Met., Duwez, Taylor, 4, 70, 1952; International database of powder diffractometry PDWin 3.0].

[Figure 10]
Figure 10
In situ interplanar spacing variation of the TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (004) cells with temperature during high-temperature synthesis at the thermal explosion stage (section 2–3 of the thermogram) according to the SR `diffraction movie' [for γ-irradiated mixture, Fig. 2(b)[link], Fig. 9[link]].

Fig. 11[link] shows the in situ variation dependences in the diffraction maxima intensity of the main phases of TiAl and TiAl3 in section 2–3 with temperature. The most intense reflections in the diffractograms corresponding to TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (004) were taken as information reflections.

[Figure 11]
Figure 11
In situ variation in the main reflections intensity of TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (004) with temperature during the high-temperature synthesis at the thermal explosion stage (section 2–3 in the thermograms) according to the SR `diffraction movie' [for γ-irradiated mixture, Fig. 2(b)[link], Fig. 9[link]].

The analysis of the dependences shows that the intensity of second phase TiAl3 (004) has a small value (Imax = 22–28 conv. units) and remains constant throughout the entire section 2–3. For TiAl (111) with an increase in the heating rate and an output to a thermal explosion, the intensity value increases rapidly from Imax = 100 conv. units at T = 1025°C and t = 103.4 s to Imax = 950 conv. units at T = 1172°C and t = 105.2 s.

Fig. 12[link] shows in situ dependences on temperature of the half-widths of peaks of diffraction maxima of the main phases TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (004) in section 2–3. By the end of the thermal explosion the TiAl (111) half-width decreases sharply (from 0.15° to 0.024°). The structure of the phase TiAl3 (004) is disordered, and the half-width increases (from 0.36° to 0.53°).

[Figure 12]
Figure 12
In situ variation of the main reflections half-width of TiAl (111) and TiAl3 (004) with temperature during high-temperature synthesis at the stage of chemical transformations (section 2–3 of the thermograms) according to the SR `diffraction movie' [for γ-irradiated mixture, Fig. 2(b)[link], Fig. 9[link]].

Figs. 13[link] and 14[link] show a quantitative picture of the in situ recorded phases percentage. The mass fractions of the observed phases have been calculated from the moment of the beginning of shooting up to the end of the thermal explosion. The formation of products, in both cases, begins already at the stage of heating the mixture; the initial components of Ti and Al are also present. At the warm-up stage TiAl3 (32–40%) dominates in terms of percentage in the mechanically activated and then γ-irradiated powder mixture (Fig. 13[link]); the content of TiAl increases from 14% to 25% with the temperature rise. The percentage of other phases is less than 20%. The original components of Ti and Al disappear when a thermal explosion starts in the system. The Al content at the beginning of shooting was about 21%, and for Ti about 25%. The content of metastable phases is less than 5%.

[Figure 13]
Figure 13
Mass fractions dependences of the in situ recorded phases on time and temperature at the stage of heating the γ-irradiated powder mixture (1–2) up to the end of the thermal explosion (2–3).
[Figure 14]
Figure 14
Mass fractions dependences of the in situ recorded phases on time and temperature at the stage of heating the mechanically activated non-irradiated powder mixture (1–2) up to the end of the thermal explosion (2–3).

In the thermal explosion section, the TiAl content increases rapidly with a sharp increase in temperature; the amount of TiAl reaches 92% at the system maximum temperature. The rest is occupied by TiAl3. In contrast to the previous experiment (Fig. 13[link]), the content of the initial components in the mechanically activated mixture (Fig. 14[link]) in the initial part of the heating exceeded the content of the formed compounds, e.g. Ti was about 27–28% and Al was about 26%. The content of TiAl at the stage of heating is about 20%, and for TiAl3 is 25%. When the system reaches thermal explosion, the TiAl content increases dramatically; at the time of the end of the thermal explosion, the TiAl content reaches 72%. At the same time, TiAl3 remain at 26% and Ti at 2%.

The experimental data analysis shows that the rearrangements of the obtained in situ diffraction patterns of the unirradiated and γ-irradiated mechanically activated powder mixtures reflect a complex process of structural phase transformations at all stages of high-temperature synthesis. It should be noted that the results of previous experiments (Loginova et al., 2018a[Loginova, M. V., Yakovlev, V. I., Filimonov, V. Y., Sitnikov, A. A., Sobachkin, A. V., Ivanov, S. G. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018b). Lett. Mater. 8, 129-134.],c[Loginova, M. V., Sobachkin, A. V., Sitnikov, A. A., Yakovlev, V. I., Filimonov, V. Yu., Ivanov, S. G., Myasnikov, A. Yu., Negodyaev, A. Z. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018a). Basic Probl. Mater. Sci. pp. 53-58.]) showed that preliminary γ-irradiation leads to partial annealing of defects, while the nanoscale scale of crystallites is preserved. Presumably, radiation-stimulated diffusion leads to the intensification of diffusion processes, the formation of transition zones at the contact boundary of reactants, and thus the creation of favourable conditions for accelerating mutual solid-phase diffusion at the interphase boundaries.

It is likely that, due to these effects, the rate of heating and maximum temperature of the irradiated sample decrease. The main difference in phase formation is the fact that the γ-irradiated sample is characterized by the presence of α2-phase (Ti3Al), which possibly determines a different direction in the development of synthesis processes. It can be assumed that the presence of the Ti3Al compound in the irradiated sample is associated with the formation of an extended diffusion zone in the contact area of the reactants upon irradiation. The latter may contribute to the formation of the wider range of compounds in the synthesis process (in accordance with the equilibrium diagram). With the disappearance of the α2-phase, the reaction product contains two phases, with the dominant content of the TiAl compound. The narrow diffraction peaks of γ-(TiAl) at the diffractograms of the irradiated mixture indicate that the composition has become homogenized despite the complexity of the reaction.

4. Conclusion

The following conclusions have been made on the basis of in situ experimental studies and processed results:

(1) An additional preliminary impact of γ-irradiation on mechanically activated Ti + Al powder mixture leads to a change in the thermal parameters of combustion: the maximum synthesis temperature and the burning rate decrease. For an unirradiated mixture Tmax = 1287°C; for an irradiated mixture Tmax = 1173°C. The characteristic heating rate for an unirradiated mixture is 204.8 K s−1, and for an irradiated mixture is 81.6 K s−1.

(2) The `diffraction movie' projections show that in both cases the formation of products occurs at the initial stage of heating the system before the start of thermal explosion. During high-temperature synthesis of both powder mixtures, the formation of both stable TiAl, TiAl3, TiAl2 and metastable Ti3Al5, Ti5Al11, Ti9Al23 phases is observed by the start of shooting at the temperature T = 555–558°C. A specific feature of the phase formation process in a γ-irradiated sample is the existence of the α2-phase (Ti3Al), which is not seen in the unirradiated sample.

(3) A nearly single phase equilibrium product γ-(TiAl) containing TiAl (92%) and TiAl3 (8%) is synthesized after γ-irradiation of the mechanically activated mixture. In the unirradiated mechanically activated mixture the content of TiAl in the synthesized product is 72%; the existence of TiAl3 (26%) and residual Ti (2%) is recorded.

Funding information

The following funding is acknowledged: This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation (Zadanie No. 11.1085.2017/4.6).

References

First citationAppel, F. & Oehring, M. (2003). Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Fundamentals and Applications, edited by C. Leyens & M. Peters, pp. 89–152. Wiley-VCH.  Google Scholar
First citationClemens, H. & Kestler, H. (2000). Adv. Eng. Mater. 2, 551–570.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationFilimonov, V. Yu., Evstigneev, V. V., Afanas'ev, A. V. & Loginova, M. V. (2008). Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 17, 101–105.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationFilimonov, V. Yu., Sitnikov, A. A., Afanas'ev, A. V., Loginova, M. V., Yakovlev, V. I., Negodyaev, A. Z., Schreifer, D. V. & Solov'ev, V. A. (2014). Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 23, 18–25.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationGras, C., Gaffet, E. & Bernard, F. (2006). Intermetallics, 14, 521–529.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationIlleková, E., Gachon, J. C., Rogachev, A., Grigoryan, H., Schuster, J. C., Nosyrev, A. & Tsygankov, P. (2008). Thermochim. Acta, 469, 77–85.  Google Scholar
First citationLagos, M. A., Agote, I., Gutiérrez, M., Sargsyan, A. & Pambaguian, L. (2010). Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 19, 23–27.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLiss, K.-D., Whitfield, R. E., Xu, W., Buslaps, T., Yeoh, L. A., Wu, X., Zhang, D. & Xia, K. (2009). J. Synchrotron Rad. 16, 825–834.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationLoginova, M. V., Filimonov, V. Yu., Yakovlev, V. I., Sytnikov, A. A., Negodyaev, A. Z. & Shreifer, D. V. (2015). Appl. Mech. Mater. 788, 117–122.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationLoginova, M., Sobachkin, A., Sitnikov, A., Yakovlev, V., Filimonov, V., Myasnikov, A., Sharafutdinov, M. & Tolochko, B. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 422–429.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationLoginova, M. V., Sobachkin, A. V., Sitnikov, A. A., Yakovlev, V. I., Filimonov, V. Yu., Ivanov, S. G., Myasnikov, A. Yu., Negodyaev, A. Z. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018a). Basic Probl. Mater. Sci. pp. 53–58.  Google Scholar
First citationLoginova, M. V., Yakovlev, V. I., Filimonov, V. Y., Sitnikov, A. A., Sobachkin, A. V., Ivanov, S. G. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018b). Lett. Mater. 8, 129–134.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationLoginova, M. V., Yakovlev, V. I., Sitnikov, A. A., Filimonov, V. Yu., Sobachkin, A. V. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018c). J. Synch. Investig. 12, 480–484.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMerzhanov, A. G. & Abramov, V. G. (1981). Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 6, 130–148.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMukasyan, A. S., White, J. D. E., Kovalev, D. Y., Kochetov, N. A., Ponomarev, V. I. & Son, S. F. (2010). Physica B, 405, 778–784.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationNaundorf, V. (1992). Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 06, 2925–2986.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationNeklyudov, I. M. & Voyevodin, V. N. (1994). J. Nucl. Mater. 212–215, 39–44.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationNovák, P., Kubásek, J., Šerák, J., Vojtěch, D. & Michalcová, A. (2009). Int. J. Mater. Res. 100, 353–355.  Google Scholar
First citationPopova, A. A., Sobachkin, A. V., Nazarov, I. V., Yakovlev, V. I., Loginova, M. V., Sitnikov, A. A., Sharafutdinov, M. R. & Lyakhov, N. Z. (2013). Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 77, 120–122.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationShi, Q., Qin, B., Feng, P., Ran, H., Song, B., Wang, J. & Ge, Y. (2015). RSC Adv. 5, 46339–46347.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSobachkin, A. V., Loginova, M. V., Sitnikov, A. A., Yakovlev, V. I., Filimonov, V. Yu. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018a). Mater. Sci. Eng. 327, 032051.  Google Scholar
First citationSobachkin, A. V., Loginova, M. V., Sitnikov, A. A., Yakovlev, V. I., Filimonov, V. Yu., Ivanov, S. G., Myasnikov, A. Yu. & Gradoboev, A. V. (2018b). Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Explosive Production of New Materials: Science, Technology, Business and Innovations, 14–18 May 2018, St Petersburg, Russia, pp. 265–268 (https://doi.org/10.30826/EPNM18-092).  Google Scholar
First citationSobachkin, A. V., Yu Myasnikov, A., Sitnikov, A. A. & Sharafutdinov, M. R. (2019). Mater. Sci. Eng. 483, 012061.  Google Scholar
First citationVaucher, S., Stir, M., Ishizaki, K., Catala-Civera, J. M. & Nicula, R. (2011). Thermochim. Acta, 522, 151–154.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationWang, T. & Zhang, J. (2006). Mater. Chem. Phys. 99, 20–25.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationWeimer, M. & Kelly, T. (2008). Proceedings of the Structural Aluminides for Elevated Temperatures: Gamma Titanium and Other Metallic Aluminides Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, pp. 5–6.  Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds