research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775

Gold nano-mesh synthesis by continuous-flow X-ray irradiation

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDepartment of Engineering Science, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan, bInstitute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan, cDepartment of Physics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore, and dEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne 1015, Switzerland
*Correspondence e-mail: phhwu@sinica.edu.tw

Edited by I. Lindau, SLAC/Stanford University, USA (Received 27 April 2019; accepted 27 August 2019; online 23 September 2019)

X-ray irradiation has been extensively used in recent years as a fabrication step for nanoparticles and nanoparticle systems. A variant of this technique, continuous-flow X-ray irradiation, has recently been developed, and offers three important advantages: precise control of the irradiation dose, elimination of convection effects in the precursor solution, and suitability for large-scale production. Here, the use of this method to fabricate Au nano-meshes of interest as transparent and flexible electrodes for optoelectronics is reported. The study includes extensive characterization of the synthesis parameters and of the product properties, with rather encouraging results.

1. Introduction

The growth of nanotechnology systems requires a constant development of new fabrication techniques. In particular, methods based on X-ray irradiation have produced many positive results in recent years. However, such methods are still affected by problems such as the reliable control of fabrication parameters and the use for mass production.

We are now developing a special variety of irradiation growth of nanosystems, in which the precursor solution is forced to flow at a controlled rate in front of the irradiating beam. The flow rate determines the total irradiation dose, which can thus be controlled easily and with great accuracy. This is an important achievement, since the dose is a crucial factor in the final characteristics of the products.

We present here some of the first results of this `continuous-flow X-ray irradiation' method, specifically the fabrication of accurate Au meshes with nanoscale structures, good conductivity, flexibility and transparency to visible light. Such properties make them suitable for flexible optoelectronics devices and therefore very interesting for technology.

Specifically, our products can be used as transparent conducting electrodes (TCEs), which are key components of optoelectronics devices such as touchscreens, e-papers, organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), liquid-crystal displays and solar cells. They could replace in flexible devices tin-doped indium oxide (ITO) and fluorine-doped tin oxide electrodes, with several advantages (Edwards et al., 2004[Edwards, P. P., Porch, A., Jones, M. O., Morgan, D. V. & Perks, R. M. (2004). Dalton Trans. pp. 2995-3002.]) such as their non-brittle nature (Chen et al., 2002[Chen, Z., Cotterell, B. & Wang, W. (2002). Eng. Fract. Mech. 69, 597-603.]). They could also become strong competitors for Ag nanowires, the alternate solution for flexible optoelectronics, which is affected by a series of problems such as long-term instability (Wu et al., 2004[Wu, Z., Chen, Z., Du, X., Logan, J. M., Sippel, J., Nikolou, M., Kamaras, K., Reynolds, J. R., Tanner, D. B., Hebard, A. F. & Rinzler, A. G. (2004). Science, 305, 1273-1276.]; Gou et al., 2007[Gou, L., Chipara, M. & Zaleski, J. M. (2007). Chem. Mater. 19, 1755-1760.]; Kang & Guo, 2007[Kang, M. G. & Guo, L. J. (2007). Adv. Mater. 19, 1391-1396.]; Eda et al., 2008[Eda, G., Fanchini, G. & Chhowalla, M. (2008). Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 270-274.]; Lee et al., 2008[Lee, J. Y., Connor, S. T., Cui, Y. & Peumans, P. (2008). Nano Lett. 8, 689-692.]; De et al., 2009[De, S., Higgins, T. M., Lyons, P. E., Doherty, E. M., Nirmalraj, P. N., Blau, W. J., Boland, J. J. & Coleman, J. N. (2009). ACS Nano, 3, 1767-1774.]; Doherty et al., 2009[Doherty, E. M., De, S., Lyons, P. E., Shmeliov, A., Nirmalraj, P. N., Scardaci, V., Joimel, J., Blau, W. J., Boland, J. J. & Coleman, J. N. (2009). Carbon, 47, 2466-2473.]; Reina et al., 2009[Reina, A., Jia, X., Ho, J., Nezich, D., Son, H., Bulovic, V., Dresselhaus, M. S. & Kong, J. (2009). Nano Lett. 9, 30-35.]; Tung et al., 2009[Tung, V. C., Chen, L. M., Allen, M. J., Wassei, J. K., Nelson, K., Kaner, R. B. & Yang, Y. (2009). Nano Lett. 9, 1949-1955.]; Catrysse & Fan, 2010[Catrysse, P. B. & Fan, S. (2010). Nano Lett. 10, 2944-2949.]; Hecht et al., 2011[Hecht, D. S., Hu, L. & Irvin, G. (2011). Adv. Mater. 23, 1482-1513.]; Khaligh & Goldthorpe, 2013[Khaligh, H. H. & Goldthorpe, I. A. (2013). Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8, 235.]; Cheon et al., 2017[Cheon, Y., Nam, J., Kim, C. S. & Jo, S. (2017). AIP Adv. 7, 025215.]; Zhang et al., 2017[Zhang, P., Wyman, I., Hu, J., Lin, S., Zhong, Z., Tu, Y., Huang, Z. & Wei, Y. (2017). Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 223, 1-23.]).

Our present work is built on many years of research on nanofabrication by X-ray irradiation. We specifically applied this approach to naked and polymer-coated metallic nanoparticles (Wang et al., 2007[Wang, C.-H., Chien, C.-C., Yu, Y.-L., Liu, C.-J., Lee, C.-F., Chen, C.-H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C.-S., Je, J.-H. & Margaritondo, G. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 477-482.], 2008[Wang, C. H., Liu, C. J., Wang, C. L., Hua, T. E., Obliosca, J. M., Lee, K. H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C., Liu, R. S., Lin, H. M., Je, J. H. & Margaritondo, G. (2008). J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41, 195301.], 2009[Wang, C. H., Liu, C. J., Wang, C. L., Chien, C. C., Hwu, Y., Liu, R. S., Yang, C. S., Je, J. H., Lin, H. M. & Margaritondo, G. (2009). Appl. Phys. A, 97, 295-300.]), bimetallic nanoparticles (Wang et al., 2011[Wang, C. L., Hsao, B. J., Lai, S. F., Chen, W. C., Chen, H. H., Chen, Y. Y. C., Chien, C. C., Cai, X., Kempson, I. M., Hwu, Y. & Margaritondo, G. (2011). Nanotechnology, 22, 065605.]; Li et al., 2015[Li, M. T., Wang, C. H., Lai, S. F., Ong, E. B. L., Chen, Y. H., Lin, C. K., Margaritondo, G. & Hwu, Y. (2015). Nanotechnology, 26, 355601.]) and fluorescent gold nanoparticles (Lai et al., 2013[Lai, S. F., Chien, C. C., Chen, W. C., Chen, H. H., Chen, Y. Y., Wang, C. L., Hwu, Y., Yang, C. S., Chen, C. Y., Liang, K. S., Petibois, C., Tan, H. R., Tok, E. S. & Margaritondo, G. (2013). Biotechnol. Adv. 31, 362-368.], 2015[Lai, S. F., Tan, H. R., Tok, E. S., Chen, Y. H., Ong, E. B. L., Li, M. T., Chen, Y. Y., Chien, F. C., Chen, P., Margaritondo, G. & Hwu, Y. (2015). Chem. Commun. 51, 7954-7957.]). Fabrication by irradiation offers superior advantages including a fast and simple control of the nanoparticle size.

These above studies also revealed and empirically investigated a wealth of physical mechanisms underlying the irradiation processes. With intense X-rays bombarding uniformly the entire aqueous solution, strong reducing agents, such as [{\rm{H}}^\bullet] radicals and hydrated electrons (eaq-), were generated almost instantly and converted metallic ions into metal atoms. The nuclei formed at supersaturated metallic atoms, then grew to larger particles. This process continued until the solution was depleted of metallic atoms. The important point is that such multiple mechanisms enhance the actual and potential flexibility in controlling the synthesis parameters and the products. However, only a fraction of this flexibility has been exploited so far.

Specifically, the previous synthesis procedures used individual batches of precursors loaded in tubes and then exposed to X-rays (Wang et al., 2007[Wang, C.-H., Chien, C.-C., Yu, Y.-L., Liu, C.-J., Lee, C.-F., Chen, C.-H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C.-S., Je, J.-H. & Margaritondo, G. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 477-482.]; Liu et al., 2009[Liu, C.-J., Wang, C.-H., Wang, C.-L., Hwu, Y., Lin, C.-Y. & Margaritondo, G. (2009). J. Synchrotron Rad. 16, 395-397.]). The radiation exposure time was controlled by the X-ray shutter. In the initial phase of parameter optimization, the convection in the precursor solution limited the processes to small volumes and short exposures (Yang et al., 2006[Yang, Y.-C., Wang, C.-H., Hwu, Y.-K. & Je, J.-H. (2006). Mater. Chem. Phys. 100, 72-76.]). This approach cannot be used for large volumes: the X-ray attenuation requires longer irradiations, and due to convection the irradiation time cannot control the exposure. This is a problem, since accurate exposure control is critical in many cases, for example in the synthesis of MUA-Au nanoparticles to produce nanoparticles of homogeneous small size and with strong photoluminance (Lai et al., 2012[Lai, S.-F., Chien, C.-C., Chen, W.-C., Chen, Y.-Y., Wang, C.-H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C. S. & Margaritondo, G. (2012). RSC Adv. 2, 6185-6191.]).

The new step in continuous-flow X-ray irradiation is motivated by several factors. First, the total irradiation is determined by the time spent by the precursor solution in front of the X-ray beam. This simply corresponds to the flow rate, so that by tuning the rate we can accurately control the irradiation. In turn, we previously demonstrated that the irradiation determines a series of important product parameters such as the nanoparticle size and shape.

This variant of X-ray nanofabrication can be readily used for mass production with accurate control of the products. We investigated the corresponding issues by studying the effects not only of the flow rate but also of the capping agent and of the pH of the precursor solution.

With a specific set of fabrication conditions, the synthesized Au nanoparticles form two-dimensional random net structures material on several different substrates, such as Si and glass, without requiring any additional treatment. The size of our Au nano-meshes is up to several micrometres and the average nanoparticle diameter is ∼10 nm.

Some important properties of the Au nano-meshes were measured, finding results suitable for transparent conductive films. Overall, our findings are quite encouraging and show that continuous-flow X-ray irradiation is a simple and effective technique for the mass production of important optoelectronic device components. Its applications could potentially extend to other devices and other domains.

2. Materials and methods

HAuCl4·3H2O, sodium hydroxide, (hy­droxy­propyl)­methyl cellulose (HPMC) (viscosity 2600–5600 cP), poly(ethyl glycol) 6000 and 20000, polyvinyl­pyrrolidone 40000, poly(vinyl) alcohol 130000, polyethyl­enmine (branched) 2000, poly(acrylic acid) 15000, citric acid and di­methyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All chemicals were reagent grade. Distilled deionized (d.d.) water was purified with a Millipore Milli-Q water system. The aqueous precursor solution was prepared by mixing HAuCl4·3H2O (10 mM) and adjusting the pH with sodium hydroxide (0.1 M) to reach the final Au concentration of 1 mM.

The continuous flow through the X-ray beam was implemented by pumping the precursor solution with an adjustable-speed rotary pump into a stainless steel convection-free reactor with a 11.5 mm × 7 mm × 0.5 mm reaction chamber. The reactor had a Kapton X-ray-transmitting front window connecting it to the BL01A beamline of the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC, Hsinchu, Taiwan), as well as a back window allowing the X-ray beam to pass through. Details of the X-ray source have been reported elsewhere (Wang et al., 2007[Wang, C.-H., Chien, C.-C., Yu, Y.-L., Liu, C.-J., Lee, C.-F., Chen, C.-H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C.-S., Je, J.-H. & Margaritondo, G. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 477-482.]; Liu et al., 2009[Liu, C.-J., Wang, C.-H., Wang, C.-L., Hwu, Y., Lin, C.-Y. & Margaritondo, G. (2009). J. Synchrotron Rad. 16, 395-397.]; Song et al., 2007[Song, Y.-F., Chang, C.-H., Liu, C.-Y., Chang, S.-H., Jeng, U.-S., Lai, Y.-H., Liu, D.-G., Chung, S.-C., Tsang, K.-L., Yin, G.-C., Lee, J.-F., Sheu, H.-S., Tang, M.-T., Hwang, C.-S., Hwu, Y.-K. & Liang, K. S. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 320-325.]).

Note that the BL01A beamline uses a superconducting wavelength shifter to produce high-energy photons from a medium-energy, 1.5 GeV, storage ring (Taiwan Light Source), operated at 300 mA electron current and with top-up injection. The photon energy of the unmonochromatized X-rays generated by this insertion device is ∼6.5–30 keV and peaks at ∼12 keV. The X-ray beams are trimmed by a pair of slits to obtain a transversal beam section ∼13 mm × 9 mm, to cover the complete precursor container. The dose rate was 4.7 × 105 Gy s−1 (Wang et al., 2007[Wang, C.-H., Chien, C.-C., Yu, Y.-L., Liu, C.-J., Lee, C.-F., Chen, C.-H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C.-S., Je, J.-H. & Margaritondo, G. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 477-482.]; Liu et al., 2009[Liu, C.-J., Wang, C.-H., Wang, C.-L., Hwu, Y., Lin, C.-Y. & Margaritondo, G. (2009). J. Synchrotron Rad. 16, 395-397.]). The relation between dose and flow rate is shown in Table 1[link]. The temperature of the reaction chamber was controlled by cooling flows of compressed air aimed at the front and back windows. Fig. 1[link] outlines the continuous-flow X-ray irradiation system.

Table 1
Relationship between flow rate, irradiation time and dose

Flow rate (ml min−1) 40 20 10 5 2 1 0.5
Irradiation time (s) 0.06 0.12 0.24 0.48 1.2 2.4 4.8
Estimated dose (Gy) 2.5 × 104 5.1 × 104 1.0 × 104 2.0 × 105 5.1 × 105 1.0 × 106 2.0 × 106
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of our continuous X-ray irradiation system.

The fabricated nano-meshes were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The specimens for TEM were prepared by placing a drop of the solution on a carbon-coated copper grid and drying it at 40°C. TEM measurements were performed in a JEM-2100F system operating at 200 kV.

Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectra of the irradiated solution were acquired with an Ocean Optics USB4000 spectrophotometer with a 1 cm length cuvette. In addition to TEM characterization, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were recorded using a FEI Inspect F SEM.

The sheet resistance of the dried film was measured with a four-point probe (Quatek, QTI-5601TSR) for nine different specimen areas. UV-Vis spectra were also taken for the dried nano-mesh films, using the glass substrate as a reference.

To prepare the nano-meshes, 0.1% PEG (polyethyl­ene glycol) 20k was added to the irradiated precursor solution and then centrifuged at 3000 r.p.m. for 10 min. The upper portion of the solution was decanted, obtaining a precipitated black solution. The product was resupplied with d.d. water reaching a 0.2 ml volume and then re-dispersed into water by pipette. Then, 0.05 ml of 2 wt% HPMC were added and the resulting `ink' was slowly stirred to mix it well.

This ink was used to fabricate a transparent conductive film. A 100 mm × 100 mm, 1 mm-thick glass slide was the substrate. Before coating, the glass was cleaned with acetone, methanol and d.d. water, and treated with a glow discharge (EMS100X, USA) to increase its hydro­philic properties. The glass was then coated with the `ink' using a Mayer rod (model RDS-11) to hold the substrate; the relative speed of the rod with respect to the substrate was 5 mm s−1. The ink-coated glass was dried in a 50°C oven.

3. Results and discussion

Fig. 2[link] shows the UV-Vis absorption spectra of the Au precursor after irradiation for different flow rates. The inset shows the corresponding solutions. The smallest rates, 0.5, 1 and 2 ml min−1, produced similar surface plasmon resonance (SPR) peaks. When the rate increased to 5 ml min−1, the SPR started to shift and to become wider, revealing changes in the nanoparticle size and size distribution (Foss et al., 1994[Foss, C. A., Hornyak, G. L., Stockert, J. A. & Martin, C. R. (1994). J. Phys. Chem. 98, 2963-2971.]). For 10 ml min−1, the SPR disappeared and the solution color became dark gray. For additional increases of the rate to 20 and 40 ml min−1, the absorbance value decreased.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
UV-Vis optical absorption spectra of our products for different flow rates. The visual appearance of the products is shown in the upper-right pictures.

Fig. 3(a)[link] shows representative TEM micrographs of Au nanoparticles in the irradiated solution. The size for a 1 ml min−1 flow rate was 7.5 ± 1.9 nm. When the flow rate increased to 5 ml min−1, the solution contained spherical Au nanoclusters with 13.4 ± 3 nm diameter and some irregular chain-like segments, Fig. 3(b)[link]. At 10 ml min−1, the solution color became darker and the chain segments became longer, forming networks of Au nanowires with 6.6 ± 1.2 nm diameter, Fig. 3(c)[link]. The size of the networks, i.e. of the mesh structures, ranged from hundreds of nanometres to a few micrometres.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Typical TEM images of our dried products for different flow rates: 1, 5, 10, 20 and 40 ml min−1 for (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e).

The high-resolution TEM images of Fig. 3(e)[link] exhibit fringes attributed to diffraction from [111] and [200] planes, revealing a polycrystalline structure of the meshes (Pei et al., 2004[Pei, L., Mori, K. & Adachi, M. (2004). Langmuir, 20, 7837-7843.]). As the flow rate raised to 20 ml min−1, the nanoparticles fused into a big amorphous cluster, Fig. 3(d)[link]. In addition to gold nano-meshes obtained from the 1 mM precursor, we also could obtain similar mesh structures from a 2 mM Au precursor, but denser in mesh unit center and thicker in diameter (data not shown).

As mentioned, each flow rate gives a specific irradiation time: the above rates correspond to 0.06, 0.12, 0.24, 0.48, 1.2, 2.4 and 4.8 s. The shortest time cannot produce a stable network nor well dispersed nanoparticles, hence the resulting big nanoparticle cluster. As the irradiation time increases, small nanoparticle clusters can assemble together along lines and produce large networks. For the longest irradiations the net structure breaks down, finally yielding stable isolated nano-spheres.

This trend is similar to that proposed by Pong et al. (2007[Pong, B. K., Elim, H. I., Chong, J. X., Ji, W., Trout, B. L. & Lee, J. Y. (2007). J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 6281-6287.]) for Au nanoparticles produced by citrate reduction. Note, however, that our irradiation method does not require capping, which can prevent the production of conducting networks.

The effects of the solution pH are shown in Figs. 4[link] and 5[link], reporting UV-Vis and TEM results for mesh solutions obtained with a 10 ml min−1 flow rate. The pH was controlled by adding different amounts of NaOH to the precursor solution, obtaining pH values of 11.22, 10.35, 8.73, 6.21 and 4.3. We see in Fig. 4[link] that for a pH above 10 the Au SPR peak is weak, indicating the formation of nano-meshes. This is corroborated by the TEM images of Figs. 5(a) and 5[link](b)[link]. As the pH value decreases, the SPR peak becomes more prominent; as confirmed by the TEM image of Fig. 5(c)[link], this means that mesh structures are still formed, but with smaller sizes. Also, the majority of nanostructures are short segments of nanowires. This trend continues as shown by Fig. 5(d)[link], with more short segments and quite a lot of spherical nanoparticles of size 19 ± 3.4 nm. For the lowest pH value, the nano-mesh structure completely disappears and is replaced by spherical nanoparticles of size 16.2 ± 4.5 nm.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
UV-Vis optical absorption spectra for a flow rate of 10 ml min−1 and for different pH values.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Typical TEM micrographs with 10 ml min−1 flow rate of flow system synthesis for different NaOH concentrations. (a) 1 mM, (b) 0.8 mM, (c) 0.6 mM, (d) 0.4 mM, (e) 0.2 mM.

We discuss now the issue of capping. Capping agents are often added to the precursor solution to control the nanoparticles size and surface properties. For example, in the popular citrate reduction method of preparing gold nanoparticles the citrate ions act both as reducing agent and as stabilizing agent. In our previous X-ray synthesis methods, reduction was guaranteed by the solvated electron eaq- and by [{\rm{H}}^\bullet] induced by X-rays (Wang et al., 2007[Wang, C.-H., Chien, C.-C., Yu, Y.-L., Liu, C.-J., Lee, C.-F., Chen, C.-H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C.-S., Je, J.-H. & Margaritondo, G. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 477-482.]), and stabilization of the Au nanoparticles by pH control. This means that our products were free of capping agents.

Can the same approach be used for the fabrication of nano-meshes discussed here? We analyzed this question by adding different concentrations of the capping agent PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidone) to the precursor solution while using a flow rate of 10 ml min−1. The results are shown in Fig. 6[link]: higher capping agent concentrations lead to the formation of spherical particles.

[Figure 6]
Figure 6
UV-Vis optical absorption spectra of products obtained with a 10 ml min−1 flow rate in the presence of different concentrations of the capping agent PVP.

We also tested low concentrations of different capping agents: PEG 6K, PVP 40K, PVA [poly(vinyl alcohol)] 130K, PEI (polyethyl­enimine) 2K, PAA [poly(acrylic acid)] 15K and citrate acid. The results are shown in Fig. 7[link]: PEG, PVP and PVA give similar results, i.e. naked Au nano-meshes (data not shown). The addition of PEI, PAA or citrate acid breaks down the nano-mesh structure, and particles and nanowire fragments are detected. In summary, capping agents appear unnecessary or even detrimental for our present fabrication technique for TCEs.

[Figure 7]
Figure 7
Typical TEM micrographs with two different magnifications of products obtained with a 10 ml min−1 flow rate in the presence of different capping agents: (a), (b) for PEI; (c), (d) for PAA; (e), (f) for citric acid.

Finally, we tested the use of our meshes to realize transparent conductive thin films on 10 cm × 10 cm glass substrates. Specific volumes of Au nano-meshes were collected by centrifugation. Then, HPMC was added as adhesive agent and DMSO was used to decrease de-wetting.

The results of sheet resistance and transmittance measurements on the resulting thin films are shown in Fig. 8[link]. The lowest sheet resistance, 22.5 Ω sq−1 (over the 10 mm × 10 mm coated area on glass substrate), was obtained with a 63.03 mg ml−1 (320 mM) Au nano-mesh concentration, which had 34% transmittance. The highest transmittance, 58%, was obtained with 31.51 mg ml−1 (160 mM), corresponding to a sheet resistance of 280 Ω sq−1. The UV-Vis transmission spectra of the films is featureless in the visible range. The SEM image of Fig. 9[link] shows the morphology of the transparent conductive film. The atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of Fig. 10[link] shows more details about the surface roughness.

[Figure 8]
Figure 8
Sheet resistance and transmittance of conductive film for different Au nano-mesh concentrations. Inset: transmittance spectra in the visible for three concentrations.
[Figure 9]
Figure 9
SEM image of one of our conductive films.
[Figure 10]
Figure 10
AFM image of the same specimen as Fig. 9[link].

We can see some aggregated meshes that could explain the relatively high sheet resistance and low transmittance compared with the commercial ITO glass with transmittance >80% and sheet resistance <15 Ω sq−1 (Lee et al., 2008[Lee, J. Y., Connor, S. T., Cui, Y. & Peumans, P. (2008). Nano Lett. 8, 689-692.]). Better synthesis control with the flow irradiation system is expected to sharply reduce or eliminate the aggregation. On the other hand, our irradiation method can use a wide range of synthesis parameters to control the Au wires thickness and length. A similar morphology tuning of silver nanowires, graphene and carbon nanotubes was very effective in increasing the transmittance and sheet conductance (Lee et al., 2013[Lee, J., Lee, P., Lee, H. B., Hong, S., Lee, I., Yeo, J., Lee, S. S., Kim, T.-S., Lee, D. & Ko, S. H. (2013). Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 4171-4176.]; Han et al., 2018[Han, N. M., Wang, Z., Shen, X., Wu, Y., Liu, X., Zheng, Q., Kim, T.-H., Yang, J. & Kim, J.-K. (2018). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 6580-6592.]; Farbod et al., 2017[Farbod, M., Zilaie, A. & Kazeminezhad, I. (2017). J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Dev. 2, 99-104.]).

Also note that, compared with other TCE films in their early development phase, e.g. 102 to 103 Ω sq−1 for graphene, and 1 kΩ sq−1 for carbon nanotubes (Becerril et al., 2008[Becerril, H. A., Mao, J., Liu, Z., Stoltenberg, R. M., Bao, Z. & Chen, Y. (2008). ACS Nano, 2, 463-470.]; Kaempgen et al., 2005[Kaempgen, M., Duesberg, G. S. & Roth, S. (2005). Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 425-429.]), the measured values of our nano-mesh Au TCE films are quite encouraging. The procedure is far from being optimized but even the preliminary tests give promising values. Therefore, the final objective of surpassing the above performances of commercial devices appears feasible.

For Ag nanowires prepared by polyol method, PVP usually acts as a structure-directing agent and capping agent. Together with PVP, other organic compounds, like iso­propanol, also become trapped between the nanowires. This creates an insulating interface between the nanowires. These thin organic layers are difficult to remove unless they are heated up to their decomposition temperature (Langley et al., 2014[Langley, D. P., Lagrange, M., Giusti, G., Jiménez, C., Bréchet, Y., Nguyen, N. D. & Bellet, D. (2014). Nanoscale, 6, 13535-13543.]). Also, high-temperature processes inhibit the application of temperature-sensitive substrate. Our gold nano-mesh is a capping-agent-free material, and will benefit from its natural formation.

4. Conclusions

We have developed a continuous-flow X-ray irradiation technique that offers precise control of the irradiation dose, elimination of convection effects in the precursor solution, and suitability for large-scale production. The Au nano-meshes of interest as transparent and flexible electrodes for optoelectronics were fabricated by this method; the synthesis parameters and the product properties were extensively characterized, with rather encouraging results.

Acknowledgements

We thank Stephanie Hwu for the graphic works.

Funding information

The following funding is acknowledged: Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (grant No. MOST 106-0210-01-15-02; grant No. MOST 107-0210-01-19-01); EPFL.

References

First citationBecerril, H. A., Mao, J., Liu, Z., Stoltenberg, R. M., Bao, Z. & Chen, Y. (2008). ACS Nano, 2, 463–470.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationCatrysse, P. B. & Fan, S. (2010). Nano Lett. 10, 2944–2949.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationChen, Z., Cotterell, B. & Wang, W. (2002). Eng. Fract. Mech. 69, 597–603.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationCheon, Y., Nam, J., Kim, C. S. & Jo, S. (2017). AIP Adv. 7, 025215.  Google Scholar
First citationDe, S., Higgins, T. M., Lyons, P. E., Doherty, E. M., Nirmalraj, P. N., Blau, W. J., Boland, J. J. & Coleman, J. N. (2009). ACS Nano, 3, 1767–1774.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationDoherty, E. M., De, S., Lyons, P. E., Shmeliov, A., Nirmalraj, P. N., Scardaci, V., Joimel, J., Blau, W. J., Boland, J. J. & Coleman, J. N. (2009). Carbon, 47, 2466–2473.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationEda, G., Fanchini, G. & Chhowalla, M. (2008). Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 270–274.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationEdwards, P. P., Porch, A., Jones, M. O., Morgan, D. V. & Perks, R. M. (2004). Dalton Trans. pp. 2995–3002.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationFarbod, M., Zilaie, A. & Kazeminezhad, I. (2017). J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Dev. 2, 99–104.  Google Scholar
First citationFoss, C. A., Hornyak, G. L., Stockert, J. A. & Martin, C. R. (1994). J. Phys. Chem. 98, 2963–2971.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationGou, L., Chipara, M. & Zaleski, J. M. (2007). Chem. Mater. 19, 1755–1760.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationHan, N. M., Wang, Z., Shen, X., Wu, Y., Liu, X., Zheng, Q., Kim, T.-H., Yang, J. & Kim, J.-K. (2018). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 6580–6592.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationHecht, D. S., Hu, L. & Irvin, G. (2011). Adv. Mater. 23, 1482–1513.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationKaempgen, M., Duesberg, G. S. & Roth, S. (2005). Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 425–429.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKang, M. G. & Guo, L. J. (2007). Adv. Mater. 19, 1391–1396.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKhaligh, H. H. & Goldthorpe, I. A. (2013). Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8, 235.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationLai, S. F., Chien, C. C., Chen, W. C., Chen, H. H., Chen, Y. Y., Wang, C. L., Hwu, Y., Yang, C. S., Chen, C. Y., Liang, K. S., Petibois, C., Tan, H. R., Tok, E. S. & Margaritondo, G. (2013). Biotechnol. Adv. 31, 362–368.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationLai, S.-F., Chien, C.-C., Chen, W.-C., Chen, Y.-Y., Wang, C.-H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C. S. & Margaritondo, G. (2012). RSC Adv. 2, 6185–6191.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLai, S. F., Tan, H. R., Tok, E. S., Chen, Y. H., Ong, E. B. L., Li, M. T., Chen, Y. Y., Chien, F. C., Chen, P., Margaritondo, G. & Hwu, Y. (2015). Chem. Commun. 51, 7954–7957.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLangley, D. P., Lagrange, M., Giusti, G., Jiménez, C., Bréchet, Y., Nguyen, N. D. & Bellet, D. (2014). Nanoscale, 6, 13535–13543.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationLee, J., Lee, P., Lee, H. B., Hong, S., Lee, I., Yeo, J., Lee, S. S., Kim, T.-S., Lee, D. & Ko, S. H. (2013). Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 4171–4176.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLee, J. Y., Connor, S. T., Cui, Y. & Peumans, P. (2008). Nano Lett. 8, 689–692.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationLi, M. T., Wang, C. H., Lai, S. F., Ong, E. B. L., Chen, Y. H., Lin, C. K., Margaritondo, G. & Hwu, Y. (2015). Nanotechnology, 26, 355601.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationLiu, C.-J., Wang, C.-H., Wang, C.-L., Hwu, Y., Lin, C.-Y. & Margaritondo, G. (2009). J. Synchrotron Rad. 16, 395–397.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationPei, L., Mori, K. & Adachi, M. (2004). Langmuir, 20, 7837–7843.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationPong, B. K., Elim, H. I., Chong, J. X., Ji, W., Trout, B. L. & Lee, J. Y. (2007). J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 6281–6287.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationReina, A., Jia, X., Ho, J., Nezich, D., Son, H., Bulovic, V., Dresselhaus, M. S. & Kong, J. (2009). Nano Lett. 9, 30–35.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationSong, Y.-F., Chang, C.-H., Liu, C.-Y., Chang, S.-H., Jeng, U.-S., Lai, Y.-H., Liu, D.-G., Chung, S.-C., Tsang, K.-L., Yin, G.-C., Lee, J.-F., Sheu, H.-S., Tang, M.-T., Hwang, C.-S., Hwu, Y.-K. & Liang, K. S. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 320–325.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationTung, V. C., Chen, L. M., Allen, M. J., Wassei, J. K., Nelson, K., Kaner, R. B. & Yang, Y. (2009). Nano Lett. 9, 1949–1955.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationWang, C.-H., Chien, C.-C., Yu, Y.-L., Liu, C.-J., Lee, C.-F., Chen, C.-H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C.-S., Je, J.-H. & Margaritondo, G. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 477–482.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWang, C. H., Liu, C. J., Wang, C. L., Chien, C. C., Hwu, Y., Liu, R. S., Yang, C. S., Je, J. H., Lin, H. M. & Margaritondo, G. (2009). Appl. Phys. A, 97, 295–300.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationWang, C. H., Liu, C. J., Wang, C. L., Hua, T. E., Obliosca, J. M., Lee, K. H., Hwu, Y., Yang, C., Liu, R. S., Lin, H. M., Je, J. H. & Margaritondo, G. (2008). J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41, 195301.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationWang, C. L., Hsao, B. J., Lai, S. F., Chen, W. C., Chen, H. H., Chen, Y. Y. C., Chien, C. C., Cai, X., Kempson, I. M., Hwu, Y. & Margaritondo, G. (2011). Nanotechnology, 22, 065605.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationWu, Z., Chen, Z., Du, X., Logan, J. M., Sippel, J., Nikolou, M., Kamaras, K., Reynolds, J. R., Tanner, D. B., Hebard, A. F. & Rinzler, A. G. (2004). Science, 305, 1273–1276.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationYang, Y.-C., Wang, C.-H., Hwu, Y.-K. & Je, J.-H. (2006). Mater. Chem. Phys. 100, 72–76.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationZhang, P., Wyman, I., Hu, J., Lin, S., Zhong, Z., Tu, Y., Huang, Z. & Wei, Y. (2017). Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 223, 1–23.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds